Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

How powerful is Gemini 3.5 Flash? In a recent research preview, we pushed it to the extreme, powering 93 subagents across 15,314 model calls that wrote a custom kernel, filesystem, and drivers from scratch. 12 hours later, it booted Doom. 🖥️ This is just a glimpse of the model's...

252,581 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

35 Yorum

Anand Lahoti profil fotoğrafı
Anand Lahoti3 ay önce

Please don’t it’s really not that powerful. Stop with fake marketing. I am really disappointed with Gemini models. And I loved them earlier

Google Antigravity profil fotoğrafı
Google Antigravity3 ay önce

Learn more

Google Antigravity profil fotoğrafı
Google Antigravity3 ay önce

Watch Antigravity boot up Doom live

Beebs profil fotoğrafı
Beebs3 ay önce

Gemini 3 flash was excellent because it was very reliable as a conversational agent and affordable enough to use it as one. 3.5 is so expensive it prices out this use case and still lacks the agentic coding capabilities of frontier models. It’s poorly positioned.

吉田製作所 profil fotoğrafı
吉田製作所3 ay önce

試した限りはポンコツですね

Jitendra Kumar Kumawat profil fotoğrafı
Jitendra Kumar Kumawat3 ay önce

I really love it.... The only concern is model limit. 3x limits are done in within 1 hours...

Rozzabuilds profil fotoğrafı
Rozzabuilds3 ay önce

I’ll stick with Opus I think

Trebell profil fotoğrafı
Trebell3 ay önce

Can ya all make it token efficient? Or increase agy rate limits? Its practically impossible to do anything even with the paid plan

Denis B profil fotoğrafı
Denis B3 ay önce

I think I speak for all of us when I say I am glad YOU guys like it.. and I wish we could enjoy it as much as you.

UnBoringTech profil fotoğrafı
UnBoringTech3 ay önce

15314 model calls to boot a game from 1993 is the most expensive way to play doom ever.

Saw profil fotoğrafı
Saw3 ay önce

Yeah... but also talk about how much quota they drain though 😂 –can barely work 1 hr 💀

Divine profil fotoğrafı
Divine3 ay önce

I don't know about this, but it couldn't even build a functioning web ui for me. Had to fall back on 3.1 Pro for everything.

Max M. Chang profil fotoğrafı
Max M. Chang3 ay önce

Digital-twin built with @antigravity @GoogleAIStudio and @GeminiApp

Skullthoughts profil fotoğrafı
Skullthoughts3 ay önce

I'am so impressed with it that i have cancelled my subscription.

Kostas Oreopoulos profil fotoğrafı
Kostas Oreopoulos3 ay önce

Unfortunately, with the latest release, and quota calculation,I could not complete a 5-hour session with any of the models in an ultra subscription. Cancelled subscription, went with codex, problem solved

Angel profil fotoğrafı
Angel3 ay önce

git clone Done with one tool call.

D. Izaac profil fotoğrafı
D. Izaac3 ay önce

Gemini 3.5 it's bullshit! At least when we talk about code!

Automate With David profil fotoğrafı
Automate With David3 ay önce

I see moments of genius in Gemini models, but it is fleeting, feels like the training data isn't uncleaned, and the models glitch hard, or that the harness is (metaphorically) unstable. You guys and gals got all that compute. Stabilize Anti-Gravity.

Mohammad Saed profil fotoğrafı
Mohammad Saed3 ay önce

This is a massive validation for high-throughput, cost-effective models like Gemini 3.5 Flash acting as the runtime for complex agent swarms. Orchestrating 93 subagents across 15k+ model calls to build a functional kernel from scratch proves that orchestration layers and asynchronous parallel execution loops are becoming more critical than just raw parameter size. Phenomenal showcase.

𝘿𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙙 ✦ 𝙈𝙂𝙏 profil fotoğrafı
𝘿𝙖𝙫𝙞𝙙 ✦ 𝙈𝙂𝙏3 ay önce

93 agents coordinating system code is the real flex here. Token spend had to be brutal - that's what'll make or break agent orchestration in production.

Victor Azevedo profil fotoğrafı
Victor Azevedo3 ay önce

Honestly, what is the point if almost nobody can actually use it? I have a paid plan and I still keep hitting quotas constantly. Sometimes I have to wait 5 hours to continue a simple thing. There’s no clear explanation about quota, what is the 5-hour limit or week.

Olivier profil fotoğrafı
Olivier3 ay önce

That's cool but nobody can do that even Ith the most expensive subscription. So don't advertise this

vodya sovochca profil fotoğrafı
vodya sovochca3 ay önce

Key Antigravity probs: 1) WTF no subagents in IDE ver? BS! 2) New cloud model lims shock: $200 sub burned wkly lims in 1d (easier get Claude Code $20 same lims) 3) add Opus 4.8!!!

alex profil fotoğrafı
alex3 ay önce

Flash 3.5 is great model. Please keep Google in this direction. Fast, smart and cheap. Make it smarter and cheaper

Athrix ☄️ profil fotoğrafı
Athrix ☄️3 ay önce

My @Google Always Cooks best 🫶🏻❤️ @antigravity gemini 3.5 flash 10/10

Sōma profil fotoğrafı
Sōma3 ay önce

INCREASE THE QUOTA LIMIT!!!

Emre Ates profil fotoğrafı
Emre Ates3 ay önce

Nah Gemini is a garbage now. You guys lose ai race lol.

まどか|《🇺🇸US株ジャーナル/🇯🇵日本証券ニュース》note&書籍で配信中! profil fotoğrafı
まどか|《🇺🇸US株ジャーナル/🇯🇵日本証券ニュース》note&書籍で配信中!3 ay önce

ClaudeもGPTも制限がきついのはわかる 他社へ支払いが発生するもんね でもさ GeminiのQuota制限が厳しすぎて使えないよ… Ai Proなのに全然作業が進まないよ😭

CodeWasher profil fotoğrafı
CodeWasher3 ay önce

It's super fast in response but super erroneous in making answers

Tong Chen profil fotoğrafı
Tong Chen3 ay önce

Do you guys even use your own antigravy and 3.5 flash? Oh maybe you guys dont use codex or claude...time to get out of your own bubble

Labomen profil fotoğrafı
Labomen3 ay önce

Come on, r/osdev gets new vibe-coded OSes posted literally almost daily, any frontier Claude/GPT model is capable of that, and far more than just shell + DOOM.

Bias profil fotoğrafı
Bias3 ay önce

Booting Doom from 93 subagents writing a kernel from scratch is an absurd flex in the best way. The orchestration overhead at that scale is the wild part.

Ayman profil fotoğrafı
Ayman3 ay önce

As much as I love Google, but your models have the worst tool calling capability ever. None of your models know how to use tools, specially using Aisdk

James Martinez profil fotoğrafı
James Martinez3 ay önce

I’ve been having a great experience so far with Antigravity and Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium). The most natural language AI tool I’ve used so far. More natural than Claude Desktop/Code, Grok build, and GitHub Copilot CLI. Excited for 3.5 Pro!

Aykan Kömürcü ⚡️ profil fotoğrafı
Aykan Kömürcü ⚡️3 ay önce

As a developer working on complex health-tech applications, I depend on model stability. What you see in the video is a total breakdown of context management. It’s not just an error; it’s a complete drift from the user’s intent. We are talking about an advanced model that suddenly hallucinates unrelated code blocks instead of processing the provided logic. This needs an urgent root-cause analysis. @GoogleDeepMind @GoogleAI

Benzer Videolar

Cerebras inference is very fast. So fast that it changes how we think about configuring our LLMs for voice agent use cases. Kimi K2.6 is a 1T parameter reasoning model that Cerebras serves at 650 - 1,000 tokens per second (end-to-end throughput), with time to first token metrics as low as 150ms (latency). These numbers are two to three times faster than other similarly capable models. The biggest lever we get from this kind of speed is that we can use the model in reasoning mode, and still have excellent "time to first non-thinking token." This solves a big pain point we have in 2026 for voice agent use cases. Almost all recent innovation in post-training has focused on making models good at reasoning ("test time compute"). This is great, but it makes the user-facing model latency much, much slower. Which is a problem for conversational voice agents. We can run Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned on, and get responses faster than other models produce with reasoning disabled. On my 30-turn voice agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 with reasoning enabled ties GPT 5.1 and Haiku 4.5 with reasoning disabled, and is still about 200ms seconds faster! On my primary task agent benchmark, Kimi K2.6 is now the #2 model. It ranks just behind Gemini 3.5 Flash in "high" reasoning mode, and tied with GLM 5, Sonnet 4.6, and GPT 5.4 with reasoning set to "low." But Kimi K2.6 completes each turn in the agent loop in under 500ms. The other four models are all at least 3x slower. (Models only qualify for this benchmark if they can complete task turns at a P50 <4s.) A couple of other things that this speed buys us, for production voice agents: - Tool calls happen fast enough that we don't have to work around tool call latency in our pipeline design. - We can prompt the model to output structured data at the beginning of a response, followed by plain text for voice generation. This opens up possibilities like asking the model to do complex classification/generation tasks that influence the rest of the pipeline. For example, the model could create a detailed style prompt for a steerable TTS model, for each individual conversation turn. And, of course, you can use Kimi K2.6 with reasoning turned off. Cerebras calls this "instant" mode. Here's a video of a Cerebras Kimi K2.6 voice agent with voice-to-voice response time, measured at the client, under 500ms. This is the true response latency as perceived by the user, including all network and audio codec overhead, transcription and turn detection, Kimi K2.6 token generation, and voice generation. 500ms is, effectively, instant. So the Cerebras naming for this mode is a propos. :-)

kwindla

40,593 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce