Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I built a GPT that finds the best GPTs using data from 500+ submissions. Simply ask it: What's the best GPT for [x]. Link below!

240,282 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Rowan Cheung
Rowan Cheung2 лет назад

Here's the link to try it:

Фото профиля Rowan Cheung
Rowan Cheung2 лет назад

Also, here's the database in case you want to see a broader view of all the GPTs included:

Фото профиля Alex
Alex2 лет назад

Wow. That is actually the best GPT I found yet. Thank you!

Фото профиля ChatGPT研究所
ChatGPT研究所2 лет назад

Hi Rowan, I built a similar GPT and here it contained 5141 GPTs from all over the world😎

Фото профиля Shawn Chauhan
Shawn Chauhan2 лет назад

This is awesome Rowan! Can’t believe it’s become so easy to make custom AI solution. Literally takes you a few seconds!

Фото профиля Clintin Lyle Kruger
Clintin Lyle Kruger2 лет назад

Fantastic, how can we submit our GPTs in your database Rowan?

Фото профиля Mysson AI Tips
Mysson AI Tips2 лет назад

Looks like someone ought to build this

Фото профиля Explorer_of_Imagination👑
Explorer_of_Imagination👑2 лет назад

👏👏👏

Фото профиля Jake - Founder @ Chtrbx
Jake - Founder @ Chtrbx2 лет назад

There we go! ;)

Фото профиля 𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝔻𝕖 𝕊𝕠𝕦𝕤𝕒
𝔾𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕥 𝔻𝕖 𝕊𝕠𝕦𝕤𝕒2 лет назад

Pity I can’t get an account! All because of my Cellphone network 🫣 Seems a bit short sighted.

Похожие видео

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,405 просмотров • 1 месяц назад