Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I built a GPT that finds the best GPTs using data from 500+ submissions. Simply ask it: What's the best GPT for [x]. Link below!

240,282 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Rowan Cheung
Rowan Cheungvor 2 Jahren

Here's the link to try it:

Profilbild von Rowan Cheung
Rowan Cheungvor 2 Jahren

Also, here's the database in case you want to see a broader view of all the GPTs included:

Profilbild von Alex
Alexvor 2 Jahren

Wow. That is actually the best GPT I found yet. Thank you!

Profilbild von ChatGPT研究所
ChatGPT研究所vor 2 Jahren

Hi Rowan, I built a similar GPT and here it contained 5141 GPTs from all over the world😎

Profilbild von Shawn Chauhan
Shawn Chauhanvor 2 Jahren

This is awesome Rowan! Can’t believe it’s become so easy to make custom AI solution. Literally takes you a few seconds!

Profilbild von Clintin Lyle Kruger
Clintin Lyle Krugervor 2 Jahren

Fantastic, how can we submit our GPTs in your database Rowan?

Profilbild von Mysson AI Tips
Mysson AI Tipsvor 2 Jahren

Looks like someone ought to build this

Profilbild von Explorer_of_Imagination👑
Explorer_of_Imagination👑vor 2 Jahren

👏👏👏

Profilbild von Jake - Founder @ Chtrbx
Jake - Founder @ Chtrbxvor 2 Jahren

There we go! ;)

Profilbild von 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝔻𝕖 𝕊𝕠𝕦𝕤𝕒
𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝔻𝕖 𝕊𝕠𝕦𝕤𝕒vor 2 Jahren

Pity I can’t get an account! All because of my Cellphone network 🫣 Seems a bit short sighted.

Ähnliche Videos

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten