Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

How it started misunderstanding and fights. But Superb Ending love and marriage 🎊 ஒரு செல்பி எடுக்கப்போய் தெரியாம அது முத்தத்துல முடிய அங்க ஆரம்பிக்கிற சண்டை அப்புறம் எப்படி புரிதலோட காதலா மாறுதுதான் கதை My one of the favorite movie 🤩 Movie Name . Geetha govindam 🥳

Aarathana

12,199 subscribers

27,885 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

John Travolta explains why "A Man and a Woman" (1966) is one of his favourite movies of all time: "All my favorite movies are French. 'A Man and a Woman' (1966) and 'Going Places' (1974) are my two favorite movies. My two favorite American movies? I don't know, they've changed over the years. But I think 'A Man and a Woman' (1966) is the most romantic movie ever made. Just because it captured the real feelings of two people falling in love, and it had music that matched those feelings and images that matched those feelings. It was a marriage of all three. To me, every image of that movie looks like a work of art." (John Travolta's interview with Paul Chutkow, Cigaraficionado, 1999) P.S: On this day, 60 years ago, Claude Lelouch's "A Man and a Woman" (1966) premiered at the Cannes Film Festival, France.

John Travolta explains why "A Man and a Woman" (1966) is one of his favourite movies of all time: "All my favorite movies are French. 'A Man and a Woman' (1966) and 'Going Places' (1974) are my two favorite movies. My two favorite American movies? I don't know, they've changed over the years. But I think 'A Man and a Woman' (1966) is the most romantic movie ever made. Just because it captured the real feelings of two people falling in love, and it had music that matched those feelings and images that matched those feelings. It was a marriage of all three. To me, every image of that movie looks like a work of art." (John Travolta's interview with Paul Chutkow, Cigaraficionado, 1999) P.S: On this day, 60 years ago, Claude Lelouch's "A Man and a Woman" (1966) premiered at the Cannes Film Festival, France.

DepressedBergman

104,507 views • 3 months ago

Midnight Run is calling my name again. I don’t know why I always find myself face-to-face with this movie on Sundays, especially in the summer, but this is just one of those films I find myself returning to over and over again regardless of how many times I’ve seen it. No one does comedy & drama like De Niro. No one.

Midnight Run is calling my name again. I don’t know why I always find myself face-to-face with this movie on Sundays, especially in the summer, but this is just one of those films I find myself returning to over and over again regardless of how many times I’ve seen it. No one does comedy & drama like De Niro. No one.

Cinema Tweets

12,706 views • 18 days ago

Genevieve Hannelius via instagram: “Hannah Montana was part of my childhood in more ways than one. It was my favorite show growing up and one of my first acting jobs. I only had a few lines, but Miley couldn't have been nicer to me. She even remembered my name when I went to the Hannah Montana Movie premiere. That's the sort of small kindness you never forget and tells you everything you need to know about a person. Hannah Montana forever!”

Genevieve Hannelius via instagram: “Hannah Montana was part of my childhood in more ways than one. It was my favorite show growing up and one of my first acting jobs. I only had a few lines, but Miley couldn't have been nicer to me. She even remembered my name when I went to the Hannah Montana Movie premiere. That's the sort of small kindness you never forget and tells you everything you need to know about a person. Hannah Montana forever!”

Miley Crave

1,271,560 views • 4 months ago

1986 Vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe said Fauci to Reagan Isn't it interesting, inauguration was held from the Rotunda. The last time that happened was 1985. Ronald Reagan's second term in office. We know a lot about 1986 where Tony Fauci and Pharma told then President Reagan that when he said, make vaccines safer, there were so many injuries and lawsuits piled up. And I hope your audience will go back and watch the movie 1986 the Act. I think you can still find it if you type in Andy (Wakefield) made the movie, but the star of that movie was an attorney, one of my favorite environmental attorneys, maybe my second favorite, next to Bobby Kennedy, Jr, is Michael R Hugo and Michael R Hugo along with Barbara Lowe Fisher in 1984. Barbara Lowe Fisher wrote the book, a Shot in the Dark all the way back to 1984 about injuries from the DTP shots, as we all know from our books, Plague, Plague of Corruption, and Ending Plague, of course. So you see, this plague of corruption has been in my lifetime, since 1975 and I started in 1980 at the National Cancer Institute. But 1976 I started at the University of Virginia. So I understood true science, which is only God's natural law. Judy Mikovits, PhD - 01/20/2025 Darrell Wolfe and the Dr Judy Show: Uncensored Books:

1986 Vaccines are Unavoidably Unsafe said Fauci to Reagan Isn't it interesting, inauguration was held from the Rotunda. The last time that happened was 1985. Ronald Reagan's second term in office. We know a lot about 1986 where Tony Fauci and Pharma told then President Reagan that when he said, make vaccines safer, there were so many injuries and lawsuits piled up. And I hope your audience will go back and watch the movie 1986 the Act. I think you can still find it if you type in Andy (Wakefield) made the movie, but the star of that movie was an attorney, one of my favorite environmental attorneys, maybe my second favorite, next to Bobby Kennedy, Jr, is Michael R Hugo and Michael R Hugo along with Barbara Lowe Fisher in 1984. Barbara Lowe Fisher wrote the book, a Shot in the Dark all the way back to 1984 about injuries from the DTP shots, as we all know from our books, Plague, Plague of Corruption, and Ending Plague, of course. So you see, this plague of corruption has been in my lifetime, since 1975 and I started in 1980 at the National Cancer Institute. But 1976 I started at the University of Virginia. So I understood true science, which is only God's natural law. Judy Mikovits, PhD - 01/20/2025 Darrell Wolfe and the Dr Judy Show: Uncensored Books:

Judy A. Mikovits PhD

54,775 views • 1 year ago

Gaspar Noé on Uli Edel's 'Christiane F.' (1981): "We had some film references also in mind when we shot 'Climax' (2018). Like the most unexpected one, probably, is 'Christiane F.' (1981). I re-watched it for the eighth time lately, and it’s a big melodrama, very, very hardcore, with young kids doing drugs and coming to prost!tute themselves to save their love story, but what amazed me when I re-watched the movie was how colourful the movie was, and how well-dressed the characters were. It’s very joyful in terms of colour, in terms of music. The movie is totally dark, and it’s dirty. So I asked both my cinematographer, my production designer – who was repainting all the locations – and my stylist, to be as colourful as they could be, but with scenes that would always look dirty. (...) Really what I liked about 'Christiane F'. was that it was so respectful to every single one of its characters – the movie was, and the director was." (Gaspar Noé's interview with Ben Mortimer, Den of Geek, 2018) P.S: On this day, 45 years ago, "Christiane F" (1981) was released in the USA.

Gaspar Noé on Uli Edel's 'Christiane F.' (1981): "We had some film references also in mind when we shot 'Climax' (2018). Like the most unexpected one, probably, is 'Christiane F.' (1981). I re-watched it for the eighth time lately, and it’s a big melodrama, very, very hardcore, with young kids doing drugs and coming to prost!tute themselves to save their love story, but what amazed me when I re-watched the movie was how colourful the movie was, and how well-dressed the characters were. It’s very joyful in terms of colour, in terms of music. The movie is totally dark, and it’s dirty. So I asked both my cinematographer, my production designer – who was repainting all the locations – and my stylist, to be as colourful as they could be, but with scenes that would always look dirty. (...) Really what I liked about 'Christiane F'. was that it was so respectful to every single one of its characters – the movie was, and the director was." (Gaspar Noé's interview with Ben Mortimer, Den of Geek, 2018) P.S: On this day, 45 years ago, "Christiane F" (1981) was released in the USA.

DepressedBergman

111,366 views • 4 months ago

John Carpenter on how Howard Hawks's "Rio Bravo" (1959) inspired him to become a filmmaker: "As I got older I began to see that certain directors did certain things. One of the earliest examples of this was Roger Corman. I started going to see these exciting, fast, kind of cheesy but really fun monster movies, and there was one name that kept coming up on the screen: Roger Corman. 'It Conquered the World' (1956), 'Not of This Earth' (1957), 'Attack of the Crab Monsters' (1957), 'The Undead' (1957)... But | really understood for the first time what a director did when I saw 'Rio Bravo' in 1959. There was something about that movie that was like home and I can't really explain it. It was held over in Bowling Green for three or four weeks in a row because people kept coming to see it. I abandoned to see what was new in the other movie house in town to see this movie every weekend again and again because there was something in it that was different from the other westerns I had seen. I had certainly seen John Wayne before. He had become a part of my growing-up experience. He was the action guy, the cowboy. He was the guy in 'Flying Tigers' (1942) who was flying the airplanes. So what was so different about that movie? Then I became aware of this credit: “Howard Hawks’ Rio Bravo.” I looked at the poster and I said to myself, “Who is this guy? He didn't write the movie and he wasn't starring in it so why is his name up here? And why is he last in the credits?” All these things started to occur to me, but it was the emotional impact of the film that got me to start using my brain. Some way I figure out that this director made that movie." ("The Prince of Darkness: The Prince of Darkness", Gilles Boulenger, 2001) P.S: Remembering the great American filmmaker Howard Hawks on his 130th birthday.

John Carpenter on how Howard Hawks's "Rio Bravo" (1959) inspired him to become a filmmaker: "As I got older I began to see that certain directors did certain things. One of the earliest examples of this was Roger Corman. I started going to see these exciting, fast, kind of cheesy but really fun monster movies, and there was one name that kept coming up on the screen: Roger Corman. 'It Conquered the World' (1956), 'Not of This Earth' (1957), 'Attack of the Crab Monsters' (1957), 'The Undead' (1957)... But | really understood for the first time what a director did when I saw 'Rio Bravo' in 1959. There was something about that movie that was like home and I can't really explain it. It was held over in Bowling Green for three or four weeks in a row because people kept coming to see it. I abandoned to see what was new in the other movie house in town to see this movie every weekend again and again because there was something in it that was different from the other westerns I had seen. I had certainly seen John Wayne before. He had become a part of my growing-up experience. He was the action guy, the cowboy. He was the guy in 'Flying Tigers' (1942) who was flying the airplanes. So what was so different about that movie? Then I became aware of this credit: “Howard Hawks’ Rio Bravo.” I looked at the poster and I said to myself, “Who is this guy? He didn't write the movie and he wasn't starring in it so why is his name up here? And why is he last in the credits?” All these things started to occur to me, but it was the emotional impact of the film that got me to start using my brain. Some way I figure out that this director made that movie." ("The Prince of Darkness: The Prince of Darkness", Gilles Boulenger, 2001) P.S: Remembering the great American filmmaker Howard Hawks on his 130th birthday.

DepressedBergman

55,688 views • 2 months ago

John Waters on his obsession with "The Wizard of Oz" (1939) & his thoughts on the movie being considered a "Gay classic": "Interviewer: Do you remember how old you were and where you saw it? Waters: I probably saw it at the Senator Theater in Baltimore the first time, which I still have my movie premieres in. I probably saw it there and then on TV every year. But certainly I saw it at the movies as a kid. I don’t remember how old I was, and it wasn’t the first movie I saw, but it was close to it. It was a complete, complete obsession from the very, very beginning. Now, today, you have video. We couldn’t do that, so you had to wait once a year to see it. That’s that sadness about the magic of movies: you can watch it over and over, and you can rewind it, see how everything is done. Still, is there a better tornado scene? To me, all these really expensive digital effects are very uninvolving. That tornado scene is as good as 'Twister' (1996) to me, and I think it’s done with a nylon stocking Interviewer: It’s a great surrealist scene, too. Waters: And how radical—the black and white to color is almost like an LSD effect. It is a drug movie almost. (...) Interviewer: Why do you think it’s become associated with the gay community, as being a “gay classic”? Waters: See, to me, I don’t think it’s that much of a gay movie. Judy Garland is, but I don’t think so much of that movie. Of course, this is her first one, but she wasn’t tragic in that movie, except later they found out she was on diet pills when she was singing. I think it’s only a gay movie, if it is, only because of Judy Garland’s later suffering in her life and melodrama. I love Judy Garland, but did she ever marry a straight man? I don’t know. Did anyone in the family? It’s a tradition. But basically, I don’t think of it as a gay film. I know “Friends of Dorothy,” but I think it’s because of Judy Garland’s later career. Well, it might be a gay children’s movie. I don’t think it’s a gay adult’s movie. I know drag queens do the Wicked Witch, but I never saw one. It’s not a drag role." ("The Film that Changed my Life", Robert K. Elder, 2011)

John Waters on his obsession with "The Wizard of Oz" (1939) & his thoughts on the movie being considered a "Gay classic": "Interviewer: Do you remember how old you were and where you saw it? Waters: I probably saw it at the Senator Theater in Baltimore the first time, which I still have my movie premieres in. I probably saw it there and then on TV every year. But certainly I saw it at the movies as a kid. I don’t remember how old I was, and it wasn’t the first movie I saw, but it was close to it. It was a complete, complete obsession from the very, very beginning. Now, today, you have video. We couldn’t do that, so you had to wait once a year to see it. That’s that sadness about the magic of movies: you can watch it over and over, and you can rewind it, see how everything is done. Still, is there a better tornado scene? To me, all these really expensive digital effects are very uninvolving. That tornado scene is as good as 'Twister' (1996) to me, and I think it’s done with a nylon stocking Interviewer: It’s a great surrealist scene, too. Waters: And how radical—the black and white to color is almost like an LSD effect. It is a drug movie almost. (...) Interviewer: Why do you think it’s become associated with the gay community, as being a “gay classic”? Waters: See, to me, I don’t think it’s that much of a gay movie. Judy Garland is, but I don’t think so much of that movie. Of course, this is her first one, but she wasn’t tragic in that movie, except later they found out she was on diet pills when she was singing. I think it’s only a gay movie, if it is, only because of Judy Garland’s later suffering in her life and melodrama. I love Judy Garland, but did she ever marry a straight man? I don’t know. Did anyone in the family? It’s a tradition. But basically, I don’t think of it as a gay film. I know “Friends of Dorothy,” but I think it’s because of Judy Garland’s later career. Well, it might be a gay children’s movie. I don’t think it’s a gay adult’s movie. I know drag queens do the Wicked Witch, but I never saw one. It’s not a drag role." ("The Film that Changed my Life", Robert K. Elder, 2011)

DepressedBergman

31,006 views • 2 months ago

TREMORS remains one of my favorite creature features. The screenwriting doesn't try to do too much. It takes a simple premise of "Jaws on land" and executes it with joy and affection. It has legitimate tension, fantastic performances, and a terrific sense of humor. The reveal in this clip of just how many weapons they have in their "rec room" is a superb example. I was a part-time manager of a movie theatre when this was released. We would watch movies the night before they opened to test the print, and we had no idea what to expect. It was such a wonderful surprise. I still kind of light up when it's mentioned. If you haven't seen it, make a point.

TREMORS remains one of my favorite creature features. The screenwriting doesn't try to do too much. It takes a simple premise of "Jaws on land" and executes it with joy and affection. It has legitimate tension, fantastic performances, and a terrific sense of humor. The reveal in this clip of just how many weapons they have in their "rec room" is a superb example. I was a part-time manager of a movie theatre when this was released. We would watch movies the night before they opened to test the print, and we had no idea what to expect. It was such a wonderful surprise. I still kind of light up when it's mentioned. If you haven't seen it, make a point.

Tom Vaughan

428,385 views • 2 years ago

I have watched OVERBOARD countless times. Every generation in my family loved it. It is eminently rewatchable. The great Garry Marshall had a phenomenal run of romantic comedies, and this remains my favorite. There is some suspension of disbelief required, as even as a high schooler, I saw this scene and thought, "That ain't right." No matter how awful she is! But the film is so good-natured, the chemistry and comic timing is perfection, and an early script by yet another great, Leslie Dixon, is superb. How it gets us rooting for them and screaming, "Oh no!" when her husband shows up is an absolute magic trick. It is because I loved movies like this just so much that I never wanted to focus on one genre. Kurt Russell made USED CARS and ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK back-to-back, so I wasn't surprised by his range at the time. But as I get older, I am more and more amazed by it. What a gift he and Goldie Hawn are in this film. I love this movie.

I have watched OVERBOARD countless times. Every generation in my family loved it. It is eminently rewatchable. The great Garry Marshall had a phenomenal run of romantic comedies, and this remains my favorite. There is some suspension of disbelief required, as even as a high schooler, I saw this scene and thought, "That ain't right." No matter how awful she is! But the film is so good-natured, the chemistry and comic timing is perfection, and an early script by yet another great, Leslie Dixon, is superb. How it gets us rooting for them and screaming, "Oh no!" when her husband shows up is an absolute magic trick. It is because I loved movies like this just so much that I never wanted to focus on one genre. Kurt Russell made USED CARS and ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK back-to-back, so I wasn't surprised by his range at the time. But as I get older, I am more and more amazed by it. What a gift he and Goldie Hawn are in this film. I love this movie.

Tom Vaughan

19,452 views • 3 months ago

The most UNDER-RATED mainstream movie of the last decade is #JaggaJasoos. It has really gone up in my estimation with every repeat viewing. It demands your unremitting attention but if you wholeheartedly invest three hours, you'll enjoy it. I marvel at the detailing in each frame every time I see it. #AnuragBasu made this movie with immense love, passion and imagination. An adventure, detective musical with dollops of romance. Now that is a unique "space" which no one has explored in Bollywood at least. And it goes without saying that #RanbirKapoor is outstanding. He didn't miss a beat. I've attached the most beautifully poignant scene from the movie. How well Ranbir has emoted. There's no one who can portray poignancy better than him on screen. Kudos to Ranbir and Basu for backing this audacious film. I'm sure it'll get its due over a period of time. VIDEO Credit - Siddharth Roy Kapur and Ranbir Kapoor

The most UNDER-RATED mainstream movie of the last decade is #JaggaJasoos. It has really gone up in my estimation with every repeat viewing. It demands your unremitting attention but if you wholeheartedly invest three hours, you'll enjoy it. I marvel at the detailing in each frame every time I see it. #AnuragBasu made this movie with immense love, passion and imagination. An adventure, detective musical with dollops of romance. Now that is a unique "space" which no one has explored in Bollywood at least. And it goes without saying that #RanbirKapoor is outstanding. He didn't miss a beat. I've attached the most beautifully poignant scene from the movie. How well Ranbir has emoted. There's no one who can portray poignancy better than him on screen. Kudos to Ranbir and Basu for backing this audacious film. I'm sure it'll get its due over a period of time. VIDEO Credit - Siddharth Roy Kapur and Ranbir Kapoor

Navneet Mundhra

27,467 views • 6 months ago

John Carpenter on being called "P0rn0grapher of violence" by the critics & how the movie industry turned against him because of "The Thing" (1982): "Two weeks before 'The Thing' (1982) comes out, they released this other movie called 'E.T' (1982) & there's the burst of love all around this movie. I guess the country was going through a recession & there were tough times. Audiences wanted an up/cry & 'E.T' gave it to them. Two weeks later, out comes my movie, 'The Thing' (1982). And my movie is exactly just the opposite of E.T. It is not an up cry. It is a downer. It is the grimmest thing you have ever seen. There's a transformation scene where the dogs suddenly turn into this horrible creature, and during the first preview one audience member jumped up and ran into the bathroom and threw up. The executives thought we had a hit. Unfortunately, they were wrong. I was criticized heavily for the gore. The critics called me a p0rn0grapher of violence. I've been called a lot of names before but I got called the most names on that film. Here I thought I had made this really great movie, right? But even during the preview stage I knew something was wrong because I had this sixteen-year-old ask me what happened at the end—which one of them was The Thing? I told her she had to use her imagination. She told me she hated that. So I realized I was in deep trouble with that film. And I was right. The industry turned against me because they thought I had gone too far with the gore. I think it probably changed my career." ("The Directors take one", Robert J. Emery, 2002)

John Carpenter on being called "P0rn0grapher of violence" by the critics & how the movie industry turned against him because of "The Thing" (1982): "Two weeks before 'The Thing' (1982) comes out, they released this other movie called 'E.T' (1982) & there's the burst of love all around this movie. I guess the country was going through a recession & there were tough times. Audiences wanted an up/cry & 'E.T' gave it to them. Two weeks later, out comes my movie, 'The Thing' (1982). And my movie is exactly just the opposite of E.T. It is not an up cry. It is a downer. It is the grimmest thing you have ever seen. There's a transformation scene where the dogs suddenly turn into this horrible creature, and during the first preview one audience member jumped up and ran into the bathroom and threw up. The executives thought we had a hit. Unfortunately, they were wrong. I was criticized heavily for the gore. The critics called me a p0rn0grapher of violence. I've been called a lot of names before but I got called the most names on that film. Here I thought I had made this really great movie, right? But even during the preview stage I knew something was wrong because I had this sixteen-year-old ask me what happened at the end—which one of them was The Thing? I told her she had to use her imagination. She told me she hated that. So I realized I was in deep trouble with that film. And I was right. The industry turned against me because they thought I had gone too far with the gore. I think it probably changed my career." ("The Directors take one", Robert J. Emery, 2002)

DepressedBergman

178,231 views • 3 months ago

Robert Rodriguez on the reason why 'The Faculty' (1998) didn't perform as well as it could have in the box office & it's cult status: "Rodriguez: Making 'The Faculty' (1998) was just a blast. There was so much young energy and the actors were just so into it. I will say, I was worried it wouldn’t do well though. I wanted them to use a different title because our target audience wasn’t gonna want to see a movie about teachers. So I fought for a better title. Interviewer: Did you have some title ideas in your head? Rodriguez: I did. There was 'Alienated', but my favorite idea was The Others. And the studio was like, “No no, let’s just go with The Faculty.” Then two years later that same studio released a movie titled 'The Others' (2001) with Nicole Kidman. But I came up with that name for 'The Faculty'. I mean, it’s possible that its script already had that title, but yeah, I wanted that title for my movie. I think 'The Faculty' didn’t perform as well as it could have because of the title. I remember growing up there was a movie with Nick Nolte called 'Teachers' (1984). And I remember being like … what kid wants to see a movie about teachers? That’s what I was worried about with my movie, that we weren’t going to attract a younger audience because of the title. They even had to shoot extra footage of the faculty doing stuff like closing windows and locking doors for the trailer, which just strengthened the idea of teachers being the bad guys. So yeah, I think they didn’t know how to sell it, which is why I think so many people discovered it later and are now coming out and being like, “Hey, this movie is pretty good!”" ("Robert Rodriguez on Hypnotic and the 25th anniversary of his cult hit The Faculty", Keith Langston, digital trends, 2023) P.S: Happy 58th birthday, Robert Rodriguez!

Robert Rodriguez on the reason why 'The Faculty' (1998) didn't perform as well as it could have in the box office & it's cult status: "Rodriguez: Making 'The Faculty' (1998) was just a blast. There was so much young energy and the actors were just so into it. I will say, I was worried it wouldn’t do well though. I wanted them to use a different title because our target audience wasn’t gonna want to see a movie about teachers. So I fought for a better title. Interviewer: Did you have some title ideas in your head? Rodriguez: I did. There was 'Alienated', but my favorite idea was The Others. And the studio was like, “No no, let’s just go with The Faculty.” Then two years later that same studio released a movie titled 'The Others' (2001) with Nicole Kidman. But I came up with that name for 'The Faculty'. I mean, it’s possible that its script already had that title, but yeah, I wanted that title for my movie. I think 'The Faculty' didn’t perform as well as it could have because of the title. I remember growing up there was a movie with Nick Nolte called 'Teachers' (1984). And I remember being like … what kid wants to see a movie about teachers? That’s what I was worried about with my movie, that we weren’t going to attract a younger audience because of the title. They even had to shoot extra footage of the faculty doing stuff like closing windows and locking doors for the trailer, which just strengthened the idea of teachers being the bad guys. So yeah, I think they didn’t know how to sell it, which is why I think so many people discovered it later and are now coming out and being like, “Hey, this movie is pretty good!”" ("Robert Rodriguez on Hypnotic and the 25th anniversary of his cult hit The Faculty", Keith Langston, digital trends, 2023) P.S: Happy 58th birthday, Robert Rodriguez!

DepressedBergman

83,466 views • 2 months ago

Everyone in China is talking about this movie: Once Upon a Time in the Middle East, a China-made movie about the US and UK's invasion of Iraq. Hollywood won't be able to make this! 😭I watched it yesterday, cried hard in the cinema, and was deeply touched ... The movie shows the devastating impact of wars on a country, on ordinary people, especially on children, and how extremists were created. It also shows China's attitude towards world peace. I encourage you to watch it too! ⚠️Spoiler alert: The movie follows the Chinese chef Xu Fu, who went to run a Chinese restaurant in a country in West Asia. At first, he was purely driven by money, but as wars broke out and the country was torn apart, he and his friends were dragged into the chaos and forced to cook for different forces. He saw how the US bombed and destroyed a country, how some US soldiers at the front line treated local people as nonhuman, and how some other US soldiers were just ignorant kids that wants to go home; He saw how war orphans in the country were used and trained to be suicide bombers by terrorists, how foreign invaders deprived everything local people had and left them no choice but to join terror groups to revenge. But throughout the movie, Xu Fu keeps telling everyone 好好吃饭(eat properly). He tried his best to provide decent food for children in the war zone, even if it meant risking his own life. The story was inspired by true stories of Chinese people who worked in Iraq, but instead of one person, it was based on several people’s stories. 💡My thoughts on governance: You probably know how much Chinese people love food and value food. From a country that constantly suffered famine and wars, to a country with abundant food for 1.4 billion people, China made a lot of effort. And I think it’s a philosophy that any political power should focus on: how to feed its people, and let them 好好吃饭 (eat properly).

Everyone in China is talking about this movie: Once Upon a Time in the Middle East, a China-made movie about the US and UK's invasion of Iraq. Hollywood won't be able to make this! 😭I watched it yesterday, cried hard in the cinema, and was deeply touched ... The movie shows the devastating impact of wars on a country, on ordinary people, especially on children, and how extremists were created. It also shows China's attitude towards world peace. I encourage you to watch it too! ⚠️Spoiler alert: The movie follows the Chinese chef Xu Fu, who went to run a Chinese restaurant in a country in West Asia. At first, he was purely driven by money, but as wars broke out and the country was torn apart, he and his friends were dragged into the chaos and forced to cook for different forces. He saw how the US bombed and destroyed a country, how some US soldiers at the front line treated local people as nonhuman, and how some other US soldiers were just ignorant kids that wants to go home; He saw how war orphans in the country were used and trained to be suicide bombers by terrorists, how foreign invaders deprived everything local people had and left them no choice but to join terror groups to revenge. But throughout the movie, Xu Fu keeps telling everyone 好好吃饭(eat properly). He tried his best to provide decent food for children in the war zone, even if it meant risking his own life. The story was inspired by true stories of Chinese people who worked in Iraq, but instead of one person, it was based on several people’s stories. 💡My thoughts on governance: You probably know how much Chinese people love food and value food. From a country that constantly suffered famine and wars, to a country with abundant food for 1.4 billion people, China made a lot of effort. And I think it’s a philosophy that any political power should focus on: how to feed its people, and let them 好好吃饭 (eat properly).

Li Jingjing 李菁菁

53,123 views • 3 days ago

Share your story of how you discovered FreenBecky. Here's mine: One evening in 2023, I was scrolling through TikTok when I came across this clip "The scene of them in the pool" that immediately caught my attention. I got curious and asked, "What movie is this? I'd love to watch it. What's the name?" That question led me to GAP. I ended up watching every single episode that same day. I started around 7 p.m. and didn't stop until after midnight. After each episode, I kept telling myself, "I'll continue tomorrow," but I just couldn't stop. 😂 I had to know what happened next. When I finally finished the series that night, I wanted more. So I started searching for Freen and Becky, learned more about them, and followed their journey. And here I am, still supporting FreenBecky today. 🤭💙 #FreenBecky‌ #srchafreen‌ #beckysangels‌

Share your story of how you discovered FreenBecky. Here's mine: One evening in 2023, I was scrolling through TikTok when I came across this clip "The scene of them in the pool" that immediately caught my attention. I got curious and asked, "What movie is this? I'd love to watch it. What's the name?" That question led me to GAP. I ended up watching every single episode that same day. I started around 7 p.m. and didn't stop until after midnight. After each episode, I kept telling myself, "I'll continue tomorrow," but I just couldn't stop. 😂 I had to know what happened next. When I finally finished the series that night, I wanted more. So I started searching for Freen and Becky, learned more about them, and followed their journey. And here I am, still supporting FreenBecky today. 🤭💙 #FreenBecky‌ #srchafreen‌ #beckysangels‌

P'Brenda(real)🌷🧚 🇳🇬

22,365 views • 1 month ago

Uranus2324 Movie and Character relationship analysis 🪐🤿 [Note:] I’ll be using the extended version in my analysis for a few reasons. I’ve seen some people say that version felt too “fanservice-y,” which is apparently why they changed it, but I don’t agree. The extended cut includes extra scenes with Lin and her dad that I think are important, plus a few others that actually made this (admittedly confusing at times) movie make a lot more sense to me. So if you find yourself thinking, “Wait, I didn’t see that when I watched it,” you’re probably watching the unextended version. Uranus2324 is a movie loved by many FB fans, but it also sits on that shelf of “I’ll watch it once and probably not again” for a lot of people. With this analysis, I hope you come away with a better understanding of the film. If you’ve seen it before and didn’t quite get it, I really invite you to rewatch it through this lens. This movie admittedly has some editing choices that make it confusing at times. But after sitting down and watching it about five times now, I think I’ve finally figured out which universe is which and who’s who. I’ll explain that part in the solo character breakdowns I’ll be doing at the start. I’ll also be focusing on Kath and Lin’s relationship, but not on intimacy, since the love scene(s?) were cut from the final version. And I’m sorry, but if it’s not in the extended version, I won’t be including it in the analysis. HOWEVER, there is a scene in the WWII universe that’s extremely intimate without a single word of dialogue, and that’s one I’ll be digging into later. I’ll then finally finish on why I think Uranus2324 is a happy/bittersweet ending to ME. #freenbecky #uranus2324 #srchafreen #Beckysangels

Uranus2324 Movie and Character relationship analysis 🪐🤿 [Note:] I’ll be using the extended version in my analysis for a few reasons. I’ve seen some people say that version felt too “fanservice-y,” which is apparently why they changed it, but I don’t agree. The extended cut includes extra scenes with Lin and her dad that I think are important, plus a few others that actually made this (admittedly confusing at times) movie make a lot more sense to me. So if you find yourself thinking, “Wait, I didn’t see that when I watched it,” you’re probably watching the unextended version. Uranus2324 is a movie loved by many FB fans, but it also sits on that shelf of “I’ll watch it once and probably not again” for a lot of people. With this analysis, I hope you come away with a better understanding of the film. If you’ve seen it before and didn’t quite get it, I really invite you to rewatch it through this lens. This movie admittedly has some editing choices that make it confusing at times. But after sitting down and watching it about five times now, I think I’ve finally figured out which universe is which and who’s who. I’ll explain that part in the solo character breakdowns I’ll be doing at the start. I’ll also be focusing on Kath and Lin’s relationship, but not on intimacy, since the love scene(s?) were cut from the final version. And I’m sorry, but if it’s not in the extended version, I won’t be including it in the analysis. HOWEVER, there is a scene in the WWII universe that’s extremely intimate without a single word of dialogue, and that’s one I’ll be digging into later. I’ll then finally finish on why I think Uranus2324 is a happy/bittersweet ending to ME. #freenbecky #uranus2324 #srchafreen #Beckysangels

juno🥑

17,668 views • 9 months ago

Steven Spielberg saw Stanley Kubrick for the first time in 1980 while he was building sets for "The Shining" (1980). After the movie was released, Spielberg went to Kubrick's house for dinner. Kubrick asked him if he liked the movie. Spielberg, who didn't like the movie in the first viewing, started to tell Kubrick all the things he liked about the movie, rather than telling that he didn't like the movie. Kubrick saw right through him and said, "Steven, you obviously didn't like my picture very much". Spielberg replied, "There is a lot of things that I like about the picture". Kubrick stopped him and said, "But there is a lot of things you didn't love about the picture, probably a lot more that you didn't than did. So tell me what you didn't like about it." Spielberg pinpointed Jack Nicholson's performance. He called him a "great actor" and a "great performance", but a "Great Kabuki Performance", almost like Kabuki theater. Kubrick then asked, "You mean you think Jack went over the top?". Spielberg replied affirmatively. Kubrick then asked Spielberg to name his top 5 favourite actors of all time without thinking much. Spielberg listed Spencer Tracy, Henry Fonda, James Stewart, Cary Grant and Clark Gable. Kubrick said, "Stop" & questioned, "Where was James Cagney on that list?" Spielberg said that he is up there high, Kubrick then said, "But not in the top 5". Finally Kubrick said," You don't consider James Cagney as one of the 5 best actors around, but I do. This is why Jack Nicholson's performance is a great one." Since then, Spielberg has caw "The Shining" more than 25 times & considers it one of his favourite pictures. P.S: Remembering the legendary American actor James Cagney on his 127th birthday! Clip from: One, Two, Three (1961) Director: Billy Wilder

Steven Spielberg saw Stanley Kubrick for the first time in 1980 while he was building sets for "The Shining" (1980). After the movie was released, Spielberg went to Kubrick's house for dinner. Kubrick asked him if he liked the movie. Spielberg, who didn't like the movie in the first viewing, started to tell Kubrick all the things he liked about the movie, rather than telling that he didn't like the movie. Kubrick saw right through him and said, "Steven, you obviously didn't like my picture very much". Spielberg replied, "There is a lot of things that I like about the picture". Kubrick stopped him and said, "But there is a lot of things you didn't love about the picture, probably a lot more that you didn't than did. So tell me what you didn't like about it." Spielberg pinpointed Jack Nicholson's performance. He called him a "great actor" and a "great performance", but a "Great Kabuki Performance", almost like Kabuki theater. Kubrick then asked, "You mean you think Jack went over the top?". Spielberg replied affirmatively. Kubrick then asked Spielberg to name his top 5 favourite actors of all time without thinking much. Spielberg listed Spencer Tracy, Henry Fonda, James Stewart, Cary Grant and Clark Gable. Kubrick said, "Stop" & questioned, "Where was James Cagney on that list?" Spielberg said that he is up there high, Kubrick then said, "But not in the top 5". Finally Kubrick said," You don't consider James Cagney as one of the 5 best actors around, but I do. This is why Jack Nicholson's performance is a great one." Since then, Spielberg has caw "The Shining" more than 25 times & considers it one of his favourite pictures. P.S: Remembering the legendary American actor James Cagney on his 127th birthday! Clip from: One, Two, Three (1961) Director: Billy Wilder

DepressedBergman

396,766 views • 1 month ago

"The Gosling character is undoubtedly a Christ-figure" in Project Hail Mary. —Bishop Barron. Sorry. No. And this is important. (Spoilers, ...hence the spacing...) The exact opposite is true. Jesus willingly laid down his life to save us. That's the whole essence of His Sacrifice. "No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord." (John 10:18) Gosling’s character absolutely refused to go on the mission, and only wound up on the ship because he was forcibly restrained, injected with a tranquilizer, put in a coma, and strapped into the ship. He wasn’t willing to die, and as it turns out, he also didn’t die. He gets to enjoy life with the aliens on their planet at the end. At one point in the movie, Gosling’s character, Ryland Grace, says he “made peace” with being stuck on this seeming suicide-mission-ship called “Project Hail Mary.” But he takes it back moments later and says “I didn’t mean any of that.” I can see how many would find this movie entertaining. (Not my style; constant giddy/effeminate dialogue ain't my cup of tea.) But nothing about this movie was a Christ story. To take the bait (i.e., the movie’s title and main character’s name) and pretend it is a Christ story is not evangelization, it’s Gospel-cheapening. There is one and only one mention of God in the entire movie, when the main female character says she believes in God because it’s “better than the alternative.” And that woman ultimately winds up being the rather cruel character who is the one ordering Gosling to be held down, put into a coma, and forced into an apparent suicide mission. Even the film’s funeral scene aboard the ship, which even the most secular of movies will almost always invite God and prayer into, is completely Godless. Not even the slightest allusion to God, prayer, Scripture, or anything similar, takes place. It remains a purely atheistic “celebration of life” – true microcosm of the whole movie, wherein the only “saviors” are “evolution, science, and friendly alien/human/AI cooperation.” (Grace doesn't just befriend the alien—the only thing he seems willing to die for—he even befriends the AI robot, giving it a loving noogie at the end.) Also, the “conservatives” raving about this movie by calling it “anti-woke” are grasping at straws. Sure, it was less in-your-face woke than many modern movies. But it was woke, alright ⤵️ (There's also a recurring degenerate reference, played as humorous, that I won't list here). There might not be a lot of scenes like these ⤵️ in the film... but there's NO scenes opposed to them (nothing remotely "anti-woke" anywhere in it).

"The Gosling character is undoubtedly a Christ-figure" in Project Hail Mary. —Bishop Barron. Sorry. No. And this is important. (Spoilers, ...hence the spacing...) The exact opposite is true. Jesus willingly laid down his life to save us. That's the whole essence of His Sacrifice. "No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord." (John 10:18) Gosling’s character absolutely refused to go on the mission, and only wound up on the ship because he was forcibly restrained, injected with a tranquilizer, put in a coma, and strapped into the ship. He wasn’t willing to die, and as it turns out, he also didn’t die. He gets to enjoy life with the aliens on their planet at the end. At one point in the movie, Gosling’s character, Ryland Grace, says he “made peace” with being stuck on this seeming suicide-mission-ship called “Project Hail Mary.” But he takes it back moments later and says “I didn’t mean any of that.” I can see how many would find this movie entertaining. (Not my style; constant giddy/effeminate dialogue ain't my cup of tea.) But nothing about this movie was a Christ story. To take the bait (i.e., the movie’s title and main character’s name) and pretend it is a Christ story is not evangelization, it’s Gospel-cheapening. There is one and only one mention of God in the entire movie, when the main female character says she believes in God because it’s “better than the alternative.” And that woman ultimately winds up being the rather cruel character who is the one ordering Gosling to be held down, put into a coma, and forced into an apparent suicide mission. Even the film’s funeral scene aboard the ship, which even the most secular of movies will almost always invite God and prayer into, is completely Godless. Not even the slightest allusion to God, prayer, Scripture, or anything similar, takes place. It remains a purely atheistic “celebration of life” – true microcosm of the whole movie, wherein the only “saviors” are “evolution, science, and friendly alien/human/AI cooperation.” (Grace doesn't just befriend the alien—the only thing he seems willing to die for—he even befriends the AI robot, giving it a loving noogie at the end.) Also, the “conservatives” raving about this movie by calling it “anti-woke” are grasping at straws. Sure, it was less in-your-face woke than many modern movies. But it was woke, alright ⤵️ (There's also a recurring degenerate reference, played as humorous, that I won't list here). There might not be a lot of scenes like these ⤵️ in the film... but there's NO scenes opposed to them (nothing remotely "anti-woke" anywhere in it).

Daniel O'Connor

31,745 views • 3 months ago