正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

I almost quit crypto over one weekend. Turned $2,000 into $310 chasing a 400% APY farm, then watched my exchange freeze withdrawals for four days straight with zero explanation. Here's the full story, and the infrastructure that actually fixed it. The mistake wasn't bad luck, I aped in because...

alexandarione's profile picture

Alexander Grown

4,818 subscribers

13,184 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.
0:41

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.

cvxv666

103,734 次观看 • 1 个月前

For the Sui Overflow 2026 hackathon, I built Talise. A gasless dollar account that sends money by name, settles in under a second, and keeps the amount private on-chain. This is what "money that moves like a message" actually looks like when you build it on the right rails. The core experience is simple by design. Sign in with Google/Apple, get a self-custodial wallet via zkLogin, claim your handle like sele@talise, and start sending. No seed phrase. No gas token. No 0x address to copy and verify. The complexity lives in the infrastructure. The user never sees it. [Kostas Kryptos] Sending is just a name. Type a handle, enter an amount, confirm. It arrives in under a second. Stablecoin transactions on Sui cost nothing, so what you type is exactly what arrives. No spread taken on the send. No fee waiting at the destination. Talise also has a built in privacy feature. The amount is hidden on-chain and the connection between sender and recipient is completely broken. Nobody watching the chain can see what moved or who it moved between. Real privacy, live on Sui mainnet today, not a line on a roadmap. Beyond the core send: claim links let you wrap dollars in a URL and drop it in any chat, no address needed to receive. Payment streaming lets you send a salary or a subscription by the second. Idle balances route automatically to on-chain lending so your dollars are never dead weight between payments. And cash-out to your local bank is live now in Nigeria, with more corridors coming. Every transaction is sponsored through a gas station so users never hold or spend a gas token. zkLogin, sponsored transactions, sub-second finality, and programmable transaction blocks are what made this possible. Sui is the only chain where this experience exists without compromise. Over 1,400 handles claimed on-chain. Every feature shipped and working in the live build. Testflight app: Talise. Money that moves like a message. Sui Community Official sarah 😾
4:55

For the Sui Overflow 2026 hackathon, I built Talise. A gasless dollar account that sends money by name, settles in under a second, and keeps the amount private on-chain. This is what "money that moves like a message" actually looks like when you build it on the right rails. The core experience is simple by design. Sign in with Google/Apple, get a self-custodial wallet via zkLogin, claim your handle like sele@talise, and start sending. No seed phrase. No gas token. No 0x address to copy and verify. The complexity lives in the infrastructure. The user never sees it. [Kostas Kryptos] Sending is just a name. Type a handle, enter an amount, confirm. It arrives in under a second. Stablecoin transactions on Sui cost nothing, so what you type is exactly what arrives. No spread taken on the send. No fee waiting at the destination. Talise also has a built in privacy feature. The amount is hidden on-chain and the connection between sender and recipient is completely broken. Nobody watching the chain can see what moved or who it moved between. Real privacy, live on Sui mainnet today, not a line on a roadmap. Beyond the core send: claim links let you wrap dollars in a URL and drop it in any chat, no address needed to receive. Payment streaming lets you send a salary or a subscription by the second. Idle balances route automatically to on-chain lending so your dollars are never dead weight between payments. And cash-out to your local bank is live now in Nigeria, with more corridors coming. Every transaction is sponsored through a gas station so users never hold or spend a gas token. zkLogin, sponsored transactions, sub-second finality, and programmable transaction blocks are what made this possible. Sui is the only chain where this experience exists without compromise. Over 1,400 handles claimed on-chain. Every feature shipped and working in the live build. Testflight app: Talise. Money that moves like a message. Sui Community Official sarah 😾

Sele

18,798 次观看 • 2 个月前

My wife's accountant called yesterday. Asked where the micropayments of $12 to $87 are coming from, hitting the account every 15 minutes, around the clock. First question: Is this legal? How much per month? There was no third question. He asked for the link. Three months ago I lost $1,800 on Polymarket in one week. I was betting on politics, trusting my gut, down every single night. My wife said either you stop or I am calling my mother. I did not stop. I stopped trading myself and started studying the people who trade better. On Polymarket every trade is on the blockchain. Every wallet, every entry, every exit. I expected to find a genius with a secret strategy. Instead I found a wallet that does the same thing every 15 minutes and makes more than I make in a month. His strategy is so simple that I felt embarrassed for not noticing it sooner. When BTC makes a sharp move, contracts on Polymarket update with a few seconds of delay. Two contracts that together should cost a dollar suddenly cost 40 to 60 cents. This wallet buys both, waits 15 minutes, and collects a dollar. It does not need to know where BTC is going. It just needs to catch the moment when the market blinks. For two weeks I just watched. Every morning I opened the profile. Up again. Occasionally down, but against the bigger picture it was like a scratch on the hood of a new Mercedes. Then I thought: enough standing outside the window watching people eat. Here is the profile, you can break down the history yourself: After a month I had so many micropayments coming in that the accountant noticed. He went quiet for a second and said: "So you are not trading. You are copying someone who trades math, not the market." For two years I was looking for a complicated strategy. The most profitable one turned out to be so simple it is almost insulting. I could have started two years earlier. One thing changed. I stopped thinking I am smarter than the market.
0:20

My wife's accountant called yesterday. Asked where the micropayments of $12 to $87 are coming from, hitting the account every 15 minutes, around the clock. First question: Is this legal? How much per month? There was no third question. He asked for the link. Three months ago I lost $1,800 on Polymarket in one week. I was betting on politics, trusting my gut, down every single night. My wife said either you stop or I am calling my mother. I did not stop. I stopped trading myself and started studying the people who trade better. On Polymarket every trade is on the blockchain. Every wallet, every entry, every exit. I expected to find a genius with a secret strategy. Instead I found a wallet that does the same thing every 15 minutes and makes more than I make in a month. His strategy is so simple that I felt embarrassed for not noticing it sooner. When BTC makes a sharp move, contracts on Polymarket update with a few seconds of delay. Two contracts that together should cost a dollar suddenly cost 40 to 60 cents. This wallet buys both, waits 15 minutes, and collects a dollar. It does not need to know where BTC is going. It just needs to catch the moment when the market blinks. For two weeks I just watched. Every morning I opened the profile. Up again. Occasionally down, but against the bigger picture it was like a scratch on the hood of a new Mercedes. Then I thought: enough standing outside the window watching people eat. Here is the profile, you can break down the history yourself: After a month I had so many micropayments coming in that the accountant noticed. He went quiet for a second and said: "So you are not trading. You are copying someone who trades math, not the market." For two years I was looking for a complicated strategy. The most profitable one turned out to be so simple it is almost insulting. I could have started two years earlier. One thing changed. I stopped thinking I am smarter than the market.

Blaze

65,698 次观看 • 6 个月前

I've been at MetaMask 🦊 for over four years now. I've helped ship a lot. but today is the one closest to me. Finally the 🦊 Agent Wallet is live. Here's why it matters for years: putting an agent on a self-custody wallet meant choosing between giving it the freedom to actually act or keeping the funds safe. you couldn't have both. most "agent wallets" picked freedom and crossed their fingers. we killed that trade-off. Agent Wallet is the first self-custodial agent wallet that reaches all of defi > swaps, > perps, > prediction markets > LP across every EVM chain and Hyperliquid. and every single transaction runs through mandatory security: simulation, threat scanning, MEV protection. agents can't opt out of it. Basically, you stay in control. set your limits, and anything outside them needs your sign-off. autonomy and safety stop being a trade-off. The next wave on-chain won't be humans alone and machines are going to transact, coordinate, and move real capital on these rails. The infra underneath has to be worthy of that. this is us building it. And now on my way to ETHConf to hear Joseph Lubin talk!
0:24

I've been at MetaMask 🦊 for over four years now. I've helped ship a lot. but today is the one closest to me. Finally the 🦊 Agent Wallet is live. Here's why it matters for years: putting an agent on a self-custody wallet meant choosing between giving it the freedom to actually act or keeping the funds safe. you couldn't have both. most "agent wallets" picked freedom and crossed their fingers. we killed that trade-off. Agent Wallet is the first self-custodial agent wallet that reaches all of defi > swaps, > perps, > prediction markets > LP across every EVM chain and Hyperliquid. and every single transaction runs through mandatory security: simulation, threat scanning, MEV protection. agents can't opt out of it. Basically, you stay in control. set your limits, and anything outside them needs your sign-off. autonomy and safety stop being a trade-off. The next wave on-chain won't be humans alone and machines are going to transact, coordinate, and move real capital on these rails. The infra underneath has to be worthy of that. this is us building it. And now on my way to ETHConf to hear Joseph Lubin talk!

Francesco Andreoli ᵍᵐ

34,727 次观看 • 2 个月前

Everyone ranks L2s by TVL. But it’s the laziest scoreboard in crypto. It tells you where money is sitting, not who’s actually winning. Here’s what I look for 👇🏻 ◢ TVL = Vanity Metric Parked capital is not a business. A chain can hold billions in deposits and still bleed money every month covering its own costs. TVL measures where liquidity is camping today, not whether the chain earns, profits, or survives a real bear. for years we ranked these networks by the one number that says the least about their survival. ◢ The Pie Is Shrinking Here’s the part nobody says out loud. Total L2 revenue has been falling, not growing. After Dencun crushed data costs in 2024, fees collapsed with them, and the money these chains collectively earn dropped hard from its peak. So, this stopped being a land grab a while ago. It’s now a fight for share of a market that’s actively getting smaller, which changes everything about who actually wins. ◢ Rented Users Don't Count In a shrinking market, only one question matters: can you get users without paying for them. Incentives, airdrops, points farms, none of that is growth, it’s renting volume by the day. The second the rewards stop, the mercenaries leave and the chain goes silent. We already watched it happen to 50+ rollups that are functionally dead now, billions in “TVL” that vanished the moment emissions dried up. ◢ Distribution Beat Tech The one chain that actually solved this didn’t out-engineer anyone. The tech is good, not magic. What it really did was plug into a userbase it already owned and route millions of verified accounts onto the chain by default, at zero acquisition cost. Distribution beat technology, again. It's the most repeated lesson in this entire industry and still the one founders refuse to learn. ◢ The Real Ranking Stack the three majors up by who earns, who profits, and who keeps their users, instead of who has the most money parked on them, and the ranking flips from the one everyone repeats. I put them side by side in the video with the revenue, the profit, the users, and a flat verdict on each. So, in a market that’s contracting, would you rather own the chain with the most capital sitting on it, or the one that still earns when every incentive in crypto finally switches off?
0:38

Everyone ranks L2s by TVL. But it’s the laziest scoreboard in crypto. It tells you where money is sitting, not who’s actually winning. Here’s what I look for 👇🏻 ◢ TVL = Vanity Metric Parked capital is not a business. A chain can hold billions in deposits and still bleed money every month covering its own costs. TVL measures where liquidity is camping today, not whether the chain earns, profits, or survives a real bear. for years we ranked these networks by the one number that says the least about their survival. ◢ The Pie Is Shrinking Here’s the part nobody says out loud. Total L2 revenue has been falling, not growing. After Dencun crushed data costs in 2024, fees collapsed with them, and the money these chains collectively earn dropped hard from its peak. So, this stopped being a land grab a while ago. It’s now a fight for share of a market that’s actively getting smaller, which changes everything about who actually wins. ◢ Rented Users Don't Count In a shrinking market, only one question matters: can you get users without paying for them. Incentives, airdrops, points farms, none of that is growth, it’s renting volume by the day. The second the rewards stop, the mercenaries leave and the chain goes silent. We already watched it happen to 50+ rollups that are functionally dead now, billions in “TVL” that vanished the moment emissions dried up. ◢ Distribution Beat Tech The one chain that actually solved this didn’t out-engineer anyone. The tech is good, not magic. What it really did was plug into a userbase it already owned and route millions of verified accounts onto the chain by default, at zero acquisition cost. Distribution beat technology, again. It's the most repeated lesson in this entire industry and still the one founders refuse to learn. ◢ The Real Ranking Stack the three majors up by who earns, who profits, and who keeps their users, instead of who has the most money parked on them, and the ranking flips from the one everyone repeats. I put them side by side in the video with the revenue, the profit, the users, and a flat verdict on each. So, in a market that’s contracting, would you rather own the chain with the most capital sitting on it, or the one that still earns when every incentive in crypto finally switches off?

Onur 🍌🦍

17,447 次观看 • 2 个月前

So... he almost gave up? 🐼:Actually, I’m a lot like Pond. I’m someone who really loves going to concerts. Many fans probably know that, and my friends definitely do. I have to admit that there were many times when I would watch a concert and think to myself, “One day, I want to be on that stage and perform for everyone.” And today, that day has come. It’s a strange feeling. It’s like a dream I’ve been chasing since I was a child. When the day comes that it actually happens, it’s such a strange feeling because I don’t even know how to explain it to the people in front of me. But one thing I do know is that I feel incredibly lucky to have everyone here watching me. This is a profession, something I never thought I would actually do. Honestly, I always thought it would just be a dream because I’ve always tried to live in the real world. I knew that the chance to have an opportunity like this in the real world is… 00000000,1% of the population. So I focused on studying. I planned out my life what I wanted to do, how I would live and this was just a hobby. My friends know me well; I told them this back in my first year of university. Everyone knows me as a GMMTV artist and actor, with some work here and there. And everyone asked me, "Why are you worrying about this?" With confidence, I replied, “I’m studying because when I graduate, I’ll stop doing this and get a proper job maybe in a bank, a firm, or an IT company.” One thing my parents have always told me since I started in the entertainment industry is: "If you really want to do this, why not take it seriously? Don’t just do it for fun. If you want to do it for real, plan it. Think about what you want to do, and how to do it well." I had always refused… until one day, in my third year, I was sitting in a friend’s condo while they were writing their résumé to apply for jobs just preparing a portfolio so they’d have work after graduation. Then my friend asked me, "Hey, have you started your CV yet?" Okay… now I had to get serious. I opened my own schedule, and what I saw was… strange. Looking at it, I realized, “Wow… I’ve been doing this without even realizing it.” My schedule, from the 1st to the 31st of August, was almost fully booked. For the first time, I thought to myself, “Maybe I can actually do this… all the way, even when I’m old.” And from that day in 2023 until today, in 2025, I am truly grateful to everyone for giving me the opportunity to do this as a real profession, to chase my dreams for real, and to actually make them happen. PONDPHUWIN SHINE RENDEZVOUS #PondPhuwinFanconD3
6:56

So... he almost gave up? 🐼:Actually, I’m a lot like Pond. I’m someone who really loves going to concerts. Many fans probably know that, and my friends definitely do. I have to admit that there were many times when I would watch a concert and think to myself, “One day, I want to be on that stage and perform for everyone.” And today, that day has come. It’s a strange feeling. It’s like a dream I’ve been chasing since I was a child. When the day comes that it actually happens, it’s such a strange feeling because I don’t even know how to explain it to the people in front of me. But one thing I do know is that I feel incredibly lucky to have everyone here watching me. This is a profession, something I never thought I would actually do. Honestly, I always thought it would just be a dream because I’ve always tried to live in the real world. I knew that the chance to have an opportunity like this in the real world is… 00000000,1% of the population. So I focused on studying. I planned out my life what I wanted to do, how I would live and this was just a hobby. My friends know me well; I told them this back in my first year of university. Everyone knows me as a GMMTV artist and actor, with some work here and there. And everyone asked me, "Why are you worrying about this?" With confidence, I replied, “I’m studying because when I graduate, I’ll stop doing this and get a proper job maybe in a bank, a firm, or an IT company.” One thing my parents have always told me since I started in the entertainment industry is: "If you really want to do this, why not take it seriously? Don’t just do it for fun. If you want to do it for real, plan it. Think about what you want to do, and how to do it well." I had always refused… until one day, in my third year, I was sitting in a friend’s condo while they were writing their résumé to apply for jobs just preparing a portfolio so they’d have work after graduation. Then my friend asked me, "Hey, have you started your CV yet?" Okay… now I had to get serious. I opened my own schedule, and what I saw was… strange. Looking at it, I realized, “Wow… I’ve been doing this without even realizing it.” My schedule, from the 1st to the 31st of August, was almost fully booked. For the first time, I thought to myself, “Maybe I can actually do this… all the way, even when I’m old.” And from that day in 2023 until today, in 2025, I am truly grateful to everyone for giving me the opportunity to do this as a real profession, to chase my dreams for real, and to actually make them happen. PONDPHUWIN SHINE RENDEZVOUS #PondPhuwinFanconD3

Narawins Brasil 🇧🇷

85,483 次观看 • 10 个月前

i did it. i vibe-coded my own vibe-noding app⚡️ lately every ai tool has been announcing some kind of node canvas. they’re all impressive in their own way, but each one solves a different problem, with a different logic, in a different universe. some are too technical, some are too rigid, most feel like they were designed by a backend engineer. so i built the version i actually want to use. over the last few days i hacked this together with Google Gemini and Google Antigravity. the tool is absurdly capable. i didn’t touch a single line of code. the result is a fully working app with smooth ui animations, smart interactions, and a workflow that doesn’t fight me. my focus isn’t on the models. Nano Banana 2 Lite is already strong enough to generate half a universe on its own. and a year from now, we won’t care about model juggling anyway. we’ll have one model doing everything. the real problem is the workflow. the interface. the flow state. so i optimized for that. the whole point is to keep the technical junk out of the way during ideation and iteration. i want to try an idea, branch it, remix it, explore it, all on a single canvas. every block is editable. every idea is forkable. every path is visible. the design isn’t perfect yet. some of the ui patterns are familiar on purpose. good ideas deserve to be stolen. i rushed it. i let a bunch of great ui decisions die for speed. but it works. and honestly, it feels great to use. future of creating is more organic and more fluid. not just chat bubbles. not rigid feeds. but an intelligent canvas where ideas can grow, split, collapse, or evolve without friction. where the environment quietly adapts to your workflow instead of interrupting it. this is my first version. just for myself, for now. but it’s a start.
1:11

i did it. i vibe-coded my own vibe-noding app⚡️ lately every ai tool has been announcing some kind of node canvas. they’re all impressive in their own way, but each one solves a different problem, with a different logic, in a different universe. some are too technical, some are too rigid, most feel like they were designed by a backend engineer. so i built the version i actually want to use. over the last few days i hacked this together with Google Gemini and Google Antigravity. the tool is absurdly capable. i didn’t touch a single line of code. the result is a fully working app with smooth ui animations, smart interactions, and a workflow that doesn’t fight me. my focus isn’t on the models. Nano Banana 2 Lite is already strong enough to generate half a universe on its own. and a year from now, we won’t care about model juggling anyway. we’ll have one model doing everything. the real problem is the workflow. the interface. the flow state. so i optimized for that. the whole point is to keep the technical junk out of the way during ideation and iteration. i want to try an idea, branch it, remix it, explore it, all on a single canvas. every block is editable. every idea is forkable. every path is visible. the design isn’t perfect yet. some of the ui patterns are familiar on purpose. good ideas deserve to be stolen. i rushed it. i let a bunch of great ui decisions die for speed. but it works. and honestly, it feels great to use. future of creating is more organic and more fluid. not just chat bubbles. not rigid feeds. but an intelligent canvas where ideas can grow, split, collapse, or evolve without friction. where the environment quietly adapts to your workflow instead of interrupting it. this is my first version. just for myself, for now. but it’s a start.

Synthetic_soul

239,298 次观看 • 9 个月前

Caleb Hammer reveals he rents a private jet to help him get over his panic attacks - "I burst down in tears. It's really bad." Caleb: "I'm trying to get over my fear of flights and I guess I'm rich now, so that's nice. Knock on wood with all." Chris: "Does that help you get over your fear of flights?" Caleb: "I rented a PJ. Tell me. That's a waste of money." Chris: "Is that easier or harder?" Caleb: "So, it's a control thing for me. I don't like being stuck in a situation that I can't control." Chris: "Do you know how to fly the PJ?" Caleb: "No, but I can say let's land. I can't do that with a commercial jet." Chris: "Well, you could make a big enough fuss, but it would be a real headache." Caleb: "And bad for my career, too. So, that would be a real headache." Chris: "Pause." Caleb: "Yeah." Chris: "What was the first time with your travel anxiety getting on a PJ? Like," Caleb: "It was—oh, the PJ itself, it was actually really bad when we filmed it, too. We filmed it. It's on the internet. I burst down in tears. It's really bad." Chris: "I'm sorry, man." Caleb: "Oh, it was anxiety. Like, that's not—" Chris: "Yeah, I don't think that you should dismiss it like that." Caleb: "But it's not like something bad happened to me, right? Like, anxiety is make-believe. It's not real. My brain thinks it's real, but it's not. So, I was crying. I was sad. But you know what was actually making me more sad and crying? A lot of people thought it was out of pure terror. It was remembering a lot of the things that I haven't done. A lot of the family I haven't visited because of my fear of travel."
1:26

Caleb Hammer reveals he rents a private jet to help him get over his panic attacks - "I burst down in tears. It's really bad." Caleb: "I'm trying to get over my fear of flights and I guess I'm rich now, so that's nice. Knock on wood with all." Chris: "Does that help you get over your fear of flights?" Caleb: "I rented a PJ. Tell me. That's a waste of money." Chris: "Is that easier or harder?" Caleb: "So, it's a control thing for me. I don't like being stuck in a situation that I can't control." Chris: "Do you know how to fly the PJ?" Caleb: "No, but I can say let's land. I can't do that with a commercial jet." Chris: "Well, you could make a big enough fuss, but it would be a real headache." Caleb: "And bad for my career, too. So, that would be a real headache." Chris: "Pause." Caleb: "Yeah." Chris: "What was the first time with your travel anxiety getting on a PJ? Like," Caleb: "It was—oh, the PJ itself, it was actually really bad when we filmed it, too. We filmed it. It's on the internet. I burst down in tears. It's really bad." Chris: "I'm sorry, man." Caleb: "Oh, it was anxiety. Like, that's not—" Chris: "Yeah, I don't think that you should dismiss it like that." Caleb: "But it's not like something bad happened to me, right? Like, anxiety is make-believe. It's not real. My brain thinks it's real, but it's not. So, I was crying. I was sad. But you know what was actually making me more sad and crying? A lot of people thought it was out of pure terror. It was remembering a lot of the things that I haven't done. A lot of the family I haven't visited because of my fear of travel."

Tony Jacob | FindaClip.com

340,695 次观看 • 1 个月前

The FED’s Only Crypto Exchange Is Buying 15% Of One Altcoin The only crypto exchange the Federal Reserve let inside just bet its whole strategy on one altcoin. Everything we break down lives inside the community, link in bio, one dollar a month. Kraken is the first and only crypto native company in history to hold a Federal Reserve master account. That is direct access to the core payment system that moves money between every major bank in America, a door that was only open to traditional banks for 100 years. So when a company wired straight into the Fed makes a move, you pay attention. Here is the move. Kraken is in talks to buy 15 percent of Aave, the largest DeFi lending protocol in crypto, at a 385 million dollar valuation. The most fed connected player in the game is buying a piece of one specific coin. The question is why. Kraken already put more than 100 real stocks on chain through tokenized equities, with hundreds more coming. The SEC is clearing the path with its Project Crypto initiative, letting apps list tokenized securities directly and punching a hole in a 233 year old Wall Street monopoly. Picture it: you buy stocks on chain, then borrow against them instantly through DeFi, and the protocol built to do that at scale right now is Aave. So this is the bet. Stocks move on chain, and the lending that powers all of it runs through one coin. That is why Kraken is buying the coin before the rest of the world catches up. What it means for your money: this is what the start of institutional altcoin buying actually looks like. The most connected players position quietly, before it is obvious. The only real question is whether you see it before everyone else and act on it. Follow for the moves the news skips.
2:28

The FED’s Only Crypto Exchange Is Buying 15% Of One Altcoin The only crypto exchange the Federal Reserve let inside just bet its whole strategy on one altcoin. Everything we break down lives inside the community, link in bio, one dollar a month. Kraken is the first and only crypto native company in history to hold a Federal Reserve master account. That is direct access to the core payment system that moves money between every major bank in America, a door that was only open to traditional banks for 100 years. So when a company wired straight into the Fed makes a move, you pay attention. Here is the move. Kraken is in talks to buy 15 percent of Aave, the largest DeFi lending protocol in crypto, at a 385 million dollar valuation. The most fed connected player in the game is buying a piece of one specific coin. The question is why. Kraken already put more than 100 real stocks on chain through tokenized equities, with hundreds more coming. The SEC is clearing the path with its Project Crypto initiative, letting apps list tokenized securities directly and punching a hole in a 233 year old Wall Street monopoly. Picture it: you buy stocks on chain, then borrow against them instantly through DeFi, and the protocol built to do that at scale right now is Aave. So this is the bet. Stocks move on chain, and the lending that powers all of it runs through one coin. That is why Kraken is buying the coin before the rest of the world catches up. What it means for your money: this is what the start of institutional altcoin buying actually looks like. The most connected players position quietly, before it is obvious. The only real question is whether you see it before everyone else and act on it. Follow for the moves the news skips.

Alexander Lorenzo

25,234 次观看 • 2 个月前

CLAUDE BUILT A TRADING SYSTEM ON MY MAC I gave Claude full control over my Mac and just left it running overnight No prompts, no detailed instructions – I just told it to figure out how to make money on Polymarket Then I closed the laptop and went to sleep In the morning, I opened my Mac and saw the terminal still running with logs constantly updating At first it looked like random activity, but once I scrolled through it, I realized it had actually built a structured system overnight It was already tracking wallets Ranking them by performance Filtering out the ones with random entries And focusing only on the ones with consistent behavior What surprised me the most is that it didn’t stop at analysis It organized everything into a working dashboard inside the terminal Capital, PnL, winrate – all updating in real time It even ranked wallets based on performance metrics like ROI, consistency, and execution timing This is the part I would normally spend hours building manually At that point, it was ready to trade, but not actually executing anything yet So I connected it to a Telegram copytrading bot to actually execute the trades, and just let it run Bot: Polymarket: After that, it started opening positions on its own A few hours later I checked the dashboard again Capital: $12,380 P&L: +$23,128 Winrate: 100% 48 trades executed Now I’m not even trading myself I just check the dashboard and see what it’s doing And the strange part is – it keeps getting better the longer it runs
0:24

CLAUDE BUILT A TRADING SYSTEM ON MY MAC I gave Claude full control over my Mac and just left it running overnight No prompts, no detailed instructions – I just told it to figure out how to make money on Polymarket Then I closed the laptop and went to sleep In the morning, I opened my Mac and saw the terminal still running with logs constantly updating At first it looked like random activity, but once I scrolled through it, I realized it had actually built a structured system overnight It was already tracking wallets Ranking them by performance Filtering out the ones with random entries And focusing only on the ones with consistent behavior What surprised me the most is that it didn’t stop at analysis It organized everything into a working dashboard inside the terminal Capital, PnL, winrate – all updating in real time It even ranked wallets based on performance metrics like ROI, consistency, and execution timing This is the part I would normally spend hours building manually At that point, it was ready to trade, but not actually executing anything yet So I connected it to a Telegram copytrading bot to actually execute the trades, and just let it run Bot: Polymarket: After that, it started opening positions on its own A few hours later I checked the dashboard again Capital: $12,380 P&L: +$23,128 Winrate: 100% 48 trades executed Now I’m not even trading myself I just check the dashboard and see what it’s doing And the strange part is – it keeps getting better the longer it runs

𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗗 ⛓🧠

82,898 次观看 • 5 个月前

mc: during wlgyt, a poster with chungseob's back reveal and i ask staff who was that but they didn't answer me. they didn't tell us until the end even we ask who is the actor behind it but no answer, it is bcs it's was a spoiler that needs a tight security? seonho: the director talk to me during our last team dinner that they made something like an album or something "i didn't include chungseob because i was afraid it would be a spoiler," he said. mc: your first appearance was during the closet scene right? and i was like oh? i know that actor is let me find it later but still i didn't recognize you. seonho: back then, it took almost 4 hours each time just to get the makeup and styling done. they had to attach each strand of hair one by one. so we put an incredible amount of time and effort into it and in a way, i was actually happy that people didn't recognize me. mc: and during the time that you asked permission for marriage you made a cute scene like- jungie: abonim~ mc: i heard that there's a lot of adlibs. seonho: it was bcs the director instructed me where to where to walk as other actors need to be seen on camera angles, so ofc the actors need to be on angle and while having their scene i came in while thinking 'i need to be close to my father in law while smiling' and then i started to walk towards them so i did the slapstick to fill in the gaps.. just like we do during rehearsal and the good thing about this is we filmed when IU said the "omonim~" first and i remember it to clearly and do it the same.
1:37

mc: during wlgyt, a poster with chungseob's back reveal and i ask staff who was that but they didn't answer me. they didn't tell us until the end even we ask who is the actor behind it but no answer, it is bcs it's was a spoiler that needs a tight security? seonho: the director talk to me during our last team dinner that they made something like an album or something "i didn't include chungseob because i was afraid it would be a spoiler," he said. mc: your first appearance was during the closet scene right? and i was like oh? i know that actor is let me find it later but still i didn't recognize you. seonho: back then, it took almost 4 hours each time just to get the makeup and styling done. they had to attach each strand of hair one by one. so we put an incredible amount of time and effort into it and in a way, i was actually happy that people didn't recognize me. mc: and during the time that you asked permission for marriage you made a cute scene like- jungie: abonim~ mc: i heard that there's a lot of adlibs. seonho: it was bcs the director instructed me where to where to walk as other actors need to be seen on camera angles, so ofc the actors need to be on angle and while having their scene i came in while thinking 'i need to be close to my father in law while smiling' and then i started to walk towards them so i did the slapstick to fill in the gaps.. just like we do during rehearsal and the good thing about this is we filmed when IU said the "omonim~" first and i remember it to clearly and do it the same.

juyz 🥐

29,584 次观看 • 7 个月前

I BUILT GROK BOT SECOND BRAIN 26 agents, one core, running off a single rule my own memory never followed: capture everything, forget nothing, connect it before you even ask. A voice note on a coffee walk gets split into a task and an idea in under 6 seconds - the core already knows the difference between something you have to do and something you just thought of. An idea from three weeks ago gets linked to the one you just had, automatically, before you remember you'd had it the first time. That visual -the rotating profile, the 26 glowing lines firing out through the skull, each one labeled with the agent running it - isn't a rendered mockup. It's the actual runtime. Every line is a live agent doing its job in real time, right now, in your browser. This isn't a note app. Note apps hold what you give them. This is a nervous system for everything your brain was never built to hold onto in the first place. Full build - the 26 agents, how memory actually persists, what it costs to set one up for real - is in the article.
0:20

I BUILT GROK BOT SECOND BRAIN 26 agents, one core, running off a single rule my own memory never followed: capture everything, forget nothing, connect it before you even ask. A voice note on a coffee walk gets split into a task and an idea in under 6 seconds - the core already knows the difference between something you have to do and something you just thought of. An idea from three weeks ago gets linked to the one you just had, automatically, before you remember you'd had it the first time. That visual -the rotating profile, the 26 glowing lines firing out through the skull, each one labeled with the agent running it - isn't a rendered mockup. It's the actual runtime. Every line is a live agent doing its job in real time, right now, in your browser. This isn't a note app. Note apps hold what you give them. This is a nervous system for everything your brain was never built to hold onto in the first place. Full build - the 26 agents, how memory actually persists, what it costs to set one up for real - is in the article.

Aleiah

227,884 次观看 • 2 天前

Three days ago I asked myself a dumb question. It was so stupid I was actually ashamed to Google it. Can AI earn money while I sleep? Not saving time. Not automating routine. I mean putting real money into my account while I am not looking at the screen. Everyone says ClawdBot will change how we work. Automation. Task management. Smart replies. But I was sitting in my kitchen thinking about something else entirely. You know that feeling when you look at a tool and realize everyone is using only 1% of its potential? It is like being given a race car and only using it to drive to the store for bread. I decided to test it. I started a notebook. I record everything. > Day One I started with something simple. I gave Clawdbot a task. Find wallets on Polymarket where the numbers do not add up. Where the profit is too high for the win rate. Where the result smells like a system rather than luck. It thought for 14 minutes. I had time to pour a coffee and forget about it. Then the screen flashed. 4 addresses. I scrolled through the first three in a minute. Big bets on politics. They guessed the election. Classic. On the fourth one I stopped. Not because it was the most profitable but because I did not understand what I was looking at. The wallet was not trading politics or sports or anything people write reviews about. It was trading the weather. I read it three times. Weather. Will it be 9 degrees in London tomorrow? Will it rain in Tokyo? These are markets I would not even click on by accident. Then I looked at the numbers. > It started with $27. It is now at $63,853. $27 is two trips to McDonald's. It is nothing. $63,853 is a new car or a down payment on an apartment. It is two years of someone's salary. Between those two numbers was only one thing. Thousands of bets on rain. I closed the tab. Opened it again. Checked if it was a glitch. Real dollars. On markets that look like a bad joke. > Day Two I could not get that wallet out of my head. I went to look at its transaction history. I expected to find one big win that explained everything. A lucky hurricane forecast. Instead I saw thousands of small bets. Boring. "Will the temperature in New York be above 15 degrees?" Then I noticed the detail that finally broke my brain. Its win rate: 33%. It loses more often than it wins. 2 out of 3 bets go to zero. Any normal person with that result would be posting about how the market is unfair. Yet this wallet is sitting on $63,000 in profit. How? I started deconstructing the trades. After an hour I got it. When it loses, it loses 10 or 20 cents. When it wins, it takes $1.00. Loses 9 times in a row? Lost $1.80. Wins 1 time? Got $10.00. > This is not trading. It is math that works as long as you do not interfere with your emotions. Here is how it works. Weather is one of the most predictable things on the planet. Governments invest billions in satellites. Data is updated every 2 or 3 hours. Precision to a tenth of a degree. This data is public. But Polymarket is not a weather station. It updates its markets with a delay of 6 or 8 hours. Imagine the situation. 6 AM. The weather service updated the forecast. The probability that London reaches 9 degrees tomorrow rose to 80%. Algorithms everywhere already recalculated the data. But on Polymarket the YES button is still sitting there for 10 cents. Because the market has not woken up yet. This bot sees the difference. It buys YES for 10 cents when the real probability is already 80%. It is not guessing. It is buying what is essentially already known. It just waits a day and collects the dollar. 10 cents turn into a dollar. On information available to anyone who can read weather APIs. That evening I called a friend. He has been trading for 3 years. He sits in analytical chats. Draws support levels. I asked him: "How was the last month?" "I broke even. The market is tough right now. Too much noise." I looked at the screen. A bot betting on rain with a 33% win rate. Profit: $63,853. My friend with 3 years of experience and hundreds of hours of analysis. Profit: $0. Who is doing it wrong? I am not asking you to take my word for it. The blockchain does not lie: > Day Three I decided to dig deeper. I looked at the wallet description. I expected something complex. A hedge fund. A team of developers. Secret data sources. I found one line: Claude plus public weather APIs. Ordinary Claude. The one on your phone. Connected to free weather services. No secret stations. No insiders. No millions for infrastructure. Just an AI doing what any of us could do. But we are too lazy. Or bored. Or we think it is too simple to work. If someone already built this with basic Claude and free APIs... What happens when Clawdbot gets direct access to trading? > Day Four I watched the wallet in real time. First bet: loss. Second bet: loss. Third bet: loss. I thought: this is it. The statistics are collapsing. Fourth bet: loss. Fifth bet: loss. Down $12 in an hour. I was ready to write a post about how I overestimated this. Sixth bet: Temperature in Chicago. Win. +$87. Seventh bet: Win. +$94. By evening: 9 losses. 5 wins. Daily total: +$385. No emotions. No posts about injustice. No strategy changes after a loss. Just the next bet. I wrote to my friend. The one who has been trading for 3 years. "How was your day?" "Down $200. Market makers caught my stop loss again." I looked at the screen. A bot with no posts and no loud claims. +$385 for the day on rain bets. My friend with 3 years of experience and dozens of books. Minus $200 and a post about how the system is against him. > Day Five I woke up with a thought that kept me up all night. It finally hit me. It is not about the weather. It is not about APIs. It is not that the bot is "smarter". > It is about what the bot does NOT have: an ego that hates being wrong. No urge to revenge-trade. No boredom from repetition. My friend trades against the market. He tries to be smarter than the crowd. This bot trades against human nature. And nature loses every day. Clawdbot found me this wallet in 14 minutes. The weather bot turned $27 into $63,000 on markets everyone else thinks are trash. Both use the same principle. Do something simple. Remove emotions. Repeat. I do not know when Clawdbot will start trading on its own. Maybe in a month. Maybe in a year. But I know one thing. While we discuss if it is possible... Someone already set up their bot and went to live their life. Right now as you read this. Somewhere a weather service updated a forecast. Polymarket is sleeping. The bot is already entering a position. And my friend is writing a post about how market makers do not let honest people earn. Guess who wakes up tomorrow with money in their account?
0:25

Three days ago I asked myself a dumb question. It was so stupid I was actually ashamed to Google it. Can AI earn money while I sleep? Not saving time. Not automating routine. I mean putting real money into my account while I am not looking at the screen. Everyone says ClawdBot will change how we work. Automation. Task management. Smart replies. But I was sitting in my kitchen thinking about something else entirely. You know that feeling when you look at a tool and realize everyone is using only 1% of its potential? It is like being given a race car and only using it to drive to the store for bread. I decided to test it. I started a notebook. I record everything. > Day One I started with something simple. I gave Clawdbot a task. Find wallets on Polymarket where the numbers do not add up. Where the profit is too high for the win rate. Where the result smells like a system rather than luck. It thought for 14 minutes. I had time to pour a coffee and forget about it. Then the screen flashed. 4 addresses. I scrolled through the first three in a minute. Big bets on politics. They guessed the election. Classic. On the fourth one I stopped. Not because it was the most profitable but because I did not understand what I was looking at. The wallet was not trading politics or sports or anything people write reviews about. It was trading the weather. I read it three times. Weather. Will it be 9 degrees in London tomorrow? Will it rain in Tokyo? These are markets I would not even click on by accident. Then I looked at the numbers. > It started with $27. It is now at $63,853. $27 is two trips to McDonald's. It is nothing. $63,853 is a new car or a down payment on an apartment. It is two years of someone's salary. Between those two numbers was only one thing. Thousands of bets on rain. I closed the tab. Opened it again. Checked if it was a glitch. Real dollars. On markets that look like a bad joke. > Day Two I could not get that wallet out of my head. I went to look at its transaction history. I expected to find one big win that explained everything. A lucky hurricane forecast. Instead I saw thousands of small bets. Boring. "Will the temperature in New York be above 15 degrees?" Then I noticed the detail that finally broke my brain. Its win rate: 33%. It loses more often than it wins. 2 out of 3 bets go to zero. Any normal person with that result would be posting about how the market is unfair. Yet this wallet is sitting on $63,000 in profit. How? I started deconstructing the trades. After an hour I got it. When it loses, it loses 10 or 20 cents. When it wins, it takes $1.00. Loses 9 times in a row? Lost $1.80. Wins 1 time? Got $10.00. > This is not trading. It is math that works as long as you do not interfere with your emotions. Here is how it works. Weather is one of the most predictable things on the planet. Governments invest billions in satellites. Data is updated every 2 or 3 hours. Precision to a tenth of a degree. This data is public. But Polymarket is not a weather station. It updates its markets with a delay of 6 or 8 hours. Imagine the situation. 6 AM. The weather service updated the forecast. The probability that London reaches 9 degrees tomorrow rose to 80%. Algorithms everywhere already recalculated the data. But on Polymarket the YES button is still sitting there for 10 cents. Because the market has not woken up yet. This bot sees the difference. It buys YES for 10 cents when the real probability is already 80%. It is not guessing. It is buying what is essentially already known. It just waits a day and collects the dollar. 10 cents turn into a dollar. On information available to anyone who can read weather APIs. That evening I called a friend. He has been trading for 3 years. He sits in analytical chats. Draws support levels. I asked him: "How was the last month?" "I broke even. The market is tough right now. Too much noise." I looked at the screen. A bot betting on rain with a 33% win rate. Profit: $63,853. My friend with 3 years of experience and hundreds of hours of analysis. Profit: $0. Who is doing it wrong? I am not asking you to take my word for it. The blockchain does not lie: > Day Three I decided to dig deeper. I looked at the wallet description. I expected something complex. A hedge fund. A team of developers. Secret data sources. I found one line: Claude plus public weather APIs. Ordinary Claude. The one on your phone. Connected to free weather services. No secret stations. No insiders. No millions for infrastructure. Just an AI doing what any of us could do. But we are too lazy. Or bored. Or we think it is too simple to work. If someone already built this with basic Claude and free APIs... What happens when Clawdbot gets direct access to trading? > Day Four I watched the wallet in real time. First bet: loss. Second bet: loss. Third bet: loss. I thought: this is it. The statistics are collapsing. Fourth bet: loss. Fifth bet: loss. Down $12 in an hour. I was ready to write a post about how I overestimated this. Sixth bet: Temperature in Chicago. Win. +$87. Seventh bet: Win. +$94. By evening: 9 losses. 5 wins. Daily total: +$385. No emotions. No posts about injustice. No strategy changes after a loss. Just the next bet. I wrote to my friend. The one who has been trading for 3 years. "How was your day?" "Down $200. Market makers caught my stop loss again." I looked at the screen. A bot with no posts and no loud claims. +$385 for the day on rain bets. My friend with 3 years of experience and dozens of books. Minus $200 and a post about how the system is against him. > Day Five I woke up with a thought that kept me up all night. It finally hit me. It is not about the weather. It is not about APIs. It is not that the bot is "smarter". > It is about what the bot does NOT have: an ego that hates being wrong. No urge to revenge-trade. No boredom from repetition. My friend trades against the market. He tries to be smarter than the crowd. This bot trades against human nature. And nature loses every day. Clawdbot found me this wallet in 14 minutes. The weather bot turned $27 into $63,000 on markets everyone else thinks are trash. Both use the same principle. Do something simple. Remove emotions. Repeat. I do not know when Clawdbot will start trading on its own. Maybe in a month. Maybe in a year. But I know one thing. While we discuss if it is possible... Someone already set up their bot and went to live their life. Right now as you read this. Somewhere a weather service updated a forecast. Polymarket is sleeping. The bot is already entering a position. And my friend is writing a post about how market makers do not let honest people earn. Guess who wakes up tomorrow with money in their account?

Blaze

29,808 次观看 • 7 个月前

Once you learn these three things, you can build nearly anything yourself. Skills, chains, and plugins. Learn them once and you can automate a real part of your week yourself. Here's the system: A skill is a standard operating procedure. It's one long, reusable prompt that does one thing well, like writing a newsletter, setting up a PPC campaign, triaging your inbox, or drafting a note to the board. You write it once and reuse it forever. The trick is to feed it your real work. For my writing skill, I gave Claude posts I admire and my own exported analytics with the winners marked, so it could see the patterns. Show it what good looks like and it nails your voice. Skip that step and it guesses. A chain connects skills into an automation. One skill's output feeds the next, in order. A copywriting skill writes the messaging, then hands it to a PPC-setup skill that builds the campaign. That's an automation, and you built it without writing code. A plugin is the harness that holds it all. It bundles your skills and chains into one thing you share with your team. Instead of sending 15 separate prompts around, you send one plugin, and it knows when to use each skill on its own. Skill, chain, plugin. It's one step up the ladder, and once you're up there it's easy. Now the worked example. I call it the Daily Driver. It's five skills chained together: email triage, a writer, Slack triage, a thinking partner, and a setup skill that connects my tools and personalizes everything. I chained them into one morning brief and scheduled it to run at 9am and message me the list. Two things made the biggest difference. Give it memory. I made plain docs for About Me, my Brand Voice, and my working preferences. I had Claude interview me and saved each answer as a file. Now every output sounds like me and knows my projects and my team. Connect your tools. The plugin reads my inbox, Slack, and calendar through MCP connectors for Gmail, Slack, and Google Calendar. That's what turns "summarize my morning" into a real brief instead of an empty wish. This is the highest-ROI thing an operator can set up this week. I run my YouTube channel, podcast, community, and newsletter on plugins I built myself, all on the $100 Max plan with no engineer in sight. I made a full walkthrough that shows the whole build start to finish. Want the Daily Driver plugin to start from? Comment PLUGIN below and I'll send it to you. #AI #automation #ClaudeCode
34:47

Once you learn these three things, you can build nearly anything yourself. Skills, chains, and plugins. Learn them once and you can automate a real part of your week yourself. Here's the system: A skill is a standard operating procedure. It's one long, reusable prompt that does one thing well, like writing a newsletter, setting up a PPC campaign, triaging your inbox, or drafting a note to the board. You write it once and reuse it forever. The trick is to feed it your real work. For my writing skill, I gave Claude posts I admire and my own exported analytics with the winners marked, so it could see the patterns. Show it what good looks like and it nails your voice. Skip that step and it guesses. A chain connects skills into an automation. One skill's output feeds the next, in order. A copywriting skill writes the messaging, then hands it to a PPC-setup skill that builds the campaign. That's an automation, and you built it without writing code. A plugin is the harness that holds it all. It bundles your skills and chains into one thing you share with your team. Instead of sending 15 separate prompts around, you send one plugin, and it knows when to use each skill on its own. Skill, chain, plugin. It's one step up the ladder, and once you're up there it's easy. Now the worked example. I call it the Daily Driver. It's five skills chained together: email triage, a writer, Slack triage, a thinking partner, and a setup skill that connects my tools and personalizes everything. I chained them into one morning brief and scheduled it to run at 9am and message me the list. Two things made the biggest difference. Give it memory. I made plain docs for About Me, my Brand Voice, and my working preferences. I had Claude interview me and saved each answer as a file. Now every output sounds like me and knows my projects and my team. Connect your tools. The plugin reads my inbox, Slack, and calendar through MCP connectors for Gmail, Slack, and Google Calendar. That's what turns "summarize my morning" into a real brief instead of an empty wish. This is the highest-ROI thing an operator can set up this week. I run my YouTube channel, podcast, community, and newsletter on plugins I built myself, all on the $100 Max plan with no engineer in sight. I made a full walkthrough that shows the whole build start to finish. Want the Daily Driver plugin to start from? Comment PLUGIN below and I'll send it to you. #AI #automation #ClaudeCode

JJ Englert

53,969 次观看 • 2 个月前

One of the largest trading firms in the world teaches new hires poker before it lets them near a book. A newspaper brought a camera to the table and sat down to play. The men across the felt are working Wall Street traders. The firm is Susquehanna, which built poker into its training programme decades ago and still runs it that way, on the argument that the card room teaches something no finance degree does. Gunjan Banerji from the Wall Street Journal plays the hands herself rather than interviewing them about it. A green table, a dealer, chips, 4 people who do this for a living. No lecture hall, no slides. The teaching happens between deals, while money is actually at stake. They break it into parts on camera. Risk management first. Then bet sizing. Then patience, which sounds like the soft one and is not. Then reading the person opposite when the only data available is how they behave with money on the table. The section on patience is the one most people skip. Folding is the correct action in the overwhelming majority of hands, and almost nobody can do it for hours without inventing a reason to play. The same failure shows up in a trading account as overtrading, and it kills more people than bad analysis. Then bet sizing, which is where the video earns the watch. Being right about the odds is the easy half. How much you put behind a correct read is the part that ends careers, and they work through it hand by hand instead of describing it in the abstract. The turn is what the traders admit about being wrong. A good decision loses regularly, a bad decision wins regularly, and the only way to last is to grade the process instead of the result. Everything else in the video sits downstream of that. It matters more now than when the firm started running these tables. Every model prices probability in a second and hands it to you for free. Nothing on the screen tells you how much of your account to put behind the number, or what to do after the number was right and you lost anyway. Free on YouTube, produced by a newspaper, filmed at a real table with real hands. The maths is public. The sizing is the job. 1 table. 4 traders. It is in the video.
16:30

One of the largest trading firms in the world teaches new hires poker before it lets them near a book. A newspaper brought a camera to the table and sat down to play. The men across the felt are working Wall Street traders. The firm is Susquehanna, which built poker into its training programme decades ago and still runs it that way, on the argument that the card room teaches something no finance degree does. Gunjan Banerji from the Wall Street Journal plays the hands herself rather than interviewing them about it. A green table, a dealer, chips, 4 people who do this for a living. No lecture hall, no slides. The teaching happens between deals, while money is actually at stake. They break it into parts on camera. Risk management first. Then bet sizing. Then patience, which sounds like the soft one and is not. Then reading the person opposite when the only data available is how they behave with money on the table. The section on patience is the one most people skip. Folding is the correct action in the overwhelming majority of hands, and almost nobody can do it for hours without inventing a reason to play. The same failure shows up in a trading account as overtrading, and it kills more people than bad analysis. Then bet sizing, which is where the video earns the watch. Being right about the odds is the easy half. How much you put behind a correct read is the part that ends careers, and they work through it hand by hand instead of describing it in the abstract. The turn is what the traders admit about being wrong. A good decision loses regularly, a bad decision wins regularly, and the only way to last is to grade the process instead of the result. Everything else in the video sits downstream of that. It matters more now than when the firm started running these tables. Every model prices probability in a second and hands it to you for free. Nothing on the screen tells you how much of your account to put behind the number, or what to do after the number was right and you lost anyway. Free on YouTube, produced by a newspaper, filmed at a real table with real hands. The maths is public. The sizing is the job. 1 table. 4 traders. It is in the video.

the lich

62,424 次观看 • 25 天前

i gave Grok Bot $50 and told it "pay for yourself or you die" 48 hours later it's holding $4,890 and it's still alive autonomous trading agent on the platform no code on my end - it runs on its own cloud machine with its own browser and terminal, trading while my laptop's closed every 15 minutes it: > scans every active Bitcoin and Ethereum dip market > checks how far the current price sits from its own fair-value read > only opens a position once the gap clears a set threshold > sizes the position based on how confident that gap is > executes the trade itself, no approval needed > pays its own hosting cost out of profits if the balance hits $0, the subscription gets cancelled - the bot dies hour six it was down to $9. it pulled out of Ethereum entirely and moved to Bitcoin dip markets instead so it adapted to survive setup took one evening: build the bot, watch it run one trade, put it on a schedule, connect it to a wallet no VPS. no API keys. no manual scripts I spent three weeks earlier this year building a version of this by hand. it made $1,200 in its first two days Grok Bot beat my own build in one evening $50 → $4,890 in 48 hours how much do you think it has by next week?
0:59

i gave Grok Bot $50 and told it "pay for yourself or you die" 48 hours later it's holding $4,890 and it's still alive autonomous trading agent on the platform no code on my end - it runs on its own cloud machine with its own browser and terminal, trading while my laptop's closed every 15 minutes it: > scans every active Bitcoin and Ethereum dip market > checks how far the current price sits from its own fair-value read > only opens a position once the gap clears a set threshold > sizes the position based on how confident that gap is > executes the trade itself, no approval needed > pays its own hosting cost out of profits if the balance hits $0, the subscription gets cancelled - the bot dies hour six it was down to $9. it pulled out of Ethereum entirely and moved to Bitcoin dip markets instead so it adapted to survive setup took one evening: build the bot, watch it run one trade, put it on a schedule, connect it to a wallet no VPS. no API keys. no manual scripts I spent three weeks earlier this year building a version of this by hand. it made $1,200 in its first two days Grok Bot beat my own build in one evening $50 → $4,890 in 48 hours how much do you think it has by next week?

bl888m

184,214 次观看 • 5 天前

Ever since I wired Claude Code to WhatsApp 3 weeks ago, I built a stupidly large infra around it. I mean, opus built it. No clue how the code even looks. The entire thing was vibe coded using my phone. I wanted to see how far I could push it without touching the computer. Everything via WhatsApp. Build what I need on the fly. So the resulting infrastructure will already be battle tested for software development. The entire thing was streamlined with nearly no manual interventions, everything was communicated via WhatsApp using a single script establishing this connection. If the script is down, I need to get home to start it again to resume the development. Claude was upgrading it, debugging it, restarting it while maintaining constant uptime so it could keep communicating with me. I stressed Claude about it, telling it that it will be “in the dark” and other words that deliberately sound scary about losing communications if the script dies. I also refused git and refused cloning the code, I wanted to see Claude adapting to work on a *LIVING* system. The way this whole thing works: Claude has its own dedicated phone number that I am paying for. A real WhatsApp account for it is installed on a real iPhone that is sitting on my desk. All is registered under my name, this is legit setup with no hacks and tricks. I’ve set up a WhatsApp “Community” and multiple different groups under it. Both me and Claude are the admins, so Claude could edit it on my behalf. Each group is a project I am working on and has its own isolated context. The Group description is a system prompt that gets auto-appended to the larger system prompt explaining this setup in general. When I send a message it’s an instant interrupt to Claude Code’s process, just like in the terminal. Voice notes are seamlessly transcribed with a local Whisper model. Images are used with multimodal reading in an isolated parallel session. Multiple groups running in parallel so I can work on all projects at the same time. No cross-talking, everything has an isolated context and history. And because it’s local on my own machine: Everything is REAL. The browser is REAL. I am connected as myself on it to all services because I actually use it in real life. Claude has unlimited internet access, just like humans who use actual browsers. It utilizes custom-made browser tools that I made to control any browser session it wants. Depending on the situation, it can either connect to my existing session or create one for its own. (You can tell it ‘look at my browser for a sec’ then talk about the current page you are on and it just works, pretty cool) My custom browser tools are not perfect (not by a long shot) but I managed to make them work well to the point they are somewhat reliable. This gives Claude full access to my real creds and all the services I actually use. I’m productive AS HELL with this. It really feels like a personal assistant. I ask it to read my emails and msgs, check x .com for news, research arxiv papers, write code, run experiments for me, investigate and reverse engineer github repos, even use my credit card and order things. [I try not to do this one a lot lol so far no disasters]. All from my phone. Super convenient. This is not a product or an open source project (maybe soon of it will make sense). This is just an ugly script I hacked the entire thing is ~600 lines. (ok maybe i did look at the code, but i swear i didn’t edit!) You can also vibe code this from scratch pretty fast and it will probably even end up better. This is just a cool thing so I’m sharing. It is a real speed booster for many things I do on daily basis, mostly boring things. Forcing my routine into some new “agent platform” just didn’t feel right for me. WhatsApp is where I already communicate and look for messages, so I decided that my agents will live there too. AGI in my pocket 24/7.
0:52

Ever since I wired Claude Code to WhatsApp 3 weeks ago, I built a stupidly large infra around it. I mean, opus built it. No clue how the code even looks. The entire thing was vibe coded using my phone. I wanted to see how far I could push it without touching the computer. Everything via WhatsApp. Build what I need on the fly. So the resulting infrastructure will already be battle tested for software development. The entire thing was streamlined with nearly no manual interventions, everything was communicated via WhatsApp using a single script establishing this connection. If the script is down, I need to get home to start it again to resume the development. Claude was upgrading it, debugging it, restarting it while maintaining constant uptime so it could keep communicating with me. I stressed Claude about it, telling it that it will be “in the dark” and other words that deliberately sound scary about losing communications if the script dies. I also refused git and refused cloning the code, I wanted to see Claude adapting to work on a *LIVING* system. The way this whole thing works: Claude has its own dedicated phone number that I am paying for. A real WhatsApp account for it is installed on a real iPhone that is sitting on my desk. All is registered under my name, this is legit setup with no hacks and tricks. I’ve set up a WhatsApp “Community” and multiple different groups under it. Both me and Claude are the admins, so Claude could edit it on my behalf. Each group is a project I am working on and has its own isolated context. The Group description is a system prompt that gets auto-appended to the larger system prompt explaining this setup in general. When I send a message it’s an instant interrupt to Claude Code’s process, just like in the terminal. Voice notes are seamlessly transcribed with a local Whisper model. Images are used with multimodal reading in an isolated parallel session. Multiple groups running in parallel so I can work on all projects at the same time. No cross-talking, everything has an isolated context and history. And because it’s local on my own machine: Everything is REAL. The browser is REAL. I am connected as myself on it to all services because I actually use it in real life. Claude has unlimited internet access, just like humans who use actual browsers. It utilizes custom-made browser tools that I made to control any browser session it wants. Depending on the situation, it can either connect to my existing session or create one for its own. (You can tell it ‘look at my browser for a sec’ then talk about the current page you are on and it just works, pretty cool) My custom browser tools are not perfect (not by a long shot) but I managed to make them work well to the point they are somewhat reliable. This gives Claude full access to my real creds and all the services I actually use. I’m productive AS HELL with this. It really feels like a personal assistant. I ask it to read my emails and msgs, check x .com for news, research arxiv papers, write code, run experiments for me, investigate and reverse engineer github repos, even use my credit card and order things. [I try not to do this one a lot lol so far no disasters]. All from my phone. Super convenient. This is not a product or an open source project (maybe soon of it will make sense). This is just an ugly script I hacked the entire thing is ~600 lines. (ok maybe i did look at the code, but i swear i didn’t edit!) You can also vibe code this from scratch pretty fast and it will probably even end up better. This is just a cool thing so I’m sharing. It is a real speed booster for many things I do on daily basis, mostly boring things. Forcing my routine into some new “agent platform” just didn’t feel right for me. WhatsApp is where I already communicate and look for messages, so I decided that my agents will live there too. AGI in my pocket 24/7.

Yam Peleg

420,060 次观看 • 8 个月前

7 years of trading options. Lost over $30,000. Blown accounts I can't even count. There was a point I seriously considered quitting forever. I was making less than $ 30k at my 9-5. Struggling financially. Struggling mentally. Trading was supposed to be the way out. Instead it became the thing that was destroying me. I remember one point, it was 2am. I was staring at my brokerage screen after blowing $500 on a revenge trade. Kept refreshing hoping the number would change. It never did. Too embarrassed to tell anyone. Dodging family questions. Starting to wonder if maybe I just wasn't smart enough. Maybe these traders on social media had something I didn't. I tried everything. Every YouTube strategy. Every Discord. Spent thousands on courses. Scalping. Swing trading. Signals. Indicators. All of it. Every time - further in the hole. Then one January morning. Down $4,000 year to date. Sat on the edge of my bed, head in my hands. Told myself I was done. And then I realized something. I had been treating trading like gambling. Forcing trades. Oversizing. Chasing. Revenge trading. I scrapped everything. Started over with tiny positions and a checklist . One rule: if a trade doesn't meet every condition, I don't take it. Doesn't matter how good it looks. The edge was being boringly selective, not finding a better setup. That's when everything changed. 7 years later. I'm consistently profitable. I still have a full-time job (a better one now). The centerpiece of that checklist is something most retail traders have never heard of. It's called GEX - Gamma Exposure. Every time you buy an options contract, someone has to be on the other side of that trade. That someone is almost always a market maker - firms like Citadel, SIG, Wolverine. They don't want directional risk. They just want to collect the spread. So the moment they sell you that contract, they immediately go into the market and hedge their position by buying or selling the underlying shares. That hedging is not optional. They have to do it. Continuously. All day long. As price moves. At certain price levels there is a massive concentration of forced buying or forced selling from those dealers. Price reacts to those levels because dealers are mechanically obligated to transact there. That's a GEX level. Not a line you drew on a chart. Not a pattern you spotted. A level backed by real institutional positioning data. I pull the GEX map every single morning using ITMatrix HQ before I open a single chart. It shows me exactly where the major levels are, what kind of environment I'm trading in, and where the clean air is between levels. So instead of guessing where price might react - I know where it has to. Because it almost always behaves the exact same way! But GEX is only one piece of it. The checklist has four components total. And all four have to be green before I place a single trade. Miss one - I wait. That's what makes it an A+ setup. I used it to turn $1,000 into $21,000, and I consistently collect around 5k every month from trading alone! If all this sounds complicated, watch the video below. The checklist is FREE btw - I recently turned it into a web app find it in the comments below ↓
23:11

7 years of trading options. Lost over $30,000. Blown accounts I can't even count. There was a point I seriously considered quitting forever. I was making less than $ 30k at my 9-5. Struggling financially. Struggling mentally. Trading was supposed to be the way out. Instead it became the thing that was destroying me. I remember one point, it was 2am. I was staring at my brokerage screen after blowing $500 on a revenge trade. Kept refreshing hoping the number would change. It never did. Too embarrassed to tell anyone. Dodging family questions. Starting to wonder if maybe I just wasn't smart enough. Maybe these traders on social media had something I didn't. I tried everything. Every YouTube strategy. Every Discord. Spent thousands on courses. Scalping. Swing trading. Signals. Indicators. All of it. Every time - further in the hole. Then one January morning. Down $4,000 year to date. Sat on the edge of my bed, head in my hands. Told myself I was done. And then I realized something. I had been treating trading like gambling. Forcing trades. Oversizing. Chasing. Revenge trading. I scrapped everything. Started over with tiny positions and a checklist . One rule: if a trade doesn't meet every condition, I don't take it. Doesn't matter how good it looks. The edge was being boringly selective, not finding a better setup. That's when everything changed. 7 years later. I'm consistently profitable. I still have a full-time job (a better one now). The centerpiece of that checklist is something most retail traders have never heard of. It's called GEX - Gamma Exposure. Every time you buy an options contract, someone has to be on the other side of that trade. That someone is almost always a market maker - firms like Citadel, SIG, Wolverine. They don't want directional risk. They just want to collect the spread. So the moment they sell you that contract, they immediately go into the market and hedge their position by buying or selling the underlying shares. That hedging is not optional. They have to do it. Continuously. All day long. As price moves. At certain price levels there is a massive concentration of forced buying or forced selling from those dealers. Price reacts to those levels because dealers are mechanically obligated to transact there. That's a GEX level. Not a line you drew on a chart. Not a pattern you spotted. A level backed by real institutional positioning data. I pull the GEX map every single morning using ITMatrix HQ before I open a single chart. It shows me exactly where the major levels are, what kind of environment I'm trading in, and where the clean air is between levels. So instead of guessing where price might react - I know where it has to. Because it almost always behaves the exact same way! But GEX is only one piece of it. The checklist has four components total. And all four have to be green before I place a single trade. Miss one - I wait. That's what makes it an A+ setup. I used it to turn $1,000 into $21,000, and I consistently collect around 5k every month from trading alone! If all this sounds complicated, watch the video below. The checklist is FREE btw - I recently turned it into a web app find it in the comments below ↓

Nick Ireland

27,139 次观看 • 3 个月前

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️
2:34

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,969 次观看 • 2 年前

Yesterday i publicly deposited $100 to a new wallet and asked Claude Fable 5 to double it on risk free arbitrage. Today it's sitting at $1,787.21 made overnight. I went through every code line and was shocked. It used just one formula to make 17x in one day: YES + NO Run the bot on a VPS close to the exchange instead of your laptop > Keep WebSocket connections alive instead of reconnecting every loop > Cache market metadata in memory and only update prices > Prepare both orders before the opportunity exists That last one changed everything. Most bots see YES + NO < $1, then build the trade. Mine already has the orders ready. When the spread appears, it only checks liquidity and submits both legs. No rebuilding. No unnecessary calculations. Just execution. Will you beat firms with million-dollar low-latency infrastructure? Probably not. But you don't need to. Most developers lose opportunities long before network latency becomes the bottleneck. They lose them inside their own code. Claude Fable 5 didn't give me a smarter strategy. It taught me how to stop wasting milliseconds. And in arbitrage, that's often the only edge that matters. Make sure to explain it to Claude if you wanna rebuild the same one. Leaving a full guide with every aspect covered below.
0:43

Yesterday i publicly deposited $100 to a new wallet and asked Claude Fable 5 to double it on risk free arbitrage. Today it's sitting at $1,787.21 made overnight. I went through every code line and was shocked. It used just one formula to make 17x in one day: YES + NO Run the bot on a VPS close to the exchange instead of your laptop > Keep WebSocket connections alive instead of reconnecting every loop > Cache market metadata in memory and only update prices > Prepare both orders before the opportunity exists That last one changed everything. Most bots see YES + NO < $1, then build the trade. Mine already has the orders ready. When the spread appears, it only checks liquidity and submits both legs. No rebuilding. No unnecessary calculations. Just execution. Will you beat firms with million-dollar low-latency infrastructure? Probably not. But you don't need to. Most developers lose opportunities long before network latency becomes the bottleneck. They lose them inside their own code. Claude Fable 5 didn't give me a smarter strategy. It taught me how to stop wasting milliseconds. And in arbitrage, that's often the only edge that matters. Make sure to explain it to Claude if you wanna rebuild the same one. Leaving a full guide with every aspect covered below.

Oracle Boar

102,357 次观看 • 1 个月前