Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

How did the New York caste bill quietly die this legislative session? And why didn't HAF sound the alarm every step of the way? Because HAF was busy doing the work. Effective advocacy isn't always loud. While public campaigns have their place, reactive social media posts and mass action...

16,838 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Thomas Massie blocked a plan to give AI data centers immunity from local and state laws. Twice. And he blocked a plan to give pesticide companies immunity to mass poison Americans. “It’s cronyism.” “The first version of the Big Bill had a provision that would let data centers ignore state laws.” “And not just state laws, but local zoning laws.” “Marjorie Taylor Greene and I fought to get that taken out, and it was taken out, fortunately.” “That issue came up again recently in my Judiciary Committee.” “We were marking up eight bills one day in a work session, and I noticed that number six on the list was to exempt data centers from eight different environmental laws.” “They couldn’t be sued if they didn’t have the permits.” “Even though some of those environmental laws may be onerous, I don’t know why you would give an exemption to data centers, but not to the farmers or other industries.” “So I tweeted about it, in real time, blew the whistle, and they decided to take it off of the schedule that day.” “I have obstructed things like special privileges and immunities for data centers.” “And most recently in the Farm Bill, they had a provision that was gonna give special privileges and immunities … to Monsanto-Bayer, which makes glyphosate.” “They said, we’ll give every pesticide immunity from all state labeling laws.” “Myself and some other colleagues worked hard, we drafted amendments.” “We forced it to a vote on the floor of the House and took that special provision … removed from the Farm Bill.” “And I did vote for the Farm Bill because it has my signature piece of legislation in it, which is a bill to make it easier for farmers to use a local processor and sell their beef, pork, and lamb directly to consumers.” This is why the deep state is desperately trying to oust him from Congress right now. And it’s why he needs the people to rally behind him now more than ever. Thomas Massie Thomas Massie for Congress

Holden Culotta

100,570 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Over 200 facial recognition cameras were installed in New Orleans and have been scanning Americans faces 24/7 The police worked with a NGO to go through data and profile Americans for arrest using artificial intelligence “You know about all the facial recognition cameras in New Orleans, right? Oh, you mean you didn't notice the over 200 cameras scanning faces 24/7? Well, they're here, and many are located in the city's French Quarter. For years, over 15 million people who visit this neighborhood annually have been quietly documented while local police were automatically notified if AI software found a match to a person of interest. The problem? AI isn't always accurate, and it has more errors among people with darker skin tones, women, children, and the elderly. Because of these limitations, privacy experts agree that AI-generated facial recognition matches will lead to wrongful arrests. Which is why when the New Orleans City Council first allowed police to use facial recognition technology in 2022, they chose to protect privacy and ban any mass generalized surveillance of the public, except the police did it anyway with the help of a local nonprofit that owns and operates the cameras. It wasn't until the spring of 2025 that the AI-generated alerts were first revealed to the public and turned off. So for now, the AI-generated alerts remain paused, but the facial recognition cameras, they'll remain while New Orleans debates whether or not to be the first US city to give law enforcement the power to track residents and tourists in real time”

Wall Street Apes

64,632 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

We've been advocating for a Caste Census for some time. The Modi government had previously opposed it, citing reasons we're unclear about. Now, they've suddenly decided to move forward. We wholeheartedly welcome this decision but demand a clear implementation timeline. Telangana serves as a model state for caste census. Having successfully conducted a comprehensive caste census in Telangana, we suggest the national census incorporate some of its effective approaches. We've discussed two other key issues. Firstly, the 50% cap on reservations, which is increasingly becoming an impediment to development, progress and the advancement of backward castes, Dalits, and Adivasis. We advocate for eliminating this barrier. Having successfully pressured the government to conduct a caste census, we'll continue to push for removing the 50% cap. Additionally, we demand the implementation of Article 15(5), which pertains to reservations in private educational institutions—a law that already exists. We urge the government to implement it promptly. I think every Congress member, worker, and every single person who has fought for the caste census—and there are millions of people, activists from the backward communities, Dalits, and Adivasis—I am very proud of what you have done. This would not be possible without the effort and the hard work that you have done. It has been a sustained campaign that we have run, and I am very proud of every single person who has helped us in this campaign. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi

Congress

16,927 просмотров • 1 год назад

The same kinds of productivity gains we've seen in coding with AI agents are heading to the rest of knowledge work. This is the jump when you go from having a chatbot to being able to actually have an agent go off and do work for minutes or even hours and come back with a complete work output that you then review. Here's an example of the new Box Agent filling out an RFP response from an existing knowledge base. This process would normally take hours to fill out, and requires the full attention of the user doing the work. Now, you provide the Box Agent with the RFP questions, and it will go off, make a plan, extract all the relevant questions, read through existing source material to come up with an answer, and then generate a new word document as the final output. All while you're doing something else. The key to this architecture is that the agent is able to use all of the same tools in the background that a user uses to get work done. The agent can search for documents, read entire files, run scripts and tools in the background, and even be able to write code on the fly to automate tasks it hasn't seen before. And best of all, the Box Agent will (soon) work from the Box MCP and CLI so you can invoke it in any agentic system as a step in a process. This kind of agent complexity would have been impossible even 6 months ago. Models consistently failed at tracking long running tasks or using the right tools at the right moment for the task. But this is all now possible because of models like GPT-5.4, Opus 4.6, and Gemini 3, and is only getting better by the month. Just as we moved from engineers writing code and using AI as an assistant to answer questions, in many areas of knowledge work -like legal, finance, consulting, sales, marketing, and more- when we have a problem we'll just kick off the AI agent to just go work on it for us in the background.

Aaron Levie

24,618 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Friedberg’s Ideal Immigration Test: Worker or Welfare? (Or Makers vs Takers) “I'm all about discerning immigration, not on the lines of some cultural definition, but really around that simple framing of are you going to get social support services or are you going to work? Going back to my makers vs takers point, if the primary motivation for an individual to come to this country is to be given benefits, to be given payments, to be given social services, to be given support, I think that that person should be denied immigration. If the primary motivation for the individual to come to the United States is to work to progress themselves, to become a maker, to create things, to work in such a way that they can generate income, save capital, buy things, advance their family's position because they are denied those rights due to the tyranny of the place that they're coming from, then they should be granted immigration status to come to this country and contribute. Because at the end of the day, what people may not like to hear, which is the truth, is that every single one of those people is actually net positive in growing our economy. And everyone thinks it's a zero-sum game with respect to jobs in the United States, and we shouldn't let people into this country that create jobs. But the fundamental truth is that anyone that is productive, meaning they create more value than they take in, grows the economy and more jobs get created, and overall, we all benefit from having those individuals here in this country. And by the way, if you are going to work, you are going to culturally assimilate, because that is what the United States is based on, which is productivity, work hard, create things, and have individual agency, have the ability to progress yourself in this world, in this society. And if you take advantage of that opportunity, you're going to love the American ideals that this country was founded upon.”

The All-In Podcast

54,657 просмотров • 24 дней назад

The sanctum sanctorum of ANY place of worship is subject to rules and open only to AUTHORIZED personnel. Hindu temples all over the world welcome a wide variety of visitors and devotees. In this short video, CoHNA’s Dalit and Bahujan leaders share their own lived experiences of inclusion and acceptance in temples across the US. If New York media is interested in Dalit Bahujan voices, we encourage them to listen and find out more. Yashica Dutt and Hindus for Human Rights are literally trying to deny Hindu spaces the most basic rights of access, security, and authorization. Let that sink in. We can also see they have no knowledge of how Hindu temples work, because the inner sanctum is always reserved for those with the authority and training to enter and execute a skilled job. And yes, the job of a Hindu priest is a skilled one, requiring years of study and training. We ask any of these caste warriors trying to paint Hindu temples as “exclusionary” for not having open access to anyone at any time - just try walking into ANY office or shop and demanding access to their inner spaces without authorization! Show up at your local tax-payer funded school and ask to sit in the chair of the school Principal for even an hour or demand to handle the trophies on display. Try walking into your city council meeting without an invitation and demand to sit at the table reserved for councilors. Go to your local grocery store, Target or Walmart and complain if the cashier does not allow you to “touch” the cash register. Try entering a pulpit without authorization or asking to touch sacred relics in places of worship that are not Hindu. This narrative is in line with their previous attempts to demonize Hindus and create double standards in law and policy. These fake allegations and tropes were used to build a witch hunt in California prior to the introduction of the infamous caste bill by State Senator Aisha Wahab (SB 403). Now, there is an attempt to revive and recycle those tired tropes to create a two-tier society in New York State. City & State NY

CoHNA (Coalition of Hindus of North America)

10,220 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Why did so many languages copy async/await from C#? Anders Hejlsberg(Anders Hejlsberg) - creator of TypeScript, C# & Turbo Pascal - on what they got right with the design: #1 - async/await was designed to solve a common problem in the event-loop model: "A lot of languages are built around cooperative multitasking in the sense that they have an event loop that sits and dispatches events. Then you handle the event and then you yield back to the event handler loop. And it all runs in a single thread cooperatively. The problem with that is if you then want to do some long running work: how do I stop in the middle of this piece of long running work and yield back to the event loop cooperatively? And then when my result is ready, I can come back and continue executing here." #2 - state machines are the solution, but hard to build: "Well, in order to do that in an inverted architecture like that, you have to build a state machine. State machines are notoriously hard for people to implement because you've got to move all of your state off of the stack into objects. And then you have this big case statement that envelopes your entire logic. It's a nightmare to figure out. But, the transformation from serially executing code into a state machine, its continuation-passing-style translation is actually one that you can do in a machine-based fashion." #3 - compilers are good at writing state machines: "You can have the compiler write the state machine if you introduce syntax that allows you to indicate where you want to yield. And that's what await is. Await is basically saying, I want to yield here, and I want to yield this promise, and then when the promise completes, I want you to come back here and continue executing. Then the compiler writes a state machine around it and it actually turns it into this big switch statement and moves all of the state that survives across the await into something that's heap allocated. So it can be brought back. And doing all of that work is something that compilers are great at. And so that was sort of the idea that we have this new style of programming where we're using promises or the equivalent of promises and the ability to yield and then we have callbacks. But trying to write your program in that style, that's also what JavaScript suffered from a lot. It's like all this callback style stuff. With Async and Await, you get the illusion that you're just writing normal sequential code and then the compiler does the painful transformation for you. That turns out to be really useful."

The Pragmatic Engineer

13,258 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Lara Logan has a dire warning for America Bill Bates Digital ID and vaccine tracking moving forever, the plan to remove Donald Trump after midterms, Los Angeles is rigging elections with Smartmatic electronic voting machines and Democrats plan to change the Constitution “This is going to shock you, but it was the Gates Foundation, what did they unveil this week? A globally interoperable digital identity infrastructure that permanently tracks every individual's vaccine status from birth. If you think because Donald Trump is in the White House that they have paused for one single moment, I am here to make it very clear to you that that is not accurate. This agenda is moving forward at high speed. Some things have been slightly derailed, but the strategy to counter that is to stall and stall and stall. You should know that none of his executive orders have been legislated. Not one. And if you think there's three more years, I wouldn't count on it, because the plan is to take the midterms and impeach him. And what he'll be impeached for will shock you. Because fabricating crimes didn't work so well last time, did it? Didn't work. This time it's going to work. You want to know why? (Explained)” “What's the one thing everybody in this room wants? How about accountability Why is it the one thing that matters? Because nothing you're doing, nothing I've ever done, is going to matter if we don't have accountability — If we don't have accountability, all of the people who did what they did during COVID are going to do it again. The Gavin Newsoms of this world are just going to keep passing more laws that take more of your freedom away — I'll tell you why it's California. Because you're the closest to a Marxist society in this country. You are the Marxist state of America. And this is the testing ground for all of these systems. Who runs the elections in Los Angeles? Smartmatic. Why is Los Angeles the only place in America where Smartmatic still runs the elections? Not because there aren't other types of fraud in other places, but because California is the testing ground for how to create these things and proliferate them at scale and then push them beyond. There are 22 states in this country that are currently under Democratic control, and at least two or three that are Republicans that vote with the Democrats. How many states does it take to change the Constitution? Two-thirds. Two-thirds majority. So if you think you're safe, you're not safe, not even close to being safe.“ If we don’t have mass arrests of Democrats, all of this is 100% coming true

Wall Street Apes

350,223 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I was watching this Bloomberg video, notice how they subtly insert the fact that this woman was born into the “lowest caste” in “India’s social hierarchy,” even if it’s irrelevant to the story. Keep in mind, this is not accidental—it’s a calculated effort to reinforce the narrative that the “caste system” defines India. The goal is to shape American perceptions, convincing their white audience that Indians are inherently bigoted and perpetuate “caste oppression.” What they deliberately ignore is that India has gigantic welfare programs exclusively designed to benefit the same “lower caste” communities, funded largely by “upper-caste” taxpayers. (Over $35 Billion/year spent for SC/ST welfare) They also avoid addressing how Tamil Nadu, despite being considered one of the most socially progressive states, has some of the highest levels of caste-based discrimination, because most of it is lower caste on lower caste violence, and there is no way to drag "upper castes" into it and start caste-baiting. At the end of the day, the suffering of these women stems from poverty & economic hardship, not caste. It deflects from deeper issues like the failures of Nehruvian socialist policies, as well as, how communist activists have annihilated manufacturing and industries, which is the real driver of poverty. Instead of acknowledging the nuances or the economic roots of poverty, they simplify the issue into a black-and-white story of Oppressors Vs Victims, attempting to dehumanize Indians as a whole. The core objective of all this is to lay groundwork for justifying their future political interference when India tries to stand up to America. They have been demonizing China for decades; now it’s India’s turn. Recognize the propaganda, call it out, and spread the word.

@drishtadyumna

15,189 просмотров • 1 год назад

Mary Barra, Chairman and CEO of General Motors, on the single most underrated trait that separates high performers from everyone else: It's not intelligence, experience, or even talent. She is direct about it: "In my experience, in school and career, at work and at play, there are lots of talented people out there. But talent alone isn't enough. You need something more." That "something more" is what most people overlook entirely. "One thing that distinguishes those who really make a difference in life, those who really contribute, is passion and hard work. Remember, hard work beats talent, if talent doesn't work hard." But Mary Barra takes it further than just working hard. Because working hard quietly, passively, and waiting for your turn doesn't move the needle either. Most people operate on the edges. They show up, do the work they're assigned, and wait to be noticed. Barra says that mindset is exactly what holds people back: "Don't be content to work around the edges of your profession. Don't wait to be invited to important meetings or asked to work on crucial assignments. Instead, do what it takes to ensure that you're in the middle of your business." The underrated trait is proactive hard work, not just hard work alone. "Speak up, volunteer, show your enthusiasm, knock on doors." And the compounding effect of that behaviour is significant at every level of an organisation: "As an employee, your enthusiasm will make your job more interesting and get you noticed. As a manager, your passion will inspire others to join your team and work as hard as you to accomplish great things." The people who consistently rise are the ones who stopped waiting for permission and started showing up like the work already mattered to them, because it always did.

Big Brain Business

391,040 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Dirty Little Secret About Homelessness Is Also The Key To Ending It The US Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments about what cities can and cannot do to end homelessness. "What if there is a bed available in the Gospel Rescue Mission, but Ms. Johnson, a person, doesn't want it? Doesn’t wish to leave their pet. Her Rottweiler's not permitted there. So that is a difficult question for a person and a difficult policy question..." What everyone agreed on was that homelessness is a difficult problem. "Many people have mentioned this is a serious policy problem… So, the policy questions in this case are very difficult….Martin speaks in terms of someone who is involuntarily homeless and that raises all of those policy questions… We usually think about whether state law, local law already achieves those purposes so that the federal courts aren't micromanaging homeless policy…" I think most people listening to the Supreme Court would agree: it isn’t going to solve homelessness. That is a job for state legislators. So why haven’t they? Why has homelessness gotten worse? The answer that many homeless advocates give is that it’s because we don’t have enough homes, and poverty has increased. But neither is true. Poverty has steadily declined since the 1980s, when homelessness first became an issue of public concern. And very few people are on the street simply because they can’t afford the rent. The evidence is overwhelming that the majority of people on the street are there because of untreated mental illness or addiction, which leads people to use all their money to support their drug habit and be high, rather than work. People who can’t afford the rent but are able to work and aren’t in the grip of addiction or untreated mental illness find a cheaper place to live, move somewhere cheaper, or live with family and friends. It’s true there aren’t enough shelter beds, case workers, group homes, and psychiatric hospitals to care for the homeless. But a big part of the reason for that is that advocates for the homeless have, for 40 years, demanded that funding for dealing with the homeless go into giving people private studio apartments rather than building sufficient shelter beds. They call this “Housing First,” and its record is awful. Few stay in housing, and many die because it fails to treat the cause of the problem, addiction, and untreated mental illness rather than the symptoms. Studies find that cities that prioritize basic shelter over expensive housing reduce the deaths of homeless by 3-fold. And so in LA, homeless die at a rate 3 times higher than New York because living inside protects people from murder, drug overdose, and car accidents. Making matters worse, homeless advocates, along with the ACLU, have opposed expanding psychiatric hospitals, and mandatory care in general, because they believe it’s worse to mandate hospitalization for people who are dangerously psychotic or manic than to simply leave them on the street. But it’s not. Last year, 112,000 Americans died from drug overdose and poisoning because we failed to mandate treatment. Two of my friends from high school would still be alive today had we mandated they get treatment for addiction rather than letting them die. What is happening on homelessness is a record of failure. The number of drug deaths quintupled from 20,000 in 2022 to 112,000 last year. That’s more people dying per year than died in Hiroshima. Homelessness is not a fundamental problem of housing. It’s a problem of enabling addiction and untreated mental illness, both of which lead people to give up on work, lie, steal, cheat their families and friends, and live on the street, where they turn to petty crime to sustain their drug habits. This seems cruel to many people, which is why homelessness has gotten worse. In other words, the reason homelessness has gotten worse is because we’ve enabled it, and subsidized it, rather than funded treatment and recovery. Nobody has subsidized homelessness more than California, Washington, and Oregon. And it’s been in those states that homelessness has worsened the most. Why? The homelessness groups really believe it’s more cruel to mandate care than to let people die on the streets. But there is an ideology behind this, too. It’s the idea that people suffering from addiction and mental illness are victims of society or the system, which is fundamentally evil. And, according to their logic, to restore justice in the world, we must give victims whatever they want, including the right to camp anywhere and use hard drugs, even if it results in their death. You might call this "pathological altruism. Think of the Kathy Bates character in Misery. Or of the mother who poisons her child in order to have a sick person to take care of, like in “Sixth Sense.” It’s no coincidence that the same people who believe this also think civilization is evil and should be replaced by something more akin to primitive anarchism, like the kind romanticized by intellectuals since Rousseau. The alternative to this dystopia is tough love. We need to give people the care they need, but that’s not through enabling addiction and illegal behavior, but rather enforcing laws and mandating care, as an alternative to jail, when they are broken. It’s not enough to do what many Republicans want to do, which is to enforce laws and recriminalize shoplifting and hard drugs simply. We need to do that, for sure. But states must also have caseworkers, group homes, and psychiatric hospitals so there is an alternative to jail, and so states can provide people with the specialized care where it’s available, which simply isn’t going to be in many of the small towns, like the one at the center of the Supreme Court hearing. The dirty little secret about homelessness, which is also the key to ending it, is...

Michael Shellenberger

29,148,070 просмотров • 2 лет назад

John Ternus, Apple's SVP of Hardware Engineering, explains why Apple deliberately made the iPhone harder to repair, and why the math says it was worth it: In a conversation with MKBHD, John frames the design challenge by asking you to imagine two extremes: "Sometimes for me I find it helpful to kind of think about the book ends. Like if you imagine a product that never fails, right? That just doesn't fail. And on the other end, a product that maybe isn't very reliable but is super easy to repair." His position is clear: "Product that never fails is obviously better for the customer. It's better for the environment." When pushed on whether infinite repairability and infinite durability have to be mutually exclusive, John acknowledges they aren't always, but explains why the tension is real, using the iPhone battery as an example. Batteries wear out. If you want to extend the life of the product, they need to be replaced. But in the early days of iPhone, one of the most common failures wasn't the battery, it was water: "Where you drop it in the pool or you, you know, spill your drink on it and the unit fails. And so, we've been making strides over all those years to get better and better and better in terms of minimizing those failures." That work led Apple to an IP68 rating, the point where customers fish their phones out of lakes after two weeks and find them still working. But there was a cost to achieving that level of durability: "To get the product there, you've got to design a lot of seals, adhesives, other things to make it perform that way, which makes it a little harder to do that battery repair." That's the deliberate tradeoff. Apple chose tighter seals and stronger adhesives, knowing it would make battery replacement more difficult, because the reliability gains were worth it. John argues the math backs this decision: "It's objectively better for the customer to have that reliability and it's ultimately better for the planet because the failure rates since we got to that point have just dropped. It's plummeted, right? The number of repairs that need to happen and every time you're doing a repair, you're bringing in new materials to replace whatever broke." His conclusion reframes the entire repairability debate: "You can actually do the math and figure out there's a threshold at which if I can make it this durable, then it's better to have it a little bit harder to repair because it's going to net out."

Big Brain Business

385,397 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад