How can you distinguish science from pseudoscience?

So true in so many levels

The secret to kids learning faster and better has been known since 1960. But it’s been impossible to implement. Technology is just starting to catch up, so we can finally use what we’ve known for years to radically change how we educate kids. Want to learn how? Read this:

You can’t distinguish science from pseudoscience… For example: many of the early pioneers of Quantum Physics saw that their investigations had Eastern Mysticism and Quantum Physics pointing to each other… But current scientists will lose their funding if they suggest such things. So current science isn’t science, it is a quest to do nothing that will interfere with their rice bowl… Just shrug it off that Oppenheimer quoted the Bhagavad Gita first thing when he saw the Trinity Test. Or that Niels Bohr used symbolism of Eastern Mysticism for his coat of arms when the King of Denmark gave him a title. Create the pejorative term Quantum Mystic to downplay such perceptions…

Dead vs Dead

In this confusing moment, the first step of the scientific community is to admit that something beyond humans exists. If an unknown energy source can move a Raphia body, we must first admit this phenomenon:

Let's agree with the basics first. The Testimony of neurosurgeon Eben Alexander and the work of the child psychiatrist Jim B. Tucker cannot be overlooked. Let's start from there:

I agree

He said this over 30 years ago. How bad is it now vs 1990s?

He used 'economical' in a wrong way.

I am the one talking science at home's dinner table everyday... mom listens, sometimes she adds. My dad just stays quiet till she interrupts with anything he can so because he can't stand the conversation he can't follow anymore.

@grok podrias subtitular en español?