Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

How did the New York caste bill quietly die this legislative session? And why didn't HAF sound the alarm every step of the way? Because HAF was busy doing the work. Effective advocacy isn't always loud. While public campaigns have their place, reactive social media posts and mass action... alerts can sometimes energize opponents or turn legislators into performers rather than partners. HAF chose discernment over spectacle, a strategy that recently helped make New York the sixth state where efforts to add caste as a category in non-discrimination laws have been successfully opposed. That work looked like HAF attorneys developing constitutional arguments, policy experts tracking legislation around the clock, and countless face-to-face meetings with lawmakers and staff. It meant asking difficult questions, publishing op-eds and legal analyses, and building relationships that extend beyond any single bill. The work isn't over. Well-funded efforts continue, which is why HAF's advocacy continues too. If you value thoughtful, effective representation for Hindu Americans, invest in the work that makes outcomes like this possible. To donate, visitshow more

Hindu American Foundation

91,496 subscribers

16,980 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 18

Фото профиля Mihir Meghani

Mihir Meghani3 месяцев назад

This is why if you are in the United States and reading this, you should support the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) with a donation at

Фото профиля Sam

Sam3 месяцев назад

@indumathi37 You guys are amazing

Фото профиля Cheng1964

Cheng19643 месяцев назад

Deny Caste. 1. There is no word for caste. 2. Caste connotation = ELite/ weakth/ Power proximity and keeping others away. But Brahmins were not allowed by doctrine to have wealth/ power/ nor were elite! We had the opposite of caste. 3. Racists = fake narratives

Фото профиля Rajesh Chandra

Rajesh Chandra3 месяцев назад

The legislation did not succeed because, once again, upper caste Hindus prevailes over the lower castes.

Фото профиля janamari ಜಾಣಮರಿ

janamari ಜಾಣಮರಿ3 месяцев назад

@Sangi_shankar21 Thank you HAF 🙏

Фото профиля Sandeep Rawat

Sandeep Rawat3 месяцев назад

Keep up the good work 👏

Фото профиля Krishna Kumar N.P.

Krishna Kumar N.P.3 месяцев назад

👍

Фото профиля Sreedhar Ravinutala శ్రీధర్‌ రావినూతల

Sreedhar Ravinutala శ్రీధర్‌ రావినూతల3 месяцев назад

🙏🙏🙏

Фото профиля Look at you

Look at you3 месяцев назад

And in other news, Hindus this week:

Фото профиля Kool

Kool3 месяцев назад

Thank You for your service

Фото профиля Tell It Like It Is

Tell It Like It Is3 месяцев назад

Why are you reactive instead of proactive in stopping these things? I want a headline that says 'HAF stops its wikipedia attack" - before it even happens.

Фото профиля Zafar

Zafar3 месяцев назад

Why is this a good thing? Supporting caste protections is not anti-Hindu. It is anti-discrimination. It is pro-dignity.

Фото профиля true genral

true genral3 месяцев назад

So no more caste ???

Фото профиля Emperor Skepsis

Emperor Skepsis3 месяцев назад

you know why this type of legislation is shot down...because its America where there are no castes, there are just 3rd world slop heads importing their tribal culture...self-deport so we can remain caste-less

Фото профиля ಹಂಸಾನಂದಿ Hamsanandi हंसानन्दि

ಹಂಸಾನಂದಿ Hamsanandi हंसानन्दि3 месяцев назад

🙏👍

Фото профиля proud-citizen

proud-citizen3 месяцев назад

Keep up the good work

Фото профиля Ajay Date (दाते)

Ajay Date (दाते)3 месяцев назад

Brilliant!

Фото профиля Losnewf

Losnewf3 месяцев назад

I am a fan of HAFs advocacy. But why are we fighting to not add caste to non-discrimination law?? I think all of us agree that Caste is a primitive concept that we need to get rid off, Right?

Похожие видео

Thomas Massie blocked a plan to give AI data centers immunity from local and state laws. Twice. And he blocked a plan to give pesticide companies immunity to mass poison Americans. “It’s cronyism.” “The first version of the Big Bill had a provision that would let data centers ignore state laws.” “And not just state laws, but local zoning laws.” “Marjorie Taylor Greene and I fought to get that taken out, and it was taken out, fortunately.” “That issue came up again recently in my Judiciary Committee.” “We were marking up eight bills one day in a work session, and I noticed that number six on the list was to exempt data centers from eight different environmental laws.” “They couldn’t be sued if they didn’t have the permits.” “Even though some of those environmental laws may be onerous, I don’t know why you would give an exemption to data centers, but not to the farmers or other industries.” “So I tweeted about it, in real time, blew the whistle, and they decided to take it off of the schedule that day.” “I have obstructed things like special privileges and immunities for data centers.” “And most recently in the Farm Bill, they had a provision that was gonna give special privileges and immunities … to Monsanto-Bayer, which makes glyphosate.” “They said, we’ll give every pesticide immunity from all state labeling laws.” “Myself and some other colleagues worked hard, we drafted amendments.” “We forced it to a vote on the floor of the House and took that special provision … removed from the Farm Bill.” “And I did vote for the Farm Bill because it has my signature piece of legislation in it, which is a bill to make it easier for farmers to use a local processor and sell their beef, pork, and lamb directly to consumers.” This is why the deep state is desperately trying to oust him from Congress right now. And it’s why he needs the people to rally behind him now more than ever. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Thomas Massie blocked a plan to give AI data centers immunity from local and state laws. Twice. And he blocked a plan to give pesticide companies immunity to mass poison Americans. “It’s cronyism.” “The first version of the Big Bill had a provision that would let data centers ignore state laws.” “And not just state laws, but local zoning laws.” “Marjorie Taylor Greene and I fought to get that taken out, and it was taken out, fortunately.” “That issue came up again recently in my Judiciary Committee.” “We were marking up eight bills one day in a work session, and I noticed that number six on the list was to exempt data centers from eight different environmental laws.” “They couldn’t be sued if they didn’t have the permits.” “Even though some of those environmental laws may be onerous, I don’t know why you would give an exemption to data centers, but not to the farmers or other industries.” “So I tweeted about it, in real time, blew the whistle, and they decided to take it off of the schedule that day.” “I have obstructed things like special privileges and immunities for data centers.” “And most recently in the Farm Bill, they had a provision that was gonna give special privileges and immunities … to Monsanto-Bayer, which makes glyphosate.” “They said, we’ll give every pesticide immunity from all state labeling laws.” “Myself and some other colleagues worked hard, we drafted amendments.” “We forced it to a vote on the floor of the House and took that special provision … removed from the Farm Bill.” “And I did vote for the Farm Bill because it has my signature piece of legislation in it, which is a bill to make it easier for farmers to use a local processor and sell their beef, pork, and lamb directly to consumers.” This is why the deep state is desperately trying to oust him from Congress right now. And it’s why he needs the people to rally behind him now more than ever. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Holden Culotta

100,695 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

New York resident is upset over getting a text message for new free Medicaid work requirements She says this is “stupid and dumb and f*cking ableist” She has already called in and found a way around these new requirements because she doesn’t want to work but she wants free healthcare She says all you need to do is have your doctors write the state a doctors note that says you can’t work and they’ll keep you on the free healthcare…. And I looked into it and it’s actually true. All they have to do is say they have issues like mental health or other impairments and they’ll keep their free health insurance We are being robbed blind by all these people who just don’t want to work and pretend to have disabilities This is the reason why people are against universal healthcare.. its the blatant abuse

New York resident is upset over getting a text message for new free Medicaid work requirements She says this is “stupid and dumb and f*cking ableist” She has already called in and found a way around these new requirements because she doesn’t want to work but she wants free healthcare She says all you need to do is have your doctors write the state a doctors note that says you can’t work and they’ll keep you on the free healthcare…. And I looked into it and it’s actually true. All they have to do is say they have issues like mental health or other impairments and they’ll keep their free health insurance We are being robbed blind by all these people who just don’t want to work and pretend to have disabilities This is the reason why people are against universal healthcare.. its the blatant abuse

Wall Street Apes

175,959 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Every single Democrat And every single Republican Voted yes on our bitcoin strategic reserve bill Here is how we did it 👇🏼 First, I was lucky enough to partner with someone whose truly passionate about the Bitcoin and Digital Asset community Representative Webster Barnaby has been a Bitcoin champion for a very long time And has been a key reason our legislation has done so well in the House What you don’t see is the huge amounts of work that go into whipping votes for these bills Constant meeting with legislators, staffers, governors offices, committee chairs Discussing sometimes line by line the bill we are pushing Just getting the bill heard in committee is harder then you may think The other secret is working with Joshua Jake Josh and I have worked together on a variety of media and political stratagems over the years now And it’s safe to say that if the both of us decide to push something, it’s going to happen Working with Josh on media strategy is incredibly fun and very important Media matters This legislation is just the beginning and with the team we have, the potential this bill has is unstoppable And this will not be the only bill we push And Florida will not be the only state we push it in

Every single Democrat And every single Republican Voted yes on our bitcoin strategic reserve bill Here is how we did it 👇🏼 First, I was lucky enough to partner with someone whose truly passionate about the Bitcoin and Digital Asset community Representative Webster Barnaby has been a Bitcoin champion for a very long time And has been a key reason our legislation has done so well in the House What you don’t see is the huge amounts of work that go into whipping votes for these bills Constant meeting with legislators, staffers, governors offices, committee chairs Discussing sometimes line by line the bill we are pushing Just getting the bill heard in committee is harder then you may think The other secret is working with Joshua Jake Josh and I have worked together on a variety of media and political stratagems over the years now And it’s safe to say that if the both of us decide to push something, it’s going to happen Working with Josh on media strategy is incredibly fun and very important Media matters This legislation is just the beginning and with the team we have, the potential this bill has is unstoppable And this will not be the only bill we push And Florida will not be the only state we push it in

Samuel Armes

22,398 просмотров • 1 год назад

IT’S NOTHING BUT A TROJAN HORSE A few hours ago, Labor introduced the ‘Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024’ into Parliament. And rather than the Bill set out how X (and the other platforms will police if Australians are 16 or over before they log on - in their typical dishonest and deceptive way of doing things - the Bill hands those powers to the eSafety Commissar to work out for herself, at a later date. The eSafety Commissar has demonstrated she is unfit to have such powers. You can bet this unelected bureaucrat will take it upon herself to make it as difficult and intrusive as possible for Australians to Log on to X. This legislation has nothing to do with "protecting the children" - it’s a smoke screen, a Trojan Horse to give eSafety Karen more power to force Australians to have government controlled biometric Digital ID and to make it more difficult for Australians to log on to X. THIS BILL MUST BE OPPOSED BY FREEDOM LOVING AUSTRALIANS - it gives too much power to the eSafety Commissar. The text of the Bill The Explanatory Memorandum

IT’S NOTHING BUT A TROJAN HORSE A few hours ago, Labor introduced the ‘Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024’ into Parliament. And rather than the Bill set out how X (and the other platforms will police if Australians are 16 or over before they log on - in their typical dishonest and deceptive way of doing things - the Bill hands those powers to the eSafety Commissar to work out for herself, at a later date. The eSafety Commissar has demonstrated she is unfit to have such powers. You can bet this unelected bureaucrat will take it upon herself to make it as difficult and intrusive as possible for Australians to Log on to X. This legislation has nothing to do with "protecting the children" - it’s a smoke screen, a Trojan Horse to give eSafety Karen more power to force Australians to have government controlled biometric Digital ID and to make it more difficult for Australians to log on to X. THIS BILL MUST BE OPPOSED BY FREEDOM LOVING AUSTRALIANS - it gives too much power to the eSafety Commissar. The text of the Bill The Explanatory Memorandum

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

76,940 просмотров • 1 год назад

Here's how Elon Musk found out Bill Gates has no basic physics. Gates showed up at Tesla Austin certain a long-range Semi could never work. Energy density? Efficiency? He didn't have a single number. Elon Musk: "You’d think that someone like Bill Gates, who clearly started a technology company that’s one of the biggest companies in the world—Microsoft—you’d think he’d be really quite strong in the sciences. But actually, at least from my direct conversations with him, he is not strong in the sciences. This was really surprising. He came to visit me at the Tesla Gigafactory in Austin and was telling me that it’s impossible to have a long-range semi-truck. And I was like, “Well, but we literally have them. And you can drive them. And Pepsi is literally using them right now. And you can drive them yourself or send someone. Obviously, Bill Gates is not going to drive it himself, but you can send a trusted person to drive the truck and verify that it can do the things that we say it’s doing.” And he’s like, “No, no, it doesn’t work. It doesn’t work.” And I’m like, “Okay.” I’m kind of stuck there. Then I was like, “Well, so it must be that you disagree with the watt-hours per kilogram of the battery pack. You must think that perhaps we can’t achieve the energy density of the battery pack, or that the watt-hours per mile of the truck is too high, and that when you combine those two numbers, the range is low. “And so, which one of those numbers do you think we have wrong, and what numbers do you think are correct?” And he didn’t know any of the numbers. And I’m like, “Well then, doesn’t it seem that it’s perhaps premature to conclude that a long-range semi cannot work if you do not know the energy density of the battery pack or the energy efficiency of the truck chassis?”

Here's how Elon Musk found out Bill Gates has no basic physics. Gates showed up at Tesla Austin certain a long-range Semi could never work. Energy density? Efficiency? He didn't have a single number. Elon Musk: "You’d think that someone like Bill Gates, who clearly started a technology company that’s one of the biggest companies in the world—Microsoft—you’d think he’d be really quite strong in the sciences. But actually, at least from my direct conversations with him, he is not strong in the sciences. This was really surprising. He came to visit me at the Tesla Gigafactory in Austin and was telling me that it’s impossible to have a long-range semi-truck. And I was like, “Well, but we literally have them. And you can drive them. And Pepsi is literally using them right now. And you can drive them yourself or send someone. Obviously, Bill Gates is not going to drive it himself, but you can send a trusted person to drive the truck and verify that it can do the things that we say it’s doing.” And he’s like, “No, no, it doesn’t work. It doesn’t work.” And I’m like, “Okay.” I’m kind of stuck there. Then I was like, “Well, so it must be that you disagree with the watt-hours per kilogram of the battery pack. You must think that perhaps we can’t achieve the energy density of the battery pack, or that the watt-hours per mile of the truck is too high, and that when you combine those two numbers, the range is low. “And so, which one of those numbers do you think we have wrong, and what numbers do you think are correct?” And he didn’t know any of the numbers. And I’m like, “Well then, doesn’t it seem that it’s perhaps premature to conclude that a long-range semi cannot work if you do not know the energy density of the battery pack or the energy efficiency of the truck chassis?”

Doge Tipping

158,215 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Over 200 facial recognition cameras were installed in New Orleans and have been scanning Americans faces 24/7 The police worked with a NGO to go through data and profile Americans for arrest using artificial intelligence “You know about all the facial recognition cameras in New Orleans, right? Oh, you mean you didn't notice the over 200 cameras scanning faces 24/7? Well, they're here, and many are located in the city's French Quarter. For years, over 15 million people who visit this neighborhood annually have been quietly documented while local police were automatically notified if AI software found a match to a person of interest. The problem? AI isn't always accurate, and it has more errors among people with darker skin tones, women, children, and the elderly. Because of these limitations, privacy experts agree that AI-generated facial recognition matches will lead to wrongful arrests. Which is why when the New Orleans City Council first allowed police to use facial recognition technology in 2022, they chose to protect privacy and ban any mass generalized surveillance of the public, except the police did it anyway with the help of a local nonprofit that owns and operates the cameras. It wasn't until the spring of 2025 that the AI-generated alerts were first revealed to the public and turned off. So for now, the AI-generated alerts remain paused, but the facial recognition cameras, they'll remain while New Orleans debates whether or not to be the first US city to give law enforcement the power to track residents and tourists in real time”

Wall Street Apes

64,632 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

When I launched Attention Copilot, I mostly thought of it as a way to help people get unstuck in one session: Bring a task that feels ugh, reconnect with why it matters, and do it while a coach tracks your attention and inner state. When resistance shows up, we work with it in the moment instead of just talking about it or white-knuckling through it. That still feels core! But after watching people work with us over weeks and months, one pattern stands out: important work is where this stuff shows up. The work that matters asks for more clarity, courage, patience, or focus than your default habits make easy. So when you practice working with resistance while actually doing it, your relationship to work starts to change. For some people, especially at high-growth startups, this looks very practical. Everything wants your attention, and sessions protect time to get clear on what matters, do deep work, and move it forward. For others, AC feels like finally bringing meditation and inner work into the work itself, right when the reactive patterns show up. Either way, the training rep is the same: stay with what matters, work with what comes up, move the thing forward, and get better at doing that outside the session too. A few of the people we’ve worked with for a while put it better than I can!

When I launched Attention Copilot, I mostly thought of it as a way to help people get unstuck in one session: Bring a task that feels ugh, reconnect with why it matters, and do it while a coach tracks your attention and inner state. When resistance shows up, we work with it in the moment instead of just talking about it or white-knuckling through it. That still feels core! But after watching people work with us over weeks and months, one pattern stands out: important work is where this stuff shows up. The work that matters asks for more clarity, courage, patience, or focus than your default habits make easy. So when you practice working with resistance while actually doing it, your relationship to work starts to change. For some people, especially at high-growth startups, this looks very practical. Everything wants your attention, and sessions protect time to get clear on what matters, do deep work, and move it forward. For others, AC feels like finally bringing meditation and inner work into the work itself, right when the reactive patterns show up. Either way, the training rep is the same: stay with what matters, work with what comes up, move the thing forward, and get better at doing that outside the session too. A few of the people we’ve worked with for a while put it better than I can!

Pranab

12,906 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The same kinds of productivity gains we've seen in coding with AI agents are heading to the rest of knowledge work. This is the jump when you go from having a chatbot to being able to actually have an agent go off and do work for minutes or even hours and come back with a complete work output that you then review. Here's an example of the new Box Agent filling out an RFP response from an existing knowledge base. This process would normally take hours to fill out, and requires the full attention of the user doing the work. Now, you provide the Box Agent with the RFP questions, and it will go off, make a plan, extract all the relevant questions, read through existing source material to come up with an answer, and then generate a new word document as the final output. All while you're doing something else. The key to this architecture is that the agent is able to use all of the same tools in the background that a user uses to get work done. The agent can search for documents, read entire files, run scripts and tools in the background, and even be able to write code on the fly to automate tasks it hasn't seen before. And best of all, the Box Agent will (soon) work from the Box MCP and CLI so you can invoke it in any agentic system as a step in a process. This kind of agent complexity would have been impossible even 6 months ago. Models consistently failed at tracking long running tasks or using the right tools at the right moment for the task. But this is all now possible because of models like GPT-5.4, Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3, and is only getting better by the month. Just as we moved from engineers writing code and using AI as an assistant to answer questions, in many areas of knowledge work -like legal, finance, consulting, sales, marketing, and more- when we have a problem we'll just kick off the AI agent to just go work on it for us in the background.

The same kinds of productivity gains we've seen in coding with AI agents are heading to the rest of knowledge work. This is the jump when you go from having a chatbot to being able to actually have an agent go off and do work for minutes or even hours and come back with a complete work output that you then review. Here's an example of the new Box Agent filling out an RFP response from an existing knowledge base. This process would normally take hours to fill out, and requires the full attention of the user doing the work. Now, you provide the Box Agent with the RFP questions, and it will go off, make a plan, extract all the relevant questions, read through existing source material to come up with an answer, and then generate a new word document as the final output. All while you're doing something else. The key to this architecture is that the agent is able to use all of the same tools in the background that a user uses to get work done. The agent can search for documents, read entire files, run scripts and tools in the background, and even be able to write code on the fly to automate tasks it hasn't seen before. And best of all, the Box Agent will (soon) work from the Box MCP and CLI so you can invoke it in any agentic system as a step in a process. This kind of agent complexity would have been impossible even 6 months ago. Models consistently failed at tracking long running tasks or using the right tools at the right moment for the task. But this is all now possible because of models like GPT-5.4, Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3, and is only getting better by the month. Just as we moved from engineers writing code and using AI as an assistant to answer questions, in many areas of knowledge work -like legal, finance, consulting, sales, marketing, and more- when we have a problem we'll just kick off the AI agent to just go work on it for us in the background.

Aaron Levie

24,728 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Recently at a talk I was giving a gentleman tried to make the point that the reason Sir Keir is perceived to be a bad Prime Minister is because of social media. I politely responded that the reason Starmer is getting a "bollocking" (a word not introduced into the conversation by me) is because he is absolutely and objectively terrible. What's more he's presiding over a system of government that the Labour Party created, that serves absolutely nobody other than people like him and his civil service and lawyer friends. Now that people have realised it doesn't work, and now that many of them have decided they'll vote Reform, he's throwing around smears like confetti; claiming if you're not in love with the mass immigration heaped on this country in the last few years you're nothing but a racist. Sorry Starmer, the public isn't buying it. Click here for the full exchange:

Recently at a talk I was giving a gentleman tried to make the point that the reason Sir Keir is perceived to be a bad Prime Minister is because of social media. I politely responded that the reason Starmer is getting a "bollocking" (a word not introduced into the conversation by me) is because he is absolutely and objectively terrible. What's more he's presiding over a system of government that the Labour Party created, that serves absolutely nobody other than people like him and his civil service and lawyer friends. Now that people have realised it doesn't work, and now that many of them have decided they'll vote Reform, he's throwing around smears like confetti; claiming if you're not in love with the mass immigration heaped on this country in the last few years you're nothing but a racist. Sorry Starmer, the public isn't buying it. Click here for the full exchange:

David Starkey

478,212 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

The All-In Podcast

55,036 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The sanctum sanctorum of ANY place of worship is subject to rules and open only to AUTHORIZED personnel. Hindu temples all over the world welcome a wide variety of visitors and devotees. In this short video, CoHNA’s Dalit and Bahujan leaders share their own lived experiences of inclusion and acceptance in temples across the US. If New York media is interested in Dalit Bahujan voices, we encourage them to listen and find out more. Yashica Dutt and Hindus for Human Rights are literally trying to deny Hindu spaces the most basic rights of access, security, and authorization. Let that sink in. We can also see they have no knowledge of how Hindu temples work, because the inner sanctum is always reserved for those with the authority and training to enter and execute a skilled job. And yes, the job of a Hindu priest is a skilled one, requiring years of study and training. We ask any of these caste warriors trying to paint Hindu temples as “exclusionary” for not having open access to anyone at any time - just try walking into ANY office or shop and demanding access to their inner spaces without authorization! Show up at your local tax-payer funded school and ask to sit in the chair of the school Principal for even an hour or demand to handle the trophies on display. Try walking into your city council meeting without an invitation and demand to sit at the table reserved for councilors. Go to your local grocery store, Target or Walmart and complain if the cashier does not allow you to “touch” the cash register. Try entering a pulpit without authorization or asking to touch sacred relics in places of worship that are not Hindu. This narrative is in line with their previous attempts to demonize Hindus and create double standards in law and policy. These fake allegations and tropes were used to build a witch hunt in California prior to the introduction of the infamous caste bill by State Senator Aisha Wahab (SB 403). Now, there is an attempt to revive and recycle those tired tropes to create a two-tier society in New York State. City & State NY

The sanctum sanctorum of ANY place of worship is subject to rules and open only to AUTHORIZED personnel. Hindu temples all over the world welcome a wide variety of visitors and devotees. In this short video, CoHNA’s Dalit and Bahujan leaders share their own lived experiences of inclusion and acceptance in temples across the US. If New York media is interested in Dalit Bahujan voices, we encourage them to listen and find out more. Yashica Dutt and Hindus for Human Rights are literally trying to deny Hindu spaces the most basic rights of access, security, and authorization. Let that sink in. We can also see they have no knowledge of how Hindu temples work, because the inner sanctum is always reserved for those with the authority and training to enter and execute a skilled job. And yes, the job of a Hindu priest is a skilled one, requiring years of study and training. We ask any of these caste warriors trying to paint Hindu temples as “exclusionary” for not having open access to anyone at any time - just try walking into ANY office or shop and demanding access to their inner spaces without authorization! Show up at your local tax-payer funded school and ask to sit in the chair of the school Principal for even an hour or demand to handle the trophies on display. Try walking into your city council meeting without an invitation and demand to sit at the table reserved for councilors. Go to your local grocery store, Target or Walmart and complain if the cashier does not allow you to “touch” the cash register. Try entering a pulpit without authorization or asking to touch sacred relics in places of worship that are not Hindu. This narrative is in line with their previous attempts to demonize Hindus and create double standards in law and policy. These fake allegations and tropes were used to build a witch hunt in California prior to the introduction of the infamous caste bill by State Senator Aisha Wahab (SB 403). Now, there is an attempt to revive and recycle those tired tropes to create a two-tier society in New York State. City & State NY

CoHNA (Coalition of Hindus of North America)

10,276 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Woah. Bret Weinstein just revealed that a 2012 law quietly dismantled the Bill of Rights. And almost no one noticed. “All the rights in the Bill of Rights became privileges the day that Barack Obama signed NDAA 2012.” “The NDAA of 2012 … said: until the end of hostilities in the Global War on Terror, we can pull you off any street in the world.” “We don’t have to admit that we have you.” “You don’t have the right to see a lawyer, to see the evidence against you.” “All that has to happen is the President needs to decide that you’re a terrorist or a supporter of them.” And a federal court ruling later decided that we don’t even know how many people have been legally disappeared under that law. “Lots of people are missing.” “We don’t know if any of those are missing because of the provisions of NDAA 2012.” Obama signed the NDAA 2012 on December 31. Why is that important? “By signing late in the day on New Year’s Eve in Hawaii, the rest of the country was already drunk, and it didn’t show up in The New York Times the next day.” Leslie Manookian: “This is why I say we live in a post-constitutional order.” “In that same NDAA, they repealed the Smith-Mundt Act … which prohibited the CIA from propagandizing Americans.” “They said: don’t worry, we’re not setting up a program, and we don’t have any funding for it.” “Well, in 2015 and 2016, they set up the program and funded it.” Bret Weinstein Leslie Manookian

Woah. Bret Weinstein just revealed that a 2012 law quietly dismantled the Bill of Rights. And almost no one noticed. “All the rights in the Bill of Rights became privileges the day that Barack Obama signed NDAA 2012.” “The NDAA of 2012 … said: until the end of hostilities in the Global War on Terror, we can pull you off any street in the world.” “We don’t have to admit that we have you.” “You don’t have the right to see a lawyer, to see the evidence against you.” “All that has to happen is the President needs to decide that you’re a terrorist or a supporter of them.” And a federal court ruling later decided that we don’t even know how many people have been legally disappeared under that law. “Lots of people are missing.” “We don’t know if any of those are missing because of the provisions of NDAA 2012.” Obama signed the NDAA 2012 on December 31. Why is that important? “By signing late in the day on New Year’s Eve in Hawaii, the rest of the country was already drunk, and it didn’t show up in The New York Times the next day.” Leslie Manookian: “This is why I say we live in a post-constitutional order.” “In that same NDAA, they repealed the Smith-Mundt Act … which prohibited the CIA from propagandizing Americans.” “They said: don’t worry, we’re not setting up a program, and we don’t have any funding for it.” “Well, in 2015 and 2016, they set up the program and funded it.” Bret Weinstein Leslie Manookian

Holden Culotta

368,953 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

In 1960, 60% of young Americans one year into their first marriage owned their home. By 2023, that had fallen to 42%. Walter Russell Mead (Walter Russell Mead) has a theory for why homeownership feels out of reach, and how we can fix it: "The single family home in the suburbs replaced the single family farm. Think about not only building the freeways and the highways, but subsidies through the tax code so that municipal bonds are tax-free, which means towns can build the infrastructure that attracts developers and homeowners, who then raise the value of the property, so you can repay the bonds out of the higher property values the infrastructure has created. Tis kind of wealth-creating machine. Right now we seem to be reaching the limits of that wealth-creating machine, because it's just too expensive for the average person to buy a house and land close enough to where you work so the commute isn't killing you. Homeownership is one of the real big problems for why young people are unhappy with the economy. Between remote work and hybrid work and self-driving cars, if you only have to go into work once or twice a week, you can work farther out. If you expand the commuting radius from 40 miles to 75 miles, the amount of land that is developable for housing goes up with the square of the radius. It's geometric. Information technology appropriately deployed can open up for another two generations this wealth-creating machine."

In 1960, 60% of young Americans one year into their first marriage owned their home. By 2023, that had fallen to 42%. Walter Russell Mead (Walter Russell Mead) has a theory for why homeownership feels out of reach, and how we can fix it: "The single family home in the suburbs replaced the single family farm. Think about not only building the freeways and the highways, but subsidies through the tax code so that municipal bonds are tax-free, which means towns can build the infrastructure that attracts developers and homeowners, who then raise the value of the property, so you can repay the bonds out of the higher property values the infrastructure has created. Tis kind of wealth-creating machine. Right now we seem to be reaching the limits of that wealth-creating machine, because it's just too expensive for the average person to buy a house and land close enough to where you work so the commute isn't killing you. Homeownership is one of the real big problems for why young people are unhappy with the economy. Between remote work and hybrid work and self-driving cars, if you only have to go into work once or twice a week, you can work farther out. If you expand the commuting radius from 40 miles to 75 miles, the amount of land that is developable for housing goes up with the square of the radius. It's geometric. Information technology appropriately deployed can open up for another two generations this wealth-creating machine."

Invest Like the Best

12,679 просмотров • 6 дней назад

#WATCH | Delhi | On RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat's statement in New York, Congress leader Mumtaz Patel says, "The situation in the country is dire, and when you go abroad and make these statements, this isn't a real floor test to explain Hindutva. As an Indian Muslim, I'll say it again: Muslims still face difficulty finding a home in India. Go to Gujarat, even to sign a rent agreement, my family has been struggling for the past six months, unable to reach a rent agreement because the property is in a Hindu area. So, these everyday hardships, along with the way minorities are treated, repeatedly reminded that this isn't their country. If you have something to say, you have the right to go to Pakistan and say it. If Mohan Bhagwat can implement this in India and convince the people here that we are all Indians, whether in the minority or in the majority, and that this country belongs to all of us, I would welcome it. But speaking like this in a foreign country is meaningless."

#WATCH | Delhi | On RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat's statement in New York, Congress leader Mumtaz Patel says, "The situation in the country is dire, and when you go abroad and make these statements, this isn't a real floor test to explain Hindutva. As an Indian Muslim, I'll say it again: Muslims still face difficulty finding a home in India. Go to Gujarat, even to sign a rent agreement, my family has been struggling for the past six months, unable to reach a rent agreement because the property is in a Hindu area. So, these everyday hardships, along with the way minorities are treated, repeatedly reminded that this isn't their country. If you have something to say, you have the right to go to Pakistan and say it. If Mohan Bhagwat can implement this in India and convince the people here that we are all Indians, whether in the minority or in the majority, and that this country belongs to all of us, I would welcome it. But speaking like this in a foreign country is meaningless."

ANI

120,050 просмотров • 18 дней назад

🚨 HOLY CRAP! In the briefing room, Karoline Leavitt ERUPTS on the leftist insurrection in Minnesota being propped up by Democrat officials, says it DOESN'T HAPPEN in red states like Florida "It's truly SHAMEFUL that now for more than a YEAR, you've had elected Democrat governors and mayors who have basically held their state and local law enforcement HOSTAGE and told them you cannot cooperate with federal law enforcement!" "Why? It's because these Democrats are DERANGED in their hatred for President Trump, and they are holding their state and local law enforcement hostage as a result!" "And these Democrat mayors and governors are doing this over what? Over the lawful and legitimate law enforcement operations to remove violent criminals from the streets of Minnesota, from the streets of California, from the streets of New York, and from the streets of every state across this country." "And you don't see these riots and this vandalism taking place in states like Florida. Why? Because you have a governor in that state who has empowered federal and local authorities to work together!" "And it's DESPICABLE what we're seeing from these Democrat politicians, especially in sanctuary states and cities across the country."

🚨 HOLY CRAP! In the briefing room, Karoline Leavitt ERUPTS on the leftist insurrection in Minnesota being propped up by Democrat officials, says it DOESN'T HAPPEN in red states like Florida "It's truly SHAMEFUL that now for more than a YEAR, you've had elected Democrat governors and mayors who have basically held their state and local law enforcement HOSTAGE and told them you cannot cooperate with federal law enforcement!" "Why? It's because these Democrats are DERANGED in their hatred for President Trump, and they are holding their state and local law enforcement hostage as a result!" "And these Democrat mayors and governors are doing this over what? Over the lawful and legitimate law enforcement operations to remove violent criminals from the streets of Minnesota, from the streets of California, from the streets of New York, and from the streets of every state across this country." "And you don't see these riots and this vandalism taking place in states like Florida. Why? Because you have a governor in that state who has empowered federal and local authorities to work together!" "And it's DESPICABLE what we're seeing from these Democrat politicians, especially in sanctuary states and cities across the country."

Eric Daugherty

45,645 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Why did so many languages copy async/await from C#? Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of TypeScript, C# & Turbo Pascal - on what they got right with the design: #1 - async/await was designed to solve a common problem in the event-loop model: "A lot of languages are built around cooperative multitasking in the sense that they have an event loop that sits and dispatches events. Then you handle the event and then you yield back to the event handler loop. And it all runs in a single thread cooperatively. The problem with that is if you then want to do some long running work: how do I stop in the middle of this piece of long running work and yield back to the event loop cooperatively? And then when my result is ready, I can come back and continue executing here." #2 - state machines are the solution, but hard to build: "Well, in order to do that in an inverted architecture like that, you have to build a state machine. State machines are notoriously hard for people to implement because you've got to move all of your state off of the stack into objects. And then you have this big case statement that envelopes your entire logic. It's a nightmare to figure out. But, the transformation from serially executing code into a state machine, its continuation-passing-style translation is actually one that you can do in a machine-based fashion." #3 - compilers are good at writing state machines: "You can have the compiler write the state machine if you introduce syntax that allows you to indicate where you want to yield. And that's what await is. Await is basically saying, I want to yield here, and I want to yield this promise, and then when the promise completes, I want you to come back here and continue executing. Then the compiler writes a state machine around it and it actually turns it into this big switch statement and moves all of the state that survives across the await into something that's heap allocated. So it can be brought back. And doing all of that work is something that compilers are great at. And so that was sort of the idea that we have this new style of programming where we're using promises or the equivalent of promises and the ability to yield and then we have callbacks. But trying to write your program in that style, that's also what JavaScript suffered from a lot. It's like all this callback style stuff. With Async and Await, you get the illusion that you're just writing normal sequential code and then the compiler does the painful transformation for you. That turns out to be really useful."

Why did so many languages copy async/await from C#? Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of TypeScript, C# & Turbo Pascal - on what they got right with the design: #1 - async/await was designed to solve a common problem in the event-loop model: "A lot of languages are built around cooperative multitasking in the sense that they have an event loop that sits and dispatches events. Then you handle the event and then you yield back to the event handler loop. And it all runs in a single thread cooperatively. The problem with that is if you then want to do some long running work: how do I stop in the middle of this piece of long running work and yield back to the event loop cooperatively? And then when my result is ready, I can come back and continue executing here." #2 - state machines are the solution, but hard to build: "Well, in order to do that in an inverted architecture like that, you have to build a state machine. State machines are notoriously hard for people to implement because you've got to move all of your state off of the stack into objects. And then you have this big case statement that envelopes your entire logic. It's a nightmare to figure out. But, the transformation from serially executing code into a state machine, its continuation-passing-style translation is actually one that you can do in a machine-based fashion." #3 - compilers are good at writing state machines: "You can have the compiler write the state machine if you introduce syntax that allows you to indicate where you want to yield. And that's what await is. Await is basically saying, I want to yield here, and I want to yield this promise, and then when the promise completes, I want you to come back here and continue executing. Then the compiler writes a state machine around it and it actually turns it into this big switch statement and moves all of the state that survives across the await into something that's heap allocated. So it can be brought back. And doing all of that work is something that compilers are great at. And so that was sort of the idea that we have this new style of programming where we're using promises or the equivalent of promises and the ability to yield and then we have callbacks. But trying to write your program in that style, that's also what JavaScript suffered from a lot. It's like all this callback style stuff. With Async and Await, you get the illusion that you're just writing normal sequential code and then the compiler does the painful transformation for you. That turns out to be really useful."

The Pragmatic Engineer

13,258 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Lara Logan has a dire warning for America Bill Bates Digital ID and vaccine tracking moving forever, the plan to remove Donald Trump after midterms, Los Angeles is rigging elections with Smartmatic electronic voting machines and Democrats plan to change the Constitution “This is going to shock you, but it was the Gates Foundation, what did they unveil this week? A globally interoperable digital identity infrastructure that permanently tracks every individual's vaccine status from birth. If you think because Donald Trump is in the White House that they have paused for one single moment, I am here to make it very clear to you that that is not accurate. This agenda is moving forward at high speed. Some things have been slightly derailed, but the strategy to counter that is to stall and stall and stall. You should know that none of his executive orders have been legislated. Not one. And if you think there's three more years, I wouldn't count on it, because the plan is to take the midterms and impeach him. And what he'll be impeached for will shock you. Because fabricating crimes didn't work so well last time, did it? Didn't work. This time it's going to work. You want to know why? (Explained)” “What's the one thing everybody in this room wants? How about accountability Why is it the one thing that matters? Because nothing you're doing, nothing I've ever done, is going to matter if we don't have accountability — If we don't have accountability, all of the people who did what they did during COVID are going to do it again. The Gavin Newsoms of this world are just going to keep passing more laws that take more of your freedom away — I'll tell you why it's California. Because you're the closest to a Marxist society in this country. You are the Marxist state of America. And this is the testing ground for all of these systems. Who runs the elections in Los Angeles? Smartmatic. Why is Los Angeles the only place in America where Smartmatic still runs the elections? Not because there aren't other types of fraud in other places, but because California is the testing ground for how to create these things and proliferate them at scale and then push them beyond. There are 22 states in this country that are currently under Democratic control, and at least two or three that are Republicans that vote with the Democrats. How many states does it take to change the Constitution? Two-thirds. Two-thirds majority. So if you think you're safe, you're not safe, not even close to being safe.“ If we don’t have mass arrests of Democrats, all of this is 100% coming true

Lara Logan has a dire warning for America Bill Bates Digital ID and vaccine tracking moving forever, the plan to remove Donald Trump after midterms, Los Angeles is rigging elections with Smartmatic electronic voting machines and Democrats plan to change the Constitution “This is going to shock you, but it was the Gates Foundation, what did they unveil this week? A globally interoperable digital identity infrastructure that permanently tracks every individual's vaccine status from birth. If you think because Donald Trump is in the White House that they have paused for one single moment, I am here to make it very clear to you that that is not accurate. This agenda is moving forward at high speed. Some things have been slightly derailed, but the strategy to counter that is to stall and stall and stall. You should know that none of his executive orders have been legislated. Not one. And if you think there's three more years, I wouldn't count on it, because the plan is to take the midterms and impeach him. And what he'll be impeached for will shock you. Because fabricating crimes didn't work so well last time, did it? Didn't work. This time it's going to work. You want to know why? (Explained)” “What's the one thing everybody in this room wants? How about accountability Why is it the one thing that matters? Because nothing you're doing, nothing I've ever done, is going to matter if we don't have accountability — If we don't have accountability, all of the people who did what they did during COVID are going to do it again. The Gavin Newsoms of this world are just going to keep passing more laws that take more of your freedom away — I'll tell you why it's California. Because you're the closest to a Marxist society in this country. You are the Marxist state of America. And this is the testing ground for all of these systems. Who runs the elections in Los Angeles? Smartmatic. Why is Los Angeles the only place in America where Smartmatic still runs the elections? Not because there aren't other types of fraud in other places, but because California is the testing ground for how to create these things and proliferate them at scale and then push them beyond. There are 22 states in this country that are currently under Democratic control, and at least two or three that are Republicans that vote with the Democrats. How many states does it take to change the Constitution? Two-thirds. Two-thirds majority. So if you think you're safe, you're not safe, not even close to being safe.“ If we don’t have mass arrests of Democrats, all of this is 100% coming true

Wall Street Apes

350,637 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I was watching this Bloomberg video, notice how they subtly insert the fact that this woman was born into the “lowest caste” in “India’s social hierarchy,” even if it’s irrelevant to the story. Keep in mind, this is not accidental—it’s a calculated effort to reinforce the narrative that the “caste system” defines India. The goal is to shape American perceptions, convincing their white audience that Indians are inherently bigoted and perpetuate “caste oppression.” What they deliberately ignore is that India has gigantic welfare programs exclusively designed to benefit the same “lower caste” communities, funded largely by “upper-caste” taxpayers. (Over $35 Billion/year spent for SC/ST welfare) They also avoid addressing how Tamil Nadu, despite being considered one of the most socially progressive states, has some of the highest levels of caste-based discrimination, because most of it is lower caste on lower caste violence, and there is no way to drag "upper castes" into it and start caste-baiting. At the end of the day, the suffering of these women stems from poverty & economic hardship, not caste. It deflects from deeper issues like the failures of Nehruvian socialist policies, as well as, how communist activists have annihilated manufacturing and industries, which is the real driver of poverty. Instead of acknowledging the nuances or the economic roots of poverty, they simplify the issue into a black-and-white story of Oppressors Vs Victims, attempting to dehumanize Indians as a whole. The core objective of all this is to lay groundwork for justifying their future political interference when India tries to stand up to America. They have been demonizing China for decades; now it’s India’s turn. Recognize the propaganda, call it out, and spread the word.

I was watching this Bloomberg video, notice how they subtly insert the fact that this woman was born into the “lowest caste” in “India’s social hierarchy,” even if it’s irrelevant to the story. Keep in mind, this is not accidental—it’s a calculated effort to reinforce the narrative that the “caste system” defines India. The goal is to shape American perceptions, convincing their white audience that Indians are inherently bigoted and perpetuate “caste oppression.” What they deliberately ignore is that India has gigantic welfare programs exclusively designed to benefit the same “lower caste” communities, funded largely by “upper-caste” taxpayers. (Over $35 Billion/year spent for SC/ST welfare) They also avoid addressing how Tamil Nadu, despite being considered one of the most socially progressive states, has some of the highest levels of caste-based discrimination, because most of it is lower caste on lower caste violence, and there is no way to drag "upper castes" into it and start caste-baiting. At the end of the day, the suffering of these women stems from poverty & economic hardship, not caste. It deflects from deeper issues like the failures of Nehruvian socialist policies, as well as, how communist activists have annihilated manufacturing and industries, which is the real driver of poverty. Instead of acknowledging the nuances or the economic roots of poverty, they simplify the issue into a black-and-white story of Oppressors Vs Victims, attempting to dehumanize Indians as a whole. The core objective of all this is to lay groundwork for justifying their future political interference when India tries to stand up to America. They have been demonizing China for decades; now it’s India’s turn. Recognize the propaganda, call it out, and spread the word.

@drishtadyumna

15,189 просмотров • 1 год назад