Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Honestly, DirectQuery is for the rich! Set your expectations right. You cannot optimize DirectQuery to perform like Import mode. #Honestly #powerbi #directquery

12,921 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ed Hansberry - MVP
Ed Hansberry - MVPvor 1 Jahr

Everyone that talks to their Snowflake sales rep will be told DQ is the best when working with Snowflake data. Yea, it can perform decently, but still pales in comparison to import. The main reason is money flies from your bank account to Snowflakes with each visual query processed. 💸💸💸💸

Profilbild von Micah Dail
Micah Dailvor 1 Jahr

I do prefer avoiding DQ, but just about every model we have has DQ with aggregates. I can't get away!

Profilbild von Marco Russo
Marco Russovor 1 Jahr

You are certainly aware of pros/cons. Many people don’t, so I tried to simplify the message. 😎

Profilbild von Daniel Dickler
Daniel Dicklervor 1 Jahr

Honestly, with live connections to SSAS multi-dimensional model cubes you do not have all these performance headaches.

Profilbild von Marco Russo
Marco Russovor 1 Jahr

Long live to Multidimensional!

Profilbild von Thomas Ivarsson
Thomas Ivarssonvor 1 Jahr

When you cannot import data into Power BI with an acceptable time window then DQ can be interesting. I have not met that scenario so far.

Profilbild von Mathew Westwood
Mathew Westwoodvor 1 Jahr

You always talk sense Marco and always appreciated 👏

Profilbild von NYCGuy1463
NYCGuy1463vor 1 Jahr

What if you get a fresh set of information every month across multiple tables ? DQ allows the new data to just flow in.

Profilbild von Marco Russo
Marco Russovor 1 Jahr

I don't get the point. You refresh every month. Unless you want to spend more for each query, of course. Your choice.

Profilbild von dinesh
dineshvor 1 Jahr

Please share your opinion on direct lake by comparing with import mode from performance point of view.

Ähnliche Videos