正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

How to sketch a polynomial function graph. This is a 10th degree polynomial.

Math Magician

4,803 subscribers

21,811 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

2 条评论

Manu 的头像

Manu4 天前

@davidobrador M'ha fet pensar en l'activitat que ens vas fer a l'Arabat0!

Ado_rabbit 的头像

Ado_rabbit5 天前

这个不是高中学过的穿针引线法吗？

相关视频

This video, created by my dear coauthor Mahdi E Kahou for our teaching and papers, shows how overparameterized neural networks produce smooth function approximations even in the context of the Runge phenomenon. Some background. Imagine you want to approximate the Runge function using polynomial interpolation at equally spaced points. It is well known that, despite targeting an infinitely differentiable function, such a polynomial approximation produces oscillatory behavior that worsens with the degree of the polynomial. In other words, higher-degree polynomial approximations might not improve accuracy. Instead, approximate the Runge function with a neural network (here, two layers are just to make the example concrete; nothing fundamental depends on it). As you increase the number of parameters well above the 11 training points (in our example, a two-layer neural network with 128 nodes each), you nicely converge to the target, without wild oscillations. Yes, this has much to do with double descent and benign overparameterization, but the main punchline of this post is that neural networks are really very different types of animals than polynomial approximations. And yes, Chebyshev nodes and splines exist, and in this case, they will prevent the oscillations. But that's not the point. Chebyshev nodes and splines still confront Faber’s theorem, which states that for any system of polynomial interpolation nodes, there exists a continuous function whose sequence of interpolating polynomials diverges as the number of nodes grows to infinity. Faber’s theorem does not apply to neural networks because they are not polynomials. The notebook, if you want to check the details, is here: Stay tuned for more on this 👀

This video, created by my dear coauthor Mahdi E Kahou for our teaching and papers, shows how overparameterized neural networks produce smooth function approximations even in the context of the Runge phenomenon. Some background. Imagine you want to approximate the Runge function using polynomial interpolation at equally spaced points. It is well known that, despite targeting an infinitely differentiable function, such a polynomial approximation produces oscillatory behavior that worsens with the degree of the polynomial. In other words, higher-degree polynomial approximations might not improve accuracy. Instead, approximate the Runge function with a neural network (here, two layers are just to make the example concrete; nothing fundamental depends on it). As you increase the number of parameters well above the 11 training points (in our example, a two-layer neural network with 128 nodes each), you nicely converge to the target, without wild oscillations. Yes, this has much to do with double descent and benign overparameterization, but the main punchline of this post is that neural networks are really very different types of animals than polynomial approximations. And yes, Chebyshev nodes and splines exist, and in this case, they will prevent the oscillations. But that's not the point. Chebyshev nodes and splines still confront Faber’s theorem, which states that for any system of polynomial interpolation nodes, there exists a continuous function whose sequence of interpolating polynomials diverges as the number of nodes grows to infinity. Faber’s theorem does not apply to neural networks because they are not polynomials. The notebook, if you want to check the details, is here: Stay tuned for more on this 👀

Jesús Fernández-Villaverde

47,212 次观看 • 4 个月前

still on understanding zkSNARKs, how do we get from polynomial to proof?

still on understanding zkSNARKs, how do we get from polynomial to proof?

Nyakio

12,055 次观看 • 3 个月前

You start with a plain old complex polynomial p(z) = a₀ + a₁z + … + aₙzⁿ. Instead of fixing the coefficients, you treat them as variables in a controlled experiment and modulate them. Maybe you draw each aₖ from some distribution, or you let them drift along a parameter path. Do that 50,000 times, say, and you no longer have a polynomial. You have an ensemble. For each realization, the goal is the same Find its roots. Instead of attacking p(z)=0 directly with something like fsolve, you rewrite the polynomial as a matrix problem. Specifically, you build its Companion Matrix. For a monic polynomial zⁿ + bₙ₋₁zⁿ⁻¹ + … + b₀ the companion matrix is an n×n matrix whose last column contains the coefficients (with minus signs), and whose subdiagonal is filled with ones. Everything else is zero. It’s sparse, structured and deterministic. The theorem that makes this worth doing is simple and beautiful The eigenvalues of the companion matrix are exactly the roots of the polynomial. So each polynomial sample becomes a matrix. Each matrix becomes an eigenvalue problem. And eigenvalues are something numerical linear algebra is very, very good at computing.

You start with a plain old complex polynomial p(z) = a₀ + a₁z + … + aₙzⁿ. Instead of fixing the coefficients, you treat them as variables in a controlled experiment and modulate them. Maybe you draw each aₖ from some distribution, or you let them drift along a parameter path. Do that 50,000 times, say, and you no longer have a polynomial. You have an ensemble. For each realization, the goal is the same Find its roots. Instead of attacking p(z)=0 directly with something like fsolve, you rewrite the polynomial as a matrix problem. Specifically, you build its Companion Matrix. For a monic polynomial zⁿ + bₙ₋₁zⁿ⁻¹ + … + b₀ the companion matrix is an n×n matrix whose last column contains the coefficients (with minus signs), and whose subdiagonal is filled with ones. Everything else is zero. It’s sparse, structured and deterministic. The theorem that makes this worth doing is simple and beautiful The eigenvalues of the companion matrix are exactly the roots of the polynomial. So each polynomial sample becomes a matrix. Each matrix becomes an eigenvalue problem. And eigenvalues are something numerical linear algebra is very, very good at computing.

Mathelirium

15,566 次观看 • 6 个月前

Polynomial division can look intimidating, but we can make this more accessible by drawing rectangles!

Polynomial division can look intimidating, but we can make this more accessible by drawing rectangles!

Howie Hua

36,278 次观看 • 3 年前

Zero Fee Perps are now LIVE on Polynomial Trade. 0% maker & taker fees on ETH and BTC perpetuals with our trading points program ending October 31st. Same execution speed. Same deep liquidity. Zero trading fees. Welcome to Polynomial "Uptoberfest."

Zero Fee Perps are now LIVE on Polynomial Trade. 0% maker & taker fees on ETH and BTC perpetuals with our trading points program ending October 31st. Same execution speed. Same deep liquidity. Zero trading fees. Welcome to Polynomial "Uptoberfest."

Polynomial

30,313 次观看 • 11 个月前

The evolving lemniscates of a time-choreographed complex polynomial. *DM me if you would like to see the math framework...bots are killing me.

The evolving lemniscates of a time-choreographed complex polynomial. *DM me if you would like to see the math framework...bots are killing me.

Mathelirium

18,318 次观看 • 11 个月前

Polynomial Superchain is live 🟢✨ Stake now at This is a significant milestone in our mission to hyperscale on-chain derivatives trading, and we invite everyone to join us. Details on staking and our points program below 👇

Polynomial Superchain is live 🟢✨ Stake now at This is a significant milestone in our mission to hyperscale on-chain derivatives trading, and we invite everyone to join us. Details on staking and our points program below 👇

Polynomial

120,665 次观看 • 2 年前

The roots of a polynomial aren't just numbers, but a moving geometric field that reacts like a resonant surface in the complex plane. See the description for the animation below

The roots of a polynomial aren't just numbers, but a moving geometric field that reacts like a resonant surface in the complex plane. See the description for the animation below

Mathelirium

23,908 次观看 • 3 个月前

This is how you turn a matrix into a graph:

This is how you turn a matrix into a graph:

Tivadar Danka

68,543 次观看 • 3 年前

#UEFN Scene Graph trick: Teleporting a player with SetGlobalTransform instead of TeleportTo skips the loading screen!!! Today's v38.00 update added a function for retrieving a `fort_character`s Entity which allows for this trick to function!

#UEFN Scene Graph trick: Teleporting a player with SetGlobalTransform instead of TeleportTo skips the loading screen!!! Today's v38.00 update added a function for retrieving a `fort_character`s Entity which allows for this trick to function!

krisp

12,542 次观看 • 10 个月前

$5 billion in volume processed. Over a year live on our chain. Today we're launching Polynomial Fusion - something that doesn't exist anywhere else in crypto. The world's first hybrid orderbook system. Here's why this changes everything 🧵

$5 billion in volume processed. Over a year live on our chain. Today we're launching Polynomial Fusion - something that doesn't exist anywhere else in crypto. The world's first hybrid orderbook system. Here's why this changes everything 🧵

Polynomial

63,102 次观看 • 1 年前

This is obviously a sketch but it's terrifying how real it is.

This is obviously a sketch but it's terrifying how real it is.

Ian Miles Cheong

109,167 次观看 • 3 年前

What happens when you take a polynomial and keep changing its coefficients every frame? You get a resonant root field in the complex plane where clusters, arcs and outer flares form, dissolve, and reappear as the system evolves in time.

What happens when you take a polynomial and keep changing its coefficients every frame? You get a resonant root field in the complex plane where clusters, arcs and outer flares form, dissolve, and reappear as the system evolves in time.

Mathelirium

17,351 次观看 • 3 个月前

What you're seeing here is the root dynamics of a smoothly time-modulated complex polynomial. A living membrane breathes while four satellites orbit, dock, fuse with the core, then split again. From the simplest task in algebra...finding roots...emerges natural-feeling, sophisticated motion. #ComplexPolynomials #ComplexAnalysis #MathArt #Mathematics

What you're seeing here is the root dynamics of a smoothly time-modulated complex polynomial. A living membrane breathes while four satellites orbit, dock, fuse with the core, then split again. From the simplest task in algebra...finding roots...emerges natural-feeling, sophisticated motion. #ComplexPolynomials #ComplexAnalysis #MathArt #Mathematics

Mathelirium

63,283 次观看 • 10 个月前

🎉 The future of decentralized perpetual trading is here ⭐️ Introducing Polynomial Trade featuring 5-10 bps trading fees and deep liquidity for traders 💪 Powered by and Pyth Network 🔮 on @optimismFND 👉

🎉 The future of decentralized perpetual trading is here ⭐️ Introducing Polynomial Trade featuring 5-10 bps trading fees and deep liquidity for traders 💪 Powered by and Pyth Network 🔮 on @optimismFND 👉

Polynomial

362,270 次观看 • 3 年前

The future of onchain perpetuals just expanded beyond crypto. Trade SPX, Gold, Oil, and Forex with up to 20x leverage using your crypto as collateral. Introducing traditional markets on Polynomial. Powered by Pyth Network 🔮

The future of onchain perpetuals just expanded beyond crypto. Trade SPX, Gold, Oil, and Forex with up to 20x leverage using your crypto as collateral. Introducing traditional markets on Polynomial. Powered by Pyth Network 🔮

Polynomial

37,884 次观看 • 10 个月前

This is how the opposition wants the house to "function"

This is how the opposition wants the house to "function"

Political Kida

18,589 次观看 • 7 个月前