Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

“How long is too long?” Well, a Supreme Court bench thinks 5.5 years is NOT long enough for freeing one on bail, in the case of #UmarKhalid. In conversation with Arfa Khanum Sherwani:

SauravDassss's profile picture

Saurav Das

101,284 subscribers

47,155 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование#UmarKhalid
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

#Interview | The Bengal Files: India Rejects a Dangerous Campaign of Anti-Muslim Hatred Arfa Khanum Sherwani in conversation with Ziya Us Salam and Aparna Watch Now:
1:09

#Interview | The Bengal Files: India Rejects a Dangerous Campaign of Anti-Muslim Hatred Arfa Khanum Sherwani in conversation with Ziya Us Salam and Aparna Watch Now:

The Wire

11,805 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

The hospitality of Kashmir is unmatchable. The spirit with which kashmiris are serving the stranded tourists amid sudden snowfall is beyond words. Public from other states should learn how to serve guests. Long live #Kashmir Aditya Menon Arfa Khanum Sherwani Waheed Ur Rehman Para Iltija Mufti
0:37

The hospitality of Kashmir is unmatchable. The spirit with which kashmiris are serving the stranded tourists amid sudden snowfall is beyond words. Public from other states should learn how to serve guests. Long live #Kashmir Aditya Menon Arfa Khanum Sherwani Waheed Ur Rehman Para Iltija Mufti

Guftar Ahmed

41,894 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BIG DECISION by Supreme Court In terror & UAPA cases, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY is NOT ABSOLUTE. “Bail not jail” CANNOT be the sole basis for BAIL. Even long incarceration alone doesn’t justify BAIL when CRIMES threaten India’s SOVEREIGNTY, INTEGRITY & NATIONAL SECURITY.
0:47

🚨 BIG DECISION by Supreme Court In terror & UAPA cases, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY is NOT ABSOLUTE. “Bail not jail” CANNOT be the sole basis for BAIL. Even long incarceration alone doesn’t justify BAIL when CRIMES threaten India’s SOVEREIGNTY, INTEGRITY & NATIONAL SECURITY.

Megh Updates 🚨™

107,819 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Here’s the scary part about Amy Coney Barrett, she’s young for a Supreme Court Justice. She’s going to be around for a long time. This is one of the worst Supreme Court picks by any Republican in history.
0:20

Here’s the scary part about Amy Coney Barrett, she’s young for a Supreme Court Justice. She’s going to be around for a long time. This is one of the worst Supreme Court picks by any Republican in history.

Derrick Evans

218,245 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.
3:34

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,478 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Supreme Court Justice B V Nagarathna Slams Government for Causing Court Backlogs. Probably One of the Best Supreme Court Justice on the Bench Today. She'll be India's First Woman Chief Justice, but only for a few weeks. I wish she had a long tenure..
1:01

Supreme Court Justice B V Nagarathna Slams Government for Causing Court Backlogs. Probably One of the Best Supreme Court Justice on the Bench Today. She'll be India's First Woman Chief Justice, but only for a few weeks. I wish she had a long tenure..

Dr Ranjan

19,467 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"Do those who lynch Muslims for not chanting 'Jai Shree Ram' represent all Hindus?" Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi on extremism and the dangerous generalisation of entire communities, in conversation with Arfa Khanum Sherwani for The Wire 📺 Watch the full interview:
1:38

"Do those who lynch Muslims for not chanting 'Jai Shree Ram' represent all Hindus?" Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi on extremism and the dangerous generalisation of entire communities, in conversation with Arfa Khanum Sherwani for The Wire 📺 Watch the full interview:

Office of Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi

64,864 просмотров • 1 год назад

"PM Modi is the most unpopular PM in the history of India" Bibi Arfa Khanum Sherwani tumhari credibility hai?? 😂🤣
0:50

"PM Modi is the most unpopular PM in the history of India" Bibi Arfa Khanum Sherwani tumhari credibility hai?? 😂🤣

BALA

266,332 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Had a very detailed discussion with Arfa Khanum Sherwani on lots of issues connected with #IndianMuslims! I am not at all the leader of the community by any yardstick! Listen 👂 in the full Thanks Arfa for giving me this opportunity to speak
2:57

Had a very detailed discussion with Arfa Khanum Sherwani on lots of issues connected with #IndianMuslims! I am not at all the leader of the community by any yardstick! Listen 👂 in the full Thanks Arfa for giving me this opportunity to speak

zafar sareshwala 🇮🇳

329,238 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Seven years is too long. Not one more day. #FreeGulshanAbbas
2:46

Seven years is too long. Not one more day. #FreeGulshanAbbas

Rushan Abbas

331,991 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

"Democracy is not properly functioning in Bharat. People look up to the UN for solutions" So this traitor was in UN. Funny how Islamist Arfa Khanum Sherwani cries for Democracy in India while backing Sharia supporter Zohran Mandani in New York.
0:38

"Democracy is not properly functioning in Bharat. People look up to the UN for solutions" So this traitor was in UN. Funny how Islamist Arfa Khanum Sherwani cries for Democracy in India while backing Sharia supporter Zohran Mandani in New York.

BALA

21,025 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

#WATCH | On AAP leader Satyendar Jain, Union HM Amit Shah says, "He did not get bail for four years. The case is still going on. The closure report was not filed in the FIR, in which he was in jail for four years. The closure report was filed in the 2022 case. In the four cases in which he went to jail and for a long time, CBI has charge sheeted him in all four cases and he is facing trial. Satyendar Jain ji has been chargesheeted in all the cases in which he had to stay in jail for a long time and he is facing trial."
1:00

#WATCH | On AAP leader Satyendar Jain, Union HM Amit Shah says, "He did not get bail for four years. The case is still going on. The closure report was not filed in the FIR, in which he was in jail for four years. The closure report was filed in the 2022 case. In the four cases in which he went to jail and for a long time, CBI has charge sheeted him in all four cases and he is facing trial. Satyendar Jain ji has been chargesheeted in all the cases in which he had to stay in jail for a long time and he is facing trial."

ANI

153,079 просмотров • 1 год назад

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia speaks up on bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. "I am disappointed with the judgement (bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam). Supreme Court has misinterpreted K.A. Najeeb's case. In the K.A. Najeeb case, Supreme Court granted him bail considering that there are over 200 witnesses and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future. So, the possibility of completion of trial has to be considered along with the period of incarceration. In this case, there are 900 witnesses. But this part has not been touched upon by the Supreme Court."
2:12

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia speaks up on bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. "I am disappointed with the judgement (bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam). Supreme Court has misinterpreted K.A. Najeeb's case. In the K.A. Najeeb case, Supreme Court granted him bail considering that there are over 200 witnesses and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future. So, the possibility of completion of trial has to be considered along with the period of incarceration. In this case, there are 900 witnesses. But this part has not been touched upon by the Supreme Court."

Kaushik Raj

104,707 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Corruption is the problem. Transparency is the cure. In South Carolina, lawyer-legislators are hand-picking the very judges they appear before in court. That is not justice. That is a conflict of interest, and it has gone on long enough. Not on my watch.
0:51

Corruption is the problem. Transparency is the cure. In South Carolina, lawyer-legislators are hand-picking the very judges they appear before in court. That is not justice. That is a conflict of interest, and it has gone on long enough. Not on my watch.

Nancy Mace

12,380 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Bail not jail principle junked? Additional Solicitor General of India Satya Pal Jain defends Delhi HC order denying bail to #UmarKhalid and Sharjeel Imam. Senior SC advocate SANJAY HEGDE counters him, says what the court has done is to turn a Nelson's eye to the long period of incarceration. #NewsToday | Rajdeep Sardesai
5:04

Bail not jail principle junked? Additional Solicitor General of India Satya Pal Jain defends Delhi HC order denying bail to #UmarKhalid and Sharjeel Imam. Senior SC advocate SANJAY HEGDE counters him, says what the court has done is to turn a Nelson's eye to the long period of incarceration. #NewsToday | Rajdeep Sardesai

IndiaToday

21,828 просмотров • 1 год назад