Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

How should L2s outsource proofs without compromising decentralization? In this talk from ZK Hub, Norbert Vadas, Head of Product at Gevulot Labs (ZkCloud), breaks down the risks of auction-based proving marketplaces and argues for a permissionless, randomized, and redundant approach to proof infrastructure. A clear case against centralizing trust...

29,104 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

House of ZK's profile picture
House of ZK1 year ago

Key Takeaways - Practical Challenges in Proof Outsourcing by @NorbertVadas of @gevulot_labs/@thezkcloud Risks of Auction-Based Proof Marketplaces • Auction-style proof markets risk centralization by favoring resource-rich entities. • Bidding races lead to wasted compute and create unhealthy dependencies for rollups. • One-to-one auction matching lacks redundancy - failure requires restarting the process. Lessons from Ethereum’s PBS Model • MEV relays show that centralization can re-emerge even in large validator sets: 5 builders account for 90% of PBS blocks. • Applying similar relay logic to ZK proving could lead to few provers dominating rollup finality. Importance of Decentralization and Liveness • Provers must inherit the same censorship resistance, neutrality, and liveness guarantees as the underlying network. • Randomized prover selection, not auctions, is the most credible neutrality mechanism, akin to validator selection in PoS chains. Need for Redundancy and Fallbacks • Protocols must build in fallback options (e.g. secondary provers, open job windows) to ensure liveness and prevent downtime. • Sequencers should not have to manually restart the proving process in case of failures. Gevulot’s ZKCloud Architecture • zkCloud uses permissionless, decentralized prover selection with built-in redundancy. • Economics are protocol-driven to prevent cost manipulation by dominant provers. • Designed specifically to meet the reliability and decentralization needs of L2s. • Firestarter testnet is live for exploration. Core Thesis • Proof infrastructure should not reintroduce central points of failure. • Decentralized L2s require decentralized proving, not trusted middlemen.

Breakout's profile picture
Breakout1 year ago

Want to understand financial markets and learn how to manage capital effectively? Join our free course on Breakout Discord! Breakout is a professional platform offering access to 100+ market assets. We provide fair & transparent conditions to help you reach your financial goals

#LFGOAT /GOAT 🟡's profile picture
#LFGOAT /GOAT 🟡1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud This talk offered a deep look into the challenges of ZK rollup infrastructure. It was very insightful.

tcp user , 💙 ZKM 💙 GOAT 🟡 (Ø,G) .ink's profile picture
tcp user , 💙 ZKM 💙 GOAT 🟡 (Ø,G) .ink1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud A deep and technical discussion

Laura Pollina's profile picture
Laura Pollina1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud Randomized and redundant > risky and rigid.

Irene Kegel's profile picture
Irene Kegel1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud Love the push for truly decentralized infrastructure.

Claire Benear's profile picture
Claire Benear1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud Trustless systems need trustless proofs.

Chappo Randal's profile picture
Chappo Randal1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud ZK rollups need true decentralization

Maroni Dario's profile picture
Maroni Dario1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud Permissionless, randomized proofs FTW

Marx Rodolfo's profile picture
Marx Rodolfo1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud Centralized trust in ZK? Not ideal

Panda Crypto's profile picture
Panda Crypto1 year ago

@Zk_Hub_Global @NorbertVadas @gevulot_labs @thezkcloud Decentralized proofs are the future of ZK

Related Videos