Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

i built a codebase classifier with Jev and this might be the solution to overengineered code that agents create what should I test Jev on next?

96,541 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

23 Kommentare

Profilbild von vogel
vogelvor 2 Tagen

what should I try to build with Jev next?

Profilbild von Ceoz
Ceozvor 2 Tagen

Ok, that is ACTUALLY a pretty interesting concept.

Profilbild von Michael Vessia
Michael Vessiavor 2 Tagen

Looks interesting, I am currently using for cyclomatic/cognitive complexity, CRAP, etc. So this might be redundant, but fallow takes about 40s on my pretty small codebase so this might be quicker, will have to compare results if you publish.

Profilbild von Ishwar | Infrastructure Systems
Ishwar | Infrastructure Systemsvor 2 Tagen

Test it on a repo after 100+ agent-driven changes. The interesting question isn't whether Jev can spot bad code. It's whether it can find the complexity agents accumulate while each individual change looks reasonable.

Profilbild von Pythonics
Pythonicsvor 2 Tagen

Slop scoring text & sections of text as feedback to have the model iteratively improve writing, acting as a more reliable judge.

Profilbild von mackle
macklevor 2 Tagen

So kinda like SonarQube?

Profilbild von alias
aliasvor 2 Tagen

Damn, this is exactly what I needed to understand Jev. Thank you, man. Brilliant.

Profilbild von Shawki Sukkar
Shawki Sukkarvor 2 Tagen

Computer use

Profilbild von nin
ninvor 2 Tagen

Test Jev on day trading. Perhaps, for speed's sake, use historical data but anonymize the companies and dates.

Profilbild von Ted Kalaw
Ted Kalawvor 2 Tagen

done anything w scores? try doing a line break on blocks of text, prepending w the line number, and then asking questions that reference the line number you can make almost like gradients by line (or other block). there’s a p cool demo for this on the devsite i believe!

Profilbild von Krimo
Krimovor 2 Tagen

Send an invite please 😢

Profilbild von Dominik Vít
Dominik Vítvor 2 Tagen

Can you make it an MCP, plug it to OpenCode and let it refactor in a loop? Would love to see the results

Profilbild von Lauri Jutila
Lauri Jutilavor 2 Tagen

Very good ideas. Thanks for sharing!

Profilbild von Calliope
Calliopevor 2 Tagen

My thing I built it with big pickle

Profilbild von Harith Bakhrani
Harith Bakhranivor 2 Tagen

Throw it at a repo after 2 years of features. One where utils is a graveyard, the same API call exists 4 times, and half the types are any. If it can point to real duplicates and explain why they should be merged without trying to rewrite the whole thing, I’m interested.

Profilbild von Alek
Alekvor 2 Tagen

Ryan - test it on a legacy repo next?

Profilbild von Ofek Shaked | AI Engineer
Ofek Shaked | AI Engineervor 2 Tagen

Agents love extra folders for no reason. A cheap pass that flags "this is overbuilt" saves more time than another lint rule.

Profilbild von NAMAN RAJ
NAMAN RAJvor 2 Tagen

Good luck testing Jev's limits, Ryan! Can't wait to hear how it handles the AI equivalent of a teenager's first car 🚗💥

Profilbild von Yaya Soumah
Yaya Soumahvor 2 Tagen

This is super cool

Profilbild von shai granit
shai granitvor 2 Tagen

בנית מסווג עם Jev ושואל מה הלאה תבדוק אם הוא מתחיל להתנצל ברגע שהקלט נשמע כמו טיקט מלקוח

Profilbild von Rohan
Rohanvor 2 Tagen

Test it on the same feature implemented three ways: minimal, abstraction-heavy, and with deliberate dead paths. Expose the concrete signals behind each classification. A developer should be able to identify what to delete and review the score against the code.

Profilbild von pysolin
pysolinvor 2 Tagen

verify agentic payment transactions

Profilbild von Keegan Gaffney
Keegan Gaffneyvor 2 Tagen

Let it play Pokémon

Ähnliche Videos