Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Hunter Maats on Joe Rogan explaining how Thomas Sowell has spent decades fighting racism — not by denying it exists, but by insisting culture matters more than most people want to admit. Joe Rogan He puts two groups of Black people side by side: West Indians (think Colin Powell)...

sowelleconomics's profile picture

Commentary - Sowell Economics

30,336 subscribers

109,786 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“In the academic world, diversity means black leftists, white leftists, female leftists, and Hispanic leftists. Demographic diversity conceals ideological conformity.” - Thomas Sowell Peter Thiel made the same diagnosis in 1996. He watched universities celebrate racial and gender diversity while systematically stamping out diversity of thought. His point was simple. A campus full of people who look different but think alike is not diverse, it’s just ideological monopoly wearing a costume. Sowell and Thiel were describing the same phenomenon from different angles. Multiculturalism and “diversity” were never the end goal. They were the instrument. The real objective has always been the capture of institutions, universities, corporations, government, culture, and the enforcement of one narrow worldview. Demographic checkboxes were the most effective tool available to achieve that. Once the institutions were staffed and policed by people who already agreed on the fundamentals, dissent became “hate,” disagreement became “harm,” and the old liberal commitment to open inquiry quietly died. The diversity bureaucracy eventually succeeded at what it was actually designed to do. So “the next time some academics tell you how important ‘diversity’ is, ask how many Republicans there are in their sociology department.” - Thomas Sowell
1:51

“In the academic world, diversity means black leftists, white leftists, female leftists, and Hispanic leftists. Demographic diversity conceals ideological conformity.” - Thomas Sowell Peter Thiel made the same diagnosis in 1996. He watched universities celebrate racial and gender diversity while systematically stamping out diversity of thought. His point was simple. A campus full of people who look different but think alike is not diverse, it’s just ideological monopoly wearing a costume. Sowell and Thiel were describing the same phenomenon from different angles. Multiculturalism and “diversity” were never the end goal. They were the instrument. The real objective has always been the capture of institutions, universities, corporations, government, culture, and the enforcement of one narrow worldview. Demographic checkboxes were the most effective tool available to achieve that. Once the institutions were staffed and policed by people who already agreed on the fundamentals, dissent became “hate,” disagreement became “harm,” and the old liberal commitment to open inquiry quietly died. The diversity bureaucracy eventually succeeded at what it was actually designed to do. So “the next time some academics tell you how important ‘diversity’ is, ask how many Republicans there are in their sociology department.” - Thomas Sowell

Rothmus 🏴

103,238 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

When Insurance Was Worth More Than Black Lives One day in 1781, a slave ship's crew threw over 100 Africans overboard to a watery death in the Atlantic Ocean, not by accident, but because British law allowed it, insurance covered it and 143 Africans deaths was an acceptable investment into an insurance scam. The Zong massacre may have taken place over 240 years ago in 1781, but it remains a clear reflection of how the Global North has always valued African lives both historically and to date. As with so many other cases where African lives were wasted for the sake of completely unbridled European greed, recognition of the crime has never been formally established, and no compensation has been given to the African communities on both sides of the Atlantic that were the victims of this crime. The Global North has always placed a relatively low price on the bodies and blood of Africans - a price that has been paid millions of times to feed its imperial economy and build its infrastructure. It still does the same today through the mechanics of neo-colonialism, which enables it to continue taking from Africa to maintain its hegemonic global position. Africa needs to open its eyes to the fact that the imperial Global North has never changed and it remains the real ultimate enemy of African progress.
3:13

When Insurance Was Worth More Than Black Lives One day in 1781, a slave ship's crew threw over 100 Africans overboard to a watery death in the Atlantic Ocean, not by accident, but because British law allowed it, insurance covered it and 143 Africans deaths was an acceptable investment into an insurance scam. The Zong massacre may have taken place over 240 years ago in 1781, but it remains a clear reflection of how the Global North has always valued African lives both historically and to date. As with so many other cases where African lives were wasted for the sake of completely unbridled European greed, recognition of the crime has never been formally established, and no compensation has been given to the African communities on both sides of the Atlantic that were the victims of this crime. The Global North has always placed a relatively low price on the bodies and blood of Africans - a price that has been paid millions of times to feed its imperial economy and build its infrastructure. It still does the same today through the mechanics of neo-colonialism, which enables it to continue taking from Africa to maintain its hegemonic global position. Africa needs to open its eyes to the fact that the imperial Global North has never changed and it remains the real ultimate enemy of African progress.

The Spearhead

37,644 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Joe Rogan blasts far right Republicans for there lack of compassion: “You see that from the right too. The really s***** right wing people that are very dismissive of entire swaths of people and culture and don’t take into consideration the nuance involved in like crime ridden areas, and how those things became that in the first place. All that pull them up by their bootstraps bull****, all that no need for a social safety net stuff, all that like lack of compassion, lack of caring about people, that masquerades as conservatism.” People constantly accuse Rogan of being an alt right influencer, when in reality he is and always has been openly liberal. Some may even go to the extent to say he’s a “radical liberal” when it comes to ideas such as social safety nets in society, which stems from his family growing up on food stamps and unemployment when he was a child. Rogan as of late may criticize the left more than he does the right, but that’s because he feels disenfranchised by the party that he followed his entire life. Do you think of Joe Rogan as being right leaning or left leaning👇🏻
0:35

Joe Rogan blasts far right Republicans for there lack of compassion: “You see that from the right too. The really s***** right wing people that are very dismissive of entire swaths of people and culture and don’t take into consideration the nuance involved in like crime ridden areas, and how those things became that in the first place. All that pull them up by their bootstraps bull****, all that no need for a social safety net stuff, all that like lack of compassion, lack of caring about people, that masquerades as conservatism.” People constantly accuse Rogan of being an alt right influencer, when in reality he is and always has been openly liberal. Some may even go to the extent to say he’s a “radical liberal” when it comes to ideas such as social safety nets in society, which stems from his family growing up on food stamps and unemployment when he was a child. Rogan as of late may criticize the left more than he does the right, but that’s because he feels disenfranchised by the party that he followed his entire life. Do you think of Joe Rogan as being right leaning or left leaning👇🏻

End Tribalism in Politics

914,344 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Alastair Campbell, "This is one of the most extraordinary election victories and comebacks in an election in history" ALASTAIR CAMPBELL "What did Donald Trump get right? He managed tp speak to and for the anger that people feel about the state of their lives, the state of their country" "I think he weaponised it in the usual way, no least helped by Elon Musk" "Not least the way he campaigned.. Which a lot of people find distasteful and unpleasant.. Full of lies, racism and misogyny and so forth" "The Democrats have to look deep to see how they managed to lose this" "Trump has combined populism, polarisation, post truth politics, in a way that has made a lot of people motivated by it, comfortable with it, and feeling that he offers them something the other side doesn't" "This is going to affect politics right across the world.. How do you deliver the kind of lives and progress people want in their lives, but at the same time you don't want to do that kind of politics"
5:20

Alastair Campbell, "This is one of the most extraordinary election victories and comebacks in an election in history" ALASTAIR CAMPBELL "What did Donald Trump get right? He managed tp speak to and for the anger that people feel about the state of their lives, the state of their country" "I think he weaponised it in the usual way, no least helped by Elon Musk" "Not least the way he campaigned.. Which a lot of people find distasteful and unpleasant.. Full of lies, racism and misogyny and so forth" "The Democrats have to look deep to see how they managed to lose this" "Trump has combined populism, polarisation, post truth politics, in a way that has made a lot of people motivated by it, comfortable with it, and feeling that he offers them something the other side doesn't" "This is going to affect politics right across the world.. How do you deliver the kind of lives and progress people want in their lives, but at the same time you don't want to do that kind of politics"

Farrukh

735,862 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Last night (Tuesday), 24 February, at around 8:00 P.M about 20 Israeli settlers raided the village of Khirbet Susiya, in the South Hebron Hills. They attacked homes and cars with stones, and set fire to three tents, a pre-fab, chicken coops and cars at several spots throughout the village. About 300 people live in the village, half of them minors. They are subjected to daily violence by settlers and the military, with the backing of all Israeli state authorities. Footage also shows a group of settlers trying to damage cameras to prevent documentation of the attack. None of the assailants were detained. Yesterday’s attack on Khirbet Susiya is part of Israel’s broader onslaught against Palestinians, who remain defenseless in the face of unchecked violence by militias and the Israeli military. Israel’s ethnic cleansing in the West Bank has so far displaced more than 4,000 Palestinians from their homes, with 51 communities expelled in their entirety and 14 communities in part. The daily violence towards Palestinians in the West Bank continues as Israel maintains a system of military occupation and systemic impunity for settler violence, while the international community stands by.
0:46

Last night (Tuesday), 24 February, at around 8:00 P.M about 20 Israeli settlers raided the village of Khirbet Susiya, in the South Hebron Hills. They attacked homes and cars with stones, and set fire to three tents, a pre-fab, chicken coops and cars at several spots throughout the village. About 300 people live in the village, half of them minors. They are subjected to daily violence by settlers and the military, with the backing of all Israeli state authorities. Footage also shows a group of settlers trying to damage cameras to prevent documentation of the attack. None of the assailants were detained. Yesterday’s attack on Khirbet Susiya is part of Israel’s broader onslaught against Palestinians, who remain defenseless in the face of unchecked violence by militias and the Israeli military. Israel’s ethnic cleansing in the West Bank has so far displaced more than 4,000 Palestinians from their homes, with 51 communities expelled in their entirety and 14 communities in part. The daily violence towards Palestinians in the West Bank continues as Israel maintains a system of military occupation and systemic impunity for settler violence, while the international community stands by.

B'Tselem בצלם بتسيلم

55,128 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

KWAME TURE BLASTS AFRICAN BOURGEOISIE On this day in 1998, Pan-African revolutionary and icon Kwame Ture died in Guinea, Conakry. Born on 29 June 1941, Ture, formerly known as Stokely Carmichael, moved to the United States from Trinidad with his family at 11. He led a life marked by a strong dedication to the Pan-African cause. In his mid-20s, he became chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which primarily focused on organising and mobilising Black people in the US South to exercise their voting rights. He later oversaw SNCC members who co-founded the Lowndes County Freedom Organization, an SNCC affiliate focused on registering Black voters in Lowndes County, Alabama. Ture was at the forefront of this struggle throughout the 1960s, from the Freedom Rides (challenging segregation at bus stops) to the rise of the Black Power Movement. He later helped found the All-African People's Revolutionary Party. The majority of Ture's last three decades were spent in the West African nation of Guinea, a testament to his commitment to Pan-Africanism. Here, he adopted the name ‘Kwame Tureaud in honour of Ghana's founding leader and Pan-African icon Kwame Nkrumah and Guinea's then-president Sékou Touré, two revolutionaries he drew a lot of inspiration from. Despite becoming friends with many African leaders during his time on the continent, Ture never held back from calling out the worst tendencies of the African bourgeoisie. He pointed out that it was essential to understand that not all Africans are on the side of the masses and revolutionaries. In remembrance of this great son of Africa, here is a 1989 clip of him exposing the African bourgeoisie.
2:22

KWAME TURE BLASTS AFRICAN BOURGEOISIE On this day in 1998, Pan-African revolutionary and icon Kwame Ture died in Guinea, Conakry. Born on 29 June 1941, Ture, formerly known as Stokely Carmichael, moved to the United States from Trinidad with his family at 11. He led a life marked by a strong dedication to the Pan-African cause. In his mid-20s, he became chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), which primarily focused on organising and mobilising Black people in the US South to exercise their voting rights. He later oversaw SNCC members who co-founded the Lowndes County Freedom Organization, an SNCC affiliate focused on registering Black voters in Lowndes County, Alabama. Ture was at the forefront of this struggle throughout the 1960s, from the Freedom Rides (challenging segregation at bus stops) to the rise of the Black Power Movement. He later helped found the All-African People's Revolutionary Party. The majority of Ture's last three decades were spent in the West African nation of Guinea, a testament to his commitment to Pan-Africanism. Here, he adopted the name ‘Kwame Tureaud in honour of Ghana's founding leader and Pan-African icon Kwame Nkrumah and Guinea's then-president Sékou Touré, two revolutionaries he drew a lot of inspiration from. Despite becoming friends with many African leaders during his time on the continent, Ture never held back from calling out the worst tendencies of the African bourgeoisie. He pointed out that it was essential to understand that not all Africans are on the side of the masses and revolutionaries. In remembrance of this great son of Africa, here is a 1989 clip of him exposing the African bourgeoisie.

African Stream

36,315 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Let’s kill this lie once and for all: Racism doesn’t come from working-class struggle. To claim the white working class would treat Black and Brown people better if they were economically happier is dishonest. It paints them as thoughtless, incapable of moral choice, and worse, it excuses their racism. Poverty doesn’t create racism; white supremacy does. And blaming hardship is just another way to protect it. If they truly cared about their economic struggle, they’d know what’s in Nigel Farage’s manifesto. They’d see that his policies are a direct assault on their own livelihoods. But they don’t care to know, because racism is the priority, not survival. In the age of the internet, ignorance is a choice. Information is at their fingertips, yet they choose hate over truth, division over solidarity. There are no excuses left. They’re complicit, and it’s time we stop pretending otherwise. White liberals in Britain, including Individuals like Gary Stevenson and others who see themselves as non-racists, or the ‘not all white people’ brigade end up gate keeping the deeply entrenched racism in the UK, this direct attack, this insult to the intelligence of Black and Brown people also shines a light on the extent of implicit racism permeated within Britain as a whole. This protects the very structures that uphold white supremacy. Their ‘white fragility’ exposes the truth: Britain’s racism isn’t confined to the far right. It’s polite, it’s intellectual, it’s middle-class. It hides behind reasoned tones and liberal credentials. And that’s why this country never has an honest conversation about racism, because white people of every class are terrified of what the mirror will show them. The truth is too ugly, and they’d rather rewrite it than face it.
2:13

Let’s kill this lie once and for all: Racism doesn’t come from working-class struggle. To claim the white working class would treat Black and Brown people better if they were economically happier is dishonest. It paints them as thoughtless, incapable of moral choice, and worse, it excuses their racism. Poverty doesn’t create racism; white supremacy does. And blaming hardship is just another way to protect it. If they truly cared about their economic struggle, they’d know what’s in Nigel Farage’s manifesto. They’d see that his policies are a direct assault on their own livelihoods. But they don’t care to know, because racism is the priority, not survival. In the age of the internet, ignorance is a choice. Information is at their fingertips, yet they choose hate over truth, division over solidarity. There are no excuses left. They’re complicit, and it’s time we stop pretending otherwise. White liberals in Britain, including Individuals like Gary Stevenson and others who see themselves as non-racists, or the ‘not all white people’ brigade end up gate keeping the deeply entrenched racism in the UK, this direct attack, this insult to the intelligence of Black and Brown people also shines a light on the extent of implicit racism permeated within Britain as a whole. This protects the very structures that uphold white supremacy. Their ‘white fragility’ exposes the truth: Britain’s racism isn’t confined to the far right. It’s polite, it’s intellectual, it’s middle-class. It hides behind reasoned tones and liberal credentials. And that’s why this country never has an honest conversation about racism, because white people of every class are terrified of what the mirror will show them. The truth is too ugly, and they’d rather rewrite it than face it.

Save Our Citizenships 🔻

12,075 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”
2:29

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

Arjun Khemani

10,523 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

One of the biggest lies taught across all American schools and universities is that whites imposed slavery upon blacks. We need powerful politicians, Trump et. al. to make the following points in a press conference: 1 - Slavery was deeply embedded in African societies throughout history. The blacks that whites bought were already enslaved by blacks. 2 - The Portuguese, British, French, Spanish, and Dutch purchased ENSLAVED Africans from African coastal kingdoms, which had captured blacks from the interior through wars and raids. 2.1 - African elites and tribes, such as the Ashanti, Dahomey, and Yoruba, profited by selling black captives to Europeans. 3 - The Arab-Muslim slave trade was longer-lasting than the European transatlantic trade, and more brutal, with higher mortality rates (up to 80% on some routes) due to castration of males and harsh marches in the Sahara Desert. 3.1 - The Muslim trade spanned the 7th-20th centuries. In this case, the Muslims DID NOT buy enslaved blacks but captured blacks, enslaved them, and then transported them across the Sahara Desert and the Indian Ocean (East African route) to the Islamic world. 3.2 - Historians estimate that during the Muslim trade 17 million Africans were enslaved and transported over 1,300 years --- whereas 6-10 million were transported by Europeans across the Atlantic. 4 - Whites and Christians were responsible for abolishing BOTH the brutal Muslim and the African slave trades. 4.1 - In fact, European colonialists, along with missionary influences, played a key role in the formal abolition of slavery in Africa during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. 4.2 - White benevolent colonial powers (Britain, France, Portugal) began abolishing slavery in their African territories in the early 1800s. Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807 and slavery in its empire in 1833. 4.3 - Britain pressured African colonies and African elites to abolish their slave raids. The Africans wanted to continue enslaving other Africans because Africans had no conception of freedom but view each other as objects. 4.4 - The British, in stark contrast, acted according to exclusively White humanitarian ideals and concept of human freedom. France similarly abolished slavery in its West African territories by 1905. 5 - Muslims wanted to continue the slave trade. Islam has no concept of human freedom and lacks humanitarian mercy and compassion. 6 - Christian missionaries, particularly from Britain and France, advocated for abolition, viewing slavery as morally incompatible with Christian values. They established missions and schools to resettle freed slaves and spread anti-slavery ideology. 6.1 - If it were not for White compassion and freedom values, Muslims and Africans would have likely continued their slave trades forever. 7 - The "Barbary slave trade", conducted by North African corsairs (from Algiers, Tunis, Tripoli, and Morocco) between 1530 and 1830 involved the capture and enslavement of FREE Europeans. Around 1.25 million Europeans were enslaved by Barbary pirates between 1530 and 1830. 7.1 - The Barbary pirates were Muslims acting under the auspices of Ottomans in control of Algiers, Tunis, Tripoli. 7.2 - This trade ended because White Christians compelled Muslims to end it through British and French bombardments of Algiers. The French had to conquer the barbaric Algiers in 1830 to effectively end large-scale Barbary piracy.
1:02

One of the biggest lies taught across all American schools and universities is that whites imposed slavery upon blacks. We need powerful politicians, Trump et. al. to make the following points in a press conference: 1 - Slavery was deeply embedded in African societies throughout history. The blacks that whites bought were already enslaved by blacks. 2 - The Portuguese, British, French, Spanish, and Dutch purchased ENSLAVED Africans from African coastal kingdoms, which had captured blacks from the interior through wars and raids. 2.1 - African elites and tribes, such as the Ashanti, Dahomey, and Yoruba, profited by selling black captives to Europeans. 3 - The Arab-Muslim slave trade was longer-lasting than the European transatlantic trade, and more brutal, with higher mortality rates (up to 80% on some routes) due to castration of males and harsh marches in the Sahara Desert. 3.1 - The Muslim trade spanned the 7th-20th centuries. In this case, the Muslims DID NOT buy enslaved blacks but captured blacks, enslaved them, and then transported them across the Sahara Desert and the Indian Ocean (East African route) to the Islamic world. 3.2 - Historians estimate that during the Muslim trade 17 million Africans were enslaved and transported over 1,300 years --- whereas 6-10 million were transported by Europeans across the Atlantic. 4 - Whites and Christians were responsible for abolishing BOTH the brutal Muslim and the African slave trades. 4.1 - In fact, European colonialists, along with missionary influences, played a key role in the formal abolition of slavery in Africa during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. 4.2 - White benevolent colonial powers (Britain, France, Portugal) began abolishing slavery in their African territories in the early 1800s. Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807 and slavery in its empire in 1833. 4.3 - Britain pressured African colonies and African elites to abolish their slave raids. The Africans wanted to continue enslaving other Africans because Africans had no conception of freedom but view each other as objects. 4.4 - The British, in stark contrast, acted according to exclusively White humanitarian ideals and concept of human freedom. France similarly abolished slavery in its West African territories by 1905. 5 - Muslims wanted to continue the slave trade. Islam has no concept of human freedom and lacks humanitarian mercy and compassion. 6 - Christian missionaries, particularly from Britain and France, advocated for abolition, viewing slavery as morally incompatible with Christian values. They established missions and schools to resettle freed slaves and spread anti-slavery ideology. 6.1 - If it were not for White compassion and freedom values, Muslims and Africans would have likely continued their slave trades forever. 7 - The "Barbary slave trade", conducted by North African corsairs (from Algiers, Tunis, Tripoli, and Morocco) between 1530 and 1830 involved the capture and enslavement of FREE Europeans. Around 1.25 million Europeans were enslaved by Barbary pirates between 1530 and 1830. 7.1 - The Barbary pirates were Muslims acting under the auspices of Ottomans in control of Algiers, Tunis, Tripoli. 7.2 - This trade ended because White Christians compelled Muslims to end it through British and French bombardments of Algiers. The French had to conquer the barbaric Algiers in 1830 to effectively end large-scale Barbary piracy.

Dr. Ricardo Duchesne

82,250 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!
4:13

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!

Hotep Jesus

34,741 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Konstantin Kisin made a point that cuts to the heart of one of the most forbidden conversations in the West today. He argued that much of our current cultural tension stems from an unspoken assumption: that all groups of people are not just equal in dignity and rights, but essentially the same in their aptitudes and outcomes. When reality shows persistent group differences — whether in sports, professions, or other fields — we’re left scrambling for explanations that avoid cultural or, God forbid, genetic factors. Kisin referenced Thomas Sowell’s observation that different groups naturally excel in different areas: Germans dominating global brewing (including China’s Tsingtao), Latinos overrepresented in baseball, white people in hockey, Black people in the NBA. These patterns, he says, are the normal human condition, not evidence of systemic failure. The problem arises, he suggests, when a society insists that any deviation from perfect uniformity must be explained by oppression or discrimination, rather than accepting that people and groups simply differ in strengths and interests. It’s a provocative take on why honest discussion about group differences has become so difficult. What do you think — are group differences in outcomes mostly cultural and environmental, or do we need to be more open to the possibility that biology and natural aptitudes also play a role?
1:08

Konstantin Kisin made a point that cuts to the heart of one of the most forbidden conversations in the West today. He argued that much of our current cultural tension stems from an unspoken assumption: that all groups of people are not just equal in dignity and rights, but essentially the same in their aptitudes and outcomes. When reality shows persistent group differences — whether in sports, professions, or other fields — we’re left scrambling for explanations that avoid cultural or, God forbid, genetic factors. Kisin referenced Thomas Sowell’s observation that different groups naturally excel in different areas: Germans dominating global brewing (including China’s Tsingtao), Latinos overrepresented in baseball, white people in hockey, Black people in the NBA. These patterns, he says, are the normal human condition, not evidence of systemic failure. The problem arises, he suggests, when a society insists that any deviation from perfect uniformity must be explained by oppression or discrimination, rather than accepting that people and groups simply differ in strengths and interests. It’s a provocative take on why honest discussion about group differences has become so difficult. What do you think — are group differences in outcomes mostly cultural and environmental, or do we need to be more open to the possibility that biology and natural aptitudes also play a role?

Camus

219,568 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Nelson Mandela On Why He Supported Gaddafi And Castro In 1948, a right-wing party rose to power in South Africa, led by the country’s white minority. What followed was a decades-long period of systemic violence against South Africa's black majority. This period, known as apartheid, ended in 1994 with the victory of the revolutionary African National Congress (ANC) party, and the election of its 27-years imprisoned activist Nelson Mandela (1918 - 2013) as South Africa’s first freely-elected president. During the decades of struggle, the ANC had sought help from the international community. The “free” nations of the West would not help. The United States and Britain would not help. Only “undemocratic” nations like Libya, Cuba and Palestine answered the call, providing military, medical and financial assistance to the anti-apartheid forces. In this interview with PBS News in the year of his release from prison, Nelson Mandela defends his support of Cuban leader Fidel Castro and Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in the face of allegations of “human rights abuses” leveled against the governments of both leaders by the West - the same West which for so long had so little to say about the very real human rights abuses perpetrated by the apartheid government, and which actively supported apartheid.
1:53

Nelson Mandela On Why He Supported Gaddafi And Castro In 1948, a right-wing party rose to power in South Africa, led by the country’s white minority. What followed was a decades-long period of systemic violence against South Africa's black majority. This period, known as apartheid, ended in 1994 with the victory of the revolutionary African National Congress (ANC) party, and the election of its 27-years imprisoned activist Nelson Mandela (1918 - 2013) as South Africa’s first freely-elected president. During the decades of struggle, the ANC had sought help from the international community. The “free” nations of the West would not help. The United States and Britain would not help. Only “undemocratic” nations like Libya, Cuba and Palestine answered the call, providing military, medical and financial assistance to the anti-apartheid forces. In this interview with PBS News in the year of his release from prison, Nelson Mandela defends his support of Cuban leader Fidel Castro and Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in the face of allegations of “human rights abuses” leveled against the governments of both leaders by the West - the same West which for so long had so little to say about the very real human rights abuses perpetrated by the apartheid government, and which actively supported apartheid.

The Spearhead

11,164 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

New: Joe Rogan is in total disbelief after producer Jamie and comedian Ali Siddiq reveal the truth about sports betting and how NBA players like Malik Beasley are facing up to 20 years in federal prison for throwing games to pay off massive gambling debts: ROGAN: “This is going to result in people ending up dead. There’s real people who bet on the losing side of these games that were fixed.” JAMIE: “A lot of them have to do with player props where these guys might just try really hard to get extra rebounds.” ROGAN: “Wait a minute that just means he was playing well. What’s wrong with that?” JAMIE: “The other one he fixed the spread by sprinting down the court to score with 3 seconds left when they were down by 10.” ROGAN: “He’s just scoring though why would anybody question that?” SIDDIQ: “Joe you’re down by 10 and there’s 5 seconds left in the game. The game is over. Who tries that hard to lose by 8 instead. The point spread was 8.5.” ROGAN: “F*ck you I want that ball in the net. It just means you’re competitive to the end. It’s not like he’s missing on purpose.” SIDDIQ: “Joe all of the starters were out of the game.” ROGAN: “Aside from the legal system, sports betting has been the most crooked aspect of the human race in the past 100 years.”
5:13

New: Joe Rogan is in total disbelief after producer Jamie and comedian Ali Siddiq reveal the truth about sports betting and how NBA players like Malik Beasley are facing up to 20 years in federal prison for throwing games to pay off massive gambling debts: ROGAN: “This is going to result in people ending up dead. There’s real people who bet on the losing side of these games that were fixed.” JAMIE: “A lot of them have to do with player props where these guys might just try really hard to get extra rebounds.” ROGAN: “Wait a minute that just means he was playing well. What’s wrong with that?” JAMIE: “The other one he fixed the spread by sprinting down the court to score with 3 seconds left when they were down by 10.” ROGAN: “He’s just scoring though why would anybody question that?” SIDDIQ: “Joe you’re down by 10 and there’s 5 seconds left in the game. The game is over. Who tries that hard to lose by 8 instead. The point spread was 8.5.” ROGAN: “F*ck you I want that ball in the net. It just means you’re competitive to the end. It’s not like he’s missing on purpose.” SIDDIQ: “Joe all of the starters were out of the game.” ROGAN: “Aside from the legal system, sports betting has been the most crooked aspect of the human race in the past 100 years.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

287,798 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THE MYTH THAT AFRICANS ‘SOLD THEIR PEOPLE’ Europeans have attempted to distance themselves from - and avoid accountability for - their atrocities during the centuries-long slave trade by propelling narratives that it was Africans who sold them slaves. On this version, Africans share the blame for the horrors faced by Black people. During his opening remarks on African identity and the decolonisation of education in Africa and the Caribbean at the University of West Indies in Jamaica, at the PJ Patterson Institute for Africa Caribbean Advocacy, vice chancellor Hilary Beckles spoke about the importance of reclaiming our narratives. As Beckles puts it, when history is told from the gunman's perspective, you inevitably get a distorted picture. Beckles dispels the myth that Africans willingly sold their fellow Africans into slavery. While he notes that there were certainly corrupt individuals back then, just as there are now, they were a minority. In Nazi Germany, for example, there were Jewish people who collaborated with the regime, yet no one blames them for the Holocaust. So why is this the line of argument used when it comes to slavery? Most Africans who took part in the slave trade did so for survival and did not have much of a choice. When European narratives paint our ancestors as 'business partners,' it is misleading - a business partner is free to not partake in a business venture without consequences, whereas Africans were not. Moreover, Europeans exacerbated divisions amongst our people, spurring ethnic conflict and wars amongst Africans. It was often ‘prisoners of war’ who were bought by Europeans from Africans. The European narrative has been used to further divide Black people across the world, thus continuing the divide-and-conquer tactics that have ensured African disunity and exploitation for centuries.
2:53

THE MYTH THAT AFRICANS ‘SOLD THEIR PEOPLE’ Europeans have attempted to distance themselves from - and avoid accountability for - their atrocities during the centuries-long slave trade by propelling narratives that it was Africans who sold them slaves. On this version, Africans share the blame for the horrors faced by Black people. During his opening remarks on African identity and the decolonisation of education in Africa and the Caribbean at the University of West Indies in Jamaica, at the PJ Patterson Institute for Africa Caribbean Advocacy, vice chancellor Hilary Beckles spoke about the importance of reclaiming our narratives. As Beckles puts it, when history is told from the gunman's perspective, you inevitably get a distorted picture. Beckles dispels the myth that Africans willingly sold their fellow Africans into slavery. While he notes that there were certainly corrupt individuals back then, just as there are now, they were a minority. In Nazi Germany, for example, there were Jewish people who collaborated with the regime, yet no one blames them for the Holocaust. So why is this the line of argument used when it comes to slavery? Most Africans who took part in the slave trade did so for survival and did not have much of a choice. When European narratives paint our ancestors as 'business partners,' it is misleading - a business partner is free to not partake in a business venture without consequences, whereas Africans were not. Moreover, Europeans exacerbated divisions amongst our people, spurring ethnic conflict and wars amongst Africans. It was often ‘prisoners of war’ who were bought by Europeans from Africans. The European narrative has been used to further divide Black people across the world, thus continuing the divide-and-conquer tactics that have ensured African disunity and exploitation for centuries.

African Stream

21,566 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Masahiro Shinoda explains why it was impossible for the Jesuits to impose their religion in Japan: "Interviewer: Is 'Silence' (1971) critical of the very fact of the Catholics coming to Japan and imposing an alien culture on the Japanese? Shinoda: Japan is an island surrounded by the sea. Many cultures from outside have come here. Japan could not refuse them. The sea current itself conveyed these foreigners to Japan’s southern shores. Japan’s culture thus consists of many, many foreign cultures in a mixture. Sometimes it caused us to lose our essential Japanese culture. I’m not even sure sometimes what Japanese culture is. In the sixteenth century Christianity and the gun were introduced into Japan. The introduction of the gun was a traumatic event and had a much deeper impact than did Christianity. The Japanese people were perplexed, but they are a realistic people and they made their choices pragmatically, giving up the metaphysical. We are empiricists, materialists. Interviewer: If I had made that movie, I would have questioned the right of the Jesuit priests to come to Japan and impose their ideas on the Japanese. Shinoda: No, it was impossible for the Jesuits to impose their religion on the Japanese because of the animism believed in by this insular, island people. It was not to be destroyed by so severe a religion as Christianity. Christianity destroyed the Roman gods, but the Japanese gods were protected by the softness of Buddhism. Buddhism is so soft that it was absorbed into the Japanese culture of the time. The Japanese people believed that Buddhism could easily marry with Shinto, and thus Japanese culture is a mixed breed of both religions. Then Christianity came, but by this time the native animism of Shinto and Buddhism were already coexisting in harmony. I think that there was no room for an additional religion. All Eastern religions are in accordance with a belief in the oneness of man and nature, whereas Christianity deals with the relationship between one man and another. When movies, or film culture, were introduced into Japan they were already based on modern Western thought. But Japanese culture influenced the kind of films that would be made here, despite the Western origins of the cinema. I must categorize the films of the world into three distinct types. European films are based upon human psychology, American films upon action and the struggles of human beings, and Japanese films upon circumstance." ('Voices from the Japanese Cinema', Joan Mellen, 1975)
1:22

Masahiro Shinoda explains why it was impossible for the Jesuits to impose their religion in Japan: "Interviewer: Is 'Silence' (1971) critical of the very fact of the Catholics coming to Japan and imposing an alien culture on the Japanese? Shinoda: Japan is an island surrounded by the sea. Many cultures from outside have come here. Japan could not refuse them. The sea current itself conveyed these foreigners to Japan’s southern shores. Japan’s culture thus consists of many, many foreign cultures in a mixture. Sometimes it caused us to lose our essential Japanese culture. I’m not even sure sometimes what Japanese culture is. In the sixteenth century Christianity and the gun were introduced into Japan. The introduction of the gun was a traumatic event and had a much deeper impact than did Christianity. The Japanese people were perplexed, but they are a realistic people and they made their choices pragmatically, giving up the metaphysical. We are empiricists, materialists. Interviewer: If I had made that movie, I would have questioned the right of the Jesuit priests to come to Japan and impose their ideas on the Japanese. Shinoda: No, it was impossible for the Jesuits to impose their religion on the Japanese because of the animism believed in by this insular, island people. It was not to be destroyed by so severe a religion as Christianity. Christianity destroyed the Roman gods, but the Japanese gods were protected by the softness of Buddhism. Buddhism is so soft that it was absorbed into the Japanese culture of the time. The Japanese people believed that Buddhism could easily marry with Shinto, and thus Japanese culture is a mixed breed of both religions. Then Christianity came, but by this time the native animism of Shinto and Buddhism were already coexisting in harmony. I think that there was no room for an additional religion. All Eastern religions are in accordance with a belief in the oneness of man and nature, whereas Christianity deals with the relationship between one man and another. When movies, or film culture, were introduced into Japan they were already based on modern Western thought. But Japanese culture influenced the kind of films that would be made here, despite the Western origins of the cinema. I must categorize the films of the world into three distinct types. European films are based upon human psychology, American films upon action and the struggles of human beings, and Japanese films upon circumstance." ('Voices from the Japanese Cinema', Joan Mellen, 1975)

DepressedBergman

3,902,851 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I've spent years carefully tiptoeing around white fragility on the right, but it's time to move on. Some of these people are completely falling apart and are exhibiting left-wing behaviour by embracing identity politics and pathetic, unfounded grievances based on racial hatred. Even people I've highly respected in the past are now outright racists, no longer standing firm on the principles or values that once defined conservatism and the right. They remind me of the same behaviours exhibited by delusional racists in the developing world, who have held these nations back from achieving greatness by bending the knee to identitarian nonsense. What's most concerning for me is that this weakness on the right driven by these emotional, ego-fuelled victim is being exploited by the left, and even more so by immigrant groups with agendas that do not align with the West. These groups have powerful allies across all areas of our society, most prominently the majority of other white people. I've always been concerned about these immigrant groups and their embrace of far-left ideology. We need to challenge their growing power and influence in a meaningful way, because it's clear they are in control but it's also clear to me that the number of people on the right who are willing to do so as a unified bloc is shrinking.
3:48

I've spent years carefully tiptoeing around white fragility on the right, but it's time to move on. Some of these people are completely falling apart and are exhibiting left-wing behaviour by embracing identity politics and pathetic, unfounded grievances based on racial hatred. Even people I've highly respected in the past are now outright racists, no longer standing firm on the principles or values that once defined conservatism and the right. They remind me of the same behaviours exhibited by delusional racists in the developing world, who have held these nations back from achieving greatness by bending the knee to identitarian nonsense. What's most concerning for me is that this weakness on the right driven by these emotional, ego-fuelled victim is being exploited by the left, and even more so by immigrant groups with agendas that do not align with the West. These groups have powerful allies across all areas of our society, most prominently the majority of other white people. I've always been concerned about these immigrant groups and their embrace of far-left ideology. We need to challenge their growing power and influence in a meaningful way, because it's clear they are in control but it's also clear to me that the number of people on the right who are willing to do so as a unified bloc is shrinking.

Rukshan Fernando

211,847 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten