Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

How do we "know" that Epstein was involved with intelligence? I was always skeptical of the Epstein conspiracy theories. It was always being pushed by the stupidest people, so I assumed there was nothing there. I didn't know how right I was until Michael Tracey brought some facts to...

RichardHanania's profile picture

Richard Hanania

202,370 subscribers

30,961 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Richard Hanania
Richard Hananiavor 1 Jahr

There's a lot more in the full conversation. Michael goes through the entire story and dissects one claim after another. I'm just amazed that this has gone so far based on so little.

Profilbild von trippi ♱
trippi ♱vor 1 Jahr

so his long term girlfriend and trafficking accomplice ghislaine maxwells father being a prominent mossad asset is also just a coincidence im sure she wasn’t involved in the family business

Profilbild von awake
awakevor 1 Jahr

Dude just say that Jews pay you

Profilbild von Fred McKenzie
Fred McKenzievor 1 Jahr

Here's the source for the person who said that Acosta said that Epstein belonged to intelligence. "former senior White House official", who clearly was friendly with Jeffrey Epstein. This person was talking to Vicky Ward who was writing "Kushner Inc." where Bannon was clearly an unnamed source and is mentioned in the book 600+ times.

Profilbild von John Tale
John Talevor 1 Jahr

@grok Summarize this post as if Eminem wrote it

Profilbild von rb
rbvor 1 Jahr

Interesting. I had heard of the Alex Acosta story and put more stock in it then I should have. Thank you @mtracey

Profilbild von Lucian Atreides
Lucian Atreidesvor 1 Jahr

Rightoids have always been like this. They used to burn people at the stake using dreams as court evidence: This mindset is a fundamental aspect of American thought that manifests itself to this day, though of course dressed in new attire.

Profilbild von Johnny Elizalde
Johnny Elizaldevor 1 Jahr

Low Human Capital moment 🥀💔

Profilbild von TheNoticer
TheNoticervor 1 Jahr

So why not release all the details?

Profilbild von I'll work on a boat
I'll work on a boatvor 1 Jahr

😂😂

Ähnliche Videos

Did you know that there is ON THE RECORD documentation from the Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice that Jeffrey Epstein could not be prosecuted because he belonged to the CIA? ‌ Alexander Acosta “I was told Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone — Epstein was above his pay grade”
1:31

Did you know that there is ON THE RECORD documentation from the Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice that Jeffrey Epstein could not be prosecuted because he belonged to the CIA? ‌ Alexander Acosta “I was told Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone — Epstein was above his pay grade”

Wall Street Apes

164,479 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Alex Acosta: "I was told Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone." Dan Bongino: "Epstein worked for multiple governments, including the Israelis. Sources said that Epstein was known in the intelligence world as a hyper fixer." Dan Bongino again: "(A trusted source) told me that Epstein is an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East. The person said, I'm absolutely sure of that....the reason they wanted this story to go away is because he wasn't the only one who had the (blackmail). To sum it up, how do you know that some of these countries aren't going to some of these power players that are making some of these decisions and saying, hey, you wouldn't want these videos out there, right?" The FBI under Dan Bongino now: Claims that Epstein had no clients, was blackmailing nobody, and he assumedly he was not an intelligence agent. Do they really expect people to believe this after they told us blatantly that they knew he was an intelligence running honeypot operations? No one believes this. Not Democrat or Republican, or Independent.
1:44

Alex Acosta: "I was told Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone." Dan Bongino: "Epstein worked for multiple governments, including the Israelis. Sources said that Epstein was known in the intelligence world as a hyper fixer." Dan Bongino again: "(A trusted source) told me that Epstein is an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East. The person said, I'm absolutely sure of that....the reason they wanted this story to go away is because he wasn't the only one who had the (blackmail). To sum it up, how do you know that some of these countries aren't going to some of these power players that are making some of these decisions and saying, hey, you wouldn't want these videos out there, right?" The FBI under Dan Bongino now: Claims that Epstein had no clients, was blackmailing nobody, and he assumedly he was not an intelligence agent. Do they really expect people to believe this after they told us blatantly that they knew he was an intelligence running honeypot operations? No one believes this. Not Democrat or Republican, or Independent.

Green Lives Matter

32,181 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

On the August 16, 2024 edition of the Joe Rogan podcast, Peter Thiel said Alex Acosta "testified" to Congress when he was nominated as Trump's Labor Secretary that Jeffrey Epstein "belonged to intelligence," and that's why Acosta gave Epstein the supposedly lenient sentence in Florida. Acosta never testified to that before Congress. Thiel was just recycling the same old triple-hearsay 2019 Daily Beast quote, almost certainly originating with Steve Bannon, and then adding newly-invented details to make the quote sound even more authoritative. Somehow this ends up with Thiel claiming that Acosta made the "belonged to intelligence" statement in testimony to Congress -- which is just totally false. Completely made up. The only time Acosta actually did testify under oath on the matter, to DOJ investigators, he expressly *denied* having any knowledge that Epstein was an "intelligence asset," or that Epstein's purported ties to intelligence had any influence on the 2007-2008 plea negotiations in Florida. Thiel's entire theory of this issue, as usual, is premised on a fictitious narrative that he probably picked up from unscrupulous "researchers" on the internet. And of course Rogan just nods right along.
0:54

On the August 16, 2024 edition of the Joe Rogan podcast, Peter Thiel said Alex Acosta "testified" to Congress when he was nominated as Trump's Labor Secretary that Jeffrey Epstein "belonged to intelligence," and that's why Acosta gave Epstein the supposedly lenient sentence in Florida. Acosta never testified to that before Congress. Thiel was just recycling the same old triple-hearsay 2019 Daily Beast quote, almost certainly originating with Steve Bannon, and then adding newly-invented details to make the quote sound even more authoritative. Somehow this ends up with Thiel claiming that Acosta made the "belonged to intelligence" statement in testimony to Congress -- which is just totally false. Completely made up. The only time Acosta actually did testify under oath on the matter, to DOJ investigators, he expressly *denied* having any knowledge that Epstein was an "intelligence asset," or that Epstein's purported ties to intelligence had any influence on the 2007-2008 plea negotiations in Florida. Thiel's entire theory of this issue, as usual, is premised on a fictitious narrative that he probably picked up from unscrupulous "researchers" on the internet. And of course Rogan just nods right along.

Michael Tracey

111,126 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨Senator Ron Johnson DEMANDS to know The Truth About Alex Acosta’s Claim that Jeffrey Epstein ‘Belonged to Intelligence’, as it’s Revealed He was NOT Asked About it During His Deposition: “I don’t know why we can’t get to the bottom of this… the answer that Acosta gave. We were told he was part of intelligence. What does that mean?… How did Epstein ever become Epstein? Where did he get his money from? If he was part of U.S. Intelligence, to what purpose? What was he serving? Who was he working for?”
1:28

🚨Senator Ron Johnson DEMANDS to know The Truth About Alex Acosta’s Claim that Jeffrey Epstein ‘Belonged to Intelligence’, as it’s Revealed He was NOT Asked About it During His Deposition: “I don’t know why we can’t get to the bottom of this… the answer that Acosta gave. We were told he was part of intelligence. What does that mean?… How did Epstein ever become Epstein? Where did he get his money from? If he was part of U.S. Intelligence, to what purpose? What was he serving? Who was he working for?”

Benny Johnson

75,697 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Dave Aronberg: This was supposed to be a Democratic conspiracy, right? Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, it was a Democratic cabal on Epstein Island. Look at the names that keep appearing throughout the Epstein files. Elon Musk, Steve Bannon. How about Howard Lutnick, who said that he was so grossed out by Epstein when he went to his house that he and his wife cut ties to them. Now we find out that after that happened, he was apparently on Epstein Island.
0:42

Dave Aronberg: This was supposed to be a Democratic conspiracy, right? Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, it was a Democratic cabal on Epstein Island. Look at the names that keep appearing throughout the Epstein files. Elon Musk, Steve Bannon. How about Howard Lutnick, who said that he was so grossed out by Epstein when he went to his house that he and his wife cut ties to them. Now we find out that after that happened, he was apparently on Epstein Island.

Blue Georgia

138,677 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Everything you know about Jeffrey Epstein is a lie. Michael Tracey joins me to discuss the real Epstein: who he was, what he did, and why people get him wrong. (1:14) Michael Tracey's origin story (9:13) Why most of the Epstein books and documentaries are trash (10:45) Who was Jeffrey Epstein? (19:04) How Epstein got his money (29:00) Influencers manipulate their audiences with dishonest questions In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), we explain why picking apart the Epstein conspiracy theories doesn't constitute "defending Epstein." I then ask Michael what we know for certain that Epstein did wrong, and he takes us through the infamous 2005 Palm Beach case. We talk about how this case proves Epstein was a perverted criminal, but explain why this falls short of the Epstein conspiracy theories. We discuss Little Saint James. I ask Michael if there was a single documented instance of an underage girl visiting the island. This leads to a discussion on some of Epstein's most outspoken victims, whose claims are more than a little questionable. Toward the end, we consider the popular belief that Epstein "belonged to intelligence." Michael outlines this quote's origins and argues that it shouldn't be taken seriously. Why is that? Tune in to find out.
35:35

Everything you know about Jeffrey Epstein is a lie. Michael Tracey joins me to discuss the real Epstein: who he was, what he did, and why people get him wrong. (1:14) Michael Tracey's origin story (9:13) Why most of the Epstein books and documentaries are trash (10:45) Who was Jeffrey Epstein? (19:04) How Epstein got his money (29:00) Influencers manipulate their audiences with dishonest questions In the second half of the show (available to subscribers, link in reply), we explain why picking apart the Epstein conspiracy theories doesn't constitute "defending Epstein." I then ask Michael what we know for certain that Epstein did wrong, and he takes us through the infamous 2005 Palm Beach case. We talk about how this case proves Epstein was a perverted criminal, but explain why this falls short of the Epstein conspiracy theories. We discuss Little Saint James. I ask Michael if there was a single documented instance of an underage girl visiting the island. This leads to a discussion on some of Epstein's most outspoken victims, whose claims are more than a little questionable. Toward the end, we consider the popular belief that Epstein "belonged to intelligence." Michael outlines this quote's origins and argues that it shouldn't be taken seriously. Why is that? Tune in to find out.

Patrick Casey

144,728 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."
2:21

Joe Rogan presses JD Vance on whether people involved in Epstein's crimes had "undue influence" over the release of the files. Rogan just lays out why millions of people stopped trusting the process, and makes the Vice President respond to it directly: VANCE: "The idea that Donald Trump is being blackmailed is crazy to me because, again, I see the way that he makes decisions. I see the way that he processes this stuff. The idea that he picks up the phone with anybody and says, 'Hey, I'm gonna take orders from you.' No, that's just not how Donald Trump operates." ROGAN: "Can you understand, though, why people would come to that conclusion, especially because of the Epstein files?" VANCE: "What do you mean?" ROGAN: "Well, the Epstein files were supposed to be released, and there was a tremendous amount of resistance to those files being released. And that concerned a lot of people, because if you're talking about very wealthy, powerful people that were engaged in crimes." VANCE: "I see. You're basically saying the fear is that whatever's in the Epstein files was used to blackmail the administration into doing the Iran thing." ROGAN: "Or at the very least, the people that were involved in the Epstein files that didn't want them coming out had undue influence." VANCE: "Well, again, I say this with all candor. We absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files. We just did. But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No. Pam Bondi said, 'The client list is on my desk.' Right?" ROGAN: "Well, see, they had binders. They were standing in front—" VANCE: "But those binders were largely documents that had already been released." ROGAN: "What was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files? And she was saying there's tens of thousands of hours of film." VANCE: "I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort." "I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't think there was anything malicious going on. I think Pam was trying to respond to the political moment. I think she overstated what we had and what we didn't have. And I think that she got roasted for it publicly by a lot of people, including me." "You and I have talked about this a lot. I'm one of the OG Epstein conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone down every single rabbit hole we could go down."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

347,835 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Lydia Moynihan on the latest Epstein files drop: “I thought there was a very interesting email between Epstein and Michael Wolff. And Michael Wolff says to Epstein, if you have anything juicy about Trump to change the narrative, this was back, I believe, in the first term, now would be the time to do it because Epstein was coming under fire.” “If Epstein had something juicy, he would have loved to change the narrative and reveal it. And I would note that all of the claims that you made in the intro, were, as you mentioned, from unverified sources. They were looked into and those complainants were deemed not credible. And there were multiple incidents with those folks involving police and psychiatric evaluations.” “So look, I think if anything, this shows that Epstein didn't have anything that d*mning where he would have released it. And again, if Biden, who his DOJ did everything they could to put him in jail for four years, if they'd had any inkling or any tidbit that was damning, I think we would know that by now.”
0:50

Lydia Moynihan on the latest Epstein files drop: “I thought there was a very interesting email between Epstein and Michael Wolff. And Michael Wolff says to Epstein, if you have anything juicy about Trump to change the narrative, this was back, I believe, in the first term, now would be the time to do it because Epstein was coming under fire.” “If Epstein had something juicy, he would have loved to change the narrative and reveal it. And I would note that all of the claims that you made in the intro, were, as you mentioned, from unverified sources. They were looked into and those complainants were deemed not credible. And there were multiple incidents with those folks involving police and psychiatric evaluations.” “So look, I think if anything, this shows that Epstein didn't have anything that d*mning where he would have released it. And again, if Biden, who his DOJ did everything they could to put him in jail for four years, if they'd had any inkling or any tidbit that was damning, I think we would know that by now.”

RedWave Press

702,192 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ed Dowd: "What we're learning from the Epstein files is that it's an operating system...[and] let's not forget Epstein was involved in money laundering... [and now] Bitcoin has been tied to... Epstein, and he's been involved in taking over the network and funding it... If you wanted to set up your own dark-money blackmail operation and launder money, Bitcoin would be the perfect way to do it, I guess." This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), a former BlackRock fund manager and co-founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from an interview with Jesse Day (Jesse Day) posted to the Commodity Culture YouTube channel on February 28, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "What we're learning from the Epstein files is that it's an operating system. So we have the public-facing institutions, but we find out there's a layer of people above them that know how to manipulate that whole thing to their benefit through Kompromat and blackmail, and money laundering. "Let's not forget Epstein was involved in money laundering. That's how a lot of this stuff was. It's all dark money. And the other thing that surprised me, that I didn't. This angle I didn't think of. And again, we'll find out more, but Bitcoin has been tied to Jeffrey Epstein, and he's been involved in taking over the network and funding it. I don't know what to think of that and intuitively makes sense. "If you wanted to set up your own dark money blackmail operation and launder money, Bitcoin would be the perfect way to do it. I guess. So, you know, there's a lot that's being revealed, and I don't, you know, I don't know what that means for Bitcoin long term, but, it certainly kind of disrupts the narrative that bitcoin is freedom. "I mean, that was kind of one of the narratives that we were hearing. And I've never been a bitcoin, bear or bull. I've always said it's a. It's a proxy for NASDAQ and liquidity trade, you know. You know, buyer beware. It's not a store of wealth. It's very volatile. So that's what it's always been to me is a volatile, you know, 95% correlated asset to the NASDAQ."
1:36

Ed Dowd: "What we're learning from the Epstein files is that it's an operating system...[and] let's not forget Epstein was involved in money laundering... [and now] Bitcoin has been tied to... Epstein, and he's been involved in taking over the network and funding it... If you wanted to set up your own dark-money blackmail operation and launder money, Bitcoin would be the perfect way to do it, I guess." This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), a former BlackRock fund manager and co-founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from an interview with Jesse Day (Jesse Day) posted to the Commodity Culture YouTube channel on February 28, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "What we're learning from the Epstein files is that it's an operating system. So we have the public-facing institutions, but we find out there's a layer of people above them that know how to manipulate that whole thing to their benefit through Kompromat and blackmail, and money laundering. "Let's not forget Epstein was involved in money laundering. That's how a lot of this stuff was. It's all dark money. And the other thing that surprised me, that I didn't. This angle I didn't think of. And again, we'll find out more, but Bitcoin has been tied to Jeffrey Epstein, and he's been involved in taking over the network and funding it. I don't know what to think of that and intuitively makes sense. "If you wanted to set up your own dark money blackmail operation and launder money, Bitcoin would be the perfect way to do it. I guess. So, you know, there's a lot that's being revealed, and I don't, you know, I don't know what that means for Bitcoin long term, but, it certainly kind of disrupts the narrative that bitcoin is freedom. "I mean, that was kind of one of the narratives that we were hearing. And I've never been a bitcoin, bear or bull. I've always said it's a. It's a proxy for NASDAQ and liquidity trade, you know. You know, buyer beware. It's not a store of wealth. It's very volatile. So that's what it's always been to me is a volatile, you know, 95% correlated asset to the NASDAQ."

Sense Receptor

21,167 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Mehdi Hasan declares the Jeffrey Epstein "conspiracy theory" has been proven "real," because it's finally been proven that Epstein did in fact have "ties to the rich and powerful," as well as to "foreign governments." But... it's been known that Epstein had exactly these "ties" from the literal first moment he gained any public notoriety. Literally, since 2002. The actual Epstein "conspiracy theory" -- now in the process of being memory-holed, amazingly enough -- was of course never merely that Epstein had certain "ties" to "rich and powerful" people, or to representatives of "foreign governments." It was that he was running a vast child-sex trafficking and blackmail operation -- *in concert with* these "rich and powerful people," to whom he had "ties" -- and at the direction of, or in service to, some unknown assemblage of clandestine intelligence agencies. Uh, remember that whole thing about how he was supposedly flying around his VIP friends on the "Lolita Express," or gathering them on "Pedophile Island," so they could rape all the children he'd procured? Then he'd catch them on hidden camera, and use the resulting sexual blackmail to get them to do either his own sinister bidding, or that of his secret intel paymasters? THAT was the fundamental "theory" -- the beating heart of the "Epstein conspiracy," such as there ever was one. And it's been proven resoundingly FALSE -- based on all available evidence, after MILLIONS of new records have now been released. Yet pundits such as Mehdi, who posture as vaguely "anti-establishment," for some reason still feel the need to act like the essential "conspiracy theory" of Epstein has obviously been proven true. They can only do this if they RADICALLY define down why there was ever an "Epstein conspiracy theory" in the first place! Because... it's been proven completely false!
0:44

Mehdi Hasan declares the Jeffrey Epstein "conspiracy theory" has been proven "real," because it's finally been proven that Epstein did in fact have "ties to the rich and powerful," as well as to "foreign governments." But... it's been known that Epstein had exactly these "ties" from the literal first moment he gained any public notoriety. Literally, since 2002. The actual Epstein "conspiracy theory" -- now in the process of being memory-holed, amazingly enough -- was of course never merely that Epstein had certain "ties" to "rich and powerful" people, or to representatives of "foreign governments." It was that he was running a vast child-sex trafficking and blackmail operation -- *in concert with* these "rich and powerful people," to whom he had "ties" -- and at the direction of, or in service to, some unknown assemblage of clandestine intelligence agencies. Uh, remember that whole thing about how he was supposedly flying around his VIP friends on the "Lolita Express," or gathering them on "Pedophile Island," so they could rape all the children he'd procured? Then he'd catch them on hidden camera, and use the resulting sexual blackmail to get them to do either his own sinister bidding, or that of his secret intel paymasters? THAT was the fundamental "theory" -- the beating heart of the "Epstein conspiracy," such as there ever was one. And it's been proven resoundingly FALSE -- based on all available evidence, after MILLIONS of new records have now been released. Yet pundits such as Mehdi, who posture as vaguely "anti-establishment," for some reason still feel the need to act like the essential "conspiracy theory" of Epstein has obviously been proven true. They can only do this if they RADICALLY define down why there was ever an "Epstein conspiracy theory" in the first place! Because... it's been proven completely false!

Michael Tracey

30,856 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

BREAKING: Les Wexner's deposition has been released. Here is a segment where he talks about how odd it was that Trump was as fashion shows. Jasmine Crockett: “Did you ever spend time with Epstein and Donald Trump?” Les Wexner: “I would go to some of the Victoria’s Secret fashion shows because it was very important to the brand. At some of the fashion shows Jeffrey was there and some Trump was there. Trump would always introduce himself to me. I always thought it was kind of odd that he was at the fashion show because he had nothing to do with fashion.”
0:41

BREAKING: Les Wexner's deposition has been released. Here is a segment where he talks about how odd it was that Trump was as fashion shows. Jasmine Crockett: “Did you ever spend time with Epstein and Donald Trump?” Les Wexner: “I would go to some of the Victoria’s Secret fashion shows because it was very important to the brand. At some of the fashion shows Jeffrey was there and some Trump was there. Trump would always introduce himself to me. I always thought it was kind of odd that he was at the fashion show because he had nothing to do with fashion.”

Ed Krassenstein

1,719,898 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

JD Vance admits to Joe Rogan that the Trump administration “absolutely screwed up” its handling of the Epstein files rollout. VANCE: “I say this with all candor, we absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files.” “Like we just did.” “But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No.” “I think the reason we screwed up the comms in the Epstein files is one, you know, Pam said, Pam Bondi said the client list is on my desk.” ROGAN: “Well, she…they had binders. They were standing in front…” VANCE: “But those binders were largely documents that had already been released. Right?” ROGAN: “So what was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files and she was saying there’s tens of thousands of hours of film.” VANCE: “I don’t know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort.”
1:05

JD Vance admits to Joe Rogan that the Trump administration “absolutely screwed up” its handling of the Epstein files rollout. VANCE: “I say this with all candor, we absolutely screwed up the comms of the Epstein files.” “Like we just did.” “But do I think the reason we screwed up the comms is because we were trying to hide something? No.” “I think the reason we screwed up the comms in the Epstein files is one, you know, Pam said, Pam Bondi said the client list is on my desk.” ROGAN: “Well, she…they had binders. They were standing in front…” VANCE: “But those binders were largely documents that had already been released. Right?” ROGAN: “So what was the purpose of that performative display of the Epstein files and she was saying there’s tens of thousands of hours of film.” VANCE: “I don’t know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to make people mistrust the entire effort.”

Overton

156,153 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Alan Dershowitz firmly rejects the notion that Jeffrey Epstein had any ties to intelligence agencies. He insists there is no truth to the speculation that Epstein was working for the CIA, Mossad, or any other covert organization. Regarding Epstein’s wealth, Dershowitz claims to have no knowledge of how he made his fortune. In Dershowitz’s view, Epstein was just a curious guy from Brooklyn, New York. "I don't know who Jeffery Epstein is."
1:50

Alan Dershowitz firmly rejects the notion that Jeffrey Epstein had any ties to intelligence agencies. He insists there is no truth to the speculation that Epstein was working for the CIA, Mossad, or any other covert organization. Regarding Epstein’s wealth, Dershowitz claims to have no knowledge of how he made his fortune. In Dershowitz’s view, Epstein was just a curious guy from Brooklyn, New York. "I don't know who Jeffery Epstein is."

Shadow of Ezra

266,027 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨BREAKING: John Solomon previews his interview with President Trump, says Trump told him that he supports a deepstate special prosecutor, which will include an investiagtion into Epstein: BANNON: "You did inform him that they're thinking about appointing a special counsel on this to take over this entire, this entire investigation?" SOLOMON: "Yeah, and he said, 'I think it's a good approach. Let's just do it. Let's get, let's get the trust of the American people, let's get accountability and then let's focus on the things that matter.' BANNON: "So he's on board with the situation of getting a special prosecutor and having the Epstein situation put into that so that can be formally looked at." SOLOMON: He immediately volunteers it, and then I follow up on it, but he immediately brings up Epstein, like 'just throw that into it, let's get it all answered. I got nothing to hide. I want truth and I want prosecutions and I just want the justice system to take care of what needs to be taken care of.' It was really a remarkable moment."
0:41

🚨BREAKING: John Solomon previews his interview with President Trump, says Trump told him that he supports a deepstate special prosecutor, which will include an investiagtion into Epstein: BANNON: "You did inform him that they're thinking about appointing a special counsel on this to take over this entire, this entire investigation?" SOLOMON: "Yeah, and he said, 'I think it's a good approach. Let's just do it. Let's get, let's get the trust of the American people, let's get accountability and then let's focus on the things that matter.' BANNON: "So he's on board with the situation of getting a special prosecutor and having the Epstein situation put into that so that can be formally looked at." SOLOMON: He immediately volunteers it, and then I follow up on it, but he immediately brings up Epstein, like 'just throw that into it, let's get it all answered. I got nothing to hide. I want truth and I want prosecutions and I just want the justice system to take care of what needs to be taken care of.' It was really a remarkable moment."

Charlie Kirk

699,243 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jeffrey Epstein tells Steve Bannon to redirect his “dirty money” question to the mothers of children he helped vaccinate. BANNON: “Is your money dirty money?” EPSTEIN: “No, it’s not.” BANNON: “Why is it not dirty money?” EPSTEIN: “Because I earned it.” BANNON: “You earned it advising the worst people in the world, right? That do enormous bad things, and just to make more money.” EPSTEIN: “I think ethics is always a complicated subject. But I can tell you that with the money I gave to help try to eradicate polio in Pakistan and India… I think you might want to ask their mothers who received the vaccine, who know their child now won't get polio, and ask them if Epstein should have helped these people with their money.”
1:10

Jeffrey Epstein tells Steve Bannon to redirect his “dirty money” question to the mothers of children he helped vaccinate. BANNON: “Is your money dirty money?” EPSTEIN: “No, it’s not.” BANNON: “Why is it not dirty money?” EPSTEIN: “Because I earned it.” BANNON: “You earned it advising the worst people in the world, right? That do enormous bad things, and just to make more money.” EPSTEIN: “I think ethics is always a complicated subject. But I can tell you that with the money I gave to help try to eradicate polio in Pakistan and India… I think you might want to ask their mothers who received the vaccine, who know their child now won't get polio, and ask them if Epstein should have helped these people with their money.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,004,404 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

.John Roberts: “Why is Michael Wolff counseling Jeffrey Epstein on how to hang Donald Trump out to dry?” Mollie: “Yeah. That’s what I thought was so interesting in these emails there were many journalists who were coaching Jeffrey Epstein in how to handle things which is a weird thing to see anybody doing, much less a journalist. But back to the original point, like, that this is even a story today is something of a scandal, meaning Democrats — they went out of their way to obstruct the name of the individual in question, to make it seem like Donald Trump might have some secret here that needs to be exposed. And the reason why they obstructed the name is because Virginia Giuffre, the victim of Epstein, has had publicly and repeatedly said that Donald Trump had never witnessed or participated in any bad activity. So, this is just hard to take people seriously that they care about this. There are multiple people that have relationships with Epstein. Reid Hoffman, a Democrat super donor a very lengthy and sustained and intimate relationship with Jeffrey Epstein it would be interesting to learn more about that. Bill Clinton the former president of the United States had a relationship. We even had — Barack had a relationship. These are interesting things. But, when you make it just about Donald Trump, when we already know about it, and we already know that they had a falling out because of how Epstein was handling the situation at Mar-a-Lago, that he got kicked out, is just — I agree there is, like, stuff to know, but it’s not being handled in any way responsibly here.”
1:26

.John Roberts: “Why is Michael Wolff counseling Jeffrey Epstein on how to hang Donald Trump out to dry?” Mollie: “Yeah. That’s what I thought was so interesting in these emails there were many journalists who were coaching Jeffrey Epstein in how to handle things which is a weird thing to see anybody doing, much less a journalist. But back to the original point, like, that this is even a story today is something of a scandal, meaning Democrats — they went out of their way to obstruct the name of the individual in question, to make it seem like Donald Trump might have some secret here that needs to be exposed. And the reason why they obstructed the name is because Virginia Giuffre, the victim of Epstein, has had publicly and repeatedly said that Donald Trump had never witnessed or participated in any bad activity. So, this is just hard to take people seriously that they care about this. There are multiple people that have relationships with Epstein. Reid Hoffman, a Democrat super donor a very lengthy and sustained and intimate relationship with Jeffrey Epstein it would be interesting to learn more about that. Bill Clinton the former president of the United States had a relationship. We even had — Barack had a relationship. These are interesting things. But, when you make it just about Donald Trump, when we already know about it, and we already know that they had a falling out because of how Epstein was handling the situation at Mar-a-Lago, that he got kicked out, is just — I agree there is, like, stuff to know, but it’s not being handled in any way responsibly here.”

Curtis Houck

54,269 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Wow. Elon Musk's tweet about Trump being in the Epstein Files was posted while Joe Rogan was interviewing Kash Patel. Patel was clearly caught off guard. Rogan: Jesus Christ. Patel: I'm not participating in any of that conversation. Rogan: Jesus Christ, that’s a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein Files? Patel: I don't know how he would, but I'm just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing. That's way out of my lane...I know my lane—and that ain’t it.
1:07

Wow. Elon Musk's tweet about Trump being in the Epstein Files was posted while Joe Rogan was interviewing Kash Patel. Patel was clearly caught off guard. Rogan: Jesus Christ. Patel: I'm not participating in any of that conversation. Rogan: Jesus Christ, that’s a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein Files? Patel: I don't know how he would, but I'm just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing. That's way out of my lane...I know my lane—and that ain’t it.

MeidasTouch

5,033,669 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Shapiro Calls Out Steve Bannon on Jeffrey Epstein! "Here’s Jeffrey Epstein’s friend and quasi-fixer Steve Bannon doing the exact same thing.” ~ Ben Shapiro In today's episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, Shapiro sharply criticized the wave of conspiracy theories linking President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that one of the clearest signs someone is “in on the hoax” is when they themselves had close ties to Epstein yet now attempt to weaponize his name against political opponents. Shapiro singled out former Trump strategist Steve Bannon as a prime example. Over the summer at a Turning Point USA event, Bannon enthusiastically pushed Epstein-related theories, declaring, “Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things, not just individuals, but also institutions, intelligence institutions, foreign governments, and who’s working with him on our intelligence apparatus and in our government.” Shapiro pointed out the irony: “Here, for example, was Steve Bannon… Here’s Jeffrey Epstein’s friend and quasi-fixer Steve Bannon doing the exact same thing.” He accused Bannon and others in that circle of hypocrisy for promoting intelligence-agency conspiracies around Epstein while simultaneously trying to tie Trump to the disgraced financier. The Daily Wire host concluded that those traveling in the same circles as “a literal adviser to Jeffrey Epstein” yet complaining about Trump’s supposed Epstein connections likely “have another agenda.” Shapiro acknowledged disagreement with some of Bannon’s broader priorities but noted that Bannon at least “will say the quiet part out loud,” unlike others pushing similar narratives under the guise of concern.
1:18

Shapiro Calls Out Steve Bannon on Jeffrey Epstein! "Here’s Jeffrey Epstein’s friend and quasi-fixer Steve Bannon doing the exact same thing.” ~ Ben Shapiro In today's episode of The Ben Shapiro Show, Shapiro sharply criticized the wave of conspiracy theories linking President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that one of the clearest signs someone is “in on the hoax” is when they themselves had close ties to Epstein yet now attempt to weaponize his name against political opponents. Shapiro singled out former Trump strategist Steve Bannon as a prime example. Over the summer at a Turning Point USA event, Bannon enthusiastically pushed Epstein-related theories, declaring, “Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things, not just individuals, but also institutions, intelligence institutions, foreign governments, and who’s working with him on our intelligence apparatus and in our government.” Shapiro pointed out the irony: “Here, for example, was Steve Bannon… Here’s Jeffrey Epstein’s friend and quasi-fixer Steve Bannon doing the exact same thing.” He accused Bannon and others in that circle of hypocrisy for promoting intelligence-agency conspiracies around Epstein while simultaneously trying to tie Trump to the disgraced financier. The Daily Wire host concluded that those traveling in the same circles as “a literal adviser to Jeffrey Epstein” yet complaining about Trump’s supposed Epstein connections likely “have another agenda.” Shapiro acknowledged disagreement with some of Bannon’s broader priorities but noted that Bannon at least “will say the quiet part out loud,” unlike others pushing similar narratives under the guise of concern.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

32,077 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Jasmie Crokett says that she wasn't referring to the ACTUAL Jefrrey Epstein today in Congress when she claimed Zee Zeldin had taken money from Epstein COLLINS: "Lee Zeldin—He responded and said it was actually Jeffrey Epstein, who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the convicted sex trafficker." CROCKETT: "Listen, I never said that it was Jeffrey Epstein. Just so that people understand when you make a donation, your picture is not there." CROKETT: "So my team, what they did is they googled, and that is specifically why I said a Jeffrey Epstein." COLLINS: "Yeah, but people might see that and say, well, you're trying to make it sound like he took money from the sex offender." CROKETT: "I did not."
1:33

🚨BREAKING: Jasmie Crokett says that she wasn't referring to the ACTUAL Jefrrey Epstein today in Congress when she claimed Zee Zeldin had taken money from Epstein COLLINS: "Lee Zeldin—He responded and said it was actually Jeffrey Epstein, who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the convicted sex trafficker." CROCKETT: "Listen, I never said that it was Jeffrey Epstein. Just so that people understand when you make a donation, your picture is not there." CROKETT: "So my team, what they did is they googled, and that is specifically why I said a Jeffrey Epstein." COLLINS: "Yeah, but people might see that and say, well, you're trying to make it sound like he took money from the sex offender." CROKETT: "I did not."

The Patriot Oasis™

334,473 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

I go back and forth on this one. Sometimes I believe Epstein was a puppet for the US Intelligence machine, sometimes I feel it was a foreign nation-state. What I have zero doubt of is that he was an intelligence-gathering tool of some kind.
0:29

I go back and forth on this one. Sometimes I believe Epstein was a puppet for the US Intelligence machine, sometimes I feel it was a foreign nation-state. What I have zero doubt of is that he was an intelligence-gathering tool of some kind.

Andy Stumpf

19,699 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr