正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

How is a terrorist massacre anniversary celebration not inciting violence? How are student organizations permitted on Campus that could co-sponsor anniversary rallies like this? Stanford University Stanford UniversityReview Jon Hartley Condoleezza Rice Ben B@dejo Keith Rabois Dan Senor

Vered Sharon

2,525 subscribers

87,036 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Shameless ecosystem defending Al Falah University says ‘don’t paint all like this’. Nobody is. This for a University that claims not to know about a campus terrorist cell that planned 32 car bombs across Delhi on the Babri Masjid demolition anniversary.

Shameless ecosystem defending Al Falah University says ‘don’t paint all like this’. Nobody is. This for a University that claims not to know about a campus terrorist cell that planned 32 car bombs across Delhi on the Babri Masjid demolition anniversary.

Shiv Aroor

127,044 次观看 • 8 个月前

🔥🚨LISTEN to Columbia Business School professor, Shai Davidai speaking out against his university and Ivy League colleges’ leadership for not taking a stand against pro-terror student organizations and pleads to all parents to call schools and leaders and ask them if their children’s schools are being protected from pro-terror organizations. “I want this message to get to every parent in America who sent their kids to NYU, Harvard, Stanford, Berkeley. I want you to know one thing WE CANNOT PROTECT YOUR CHILD... from pro-terror students organizations because the president of Columbia University, Harvard, Stanford, Berkeley won’t speak out against pro-terror student organizations… We would never allow the KKK march on our campus, we would never allow pro-ISIS demonstration on our campus. Can you imagine in the city that had to endure 9/11, the worst attack on American soil we have pro-terror student organization… People have asked me if you’re not afraid to speak out I’m not afraid to speak up, you’re putting your job on the line. You got it all wrong. I’m not afraid to speak up, I’m speaking up because I’m afraid.”

🔥🚨LISTEN to Columbia Business School professor, Shai Davidai speaking out against his university and Ivy League colleges’ leadership for not taking a stand against pro-terror student organizations and pleads to all parents to call schools and leaders and ask them if their children’s schools are being protected from pro-terror organizations. “I want this message to get to every parent in America who sent their kids to NYU, Harvard, Stanford, Berkeley. I want you to know one thing WE CANNOT PROTECT YOUR CHILD... from pro-terror students organizations because the president of Columbia University, Harvard, Stanford, Berkeley won’t speak out against pro-terror student organizations… We would never allow the KKK march on our campus, we would never allow pro-ISIS demonstration on our campus. Can you imagine in the city that had to endure 9/11, the worst attack on American soil we have pro-terror student organization… People have asked me if you’re not afraid to speak out I’m not afraid to speak up, you’re putting your job on the line. You got it all wrong. I’m not afraid to speak up, I’m speaking up because I’m afraid.”

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

68,734 次观看 • 2 年前

Columbian University Professor denounces Columbia University in Powerful Speech: Columbia Business School assistant professor Shai Davidai denounced the President of Columbia University and other American schools for allowing pro-terrorist student organizations. He states: “They were celebrating the rape of teenage girls at a music festival in the name of resistance. They were celebrating this and the president of the university is allowing these pro-terror student organizations to march on our campuses. It doesn’t matter if you’re Christian or Jewish or Hindu or Buddhist or atheist like myself, rape is never okay, not as an act of resistance, not as an act of revenge. Rape is never okay. I’ll name it now, president Minouche Shafik of Columbia University, you are a coward because if President Biden can come up and say, ‘No, this is unacceptable, this is inhumane,’ if Eric Adams, the mayor of New York City is able to say, ‘This is not okay,’ then where are you, president Shafik of Columbia University? We are waiting for you to eradicate all pro-terror student organizations from campus.” Where does a school draw the line between free speech and hate speech or dangerous speech?

Columbian University Professor denounces Columbia University in Powerful Speech: Columbia Business School assistant professor Shai Davidai denounced the President of Columbia University and other American schools for allowing pro-terrorist student organizations. He states: “They were celebrating the rape of teenage girls at a music festival in the name of resistance. They were celebrating this and the president of the university is allowing these pro-terror student organizations to march on our campuses. It doesn’t matter if you’re Christian or Jewish or Hindu or Buddhist or atheist like myself, rape is never okay, not as an act of resistance, not as an act of revenge. Rape is never okay. I’ll name it now, president Minouche Shafik of Columbia University, you are a coward because if President Biden can come up and say, ‘No, this is unacceptable, this is inhumane,’ if Eric Adams, the mayor of New York City is able to say, ‘This is not okay,’ then where are you, president Shafik of Columbia University? We are waiting for you to eradicate all pro-terror student organizations from campus.” Where does a school draw the line between free speech and hate speech or dangerous speech?

Brian Krassenstein

1,455,416 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨🇺🇸 EXCLUSIVE | PBD: ELON COULD SET THE STANDARD ON SPEECH & CONSEQUENCES Patrick Bet-David says Elon Musk isn’t just another platform owner - he’s the trendsetter big tech copies. He argues that if Elon enforces clear penalties for inciting violence - like strikes or suspensions - others will follow, shaping a healthier online space. “I do think Elon can help influence this as well in his own way, because whatever Elon does, the other guys are going to follow him. So if Elon comes out and says, this is what we’re going to be doing, if you’re inciting violence, it’s a 30-day suspension. What if we create a FICA score… that shows how reasonable this person’s post is? Not positive, not negative, how reasonable based on facts."

🚨🇺🇸 EXCLUSIVE | PBD: ELON COULD SET THE STANDARD ON SPEECH & CONSEQUENCES Patrick Bet-David says Elon Musk isn’t just another platform owner - he’s the trendsetter big tech copies. He argues that if Elon enforces clear penalties for inciting violence - like strikes or suspensions - others will follow, shaping a healthier online space. “I do think Elon can help influence this as well in his own way, because whatever Elon does, the other guys are going to follow him. So if Elon comes out and says, this is what we’re going to be doing, if you’re inciting violence, it’s a 30-day suspension. What if we create a FICA score… that shows how reasonable this person’s post is? Not positive, not negative, how reasonable based on facts."

Mario Nawfal

280,061 次观看 • 10 个月前

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who is in charge of the Hoover Institution at Stanford, says "this is a moment of education" for young people about the challenges in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. "I live on a college campus," Sec. Rice explained during a conversation today with CBS News' Norah O'Donnell 🇺🇸 and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, "And I would say to young people: Yes, I understand the passion, but also try to understand how hard this is. You know, one of my colleagues asked some of the young people who were yelling, 'From the river to the sea,' 'from what river to what sea?' And they did not know. So, this is a moment of education also of why this has been hard."

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who is in charge of the Hoover Institution at Stanford, says "this is a moment of education" for young people about the challenges in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. "I live on a college campus," Sec. Rice explained during a conversation today with CBS News' Norah O'Donnell 🇺🇸 and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, "And I would say to young people: Yes, I understand the passion, but also try to understand how hard this is. You know, one of my colleagues asked some of the young people who were yelling, 'From the river to the sea,' 'from what river to what sea?' And they did not know. So, this is a moment of education also of why this has been hard."

CBS News

141,774 次观看 • 9 个月前

The FP’s Maya Sulkin responds to ICE’s arrest of Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and graduate student who allegedly helped lead Columbia University protests against Israel. “This is someone who has been the engine behind so much of the violence that we have seen on campus since October 7th, and so no one is telling Khalil and students like him that they cannot peacefully protest or even say things that we disagree with. What is happening is violence. It is harassment. It is trespassing. It is causing thousands of dollars in property damage and sending public safety officers to the hospital. So we are not talking about free speech anymore.…He was handing out fliers from the Hamas media outlet, which is not an exaggeration. Literally, the Hamas logo on these fliers. These are people that call October 7th a glorious day. They are carrying Hamas flags. If that is not espousing terrorist activity, I really do not know what is.”

The Free Press

678,169 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥 Georgetown President Refuses to Explain What “Decolonization Is Not a Theory” Means Congressman Randy Fine asked a basic question: “What does decolonization is not just a theory mean to you—and to Georgetown?” Georgetown President Robert Groves, head of one of America’s top universities, had no answer. “I don’t have knowledge of that exhibition… This was a student-led event, Congressman.” But the phrase isn’t obscure. In academic circles, “decolonization is not a theory” is a well-known call to revolutionary violence—used to justify armed struggle, terror, and the dismantling of Western institutions. If a university president can’t—or won’t—acknowledge that reality, students have every reason to feel unsafe. In their final moments, the university presidents floundered when asked a direct question: How can you assure a Jewish student—like Rep. Fine’s own son—that your campus is safe? Fine closed with a brutal indictment: “The Jewish students on your campus do not feel safe today, and you all should be ashamed of that.”

🔥 Georgetown President Refuses to Explain What “Decolonization Is Not a Theory” Means Congressman Randy Fine asked a basic question: “What does decolonization is not just a theory mean to you—and to Georgetown?” Georgetown President Robert Groves, head of one of America’s top universities, had no answer. “I don’t have knowledge of that exhibition… This was a student-led event, Congressman.” But the phrase isn’t obscure. In academic circles, “decolonization is not a theory” is a well-known call to revolutionary violence—used to justify armed struggle, terror, and the dismantling of Western institutions. If a university president can’t—or won’t—acknowledge that reality, students have every reason to feel unsafe. In their final moments, the university presidents floundered when asked a direct question: How can you assure a Jewish student—like Rep. Fine’s own son—that your campus is safe? Fine closed with a brutal indictment: “The Jewish students on your campus do not feel safe today, and you all should be ashamed of that.”

Stu Smith

13,397 次观看 • 1 年前

Announcing our 2026 Fellows! One is a neuroscientist exploring how the brain computes at a molecular level, another is a bioengineer 3D-printing human tissue. There’s a PhD student working on computational protein design, and an engineer developing robots to build large structures in space – just to name a few of the badasses in our new Fellowship cohort! With this one-year program, we want to support early-career talents advancing important science and tech. We connect them with senior scientists, invite them to our technical workshops, seminars, and Vision Weekends alongside leaders in their fields, and offer platforms for sharing their work. We are incredibly excited to introduce our 2026 Fellows! Longevity Biotechnology • Alex Plesa, Scientist, Harvard University Alex Plesa • Donnacha Fitzgerald, Founder, Origenity Donnacha Fitzgerald • Gianluca Cidonio, Assistant Professor, Sapienza University Gianluca Cidonio • Jakub Lála, PhD Student, Imperial College London Jakub Lála 👨🏻‍🍳🥯 • Léo Lopez, Staff Scientist, Tufts University • Nick Schaum, Postdoc & Co-Founder, University of Cambridge & Neurotechnology • Avery Krieger, Founder & CEO, Constellation Systems Avery Krieger • Constanze Albrecht, Graduate Student, MIT Media Lab • Elisa Kallioniemi, Assistant Professor, New Jersey Institute of Technology • Max Kanwal, PhD Student, Stanford University • Sven Truckenbrodt, Group Leader, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Secure AI • Huixin Zhan, Assistant Professor, New Mexico Tech • Keith Patarroyo, Research Fellow, University of Glasgow Keith Patarroyo • Mateo Petel, Research Scientist, Stanford University • Tianyi Alex Qiu, Research Fellow, Oxford Human-Centered AI Lab Tianyi Alex Qiu • Vivek Nair, CEO, Multifactor Nanotechnology • Alberto Privitera, Assistant Professor, University of Florence • Kathryn Shelley, Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Washington • Konlin Shen, Research and Development Engineer, University of California San Francisco • Qiancheng Xiong, Senior Scientist, A*STAR Bioprocessing Technology Institute Space • Philip Linden, Space Systems Engineer, Planet Labs PBC • Sidh Sikka, Co-Founder, Manifold Research Sidh Sikka Existential Hope • Abigail Olvera, Research Director, Golden Gate Institute for AI Abi Olvera • Fin Moorhouse, Researcher, Forethought Fin Moorhouse • Mahlaqua Mila Noor, Viral Immunologist, University of Cambridge • Ninon Lizé Masclef, Research Affiliate, MIT Media Lab Ninon Lizé Masclef • Peggy Yin, PhD Student, Stanford University • Ruairidh Battleday, AI Researchers & Founder, Thinking About Thinking Ruairidh Battleday Learn more about our Fellowship:

Announcing our 2026 Fellows! One is a neuroscientist exploring how the brain computes at a molecular level, another is a bioengineer 3D-printing human tissue. There’s a PhD student working on computational protein design, and an engineer developing robots to build large structures in space – just to name a few of the badasses in our new Fellowship cohort! With this one-year program, we want to support early-career talents advancing important science and tech. We connect them with senior scientists, invite them to our technical workshops, seminars, and Vision Weekends alongside leaders in their fields, and offer platforms for sharing their work. We are incredibly excited to introduce our 2026 Fellows! Longevity Biotechnology • Alex Plesa, Scientist, Harvard University Alex Plesa • Donnacha Fitzgerald, Founder, Origenity Donnacha Fitzgerald • Gianluca Cidonio, Assistant Professor, Sapienza University Gianluca Cidonio • Jakub Lála, PhD Student, Imperial College London Jakub Lála 👨🏻‍🍳🥯 • Léo Lopez, Staff Scientist, Tufts University • Nick Schaum, Postdoc & Co-Founder, University of Cambridge & Neurotechnology • Avery Krieger, Founder & CEO, Constellation Systems Avery Krieger • Constanze Albrecht, Graduate Student, MIT Media Lab • Elisa Kallioniemi, Assistant Professor, New Jersey Institute of Technology • Max Kanwal, PhD Student, Stanford University • Sven Truckenbrodt, Group Leader, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Secure AI • Huixin Zhan, Assistant Professor, New Mexico Tech • Keith Patarroyo, Research Fellow, University of Glasgow Keith Patarroyo • Mateo Petel, Research Scientist, Stanford University • Tianyi Alex Qiu, Research Fellow, Oxford Human-Centered AI Lab Tianyi Alex Qiu • Vivek Nair, CEO, Multifactor Nanotechnology • Alberto Privitera, Assistant Professor, University of Florence • Kathryn Shelley, Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Washington • Konlin Shen, Research and Development Engineer, University of California San Francisco • Qiancheng Xiong, Senior Scientist, A*STAR Bioprocessing Technology Institute Space • Philip Linden, Space Systems Engineer, Planet Labs PBC • Sidh Sikka, Co-Founder, Manifold Research Sidh Sikka Existential Hope • Abigail Olvera, Research Director, Golden Gate Institute for AI Abi Olvera • Fin Moorhouse, Researcher, Forethought Fin Moorhouse • Mahlaqua Mila Noor, Viral Immunologist, University of Cambridge • Ninon Lizé Masclef, Research Affiliate, MIT Media Lab Ninon Lizé Masclef • Peggy Yin, PhD Student, Stanford University • Ruairidh Battleday, AI Researchers & Founder, Thinking About Thinking Ruairidh Battleday Learn more about our Fellowship:

Foresight Institute

10,281 次观看 • 6 个月前

Parents & Students are upset about what took place between a student & representatives at Arkansas State University One student wrote I just got off the phone with the Chancellor’s office at Arkansas State University regarding what’s been happening on campus. It is extremely disappointing and unacceptable that representatives from Turning Point USA are reportedly on campus making derogatory and racist remarks toward Black individuals—using terms like “ghetto,” “dusty,” and “ashy.” That kind of language is harmful, disrespectful, and creates a hostile environment for students. Yes, A-State is a public university, and I understand that under the First Amendment, even offensive speech can be protected. Court rulings like Brandenburg v. Ohio make it clear that speech is protected unless it incites imminent violence or is a direct threat. But let’s be clear just because something is legally protected does NOT make it right. Universities still have a responsibility to ensure their students feel safe, respected, and supported. Speech that targets and degrades people based on race can contribute to a hostile and discriminatory environment, and that should never be ignored. This is bigger than “free speech.” This is about dignity. This is about respect. This is about protecting ALL students. I am calling on Arkansas State University to take this seriously, review the situation, enforce their policies, and stand firm in their commitment to an inclusive campus. We can uphold free speech AND hold people accountable for harmful behavior at the same time. NAACP NAACP highlight #lrhn

Parents & Students are upset about what took place between a student & representatives at Arkansas State University One student wrote I just got off the phone with the Chancellor’s office at Arkansas State University regarding what’s been happening on campus. It is extremely disappointing and unacceptable that representatives from Turning Point USA are reportedly on campus making derogatory and racist remarks toward Black individuals—using terms like “ghetto,” “dusty,” and “ashy.” That kind of language is harmful, disrespectful, and creates a hostile environment for students. Yes, A-State is a public university, and I understand that under the First Amendment, even offensive speech can be protected. Court rulings like Brandenburg v. Ohio make it clear that speech is protected unless it incites imminent violence or is a direct threat. But let’s be clear just because something is legally protected does NOT make it right. Universities still have a responsibility to ensure their students feel safe, respected, and supported. Speech that targets and degrades people based on race can contribute to a hostile and discriminatory environment, and that should never be ignored. This is bigger than “free speech.” This is about dignity. This is about respect. This is about protecting ALL students. I am calling on Arkansas State University to take this seriously, review the situation, enforce their policies, and stand firm in their commitment to an inclusive campus. We can uphold free speech AND hold people accountable for harmful behavior at the same time. NAACP NAACP highlight #lrhn

LRHN cash

11,793 次观看 • 3 个月前

“I always said I was anti-Zionist but not antisemitic” Taryn Thomas used to join campus protests at Stanford where students called Israel’s war with Hamas a genocide. Then, she attended the Nova exhibit, and learned for the first time about what actually happened on October 7th. Now, she realizes, those protests “had already decided how the story was going to end,” before Israel even responded to the massacre. This is exactly why Free Palestine protests the Nova exhibit wherever it opens. They are afraid that if more people learn the truth, their movement will run out of support. Video Credit: GB News

“I always said I was anti-Zionist but not antisemitic” Taryn Thomas used to join campus protests at Stanford where students called Israel’s war with Hamas a genocide. Then, she attended the Nova exhibit, and learned for the first time about what actually happened on October 7th. Now, she realizes, those protests “had already decided how the story was going to end,” before Israel even responded to the massacre. This is exactly why Free Palestine protests the Nova exhibit wherever it opens. They are afraid that if more people learn the truth, their movement will run out of support. Video Credit: GB News

Hen Mazzig

160,096 次观看 • 2 个月前

I wish all Europeans could watch this video to understand how pointless the sanctions against Russia have been. This is Eyck Freymann, a Hoover Fellow at Stanford University, specialized in international trade, speaking a few days ago at Harvard university (full video here: He did the research and not only does it show, in his words, that the sanctions were "a failure", but that in many ways Russia is doing better than before the war. They're taking in more oil revenue and ordinary Russians are "doing great", with significantly higher incomes (after inflation) than before the war. Hard not to come to the conclusion that, in effect, Europe is punishing itself first and foremost with its sanctions, all the more because the second-hand effect is that we now need to rely on much more expensive US energy. It really raises the question: who exactly is sanctioning whom here? 🤔

I wish all Europeans could watch this video to understand how pointless the sanctions against Russia have been. This is Eyck Freymann, a Hoover Fellow at Stanford University, specialized in international trade, speaking a few days ago at Harvard university (full video here: He did the research and not only does it show, in his words, that the sanctions were "a failure", but that in many ways Russia is doing better than before the war. They're taking in more oil revenue and ordinary Russians are "doing great", with significantly higher incomes (after inflation) than before the war. Hard not to come to the conclusion that, in effect, Europe is punishing itself first and foremost with its sanctions, all the more because the second-hand effect is that we now need to rely on much more expensive US energy. It really raises the question: who exactly is sanctioning whom here? 🤔

Arnaud Bertrand

97,233 次观看 • 10 个月前

CANDACE OWENS ON HARRISON BUTKER: “And it's so interesting to see how the world reacts, like to something that is so simple and true and honest and pure, you know, and a recent example… What did Harrison Butker do wrong? You mean this kicker gets on stage at a Catholic university and talks about how much he loves his wife and how grateful he is for everything that she does as a homemaker, and how she is the perfect yang to his yin, and how grateful he is that he has faith and that he has God and how he puts God first in his life And the whole world just collapses. The media just could not deal with this. They were like, “what are you talking about? How could you say such crazy things?” But if Harrison Butker had gotten up there and been like, listen, I’m on my third divorce, my child is trans, and, we're just going to let he/her she/they them pick his gender and make all the decisions, right because government is king. They would have been like, “he's a hero. He's amazing.” Candace Owens Turning Point USA

CANDACE OWENS ON HARRISON BUTKER: “And it's so interesting to see how the world reacts, like to something that is so simple and true and honest and pure, you know, and a recent example… What did Harrison Butker do wrong? You mean this kicker gets on stage at a Catholic university and talks about how much he loves his wife and how grateful he is for everything that she does as a homemaker, and how she is the perfect yang to his yin, and how grateful he is that he has faith and that he has God and how he puts God first in his life And the whole world just collapses. The media just could not deal with this. They were like, “what are you talking about? How could you say such crazy things?” But if Harrison Butker had gotten up there and been like, listen, I’m on my third divorce, my child is trans, and, we're just going to let he/her she/they them pick his gender and make all the decisions, right because government is king. They would have been like, “he's a hero. He's amazing.” Candace Owens Turning Point USA

Charlie Kirk

791,208 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨NEW: Charlamagne *ADMITS* he has engaged in rhetoric inciting violence against TRUMP and tells Jasmine Crockett to her face that she has too🚨 "I think we all incite — whether we think we do or not. And what I mean by that is I've definitely called that regime fascist." "If you hear somebody call him Hitler ... If there's somebody that thinks, 'Oh, Hitler!?' And then they look at a lot of the actions that are going on — they're like, 'Well, let's prevent this before 4 million people get killed.'" "So I can understand how all of it incites violence.'" Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Charlamagne ADMITS he has engaged in rhetoric inciting violence against TRUMP and tells Jasmine Crockett to her face that she has too🚨 "I think we all incite — whether we think we do or not. And what I mean by that is I've definitely called that regime fascist." "If you hear somebody call him Hitler ... If there's somebody that thinks, 'Oh, Hitler!?' And then they look at a lot of the actions that are going on — they're like, 'Well, let's prevent this before 4 million people get killed.'" "So I can understand how all of it incites violence.'" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

2,014,440 次观看 • 10 个月前

Stanford student Elsa Johnson is presumably “Anna” in the investigative article “Uncovering Chinese Academic Espionage at Stanford” published in The Stanford Review in May. Now Elsa speaks out in person. It all started with a message sent to Elsa on Instagram by a stranger, a man calling himself Charles Chen and claiming he’s an international student at Stanford, on June 10, 2024. “Have we met on campus?” It’s the same playbook: someone claiming to be a 🇨🇳 student “slips into your DMs”. They start out friendly with inquiries about your home life and ask whether or not you have mutual friends. Sometimes they point out shared interests and invite you to hang out. Then the hard sell begins, with offers of an all-expenses-paid trip to China. They might flatter you with compliments and claim you can make money in the country as a social media star. If the conversation progresses, they may ask about your research, academic achievements over the years or the software you might use in class. This is exactly what Charles did. He shared videos of another woman he claimed was a Stanford student. “She was on a TV show in China and is famous now!” The implication: Elsa, too, could become prosperous and popular in China. On June 27, Charles pressed the point. “You really should travel to China soon … A bunch of people at Stanford have been to China this summer. If someone pays for you, would you come?” He sent her a flight itinerary from LA to Shanghai that cost $912 with China Eastern Airlines. “I can take care of your accommodation and transportation here.” He showed her a bank wire worth $5,485 that he received in May to prove he could afford it. Elsa told him it’s too expensive but he persisted. “It’s not worth it for a quick trip,” she replied. Elsa alerted two trusted Chinese experts at Stanford to tell them she’s worried she’s being targeted. They put her in touch with an FBI contact who worked with the college on cases of CCP-related espionage. She met them in Sep, handing over the screenshots and the names of other people that Charles said he had been in touch with. Charles was found to have no affiliation with Stanford. He had probably posed for years as a student with fake Instagram and LinkedIn profiles that he used to target people researching China-related topics. Elsa identified as many as 10 other female students who had been targeted by this individual since 2020. Charles was likely to be associated with 🇨🇳 ministry of state security, and he’s probably conducting an elaborate entrapment operation targeting young female students. The FBI confirmed that several of the 1,129 🇨🇳 students at Stanford were reporting to the CCP. The fact that he targeted young, white American women is significant. The CCP apparently sees people like Elsa as valuable assets in their propaganda war, who can give the impression that there’s nothing to fear from China. These spies want to learn how leading universities such as Stanford are developing key technologies that are giving the US an edge over China. They target young, sometimes naive, students working in these fields with the aim of befriending them and grooming them to share their knowledge. Some students have even been approached by strangers about working for Chinese tech companies such as Baidu and Huawei. Most students see thru this espionage. But inevitably, some don’t, and accidentally disclose sensitive info. Others may even be sympathetic to the CCP’s cause and knowingly cooperate. Perhaps Charles assumed Elsa could be persuaded to spy on other Stanford students. At first Elsa was extremely frightened to talk about what happened to her out of fear of being further targeted. She loves Chinese culture and wants to be able to visit China, but speaking out could lead to retaliation by 🇨🇳 authorities. But now she realizes that her experience is emblematic of Beijing’s larger efforts to infiltrate US institutions and she has to do something.

Stanford student Elsa Johnson is presumably “Anna” in the investigative article “Uncovering Chinese Academic Espionage at Stanford” published in The Stanford Review in May. Now Elsa speaks out in person. It all started with a message sent to Elsa on Instagram by a stranger, a man calling himself Charles Chen and claiming he’s an international student at Stanford, on June 10, 2024. “Have we met on campus?” It’s the same playbook: someone claiming to be a 🇨🇳 student “slips into your DMs”. They start out friendly with inquiries about your home life and ask whether or not you have mutual friends. Sometimes they point out shared interests and invite you to hang out. Then the hard sell begins, with offers of an all-expenses-paid trip to China. They might flatter you with compliments and claim you can make money in the country as a social media star. If the conversation progresses, they may ask about your research, academic achievements over the years or the software you might use in class. This is exactly what Charles did. He shared videos of another woman he claimed was a Stanford student. “She was on a TV show in China and is famous now!” The implication: Elsa, too, could become prosperous and popular in China. On June 27, Charles pressed the point. “You really should travel to China soon … A bunch of people at Stanford have been to China this summer. If someone pays for you, would you come?” He sent her a flight itinerary from LA to Shanghai that cost $912 with China Eastern Airlines. “I can take care of your accommodation and transportation here.” He showed her a bank wire worth $5,485 that he received in May to prove he could afford it. Elsa told him it’s too expensive but he persisted. “It’s not worth it for a quick trip,” she replied. Elsa alerted two trusted Chinese experts at Stanford to tell them she’s worried she’s being targeted. They put her in touch with an FBI contact who worked with the college on cases of CCP-related espionage. She met them in Sep, handing over the screenshots and the names of other people that Charles said he had been in touch with. Charles was found to have no affiliation with Stanford. He had probably posed for years as a student with fake Instagram and LinkedIn profiles that he used to target people researching China-related topics. Elsa identified as many as 10 other female students who had been targeted by this individual since 2020. Charles was likely to be associated with 🇨🇳 ministry of state security, and he’s probably conducting an elaborate entrapment operation targeting young female students. The FBI confirmed that several of the 1,129 🇨🇳 students at Stanford were reporting to the CCP. The fact that he targeted young, white American women is significant. The CCP apparently sees people like Elsa as valuable assets in their propaganda war, who can give the impression that there’s nothing to fear from China. These spies want to learn how leading universities such as Stanford are developing key technologies that are giving the US an edge over China. They target young, sometimes naive, students working in these fields with the aim of befriending them and grooming them to share their knowledge. Some students have even been approached by strangers about working for Chinese tech companies such as Baidu and Huawei. Most students see thru this espionage. But inevitably, some don’t, and accidentally disclose sensitive info. Others may even be sympathetic to the CCP’s cause and knowingly cooperate. Perhaps Charles assumed Elsa could be persuaded to spy on other Stanford students. At first Elsa was extremely frightened to talk about what happened to her out of fear of being further targeted. She loves Chinese culture and wants to be able to visit China, but speaking out could lead to retaliation by 🇨🇳 authorities. But now she realizes that her experience is emblematic of Beijing’s larger efforts to infiltrate US institutions and she has to do something.

Byron Wan

114,292 次观看 • 11 个月前

Ilya Sutskever, the co-founder of OpenAI, on the one AI risk that grows with every jump in capability. "There are concerns around if an AGI ever becomes very, very powerful, which is possible. Maybe it will want to go rogue, being that it is an agent." "We are also doing a lot of research on addressing the technological side of things, so that the AI will never want to go rogue. And this is something which I am working on as well." The work he is describing has a name: the assurance layer. Proving a powerful, agentic system will not go rogue before you deploy it, not after. That layer does not build itself. It gets built by the labs, regulators, and insurers who agree on how to test and verify these systems. P.S. That is the entire agenda of the AI Assurance and Governance Summit. Frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers, and investors in one room at Stanford on October 1. Reserve a seat: - Ilya Sutskever (Ilya Sutskever), co-founder of OpenAI, at TED

Ilya Sutskever, the co-founder of OpenAI, on the one AI risk that grows with every jump in capability. "There are concerns around if an AGI ever becomes very, very powerful, which is possible. Maybe it will want to go rogue, being that it is an agent." "We are also doing a lot of research on addressing the technological side of things, so that the AI will never want to go rogue. And this is something which I am working on as well." The work he is describing has a name: the assurance layer. Proving a powerful, agentic system will not go rogue before you deploy it, not after. That layer does not build itself. It gets built by the labs, regulators, and insurers who agree on how to test and verify these systems. P.S. That is the entire agenda of the AI Assurance and Governance Summit. Frontier labs, regulated industries, insurers, and investors in one room at Stanford on October 1. Reserve a seat: - Ilya Sutskever (Ilya Sutskever), co-founder of OpenAI, at TED

Karl Mehta

22,453 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is from Socialism 2025 and is the Revolutionary Accompaniment: Holding Each Other When Things Fall Apart Professor Eman Abdelhadi says she brings intense emotional distress into her academic life—and believes modeling that grief is part of her political responsibility. “I have cried so many times on campus in ways like as a, you know, young brown, queer woman... and then like the genocide started and people are like how are you? I’m like—” “I cried during every rally speech I gave on campus... and how dare you expect these students to be OK? Like why? Why would I be OK?” “It would be sick if I was able to put on this performance for you that I'm fine.” She frames public emotional unraveling not as something to manage, but as a necessary political act: “As a Palestinian there is a political tool to that... I think being incredibly sad is important.” And she's open about canceling work or redirecting student meetings around her emotional state: “We’re not meeting today because I’m actually too upset to meet.” “After our encampment was raided... my students were main organizers... So we don’t do this weird inhuman thing where we pretend you didn’t just get a tent ripped out from under you by the police. Let’s talk about that first.” This isn’t support. It’s not pedagogy. It’s ideology via emotional exhibition—politicized despair as a teaching method. You decide if that belongs in a university classroom.

This is from Socialism 2025 and is the Revolutionary Accompaniment: Holding Each Other When Things Fall Apart Professor Eman Abdelhadi says she brings intense emotional distress into her academic life—and believes modeling that grief is part of her political responsibility. “I have cried so many times on campus in ways like as a, you know, young brown, queer woman... and then like the genocide started and people are like how are you? I’m like—” “I cried during every rally speech I gave on campus... and how dare you expect these students to be OK? Like why? Why would I be OK?” “It would be sick if I was able to put on this performance for you that I'm fine.” She frames public emotional unraveling not as something to manage, but as a necessary political act: “As a Palestinian there is a political tool to that... I think being incredibly sad is important.” And she's open about canceling work or redirecting student meetings around her emotional state: “We’re not meeting today because I’m actually too upset to meet.” “After our encampment was raided... my students were main organizers... So we don’t do this weird inhuman thing where we pretend you didn’t just get a tent ripped out from under you by the police. Let’s talk about that first.” This isn’t support. It’s not pedagogy. It’s ideology via emotional exhibition—politicized despair as a teaching method. You decide if that belongs in a university classroom.

Stu

80,314 次观看 • 1 年前

Citadel Founder Ken Griffin at the Stanford Leadership Forum 2026 discussing how AI agents compress elite analytical work from months into hours: "It has been interesting to watch...work that we would usually do with people with master's and PhDs in finance over the course of weeks or months, being done by AI agents over the course of hours or days. So these are not mid-tier white-collar jobs. These are like extraordinarily high-skilled jobs being ...automated by agentic AI. And I got to tell you, I went home one Friday, actually fairly depressed by this because you could just see how this was going to have such a dramatic impact on society."

Citadel Founder Ken Griffin at the Stanford Leadership Forum 2026 discussing how AI agents compress elite analytical work from months into hours: "It has been interesting to watch...work that we would usually do with people with master's and PhDs in finance over the course of weeks or months, being done by AI agents over the course of hours or days. So these are not mid-tier white-collar jobs. These are like extraordinarily high-skilled jobs being ...automated by agentic AI. And I got to tell you, I went home one Friday, actually fairly depressed by this because you could just see how this was going to have such a dramatic impact on society."

The Transcript

186,329 次观看 • 2 个月前

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But Peter would enforce this pretty strictly. He'd basically say: 'I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I've assigned to you. I don't want to hear about how great you're doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.'... The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they're difficult--you don't wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate... If you have a company that's always solving B+ problems, you'll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it" Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But Peter would enforce this pretty strictly. He'd basically say: 'I will not talk to you about anything else except for this one thing that I've assigned to you. I don't want to hear about how great you're doing in this other area. Just focus until you conquer this one problem.'... The insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high-impact problems for your company but they're difficult--you don't wake up in the morning with a solution to them, so you tend to procrastinate... If you have a company that's always solving B+ problems, you'll never create the breakthrough idea because no one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it" Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

108,875 次观看 • 1 年前

Former Pro-Palestine protestor Taryn Thomas explains how the October 7th terrorist attack changed her outlook completely: “After October 7th, by October 20th, Stanford already set up its encampment, 'Sit-In to Stop Genocide." This is before the families had even finished identifying their dead. This is a week before a single soldier had even crossed into Gaza, and we were already labeling it a genocide. There was no time spent to even grieve those that lost their lives, and if you did grieve and mourn publicly, you were immediately outcasted and you lost your social belonging. At one of our protests in June of 2024, they broke into the Stanford University President's office and caused $700,000 in damages. 12 students received felonies, and they spray-painted like disgusting things, such as ‘Death to Israel,’ ‘Death to America.’ I was just confused on like, where is Gaza in any of that? We completely lost sight of who we were claiming to be fighting for, and at some point our pro-Palestine movement became more of an anti-Israel, anti-American one, and I no longer could recognize what we were doing anymore.”

Former Pro-Palestine protestor Taryn Thomas explains how the October 7th terrorist attack changed her outlook completely: “After October 7th, by October 20th, Stanford already set up its encampment, 'Sit-In to Stop Genocide." This is before the families had even finished identifying their dead. This is a week before a single soldier had even crossed into Gaza, and we were already labeling it a genocide. There was no time spent to even grieve those that lost their lives, and if you did grieve and mourn publicly, you were immediately outcasted and you lost your social belonging. At one of our protests in June of 2024, they broke into the Stanford University President's office and caused $700,000 in damages. 12 students received felonies, and they spray-painted like disgusting things, such as ‘Death to Israel,’ ‘Death to America.’ I was just confused on like, where is Gaza in any of that? We completely lost sight of who we were claiming to be fighting for, and at some point our pro-Palestine movement became more of an anti-Israel, anti-American one, and I no longer could recognize what we were doing anymore.”

Glenn Beck

106,534 次观看 • 2 个月前