Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin plus Zinc exponentially reduces COVID-19 symptoms if taken early on. The disinformation efforts around these drugs to treat COVID-19 has been shocking. Follow the science, not the narrative.

Dr. Simone Gold

931,817 subscribers

580,810 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Gesundheit & Wellness Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Greg

Gregvor 3 Jahren

Millions died from them withholding these medications.

Profilbild von ⭐️NAILED to the XRP CROSS⭐ blindfolds are optional

⭐️NAILED to the XRP CROSS⭐ blindfolds are optionalvor 3 Jahren

When Trump mentioned Hydroxychloroquine early on in the pandemic, and they instantly dismissed it and removed it,along with ivermectin from pharmacies, that said alot.

Profilbild von Sonny Farmer 🇺🇸 Patriot

Sonny Farmer 🇺🇸 Patriotvor 3 Jahren

So, we never needed a vaccine if treatment works.

Profilbild von Angela

Angelavor 3 Jahren

I had covid 1st time in January,got very sick but I was cured at hone from an Italian doctor,recovered perfectly with early home treatment. Took a month. 2nd time I got covid I used ivermectin,got better in only 3 days. Taste and smell back in 72 hours,was like a miracle.

Profilbild von ThatLadyOverThere

ThatLadyOverTherevor 3 Jahren

I take it for Lupus. Everyone in the house had it multiple times … everyone except me. I tried to tell people.

Profilbild von Re-Coyle

Re-Coylevor 3 Jahren

Was prescribed ivermectin when I had the original Covid and I also took vitamin C, D and zinc. Mild symptoms for two days Achy body for several days.

Profilbild von William Moon

William Moonvor 3 Jahren

Take 25 mg of zinc a day 5000 IUs of vitamin D three and 500 mg of Quercetin it’s as good as Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin

Profilbild von Curious Wally Staggs

Curious Wally Staggsvor 3 Jahren

@ADevotedYogi at home with the Delta variant, called doc for prescription: she said she had never heard of hydroychloroquine, and that Ivermectin was only for animals..told me (I'm over 65 w/heart condition) to "ride it out." I will never trust a doc again...

Profilbild von Barbara Orange

Barbara Orangevor 3 Jahren

Yes they do, I am living proof Ivermectin works!!!

Profilbild von Shane

Shanevor 3 Jahren

Everything She said is a Complete Lie and She Knows it.

Ähnliche Videos

"Drugs like Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Mebendazole, have a tremendous impact on cancer and can treat some of these aggressive (Turbo) cancers" I introduced the concept of using repurposed drugs to treat COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers during my NCI Testimony on March 8, 2025 in Edmonton. The Real National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)

"Drugs like Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Mebendazole, have a tremendous impact on cancer and can treat some of these aggressive (Turbo) cancers" I introduced the concept of using repurposed drugs to treat COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers during my NCI Testimony on March 8, 2025 in Edmonton. The Real National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)

William Makis

678,587 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) appears to blame Dr. Jake Scott, who treated hundreds of COVID-19 patients in the height of the pandemic, for over 100 deaths because he didn't treat patients with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin (both proven to be ineffective against COVID-19).

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) appears to blame Dr. Jake Scott, who treated hundreds of COVID-19 patients in the height of the pandemic, for over 100 deaths because he didn't treat patients with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin (both proven to be ineffective against COVID-19).

Heartland Signal

438,428 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Six years ago WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Despite tens of millions of deaths, the world has not sufficiently addressed the ongoing impacts of COVID-19, and we are more vulnerable to future pandemics due to anti-science officials leading government agencies around the world.

Six years ago WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Despite tens of millions of deaths, the world has not sufficiently addressed the ongoing impacts of COVID-19, and we are more vulnerable to future pandemics due to anti-science officials leading government agencies around the world.

Dr. Lucky Tran

13,815 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

What if the COVID-19 vaccine narrative isn't what it seems?

What if the COVID-19 vaccine narrative isn't what it seems?

UNIFYD

5,005,889 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🔻RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Are Being Suppressed RFK Jr. makes a shocking revelation about the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs, decades of proven safety, billions of doses administered, were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons but for legal and financial reasons. The problem boils down to a little-known federal law that bars the FDA from issuing an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if there is evidence that any existing, approved medication is effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine was found to be effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. What did it result in? A $200 billion vaccine business could have gone belly up overnight. Instead of listening to the growing evidence – 17,000 doctors signing petitions, countless peer-reviewed studies – Tony Fauci and other officials went on a warpath to discredit these treatments. A Nobel Prize-winning drug, Ivermectin, was derided as “horse medicine,” and hydroxychloroquine was falsely maligned as dangerous. The aim? To make sure the vaccines remained the only “approved” cure. But why did the attacks continue after the vaccines were granted EUA? It looks like the law requires that EUA status to be revoked if a functional treatment is found. And the motivation for “killing” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never scientific, but rather to protect a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field) have successfully treated tens of thousands of COVID patients with these drugs. And their bottom line, backed up by numbers: 500,000 American lives could have been saved. This is not merely a medical scandal, it is a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: how many lives were sacrificed to protect a narrative? Share this ! ⟁

🔻RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Are Being Suppressed RFK Jr. makes a shocking revelation about the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs, decades of proven safety, billions of doses administered, were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons but for legal and financial reasons. The problem boils down to a little-known federal law that bars the FDA from issuing an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if there is evidence that any existing, approved medication is effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine was found to be effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. What did it result in? A $200 billion vaccine business could have gone belly up overnight. Instead of listening to the growing evidence – 17,000 doctors signing petitions, countless peer-reviewed studies – Tony Fauci and other officials went on a warpath to discredit these treatments. A Nobel Prize-winning drug, Ivermectin, was derided as “horse medicine,” and hydroxychloroquine was falsely maligned as dangerous. The aim? To make sure the vaccines remained the only “approved” cure. But why did the attacks continue after the vaccines were granted EUA? It looks like the law requires that EUA status to be revoked if a functional treatment is found. And the motivation for “killing” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never scientific, but rather to protect a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field) have successfully treated tens of thousands of COVID patients with these drugs. And their bottom line, backed up by numbers: 500,000 American lives could have been saved. This is not merely a medical scandal, it is a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: how many lives were sacrificed to protect a narrative? Share this ! ⟁

Mr. Pool

80,103 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

During Covid, virtually every patient I sent to the ICU who was given Remdesivir died within 4 weeks. Those deaths were ALL classified as Covid related. If you or a loved one has Covid, do not let them give you Remdesivir!! The brand name is Veklury so don’t let them trick you. If you have REALLY bad symptoms, ask for azithromyicin (an antibiotic to stop any lung infection), promethazine/codeine syrup (to calm the cough), and a medrol dose pack (for the inflammation). Don’t forget to take your high dose ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, zinc, vitamins C, D, & E, and a good probiotic.

CaliRN619 🚑🩺🚑

33,678 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Were Suppressed In a stunning revelation, RFK Jr. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of proven safety and billions of doses administered—were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons, but for legal and financial ones. At the heart of the issue: a little-known federal law prohibiting the FDA from granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if any existing, approved medication is shown to be effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine had been acknowledged as effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. The result? A $200 billion vaccine enterprise could have collapsed overnight. Despite mounting evidence—including 17,000 doctors signing petitions and numerous peer-reviewed studies—officials like Tony Fauci led a relentless campaign to discredit these treatments. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, was dismissed as “horse medicine,” while hydroxychloroquine was falsely labeled as dangerous. The goal? To ensure the vaccines remained the only “approved” solution. But why did the attacks continue even after the vaccines received EUA? The law appears to require that EUA status be revoked if a functional treatment emerges. The incentive to “kill” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never about science—it was about protecting a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field), have treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully with these drugs. Their conclusion, backed by data: Half a million American lives could have been saved. This isn’t just a medical scandal—it’s a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: How many lives were lost to protect a narrative?

RFK Jr. Exposes the Real Reason Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine Were Suppressed In a stunning revelation, RFK Jr. lays bare the hidden motives behind the aggressive suppression of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine during the COVID-19 pandemic. These drugs—both with decades of proven safety and billions of doses administered—were systematically discredited, not for medical reasons, but for legal and financial ones. At the heart of the issue: a little-known federal law prohibiting the FDA from granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines if any existing, approved medication is shown to be effective against the target disease. If ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine had been acknowledged as effective against COVID-19, the EUA for vaccines would have been illegal. The result? A $200 billion vaccine enterprise could have collapsed overnight. Despite mounting evidence—including 17,000 doctors signing petitions and numerous peer-reviewed studies—officials like Tony Fauci led a relentless campaign to discredit these treatments. Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug, was dismissed as “horse medicine,” while hydroxychloroquine was falsely labeled as dangerous. The goal? To ensure the vaccines remained the only “approved” solution. But why did the attacks continue even after the vaccines received EUA? The law appears to require that EUA status be revoked if a functional treatment emerges. The incentive to “kill” ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine was never about science—it was about protecting a financial empire. Leading experts, including Yale’s Harvey Risch and Dr. Peter McCullough (the most published physician in his field), have treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully with these drugs. Their conclusion, backed by data: Half a million American lives could have been saved. This isn’t just a medical scandal—it’s a betrayal of public trust. The question remains: How many lives were lost to protect a narrative?

Camus

1,092,489 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🇨🇳⚡🦠 Increasing cases of HMPV Metapneumovirus Infections among humans have been reported in China The 🦠 that causes symptoms similar to a cold, flu or Covid-19 has also spread in the US.

🇨🇳⚡🦠 Increasing cases of HMPV Metapneumovirus Infections among humans have been reported in China The 🦠 that causes symptoms similar to a cold, flu or Covid-19 has also spread in the US.

ROWAN🇮🇳 🚩

111,133 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bill Gates & Anthony Fauci (NIH) both funded EcoHealth which created COVID-19 in the Wuhan Laboratory… They both placed reps in the NIH suppressing Ivermectin/HCQ to get emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccines… They knew Ivermectin/HCQ was effective against COVID-19 and would’ve saved thousands of lives… They didn’t care because they knew they would make billions from the ineffective vaccines.

Bill Gates & Anthony Fauci (NIH) both funded EcoHealth which created COVID-19 in the Wuhan Laboratory… They both placed reps in the NIH suppressing Ivermectin/HCQ to get emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccines… They knew Ivermectin/HCQ was effective against COVID-19 and would’ve saved thousands of lives… They didn’t care because they knew they would make billions from the ineffective vaccines.

Pelham

1,379,711 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Bill Gates & Anthony Fauci (NIH) both funded EcoHealth which created COVID-19 in the Wuhan Laboratory… They both placed reps in the NIH suppressing Ivermectin/HCQ to get emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccines… They knew Ivermectin/HCQ was effective against COVID-19 and would’ve saved thousands of lives… They didn’t care because they knew they would make billions from the ineffective vaccines.

Bill Gates & Anthony Fauci (NIH) both funded EcoHealth which created COVID-19 in the Wuhan Laboratory… They both placed reps in the NIH suppressing Ivermectin/HCQ to get emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccines… They knew Ivermectin/HCQ was effective against COVID-19 and would’ve saved thousands of lives… They didn’t care because they knew they would make billions from the ineffective vaccines.

Pelham

626,243 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Netherlands Lawyer, Peter E Stassen, on the case against Bill Gates and the co-conspirators: “The Judges have seen it. They know that the ‘Covid-19 Vaccine’…is not a ‘Vaccine’ but a Bioweapon and we offered the proof. The official ‘Covid-19’ narrative was fake…”

Netherlands Lawyer, Peter E Stassen, on the case against Bill Gates and the co-conspirators: “The Judges have seen it. They know that the ‘Covid-19 Vaccine’…is not a ‘Vaccine’ but a Bioweapon and we offered the proof. The official ‘Covid-19’ narrative was fake…”

Liz Churchill

698,615 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The media did everything to destroy my reputation in response to my support for ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine effectively preventing and treating COVID-19. Our mainstream media in the United States is sold out to big pharma. THIS IS INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS

The media did everything to destroy my reputation in response to my support for ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine effectively preventing and treating COVID-19. Our mainstream media in the United States is sold out to big pharma. THIS IS INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS

Dr. Stella Immanuel MD

146,085 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mario Nawfal NEVER FORGET! "Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital, you'll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you'll get $39,000." -Dr. Scott Jensen

Mario Nawfal NEVER FORGET! "Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital, you'll get paid $13,000. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you'll get $39,000." -Dr. Scott Jensen

E 🇺🇸

164,738 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

CIA Behavioral Specialist Chase Hughes on how to identify a PSYOP. Sound familiar? 🤔🤔🤔 I asked GROK what content was suppressed during the 4 years of the Biden Administration. Absolutely insane! COVID-19 vaccine side effects claims or safety concerns. Waning or breakthrough COVID-19 infections post-vaccination. Criticism of COVID-19 vaccine mandates or coercion. Doubts about COVID-19 PCR test accuracy or cycle thresholds. Claims COVID-19 originated from a lab (Wuhan Institute) rather than natural zoonotic spillover. Promotion of ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or other off-label treatments for COVID-19. Assertions that masks were ineffective for preventing COVID-19 transmission. Criticism of school closures or remote learning policies during the pandemic. Content alleging overcounting of COVID-19 deaths or misattribution. Hunter Biden laptop contents (emails, videos, business dealings in Ukraine/China). New York Post story on Hunter Biden laptop (October 2020 suppression). 2020 election fraud allegations or "stop the steal" narratives. Claims of irregularities in mail-in/absentee ballots or drop boxes. Posts questioning 2020 election security or certification processes. January 6, 2021, events framing or alternative viewpoints. Parody, memes, or satirical content mocking Biden administration COVID policies. Negative economic commentary (e.g., inflation, gas prices, recession risks). Criticism of U.S. foreign policy (e.g., Afghanistan withdrawal handling). Content on border security, immigration policies, or migrant surges. Views skeptical of climate change policies or green energy mandates. Discussions of gender ideology, transgender issues, or related policies. Abortion-related content conflicting with administration positions. Posts critical of Ukraine aid or U.S. involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Specific flagged claims (e.g., "COVID survival rate 99.96%," vaccine-Bell's palsy links). Books/videos on Amazon/YouTube critical of vaccines or mandates (altered visibility/search). Content from labeled "disinformation" individuals/groups (e.g., "Disinformation Dozen").

CIA Behavioral Specialist Chase Hughes on how to identify a PSYOP. Sound familiar? 🤔🤔🤔 I asked GROK what content was suppressed during the 4 years of the Biden Administration. Absolutely insane! COVID-19 vaccine side effects claims or safety concerns. Waning or breakthrough COVID-19 infections post-vaccination. Criticism of COVID-19 vaccine mandates or coercion. Doubts about COVID-19 PCR test accuracy or cycle thresholds. Claims COVID-19 originated from a lab (Wuhan Institute) rather than natural zoonotic spillover. Promotion of ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or other off-label treatments for COVID-19. Assertions that masks were ineffective for preventing COVID-19 transmission. Criticism of school closures or remote learning policies during the pandemic. Content alleging overcounting of COVID-19 deaths or misattribution. Hunter Biden laptop contents (emails, videos, business dealings in Ukraine/China). New York Post story on Hunter Biden laptop (October 2020 suppression). 2020 election fraud allegations or "stop the steal" narratives. Claims of irregularities in mail-in/absentee ballots or drop boxes. Posts questioning 2020 election security or certification processes. January 6, 2021, events framing or alternative viewpoints. Parody, memes, or satirical content mocking Biden administration COVID policies. Negative economic commentary (e.g., inflation, gas prices, recession risks). Criticism of U.S. foreign policy (e.g., Afghanistan withdrawal handling). Content on border security, immigration policies, or migrant surges. Views skeptical of climate change policies or green energy mandates. Discussions of gender ideology, transgender issues, or related policies. Abortion-related content conflicting with administration positions. Posts critical of Ukraine aid or U.S. involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Specific flagged claims (e.g., "COVID survival rate 99.96%," vaccine-Bell's palsy links). Books/videos on Amazon/YouTube critical of vaccines or mandates (altered visibility/search). Content from labeled "disinformation" individuals/groups (e.g., "Disinformation Dozen").

Patriot

15,752 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten