正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

How do California elections actually work? In this comprehensive California Decides video explainer, Hoover Distinguished Visiting Fellow Ben Ginsberg breaks down who runs the state's elections, how ballots are counted, why results can take weeks to finalize, and what safeguards are built into the process. The series also examines...

16,854 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

1 条评论

Rich D 的头像
Rich D1 个月前

@BenLGinsberg California elections are crooked

相关视频

This is how Democrats stay in power in California US Attorney Bill Essayli was kicked off the Elections Committee by Democrats for fighting for Voter ID 🚨 He exposed how the State’s website allows ANYONE to receive mail in ballots without a drivers license or social security. You simply check the box, ‘I don’t have one’ and are sent a ballot “The Democrats in our legislature in Sacramento kicked me off my elections committee for fighting for you, the voters, and speaking up on voter id” “I'm on the website for the State of California to register to vote on the section where you put in your driver's license, your last four of your social, there's a box underneath each one. It says, I don't have one. I don't have one. And then you're allowed to proceed to go to vote. What is the agenda here? Why do we let people register to vote and we don't verify their immigration status? We need to instill confidence in our elections” Here’s how Democrats rig elections with those mail in ballots California moved aggressively toward universal mail-in ballots. Key steps included: - 2016-2018: Laws like the Voter’s Choice Act expanded vote-by-mail options. - 2020+ Permanent universal mail-in ballots, every registered voter gets a ballot mailed automatically Ballot harvesting third parties collecting and delivering ballots was also legalized and expanded The finishing blow: In 2024 SB 1174 was signed. It locked in the statewide no-ID standard And that right there is how you permanently rig elections forever No one can ever beat this voter fraud We need a federal audit of California elections The punishment for election fraud should be equivalent to the punishment for treason, because that’s exactly what it is

Wall Street Apes

229,102 次观看 • 4 个月前

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Liz Wheeler

84,957 次观看 • 4 个月前