Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

WATCH: AOC becomes stuttering mess when asked a simple question Q: “Would and should the U.S. actually commit U.S. troops to defend Taiwan?” AOC: “Um you know I think that uh this such a uh you know I think that this is um. This is of course uhh a...

2,142,105 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

AP’s Zeke Miller: “[I]n your first briefing here as press secretary, you committed to speaking to the American people and I quote, “in a transparent way —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— in a truthful way, and an honest way.” KJP: “Yes.” Miller: “[A]nd then in July, here at this podium —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— you were asked about the President pardoning his son, and you said, ‘it's a no, it will be a no, it's a no.’” KJP: “Yes, and that — that is exactly right.” Miller: “So [inaudible] of the President’s son and that pardon —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— it became a yes.” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “I'm wondering if you would like to explain — KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— to us, the American people, really why the information —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— that you provided turned out to not be true?? KJP: “And — and I — and I — and I answered this question on Monday. We spent about 30 minutes on this — almost 30 minutes — roughly 30 minutes on this particular issue, and I'm just going to reiterate what I said — uh — in air — on Air Force One, to your colleagues when I did the gaggle, and look, if you look at his statement, it's pretty comprehensive — uh — the statement that he put out on Sunday when he made the decision to pardon his son Hunter Biden. It — uh — it's — it's in his own voice — uh — I think it takes you through his thinking, and he did. He wrestled with this. He wrestled with this — uh — and again, he said in his statement in his own voice that he made that decision this past weekend, and the fact is — uh — when you think about how the president got to this decision, circumstances have changed. They have — and a couple of things, and I said this — uh — I said this — uh — on Monday as well. Republicans said they weren't going to let up — uh — weren't going to stop. Recently announced Trump appointees for law enforcement have said on the campaign that they — they were out for retribution, and I think we should believe their words, right? We should believe what they say. Uh — the sentencing was coming up, as you all know. There was a sentencing coming up and the President said this in his statement that Hunter and his family had been through enough. Enough is enough, and he wrestled with these circumstances — uh — these change in circumstances ultimately — uh — and the combination of that — uh — the present changing his mind and issuing certainly led to the present changing his mind and issuing this pardon, and one thing that I do want to point to, which I think is important, is what Congressman James Clyburn said — uh — when he was interviewed. He said, I am absolutely okay with it. Uh — I don't know how many people urge him to do so, but I did. Uh — he seemed to be reticent about it. This is what Clyburn said — uh — when he spoke to the President two weeks ago — uh — but I emphasize continuing his — his quote — uh — emphasized the fact that we as fathers have obligations to our children, so that was a conversation that the congressman himself had with the President two — two weeks ago, said that the President was reticent when he encouraged the President to do so, and this weekend — uh — he thought about it — uh — and he weighed, he — it was not an easy decision to — to come to — and he put out a comprehensive — uh — comprehensive statement, and I would certainly — um — you know, offer that up to folks out there who are wondering, I would say, please read the president's, uh, President's response to this in full.”

Curtis Houck

102,998 просмотров • 1 год назад

Tucker Carlson on Pat Buchanan: "Well, I mean, you know, it's perfectly valid to to question America's relationship with Israel. Israel has a lobby. It's perfectly fair, as far as I'm concerned, to beat up on Israel's lobby. Um, but that's I don't think that's the reason that Buchanan is being labeled an anti-semite. this kind of, as I've said, this this relentless um this relentless bringing up topics related to uh Judaism. I mean, famously Pat, you know, always beats up on Goldman Sachs, but never Morgan Stanley. I mean, it's it's really hard to there is no point at which Pat Buchanan has held a press conference and said, you know, I really don't like the Jews, I think they're a sinister force in America. But I think um and it took me years to come to this uh to this position. I mean, I'm not throwing the the term anti-semite around. Um, but you you reach a point when you say, "Well, gee, you know, here's a guy who has gone out of his way to to defend Myanuk and other accused um Nazi war criminals, who's constantly attacked Israel, who's attacked uh American Jews for supporting Israel unduly, who's implied that American Jews push America into wars in which non-Jews die. There really is um and again I'm not hysterical on this subject but I do believe uh that there is a pattern um with Pat Buchanan of needling the Jews. Is that anti-Semitic? Yeah. I mean after a while you conclude it is in some sense anti-semitic. I mean Pat Buchanan obviously has a lot of personal and affectionate relationships with people who are Jewish. Um so on a personal level perhaps he's not, but on a different maybe thematic level I think he probably is." - Tucker Carlson on C-SPAN Washington Journal September 24, 1999. Every single word of this applies to 2025 Tucker. He knows exactly what he's doing.

Yehuda Teitelbaum

59,376 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад