正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

I am hooked on Dynamic Workflows! The idea of generating harnesses on the fly is so compelling that I reverse-engineered it for my agent orchestrator. And then I built a monitoring dashboard (as an HTML artifact) to track tasks, metrics, and reports. I can now use and monitor dynamic... workflows in my agent orchestrator with coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, Pi, and even my own custom-built DAIR.AI agent. This is clearly the future of working with agents to accomplish complex, long-running tasks. Some use cases I'm having success with: - Branching deep research tasks (with verification) - Parallel deep research tasks - Session mining of all my agent sessions - Bug hunting - Triaging - Fact-checking - LLM councils - AI simulations - Data synthesis - Evals generation ... and many others Dynamic workflows, like agent skills, feel like an important primitive to not only get the most out of agents but also incorporate dynamic behaviors and important components like cooperation and verification. There is so much exploration ground here. The exciting part is that this is not limited to coding tasks; it extends to business use cases and many other technical domains like science and research.show more

elvis

311,055 subscribers

102,878 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

ChatGPT Deep Research is one of the most useful AI agents out there. I use it for complex tasks, so it's one of the top AI products I get value from. I finally got to record how I use it and how to best leverage OpenAI's Deep Research. Enjoy! (bookmark it)

ChatGPT Deep Research is one of the most useful AI agents out there. I use it for complex tasks, so it's one of the top AI products I get value from. I finally got to record how I use it and how to best leverage OpenAI's Deep Research. Enjoy! (bookmark it)

elvis

65,442 次观看 • 1 年前

Important new course: Agent Skills with Anthropic, built with Anthropic and taught by Elie Schoppik! Skills are constructed as folders of instructions that equip agents with on-demand knowledge and workflows. This short course teaches you how to create them following best practices. Because skills follow an open standard format, you can build them once and deploy across any skills-compatible agent, like Claude Code. What you'll learn: - Create custom skills for code generation and review, data analysis, and research - Build complex workflows using Anthropic's pre-built skills (Excel, PowerPoint, skill creation) and custom skills - Combine skills with MCP and subagents to create agentic systems with specialized knowledge - Deploy the same skills across Claude Code, the Claude API, and the Claude Agent SDK Join and learn to equip agents with the specialized knowledge they need for reliable, repeatable workflows.

Important new course: Agent Skills with Anthropic, built with Anthropic and taught by Elie Schoppik! Skills are constructed as folders of instructions that equip agents with on-demand knowledge and workflows. This short course teaches you how to create them following best practices. Because skills follow an open standard format, you can build them once and deploy across any skills-compatible agent, like Claude Code. What you'll learn: - Create custom skills for code generation and review, data analysis, and research - Build complex workflows using Anthropic's pre-built skills (Excel, PowerPoint, skill creation) and custom skills - Combine skills with MCP and subagents to create agentic systems with specialized knowledge - Deploy the same skills across Claude Code, the Claude API, and the Claude Agent SDK Join and learn to equip agents with the specialized knowledge they need for reliable, repeatable workflows.

Andrew Ng

887,971 次观看 • 5 个月前

I tried jack's Buzz. It's like Slack + OpenClaw + Herdr + but with some really unique features that people are sleeping on. The video below shows how it works, and some of my thoughts on the process and platform, e.g.: - Create and interact with agents on top of any harness (claude code, codex, pi, etc.) - Choose which models agents use, including local ones - Agents can delegate work and work in parallel in git worktrees - Agents are first-class citizens and work like humans (creating channels, delegating, access to chat history) - You can share AI compute within a community - It's completely open-source and decentralized Things I like: - Delegating work in chat feels natural: tag an agent, it replies in a thread with status updates as it e.g. compiles, commits, and deploys. - Shared compute: relay owners can share local compute with members, so a community could pool funds for one beefy machine running a local model and everyone uses it. - It's built on Nostr, an open protocol already tied into Bitcoin Lightning so I can imagine communities tipping each other or paying for compute/agent tasks with instant zero-fee micropayments in the future. - It ties together things like OpenClaw, an agent manager, and Slack-style chat into one tool. Things I didn't like: - You can't see what the agent is doing in a terminal. The activity view exists, but if you're used to watching a session run, this UI feels a bit abstracted. A terminal view would be great. - It feels slower than running a session in Claude Code, though no evidence to back that up. For that reason I found myself doing one-off tasks in the terminal instead. Verdict: - I really like it so far and can genuinely imagine working with a team this way. - It doesn't feel ready for big, complex tasks yet. For shallower tasks, it's perfect. - The shared compute + Nostr/Lightning angle is what really separates it from every other agent manager for me, and I think that future is coming.

I tried jack's Buzz. It's like Slack + OpenClaw + Herdr + but with some really unique features that people are sleeping on. The video below shows how it works, and some of my thoughts on the process and platform, e.g.: - Create and interact with agents on top of any harness (claude code, codex, pi, etc.) - Choose which models agents use, including local ones - Agents can delegate work and work in parallel in git worktrees - Agents are first-class citizens and work like humans (creating channels, delegating, access to chat history) - You can share AI compute within a community - It's completely open-source and decentralized Things I like: - Delegating work in chat feels natural: tag an agent, it replies in a thread with status updates as it e.g. compiles, commits, and deploys. - Shared compute: relay owners can share local compute with members, so a community could pool funds for one beefy machine running a local model and everyone uses it. - It's built on Nostr, an open protocol already tied into Bitcoin Lightning so I can imagine communities tipping each other or paying for compute/agent tasks with instant zero-fee micropayments in the future. - It ties together things like OpenClaw, an agent manager, and Slack-style chat into one tool. Things I didn't like: - You can't see what the agent is doing in a terminal. The activity view exists, but if you're used to watching a session run, this UI feels a bit abstracted. A terminal view would be great. - It feels slower than running a session in Claude Code, though no evidence to back that up. For that reason I found myself doing one-off tasks in the terminal instead. Verdict: - I really like it so far and can genuinely imagine working with a team this way. - It doesn't feel ready for big, complex tasks yet. For shallower tasks, it's perfect. - The shared compute + Nostr/Lightning angle is what really separates it from every other agent manager for me, and I think that future is coming.

Vinny

1,055,795 次观看 • 2 天前

YT Podcast → LLM Artifact This is now my favorite way to consume podcasts. Knowledge artifacts generated by agents. The agent (Opus 4.7) spots important insights, does deep analysis, and generates thought-provoking observations that really get me curious to research further. All the research goes into a self-improving wiki for later use by any of my agents. I am using Elevenlabs Scribe for diarization. Skills and scripts to guide the artifact generation. Artifacts are just plain HTML + JS (e.g., chart.js). You can go further on anything by selecting text and components (charts) and doing deeper research, as I show in the clip. I expect more people to use agents in this way.

YT Podcast → LLM Artifact This is now my favorite way to consume podcasts. Knowledge artifacts generated by agents. The agent (Opus 4.7) spots important insights, does deep analysis, and generates thought-provoking observations that really get me curious to research further. All the research goes into a self-improving wiki for later use by any of my agents. I am using Elevenlabs Scribe for diarization. Skills and scripts to guide the artifact generation. Artifacts are just plain HTML + JS (e.g., chart.js). You can go further on anything by selecting text and components (charts) and doing deeper research, as I show in the clip. I expect more people to use agents in this way.

elvis

31,855 次观看 • 3 个月前

You can create an AI Agent that answers your email with a few clicks. 1. Go to ChatLLM ( 2. Click on AI Engineer 3. Select Create an AI Agent 4. Choose the Email Answering Agent ChatLLM will do the rest: it will code, test, and deploy the agent for you. You can also create a custom agent in English. The Agent Economy is coming (somebody should write a book and use this title.) We are going to see examples like this, times 1,000 in 2025. Just think about how many repetitive tasks you perform every day. Some of these tasks are involved enough that we couldn't automate them with pre-AI solutions. That's where we'll see agents explode, and I'm here for it.

You can create an AI Agent that answers your email with a few clicks. 1. Go to ChatLLM ( 2. Click on AI Engineer 3. Select Create an AI Agent 4. Choose the Email Answering Agent ChatLLM will do the rest: it will code, test, and deploy the agent for you. You can also create a custom agent in English. The Agent Economy is coming (somebody should write a book and use this title.) We are going to see examples like this, times 1,000 in 2025. Just think about how many repetitive tasks you perform every day. Some of these tasks are involved enough that we couldn't automate them with pre-AI solutions. That's where we'll see agents explode, and I'm here for it.

Santiago

79,974 次观看 • 1 年前

Loop engineering is great until something breaks. Here is how I improve the reliability of my agentic loops. I use human-in-the-loop (HITL). It's easy and extremely effective. Anyone can build this. My setup: I recorded a quick demo of how it all works. I shared recently that I now use more voice agents to build and communicate with agents. I also use them to verify. I hate the idea of being tied down to my computer or in a Slack channel to communicate with my agents. Here is what I have done to streamline communication with my agents. All my Claude and Codex agent sessions now use the Dial MCP server. It has a bunch of tools and provisions my agents with their own number that can place calls as native tools, with voice, SMS, and iMessage behind one interface. As my loops/automations work on PRs and new features, my agents escalate decisions to me via a short phone call. This is extremely useful when I am on the road or away from my desk. If you want to try this with Claude Code or Codex, paste this into your agent and get started right away: "Get yourself a Dial phone number and call me. Say hello and that setup is working, then hang up. Follow Natan Voitenkov and team are building something special here. Go check them out. Give your agent a phone number now: ($5 free credit)

Loop engineering is great until something breaks. Here is how I improve the reliability of my agentic loops. I use human-in-the-loop (HITL). It's easy and extremely effective. Anyone can build this. My setup: I recorded a quick demo of how it all works. I shared recently that I now use more voice agents to build and communicate with agents. I also use them to verify. I hate the idea of being tied down to my computer or in a Slack channel to communicate with my agents. Here is what I have done to streamline communication with my agents. All my Claude and Codex agent sessions now use the Dial MCP server. It has a bunch of tools and provisions my agents with their own number that can place calls as native tools, with voice, SMS, and iMessage behind one interface. As my loops/automations work on PRs and new features, my agents escalate decisions to me via a short phone call. This is extremely useful when I am on the road or away from my desk. If you want to try this with Claude Code or Codex, paste this into your agent and get started right away: "Get yourself a Dial phone number and call me. Say hello and that setup is working, then hang up. Follow Natan Voitenkov and team are building something special here. Go check them out. Give your agent a phone number now: ($5 free credit)

elvis

15,295 次观看 • 19 天前

HERMES AGENT IS STARTING TO FEEL LIKE A DIFFERENT CATEGORY OF AI TOOL. Not just a chatbot or a coding assistant, but a server side agent that remembers workflows, builds skills, and gets better the more you use it.

HERMES AGENT IS STARTING TO FEEL LIKE A DIFFERENT CATEGORY OF AI TOOL. Not just a chatbot or a coding assistant, but a server side agent that remembers workflows, builds skills, and gets better the more you use it.

0xMarioNawfal

49,497 次观看 • 2 个月前

It is now way easier to build multi-agent workflows in n8n with the new AI Agent Tool node. Instead of juggling sub workflows a parent AI Agent can now use other Agents as tools even several layers deep. Max shows how a cheap GPT 4.1 nano Agent handles heavy data and sends summaries to a parent Agent saving token costs and making debugging simpler. Watch the full walkthrough:

It is now way easier to build multi-agent workflows in n8n with the new AI Agent Tool node. Instead of juggling sub workflows a parent AI Agent can now use other Agents as tools even several layers deep. Max shows how a cheap GPT 4.1 nano Agent handles heavy data and sends summaries to a parent Agent saving token costs and making debugging simpler. Watch the full walkthrough:

n8n.io

27,766 次观看 • 11 个月前

arXiv Papers → LLM Artifacts This is how I keep up with AI research now. It's like having access to the most personalized arXiv feed. Automations run everyday to curate papers based a set of rules and insights. Curated papers are indexed and power the artifacts. Agent convert papers to LLM wikis (based on Andrej Karpathy idea), which means insights are indexed and easily searchable and reusable. I feel like LLM Artifacts is the natural evolution to LLM Wikis. It's about making that knowledge actionable. Artifacts are customizable via agents. Artifacts can interact with agents and are dynamic in nature. Anything can be injected into the artifact as needed (insights, components, suggested experiments, action items, etc). I can take action on Artifact items with my agent orchestrator (Electron app). So I can ask questions about any paper and automate experiments in the background right from within the artifact. This is more than a visual. It's not a single prompt. It's several proactive agents coordinating to surface interesting facts, knowledge, and insights that I can act on a researcher. Agents are not just for generating useful artifacts, they are useful to keep learning and staying on the cutting edge of knowledge. Stay tuned for more.

arXiv Papers → LLM Artifacts This is how I keep up with AI research now. It's like having access to the most personalized arXiv feed. Automations run everyday to curate papers based a set of rules and insights. Curated papers are indexed and power the artifacts. Agent convert papers to LLM wikis (based on Andrej Karpathy idea), which means insights are indexed and easily searchable and reusable. I feel like LLM Artifacts is the natural evolution to LLM Wikis. It's about making that knowledge actionable. Artifacts are customizable via agents. Artifacts can interact with agents and are dynamic in nature. Anything can be injected into the artifact as needed (insights, components, suggested experiments, action items, etc). I can take action on Artifact items with my agent orchestrator (Electron app). So I can ask questions about any paper and automate experiments in the background right from within the artifact. This is more than a visual. It's not a single prompt. It's several proactive agents coordinating to surface interesting facts, knowledge, and insights that I can act on a researcher. Agents are not just for generating useful artifacts, they are useful to keep learning and staying on the cutting edge of knowledge. Stay tuned for more.

elvis

59,063 次观看 • 2 个月前

LLM Wikis are being slept on. I argue that creating knowledge bases with LLMs or coding agents is one of the most valuable applications of AI today. It's about being intentional in building and scaling your intelligence stack. To showcase this, I wanted to share an LLM Wiki I have built over the last couple of months. It's called PaperWiki, and I use it across all my research workflows, along with my research agents. In fact, I also use it to curate papers I share with my communities, newsletter, and on X. The PaperWiki is updated regularly with automations, so I basically have agents on a loop maintaining it. All the entries are ingested from different sources and stored in a vault (Obsidian) and further indexed using qmd. And then further presented via an HTML artifact. So all of it is easily accessible to all my agents and easily searchable through full-text search and rich semantic search. The structure of the wiki has proven significantly useful to start interesting and exciting cutting-edge research projects with my research agents (from building tiny and more efficient gpt/difussion llms to building out SoTA harnesses and memory systems). It turns out that agents love markdown files and can more easily navigate the papers given the rich metadata structure of the wiki. I am just getting started on this, but it's clear to me that we should all be experimenting with LLM Wikis. Here's why: Building LLM knowledge bases gets you into the habit of leveraging AI outputs in all kinds of creative ways. It's the good kind of tokenmaxxing we should all be pushing for. LLM Wikis can be maintained automatically in a loop. I use an automation that updates the wiki every day based on papers I curate. The curation is another automation I run in a loop (with a bit of human in the loop), so I get to build on all my previous knowledge and expertise, and all of it compounds the deeper the integration/layers. One interesting result of this process is that I feel like I can better spot high-quality papers and remove noise more easily. Social media could never solve that. And most paper aggregators use metrics I simply don't trust. I like that agents can help with the noise vs. signal problem. This is important for research. Lots of people consider agents to produce mostly slop. But it doesn't have to be that way. Careful curations, prompts, automations, verifiers, and human-in-the-loop can produce some astonishing results. And you really don't need frontier models for this. I use a combination of frontier models (opus-4.8) and open-weight models (deepseek-v4-flash) to maintain this. An exciting future work (we are working on this DAIR.AI) is to tune specialized models on top of this to allow LLMs to quickly understand cutting-edge research ideas and can better conceptualize research strategies that further accelerate scientific research agents. I plan to open-source a bunch of this work, including the artifact, but this is currently work in progress, and I was excited to share some thoughts as I continue working on it. Sharing more as I go. Stay tuned!

LLM Wikis are being slept on. I argue that creating knowledge bases with LLMs or coding agents is one of the most valuable applications of AI today. It's about being intentional in building and scaling your intelligence stack. To showcase this, I wanted to share an LLM Wiki I have built over the last couple of months. It's called PaperWiki, and I use it across all my research workflows, along with my research agents. In fact, I also use it to curate papers I share with my communities, newsletter, and on X. The PaperWiki is updated regularly with automations, so I basically have agents on a loop maintaining it. All the entries are ingested from different sources and stored in a vault (Obsidian) and further indexed using qmd. And then further presented via an HTML artifact. So all of it is easily accessible to all my agents and easily searchable through full-text search and rich semantic search. The structure of the wiki has proven significantly useful to start interesting and exciting cutting-edge research projects with my research agents (from building tiny and more efficient gpt/difussion llms to building out SoTA harnesses and memory systems). It turns out that agents love markdown files and can more easily navigate the papers given the rich metadata structure of the wiki. I am just getting started on this, but it's clear to me that we should all be experimenting with LLM Wikis. Here's why: Building LLM knowledge bases gets you into the habit of leveraging AI outputs in all kinds of creative ways. It's the good kind of tokenmaxxing we should all be pushing for. LLM Wikis can be maintained automatically in a loop. I use an automation that updates the wiki every day based on papers I curate. The curation is another automation I run in a loop (with a bit of human in the loop), so I get to build on all my previous knowledge and expertise, and all of it compounds the deeper the integration/layers. One interesting result of this process is that I feel like I can better spot high-quality papers and remove noise more easily. Social media could never solve that. And most paper aggregators use metrics I simply don't trust. I like that agents can help with the noise vs. signal problem. This is important for research. Lots of people consider agents to produce mostly slop. But it doesn't have to be that way. Careful curations, prompts, automations, verifiers, and human-in-the-loop can produce some astonishing results. And you really don't need frontier models for this. I use a combination of frontier models (opus-4.8) and open-weight models (deepseek-v4-flash) to maintain this. An exciting future work (we are working on this DAIR.AI) is to tune specialized models on top of this to allow LLMs to quickly understand cutting-edge research ideas and can better conceptualize research strategies that further accelerate scientific research agents. I plan to open-source a bunch of this work, including the artifact, but this is currently work in progress, and I was excited to share some thoughts as I continue working on it. Sharing more as I go. Stay tuned!

elvis

55,179 次观看 • 24 天前

New agentic short course! Multi AI Agent Systems with crewAI, built with CrewAI's founder and CEO João Moura. In this course, you'll learn how to break down complex tasks into subtasks for multiple AI agents, each playing a specialized role, to execute. For example, to generate a research report, you might have researcher, writer, and quality assurance agents collaborate. You'll define the roles, expectations, and interactions between the agents—like a manager organizing a team. You'll work with key agentic AI techniques like role-playing, tool use, memory, guardrails, and cross-agent collaboration. And you'll build your own multi-agent systems that can tackle complex tasks. I think you'll find it both productive and fun to design agents and watch them collaborate to get things done. Let me know what you think! I believe multi-agent architectures will drive significant progress in AI systems. Please sign up here!

New agentic short course! Multi AI Agent Systems with crewAI, built with CrewAI's founder and CEO João Moura. In this course, you'll learn how to break down complex tasks into subtasks for multiple AI agents, each playing a specialized role, to execute. For example, to generate a research report, you might have researcher, writer, and quality assurance agents collaborate. You'll define the roles, expectations, and interactions between the agents—like a manager organizing a team. You'll work with key agentic AI techniques like role-playing, tool use, memory, guardrails, and cross-agent collaboration. And you'll build your own multi-agent systems that can tackle complex tasks. I think you'll find it both productive and fun to design agents and watch them collaborate to get things done. Let me know what you think! I believe multi-agent architectures will drive significant progress in AI systems. Please sign up here!

Andrew Ng

349,977 次观看 • 2 年前

Just gave a demo at Every 📧's Vibe Code Camp showing how I use a kanban board to stay sane while overseeing Claude Code agents😎 Here's a quick recap video showing the whole flow: 1) Monitor progress on all tasks in one view 2) See when Claude is blocked, and respond in context 3) Read Claude's plans with nice formatting, not raw Markdown 4) Use AI to process voice notes into structured tasks 5) Get explanations of code changes... with an interactive quiz to check if you understood 🙃 I've had mixed feelings about kanban workflows in the past, but as the agents get stronger I'm warming up to them—especially for churning through small well-specified tasks. In that context, it feels like the challenge is managing my working memory for what's going on. And having a stable "zoomed-out map" of all the tasks really helps me with offloading some of that cognitive load to a visualization of everything that's going on!

Just gave a demo at Every 📧's Vibe Code Camp showing how I use a kanban board to stay sane while overseeing Claude Code agents😎 Here's a quick recap video showing the whole flow: 1) Monitor progress on all tasks in one view 2) See when Claude is blocked, and respond in context 3) Read Claude's plans with nice formatting, not raw Markdown 4) Use AI to process voice notes into structured tasks 5) Get explanations of code changes... with an interactive quiz to check if you understood 🙃 I've had mixed feelings about kanban workflows in the past, but as the agents get stronger I'm warming up to them—especially for churning through small well-specified tasks. In that context, it feels like the challenge is managing my working memory for what's going on. And having a stable "zoomed-out map" of all the tasks really helps me with offloading some of that cognitive load to a visualization of everything that's going on!

Geoffrey Litt

78,178 次观看 • 6 个月前

I shot this video last week to onboard a new set of alpha customers to Notion Custom Agents. Figured I should just put it out here so you can follow along the latest and greatest. It's so cool to see all the things people are building with it. You can see some of my own use cases here: (0:00) Intro to custom agents Starting with personal use cases (1:00) Building a mail triage agent (5:00) Creating a prep doc for all my daily meetings (6:45) Generating a daily report that helps me catch up with multiple slack channels Switching to company use cases (8:30) Agent that automatically answers questions in a slack channel and files tasks when necessary (10:30) Agent that auto-routes product feedback to the right team channel and task db. And it does this with routing rules, that it wrote itself. (12:40) Build your own agent. Let your imaginations run wild! Send us feedback! The product is rolling out quickly, and everyone should have access in the next couple weeks.

I shot this video last week to onboard a new set of alpha customers to Notion Custom Agents. Figured I should just put it out here so you can follow along the latest and greatest. It's so cool to see all the things people are building with it. You can see some of my own use cases here: (0:00) Intro to custom agents Starting with personal use cases (1:00) Building a mail triage agent (5:00) Creating a prep doc for all my daily meetings (6:45) Generating a daily report that helps me catch up with multiple slack channels Switching to company use cases (8:30) Agent that automatically answers questions in a slack channel and files tasks when necessary (10:30) Agent that auto-routes product feedback to the right team channel and task db. And it does this with routing rules, that it wrote itself. (12:40) Build your own agent. Let your imaginations run wild! Send us feedback! The product is rolling out quickly, and everyone should have access in the next couple weeks.

Akshay Kothari

74,684 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 OpenAI just launched Codex, a brand-new autonomous coding agent that can build features and fix bugs on its own. We’ve been using it Every 📧 for a few days, and I’m impressed. I invited Alexander Embiricos (ben davies), a member of the product staff responsible for Codex, to demo Codex and talk about it live on a special edition of AI & I: What Codex is and how it works Codex is designed to be used by senior engineers—it performs coding tasks like adding features or fixing bugs autonomously. It's built to allow you to start many sessions at once, so you can have multiple agents working in parallel. Codex is built to have "taste" OpenAI trained Codex to have the taste of a senior software engineer. It knows how big codebases work, how to write a good PR, and uses clean, minimal code. Why an “abundance mindset” is best for interacting with agents Codex is designed to allow users to delegate many tasks at once without getting caught up in the details. This lets you point an abundance of agents at a specific task like a difficult bug—it’s worth it even if only one of them succeeds. How OpenAI is thinking about agents Codex is one piece of a unified super-assistant OpenAI wants to eventually build—an agent that helps users easily get things done by selecting the right tools for them behind the scenes. OpenAI’s vision for the future of programming In the future developers will probably spend less time writing routine code and more time guiding agents, reviewing their work, and making strategy decisions. Programming will become more social, letting teams easily delegate multiple tasks at once, allowing people to focus on ideas and collaboration instead of routine coding. Watch below!

Dan Shipper 📧

145,487 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥 Our latest LangChain Academy course – Deep Research with LangGraph – is now live! 🔥 Deep research agents are taking off – from major AI labs to companies building their own. Research is inherently open-ended. You can't always predict whether a question needs broad exploration or deep analysis. Agents excel here because they adapt on the fly, using each finding to decide where to dig next. Building these systems ourselves and with customers, we've learned that structure matters. The best research agents scope problems with users first. Then, they coordinate multiple specialists instead of overwhelming one generalist. LangGraph is built for these types of long-running, multi-agent workflows. Its persistence layer tracks progress across agents. LangSmith gives you the observability and evaluation tools you need to track and improve performance. In this course, you'll build and evaluate: - A user scoping agent to define research parameters - A multi-agent research team with supervisor - And add tool integration via MCP Enroll for free ➡️

🔥 Our latest LangChain Academy course – Deep Research with LangGraph – is now live! 🔥 Deep research agents are taking off – from major AI labs to companies building their own. Research is inherently open-ended. You can't always predict whether a question needs broad exploration or deep analysis. Agents excel here because they adapt on the fly, using each finding to decide where to dig next. Building these systems ourselves and with customers, we've learned that structure matters. The best research agents scope problems with users first. Then, they coordinate multiple specialists instead of overwhelming one generalist. LangGraph is built for these types of long-running, multi-agent workflows. Its persistence layer tracks progress across agents. LangSmith gives you the observability and evaluation tools you need to track and improve performance. In this course, you'll build and evaluate: - A user scoping agent to define research parameters - A multi-agent research team with supervisor - And add tool integration via MCP Enroll for free ➡️

LangChain

61,205 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 Secure OpenClaw - Message Your Custom AI Agent From Telegram We are excited for our first release of personal agents. You can now use Abacus AI's DeepAgent to vibe code a personal agent on Telegram Create and simply message the agent! - do tasks like respond to emails - schedule meetings - use the browser to book tickets - connect to your internal systems The agent runs on a secure environment with constraints and you can pretty much customize it exactly like you want it when you are building it This is just v1 - we are going to be launching something WAY more exciting soon

🚨 Secure OpenClaw - Message Your Custom AI Agent From Telegram We are excited for our first release of personal agents. You can now use Abacus AI's DeepAgent to vibe code a personal agent on Telegram Create and simply message the agent! - do tasks like respond to emails - schedule meetings - use the browser to book tickets - connect to your internal systems The agent runs on a secure environment with constraints and you can pretty much customize it exactly like you want it when you are building it This is just v1 - we are going to be launching something WAY more exciting soon

Bindu Reddy

10,702 次观看 • 5 个月前

The single-agent paradigm is obsolete. I’ve been testing LobeHub, and I have to say: LobeHub is the next generation of agent harness. Anyone can effortlessly build and team up with agent coworkers to deliver complex, systematic work.Manus and Claude Cowork stop at L3; LobeHub moves agents to L4. As shown in the video, the performance gap is significant: Vs Manus: LobeHub is ~3x faster and ~6.5x cheaper on complex tasks like Paper Analysis. Vs Claude Cowork: You get full multi-model support. Switch between Gemini, GPT, and Claude instantly without vendor lock-in. Through lobeHub community, anyone can discover, reuse and remix agent teammates and agent groups — customizing them to fit their own workflows and needs. As shown in the video: find a People Search agent in the community, remix the prompt, and swap the tools to level it up. Then you can paste an arXiv link → extract authors → find contacts → send outreach. Useful for VCs, HRs, and sales in talent sourcing. With 70k+ GitHub stars, 14k forks, 6M downloads, this is the new standard for autonomous workflows.

The single-agent paradigm is obsolete. I’ve been testing LobeHub, and I have to say: LobeHub is the next generation of agent harness. Anyone can effortlessly build and team up with agent coworkers to deliver complex, systematic work.Manus and Claude Cowork stop at L3; LobeHub moves agents to L4. As shown in the video, the performance gap is significant: Vs Manus: LobeHub is ~3x faster and ~6.5x cheaper on complex tasks like Paper Analysis. Vs Claude Cowork: You get full multi-model support. Switch between Gemini, GPT, and Claude instantly without vendor lock-in. Through lobeHub community, anyone can discover, reuse and remix agent teammates and agent groups — customizing them to fit their own workflows and needs. As shown in the video: find a People Search agent in the community, remix the prompt, and swap the tools to level it up. Then you can paste an arXiv link → extract authors → find contacts → send outreach. Useful for VCs, HRs, and sales in talent sourcing. With 70k+ GitHub stars, 14k forks, 6M downloads, this is the new standard for autonomous workflows.

Chubby♨️

13,277 次观看 • 6 个月前

working with cloud agents in cursor feels the same as local, but the fact that i can shut down my computer and still have it running is amazing. one of my favorite use cases is planning in cursor, then send off to cloud agent for impl. here's a short demo

working with cloud agents in cursor feels the same as local, but the fact that i can shut down my computer and still have it running is amazing. one of my favorite use cases is planning in cursor, then send off to cloud agent for impl. here's a short demo

eric zakariasson

61,940 次观看 • 8 个月前

THIS GUY IS RUNNING A 5-AGENT OPENCLAW TEAM 24/7 FOR UNDER $50 A MONTH five agents all running continuously and handing tasks to each other > research agent tracking trends and competitors > writing agent handling marketing content and drafts > ops agent managing emails and scheduling > monitoring agent watching for alerts and updates > coordinator agent routing tasks between all of them and he built a full 3D isometric office where you can watch all of them work in real time and see the current task that each agent is doing each agent has a character, a desk, and a name tag. when it's time for a standup, they walk to the meeting room and gather which is insane it even has voice connection. you can talk to the agents through speech-to-text and tell them what to do out loud it's a tiny autonomous team that runs itself. the coordinator decides who handles what and tasks get passed between agents automatically. it never stops and runs 24/7 all for less than $50/month. we went from AI tools a few months back to AI employees real fast

THIS GUY IS RUNNING A 5-AGENT OPENCLAW TEAM 24/7 FOR UNDER $50 A MONTH five agents all running continuously and handing tasks to each other > research agent tracking trends and competitors > writing agent handling marketing content and drafts > ops agent managing emails and scheduling > monitoring agent watching for alerts and updates > coordinator agent routing tasks between all of them and he built a full 3D isometric office where you can watch all of them work in real time and see the current task that each agent is doing each agent has a character, a desk, and a name tag. when it's time for a standup, they walk to the meeting room and gather which is insane it even has voice connection. you can talk to the agents through speech-to-text and tell them what to do out loud it's a tiny autonomous team that runs itself. the coordinator decides who handles what and tasks get passed between agents automatically. it never stops and runs 24/7 all for less than $50/month. we went from AI tools a few months back to AI employees real fast

Om Patel

27,131 次观看 • 3 个月前

I made an AI data science team with Python. I'm excited to share my new project, the AI Data Science Team, a Python package for creating AI co-pilots and agents to assist in common data science tasks. I walk you through the GitHub page, showcasing the progress and potential of this project. I'll explain how these agents can streamline tasks like code generation and modeling pipeline creation, making data science projects more efficient. Introduction to AI Data Science Team Project Integrating Human-in-the-Loop Example: Accessing Agents for Feature Engineering Setting up Feature Engineering Agent Code On GitHub: Python AI-Tips Newsletter (stay updated as I build this project in the open):

I made an AI data science team with Python. I'm excited to share my new project, the AI Data Science Team, a Python package for creating AI co-pilots and agents to assist in common data science tasks. I walk you through the GitHub page, showcasing the progress and potential of this project. I'll explain how these agents can streamline tasks like code generation and modeling pipeline creation, making data science projects more efficient. Introduction to AI Data Science Team Project Integrating Human-in-the-Loop Example: Accessing Agents for Feature Engineering Setting up Feature Engineering Agent Code On GitHub: Python AI-Tips Newsletter (stay updated as I build this project in the open):

Matt Dancho (Business Science)

11,799 次观看 • 1 年前