Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

How Elon thinks about the relationship between time and money: “Elon would always be at work on Sunday, and we had some chats where he laid out his philosophy,” said Kevin Brogan, an early SpaceX employee. “He would say that everything we did was a function of our burn... rate and that we were burning through a hundred thousand dollars per day. It was this very entrepreneurial, Silicon Valley way of thinking that none of the aerospace engineers in Los Angeles were dialed into. Sometimes he wouldn’t let you buy a part for two thousand dollars because he expected you to find it cheaper or invent something cheaper. Other times, he wouldn’t flinch at renting a plane for ninety thousand dollars to get something to Kwaj because it saved an entire workday, so it was worth it. — This is my favorite part and the main point: — He would place this urgency that he expected the revenue in ten years to be ten million dollars a day and that every day we were slower to achieve our goals was a day of missing out on that money.”show more

David Senra

170,250 subscribers

74,457 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

My cousins and my brother and I were exploring Coney Island, we saw the sights, hung out at the arcades and before we went back to the apartment we decided to go and get something to eat, we had some money on us but not much so we decided to see what we could get at one of the vendors. This was back in the early 90’s when most of them had dollar slices of pizza wherever we went. So we got 4 pieces of pizza, should have been $4 because that’s the price we were used to. The guy wanted to charge us $24 at $6 a slice. We argues with him because one of my cousins already took a bite being so hungry. But at the least we owed $4. We gave the other slices back and refused them but had to pay for the partially eaten one, it was embarrassing that an adult would try that on a bunch of kids. We told our uncle what happened and he went back and yelled at the vendor. He was familiar with them because he used to get slices all the time from the same guy and he never charged my uncle that price. I couldn’t imagine paying that exurban amount, like this guy who was being charged $54 for a hotdog by one of the vendors. At first he thought it was a typo and it was $5.40 but the vendor. Learned it up when he said no it was $54. Would you have paid that amount? I would have walked away, clearly he was trying to possibly scam a the man for looking like a tourist. Part of the experience when visiting a new area is the street food but it’s becoming more and more a chore avoiding places like this.

My cousins and my brother and I were exploring Coney Island, we saw the sights, hung out at the arcades and before we went back to the apartment we decided to go and get something to eat, we had some money on us but not much so we decided to see what we could get at one of the vendors. This was back in the early 90’s when most of them had dollar slices of pizza wherever we went. So we got 4 pieces of pizza, should have been $4 because that’s the price we were used to. The guy wanted to charge us $24 at $6 a slice. We argues with him because one of my cousins already took a bite being so hungry. But at the least we owed $4. We gave the other slices back and refused them but had to pay for the partially eaten one, it was embarrassing that an adult would try that on a bunch of kids. We told our uncle what happened and he went back and yelled at the vendor. He was familiar with them because he used to get slices all the time from the same guy and he never charged my uncle that price. I couldn’t imagine paying that exurban amount, like this guy who was being charged $54 for a hotdog by one of the vendors. At first he thought it was a typo and it was $5.40 but the vendor. Learned it up when he said no it was $54. Would you have paid that amount? I would have walked away, clearly he was trying to possibly scam a the man for looking like a tourist. Part of the experience when visiting a new area is the street food but it’s becoming more and more a chore avoiding places like this.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

362,822 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This man was criticized for expecting a “thank you” for a good deed. He always saw the same man walking when he drove to work. He assumed the man was walking because he did not have any other means of transportation. He used his own money and bought the man an electric scooter, the man took the scooter and just silently walked away, no thank you or anything else at all. I don’t think that was too much to ask, a thank you goes a long way, otherwise it makes people look ungrateful. Back in college, I had a classmate that I always saw walking home after class. It didn’t matter whether it was raining or snowing, or hot out. Whenever I drove past him he always looked miserable and I could tell he didn’t like to walk all the time. In class I had asked him where he lived, and I found out it was on my way home so I offered to drop him off because it was really cold out and had snowed about a foot. He agreed and we chatted on the way home, nothing serious just pleasant conversation. I dropped him off and went on my way home. For me this was a one time thing, I only offered because how bad it was snowing. After class the next day, he walked with me and when I got to my car he got in. I didn’t agree or offer him a ride that day but he assumed that since I was ok with giving him a ride the day prior that I would be ok with it this day too. I didn’t say anything about it because at this point I didn’t care really. So the next day came and went, once again he walked with me to the car but that day was different. I wouldn’t be going his way because I had to work after class. So before I got to the car I said “I’ll see you tomorrow.” He looked dumbfounded and said aren’t you taking me home? I said no, I have to get to work. He then asked me how he would get home, and I told him the same way you always have. He then gave me excuses for why I was being a jerk because I was making him walk in the cold. I didn’t argue I just told him I helped him out when I could, but I wasn’t about to go out of my way because he didn’t have a car and besides I didn’t want to be late for work. He didn’t speak to me for the rest of the semester because of it, something tells me I was better off not offering to help in the first place.

This man was criticized for expecting a “thank you” for a good deed. He always saw the same man walking when he drove to work. He assumed the man was walking because he did not have any other means of transportation. He used his own money and bought the man an electric scooter, the man took the scooter and just silently walked away, no thank you or anything else at all. I don’t think that was too much to ask, a thank you goes a long way, otherwise it makes people look ungrateful. Back in college, I had a classmate that I always saw walking home after class. It didn’t matter whether it was raining or snowing, or hot out. Whenever I drove past him he always looked miserable and I could tell he didn’t like to walk all the time. In class I had asked him where he lived, and I found out it was on my way home so I offered to drop him off because it was really cold out and had snowed about a foot. He agreed and we chatted on the way home, nothing serious just pleasant conversation. I dropped him off and went on my way home. For me this was a one time thing, I only offered because how bad it was snowing. After class the next day, he walked with me and when I got to my car he got in. I didn’t agree or offer him a ride that day but he assumed that since I was ok with giving him a ride the day prior that I would be ok with it this day too. I didn’t say anything about it because at this point I didn’t care really. So the next day came and went, once again he walked with me to the car but that day was different. I wouldn’t be going his way because I had to work after class. So before I got to the car I said “I’ll see you tomorrow.” He looked dumbfounded and said aren’t you taking me home? I said no, I have to get to work. He then asked me how he would get home, and I told him the same way you always have. He then gave me excuses for why I was being a jerk because I was making him walk in the cold. I didn’t argue I just told him I helped him out when I could, but I wasn’t about to go out of my way because he didn’t have a car and besides I didn’t want to be late for work. He didn’t speak to me for the rest of the semester because of it, something tells me I was better off not offering to help in the first place.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

36,929 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Kyle Shanahan recalls how he felt when Brock Purdy entered the game for an injured Jimmy Garoppolo against the Dolphins on December 4th 2022: “I just remember how good he was. The game that he came into, the duress that he was under, the style of defense they were playing at the time. The amount of blitzes that we had seen was probably the most we had seen in the six years I’d been here. At the time, he was our third quarterback to come in that year, so it wasn’t looking very good. But he didn’t hesitate, and right away, he was making plays. It was an awesome game; we were so pumped about it, but everyone was down a little bit after the game because we knew we had a good team and it was so unfortunate to lose Jimmy, which we knew would be for the year at the time. I’ll always remember going to bed that night and I was so upset about losing Jimmy. And I finally relaxed and started thinking, 'Holy cow, this guy played unbelievable, we might be all right'.” via: 49ers on NBCS

Kyle Shanahan recalls how he felt when Brock Purdy entered the game for an injured Jimmy Garoppolo against the Dolphins on December 4th 2022: “I just remember how good he was. The game that he came into, the duress that he was under, the style of defense they were playing at the time. The amount of blitzes that we had seen was probably the most we had seen in the six years I’d been here. At the time, he was our third quarterback to come in that year, so it wasn’t looking very good. But he didn’t hesitate, and right away, he was making plays. It was an awesome game; we were so pumped about it, but everyone was down a little bit after the game because we knew we had a good team and it was so unfortunate to lose Jimmy, which we knew would be for the year at the time. I’ll always remember going to bed that night and I was so upset about losing Jimmy. And I finally relaxed and started thinking, 'Holy cow, this guy played unbelievable, we might be all right'.” via: 49ers on NBCS

Coach Yac 🗣

141,332 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE First released on July 4, 1969. Yoko: All those Vietnam protests really changed the world. There was always that element who were really resisting it. That was the saving grace – that people were aware that they were that young generation who were really against it. And so it worked very well for the world. And the Bed-In was just part of it, a definite part of it. It was a statement on a very theatrical level and I think it was very effective. We were artists and did it our own way. We felt very good about it then, and it was such an incredibly strange thing that we were doing. At the time it was a courageous thing to do. John was making the statement in a way that he was looking at the far, far future. I saw it in his eyes. He was saying, ‘OK this is what we’re going to do together.’ And we’re going to give peace a chance. To the world.

GIVE PEACE A CHANCE First released on July 4, 1969. Yoko: All those Vietnam protests really changed the world. There was always that element who were really resisting it. That was the saving grace – that people were aware that they were that young generation who were really against it. And so it worked very well for the world. And the Bed-In was just part of it, a definite part of it. It was a statement on a very theatrical level and I think it was very effective. We were artists and did it our own way. We felt very good about it then, and it was such an incredibly strange thing that we were doing. At the time it was a courageous thing to do. John was making the statement in a way that he was looking at the far, far future. I saw it in his eyes. He was saying, ‘OK this is what we’re going to do together.’ And we’re going to give peace a chance. To the world.

Yoko Ono

118,138 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 JUST NOW: Despite constantly dealing with Iran, President Trump PERSONALLY got involved and negotiated a prisoner swap ON TOP of a 3-day ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine 47 NEVER STOPS, he keeps shocking the world! "It will include a suspension of all kinetic activity. Also a prisoner swap of a thousand prisoners." "We haven't seen a number like that for a while, a thousand prisoners from each country. And the president says that the request was made by him. It was something that he asked for." "That he had suggested a ceasefire. And that was something that he was trying to work out."

🚨 JUST NOW: Despite constantly dealing with Iran, President Trump PERSONALLY got involved and negotiated a prisoner swap ON TOP of a 3-day ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine 47 NEVER STOPS, he keeps shocking the world! "It will include a suspension of all kinetic activity. Also a prisoner swap of a thousand prisoners." "We haven't seen a number like that for a while, a thousand prisoners from each country. And the president says that the request was made by him. It was something that he asked for." "That he had suggested a ceasefire. And that was something that he was trying to work out."

Eric Daugherty

36,138 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jake Paul says his dad taught him what it takes to be a man, including 200 push-ups a day "My dad was really strict, really hard on us, always wanted us to pursue our dreams, to be working out, to be outside playing and doing things" "We worked on the weekends with him. Doing odd jobs, cleaning gutters, helping him build houses, roofing, landscaping, we were his employees" "He was in the Army. Very militant background, everything organized, OCD and keeping everything clean and all that" "He really taught me and my brother that the world isn't fair, it's going to be harsh and fucked up, and you have to be strong and prepared and ready for that" "Taught my brother and I what it takes to be a man. Instilled in us this desire to work hard and win. To push ourselves every single day" "He would make us do 200 push-ups a day, and we had to keep track of it and report to him at the end of the day that we did the 200 push-ups" "All crazy games and stuff like that he would do to keep us motivated"

Jake Paul says his dad taught him what it takes to be a man, including 200 push-ups a day "My dad was really strict, really hard on us, always wanted us to pursue our dreams, to be working out, to be outside playing and doing things" "We worked on the weekends with him. Doing odd jobs, cleaning gutters, helping him build houses, roofing, landscaping, we were his employees" "He was in the Army. Very militant background, everything organized, OCD and keeping everything clean and all that" "He really taught me and my brother that the world isn't fair, it's going to be harsh and fucked up, and you have to be strong and prepared and ready for that" "Taught my brother and I what it takes to be a man. Instilled in us this desire to work hard and win. To push ourselves every single day" "He would make us do 200 push-ups a day, and we had to keep track of it and report to him at the end of the day that we did the 200 push-ups" "All crazy games and stuff like that he would do to keep us motivated"

dank

591,518 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is: Rudy Giuliani: Why he was prosecuted. Why he was persecuted. Why he was arrested. Why he was indicted. Why he was sued. And why he was disbarred. 2020 Election — The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: To steal a couple hundred thousand votes, they do it every year. They never expected to be behind by 700,000 to 800,000 votes on election night. So they stopped counting the votes to create mail-in ballots. Rudy W. Giuliani: “You have two major gaps — you have the 672,770 votes that were not inspected by anyone, secretly put into the ballot box, and then you have this gap that I don’t understand between the mail-in ballots. You’ve sent out 1.8 million, and the number you counted: 2.5 million! That’s totally impossible to explain other than what some of the other witnesses were suggesting — that they were basically stuffing the ballot box. I believe what happened was that they never expected to be behind by 700,000 or 800,000 votes on election night. They expected to be behind by a couple hundred thousand. In Philadelphia, to steal a couple hundred thousand votes, they do it every year — that’s not going to be tough. Now you have a real big problem, so you had to create mail-in ballots. You had to stretch it out for a while…”

This is: Rudy Giuliani: Why he was prosecuted. Why he was persecuted. Why he was arrested. Why he was indicted. Why he was sued. And why he was disbarred. 2020 Election — The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: To steal a couple hundred thousand votes, they do it every year. They never expected to be behind by 700,000 to 800,000 votes on election night. So they stopped counting the votes to create mail-in ballots. Rudy W. Giuliani: “You have two major gaps — you have the 672,770 votes that were not inspected by anyone, secretly put into the ballot box, and then you have this gap that I don’t understand between the mail-in ballots. You’ve sent out 1.8 million, and the number you counted: 2.5 million! That’s totally impossible to explain other than what some of the other witnesses were suggesting — that they were basically stuffing the ballot box. I believe what happened was that they never expected to be behind by 700,000 or 800,000 votes on election night. They expected to be behind by a couple hundred thousand. In Philadelphia, to steal a couple hundred thousand votes, they do it every year — that’s not going to be tough. Now you have a real big problem, so you had to create mail-in ballots. You had to stretch it out for a while…”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

17,462 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

🗨️ Cellbit was mentioned on Develique's stream! #DEVELIQUE: We hadn't used our VAR all weekend, it was the only time we used it and it was a fair call. And Cellbit was right in the call anyways, so- And he got us second place! It was a good VAR call. Unfortunately, sometimes that's just gonna- We were in enemy territory, okay? We were Worldwide going up against All-Stars, in America... It was not our home grounds, you know? So... Yeah. That was what was great about Cellbit- That was why he was our team captain, because he was our number one hypeman, he was fighting for us in every single event hyping us up, supporting us, fighting for our team. He wanted to win and he wasn't competitive in a bad way by any means! He was just passionate and so into it. We were very lucky to have him on our team. We were very, very lucky.

🗨️ Cellbit was mentioned on Develique's stream! #DEVELIQUE: We hadn't used our VAR all weekend, it was the only time we used it and it was a fair call. And Cellbit was right in the call anyways, so- And he got us second place! It was a good VAR call. Unfortunately, sometimes that's just gonna- We were in enemy territory, okay? We were Worldwide going up against All-Stars, in America... It was not our home grounds, you know? So... Yeah. That was what was great about Cellbit- That was why he was our team captain, because he was our number one hypeman, he was fighting for us in every single event hyping us up, supporting us, fighting for our team. He wanted to win and he wasn't competitive in a bad way by any means! He was just passionate and so into it. We were very lucky to have him on our team. We were very, very lucky.

Cellbit English Updates

58,283 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Melvin: “The president repeatedly, though, did say that he would end the war in Ukraine on day one, and we are some 250 days into the administration.” Rubio: “That's not up to us to end the war. The Russians have to stop the war…What the president expressed is that it would be a priority of his. And it has been.” Melvin: “Repeatedly on the campaign trail, he said he would end it on day one. We're 246 days into the administration.” Rubio: “Which is an indication that he repeatedly said that he would make it a priority.”

Melvin: “The president repeatedly, though, did say that he would end the war in Ukraine on day one, and we are some 250 days into the administration.” Rubio: “That's not up to us to end the war. The Russians have to stop the war…What the president expressed is that it would be a priority of his. And it has been.” Melvin: “Repeatedly on the campaign trail, he said he would end it on day one. We're 246 days into the administration.” Rubio: “Which is an indication that he repeatedly said that he would make it a priority.”

The Bulwark

190,286 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Joe Rogan and Joe DeRosa discover that Honeymooners creator Jackie Gleason walked away from $7,000,000 left on his contract in 1956 because he didn’t want to “cheapen” the show. That's about $83,000,000 in today’s money, or $1,000,000 per episode. ROGAN: “There’s only one season?” DEROSA: "He did 39 episodes. And he was like, 'We did it. It's done.' Nobody does that now. They were like, 'You have to do more of these.' And he's like, 'Nope, we did it. We're good. We have nothing left to say.'" ROGAN: "Really?" DEROSA: "Yeah. And then they did reunion shows and shit. But, like, that was it. That's wild!" DEROSA: "Look at this. He had $7 million left in his contract in 1956, which is crazy money. [Gleason said], 'The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.'" ROGAN: "Wow." DEROSA: "I mean, that is baller shit back then. Like, that is not something people were doing back then." ROGAN: "Or he just got lazy because he had so much money." JAMIE: "CBS was gonna give him a three-year contract for what would have been $132 million today. He was going to get close to like a million dollars an episode." ROGAN: "A million an episode back then?" JAMIE: "No, no, no. [In today's dollars]." DEROSA: "When Seinfeld... announced they were all going to get a million an episode, I remember that was like groundbreaking... This guy was offered the equivalent of that back in '56 and said, 'Nah, I'm good.'" In December 1954, Gleason signed a three-year, $11,000,000 deal with Buick and CBS, the largest contract in television history at the time. The deal called for two seasons with an option for a third, but he stopped after one, leaving roughly $7,000,000 on the table. Gleason said: “The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.”

Joe Rogan and Joe DeRosa discover that Honeymooners creator Jackie Gleason walked away from $7,000,000 left on his contract in 1956 because he didn’t want to “cheapen” the show. That's about $83,000,000 in today’s money, or $1,000,000 per episode. ROGAN: “There’s only one season?” DEROSA: "He did 39 episodes. And he was like, 'We did it. It's done.' Nobody does that now. They were like, 'You have to do more of these.' And he's like, 'Nope, we did it. We're good. We have nothing left to say.'" ROGAN: "Really?" DEROSA: "Yeah. And then they did reunion shows and shit. But, like, that was it. That's wild!" DEROSA: "Look at this. He had $7 million left in his contract in 1956, which is crazy money. [Gleason said], 'The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.'" ROGAN: "Wow." DEROSA: "I mean, that is baller shit back then. Like, that is not something people were doing back then." ROGAN: "Or he just got lazy because he had so much money." JAMIE: "CBS was gonna give him a three-year contract for what would have been $132 million today. He was going to get close to like a million dollars an episode." ROGAN: "A million an episode back then?" JAMIE: "No, no, no. [In today's dollars]." DEROSA: "When Seinfeld... announced they were all going to get a million an episode, I remember that was like groundbreaking... This guy was offered the equivalent of that back in '56 and said, 'Nah, I'm good.'" In December 1954, Gleason signed a three-year, $11,000,000 deal with Buick and CBS, the largest contract in television history at the time. The deal called for two seasons with an option for a third, but he stopped after one, leaving roughly $7,000,000 on the table. Gleason said: “The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

130,442 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Julius Erving talking about playing with Charles Barkley: “I kept seeing his upside. He was hard-headed. He had something to say about everything. If he didn’t play as good as he can and well as he was capable of playing or whatever, then some of the things he did wouldn’t be tolerated. But they were tolerated because, you know, he was exceptional, man. He could rebound it, take it coast to coast, make play. And for his height to rebound the way that he did, it was incredible. It was kind of disruptive because we had won the championship the year before he got there. Then the year that he got there. We had to make room for him and he almost killed Marc Iavaroni cuz he was playing the four, Charles was like that’s my spot right there. This going back to violence in the game because the next man up. Me and you man. He get Iavaroni at his back. He back him all the way out to the top of the key” (Via All the Smoke)

Julius Erving talking about playing with Charles Barkley: “I kept seeing his upside. He was hard-headed. He had something to say about everything. If he didn’t play as good as he can and well as he was capable of playing or whatever, then some of the things he did wouldn’t be tolerated. But they were tolerated because, you know, he was exceptional, man. He could rebound it, take it coast to coast, make play. And for his height to rebound the way that he did, it was incredible. It was kind of disruptive because we had won the championship the year before he got there. Then the year that he got there. We had to make room for him and he almost killed Marc Iavaroni cuz he was playing the four, Charles was like that’s my spot right there. This going back to violence in the game because the next man up. Me and you man. He get Iavaroni at his back. He back him all the way out to the top of the key” (Via All the Smoke)

NBA Courtside

38,407 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Quentin Tarantino recounts a dinner with Robert De Niro during the making of Jackie Brown, where he asked him whether he understood when he landed the role of Vito in The Godfather Part II, that it would change his life. De Niro’s answer revealed a great deal about his mindset at the time. “I was working with Robert De Niro on Jackie brown, and we went out to dinner once. - When he got Vito in the Godfather Part II, that was going to be a big thing for him. He won the Oscar for it - it set him up to be a movie star. So I asked him - and I've asked this to quite a few actors when it comes to when they got the role that would end up changing their career - did he realize that the moment when he got the role, that it would have this sort of effect? And he goes oh, “I tried not to let it do that. I tried not to think about that” I go, "really? and why did you try not to think about that?" “Well because I’ve seen it happen and then go the other way” And then he used an example. “There was this guy, he was a young actor, and he was part of our crowd in New York. He'd been doing okay, but we were all in the same boat. Then all of a sudden he got a lead role. He's one of the two leads in a brand new movie by a director who had just done a smash hit.” And he's talking about Larry Pierce (the director) and uh... Goodbye Columbus. ”And he started dining out on it. And all of a sudden I go to the places that we used to go to, and now he's there and everyone's kind of revolving around him. He's kind of holding court. He's not doing anything bad; he's just arisen in the way that none of us have - and we're all treating him different. Then the movie comes out; nobody likes it - The movie comes out, and it goes away, and he's exactly in the same place he was. And I just wanted to make sure that that would never happen to me because I watched it happen to him.” Quote from Video Archives Podcast, sourced from James Whale Bake Sale YouTube channel. Clip below from the Godfather Part II (1974)

Gangster Cinema Central

97,458 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This guy just rips into this officer. 😳 Anyone that ever had a bad day only to be iced off by getting pulled over? That seems to be where this guy is right here. He says just about everything that someone wants to say on a day like that, but usually we do not. He also brings up an interesting debate.. The law says he must present his ID and technically he is presenting it. Does that mean he needed to hand it to the officer or was he legal in what he did?

This guy just rips into this officer. 😳 Anyone that ever had a bad day only to be iced off by getting pulled over? That seems to be where this guy is right here. He says just about everything that someone wants to say on a day like that, but usually we do not. He also brings up an interesting debate.. The law says he must present his ID and technically he is presenting it. Does that mean he needed to hand it to the officer or was he legal in what he did?

Giggling Ganon

180,240 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Asked why he made the decision to take out Nicolás Maduro, President Trump laid it out plainly. “It just was the right time to do it. We had to do it because it’s a war. We’re losing 300,000 people a year.” Trump then revealed new details from the raid. He said Maduro was holed up in what was essentially a fortress. “He was in a house that was more like a fortress than a house. It had steel doors, it had what they call a safety space where it’s, you know, solid steel all around.” Maduro tried to reach that reinforced area as the operation unfolded. “He didn’t get that space closed. He was trying to get into it, but he got bum rushed so fast that he didn’t get into that.” The U.S. military was prepared for anything. “We were prepared. We had, you know, massive blow torches and everything else that you need to get through that steel, but we didn’t need it.” “He didn’t make it to that area of the house.”

Asked why he made the decision to take out Nicolás Maduro, President Trump laid it out plainly. “It just was the right time to do it. We had to do it because it’s a war. We’re losing 300,000 people a year.” Trump then revealed new details from the raid. He said Maduro was holed up in what was essentially a fortress. “He was in a house that was more like a fortress than a house. It had steel doors, it had what they call a safety space where it’s, you know, solid steel all around.” Maduro tried to reach that reinforced area as the operation unfolded. “He didn’t get that space closed. He was trying to get into it, but he got bum rushed so fast that he didn’t get into that.” The U.S. military was prepared for anything. “We were prepared. We had, you know, massive blow torches and everything else that you need to get through that steel, but we didn’t need it.” “He didn’t make it to that area of the house.”

Overton

553,634 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Stephen A. Smith says his family was poor and had no money because his father gave it all to his other family Stephen :"he cheated on my mother but it wasn't like he was all over the place with it. He had one other family" Host :"When you say he had another family?" Stephen :"He had another family. Another house. Other kids...He was taking care of them while he was not taking care of us" "We were not poor because we didn't have money. We were poor because my father took the money and gave it to somebody else" "I watched my mother for 20 years work 16 hours a day, seven days a week with one week's vacation because she had to keep the lights on and a roof over our head and food on the table because he didn't help her do it"

Stephen A. Smith says his family was poor and had no money because his father gave it all to his other family Stephen :"he cheated on my mother but it wasn't like he was all over the place with it. He had one other family" Host :"When you say he had another family?" Stephen :"He had another family. Another house. Other kids...He was taking care of them while he was not taking care of us" "We were not poor because we didn't have money. We were poor because my father took the money and gave it to somebody else" "I watched my mother for 20 years work 16 hours a day, seven days a week with one week's vacation because she had to keep the lights on and a roof over our head and food on the table because he didn't help her do it"

CreativeDude

4,483,584 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Claim: Lazar Can't Show Us Why He Attended MIT Because He Doesn't Want to Risk Prison "[Lazar] had said he was at MIT, and that he was at Caltech." ~Dolan (No, Lazar said he had DEGREES from both. Surprised Dolan (Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure) downplayed that.) Luigi Venditelli (LV): "As far as things that I can say, [Lazar] shared with me, shared it also with my team, and also shared it with Joe Rogan in the past, in regards to his education...because that's something that I think a lot of people really attack Bob Lazar on, and rightfully so. Because if he doesn't have a paper to bring out, they can attack him. It's an easy, it's a low-hanging fruit attack for somebody who doesn't believe the story. "In regards to the MIT component, the only thing I can say is that there were national security issues there, okay?" (No, what you can say is that Lazar CLAIMED there were national security issues there. Unless you have proof that you're not sharing?) Dolan: "For people who don't know this, we'll just explain: Bob had said he was at MIT, and that he was at Caltech and no one was able to find or get any kind of confirmation that he was at those schools." (Lazar didn't just claim that he was AT those schools. He claimed he had degrees from both. This is from the 1993 Lazar Q&A at Rachel, Nevada near Area 51. Lazar: "As far as electronic technology, my degree there is from Caltech and physics is from MIT. [MIT] was a master's degree.") ~ LV: "Correct. Now, what's also important to note, specifically about MIT, is the one I wanna highlight, is that he said, 'I wasn't alone in this.' So, the government itself - he was at Los Alamos National Labs when this happened - he was sent to MIT." (Again, if LV wants to come across as unbiased and trying to get to the truth, he should be saying, "Lazar CLAIMS he was at Los Alamos and was then sent to MIT.") LV: "Now, the reason why this is important is because, and he also said, 'Not everything the government does or was doing was legal.' Okay? So there were things that were actually not necessarily legal, and they needed some scientists to go and learn certain things at MIT, and that's the reason why he was there. And there were other people there. "He said to me, 'Look, for me to bring this out, I would be revealing things that would, potentially, put other people in a compromising situation.' This had nothing...signed papers, something to do with national security. And he says, 'There's no reason for me to ruin other people's lives just to satisfy a small percentage of people who are constantly bickering about my education.'" (I don't think it's a small percentage. OK, so Bob, supposedly, says/claims he doesn't want to talk about the government allegedly sending him to MIT because he doesn't want to put other people in a compromising situation.) LV: "So, I understand that part. It's frustrating that it cannot be mentioned, but it it's also something that I understood, and it made perfect sense to me." (So Lazar can't mention any of it but LV can?) LV: "Now, I know it's frustrating to all of those who say we should still have something. Well, unfortunately, he's not gonna want to go to jail just to satisfy you." (So first it was: He doesn't want to "bring this out" because it would put people in a compromising situation and now it's: He doesn't want to risk prison. Which is it? How about we get that directly from Lazar instead of second hand?) LV: "And he would not be the only person ever to have been implicated in national security programs that were sending scientists to MIT. So that's a very important thing to also look into for history."

Claim: Lazar Can't Show Us Why He Attended MIT Because He Doesn't Want to Risk Prison "[Lazar] had said he was at MIT, and that he was at Caltech." ~Dolan (No, Lazar said he had DEGREES from both. Surprised Dolan (Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure) downplayed that.) Luigi Venditelli (LV): "As far as things that I can say, [Lazar] shared with me, shared it also with my team, and also shared it with Joe Rogan in the past, in regards to his education...because that's something that I think a lot of people really attack Bob Lazar on, and rightfully so. Because if he doesn't have a paper to bring out, they can attack him. It's an easy, it's a low-hanging fruit attack for somebody who doesn't believe the story. "In regards to the MIT component, the only thing I can say is that there were national security issues there, okay?" (No, what you can say is that Lazar CLAIMED there were national security issues there. Unless you have proof that you're not sharing?) Dolan: "For people who don't know this, we'll just explain: Bob had said he was at MIT, and that he was at Caltech and no one was able to find or get any kind of confirmation that he was at those schools." (Lazar didn't just claim that he was AT those schools. He claimed he had degrees from both. This is from the 1993 Lazar Q&A at Rachel, Nevada near Area 51. Lazar: "As far as electronic technology, my degree there is from Caltech and physics is from MIT. [MIT] was a master's degree.") ~ LV: "Correct. Now, what's also important to note, specifically about MIT, is the one I wanna highlight, is that he said, 'I wasn't alone in this.' So, the government itself - he was at Los Alamos National Labs when this happened - he was sent to MIT." (Again, if LV wants to come across as unbiased and trying to get to the truth, he should be saying, "Lazar CLAIMS he was at Los Alamos and was then sent to MIT.") LV: "Now, the reason why this is important is because, and he also said, 'Not everything the government does or was doing was legal.' Okay? So there were things that were actually not necessarily legal, and they needed some scientists to go and learn certain things at MIT, and that's the reason why he was there. And there were other people there. "He said to me, 'Look, for me to bring this out, I would be revealing things that would, potentially, put other people in a compromising situation.' This had nothing...signed papers, something to do with national security. And he says, 'There's no reason for me to ruin other people's lives just to satisfy a small percentage of people who are constantly bickering about my education.'" (I don't think it's a small percentage. OK, so Bob, supposedly, says/claims he doesn't want to talk about the government allegedly sending him to MIT because he doesn't want to put other people in a compromising situation.) LV: "So, I understand that part. It's frustrating that it cannot be mentioned, but it it's also something that I understood, and it made perfect sense to me." (So Lazar can't mention any of it but LV can?) LV: "Now, I know it's frustrating to all of those who say we should still have something. Well, unfortunately, he's not gonna want to go to jail just to satisfy you." (So first it was: He doesn't want to "bring this out" because it would put people in a compromising situation and now it's: He doesn't want to risk prison. Which is it? How about we get that directly from Lazar instead of second hand?) LV: "And he would not be the only person ever to have been implicated in national security programs that were sending scientists to MIT. So that's a very important thing to also look into for history."

Joe Murgia

32,323 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Selena Gomez reveals how Benny Blanco proposed to her. “I thought we had a shoot that day, so I had hair and makeup done, and I was just going about my regular day. I got into the car, and I was thinking to myself, ‘Where are we going?’ Because at that point, I felt like I knew all the studios I usually go to” “It was just me and my security guard, and he was laughing because he was just like, ‘I don’t know. It’s a new space’” “We got out. I walked in, and all of a sudden, I saw no one in the room. I looked at my assistant, and she just shut the door. And I was like, ‘Uhhh…’” “I think you envision all the things you would do and say when someone proposes to you. But it is actually the craziest feeling. It was really special” “He said the sweetest things, but I was so shocked that it just felt unreal for a long time. I’ve always dreamed of that moment, and he couldn’t have made it more perfect. It was one of the best days of my life, for sure”

Selena Gomez reveals how Benny Blanco proposed to her. “I thought we had a shoot that day, so I had hair and makeup done, and I was just going about my regular day. I got into the car, and I was thinking to myself, ‘Where are we going?’ Because at that point, I felt like I knew all the studios I usually go to” “It was just me and my security guard, and he was laughing because he was just like, ‘I don’t know. It’s a new space’” “We got out. I walked in, and all of a sudden, I saw no one in the room. I looked at my assistant, and she just shut the door. And I was like, ‘Uhhh…’” “I think you envision all the things you would do and say when someone proposes to you. But it is actually the craziest feeling. It was really special” “He said the sweetest things, but I was so shocked that it just felt unreal for a long time. I’ve always dreamed of that moment, and he couldn’t have made it more perfect. It was one of the best days of my life, for sure”

Buggy

289,329 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen