Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

HOW Pep Has Platformed Rayan Cherki Tactically… Through constant rotations, Pep engineers superiority: • Bernardo or Nunes holding width • Reijnders occupying the right half-space to release Cherki wide • Or Cherki inverting into the half-space as the main distributor While Foden and Silva can feed between the lines,...

pythaginboots's profile picture

Pythagoras In Boots ⚽️

84,934 subscribers

29,594 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsSports
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Most people don’t understand Phil Foden. Phil Foden is a tempo dependent profile. He needs constant touches, quick 1-2s and early access to activate his game. So he keeps dropping into the first phase showing between lines asking for the ball off the 6/8s and even the CBs. The issue is not availability. It’s access. England simply do not have the level of passer required. Anderson, Rice, Mainoo and Henderson are nowhere near the level of consistently breaking lines with the right weight, timing and conviction. At City he is fed by Rodri and Bernardo. Players who trust the angle, play through pressure and sustain a IP 3-2-5 with control. With England, that connection is not there. So instead of receiving on the half turn in the right half space, he’s recycling or arriving late. The attack loses central progression and defaults to low value wide crosses. Put Foden in a possession structure with elite interior passers and you get a completely different player. This is not about form. It’s about ecosystem.
0:48

Most people don’t understand Phil Foden. Phil Foden is a tempo dependent profile. He needs constant touches, quick 1-2s and early access to activate his game. So he keeps dropping into the first phase showing between lines asking for the ball off the 6/8s and even the CBs. The issue is not availability. It’s access. England simply do not have the level of passer required. Anderson, Rice, Mainoo and Henderson are nowhere near the level of consistently breaking lines with the right weight, timing and conviction. At City he is fed by Rodri and Bernardo. Players who trust the angle, play through pressure and sustain a IP 3-2-5 with control. With England, that connection is not there. So instead of receiving on the half turn in the right half space, he’s recycling or arriving late. The attack loses central progression and defaults to low value wide crosses. Put Foden in a possession structure with elite interior passers and you get a completely different player. This is not about form. It’s about ecosystem.

A.

194,933 views • 3 months ago

🚨Pep Guardiola on if Rayan Cherki is allowed to showboat against Chelsea: 🗣️Pep: "Listen... Rayan is a special, special player.He is little bit of a free soul. I am a manager who likes control, we know this. So sometimes, on the touchline, it is so, so tough to watch. My heart... pff. He gets the ball, he starts the tricks, and my instinct is to shout, 'Rayan, please, play simple!' But if I tell him against Chelsea, 'Stop this,' I destroy the player. I take away his incredible quality. What he did against Arsenal, against Liverpool… exceptional. Unbelievable..” “So against Chelsea, I want to see it again. If he feels it, he does it. Go out, express yourself, have fun, and show the world how good you are. We will respect the opponent but at the same time, I don’t want to take away what makes Rayan special. He's one of the most unbelievably talented players I've EVER seen.” #CHEMCI
0:27

🚨Pep Guardiola on if Rayan Cherki is allowed to showboat against Chelsea: 🗣️Pep: "Listen... Rayan is a special, special player.He is little bit of a free soul. I am a manager who likes control, we know this. So sometimes, on the touchline, it is so, so tough to watch. My heart... pff. He gets the ball, he starts the tricks, and my instinct is to shout, 'Rayan, please, play simple!' But if I tell him against Chelsea, 'Stop this,' I destroy the player. I take away his incredible quality. What he did against Arsenal, against Liverpool… exceptional. Unbelievable..” “So against Chelsea, I want to see it again. If he feels it, he does it. Go out, express yourself, have fun, and show the world how good you are. We will respect the opponent but at the same time, I don’t want to take away what makes Rayan special. He's one of the most unbelievably talented players I've EVER seen.” #CHEMCI

Klay

1,516,078 views • 3 months ago

It means more. It always means more when you beat the most physical, athletic, transitional side in the league. Doing it at St James’ Park hits different. Top performances all over the pitch: Semenyo, Cherki when he came on, O’Reilly holding it down at DM until Rodri came on for control/calming the tempo, the Alleyne–Khusanov partnership, Nunes, and Bernardo with that sublime touch to tee up Semenyo. Trafford between the sticks as well. This has to be fuel going into the derby. A massive win in the first leg, now bring on the second. Come on, Citeh.
1:54

It means more. It always means more when you beat the most physical, athletic, transitional side in the league. Doing it at St James’ Park hits different. Top performances all over the pitch: Semenyo, Cherki when he came on, O’Reilly holding it down at DM until Rodri came on for control/calming the tempo, the Alleyne–Khusanov partnership, Nunes, and Bernardo with that sublime touch to tee up Semenyo. Trafford between the sticks as well. This has to be fuel going into the derby. A massive win in the first leg, now bring on the second. Come on, Citeh.

Geronimo Morgans

148,720 views • 6 months ago

🇫🇷 Karl Toko Ekambi, former Lyon player on Rayan Cherki : “When I was in Lyon four years ago, he could’ve had the exact same season he’s having now. But football depends on a lot of different factors — the environment around you, how the coach treats you, whether the club really understands you. And I think Lyon finally managed to get that right. Cherki is a kid who doesn’t cause problems. He’s a hard worker — people don’t always realize it, but he puts in a lot of work off the pitch. Sure, he has his own personality, his own style, but he’s respectful, he doesn’t act like a star. This was his year, but it’s a bit frustrating because he could’ve done this four years ago if the right structure had been in place. It’s not his fault — he just needed proper support”
0:54

🇫🇷 Karl Toko Ekambi, former Lyon player on Rayan Cherki : “When I was in Lyon four years ago, he could’ve had the exact same season he’s having now. But football depends on a lot of different factors — the environment around you, how the coach treats you, whether the club really understands you. And I think Lyon finally managed to get that right. Cherki is a kid who doesn’t cause problems. He’s a hard worker — people don’t always realize it, but he puts in a lot of work off the pitch. Sure, he has his own personality, his own style, but he’s respectful, he doesn’t act like a star. This was his year, but it’s a bit frustrating because he could’ve done this four years ago if the right structure had been in place. It’s not his fault — he just needed proper support”

Ous

198,205 views • 1 year ago

I’d break the Zlatan issue for many people including yourself. Narratives have traveled and I’ve come to conclude that many of you don’t even know what happened with Zlatan at Barcelona. Zlatan’s major issue was with Pep, he had no single issue with Messi, none. Till date, he maintains that beef with Pep. On Piers Morgan, Zlatan said the mistake he did when he got to Barcelona was trying to fit in. He got off a wrong start with Pep because he drove a Ferrari to training. In his words, he said Pep told him that, in this place, players don’t drive a Ferrari. Zlatan said he didn’t drive his car for 7-8 months just to please Pep and try to fit in, which was his biggest regret. Zlatan said he wasn’t performing and went to see Pep in his office. Firstly he went to meet the higher people up there in the hierarchy, but they told him that they can’t interfere and he should speak to Pep himself. He went to meet Pep and told him that the new formation does not favor him. By the way, this is absolutely normal. I have attacked a video to Salah talking with Slot. In fact, you could hear Salah towards the end of that video say he was going to speak to Slot so they could change formations. This is normal in professional football. Players speak to their coaches, especially the big players. Zlatan said the formation does not give him more freedom and it won’t get the best out of him. It’s best he does not play because he’s not performing, Pep is also egoistic, he benched Zlatan for 4 games in a row after that meeting. Zlatan said he created fire afterwards, he started bringing his Ferrari to training and parking it in front of Pep’s office 😭. He said when he went to Manchester United, Pep was at City and Pep will never look him in the eye. I have been able to establish that Zlatan’s problem at Barcelona was Pep, he said it himself and this is the link. I don’t do GOAL, I do facts. ( How does Messi come into this? Zlatan, in his book, said Messi spoke to Pep about switching formations, this formation switch is what affected him. He was playing better in the previous formation, and scoring. This new formation meant he had no freedom and that’s what he said on Piers Morgan, he went to see Pep. This thing Zlatan said is what you guys have been running with. You & I are not privy to the conversation Messi had with Pep. Both parties have never addressed this before to give their side of the story, if they have, you can share me a link of them saying it just like I shared you that link (not screenshots from GOAL please, be serious for once). If any of their mates have addressed this before, please share too. Again, Zlatan’s issue at Barcelona was with Pep right from day 1 of driving a Ferrari, this has nothing to do with Messi. Let’s assume Messi spoke to Pep on changing formation, and Pep agreed, it’s on Pep and he’s the manager. Messi speaking to his manager is normal, just like Zlatan going to speak with Pep. If you listen to the video I attached of Salah, he clearly mentions he spoke to Slot on not defending, and he will still speak to Slot for them to adapt their formation because oppositions are finding out. Players are in constant communication with their managers. Whatever they spoke about, Pep is the manager not Messi. Easy with your bragging too, telling me you don’t just write and no one should dare you to bring evidences. After spending hours in your research, you even slept overnight, and the source you could reference is “Goal”😭 Listen to Zlatan talk about why he loves Messi so much, this was few days ago by the way Another Stop creating issues where there’s none.
1:18

I’d break the Zlatan issue for many people including yourself. Narratives have traveled and I’ve come to conclude that many of you don’t even know what happened with Zlatan at Barcelona. Zlatan’s major issue was with Pep, he had no single issue with Messi, none. Till date, he maintains that beef with Pep. On Piers Morgan, Zlatan said the mistake he did when he got to Barcelona was trying to fit in. He got off a wrong start with Pep because he drove a Ferrari to training. In his words, he said Pep told him that, in this place, players don’t drive a Ferrari. Zlatan said he didn’t drive his car for 7-8 months just to please Pep and try to fit in, which was his biggest regret. Zlatan said he wasn’t performing and went to see Pep in his office. Firstly he went to meet the higher people up there in the hierarchy, but they told him that they can’t interfere and he should speak to Pep himself. He went to meet Pep and told him that the new formation does not favor him. By the way, this is absolutely normal. I have attacked a video to Salah talking with Slot. In fact, you could hear Salah towards the end of that video say he was going to speak to Slot so they could change formations. This is normal in professional football. Players speak to their coaches, especially the big players. Zlatan said the formation does not give him more freedom and it won’t get the best out of him. It’s best he does not play because he’s not performing, Pep is also egoistic, he benched Zlatan for 4 games in a row after that meeting. Zlatan said he created fire afterwards, he started bringing his Ferrari to training and parking it in front of Pep’s office 😭. He said when he went to Manchester United, Pep was at City and Pep will never look him in the eye. I have been able to establish that Zlatan’s problem at Barcelona was Pep, he said it himself and this is the link. I don’t do GOAL, I do facts. ( How does Messi come into this? Zlatan, in his book, said Messi spoke to Pep about switching formations, this formation switch is what affected him. He was playing better in the previous formation, and scoring. This new formation meant he had no freedom and that’s what he said on Piers Morgan, he went to see Pep. This thing Zlatan said is what you guys have been running with. You & I are not privy to the conversation Messi had with Pep. Both parties have never addressed this before to give their side of the story, if they have, you can share me a link of them saying it just like I shared you that link (not screenshots from GOAL please, be serious for once). If any of their mates have addressed this before, please share too. Again, Zlatan’s issue at Barcelona was with Pep right from day 1 of driving a Ferrari, this has nothing to do with Messi. Let’s assume Messi spoke to Pep on changing formation, and Pep agreed, it’s on Pep and he’s the manager. Messi speaking to his manager is normal, just like Zlatan going to speak with Pep. If you listen to the video I attached of Salah, he clearly mentions he spoke to Slot on not defending, and he will still speak to Slot for them to adapt their formation because oppositions are finding out. Players are in constant communication with their managers. Whatever they spoke about, Pep is the manager not Messi. Easy with your bragging too, telling me you don’t just write and no one should dare you to bring evidences. After spending hours in your research, you even slept overnight, and the source you could reference is “Goal”😭 Listen to Zlatan talk about why he loves Messi so much, this was few days ago by the way Another Stop creating issues where there’s none.

TobyWrites

100,025 views • 28 days ago

When it came to the Epstein cover-up, Barnes named the one person he believes can actually blow the whole thing wide open: Tulsi Gabbard. She’s not just another politician, he said. Gabbard is a truth-teller with the guts to cut through the lies, expose the Deep State’s role, and hold the real criminals accountable. But Barnes didn’t stop there—he issued a blunt warning to Trump: keep trusting the same people, and it’s game over. “If he continues with this half-ass cover-up,” Barnes warned, “all it does is condemn him, not his adversaries.” In Barnes’s view, this is the turning point. Either Trump brings in someone fearless enough to drag the truth into the light—or he takes the fall for a cover-up he didn’t create. Because if nothing changes, the Deep State wins. Period.
4:18

When it came to the Epstein cover-up, Barnes named the one person he believes can actually blow the whole thing wide open: Tulsi Gabbard. She’s not just another politician, he said. Gabbard is a truth-teller with the guts to cut through the lies, expose the Deep State’s role, and hold the real criminals accountable. But Barnes didn’t stop there—he issued a blunt warning to Trump: keep trusting the same people, and it’s game over. “If he continues with this half-ass cover-up,” Barnes warned, “all it does is condemn him, not his adversaries.” In Barnes’s view, this is the turning point. Either Trump brings in someone fearless enough to drag the truth into the light—or he takes the fall for a cover-up he didn’t create. Because if nothing changes, the Deep State wins. Period.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

34,122 views • 11 months ago

Unpopular opinion: King Charles needs to stop believing he can have it both ways. He cannot keep trying to reconcile with Harry in private while expecting it not to become another public spectacle. Every opening becomes another round of headlines, speculation, and Palace drama. Every gesture of goodwill is followed by another controversy, another round of competing narratives, and another attempt to drag the monarchy into a public family dispute. Yet the Palace keeps acting as though one more invitation or one more accommodation will somehow change the outcome. It won’t. I understand Charles is a father, but he is also the King. His first duty is to protect the Crown, not keep giving opportunities for the institution to be pulled back into the same crisis over and over again. Good intentions don’t matter if the result is always the same. Harry made his choice when he stepped away from royal duties and repeatedly took private family matters into the public domain. Charles now has to make his. Either accept that Harry is a private family member and keep those relationships entirely separate from the institution, or stop expecting different results from the same approach. The current strategy isn’t compassionate. It’s ineffective. Every half-measure creates another opening for speculation, pressure, and public drama. At some point, the King has to stop managing the symptoms and deal with the problem. Firm boundaries aren’t punishment. They’re leadership.
0:50

Unpopular opinion: King Charles needs to stop believing he can have it both ways. He cannot keep trying to reconcile with Harry in private while expecting it not to become another public spectacle. Every opening becomes another round of headlines, speculation, and Palace drama. Every gesture of goodwill is followed by another controversy, another round of competing narratives, and another attempt to drag the monarchy into a public family dispute. Yet the Palace keeps acting as though one more invitation or one more accommodation will somehow change the outcome. It won’t. I understand Charles is a father, but he is also the King. His first duty is to protect the Crown, not keep giving opportunities for the institution to be pulled back into the same crisis over and over again. Good intentions don’t matter if the result is always the same. Harry made his choice when he stepped away from royal duties and repeatedly took private family matters into the public domain. Charles now has to make his. Either accept that Harry is a private family member and keep those relationships entirely separate from the institution, or stop expecting different results from the same approach. The current strategy isn’t compassionate. It’s ineffective. Every half-measure creates another opening for speculation, pressure, and public drama. At some point, the King has to stop managing the symptoms and deal with the problem. Firm boundaries aren’t punishment. They’re leadership.

Queen Esther

47,743 views • 11 days ago

🚨 APRIL 13, 2029 — A DATE THAT MIGHT CHANGE EVERYTHING “Apophis.” A name that means death. A rock the size of the Empire State Building hurtling through space at 19 miles per second. Scientists say it will skim closer to Earth than some satellites — threading a HALF-MILE WIDE “keyhole.” If it slips through, impact is guaranteed. Right now the chance sits at a sliver — but all it takes is one bump the size of a soccer ball to rewrite its course. Tonight I sat down with Peter — we dug into the cold numbers, the terrifying scenarios (500m tidal waves, a decade of nuclear-winter fallout), and the one simple truth the headlines miss: tiny adjustments now could save millions later. This isn’t science fiction. It’s a clock ticking through space. Watch the full interview. Learn what Apophis is, what a “keyhole” means, and — crucially — what can be done to deflect it. Knowledge saves lives. Share this. 🌌🛰️🔥 Peter R Mac Isaac
3:36

🚨 APRIL 13, 2029 — A DATE THAT MIGHT CHANGE EVERYTHING “Apophis.” A name that means death. A rock the size of the Empire State Building hurtling through space at 19 miles per second. Scientists say it will skim closer to Earth than some satellites — threading a HALF-MILE WIDE “keyhole.” If it slips through, impact is guaranteed. Right now the chance sits at a sliver — but all it takes is one bump the size of a soccer ball to rewrite its course. Tonight I sat down with Peter — we dug into the cold numbers, the terrifying scenarios (500m tidal waves, a decade of nuclear-winter fallout), and the one simple truth the headlines miss: tiny adjustments now could save millions later. This isn’t science fiction. It’s a clock ticking through space. Watch the full interview. Learn what Apophis is, what a “keyhole” means, and — crucially — what can be done to deflect it. Knowledge saves lives. Share this. 🌌🛰️🔥 Peter R Mac Isaac

Jim Ferguson

27,614 views • 10 months ago

He’s filming everyone at the market, but the police say there’s nothing they can do. Whose side are you on? A male videographer (the "auditor"), who is wearing a disguise for anonymity, is filming at an outdoor market. He is confronted by a market organizer (Kaylee Dolan) regarding his filming of vendors and attendees. A law enforcement officer arrives to mediate the dispute. ​The organizer expresses concern that the videographer is making vendors and patrons uncomfortable and asks him to stop or leave. The videographer asserts his right to film in a public area, refusing to comply with her request. ​The responding officer confirms that the videographer is in a public space where he has a legal right to record. The officer acknowledges the organizer's frustration but explains that, as no crime is being committed, he cannot compel the man to stop filming or force him to leave. ​The tension arises from the intersection of constitutional rights and personal expectations of privacy. ​Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, individuals generally have a protected right to film in public spaces (such as sidewalks, public parks, and plazas). This includes the right to film government officials and police officers performing their duties, as well as things that are plainly visible from those public areas. ​In general, there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a public space. If something can be seen by the naked eye from a location where a person is legally permitted to be, it is typically legal to photograph or record it. ​While filming is a protected activity, it is not absolute. If filming crosses the line into harassment, stalking, or disorderly conduct—or if it is done to "clandestinely" capture private or intimate areas, it can become illegal. In this specific interaction, the officer determined that the videographer’s actions did not meet the legal threshold for a crime, which is why he could not intervene. ​If the market were held on private property rather than public land, the owners or organizers would have the right to set rules regarding photography or to ask people to leave. If someone refuses to leave private property after being asked, they can be cited for trespassing. The officer's inability to remove the videographer suggests that the location was either public property or that the organizer lacked the legal authority to exclude him from that specific area.
6:03

He’s filming everyone at the market, but the police say there’s nothing they can do. Whose side are you on? A male videographer (the "auditor"), who is wearing a disguise for anonymity, is filming at an outdoor market. He is confronted by a market organizer (Kaylee Dolan) regarding his filming of vendors and attendees. A law enforcement officer arrives to mediate the dispute. ​The organizer expresses concern that the videographer is making vendors and patrons uncomfortable and asks him to stop or leave. The videographer asserts his right to film in a public area, refusing to comply with her request. ​The responding officer confirms that the videographer is in a public space where he has a legal right to record. The officer acknowledges the organizer's frustration but explains that, as no crime is being committed, he cannot compel the man to stop filming or force him to leave. ​The tension arises from the intersection of constitutional rights and personal expectations of privacy. ​Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, individuals generally have a protected right to film in public spaces (such as sidewalks, public parks, and plazas). This includes the right to film government officials and police officers performing their duties, as well as things that are plainly visible from those public areas. ​In general, there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a public space. If something can be seen by the naked eye from a location where a person is legally permitted to be, it is typically legal to photograph or record it. ​While filming is a protected activity, it is not absolute. If filming crosses the line into harassment, stalking, or disorderly conduct—or if it is done to "clandestinely" capture private or intimate areas, it can become illegal. In this specific interaction, the officer determined that the videographer’s actions did not meet the legal threshold for a crime, which is why he could not intervene. ​If the market were held on private property rather than public land, the owners or organizers would have the right to set rules regarding photography or to ask people to leave. If someone refuses to leave private property after being asked, they can be cited for trespassing. The officer's inability to remove the videographer suggests that the location was either public property or that the organizer lacked the legal authority to exclude him from that specific area.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

42,552 views • 1 month ago

As requested by Alex Miller yesterday, a look at our out of possession shape in the first half. 1: (10 secs) - Wednesday in a very narrow high block in a 523 out of possession. It only looked like this when the ball is central. Nowrich rotate (change positions during play) a lot and this narrow block denies central rotation. In this clip, they have had rotation in left back position as the CM has dropped into the area and left back on the last line. 2: 20 secs - When the ball went wide or started to move wide, the full back would advance up the pitch to pressure the full back and press full back to full back, whilst the CBs would come out with the Norwich forwards coming in between the lines, as this ball transitions across the pitch you see Sargent come out and Iorfa following tight. Fusire in this clip has come out to mark full back to full back and creating a makeshift back 4. 3: 47 secs - Wednesday get back into their narrow block shape 4: 56 secs - rotation from the front line form Norwich 5: 58 seconds, Palmer comes out of the back line to pick up the rotation and prevent space between lines. As the player turns to our left, Amass starts to come out to pick up full back to full back on the other side. In summary, Wednesday played their familiar 523 blocking shape out of possession but it was much more proactive in the back 5 than we usually see it, with full backs and Cbs following rotations and stepping out of the backline to prevent space between lines. It worked, first half. Norwich combated it a little better second half. Will get a clip out tomorrow of what they did
1:39

As requested by Alex Miller yesterday, a look at our out of possession shape in the first half. 1: (10 secs) - Wednesday in a very narrow high block in a 523 out of possession. It only looked like this when the ball is central. Nowrich rotate (change positions during play) a lot and this narrow block denies central rotation. In this clip, they have had rotation in left back position as the CM has dropped into the area and left back on the last line. 2: 20 secs - When the ball went wide or started to move wide, the full back would advance up the pitch to pressure the full back and press full back to full back, whilst the CBs would come out with the Norwich forwards coming in between the lines, as this ball transitions across the pitch you see Sargent come out and Iorfa following tight. Fusire in this clip has come out to mark full back to full back and creating a makeshift back 4. 3: 47 secs - Wednesday get back into their narrow block shape 4: 56 secs - rotation from the front line form Norwich 5: 58 seconds, Palmer comes out of the back line to pick up the rotation and prevent space between lines. As the player turns to our left, Amass starts to come out to pick up full back to full back on the other side. In summary, Wednesday played their familiar 523 blocking shape out of possession but it was much more proactive in the back 5 than we usually see it, with full backs and Cbs following rotations and stepping out of the backline to prevent space between lines. It worked, first half. Norwich combated it a little better second half. Will get a clip out tomorrow of what they did

TW Football

16,673 views • 8 months ago

Where do we draw the line when it comes to free speech? From the founding of this country to today’s digital platforms, the standards have changed dramatically—and most people don’t even realize how or why. I break down the evolution of the First Amendment, the role of the Supreme Court of the United States, and how doctrines like incorporation reshaped how speech is applied across the states. We’re now dealing with a landscape where some of the most dangerous rhetoric is protected—while the standards for accountability have become increasingly unclear. I also tackle the real-world consequences: what happens when speech crosses into incitement, when it fuels violence, or when it targets individuals and institutions? And who decides where that line is? Government? Private companies? Society itself? This isn’t about silencing ideas—it’s about understanding the difference between protected speech and destructive rhetoric that can lead to real harm. If we don’t ask these questions—and demand serious answers—we risk losing the ability to have meaningful, responsible debate in a free society. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:
7:27

Where do we draw the line when it comes to free speech? From the founding of this country to today’s digital platforms, the standards have changed dramatically—and most people don’t even realize how or why. I break down the evolution of the First Amendment, the role of the Supreme Court of the United States, and how doctrines like incorporation reshaped how speech is applied across the states. We’re now dealing with a landscape where some of the most dangerous rhetoric is protected—while the standards for accountability have become increasingly unclear. I also tackle the real-world consequences: what happens when speech crosses into incitement, when it fuels violence, or when it targets individuals and institutions? And who decides where that line is? Government? Private companies? Society itself? This isn’t about silencing ideas—it’s about understanding the difference between protected speech and destructive rhetoric that can lead to real harm. If we don’t ask these questions—and demand serious answers—we risk losing the ability to have meaningful, responsible debate in a free society. To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

24,634 views • 2 months ago

WHY France’s Biggest Problem Might Be Kylian Mbappé… France probably have the most frightening squad at the World Cup. Mbappé, Dembélé, Olise, Cherki, Tchouaméni, Saliba, Upamecano, Konaté, Maignan. The depth is ridiculous, and on talent alone they have to be considered one of the favourites. But there is one problem Deschamps still hasn’t solved. Mbappé increasingly operates as France’s number nine, yet he doesn’t really play like one. He wants freedom, drifts wide, drops deep and looks to become the focal point of attacks. The issue is that when he vacates central areas, somebody still needs to occupy the centre-backs. That could become a major issue. With Ekitike injured, France lose the profile that looked perfectly suited to balancing the attack. So can Thuram provide that presence? Or will Deschamps need to turn to Mateta when games become more physical? Defensively, France remain terrifying. Their transition defence might be the best in the tournament, with Saliba, Upamecano, Konaté and Tchouaméni capable of shutting down counters almost on their own. Add in their aerial power and athleticism, and very few teams can match them physically. But possession remains the question mark. France still lack a clear repeatable build-up structure and often rely on moments of brilliance rather than sustained control. That makes the Olise versus Cherki debate fascinating. One offers a direct route to goal, the other might be the player who actually connects the team. If Deschamps finds the right balance around Mbappé, France have enough talent to win the World Cup. But if those attacking issues persist, another deep run could end in familiar fashion. France fans, are Les Bleus lifting the trophy or falling just short again? 👀🇫🇷 📹Samson Kalnińş Brough
1:53

WHY France’s Biggest Problem Might Be Kylian Mbappé… France probably have the most frightening squad at the World Cup. Mbappé, Dembélé, Olise, Cherki, Tchouaméni, Saliba, Upamecano, Konaté, Maignan. The depth is ridiculous, and on talent alone they have to be considered one of the favourites. But there is one problem Deschamps still hasn’t solved. Mbappé increasingly operates as France’s number nine, yet he doesn’t really play like one. He wants freedom, drifts wide, drops deep and looks to become the focal point of attacks. The issue is that when he vacates central areas, somebody still needs to occupy the centre-backs. That could become a major issue. With Ekitike injured, France lose the profile that looked perfectly suited to balancing the attack. So can Thuram provide that presence? Or will Deschamps need to turn to Mateta when games become more physical? Defensively, France remain terrifying. Their transition defence might be the best in the tournament, with Saliba, Upamecano, Konaté and Tchouaméni capable of shutting down counters almost on their own. Add in their aerial power and athleticism, and very few teams can match them physically. But possession remains the question mark. France still lack a clear repeatable build-up structure and often rely on moments of brilliance rather than sustained control. That makes the Olise versus Cherki debate fascinating. One offers a direct route to goal, the other might be the player who actually connects the team. If Deschamps finds the right balance around Mbappé, France have enough talent to win the World Cup. But if those attacking issues persist, another deep run could end in familiar fashion. France fans, are Les Bleus lifting the trophy or falling just short again? 👀🇫🇷 📹Samson Kalnińş Brough

Pythagoras In Boots ⚽️

14,391 views • 1 month ago

Mourinho comments on football's recent tactical revolution. "I think the problem is when people want to make copy-paste without having the conditions for it. If you want a full-back playing inside, you need a player with a certain adaptability. If a full-back is weak on attack, I like to say that he shouldn't attack from the inside or from the outside. He should stay back and build alongside the centre-backs. Something I don't like is when I see coaches trying to copy-paste things they saw but doing it in completely different contexts. If you want to build with the goalkeeper with a goalkeeper that has a wooden leg, it will be complicated. For example, when Pep arrived to Manchester City, the goalkeeper was the best English goalkeeper, which was Joe Hart. Pep didn't want Joe Hart, he wanted Claudio Bravo, coming from Barcelona with that culture of playing from behind. But then it wasn't enough, he wanted more than Claudio Bravo, so he signed Ederson, who could play short and long. If you want to copy-paste the ideas of a coach who can buy, and buy, and buy, it will be complicated. And then you also have those coaches who try to do things that just don't work, and because of that they die, but they say 'I died but I died by my ideas'. My friend, if you died by your ideas you are stupid."
1:56

Mourinho comments on football's recent tactical revolution. "I think the problem is when people want to make copy-paste without having the conditions for it. If you want a full-back playing inside, you need a player with a certain adaptability. If a full-back is weak on attack, I like to say that he shouldn't attack from the inside or from the outside. He should stay back and build alongside the centre-backs. Something I don't like is when I see coaches trying to copy-paste things they saw but doing it in completely different contexts. If you want to build with the goalkeeper with a goalkeeper that has a wooden leg, it will be complicated. For example, when Pep arrived to Manchester City, the goalkeeper was the best English goalkeeper, which was Joe Hart. Pep didn't want Joe Hart, he wanted Claudio Bravo, coming from Barcelona with that culture of playing from behind. But then it wasn't enough, he wanted more than Claudio Bravo, so he signed Ederson, who could play short and long. If you want to copy-paste the ideas of a coach who can buy, and buy, and buy, it will be complicated. And then you also have those coaches who try to do things that just don't work, and because of that they die, but they say 'I died but I died by my ideas'. My friend, if you died by your ideas you are stupid."

IM🇵🇹

923,069 views • 11 months ago

All coaches, take note. Rayan Cherki was filmed by Keepitonthedeck at the St Kevins Academy Cup ten years ago. Back then not once in that entire tournament was he met with shouts of pass the ball. Not once was he taken off for attempting tricks or flicks. No one barked at him to run aimlessly. What we saw was a young player given true freedom. At twelve years of age, playing against thirteen year olds, his ability was not just impressive, it was joyful to watch. It made people smile and at times even laugh at how effortlessly he played. Comfortable on both feet at that age as well. What stood out most was not just his skill, but the environment around him. He was allowed to express himself and grow, without being restricted by a coach or confined by a system. We even witnessed him lead and take entire team warm ups, given ownership of a team with players older than him. Coaches are there to help talent, not destroy them. Both types of coaches exist, so careful which ones you play under! As Cherki said himself, “If we don't play with pleasure, you can't play better, you can't show what you want.”
0:30

All coaches, take note. Rayan Cherki was filmed by Keepitonthedeck at the St Kevins Academy Cup ten years ago. Back then not once in that entire tournament was he met with shouts of pass the ball. Not once was he taken off for attempting tricks or flicks. No one barked at him to run aimlessly. What we saw was a young player given true freedom. At twelve years of age, playing against thirteen year olds, his ability was not just impressive, it was joyful to watch. It made people smile and at times even laugh at how effortlessly he played. Comfortable on both feet at that age as well. What stood out most was not just his skill, but the environment around him. He was allowed to express himself and grow, without being restricted by a coach or confined by a system. We even witnessed him lead and take entire team warm ups, given ownership of a team with players older than him. Coaches are there to help talent, not destroy them. Both types of coaches exist, so careful which ones you play under! As Cherki said himself, “If we don't play with pleasure, you can't play better, you can't show what you want.”

Keepitonthedeck

67,297 views • 3 months ago

Walter Isaacson: Musk is driven by mission more than any person I've ever seen. “It's not only mission, it's cosmic missions. He's got three really big missions. One is to make humans a space-faring civilization, make us multiplanetary or get us to Mars. Number two is to bring us into the era of sustainable energy, to bring us into the era of electric vehicles, solar roofs and battery packs. And third is to make sure that artificial intelligence is safe and is aligned with human values. Every now and then, I'd talk to him, and we'd be talking about Starlink satellites or whatever, or he would be pushing the people in front of him at SpaceX and saying, if you do this, we'll never get to Mars in our lifetime. Then he would give the lecture of how important it was for human consciousness to get to Mars in our lifetime. And I'm thinking, okay, this is the pep talk of somebody trying to inspire a team. Or maybe it's the type of pontification you do on a podcast. But on the 20th time I watched him, I realized, okay, I believe it. He actually is driven by this.” Lex Fridman Podcast, September 10, 2023
1:17

Walter Isaacson: Musk is driven by mission more than any person I've ever seen. “It's not only mission, it's cosmic missions. He's got three really big missions. One is to make humans a space-faring civilization, make us multiplanetary or get us to Mars. Number two is to bring us into the era of sustainable energy, to bring us into the era of electric vehicles, solar roofs and battery packs. And third is to make sure that artificial intelligence is safe and is aligned with human values. Every now and then, I'd talk to him, and we'd be talking about Starlink satellites or whatever, or he would be pushing the people in front of him at SpaceX and saying, if you do this, we'll never get to Mars in our lifetime. Then he would give the lecture of how important it was for human consciousness to get to Mars in our lifetime. And I'm thinking, okay, this is the pep talk of somebody trying to inspire a team. Or maybe it's the type of pontification you do on a podcast. But on the 20th time I watched him, I realized, okay, I believe it. He actually is driven by this.” Lex Fridman Podcast, September 10, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,177,802 views • 1 year ago

Our first goal last night requires a longer look. It starts in transition with Bannan winning it back on the half way line on the left, and then Johnson recycles to Famewo and then to Beadle. Go through the annotations: 1: Beadle allows Hogan to get right on top of him. This is crucial as it means he is behind Bernard who will be the recipient of the ball 2: because Birmingham are defending deep with a high line (always find this strange), it leaves a lot of space in the middle. 3: Poveda drops back to 4 spaces and just recognises the space behind the defensive drop and holds to recycle. 4: Cadz then pulls off into the 10 space, the red zone - as Rohl calls it. Where I know they work on the reverse wide. Because of the camera change, you can just see Poveda's head on the screen, but he has run from 4 spaces to the right wing. 5: Cadz recognising space against the drop and taking the defender with him. 6: Ugbo holding the ground against the drop to remain in space. This is a high quality team goal that come off the training ground. That's why it's important to accept the keeper having that extra touch and midfielders recycling rather than always playing forward. We were dominated in possession yesterday, but when we did have it, we didn't just launch it - we actually played snappy football - playing in bursts with control.
0:53

Our first goal last night requires a longer look. It starts in transition with Bannan winning it back on the half way line on the left, and then Johnson recycles to Famewo and then to Beadle. Go through the annotations: 1: Beadle allows Hogan to get right on top of him. This is crucial as it means he is behind Bernard who will be the recipient of the ball 2: because Birmingham are defending deep with a high line (always find this strange), it leaves a lot of space in the middle. 3: Poveda drops back to 4 spaces and just recognises the space behind the defensive drop and holds to recycle. 4: Cadz then pulls off into the 10 space, the red zone - as Rohl calls it. Where I know they work on the reverse wide. Because of the camera change, you can just see Poveda's head on the screen, but he has run from 4 spaces to the right wing. 5: Cadz recognising space against the drop and taking the defender with him. 6: Ugbo holding the ground against the drop to remain in space. This is a high quality team goal that come off the training ground. That's why it's important to accept the keeper having that extra touch and midfielders recycling rather than always playing forward. We were dominated in possession yesterday, but when we did have it, we didn't just launch it - we actually played snappy football - playing in bursts with control.

TW Football

100,737 views • 2 years ago

Steve Nash says Jalen Brunson stands out because of one trait above everything else: his will to win. “Last year he was the Clutch Player of the Year, and for me that starts with how badly he wants to win.” “Everybody talks about the shot-making, but what I love is how smart he is with his body.” “He plays off two feet, has incredible touch, and gets shots off at awkward timings defenders can’t predict.” “It’s not a floater, not a layup, not a runner. It’s just a unique shot on the move.” “As a defender, you can’t time it because you never know when he’s going to release it.” “He’s also elite at cutting defenders off and controlling space.” “He gets in front of you, stops the game, and forces the defense to react to him.” “Once he creates that pocket of space, he’s asking the defense: ‘Who’s going to come guard this?’” “If someone helps, he already knows where the next pass is.” “He’s great at turning small advantages into big ones and making the defense play on his terms.”
1:58

Steve Nash says Jalen Brunson stands out because of one trait above everything else: his will to win. “Last year he was the Clutch Player of the Year, and for me that starts with how badly he wants to win.” “Everybody talks about the shot-making, but what I love is how smart he is with his body.” “He plays off two feet, has incredible touch, and gets shots off at awkward timings defenders can’t predict.” “It’s not a floater, not a layup, not a runner. It’s just a unique shot on the move.” “As a defender, you can’t time it because you never know when he’s going to release it.” “He’s also elite at cutting defenders off and controlling space.” “He gets in front of you, stops the game, and forces the defense to react to him.” “Once he creates that pocket of space, he’s asking the defense: ‘Who’s going to come guard this?’” “If someone helps, he already knows where the next pass is.” “He’s great at turning small advantages into big ones and making the defense play on his terms.”

KΞRL_✂️

103,511 views • 1 month ago

🔥WOW.. MIKE BENZ JUST GAVE THE DOJ THE BLUEPRINT FOR RICO PREDICATE FOR THE SOROS NETWORK. This is another MUST WATCH because it is DEAD TO RIGHTS. It’s important to understand Mike Benz delineates between people openly free to protest what they disagree with but he breaks down succinctly where it crosses over the line when you are IMPEDING EMERGENCY SERVICES, OCCUPYING BUILDINGS & BLOCKING THE HIGHWAYS. Mike keeps harkening back on the key to all of this..they were TEACHING TRAINING SEMINARS on how to conduct these acts LOL..it’s times like I miss Rudy W. Giuliani in the administration. There is a reason they wanted the RICO king ostracized and bankrupted..he’s an American hero and a brilliant lawyer. There is a reason Mike is banging the drums or “Pots & Pans” ..have you on WANTING THE DOCUMENTS & it is simply because if it is PREMEDITATED the PAPER TRAILER can be established it is the absolute Ballgame if it demonstrates COORDINATION. That is why Mike wants these CHURLA docs to see if these RENT-A-MOBS emails will lay out the breadcrumb trail to paid activities to commit these unlawful acts. He nails it when he equates it occupying buildings for hire ..because they jailed J6ers for ENTERING THE BUILDINGS & merely passing thru escorted..without planning or payment. He gave you the Blueprint. Build the building please. This will send shockwaves and set a precedent to ensure it is NEVER attempted again.
7:25

🔥WOW.. MIKE BENZ JUST GAVE THE DOJ THE BLUEPRINT FOR RICO PREDICATE FOR THE SOROS NETWORK. This is another MUST WATCH because it is DEAD TO RIGHTS. It’s important to understand Mike Benz delineates between people openly free to protest what they disagree with but he breaks down succinctly where it crosses over the line when you are IMPEDING EMERGENCY SERVICES, OCCUPYING BUILDINGS & BLOCKING THE HIGHWAYS. Mike keeps harkening back on the key to all of this..they were TEACHING TRAINING SEMINARS on how to conduct these acts LOL..it’s times like I miss Rudy W. Giuliani in the administration. There is a reason they wanted the RICO king ostracized and bankrupted..he’s an American hero and a brilliant lawyer. There is a reason Mike is banging the drums or “Pots & Pans” ..have you on WANTING THE DOCUMENTS & it is simply because if it is PREMEDITATED the PAPER TRAILER can be established it is the absolute Ballgame if it demonstrates COORDINATION. That is why Mike wants these CHURLA docs to see if these RENT-A-MOBS emails will lay out the breadcrumb trail to paid activities to commit these unlawful acts. He nails it when he equates it occupying buildings for hire ..because they jailed J6ers for ENTERING THE BUILDINGS & merely passing thru escorted..without planning or payment. He gave you the Blueprint. Build the building please. This will send shockwaves and set a precedent to ensure it is NEVER attempted again.

Johnny St.Pete

138,825 views • 10 months ago

Where does free speech end—and real danger begin? In this clip, I explain how the legal standards around speech have evolved in America, and why today’s environment makes it harder than ever to define the line between protected expression and incitement. I walk through how the First Amendment has been interpreted over time—especially with changes introduced by the courts that expanded protections for speech, even when it’s offensive or extreme. But here’s the real issue: not all speech is equal. We already limit certain types—whether it’s commercial speech, explicit content, or harmful material—and yet when it comes to rhetoric that can inflame or incite real-world harm, the standards become murky. I raise the question: what happens when speech crosses into something more dangerous—and who decides? This isn’t about silencing debate—it’s about understanding responsibility in a free society. Because if we can’t define the line, we risk either losing our freedoms—or allowing them to be abused in ways that damage the country itself To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:
9:00

Where does free speech end—and real danger begin? In this clip, I explain how the legal standards around speech have evolved in America, and why today’s environment makes it harder than ever to define the line between protected expression and incitement. I walk through how the First Amendment has been interpreted over time—especially with changes introduced by the courts that expanded protections for speech, even when it’s offensive or extreme. But here’s the real issue: not all speech is equal. We already limit certain types—whether it’s commercial speech, explicit content, or harmful material—and yet when it comes to rhetoric that can inflame or incite real-world harm, the standards become murky. I raise the question: what happens when speech crosses into something more dangerous—and who decides? This isn’t about silencing debate—it’s about understanding responsibility in a free society. Because if we can’t define the line, we risk either losing our freedoms—or allowing them to be abused in ways that damage the country itself To watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

34,769 views • 2 months ago