Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Keith Rabois on the “one person, one problem" framework he learned from Peter Thiel "Peter Thiel used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled. You feel like it's insulting to be asked to do just one thing. But...

108,875 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Startup Archive
Startup Archive1 год назад

Keith Rabois on building effective teams:

Фото профиля Startup Archive
Startup Archive1 год назад

Keith Rabois’ formula for startup success:

Фото профиля Anthony Dohrmann
Anthony Dohrmann1 год назад

@_joebaffoe Yes!!!! This is the direction we’ve started to take!

Фото профиля growthesque
growthesque1 год назад

@curious_vii This is interesting. Also known as "deliberate practice". Stay with the most intimidating aspect on the pipeline.

Фото профиля Venkat
Venkat1 год назад

Love the focus on A+ problems. It's uncomfortable, but breakthroughs come from the relentless pursuit of what’s hard, not what's easy. Solving one critical problem with full attention is better than juggling several mediocre ones. 💡🔨👍

Фото профиля Arthur MacWaters
Arthur MacWaters1 год назад

This seems to work really well in practice Eg for us - growth - patient experience - revenue collection Also, in the age of AI, it makes a lot of sense to build your company so that one expert works with a web of LLMs and automations to manage an entire area -

Фото профиля Luca Howey
Luca Howey1 год назад

I think it's a trade-off that you have to decide if you are willing to take.

Фото профиля Productivity Tool Channel
Productivity Tool Channel1 год назад

This approach can drive deeper problem-solving and innovation, encouraging teams to tackle high-impact A+ problems rather than getting sidetracked by easier B+ ones. By dedicating all their efforts to a singular, challenging problem, teams can unleash their full potential and create truly groundbreaking solutions.

Фото профиля kame hame
kame hame1 год назад

@readwise save thread

Фото профиля penguinpecker🐧
penguinpecker🐧1 год назад

💯

Похожие видео

Naval Ravikant on the importance of hiring high-agency people Naval defines agency as: “People who just solve problems without even being asked to solve the problem—they identify the problem, they go solve it, they don’t even necessarily have to update you every step of the way, they’re not asking silly questions, and they’re just coming up with solutions.” He believes this is important because “building a startup is an infinite set of problems that are being thrown at you.” And there comes a day where you can’t even look at every problem your company is facing—let alone solve every one of them. He cites the Vinod Khosla aphorism: "The team you build is the company you build, not the plan you make.” And your ability to solve problems is based entirely on how many problem-solvers you have at your company. As Naval puts it: “If you have somebody who takes 10% of your time and management to solve problems, you can only have 10 of those people working with you. But if somebody takes 5%, you can have 20 of those people.” When building Airchat and AngelList, he thought of each team as a Navy Seal team: “Everyone is just really good at what they do. They know their job. They do it. They don’t complain. They’re not egotistical about it. And if they have to constantly be corrected, led around by the nose, you have to clean up after them, or you question their judgement, it’s not going to work out.”

Startup Archive

552,702 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Keith Rabois on the 3 most important lessons he learned from Peter Thiel “I’ve been working with Peter professionally for 23 years… The most important [lesson] in building a company is the importance of finding undiscovered talent… Back then we were competing with Yahoo and Microsoft for talent, but fundamentally you can’t compete on talent by going after the exact same people that companies with infinite profits will pay and overpay for. So Peter had a lesson that you basically had to hire people under 30 — and the point was not to be agist. Instead he realized that by the time you’re 30, everyone who runs a hiring algorithm should be able to roughly come to the same conclusions… It’s a little bit like sports where when you draft athletes for the NBA out of high school — there’s more alpha there than in signing a free agent who’s been playing in the league for 10 years.” The second most important lesson Keith learned from Peter was the value of time: “People systematically — in Peter’s words — undervalue their time.” You have to be extremely disciplined about where you’re allocating your time because it goes hand in hand with the third lesson, which is the value of focus: “Peter can be extreme when he has a view — he takes it all the way to the polar extreme. He had this mandate at PayPal about focus that every single person in the organization — when we had 300 people in the Bay Area — was allowed to do exactly one thing. And Peter would refuse to talk to you about any topic that was not that one thing, period… But fundamentally, the discipline of only being allowed to do one thing led to significant breakthroughs.” Keith explains: “What basically happens is there are really hard challenges at any startup and it’s easy to divert your attention to the problems you know how to solve. But those are not the breakthroughs or 10x ideas. And when Peter would say to me, ‘I need you to fix this and I literally won’t talk to you for the next month or two until you fix it,’ it would force me to bang my head against the wall every single day, and once in a while it would lead to a, ‘holy cow there’s an answer — we can do this.’ Now imagine that across an organization of 300 people — 5 or 10 ideas that probably wouldn’t have happened are a direct result of Peter’s managing philosophy.” Video source: Khosla Ventures (2023)

Startup Archive

60,734 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel on how to build the next billion-dollar startup: "Every moment in the history of business happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg won't be starting a social networking site. The next Bill Gates won't start an operating system. The next Elon Musk won't start a Tesla electric car company." Peter's entire thesis rejects the idea of formulas in business. As he puts it: "Science starts with things that are experimentally repeatable, but great businesses are zero to one; they're always one-of-a-kind. There is always this anti-formulaic quality." So what's the one theme he keeps coming back to? "This need for differentiation. What are you doing that nobody else is doing? What ideas do you have that nobody else has? What great business are you working on that no one else is working on?" He continues: "If you're a founder or an entrepreneur, you should always aim to build a monopoly where you're the only person in the world doing what you're doing. There really are only two kinds of businesses in this world: businesses that are in crazy competition and one-of-a-kind businesses that are monopolies." On why you shouldn't just iterate your way to success: "The core thing is to have a great product, and then you can always improve and iterate on that. If you're just trying to optimize and you don't have a great product, that rarely works." His advice? Think 5 to 10 years ahead: "Why will this be a really valuable business in 5 to 10 years? How's the competitive landscape going to develop? These are hard questions to answer, but the great entrepreneurs I know always have some perspective on it. When I was playing chess, one of the early lessons I learned was, a bad plan is still always better than no plan at all." On what makes work meaningful: "It's great to be working on problems where if you weren't working on them, nobody else would do them. If we weren't doing this, this problem would absolutely not be tackled. That's what's meaningful. Whereas when you're competing, you're already, by definition, number two at least in a category." Build something only you can build.

Jaynit

77,758 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад