Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

"Hybrid training" refers to a training method that simultaneously develops two opposing elements: "strength" and "endurance." It was once believed that aerobic exercise would cause muscle loss, but today, this style, which combines powerful power and high stamina through a scientific approach, is attracting attention. His performance can be... show more

knockout☆

38,996 subscribers

37,471 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

An intense two-year exercise regimen, gradually increasing to 5–6 hours per week, reversed up to 20 years of age-related structural changes and stiffness in the hearts of sedentary 50-year-olds This is the protocol, totaling 5-6 hours per week, that Dr. Benjamin Levine and colleagues utilized: • Norwegian 4x4 interval training (once a week, later increasing to twice a week, and eventually going back to just once weekly) • Light aerobic activity on recovery days (on days following interval training sessions, participants engaged in light exercises lasting 20 to 30 minutes ) • Endurance base building (an hour-long, or longer, endurance session and a 30-minute base pace session each week) • Strength training sessions twice weekly Exercise is indeed medicine

An intense two-year exercise regimen, gradually increasing to 5–6 hours per week, reversed up to 20 years of age-related structural changes and stiffness in the hearts of sedentary 50-year-olds This is the protocol, totaling 5-6 hours per week, that Dr. Benjamin Levine and colleagues utilized: • Norwegian 4x4 interval training (once a week, later increasing to twice a week, and eventually going back to just once weekly) • Light aerobic activity on recovery days (on days following interval training sessions, participants engaged in light exercises lasting 20 to 30 minutes ) • Endurance base building (an hour-long, or longer, endurance session and a 30-minute base pace session each week) • Strength training sessions twice weekly Exercise is indeed medicine

FoundMyFitness Clips

259,458 views • 1 year ago

A person asks Sadhguru, “How much weight training exercise do you recommend?” And Sadhguru answers, “Weight training is not useful, but do 25-50 Surya-Namaskars, it is complete exercise.” First of all, I am not sure why anyone would ask someone like Sadhguru, who is most of the time, in another dimension, a question on exercise and weight training. And secondly, Sadhguru is just plain wrong. Weight (or strength) training is one of the most important aspects of exercise regimen you can include in your daily or 3-4 times a week physical activity because there is great science behind its benefits. I advise my obese or sarcopenic (very poor muscle mass in advanced liver disease) patients to include weight training to improve clinical outcomes. The highest level of scientific evidence showed that standard muscle-strengthening activities were associated with lower risk of death in patients with non-communicable diseases – including cardiovascular disease, diabetes and lung cancer. Another metanalysis showed strong evidence for a considerable risk reduction of strength training for 60 minutes a week, on all-cause death (−15%), cardiovascular disease death (−19%), and cancer death (−14%). See here: here Sadhguru says the older we get, the better we do not weight train. He is again absolutely wrong. The findings of another systematic review/metanalysis support power (strength) training as an effective therapeutic intervention for improving physical function in adults diagnosed with frailty (poor physical function in old age) and patients with chronic medical conditions. See here: In fact, another study on strength training, this one again a metanalysis, concluded that strength training interventions can be used as a non-drug treatment for hypertension (!), as they promote significant decreases in blood pressure. See here: Strength training also reduces significantly, chronic inflammation as shown in another high quality systematic review and meta-analysis. See here: Resistance/Strength training improved muscle mass and muscle strength, thereby improving performance status. Improved performance status is a wonderful benchmark for an active and healthy life. See here: Even in fatty liver disease, independent of weight loss, exercise training was associated with 3 and a half times more meaningful treatment response towards lowering liver fat. Strength training is a powerful tool to maintain liver health. See here: and here Now Surya Namaskar. Surya Namaskar or Sun Salutation is a sequence of around twelve yoga poses connected by jumping or stretching movements, varying somewhat between various Yoga schools – which means, it has no regulation or standardization unlike weight training. In Iyengar Yoga there is a way, in Ashtanga Vinayasa Yoga there is Type A and B and there are other types followed by other schools or Yoga teachers. Along with the stretching and jumping, which is done is a slow and steady manner, the practice includes chanting a “mantra” calling out twelve names of the Sun God. In its classical form, Surya Namaskar is not an exercise, and is not aerobic. The energy cost of exercise is measured in units of metabolic equivalent of task (MET). Less than 3 METs counts as light exercise; 3 to 6 METs is moderate; 6 or over is vigorous. American College of Sports Medicine and American Heart Association guidelines count periods of at least 10 minutes of moderate MET level activity towards their recommended daily amounts of exercise. For healthy adults aged 18 to 65, the guidelines recommend moderate exercise for 30 minutes five days a week, or vigorous aerobic exercise for 20 minutes three days a week. Surya Namaskar in its classical form has a measly 2.9 METs and in its rigorous form (some people perform mutated highly active forms of Surya Namaskar to make it feel like an exercise) can go up to 7.4 METs – which requires a lot of jumping and little stretching and no time to chant the Sun God names - does not even come close to strength training by any margin. Those who are part of the Surya Namaskar and Yoga cult would provide anecdotal experiences on its benefits (please see comment section) through non-classical forms and would call it an “exhilarating experience.” Experiences are not scientific, evidence are. Many Yoga journals and some dubious and third rate Ayurveda journals have also have published on such experiences in small group of patients, which are not validated or published in better journals [like this junk here: There are no metanalysis level data to prove effectiveness of Surya Namaskar as beneficial as aerobic exercise or better than strength training as Sadhguru claims. Do Surya namaskar if you are doing nothing. But upgrade to strength training if you want something. And stop listening to pseudoscience peddlers who speak religion and culture for your healthcare needs. Sadhguru suffers seriously from Dunning Kruger fallacy: a type of cognitive bias, where people with little expertise or ability assume they have superior expertise or ability. This overestimation occurs because of the fact that they don’t have enough knowledge to know they don’t have enough knowledge.

A person asks Sadhguru, “How much weight training exercise do you recommend?” And Sadhguru answers, “Weight training is not useful, but do 25-50 Surya-Namaskars, it is complete exercise.” First of all, I am not sure why anyone would ask someone like Sadhguru, who is most of the time, in another dimension, a question on exercise and weight training. And secondly, Sadhguru is just plain wrong. Weight (or strength) training is one of the most important aspects of exercise regimen you can include in your daily or 3-4 times a week physical activity because there is great science behind its benefits. I advise my obese or sarcopenic (very poor muscle mass in advanced liver disease) patients to include weight training to improve clinical outcomes. The highest level of scientific evidence showed that standard muscle-strengthening activities were associated with lower risk of death in patients with non-communicable diseases – including cardiovascular disease, diabetes and lung cancer. Another metanalysis showed strong evidence for a considerable risk reduction of strength training for 60 minutes a week, on all-cause death (−15%), cardiovascular disease death (−19%), and cancer death (−14%). See here: here Sadhguru says the older we get, the better we do not weight train. He is again absolutely wrong. The findings of another systematic review/metanalysis support power (strength) training as an effective therapeutic intervention for improving physical function in adults diagnosed with frailty (poor physical function in old age) and patients with chronic medical conditions. See here: In fact, another study on strength training, this one again a metanalysis, concluded that strength training interventions can be used as a non-drug treatment for hypertension (!), as they promote significant decreases in blood pressure. See here: Strength training also reduces significantly, chronic inflammation as shown in another high quality systematic review and meta-analysis. See here: Resistance/Strength training improved muscle mass and muscle strength, thereby improving performance status. Improved performance status is a wonderful benchmark for an active and healthy life. See here: Even in fatty liver disease, independent of weight loss, exercise training was associated with 3 and a half times more meaningful treatment response towards lowering liver fat. Strength training is a powerful tool to maintain liver health. See here: and here Now Surya Namaskar. Surya Namaskar or Sun Salutation is a sequence of around twelve yoga poses connected by jumping or stretching movements, varying somewhat between various Yoga schools – which means, it has no regulation or standardization unlike weight training. In Iyengar Yoga there is a way, in Ashtanga Vinayasa Yoga there is Type A and B and there are other types followed by other schools or Yoga teachers. Along with the stretching and jumping, which is done is a slow and steady manner, the practice includes chanting a “mantra” calling out twelve names of the Sun God. In its classical form, Surya Namaskar is not an exercise, and is not aerobic. The energy cost of exercise is measured in units of metabolic equivalent of task (MET). Less than 3 METs counts as light exercise; 3 to 6 METs is moderate; 6 or over is vigorous. American College of Sports Medicine and American Heart Association guidelines count periods of at least 10 minutes of moderate MET level activity towards their recommended daily amounts of exercise. For healthy adults aged 18 to 65, the guidelines recommend moderate exercise for 30 minutes five days a week, or vigorous aerobic exercise for 20 minutes three days a week. Surya Namaskar in its classical form has a measly 2.9 METs and in its rigorous form (some people perform mutated highly active forms of Surya Namaskar to make it feel like an exercise) can go up to 7.4 METs – which requires a lot of jumping and little stretching and no time to chant the Sun God names - does not even come close to strength training by any margin. Those who are part of the Surya Namaskar and Yoga cult would provide anecdotal experiences on its benefits (please see comment section) through non-classical forms and would call it an “exhilarating experience.” Experiences are not scientific, evidence are. Many Yoga journals and some dubious and third rate Ayurveda journals have also have published on such experiences in small group of patients, which are not validated or published in better journals [like this junk here: There are no metanalysis level data to prove effectiveness of Surya Namaskar as beneficial as aerobic exercise or better than strength training as Sadhguru claims. Do Surya namaskar if you are doing nothing. But upgrade to strength training if you want something. And stop listening to pseudoscience peddlers who speak religion and culture for your healthcare needs. Sadhguru suffers seriously from Dunning Kruger fallacy: a type of cognitive bias, where people with little expertise or ability assume they have superior expertise or ability. This overestimation occurs because of the fact that they don’t have enough knowledge to know they don’t have enough knowledge.

TheLiverDoc™

505,792 views • 2 years ago

He used to be a mischievous boy with a cute expression, but in the time since I last saw him, he has grown into a fine young man💪😁✨ Thanks to relentless training and a strict diet, his physique has improved dramatically; he has even competed in tournaments this season🏋️‍♂️💦🥦🍳🥇 I believe the secret to his growth lies in the fact that he genuinely enjoys his training🤸‍♂️🎶 It also seems that occasionally treating himself to sweets plays an important role😋🍰🍩

He used to be a mischievous boy with a cute expression, but in the time since I last saw him, he has grown into a fine young man💪😁✨ Thanks to relentless training and a strict diet, his physique has improved dramatically; he has even competed in tournaments this season🏋️‍♂️💦🥦🍳🥇 I believe the secret to his growth lies in the fact that he genuinely enjoys his training🤸‍♂️🎶 It also seems that occasionally treating himself to sweets plays an important role😋🍰🍩

knockout☆

24,001 views • 3 days ago

Reminder 💡 You should be training with high intent in season! Build a high chronic training volume in the off-season, then taper back volume during the season. Maintain residuals with high intensity, and work to manage fatigue… but do so in a way that avoids detraining. The catch 22 is that training in season is not always straightforward or optimal, but it is the best way to maintain performance, and mitigate risk of injury. Simple, not easy. #ThePowerHouse | #GeauxTigers 🐅

Reminder 💡 You should be training with high intent in season! Build a high chronic training volume in the off-season, then taper back volume during the season. Maintain residuals with high intensity, and work to manage fatigue… but do so in a way that avoids detraining. The catch 22 is that training in season is not always straightforward or optimal, but it is the best way to maintain performance, and mitigate risk of injury. Simple, not easy. #ThePowerHouse | #GeauxTigers 🐅

Chris Martin

78,860 views • 1 year ago

"One of the very confusing things about the models right now: how to reconcile the fact that they are doing so well on evals. And you look at the evals and you go, 'Those are pretty hard evals.' But the economic impact seems to be dramatically behind. There is [a possible] explanation. Back when people were doing pre-training, the question of what data to train on was answered, because that answer was everything. So you don't have to think if it's going to be this data or that data. When people do RL training, they say, 'Okay, we want to have this kind of RL training for this thing and that kind of RL training for that thing.' You say, 'Hey, I would love our model to do really well when we release it. I want the evals to look great. What would be RL training that could help on this task?' If you combine this with generalization of the models actually being inadequate, that has the potential to explain a lot of what we are seeing, this disconnect between eval performance and actual real-world performance"

"One of the very confusing things about the models right now: how to reconcile the fact that they are doing so well on evals. And you look at the evals and you go, 'Those are pretty hard evals.' But the economic impact seems to be dramatically behind. There is [a possible] explanation. Back when people were doing pre-training, the question of what data to train on was answered, because that answer was everything. So you don't have to think if it's going to be this data or that data. When people do RL training, they say, 'Okay, we want to have this kind of RL training for this thing and that kind of RL training for that thing.' You say, 'Hey, I would love our model to do really well when we release it. I want the evals to look great. What would be RL training that could help on this task?' If you combine this with generalization of the models actually being inadequate, that has the potential to explain a lot of what we are seeing, this disconnect between eval performance and actual real-world performance"

Dwarkesh Patel

502,060 views • 7 months ago

Muscle strength is arguably one of the most important predictors of healthspan and longevity—far more than muscle mass alone. Low muscle strength is associated with a 50% higher risk of early death. The good news is that strength can be regained at any age through resistance training, even in your 90s. One study showed that 90-year-old participants increased their strength by 174%, walking speed by 48%, and thigh muscle mass by 9% after just 8 weeks of high-intensity resistance training (PMID: 2342214). This highlights that age-related strength loss is primarily a reversible decline in muscle quality—not just lost muscle mass. But there’s another key piece: protein. For older adults, consuming about 1.6g/kg of body weight in protein daily has been shown to maximize gains in both muscle strength and mass. Combining resistance training with adequate protein intake is a game-changer for improving biological resilience, mobility, and overall quality of life as we age. I cover all this and more in Episode 97: The Science of Protein. It’s a must-watch for anyone looking to improve their health or help loved ones do the same. Watch Episode 97 now:

Muscle strength is arguably one of the most important predictors of healthspan and longevity—far more than muscle mass alone. Low muscle strength is associated with a 50% higher risk of early death. The good news is that strength can be regained at any age through resistance training, even in your 90s. One study showed that 90-year-old participants increased their strength by 174%, walking speed by 48%, and thigh muscle mass by 9% after just 8 weeks of high-intensity resistance training (PMID: 2342214). This highlights that age-related strength loss is primarily a reversible decline in muscle quality—not just lost muscle mass. But there’s another key piece: protein. For older adults, consuming about 1.6g/kg of body weight in protein daily has been shown to maximize gains in both muscle strength and mass. Combining resistance training with adequate protein intake is a game-changer for improving biological resilience, mobility, and overall quality of life as we age. I cover all this and more in Episode 97: The Science of Protein. It’s a must-watch for anyone looking to improve their health or help loved ones do the same. Watch Episode 97 now:

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

83,710 views • 1 year ago

doyoung sang park hyoshin's wild flower up close in front of the training noona when he was a trainee 🐯: what's crazy about hyung is that he told the very scary training noona that he wanted to sing wild flower up close 🐱: but for real, let me show you the distance (between doyoung & the training noona) 🐰: (explains that it's because he wanted the verse to be heard clearly; he was taught to sing the lyrics in a 'thin' manner and was very into that singing style, but that meant his singing would be soft)

doyoung sang park hyoshin's wild flower up close in front of the training noona when he was a trainee 🐯: what's crazy about hyung is that he told the very scary training noona that he wanted to sing wild flower up close 🐱: but for real, let me show you the distance (between doyoung & the training noona) 🐰: (explains that it's because he wanted the verse to be heard clearly; he was taught to sing the lyrics in a 'thin' manner and was very into that singing style, but that meant his singing would be soft)

링

38,732 views • 1 year ago

Resistance training can have long-term benefits that last years. Even if you later quit. Just one year of high-intensity resistance training can preserve leg strength in older adults for three years after stopping—even as muscle mass declines. This surprising resilience suggests that the benefits of strength training extend far beyond muscle size, creating lasting neuromuscular adaptations that keep you strong long after the workouts end. In contrast, those who engaged in moderate-intensity training (body weight) or did not exercise experienced significant losses in both strength and functionality within the three years after training stopped. This suggests that resistance training could be crucial for maintaining muscular functionality later in life, perhaps due to lasting increases in neuromuscular components like acetylcholine receptors — an idea sometimes referred to as “muscle memory.” Dr. Layne Norton (Layne Norton, PhD) dives deep into these surprising findings in episode 94 of the FoundMyFitness podcast. To get the full breakdown, make sure to watch the full episode:

Resistance training can have long-term benefits that last years. Even if you later quit. Just one year of high-intensity resistance training can preserve leg strength in older adults for three years after stopping—even as muscle mass declines. This surprising resilience suggests that the benefits of strength training extend far beyond muscle size, creating lasting neuromuscular adaptations that keep you strong long after the workouts end. In contrast, those who engaged in moderate-intensity training (body weight) or did not exercise experienced significant losses in both strength and functionality within the three years after training stopped. This suggests that resistance training could be crucial for maintaining muscular functionality later in life, perhaps due to lasting increases in neuromuscular components like acetylcholine receptors — an idea sometimes referred to as “muscle memory.” Dr. Layne Norton (Layne Norton, PhD) dives deep into these surprising findings in episode 94 of the FoundMyFitness podcast. To get the full breakdown, make sure to watch the full episode:

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

184,069 views • 1 year ago

Dennon Lewis 🏃‍♂️💨 To produce high volumes of sprinting you have to train for it; you cannot hope to turn up on a Saturday and just repeatedly output sprint after sprint without conditioning yourself for it. Dennon records the highest sprint for a large percentage of Dorking’s game, this is down to his position and style of play but as mentioned above, his training has to replicate that. If you’d like to find out more about how your training should be tailored to complement your game, reach out and let’s get a plan in place 💪

Dennon Lewis 🏃‍♂️💨 To produce high volumes of sprinting you have to train for it; you cannot hope to turn up on a Saturday and just repeatedly output sprint after sprint without conditioning yourself for it. Dennon records the highest sprint for a large percentage of Dorking’s game, this is down to his position and style of play but as mentioned above, his training has to replicate that. If you’d like to find out more about how your training should be tailored to complement your game, reach out and let’s get a plan in place 💪

Ben Bacon - Your Peak Performance

18,381 views • 7 months ago

I’ve wrapped up the year with a focused effort on increasing muscle strength, power, and mass—an aspect of training that I view as critical for long-term health and functional independence. What really stood out was how this process not only strengthens the body, but also hones mental toughness. I’ve noticed a clear improvement in stress management and an overall resilience that you don’t typically glean from textbooks or scientific papers—this is something you experience firsthand. In many ways, strength training is a pillar of what I often talk about in terms of longevity: building and maintaining lean muscle mass is key to better metabolic health, balance, and resilience as we age. I'm profoundly grateful for discovering a disciplined approach that has become a lifelong practice—helping me feel more confident, functionally independent, and overall healthier. I’m looking forward to carrying this momentum into 2025 and continuing to refine both the physical and mental aspects of my training. Here’s to a new year of improved performance, sustained health, and a deeper appreciation for the synergistic effect of strength on our bodies and our minds. Happy New Year!

I’ve wrapped up the year with a focused effort on increasing muscle strength, power, and mass—an aspect of training that I view as critical for long-term health and functional independence. What really stood out was how this process not only strengthens the body, but also hones mental toughness. I’ve noticed a clear improvement in stress management and an overall resilience that you don’t typically glean from textbooks or scientific papers—this is something you experience firsthand. In many ways, strength training is a pillar of what I often talk about in terms of longevity: building and maintaining lean muscle mass is key to better metabolic health, balance, and resilience as we age. I'm profoundly grateful for discovering a disciplined approach that has become a lifelong practice—helping me feel more confident, functionally independent, and overall healthier. I’m looking forward to carrying this momentum into 2025 and continuing to refine both the physical and mental aspects of my training. Here’s to a new year of improved performance, sustained health, and a deeper appreciation for the synergistic effect of strength on our bodies and our minds. Happy New Year!

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

222,861 views • 1 year ago

"Bodybuilding doesn't build functional strength!" Sorry, "functional strength" bros, but that silly cope of yours doesn't hold up in the real world. There is no functional and non-functional strength — strength is, by definition, functional, and the strength developed through dedicated bodybuilding training can be applied to any strenuous task. Physiologically, the only way to significantly increase a muscle's strength is to make it bigger. Especially when natural lifters are concerned, hypertrophy IS strength.

"Bodybuilding doesn't build functional strength!" Sorry, "functional strength" bros, but that silly cope of yours doesn't hold up in the real world. There is no functional and non-functional strength — strength is, by definition, functional, and the strength developed through dedicated bodybuilding training can be applied to any strenuous task. Physiologically, the only way to significantly increase a muscle's strength is to make it bigger. Especially when natural lifters are concerned, hypertrophy IS strength.

King of the Marsh

211,239 views • 8 months ago

I’ve always been so amazed when I see clips like this. They remind me of a real life Karate Kid. While I have trained when I was younger up until last year, I’ve always admired how strong the will of people can be. This woman enlisted in a training program at a Shaolin temple, this is as tough and as real as it gets, each crushing blow is felt, the intense training is what keeps them whole and unaffected. This is the kind of training that turns people into warriors. The age old traditional ways have molded some of the fiercest fighters of the world, could you withstand this training? I guess the better question would be, could you handle this kind of backbreaking training?

I’ve always been so amazed when I see clips like this. They remind me of a real life Karate Kid. While I have trained when I was younger up until last year, I’ve always admired how strong the will of people can be. This woman enlisted in a training program at a Shaolin temple, this is as tough and as real as it gets, each crushing blow is felt, the intense training is what keeps them whole and unaffected. This is the kind of training that turns people into warriors. The age old traditional ways have molded some of the fiercest fighters of the world, could you withstand this training? I guess the better question would be, could you handle this kind of backbreaking training?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

57,203 views • 1 month ago

Do you need to train heavy to build muscle? 💪 For years the mantra was you need to go heavy to build muscle. Or you needed to go heavy to stimulate large type II fast twitch fibers but go light for more reps to stimulate smaller type I fibers. But new research has challenged that dogma. Several meta-analysis have shown similar muscle growth with low loads vs high loads when set number is matched & proximity to failure is similar (PMIDs: 28834797, 35015560, 33312275, & 33433148). While muscle hypertrophy was not different between high and low load training, strength increased significantly more with high load training in all these meta-analysis As far as targeting fiber types, it becomes kind of irrelevant when you take an exercise close to failure because fiber types tend to be recruited in order from smallest to largest. So with high load training, small & large fibers get recruited quickly but you don’t do many reps. With low load training, you initially recruit smaller fibers but as the muscle fatigues it is forced to recruit the larger fibers as the exercise is taken close to failure. The net effect is that taking sets close to failure with high or low loads produces a lot of muscle activation and similar hypetrophy The take home is, do what you enjoy if muscle growth is the goal. Just make sure you train HARD & go close to failure (within a few reps) & do enough total sets. But if strength is a priority you’ll need to train heavy & be careful going to failure as it can impair strength gains From my first conversation with Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

Do you need to train heavy to build muscle? 💪 For years the mantra was you need to go heavy to build muscle. Or you needed to go heavy to stimulate large type II fast twitch fibers but go light for more reps to stimulate smaller type I fibers. But new research has challenged that dogma. Several meta-analysis have shown similar muscle growth with low loads vs high loads when set number is matched & proximity to failure is similar (PMIDs: 28834797, 35015560, 33312275, & 33433148). While muscle hypertrophy was not different between high and low load training, strength increased significantly more with high load training in all these meta-analysis As far as targeting fiber types, it becomes kind of irrelevant when you take an exercise close to failure because fiber types tend to be recruited in order from smallest to largest. So with high load training, small & large fibers get recruited quickly but you don’t do many reps. With low load training, you initially recruit smaller fibers but as the muscle fatigues it is forced to recruit the larger fibers as the exercise is taken close to failure. The net effect is that taking sets close to failure with high or low loads produces a lot of muscle activation and similar hypetrophy The take home is, do what you enjoy if muscle growth is the goal. Just make sure you train HARD & go close to failure (within a few reps) & do enough total sets. But if strength is a priority you’ll need to train heavy & be careful going to failure as it can impair strength gains From my first conversation with Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

Layne Norton, PhD

53,287 views • 1 year ago

Vigorous exercise, especially high-intensity interval training, is one of the best ways to refresh the body’s energy systems. It works in two ways: mitophagy clears out old, damaged mitochondria, and mitochondrial biogenesis builds new ones. This dual effect boosts cellular energy production, improving both physical and cognitive performance over time. High-intensity interval training is so effective because it creates metabolic stress, which increases lactate levels. That lactate sends a signal to activate PGC-1α, a protein that helps grow more mitochondria. Over time, having more mitochondria makes your muscles better at using oxygen, managing blood sugar, and reducing oxidative stress. The best part? You don’t need long workouts to get these benefits. Even short bursts of intense exercise can improve your metabolism, protect against muscle loss as you age, reduce inflammation, and boost your overall health.

Vigorous exercise, especially high-intensity interval training, is one of the best ways to refresh the body’s energy systems. It works in two ways: mitophagy clears out old, damaged mitochondria, and mitochondrial biogenesis builds new ones. This dual effect boosts cellular energy production, improving both physical and cognitive performance over time. High-intensity interval training is so effective because it creates metabolic stress, which increases lactate levels. That lactate sends a signal to activate PGC-1α, a protein that helps grow more mitochondria. Over time, having more mitochondria makes your muscles better at using oxygen, managing blood sugar, and reducing oxidative stress. The best part? You don’t need long workouts to get these benefits. Even short bursts of intense exercise can improve your metabolism, protect against muscle loss as you age, reduce inflammation, and boost your overall health.

Dr. Rhonda Patrick

322,726 views • 1 year ago

🔊‼️The BEST TRAINING SPLIT is the one that works in YOUR schedule‼️🔊 Be it for weight loss or to pack on some muscles, you’ll want to be consistent with a split that has you hitting each muscle groups between 2 to 3 times a week! Find a plan and stick to it, you’ve got this! #Furry #Fursuit #Fursuiting #FursuitFriday #Fitness #FursuitEveryday

🔊‼️The BEST TRAINING SPLIT is the one that works in YOUR schedule‼️🔊 Be it for weight loss or to pack on some muscles, you’ll want to be consistent with a split that has you hitting each muscle groups between 2 to 3 times a week! Find a plan and stick to it, you’ve got this! #Furry #Fursuit #Fursuiting #FursuitFriday #Fitness #FursuitEveryday

Kaïko the dotter 🔜 FWA

71,392 views • 1 year ago

Nick Jonas tells us that Paul Rudd exceeded all of his expectations while making ‘POWER BALLAD’. “I had very high hopes. A lot of my friends that had worked with him, everyone said, ‘This is going to be a great experience,’ and it was even better than I hoped it would be.”

Nick Jonas tells us that Paul Rudd exceeded all of his expectations while making ‘POWER BALLAD’. “I had very high hopes. A lot of my friends that had worked with him, everyone said, ‘This is going to be a great experience,’ and it was even better than I hoped it would be.”

DiscussingFilm

140,592 views • 1 month ago