Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

I don't know what else I could have inserted longer than #Nothosaur #Alla Legendary Size Tentacle 🐙 dildo from my Wow King Size #GreedyHole 🕳️ 🤷🏻‍♂️🧐 ❤️X Lube Powder💦 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐚𝐮𝐫 DE GreedyCluster © Official Greedy Cluster © Pink To see more at #FistFuck #LooseHole #FF #拳交

🇨🇦Triple Fist Btm

23,104 subscribers

61,159 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #Nothosaur #Alla #GreedyHole #FistFuck #LooseHole #FF #拳交

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Stopped to grab lunch on my way to a meeting today, and one of the employees at Chick-fil-A immediately recognized me from X. He follows my content and refused to let me pay for my meal. He told me I’m a blessing to this country and appreciates what I do. Truthfully, he was the blessing today. There are so many things happening behind the scenes right now that I can’t share just yet, but I’m incredibly excited for what’s ahead. God continues to open doors I never could have opened myself, and every day I become more convinced that this journey has a purpose. Moments like this remind me why I spend countless hours creating content, speaking out, and fighting for the values we believe in. Thank you to every single person who follows, supports, encourages, and prays for me. I see you, and I appreciate you more than you know. The best is yet to come. 🇺🇸❤️

Stopped to grab lunch on my way to a meeting today, and one of the employees at Chick-fil-A immediately recognized me from X. He follows my content and refused to let me pay for my meal. He told me I’m a blessing to this country and appreciates what I do. Truthfully, he was the blessing today. There are so many things happening behind the scenes right now that I can’t share just yet, but I’m incredibly excited for what’s ahead. God continues to open doors I never could have opened myself, and every day I become more convinced that this journey has a purpose. Moments like this remind me why I spend countless hours creating content, speaking out, and fighting for the values we believe in. Thank you to every single person who follows, supports, encourages, and prays for me. I see you, and I appreciate you more than you know. The best is yet to come. 🇺🇸❤️

Bethany O’Leary 🇺🇸 🦅

68,138 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

😑 “You know, when I did the 250, there was nothing I could do. It was 250. It was 250. So I can't see -- that was my baby. The country happened to be 250 years old. But what I did do is during my first term, I got the Olympics, and I got the Great Soccer. You know that whole deal, right? I got -- we call it soccer. They call it football. I got them both. I got the Olympics. First, I got the Olympics, and I got it. I was president. And I said, you know, it's a shame. It's a shame. I got the World Cup, and I have the Olympics, and I did it. And you have no idea. President Obama didn't want to make a call to the Olympics. You know why? Because he went to Switzerland or wherever, and he said, you know, if a president goes to get the Olympics, you have to have a deal. You have to be chosen. He went there, and he came in fourth, so he hated them, I guess. And he was unwilling to make a call, and they called me up. The Democrats called me up, actually, from Los Angeles, and I said, I'll do it. I made the call, and I couldn't get the people off the phone because they were so starved for love, because nobody would call them from -- anyway, we made a deal. I got the Olympics. Then we got the World Cup with Johnny. We got the World Cup, and I got them both, and I looked at my people. I said, isn't it a shame? I got these two, but it wasn't in the next four years. It was right after that, and the one after that. And I got the Olympics, and I got the World Cup, and we also have 250, so that's a pretty wild term. But I got these two things that are incredible. Nobody else could have done it. I'm telling you, everybody wanted it. Nobody could have done it. And I said, and I won't be president, because I'll be president for four more years, but it won't be -- and then they cheated and rigged the election. They rigged -- you know, they don't even turn off the cameras when I say that now, because now they know it's true, too. But they knew it was true before. Remember, the cameras used to immediately turn off. You see all those beautiful red lights go off. Now I can say whatever I want, because then they know it's true. But they knew it was true before. It's fake news. That's why they call it. But you know what? This term is much more consequential than if I had done it the more traditional way. This was slightly harder, believe me. It's slightly more dangerous, because they're criminals on the other side that tried to put your president in jail and went after him, just like they do in third-world countries. And we all beat em together. We beat em because our level of popularity was so high.”

😑 “You know, when I did the 250, there was nothing I could do. It was 250. It was 250. So I can't see -- that was my baby. The country happened to be 250 years old. But what I did do is during my first term, I got the Olympics, and I got the Great Soccer. You know that whole deal, right? I got -- we call it soccer. They call it football. I got them both. I got the Olympics. First, I got the Olympics, and I got it. I was president. And I said, you know, it's a shame. It's a shame. I got the World Cup, and I have the Olympics, and I did it. And you have no idea. President Obama didn't want to make a call to the Olympics. You know why? Because he went to Switzerland or wherever, and he said, you know, if a president goes to get the Olympics, you have to have a deal. You have to be chosen. He went there, and he came in fourth, so he hated them, I guess. And he was unwilling to make a call, and they called me up. The Democrats called me up, actually, from Los Angeles, and I said, I'll do it. I made the call, and I couldn't get the people off the phone because they were so starved for love, because nobody would call them from -- anyway, we made a deal. I got the Olympics. Then we got the World Cup with Johnny. We got the World Cup, and I got them both, and I looked at my people. I said, isn't it a shame? I got these two, but it wasn't in the next four years. It was right after that, and the one after that. And I got the Olympics, and I got the World Cup, and we also have 250, so that's a pretty wild term. But I got these two things that are incredible. Nobody else could have done it. I'm telling you, everybody wanted it. Nobody could have done it. And I said, and I won't be president, because I'll be president for four more years, but it won't be -- and then they cheated and rigged the election. They rigged -- you know, they don't even turn off the cameras when I say that now, because now they know it's true, too. But they knew it was true before. Remember, the cameras used to immediately turn off. You see all those beautiful red lights go off. Now I can say whatever I want, because then they know it's true. But they knew it was true before. It's fake news. That's why they call it. But you know what? This term is much more consequential than if I had done it the more traditional way. This was slightly harder, believe me. It's slightly more dangerous, because they're criminals on the other side that tried to put your president in jail and went after him, just like they do in third-world countries. And we all beat em together. We beat em because our level of popularity was so high.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

2,109,128 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WATCH: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth addresses recent reporting on the USS Abraham Lincoln EDWIN PITTI: Could you comment on the report from Democrats in Washington questioning the conditions of the USS Lincoln and situations with Marines aboard? PETE HEGSETH: Completely misrepresented. Listen, we make sure at every ship, every crew, every captain has everything we can provide them at every single moment. Some deployments are longer than others and I have more respect and gratitude for those sailors that- then anybody. What they do in those high seas in those austere conditions with less port calls- it's incredible. Americans don't understand what it's like to do that. So as- as someone who's been- not been on a ship like that but been on long deployments, I feel it. I want them home as soon as everybody else, too. I want folks rotated as quickly as possible, I want the best for them. My- my commanders know that, our service secretaries know that, the President expects that and so to that crew and to all those crews: we're going to do everything we can for you and we are so grateful for their dedication- of that crew and others. They’ve held the line for the country and they’ve done a fantastic job.

WATCH: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth addresses recent reporting on the USS Abraham Lincoln EDWIN PITTI: Could you comment on the report from Democrats in Washington questioning the conditions of the USS Lincoln and situations with Marines aboard? PETE HEGSETH: Completely misrepresented. Listen, we make sure at every ship, every crew, every captain has everything we can provide them at every single moment. Some deployments are longer than others and I have more respect and gratitude for those sailors that- then anybody. What they do in those high seas in those austere conditions with less port calls- it's incredible. Americans don't understand what it's like to do that. So as- as someone who's been- not been on a ship like that but been on long deployments, I feel it. I want them home as soon as everybody else, too. I want folks rotated as quickly as possible, I want the best for them. My- my commanders know that, our service secretaries know that, the President expects that and so to that crew and to all those crews: we're going to do everything we can for you and we are so grateful for their dedication- of that crew and others. They’ve held the line for the country and they’ve done a fantastic job.

Jorge Bonilla

34,470 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Kobe Bryant cold-called Jony Ive, Oprah, and Nike's CEO to learn how they think: "I just cold-call people. Absolutely. I just cold-call people and pick their brain about stuff. Some of the questions I'll ask will seem really, really simple and stupid, quite honestly, for them. But if I don't know, I don't know. I have to ask. I want to learn more about how they build their business, how they run their companies, how they see the world." On who he calls: "We could start in the Nike family. I cold-call Mark Parker all the time. Johnny Ive. Dan Wieden. Oprah Winfrey. Arianna Huffington. Hillary Swank. It just goes on and on and on." Kobe explains why he called Jony Ive: "He's obviously unique in what he does. I want to know how does he view product? How does he view the process of designing product? How does he know when he has the product exactly where he wants it to be? How is he seeing the world differently than everybody else who's manufacturing hardware? There's something going on from the moment he sees something to when it goes into his brain, that's a different process than other designers. I'm curious to know what that is." Kobe visited Apple to learn: "I spent the day there, talking with Johnny, picking his brain about product. What makes them who they are? And why? Once you have the passion the thing that you're passionate about, now you can look at other people, other entities, works of art, and draw things from that to help you be better at what you do. By looking for those common denominators." Jony Ive asked Kobe the same questions in return: "Johnny wanted to know, how do I prepare? How do I study? How do I view the game? How do you build your game? My response is much like the way he builds products. You think sequentially. You look at the end result of what you want to create. But in order to create that, there are so many little things that go into this massive entity or device." Kobe continues: "It's no different than building my basketball game. You start with: where do you want your game to be? What would make your game most unstoppable or hard to deal with? Now you work backwards from there. You start building it one piece at a time. One move at a time. One counter at a time. There's a lot of similarities." On building his company, Kobe Inc: "We're just cranking away every day, building out the internal structure. Communicating the culture internally. Where are we going? Building out that model, that plan. We also don't want to get too far ahead of ourselves. I have this vision of where I'd like us to go, but it's important for us to go one step at a time." On what he'd tell other athletes about marketing: "For me, doing that, it seems like I should really just do it for free. Because what I'm going to tell them is: be yourself. That's it. Be you. There's no gimmick. You don't have to contrive anything. Who are you? Where are you today? What is your story? Where does that come from? Then all you're doing is communicating that story to the public." Kobe reflects on LeBron going back to Cleveland: "It depends how you shape the story. You stay in Miami, there's a great story you can mold around that. You go to Cleveland, there's a way you can mold that too. It really just depends on what his personal truth is. I think he communicated his truth extremely well, and that's what you have to stick to."

Kobe Bryant cold-called Jony Ive, Oprah, and Nike's CEO to learn how they think: "I just cold-call people. Absolutely. I just cold-call people and pick their brain about stuff. Some of the questions I'll ask will seem really, really simple and stupid, quite honestly, for them. But if I don't know, I don't know. I have to ask. I want to learn more about how they build their business, how they run their companies, how they see the world." On who he calls: "We could start in the Nike family. I cold-call Mark Parker all the time. Johnny Ive. Dan Wieden. Oprah Winfrey. Arianna Huffington. Hillary Swank. It just goes on and on and on." Kobe explains why he called Jony Ive: "He's obviously unique in what he does. I want to know how does he view product? How does he view the process of designing product? How does he know when he has the product exactly where he wants it to be? How is he seeing the world differently than everybody else who's manufacturing hardware? There's something going on from the moment he sees something to when it goes into his brain, that's a different process than other designers. I'm curious to know what that is." Kobe visited Apple to learn: "I spent the day there, talking with Johnny, picking his brain about product. What makes them who they are? And why? Once you have the passion the thing that you're passionate about, now you can look at other people, other entities, works of art, and draw things from that to help you be better at what you do. By looking for those common denominators." Jony Ive asked Kobe the same questions in return: "Johnny wanted to know, how do I prepare? How do I study? How do I view the game? How do you build your game? My response is much like the way he builds products. You think sequentially. You look at the end result of what you want to create. But in order to create that, there are so many little things that go into this massive entity or device." Kobe continues: "It's no different than building my basketball game. You start with: where do you want your game to be? What would make your game most unstoppable or hard to deal with? Now you work backwards from there. You start building it one piece at a time. One move at a time. One counter at a time. There's a lot of similarities." On building his company, Kobe Inc: "We're just cranking away every day, building out the internal structure. Communicating the culture internally. Where are we going? Building out that model, that plan. We also don't want to get too far ahead of ourselves. I have this vision of where I'd like us to go, but it's important for us to go one step at a time." On what he'd tell other athletes about marketing: "For me, doing that, it seems like I should really just do it for free. Because what I'm going to tell them is: be yourself. That's it. Be you. There's no gimmick. You don't have to contrive anything. Who are you? Where are you today? What is your story? Where does that come from? Then all you're doing is communicating that story to the public." Kobe reflects on LeBron going back to Cleveland: "It depends how you shape the story. You stay in Miami, there's a great story you can mold around that. You go to Cleveland, there's a way you can mold that too. It really just depends on what his personal truth is. I think he communicated his truth extremely well, and that's what you have to stick to."

Jaynit

144,192 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

15 YEARS OF TRADING ADVICE I started trading in 2011, and my first lesson was brutal but simple: trust the process and focus on getting better every day. My start was awful. Real-time trading was fast, chaotic, and unforgiving. I hesitated on entries, chased moves, and held losers far past my stop. I made the same mistakes over and over. Before long, I was at the back of my training class at Trillium Trading. Progress didn’t come from trading more — it came when I stepped back and built a framework for improvement: deliberate practice, structured review, and systemizing my work. I wasn’t making money yet, but my win rate and consistency were improving. That mattered. In 2012, I learned something that changed everything: most profits come from very few opportunities. I coined the “Broken Slot Machine” concept and drastically narrowed my focus to in-play stocks — names with exceptional volume, volatility, or fresh news. Cutting out noise was a turning point. I still trade this way today. 2013 was my breakthrough year. I stopped chasing complexity and built a small playbook of “easy money” trades — simple, repeatable setups with defined risk. A few mean-reversion plays. Small, consistent wins. Fewer unforced errors. That’s when my PNL finally stabilized and my confidence started compounding. In 2014, I nearly blew up my career. A fat-tail after-hours loss wiped out over $100K in minutes. That drawdown forced me to build strict drawdown protocols — daily, weekly, and monthly loss limits with zero exceptions. Those rules didn’t just save my career — they’ve saved countless others since. By 2015, I shifted my mindset away from obsessing over PNL and toward improving expected value every day — what I now call the Bobblehead Concept. Red days became feedback. Growth became the metric. That mindset carried me through the emotional swings of trading. In 2016, I learned how much environment matters. Trading isn’t purely an individual sport. Being surrounded by serious traders — sharing ideas, accountability, and lessons — accelerated growth faster than anything else. In 2017, I adopted the Daily Report Card habit. Daily reflection. One improvement at a time. Treating trading like a professional athlete reviewing game film. This single habit was foundational to everything that followed. In 2018, I stopped trying to be early. I learned to wait for the right side of the V — letting moves exhaust before entering. Risk dropped. Win rate rose. Size increased. Being right mattered more than being first. From 2019 onward, it was about 1% improvements, adaptability, and pressing size only when edge was extreme. 2020 rewarded preparation. After almost 10 years of trading, COVID hit and it was a day trader's dream market. Most traders scale linearly, but the real outlier performance comes from identifying when you have an A+ setup and absolutely maximizing it. Doing so allowed me to have my first year making over $10m in PNL. By 2021, my technical skills were dialed in. What mattered most was psychology and performance optimization. I realized that how I managed my mental game determined how consistently I could execute at the highest level. Once you have edge, your mental state is what determines how consistently you stick to your system and capture the opportunities in front of you. Strong mental game allows you to avoid FOMO, ragetrading, and other bad habits that leech our PNL. 2022 the markets slowed down and punished many that didn't adapt. I realized that survival in trading isn’t about always being aggressive—it’s about trading based on what the market requires of you. The best traders don’t try to force the market to fit them, they fit their trading to the market and evolve faster than everyone else. 2023 I started allocating more energy toward swing trading—holding positions for days rather than seconds or minutes. This, coupled with selling options premium, gave me the space to step back, zoom out, and build a more sustainable lifestyle. I was no longer glued to the screen 10 hours a day. It reminded me that trading is a means to an end. 2024, I pushed myself to go beyond stocks. I dove deeper into options, futures, and overnight trading. Each new product came with its own quirks, nuances, and edge opportunities. Learning these instruments wasn’t just about more tools—it was about building a truly diversified and adaptable trading approach that maximizes your expected value based on the situation. At the elite level, the more markets and products you open yourself up to, the more opportunities you have to profit and the more mediums you have to express your trade in the most effective way possible. Now at the end of 2025, after 15 years, the biggest lesson is this: There’s no finish line in this game. The best traders stay curious. They stay hungry. And no matter how good you get, if you’re going to stay relevant in markets, you need to always be learning. I'm excited to see what 2026 will bring and I wish you all nothing but health, happiness, and the success you all are looking for.

15 YEARS OF TRADING ADVICE I started trading in 2011, and my first lesson was brutal but simple: trust the process and focus on getting better every day. My start was awful. Real-time trading was fast, chaotic, and unforgiving. I hesitated on entries, chased moves, and held losers far past my stop. I made the same mistakes over and over. Before long, I was at the back of my training class at Trillium Trading. Progress didn’t come from trading more — it came when I stepped back and built a framework for improvement: deliberate practice, structured review, and systemizing my work. I wasn’t making money yet, but my win rate and consistency were improving. That mattered. In 2012, I learned something that changed everything: most profits come from very few opportunities. I coined the “Broken Slot Machine” concept and drastically narrowed my focus to in-play stocks — names with exceptional volume, volatility, or fresh news. Cutting out noise was a turning point. I still trade this way today. 2013 was my breakthrough year. I stopped chasing complexity and built a small playbook of “easy money” trades — simple, repeatable setups with defined risk. A few mean-reversion plays. Small, consistent wins. Fewer unforced errors. That’s when my PNL finally stabilized and my confidence started compounding. In 2014, I nearly blew up my career. A fat-tail after-hours loss wiped out over $100K in minutes. That drawdown forced me to build strict drawdown protocols — daily, weekly, and monthly loss limits with zero exceptions. Those rules didn’t just save my career — they’ve saved countless others since. By 2015, I shifted my mindset away from obsessing over PNL and toward improving expected value every day — what I now call the Bobblehead Concept. Red days became feedback. Growth became the metric. That mindset carried me through the emotional swings of trading. In 2016, I learned how much environment matters. Trading isn’t purely an individual sport. Being surrounded by serious traders — sharing ideas, accountability, and lessons — accelerated growth faster than anything else. In 2017, I adopted the Daily Report Card habit. Daily reflection. One improvement at a time. Treating trading like a professional athlete reviewing game film. This single habit was foundational to everything that followed. In 2018, I stopped trying to be early. I learned to wait for the right side of the V — letting moves exhaust before entering. Risk dropped. Win rate rose. Size increased. Being right mattered more than being first. From 2019 onward, it was about 1% improvements, adaptability, and pressing size only when edge was extreme. 2020 rewarded preparation. After almost 10 years of trading, COVID hit and it was a day trader's dream market. Most traders scale linearly, but the real outlier performance comes from identifying when you have an A+ setup and absolutely maximizing it. Doing so allowed me to have my first year making over $10m in PNL. By 2021, my technical skills were dialed in. What mattered most was psychology and performance optimization. I realized that how I managed my mental game determined how consistently I could execute at the highest level. Once you have edge, your mental state is what determines how consistently you stick to your system and capture the opportunities in front of you. Strong mental game allows you to avoid FOMO, ragetrading, and other bad habits that leech our PNL. 2022 the markets slowed down and punished many that didn't adapt. I realized that survival in trading isn’t about always being aggressive—it’s about trading based on what the market requires of you. The best traders don’t try to force the market to fit them, they fit their trading to the market and evolve faster than everyone else. 2023 I started allocating more energy toward swing trading—holding positions for days rather than seconds or minutes. This, coupled with selling options premium, gave me the space to step back, zoom out, and build a more sustainable lifestyle. I was no longer glued to the screen 10 hours a day. It reminded me that trading is a means to an end. 2024, I pushed myself to go beyond stocks. I dove deeper into options, futures, and overnight trading. Each new product came with its own quirks, nuances, and edge opportunities. Learning these instruments wasn’t just about more tools—it was about building a truly diversified and adaptable trading approach that maximizes your expected value based on the situation. At the elite level, the more markets and products you open yourself up to, the more opportunities you have to profit and the more mediums you have to express your trade in the most effective way possible. Now at the end of 2025, after 15 years, the biggest lesson is this: There’s no finish line in this game. The best traders stay curious. They stay hungry. And no matter how good you get, if you’re going to stay relevant in markets, you need to always be learning. I'm excited to see what 2026 will bring and I wish you all nothing but health, happiness, and the success you all are looking for.

Lance Breitstein 🇺🇸🌎

45,319 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

David Lynch: "You're operating with a limited mind and don't realize it" "If you have a golf ball-size consciousness, when you read a book, you'll have a golf ball-size understanding. When you look out, a golf ball-size awareness. When you wake up in the morning, a golf ball-size wakefulness. But if you could expand that consciousness, you read the book with more understanding. You look out with more awareness. You wake up with more wakefulness." Lynch explains what lies beneath: "There's an ocean of pure vibrant consciousness inside each one of us. It's right at the source and base of mind, right at the source of thought. It's also at the source of all matter. Modern physics calls it the unified field. All matter, everything that is a thing emerges from this field." He describes what the field contains: "This field has qualities like bliss, intelligence, creativity, universal love, energy, peace. It's not the intellectual understanding of this field, but the experiencing of it that does everything. You dive within, transcend, experience this field of pure consciousness, and you unfold it. It grows. The final outcome of this growth of consciousness is called enlightenment. And a side effect of enlivening this consciousness is that negativity starts to recede." Lynch shares what happened when he started meditating: "When I started, I was filled with anxieties. Filled with fears. Kind of a depression. And anger. I took this anger out on my first wife. After two weeks of meditation, she comes to me and says, 'What's going on?' I was quiet for a moment because it could have been any number of things she might have been referring to. I said, 'What do you mean?' She said, 'This anger, where did it go?' I didn't even realize it had lifted." He explains why negativity kills creativity: "Anger, depression, sorrow, these are beautiful things in a story. But they're like poison to the filmmaker. Poison to the painter. Poison to creativity. They're like a vice grip. If you're super depressed, you can hardly get out of bed, let alone think of ideas or have creativity flowing." Lynch describes what grows when you expand consciousness: "It's money in the bank to get that beautiful consciousness growing. Creativity flows. The ability to catch ideas at a deeper level. Intuition grows. This field is a field of pure knowing. You dive in there, and you just know how to go. You know how to solve problems. It's like an ocean of solutions." He shares the ultimate benefit: "The ultimate thing for me is the enjoyment of the doing. The enjoyment of life grows huge. I love making films now more than ever before. Ideas flow more. Everybody has more fun on the set. People look like friends, not like enemies. It's a beautiful, beautiful thing." Lynch addresses the myth that you need anger to create: "People say, 'You gotta have anger. You gotta have an edge to create.' No, you gotta have energy. You gotta have clarity to create. You gotta be able to catch ideas. You gotta be strong enough to fight unbelievable pressure and stress. And this gives you more and more ability. It just looks beautiful. It's way, way, way better." On the nature of true happiness: "They say true happiness isn't out there. True happiness lies within. I always wondered, where is this 'within'? And they don't say where it is. They don't even say how to get to it. But it's there. And when you're in it, you know you're in it. It's familiar. It's you. Right away, a happiness, but it's not a goofball happiness. It's a thick beauty. A thick beauty to appreciate life and living. And suffering starts to go."

David Lynch: "You're operating with a limited mind and don't realize it" "If you have a golf ball-size consciousness, when you read a book, you'll have a golf ball-size understanding. When you look out, a golf ball-size awareness. When you wake up in the morning, a golf ball-size wakefulness. But if you could expand that consciousness, you read the book with more understanding. You look out with more awareness. You wake up with more wakefulness." Lynch explains what lies beneath: "There's an ocean of pure vibrant consciousness inside each one of us. It's right at the source and base of mind, right at the source of thought. It's also at the source of all matter. Modern physics calls it the unified field. All matter, everything that is a thing emerges from this field." He describes what the field contains: "This field has qualities like bliss, intelligence, creativity, universal love, energy, peace. It's not the intellectual understanding of this field, but the experiencing of it that does everything. You dive within, transcend, experience this field of pure consciousness, and you unfold it. It grows. The final outcome of this growth of consciousness is called enlightenment. And a side effect of enlivening this consciousness is that negativity starts to recede." Lynch shares what happened when he started meditating: "When I started, I was filled with anxieties. Filled with fears. Kind of a depression. And anger. I took this anger out on my first wife. After two weeks of meditation, she comes to me and says, 'What's going on?' I was quiet for a moment because it could have been any number of things she might have been referring to. I said, 'What do you mean?' She said, 'This anger, where did it go?' I didn't even realize it had lifted." He explains why negativity kills creativity: "Anger, depression, sorrow, these are beautiful things in a story. But they're like poison to the filmmaker. Poison to the painter. Poison to creativity. They're like a vice grip. If you're super depressed, you can hardly get out of bed, let alone think of ideas or have creativity flowing." Lynch describes what grows when you expand consciousness: "It's money in the bank to get that beautiful consciousness growing. Creativity flows. The ability to catch ideas at a deeper level. Intuition grows. This field is a field of pure knowing. You dive in there, and you just know how to go. You know how to solve problems. It's like an ocean of solutions." He shares the ultimate benefit: "The ultimate thing for me is the enjoyment of the doing. The enjoyment of life grows huge. I love making films now more than ever before. Ideas flow more. Everybody has more fun on the set. People look like friends, not like enemies. It's a beautiful, beautiful thing." Lynch addresses the myth that you need anger to create: "People say, 'You gotta have anger. You gotta have an edge to create.' No, you gotta have energy. You gotta have clarity to create. You gotta be able to catch ideas. You gotta be strong enough to fight unbelievable pressure and stress. And this gives you more and more ability. It just looks beautiful. It's way, way, way better." On the nature of true happiness: "They say true happiness isn't out there. True happiness lies within. I always wondered, where is this 'within'? And they don't say where it is. They don't even say how to get to it. But it's there. And when you're in it, you know you're in it. It's familiar. It's you. Right away, a happiness, but it's not a goofball happiness. It's a thick beauty. A thick beauty to appreciate life and living. And suffering starts to go."

Jaynit

269,948 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

EMI X INFINITY CLINIC 2ND #InfinityMedicalClinicxEmi 🎤: I heard that yesterday you had a sports competition, how was it? 🦊: Yesterday, we had the GMMTV Starlympics. It was pretty fun, it didn't end until midnight. 🎤: I liked the moment when you passed the baton, I want to see it again. 🦊: (does the bit of the Chanel dance) 🦊: After I passed the baton, I... (Chanel dance move) 🎤: Say I'm running and I want to pass you the baton. 🦊: I'm the one to receive? I was the one who passed it. You have to be the one to receive it. 🎤: Okay, I'll receive it. 🦊: Before you receive it, you have to aeh aeh (referencing the Chanel dance) once. 🎤: Aeh~! It's like my muscles are weak. 🦊: You have to do it like this (places finger at mouth). You have to bend down, aeh, and then your butt, aeh (demonstrating the dance move). 🎤: How's this? 🦊: That's good. So before you receive the baton, you have to aeh aeh, 1, 2, 3, aeh aeh, and then you receive it, and then I– 🎤: Continue running? 🦊: I aeh aeh after (does the Chanel move). 🎤: Ah, so you aeh again. 🦊: That's right. 🎤: Aside from the aeh, I also saw you supporting each other. 🦊: How so? 🎤: You didn't look at anyone else, you were just looking at each other. 🦊: And who was I supposed to look at? 🎤: What was going on there? 🦊: Who was I supposed to look at? I don't know who I was supposed to look at. 🎤: So– 🦊: Maybe I should look at this reindeer (on the stage), it's so big and blocking everything. 🎤: And what was going on with your hair? Your hair was getting tangled all the time and your nong had to help you look after it? 🦊: She looked at it herself, I didn't ask her to 😆 🎤: It would've been nice if she could have come along too, it would be fun. 🦊: Me too, it would've been good if she'd been here to help me sing.* 🎤: You sang the wrong version, like you're jet lagged. 🦊: Jet lagged 😆 * Emi almost sang the Starlympics version of "More Than Words"

EMI X INFINITY CLINIC 2ND #InfinityMedicalClinicxEmi 🎤: I heard that yesterday you had a sports competition, how was it? 🦊: Yesterday, we had the GMMTV Starlympics. It was pretty fun, it didn't end until midnight. 🎤: I liked the moment when you passed the baton, I want to see it again. 🦊: (does the bit of the Chanel dance) 🦊: After I passed the baton, I... (Chanel dance move) 🎤: Say I'm running and I want to pass you the baton. 🦊: I'm the one to receive? I was the one who passed it. You have to be the one to receive it. 🎤: Okay, I'll receive it. 🦊: Before you receive it, you have to aeh aeh (referencing the Chanel dance) once. 🎤: Aeh~! It's like my muscles are weak. 🦊: You have to do it like this (places finger at mouth). You have to bend down, aeh, and then your butt, aeh (demonstrating the dance move). 🎤: How's this? 🦊: That's good. So before you receive the baton, you have to aeh aeh, 1, 2, 3, aeh aeh, and then you receive it, and then I– 🎤: Continue running? 🦊: I aeh aeh after (does the Chanel move). 🎤: Ah, so you aeh again. 🦊: That's right. 🎤: Aside from the aeh, I also saw you supporting each other. 🦊: How so? 🎤: You didn't look at anyone else, you were just looking at each other. 🦊: And who was I supposed to look at? 🎤: What was going on there? 🦊: Who was I supposed to look at? I don't know who I was supposed to look at. 🎤: So– 🦊: Maybe I should look at this reindeer (on the stage), it's so big and blocking everything. 🎤: And what was going on with your hair? Your hair was getting tangled all the time and your nong had to help you look after it? 🦊: She looked at it herself, I didn't ask her to 😆 🎤: It would've been nice if she could have come along too, it would be fun. 🦊: Me too, it would've been good if she'd been here to help me sing.* 🎤: You sang the wrong version, like you're jet lagged. 🦊: Jet lagged 😆 * Emi almost sang the Starlympics version of "More Than Words"

K-bab

15,517 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

CK exploding Rode mic is going viral again, bc it's wrong. More absurd CK theories go more viral. It would take less than an afternoon to demonstrate the theory, Jon Bray has been promising to do a simulated test of his theory for over 6mo. Where's that at? Shaped charges are not uncommon. The video below is some dude in flip flops making a shaped charge with PETN (angry snow). They don't miniaturize well below a certain threshold. 2.5g is very small and you can see how ineffective it was. The charge is still an explosive and still sends pieces in all directions. A HPE blasting cap alone, even smaller and cleaner, would be more effective. Smoke, energetic flash, burn, shrapnel - you see none of that in CK video. The wound makes no sense either. It wasn't a shaped charged in Charlie Kirk's Rode mic. More slop and nonsense. The black pieces in the backseat could easily be something else or it is from the Rode mic, that most likely simply got stepped on and shattered. If it was from an explosion inside, those pieces would have ripped through his cotton t-shirt. Shaped charges pulverize sand into dust, classic hallmark. I don't know why Candace is having such a hard time imagining someone stepped on the mic or it got caught in the seat rail and chair slid into it. We see no burns, no shrapnel, there's no flash on CK. It's simply not what happened that day and it goes viral bc it's wrong. Shaped charges (27,000 fps) are even more destructive than a 30.06 (2,700 fps). It's essentially a copper cone the inverts and turns into a molten slug that blows through armored plate. The bullet would go through and through, but so would a shaped charge. Candace should've asked Erika for one thing - CK's X-RAY. EK is the only one who has access to it. We still don't know how CK died. We don't know if his neck vertebrae were damaged, don't know what went into his next and from what direction. Until you have that, there's no way to know. Doesn't mean ppl need to invent SLoP to layer over the fed slop.

CK exploding Rode mic is going viral again, bc it's wrong. More absurd CK theories go more viral. It would take less than an afternoon to demonstrate the theory, Jon Bray has been promising to do a simulated test of his theory for over 6mo. Where's that at? Shaped charges are not uncommon. The video below is some dude in flip flops making a shaped charge with PETN (angry snow). They don't miniaturize well below a certain threshold. 2.5g is very small and you can see how ineffective it was. The charge is still an explosive and still sends pieces in all directions. A HPE blasting cap alone, even smaller and cleaner, would be more effective. Smoke, energetic flash, burn, shrapnel - you see none of that in CK video. The wound makes no sense either. It wasn't a shaped charged in Charlie Kirk's Rode mic. More slop and nonsense. The black pieces in the backseat could easily be something else or it is from the Rode mic, that most likely simply got stepped on and shattered. If it was from an explosion inside, those pieces would have ripped through his cotton t-shirt. Shaped charges pulverize sand into dust, classic hallmark. I don't know why Candace is having such a hard time imagining someone stepped on the mic or it got caught in the seat rail and chair slid into it. We see no burns, no shrapnel, there's no flash on CK. It's simply not what happened that day and it goes viral bc it's wrong. Shaped charges (27,000 fps) are even more destructive than a 30.06 (2,700 fps). It's essentially a copper cone the inverts and turns into a molten slug that blows through armored plate. The bullet would go through and through, but so would a shaped charge. Candace should've asked Erika for one thing - CK's X-RAY. EK is the only one who has access to it. We still don't know how CK died. We don't know if his neck vertebrae were damaged, don't know what went into his next and from what direction. Until you have that, there's no way to know. Doesn't mean ppl need to invent SLoP to layer over the fed slop.

ᵀᴿᴵᴸᴸᴵᴼᴺ

15,455 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Why is Palantir so expensive? You don’t need to look at spreadsheets. Just consider this: The market knows NVIDIA sells the shovels for the AI goldrush. The market is realizing that AI isn’t being monetized at the commercial level because although it’s cool, it’s not unlocking any real insights yet. The market now anticipates that Palantir is selling the maps to find the gold…. Gold being AI-driven insights that actually solve difficult problems. Software that works. Since 2021, NVIDIA’s revenue has exploded from $16B to $96B. Palantir’s TTM revenue is $2.5B. The trajectory of Palantir has changed since AIP released in 2023, which is enabling the company to scale. If NVIDIA sells the shovels, and Palantir provides the maps, then the market believes Palantir will see the same explosion of growth within the commercial market, which the market believes has an almost unlimited TAM for Palantir. A lot of people missed out on NVIDIA. While Palantir’s market cap is expensive at $95B, it is nothing compared to NVIDIA’s $3.26T market cap in terms of size. The market doesn’t want to miss out on the next big thing. At this point, investors have thrown all standard methods of valuation out of the window… Those days were years ago. To me, at this point, buying the stock is betting on NVIDIA-like growth (No I’m not saying the company will shoot to a $3T market cap in 2 years — you get the point). If the company does not show this sort of revenue growth, the stock will be punished. This is the risk investors are willing to take. While I am very bullish on the company in the long run, I, like everyone else, have no clue what will actually happen in the short term. This is not a stock to play on the short term. This is why I continue to hold, regardless of how “expensive” the stock gets. I personally believe Palantir does in fact carry the potential to see explosive revenue growth to more than enough justify its current ratios. I’m not saying it will happen this quarter. But the potential is there. It’s a matter of when, in my opinion. I would never risk selling what I view as my golden ticket to wealth with the justification of “it’s too expensive, the price will come back down and I can buy even more then”. If the stock crashes, I can start buying more shares regardless — I don’t want to get greedy and try to time the market. I would never forgive myself if I sold and the stock ended up soaring so high that even after a crash, it would be far too expensive for me to get back in with my original position size (plus capital gains tax). I don’t care who agrees with me or who thinks I’m crazy for saying this — it’s a real risk to me and I’m not willing to take it. This is not me telling you to buy $PLTR. My average is $8.50. Only you can decide what is right, and your decision should be made on your own level of conviction from studying the company — nothing else. This is me telling you why it’s so expensive. Again, I believe that if the stock does not continue to crush earnings each quarter, even the slightest miss, the stock will be punished in the short term. For longs, it’s another opportunity to accumulate more. This is my opinion, of course. 5-10 years from now, we’ll see who was right. Chips & Ontology.

Why is Palantir so expensive? You don’t need to look at spreadsheets. Just consider this: The market knows NVIDIA sells the shovels for the AI goldrush. The market is realizing that AI isn’t being monetized at the commercial level because although it’s cool, it’s not unlocking any real insights yet. The market now anticipates that Palantir is selling the maps to find the gold…. Gold being AI-driven insights that actually solve difficult problems. Software that works. Since 2021, NVIDIA’s revenue has exploded from $16B to $96B. Palantir’s TTM revenue is $2.5B. The trajectory of Palantir has changed since AIP released in 2023, which is enabling the company to scale. If NVIDIA sells the shovels, and Palantir provides the maps, then the market believes Palantir will see the same explosion of growth within the commercial market, which the market believes has an almost unlimited TAM for Palantir. A lot of people missed out on NVIDIA. While Palantir’s market cap is expensive at $95B, it is nothing compared to NVIDIA’s $3.26T market cap in terms of size. The market doesn’t want to miss out on the next big thing. At this point, investors have thrown all standard methods of valuation out of the window… Those days were years ago. To me, at this point, buying the stock is betting on NVIDIA-like growth (No I’m not saying the company will shoot to a $3T market cap in 2 years — you get the point). If the company does not show this sort of revenue growth, the stock will be punished. This is the risk investors are willing to take. While I am very bullish on the company in the long run, I, like everyone else, have no clue what will actually happen in the short term. This is not a stock to play on the short term. This is why I continue to hold, regardless of how “expensive” the stock gets. I personally believe Palantir does in fact carry the potential to see explosive revenue growth to more than enough justify its current ratios. I’m not saying it will happen this quarter. But the potential is there. It’s a matter of when, in my opinion. I would never risk selling what I view as my golden ticket to wealth with the justification of “it’s too expensive, the price will come back down and I can buy even more then”. If the stock crashes, I can start buying more shares regardless — I don’t want to get greedy and try to time the market. I would never forgive myself if I sold and the stock ended up soaring so high that even after a crash, it would be far too expensive for me to get back in with my original position size (plus capital gains tax). I don’t care who agrees with me or who thinks I’m crazy for saying this — it’s a real risk to me and I’m not willing to take it. This is not me telling you to buy $PLTR. My average is $8.50. Only you can decide what is right, and your decision should be made on your own level of conviction from studying the company — nothing else. This is me telling you why it’s so expensive. Again, I believe that if the stock does not continue to crush earnings each quarter, even the slightest miss, the stock will be punished in the short term. For longs, it’s another opportunity to accumulate more. This is my opinion, of course. 5-10 years from now, we’ll see who was right. Chips & Ontology.

Jack Prescott

278,422 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Technical details and the sheer amount of work (and incredible talent) that went into some 80s games completely eluded you as a kid. You simply loved the game and never thought twice about it. Now, being much older, I often find myself looking back at those classics and diving into the technical details: Who created it? How long did it take? Was it a solo project? And most mind-blowing of all: what was the actual size of the game? That last part especially makes my brain melt, and the older I get, the more it sinks in. What those early programmers achieved can only be described as pure genius (and I don’t use that word lightly). Hardware no longer feels like a limiting factor in modern gaming. We have endless megabytes of RAM, terabytes of storage space, and lightning-fast internet. Forty years ago, it was essentially the Stone Age by comparison. An average picture you save on your phone or PC has a size of around 400 kilobytes. It’s just a static image, it doesn’t do anything. Now divide that by ten and you drop to 40 kilobytes. That’s roughly the size of The Last Ninja, developed by System 3 and published almost four decades ago in 1987. It was a single 5.25" floppy disk. I still struggle to comprehend how programmers back then achieved what they did - the incredibly immersive worlds they created under such limitations. I was simply blown away by the graphics (that gorgeous isometric view on the C64, packed with amazing detail) and absolutely mesmerized by the kickass sound. What Ben Daglish and Anthony Lees conjured up musically is an iconic masterpiece that will forever be part of gaming history. And that’s not all! The game also gave you some degree of freedom. It wasn’t strictly linear. You could go back and forth, revisit locations if you missed an item, choose to fight or sneak past enemies, hunt for the right objects and levers to progress, and so on. All of that (and more) in just 40 kilobytes - less than 10% the size of a single static photo on your computer that has zero functionality. Oh, and the cherry on the cake? Often those games were created by people without formal education in the field, they were mostly self-taught. They also didn't have any software tools and libraries like today, they wrote pretty much everything from scratch, going beyond what was thought to be technically possible. As a kid you have no clue. As an adult I still don't have a clue how they did it. But I have a lot more appreciation and admiration for their work. And I am glad I experienced it then and can enjoy it even now.

Technical details and the sheer amount of work (and incredible talent) that went into some 80s games completely eluded you as a kid. You simply loved the game and never thought twice about it. Now, being much older, I often find myself looking back at those classics and diving into the technical details: Who created it? How long did it take? Was it a solo project? And most mind-blowing of all: what was the actual size of the game? That last part especially makes my brain melt, and the older I get, the more it sinks in. What those early programmers achieved can only be described as pure genius (and I don’t use that word lightly). Hardware no longer feels like a limiting factor in modern gaming. We have endless megabytes of RAM, terabytes of storage space, and lightning-fast internet. Forty years ago, it was essentially the Stone Age by comparison. An average picture you save on your phone or PC has a size of around 400 kilobytes. It’s just a static image, it doesn’t do anything. Now divide that by ten and you drop to 40 kilobytes. That’s roughly the size of The Last Ninja, developed by System 3 and published almost four decades ago in 1987. It was a single 5.25" floppy disk. I still struggle to comprehend how programmers back then achieved what they did - the incredibly immersive worlds they created under such limitations. I was simply blown away by the graphics (that gorgeous isometric view on the C64, packed with amazing detail) and absolutely mesmerized by the kickass sound. What Ben Daglish and Anthony Lees conjured up musically is an iconic masterpiece that will forever be part of gaming history. And that’s not all! The game also gave you some degree of freedom. It wasn’t strictly linear. You could go back and forth, revisit locations if you missed an item, choose to fight or sneak past enemies, hunt for the right objects and levers to progress, and so on. All of that (and more) in just 40 kilobytes - less than 10% the size of a single static photo on your computer that has zero functionality. Oh, and the cherry on the cake? Often those games were created by people without formal education in the field, they were mostly self-taught. They also didn't have any software tools and libraries like today, they wrote pretty much everything from scratch, going beyond what was thought to be technically possible. As a kid you have no clue. As an adult I still don't have a clue how they did it. But I have a lot more appreciation and admiration for their work. And I am glad I experienced it then and can enjoy it even now.

exQUIZitely 🕹️

18,016 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

$MoistCr1TiKaL dropped a follow up response to his Ethan iDubbbz lawsuit video where he addressed those such as MikeFromPA calling into question his explanation as to why he waited so long to cover Klein In the video he denies avoiding the topic, reaffirms his disavowal of the lawsuits, and touches on Denims's tentative victory "Had a feeling it was going to a pretty poisonous topic..I treat this channel like a diary, I just blabber about things that I feel like talking on..I did as much as research on it as I could..watched iDubbbz stream, watched h3h3 stream..and I talked to both parties..then I just gave u my view" "Ur always welcome to disagree with me..I value differences of opinion..I made the mistake..of taking a peak of what the discussion was..on Reddit and Twitter..there was some very valid critiques and some information..but boy howdy there was a lot of hoopla that I couldn't have even imagined would have been a controversial thing" "There were ppl that were proudly stating they didn't watch the video and then getting angry at things they assumed I might have said..it just feels f'in useless to engage in the topic in that case" "Just me mentioning that I'm not online as much as I used to be was a highly debated topic..when I was talking about the defamation lawsuits..I also mentioned that Ethan has other active lawsuits against other creators and I called him the Nintendo of YouTubers..didn't dive in bc I didn't know much about them..everyone assumes I'm terminally online like I used to be 2-3 years ago" "U can look at my Twitter page and see that I have 2 tweets in like the last 2 years..or on IG I make a post every month and a half and a lot them are just me hanging out with my farm animals..u can check my streaming history..not streaming with the same frequency..I just don't see everything that happens online..can't believe..that's so unbelievable" "Throughout my entire time on YT..I think I have made it beyond crystal clear how much I dislike this litigious approach to online discourse..this excessive use of the legal system for strong arming or silencing" "After learning more about those other lawsuits..guess what, I don't agree with those either..obviously I don't know the nitty gritty around all the lawsuits..from everything I've seen, there's nothing in there that makes me think this is the right way of doing things..or this is different than other times in the past where creators have sued each other over disputes..maybe he has some strong cases..one of the streamers it did seem like they were uninterrupted playing the video without even an attempt to transform it" "I really think if the targets were different..the response would be very different..rn a lot of ppl celebrate them bc they just hate the ppl that Ethan is suing so they go yee haw for it but these individuals..they are a fraction of the size of Ethan so to me, it's a hard case that he was genuinely losing eyeballs bc of them streaming it on their twitch..ya big a hole thing to do but it's not hurting u, it's just u don't like them and they don't like u" "U already won against that kind of behavior..the internet from what I can tell..no one was really on the side of the streamers that were just blatantly streaming it without any kind of transformation..u already won, what's the point in continuing this further just so u can also financially hurt them” "Big one I spent the most time looking into is the Denims case..I don't know what a tentative loss really means bc it's not an official loss..still an ongoing lawsuit but the judge had like a very seemingly stern view on it that even cited Ethan Klein's previous fair use victory against him"$

MoistCr1TiKaL dropped a follow up response to his Ethan iDubbbz lawsuit video where he addressed those such as MikeFromPA calling into question his explanation as to why he waited so long to cover Klein In the video he denies avoiding the topic, reaffirms his disavowal of the lawsuits, and touches on Denims's tentative victory "Had a feeling it was going to a pretty poisonous topic..I treat this channel like a diary, I just blabber about things that I feel like talking on..I did as much as research on it as I could..watched iDubbbz stream, watched h3h3 stream..and I talked to both parties..then I just gave u my view" "Ur always welcome to disagree with me..I value differences of opinion..I made the mistake..of taking a peak of what the discussion was..on Reddit and Twitter..there was some very valid critiques and some information..but boy howdy there was a lot of hoopla that I couldn't have even imagined would have been a controversial thing" "There were ppl that were proudly stating they didn't watch the video and then getting angry at things they assumed I might have said..it just feels f'in useless to engage in the topic in that case" "Just me mentioning that I'm not online as much as I used to be was a highly debated topic..when I was talking about the defamation lawsuits..I also mentioned that Ethan has other active lawsuits against other creators and I called him the Nintendo of YouTubers..didn't dive in bc I didn't know much about them..everyone assumes I'm terminally online like I used to be 2-3 years ago" "U can look at my Twitter page and see that I have 2 tweets in like the last 2 years..or on IG I make a post every month and a half and a lot them are just me hanging out with my farm animals..u can check my streaming history..not streaming with the same frequency..I just don't see everything that happens online..can't believe..that's so unbelievable" "Throughout my entire time on YT..I think I have made it beyond crystal clear how much I dislike this litigious approach to online discourse..this excessive use of the legal system for strong arming or silencing" "After learning more about those other lawsuits..guess what, I don't agree with those either..obviously I don't know the nitty gritty around all the lawsuits..from everything I've seen, there's nothing in there that makes me think this is the right way of doing things..or this is different than other times in the past where creators have sued each other over disputes..maybe he has some strong cases..one of the streamers it did seem like they were uninterrupted playing the video without even an attempt to transform it" "I really think if the targets were different..the response would be very different..rn a lot of ppl celebrate them bc they just hate the ppl that Ethan is suing so they go yee haw for it but these individuals..they are a fraction of the size of Ethan so to me, it's a hard case that he was genuinely losing eyeballs bc of them streaming it on their twitch..ya big a hole thing to do but it's not hurting u, it's just u don't like them and they don't like u" "U already won against that kind of behavior..the internet from what I can tell..no one was really on the side of the streamers that were just blatantly streaming it without any kind of transformation..u already won, what's the point in continuing this further just so u can also financially hurt them” "Big one I spent the most time looking into is the Denims case..I don't know what a tentative loss really means bc it's not an official loss..still an ongoing lawsuit but the judge had like a very seemingly stern view on it that even cited Ethan Klein's previous fair use victory against him"

yeet

112,921 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

💊 Sometimes, The Truth is a Hard Pill to Swallow 💊 "There's no indication that (firsthand whistleblowers who claim they worked hands-on an NHI craft) are, at this moment, willing to come forward. If people were willing at one point, I don't think it's possible anymore for them." ~Corbell (This is not the sensational and misleading "stuff" that tends to go semi-viral in this community. But it's reality. It sucks, but I'd rather hear the truth than have smoke blown up our asses. That's why I asked. Will this post spread like wildfire? Probably not.) "What would be the motivation for someone like that to break from the fold and destroy their whole lives, just because they were called in to come talk with me? It's not gonna happen." ~Corbell (the "me" in that quote is not Corbell and is clarified in the full version below.) ~~~ Joe Murgia: "Have you, or do you know of anybody else, who has claimed to have, spoken to the witness I described earlier: Somebody who claims to have worked in a program for a decent amount of time, and who had hands-on a craft, and said, 'Yeah, I worked on it, and my conclusion was, after three years,' or whatever, 'this was a non-human craft'"? Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Yes! I know people in an official capacity who have interviewed with people that exactly fit this description, and I have pushed on them, being like, 'What is it going to take for someone like that to come forward, publicly?' And by the way, that was part of an ICIG investigation where people of that level were communicated with, and I know exactly who is doing that back and forth." (I'd love to know more about that ICIG investigation. Is it related to what Grusch claimed?) Corbell: "And here's the deal, man. They said to me, 'What would be the motivation for someone like that to break from the fold and destroy their whole lives, just because they were called in to come talk with me? It's not gonna happen. It just not gonna happen.' (If those folks are sharing that information with Corbell, it appears that it's not classified. So those investigators should be able to tell us what they told Corbell. Will they? Probably not. On the flip side, those people who spoke to Corbell could get around the classified aspect by offering up a hypothetical: "Jeremy, if witnesses like that exist, and have spoken to me, why would they destroy their whole lives and go public? Just because they were told they needed to speak with me? Again, hypothetically speaking.") Corbell: "There has to be somebody who's so upset with something surrounding this, that they're just like, gonna try to burn it all down. And usually those people never make it to the starting point, you know? If they're coming from that attitude. People that work in those programs are so highly monitored with polygraphs, and, you know, their family lives, making sure they're stable. "If you remember, all the way back, looking to Lazar, why did he get not called back for The Program? It was because they found out his wife was cheating on him and he became a security risk. That's how security clearances work, is you have to have a stable family life. So people that would break from the fold, that are feeling all that type of pressure and just try to burn the whole house down? Dude, they're going to find out they're in that mental state way prior to them ever being able to get to the starting point. "So it's a long way to say, yeah, man, the Holy Grail? Yeah, I know about those conversations. I've talked to people on both sides of those conversations." (Both sides to me means that Corbell is saying he DID talk to the people who interviewed the whistleblowers and the actual whistleblowers themselves. That's not the biggest takeaway from what he said, but it would be nice to know if he or George Knapp have spoken directly to those firsthand folks and aren't just hearing it second hand.) Corbell: "The thing is, there's no indication that people like that are at this moment willing to come forward. And in fact - I can't go further than that - but in fact, if people were willing at one point, I don't think it's possible anymore for them." (What's changed to where Corbell doesn't think it's possible any more? That's extremely important to know.) Murgia: "And just to be clear, you're talking about other people have had the conversations with those whistleblowers?" Corbell: "Yes." Murgia: "Not you?" Corbell: "Well, what I'm admitting to is that, in official capacity, there are people doing this investigation that have conveyed to me their direct, official debriefing with individuals in those programs. Like, working on the technology, currently. Non-human technology. So I know these people have had those investigatory roles and had those briefings and took the information because of the ICIG, you know, reports." (That makes it seem like it was more than just a hypothetical, which I mentioned earlier.) Murgia: "Cool." Corbell: "Yeah, I wish I could help more on that, guys, you know?" (If you've been waiting for those types of hands-on, firsthand folks to come forward, you need to adjust your expectations after seeing what Corbell said. I have. Some will decide they're tired of waiting and leave this field. Others, who are interested in the phenomenon and not just relying on what happens with witnesses, will always be here. And we still have a hearing coming in September where we will, hopefully, learn new and interesting information from firsthand witnesses who we have never heard from before.)

💊 Sometimes, The Truth is a Hard Pill to Swallow 💊 "There's no indication that (firsthand whistleblowers who claim they worked hands-on an NHI craft) are, at this moment, willing to come forward. If people were willing at one point, I don't think it's possible anymore for them." ~Corbell (This is not the sensational and misleading "stuff" that tends to go semi-viral in this community. But it's reality. It sucks, but I'd rather hear the truth than have smoke blown up our asses. That's why I asked. Will this post spread like wildfire? Probably not.) "What would be the motivation for someone like that to break from the fold and destroy their whole lives, just because they were called in to come talk with me? It's not gonna happen." ~Corbell (the "me" in that quote is not Corbell and is clarified in the full version below.) ~~~ Joe Murgia: "Have you, or do you know of anybody else, who has claimed to have, spoken to the witness I described earlier: Somebody who claims to have worked in a program for a decent amount of time, and who had hands-on a craft, and said, 'Yeah, I worked on it, and my conclusion was, after three years,' or whatever, 'this was a non-human craft'"? Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Yes! I know people in an official capacity who have interviewed with people that exactly fit this description, and I have pushed on them, being like, 'What is it going to take for someone like that to come forward, publicly?' And by the way, that was part of an ICIG investigation where people of that level were communicated with, and I know exactly who is doing that back and forth." (I'd love to know more about that ICIG investigation. Is it related to what Grusch claimed?) Corbell: "And here's the deal, man. They said to me, 'What would be the motivation for someone like that to break from the fold and destroy their whole lives, just because they were called in to come talk with me? It's not gonna happen. It just not gonna happen.' (If those folks are sharing that information with Corbell, it appears that it's not classified. So those investigators should be able to tell us what they told Corbell. Will they? Probably not. On the flip side, those people who spoke to Corbell could get around the classified aspect by offering up a hypothetical: "Jeremy, if witnesses like that exist, and have spoken to me, why would they destroy their whole lives and go public? Just because they were told they needed to speak with me? Again, hypothetically speaking.") Corbell: "There has to be somebody who's so upset with something surrounding this, that they're just like, gonna try to burn it all down. And usually those people never make it to the starting point, you know? If they're coming from that attitude. People that work in those programs are so highly monitored with polygraphs, and, you know, their family lives, making sure they're stable. "If you remember, all the way back, looking to Lazar, why did he get not called back for The Program? It was because they found out his wife was cheating on him and he became a security risk. That's how security clearances work, is you have to have a stable family life. So people that would break from the fold, that are feeling all that type of pressure and just try to burn the whole house down? Dude, they're going to find out they're in that mental state way prior to them ever being able to get to the starting point. "So it's a long way to say, yeah, man, the Holy Grail? Yeah, I know about those conversations. I've talked to people on both sides of those conversations." (Both sides to me means that Corbell is saying he DID talk to the people who interviewed the whistleblowers and the actual whistleblowers themselves. That's not the biggest takeaway from what he said, but it would be nice to know if he or George Knapp have spoken directly to those firsthand folks and aren't just hearing it second hand.) Corbell: "The thing is, there's no indication that people like that are at this moment willing to come forward. And in fact - I can't go further than that - but in fact, if people were willing at one point, I don't think it's possible anymore for them." (What's changed to where Corbell doesn't think it's possible any more? That's extremely important to know.) Murgia: "And just to be clear, you're talking about other people have had the conversations with those whistleblowers?" Corbell: "Yes." Murgia: "Not you?" Corbell: "Well, what I'm admitting to is that, in official capacity, there are people doing this investigation that have conveyed to me their direct, official debriefing with individuals in those programs. Like, working on the technology, currently. Non-human technology. So I know these people have had those investigatory roles and had those briefings and took the information because of the ICIG, you know, reports." (That makes it seem like it was more than just a hypothetical, which I mentioned earlier.) Murgia: "Cool." Corbell: "Yeah, I wish I could help more on that, guys, you know?" (If you've been waiting for those types of hands-on, firsthand folks to come forward, you need to adjust your expectations after seeing what Corbell said. I have. Some will decide they're tired of waiting and leave this field. Others, who are interested in the phenomenon and not just relying on what happens with witnesses, will always be here. And we still have a hearing coming in September where we will, hopefully, learn new and interesting information from firsthand witnesses who we have never heard from before.)

Joe Murgia

53,949 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"I will testify under oath before Congress that what I'm saying is the truth." "And he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' He pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers." ~KW (The photographic evidence I've seen thus far leaves a lot to be desired, so if more images are going to be released (as Lue Elizondo spoke about), let's hope they're clear, and conclusively show artificial structures. Ever since I first heard Wolfe tell his story (2001 at Greer's event), I felt he came across as highly credible. Unfortunately, he was killed in 2018 when he was hit by a tractor trailer as he was biking. So what did he see? Structures built by a non-human intelligence? Or, built by a previous, highly-advanced civilization on Earth? Or, from a current, human, "breakaway civilization"?) ~ Former U.S. Air Force Sergeant Karl Wolfe: "My boss came to me, I was working in a color lab at that time, I was a technician, photographic technician. I was asked to go over to this facility on Langley Air Force Base, where the NSA was bringing in the information from the lunar orbiter. And so I packed up some tools, I went over, I went into the facility. "A couple of officers took me into this hangar. This was a very large hangar. So they took me into this laboratory. I took a look at the equipment. There was an airman second class in there, I was an airman second class as well. He turned the equipment on and put it through its paces. It didn't do what it was supposed to do. I saw what was going on with it, and I said to him, 'You know, we'll have to take this thing out of the lab if we're going to work on it. We can't work on it in here in the dark-room environment.' "So, everyone left the facility, left the dark room, except this airman second class and myself. And were in, waiting for someone to come to remove this piece of equipment. And at the time, I didn't know what the real purpose of this dark room and this operation and this (laughs) facility was. I thought this was where they were bringing the data in and then releasing the images to the public. "They were doing 35 millimeter strips of film at that time, which were then assembled into 18 and a half by 11 inch mosaics, they were called. There is a digital signature and a gray scale on every 35 millimeter strip. And those strips were from successive passes around the moon. "So he was showing me how all this worked, and we walked over to one side of the lab, and he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' And I said, 'Whose (laughs)? What do you mean, whose?' He said, 'Yes, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' "And at that point, I become frightened, and was a little terrified. Thinking to myself that, if anybody walks in the room now, I know we're in jeopardy, we're in trouble, because he shouldn't be giving me this information. "And that he pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers, and things that looked somewhat like radar dishes but they were large structures. If I compare it to what I'm seeing now, because I do have photographs that have our artifacts in them that are similar to what I saw, they're massive. Some of the structures are, you know, half a mile in size. So they're huge structures. "Some of the buildings seemed to have very reflective surfaces on them. A couple of structures that I saw reminded me of cooling towers at power-generating plants, they had that sort of a shape. Some of them were just very, very straight and tall with a flat top. Some of them were round, some of them looked like a Quonset hut, you know, with a domed kind of, like a greenhouse. "The particular shot that I saw, there were several clustered together over a landscape, a fairly large landscape. I didn't want to look at it any longer than that because I felt that my life was in jeopardy. Do you understand what I'm saying (laughs)? I would love to have looked at it longer (laughs), I would have loved to have had copies. I would love to have, you know, said more about it or discussed it more, but I knew I couldn't. And I knew that that young fellow who was sharing this was really, really overstepping his bounds at that point."

"I will testify under oath before Congress that what I'm saying is the truth." "And he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' He pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers." ~KW (The photographic evidence I've seen thus far leaves a lot to be desired, so if more images are going to be released (as Lue Elizondo spoke about), let's hope they're clear, and conclusively show artificial structures. Ever since I first heard Wolfe tell his story (2001 at Greer's event), I felt he came across as highly credible. Unfortunately, he was killed in 2018 when he was hit by a tractor trailer as he was biking. So what did he see? Structures built by a non-human intelligence? Or, built by a previous, highly-advanced civilization on Earth? Or, from a current, human, "breakaway civilization"?) ~ Former U.S. Air Force Sergeant Karl Wolfe: "My boss came to me, I was working in a color lab at that time, I was a technician, photographic technician. I was asked to go over to this facility on Langley Air Force Base, where the NSA was bringing in the information from the lunar orbiter. And so I packed up some tools, I went over, I went into the facility. "A couple of officers took me into this hangar. This was a very large hangar. So they took me into this laboratory. I took a look at the equipment. There was an airman second class in there, I was an airman second class as well. He turned the equipment on and put it through its paces. It didn't do what it was supposed to do. I saw what was going on with it, and I said to him, 'You know, we'll have to take this thing out of the lab if we're going to work on it. We can't work on it in here in the dark-room environment.' "So, everyone left the facility, left the dark room, except this airman second class and myself. And were in, waiting for someone to come to remove this piece of equipment. And at the time, I didn't know what the real purpose of this dark room and this operation and this (laughs) facility was. I thought this was where they were bringing the data in and then releasing the images to the public. "They were doing 35 millimeter strips of film at that time, which were then assembled into 18 and a half by 11 inch mosaics, they were called. There is a digital signature and a gray scale on every 35 millimeter strip. And those strips were from successive passes around the moon. "So he was showing me how all this worked, and we walked over to one side of the lab, and he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' And I said, 'Whose (laughs)? What do you mean, whose?' He said, 'Yes, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' "And at that point, I become frightened, and was a little terrified. Thinking to myself that, if anybody walks in the room now, I know we're in jeopardy, we're in trouble, because he shouldn't be giving me this information. "And that he pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers, and things that looked somewhat like radar dishes but they were large structures. If I compare it to what I'm seeing now, because I do have photographs that have our artifacts in them that are similar to what I saw, they're massive. Some of the structures are, you know, half a mile in size. So they're huge structures. "Some of the buildings seemed to have very reflective surfaces on them. A couple of structures that I saw reminded me of cooling towers at power-generating plants, they had that sort of a shape. Some of them were just very, very straight and tall with a flat top. Some of them were round, some of them looked like a Quonset hut, you know, with a domed kind of, like a greenhouse. "The particular shot that I saw, there were several clustered together over a landscape, a fairly large landscape. I didn't want to look at it any longer than that because I felt that my life was in jeopardy. Do you understand what I'm saying (laughs)? I would love to have looked at it longer (laughs), I would have loved to have had copies. I would love to have, you know, said more about it or discussed it more, but I knew I couldn't. And I knew that that young fellow who was sharing this was really, really overstepping his bounds at that point."

Joe Murgia

118,679 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

After being called a conspiracy theorist nonstop for 3 years, and being right about everything with covid…I figured who am I to crap on someone else’s conspiracy theory without checking into it first? So I looked into all of them as a skeptic and to be fair some were garbage, but probably the most shocking conclusion I did come to…is I don’t think we went to the moon. No way. Facebook has been posting nonstop articles trying to prove we did, which I find suspect as I do with everything they push. I thought it was just me, but tons of the comments were from others like me with more questions then answers. So I did a poll on Twitter and as you can see…less than half the people believe we went there for sure, and the rest are either questioning it or saying no: • How did we “lose” the 1960’s technology to get there? Have you seen how crappy these “spaceships” were? We can’t recreate that aluminum foil curtain rod pile of junk, like really? • How the hell did they “accidentally” delete all the original moon landing footage? So now we can’t examine the originals for manipulation? • Who’s manning the camera on the moon that pans without a time delay and follows the crappy looking lunar module as it weirdly and slowly takes off from the moon? The people 300,000 miles away on earth? Really? I can’t even get my cell phone to work in a valley. Nice to know Nixon can just pick up the phone and get through to the moon though… • Why were the astronauts so excited to leave…then depressed AF when they came back? Did they not know they weren’t really going until the last minute? • Why aren’t there any real pictures of earth from space? Why are the same CG cloud patterns used multiple times over and over? Why are the sizes of the continents changing drastically year from year according to official NASA photos? Why does the distance and size of earth from the moon keep changing so drastically? Am I not supposed to believe my eyes? • What about all the live green screen glitches throughout the years? Remember when they took a picture of Bush Sr getting wheeled through…and you can see the guy on green screen who was supposed to be live at the ISS at that same time? • The most common thing I hear from people that it must have happened because Russia, China, and other space agencies would have called us out for it…have you seen their footage? It’s even crappier and less believable than ours. I literally laughed out loud at China’s moon landing. • Have you seen what stars really look like through a modern zoom Nikon lens? They look NOTHING like NASA says they do, and I doubt there as far away as they’re saying either. They legit look like geometric sound energy spheres, each one has its own special resonance, colors, and frequency. I’ll try to post a video below, it blew my mind and I still don’t know what to make of it. • Why all the fake fact checkers coming out in force recently? Why is everyone deemed a “flat earther” if they question what NASA’s doing with our $55 million dollars a day in taxes? You saw what they just did with the Plandemic…you think faking some space pictures to steal tax money is beyond the realm of possibility for these people? I don’t know what they’re covering up, and I’m not going to pretend I do. I imagine pushing “science” like it’s a religion and that we’re all here because of some super lucky, cosmic accident would help the government control people and remove them from God in general. But honestly…the money laundering portion is enough reason alone for these people. That much we do know…. Who knows what they’re up to…all I know, is that I know when I’m being lied to.

After being called a conspiracy theorist nonstop for 3 years, and being right about everything with covid…I figured who am I to crap on someone else’s conspiracy theory without checking into it first? So I looked into all of them as a skeptic and to be fair some were garbage, but probably the most shocking conclusion I did come to…is I don’t think we went to the moon. No way. Facebook has been posting nonstop articles trying to prove we did, which I find suspect as I do with everything they push. I thought it was just me, but tons of the comments were from others like me with more questions then answers. So I did a poll on Twitter and as you can see…less than half the people believe we went there for sure, and the rest are either questioning it or saying no: • How did we “lose” the 1960’s technology to get there? Have you seen how crappy these “spaceships” were? We can’t recreate that aluminum foil curtain rod pile of junk, like really? • How the hell did they “accidentally” delete all the original moon landing footage? So now we can’t examine the originals for manipulation? • Who’s manning the camera on the moon that pans without a time delay and follows the crappy looking lunar module as it weirdly and slowly takes off from the moon? The people 300,000 miles away on earth? Really? I can’t even get my cell phone to work in a valley. Nice to know Nixon can just pick up the phone and get through to the moon though… • Why were the astronauts so excited to leave…then depressed AF when they came back? Did they not know they weren’t really going until the last minute? • Why aren’t there any real pictures of earth from space? Why are the same CG cloud patterns used multiple times over and over? Why are the sizes of the continents changing drastically year from year according to official NASA photos? Why does the distance and size of earth from the moon keep changing so drastically? Am I not supposed to believe my eyes? • What about all the live green screen glitches throughout the years? Remember when they took a picture of Bush Sr getting wheeled through…and you can see the guy on green screen who was supposed to be live at the ISS at that same time? • The most common thing I hear from people that it must have happened because Russia, China, and other space agencies would have called us out for it…have you seen their footage? It’s even crappier and less believable than ours. I literally laughed out loud at China’s moon landing. • Have you seen what stars really look like through a modern zoom Nikon lens? They look NOTHING like NASA says they do, and I doubt there as far away as they’re saying either. They legit look like geometric sound energy spheres, each one has its own special resonance, colors, and frequency. I’ll try to post a video below, it blew my mind and I still don’t know what to make of it. • Why all the fake fact checkers coming out in force recently? Why is everyone deemed a “flat earther” if they question what NASA’s doing with our $55 million dollars a day in taxes? You saw what they just did with the Plandemic…you think faking some space pictures to steal tax money is beyond the realm of possibility for these people? I don’t know what they’re covering up, and I’m not going to pretend I do. I imagine pushing “science” like it’s a religion and that we’re all here because of some super lucky, cosmic accident would help the government control people and remove them from God in general. But honestly…the money laundering portion is enough reason alone for these people. That much we do know…. Who knows what they’re up to…all I know, is that I know when I’m being lied to.

Mindy MF Robinson 🦄

1,748,360 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Stop perma full clearing if you want to win games Video below explaining it but i am providing a transcript for anyone that doesnt speak english to translate or maybe that are deaf You are losing games by full clearing now. What I mean by this isn't that full clearing is inherently bad. What I mean is that lot of people get stuck thinking they just have to full clear the problem is once you get your first item, a lot of the time it's actually best to just not full clear. Because when you get your first item and especially when you're ahead, you should be looking to do things actively on the map. Because if you just full clear, you're giving the enemy essentially, breathing space. And if they're behind, they shouldn't have breathing space. If you're just full clearing and they're full clearing, you're giving They equal gold, which you never want to do when you're ahead, because any they get is going to be worth more than any gold you get, because of percentages. so whenever you're strong like this, you want to look for ways you can impact the map instead of full clearing. Especially since, in this scenario here, I can see my entire top side is warded. So even if I do get invaded and lose my camps, I at least know it's getting invaded. and I can account for that and do something else here. So, my bot lane just came out of base, fresh items, so they're also strong. So they're also looking to fight. Here I need to wait for them to push one more way before dragon. So I'm just going to take my red buff, and then we're going to look to do the dragon. And the reason this is so important is because we're both spiking. We just came from base. And the enemy has a very strong dragon fight. They have Lissandra, Rengar, and Ash Seraphine, which means Ash Seraphine should almost always have prio. So, if we don't take Dragon with this one timer, Ash Seraphine will always have prio, and then they have a strong 2v2 with the Slander Vengar. So, we have this one time to take it. If I was just to go full clear, my bot would never have prio ever again. This is our one window, and we're able to take the Dragon where my bot lane has prio. So instead of full clearing, I just go straight to the Dragon. And if there is a fight, I'm strong here because I'm on Item Spike, and so is my bot lane. So it's actually a decent fight. And then I can fast forward. So then Rengar ends up ganking my bot lane. I kill him. And then I'm recalling again because I have a decent buy here of 1500 gold. And it's going to be the same thing essentially here. I'm not just going to full clear. There's no reason to just full clear, right? I'm very strong. I have full item. I just bought 1500 gold worth of items. And top's kind of overextending here. So I'm just going to sprint straight top. And we don't end up killing, but we do get his ult and his flash. That's pretty worth. Could have honestly killed him if I Thresh missed his hook. It's a bit unlucky. But the point is. The point is to just not folklore. and I still get my camps guaranteed, and the most Rengar could take is just my raptors. I know he can't take my top side because I'm top side right. So the most I can lose is my raptors. And it's always worth it to just go for the kill top. If I lose my raptors now, it's earlier in the game, and it's a lot harder to break your full clear because you do get punished more. Because one, it's harder to kill people because have less items, less damage, less cooldown stuff like that. It's harder to farm it takes longer. So more camps, you're more your camps are sitting the longer it's going to take for you to clear them. And then, if you do lose camps early game, it snowballs way harder. So I'd say once you get your upgraded Smite, like your Rainbow Smite, like your first upgraded Smite, that's when it's a little bit easier to skip camps. You basically don't really want to break your full clear aside from that. But once you get your first item, for sure, you want to be skipping camps to look for proactive plays. You don't have to go for plays just to go for plays, but you should be looking for that. So I hope that was pretty helpful. Any questions, you can just always DM me or comment below and I'll try to get back to you.

Stop perma full clearing if you want to win games Video below explaining it but i am providing a transcript for anyone that doesnt speak english to translate or maybe that are deaf You are losing games by full clearing now. What I mean by this isn't that full clearing is inherently bad. What I mean is that lot of people get stuck thinking they just have to full clear the problem is once you get your first item, a lot of the time it's actually best to just not full clear. Because when you get your first item and especially when you're ahead, you should be looking to do things actively on the map. Because if you just full clear, you're giving the enemy essentially, breathing space. And if they're behind, they shouldn't have breathing space. If you're just full clearing and they're full clearing, you're giving They equal gold, which you never want to do when you're ahead, because any they get is going to be worth more than any gold you get, because of percentages. so whenever you're strong like this, you want to look for ways you can impact the map instead of full clearing. Especially since, in this scenario here, I can see my entire top side is warded. So even if I do get invaded and lose my camps, I at least know it's getting invaded. and I can account for that and do something else here. So, my bot lane just came out of base, fresh items, so they're also strong. So they're also looking to fight. Here I need to wait for them to push one more way before dragon. So I'm just going to take my red buff, and then we're going to look to do the dragon. And the reason this is so important is because we're both spiking. We just came from base. And the enemy has a very strong dragon fight. They have Lissandra, Rengar, and Ash Seraphine, which means Ash Seraphine should almost always have prio. So, if we don't take Dragon with this one timer, Ash Seraphine will always have prio, and then they have a strong 2v2 with the Slander Vengar. So, we have this one time to take it. If I was just to go full clear, my bot would never have prio ever again. This is our one window, and we're able to take the Dragon where my bot lane has prio. So instead of full clearing, I just go straight to the Dragon. And if there is a fight, I'm strong here because I'm on Item Spike, and so is my bot lane. So it's actually a decent fight. And then I can fast forward. So then Rengar ends up ganking my bot lane. I kill him. And then I'm recalling again because I have a decent buy here of 1500 gold. And it's going to be the same thing essentially here. I'm not just going to full clear. There's no reason to just full clear, right? I'm very strong. I have full item. I just bought 1500 gold worth of items. And top's kind of overextending here. So I'm just going to sprint straight top. And we don't end up killing, but we do get his ult and his flash. That's pretty worth. Could have honestly killed him if I Thresh missed his hook. It's a bit unlucky. But the point is. The point is to just not folklore. and I still get my camps guaranteed, and the most Rengar could take is just my raptors. I know he can't take my top side because I'm top side right. So the most I can lose is my raptors. And it's always worth it to just go for the kill top. If I lose my raptors now, it's earlier in the game, and it's a lot harder to break your full clear because you do get punished more. Because one, it's harder to kill people because have less items, less damage, less cooldown stuff like that. It's harder to farm it takes longer. So more camps, you're more your camps are sitting the longer it's going to take for you to clear them. And then, if you do lose camps early game, it snowballs way harder. So I'd say once you get your upgraded Smite, like your Rainbow Smite, like your first upgraded Smite, that's when it's a little bit easier to skip camps. You basically don't really want to break your full clear aside from that. But once you get your first item, for sure, you want to be skipping camps to look for proactive plays. You don't have to go for plays just to go for plays, but you should be looking for that. So I hope that was pretty helpful. Any questions, you can just always DM me or comment below and I'll try to get back to you.

Griffin

637,506 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

these 2 compilation truly got me in tears so i had to share it with yall, credit to op (main post in replies) for the edits 🥹 #JimmySea #จิมมี่ซี #jimmyyjp #sea_tawinan (sub for 1/2) 💜: sometime love is something that we do not need to explicitly express it, it's not necessary to do so. i think when people love each other, the most important period is the period when there are problems. 💜: whenever a problem arises, we'll talk about it 🩵: yes we talk when a problem arises 💜: but in the past we didn't do so 🩵: yeah we didn't do so in the past 🩵: when we have a problem, it's easy to fix the problem. because he speaks directly about it. in the past he reached out often until the end he's like ok we live our own lives. until after a while, i realised i should start to reach out to him too. because i felt, hey, i can't be this way, i need to try to adjust to him as well 🩵: because whenever there's anything that affects me, i no longer wait, in the past i will just stay silent. until i realised i should reach out to talk to him too. ---- 💜: whenever we have a problem, we can get through this together, it means, that person is the person we love. 🩵: i care for him a lot, but i don't say it! yes i care but i don't say it. i care and not say it out. 💜: i also care about the person i love all the time, but i don't explicitly express my care in words, but maybe more so by actions. 🩵: the thing that.. sometimes he don't express it out in words of "i love you" "i'm worried about you" but he does so in actions for you to know that he feels that way. he will use actions more than he does with words. and that's something i truly like about him. he supports you to his fullest no matter if it's about work or other things. ---- 💜: during the times that might be difficult or where there may be problems, those times when you have someone someone who loves you or who is there for you- 🩵: something to tell him? "i won't let your hand go". i won't let his hand go, no matter whatever we may face, i won't let go! i've been here with him for almost 5 years now. i feel that whatever that we may face in the future that may separate us, i wouldn't let him go. ---- (sub for 2/2) 🩵: i won't separate from him. i just feel that, since the beginning, we've been on the same boat and we have been through so much together. whatever hardships or arguments we may face, i will not let go of his hand. 🩵: i've already understood this person, i don't want to adjust with another person anymore. this person is already the best. no matter how silly or playful he is, i will be here. no matter how silly, stubborn or playful he may be, i won't separate from him. 💜: the previous sentence he said is really true 😂 🩵: noo i was just saying in a comparative manner- no matter what he is like, i already understand him. 💜: sea is a person who has emotionally supported me the most in the past 6 months. more than thanking him, i would like to apologise to him. sometimes, phi might not be as lovely or at times i'm physically present but my heart and mind is thinking about something else. but it's not about something ridiculous but more so things that i have to do in my life to survive, so i would like to say i'm sorry. i would like to apologise for the times that i have been neglectful. and thank you for trusting me always. 🩵: i know how he is like and with that, it makes me feel like - i don't want to separate from him. time for y'all to cry along with me because this edit beautifully portrayed jimmy's relationship and how you can see a distinctive contrast from the magazine interview in march 2025, to their recent interviews in sep and oct 2025. thei relationship has developed and bloomed so beautifully i'm so happy for them 😭

these 2 compilation truly got me in tears so i had to share it with yall, credit to op (main post in replies) for the edits 🥹 #JimmySea #จิมมี่ซี #jimmyyjp #sea_tawinan (sub for 1/2) 💜: sometime love is something that we do not need to explicitly express it, it's not necessary to do so. i think when people love each other, the most important period is the period when there are problems. 💜: whenever a problem arises, we'll talk about it 🩵: yes we talk when a problem arises 💜: but in the past we didn't do so 🩵: yeah we didn't do so in the past 🩵: when we have a problem, it's easy to fix the problem. because he speaks directly about it. in the past he reached out often until the end he's like ok we live our own lives. until after a while, i realised i should start to reach out to him too. because i felt, hey, i can't be this way, i need to try to adjust to him as well 🩵: because whenever there's anything that affects me, i no longer wait, in the past i will just stay silent. until i realised i should reach out to talk to him too. ---- 💜: whenever we have a problem, we can get through this together, it means, that person is the person we love. 🩵: i care for him a lot, but i don't say it! yes i care but i don't say it. i care and not say it out. 💜: i also care about the person i love all the time, but i don't explicitly express my care in words, but maybe more so by actions. 🩵: the thing that.. sometimes he don't express it out in words of "i love you" "i'm worried about you" but he does so in actions for you to know that he feels that way. he will use actions more than he does with words. and that's something i truly like about him. he supports you to his fullest no matter if it's about work or other things. ---- 💜: during the times that might be difficult or where there may be problems, those times when you have someone someone who loves you or who is there for you- 🩵: something to tell him? "i won't let your hand go". i won't let his hand go, no matter whatever we may face, i won't let go! i've been here with him for almost 5 years now. i feel that whatever that we may face in the future that may separate us, i wouldn't let him go. ---- (sub for 2/2) 🩵: i won't separate from him. i just feel that, since the beginning, we've been on the same boat and we have been through so much together. whatever hardships or arguments we may face, i will not let go of his hand. 🩵: i've already understood this person, i don't want to adjust with another person anymore. this person is already the best. no matter how silly or playful he is, i will be here. no matter how silly, stubborn or playful he may be, i won't separate from him. 💜: the previous sentence he said is really true 😂 🩵: noo i was just saying in a comparative manner- no matter what he is like, i already understand him. 💜: sea is a person who has emotionally supported me the most in the past 6 months. more than thanking him, i would like to apologise to him. sometimes, phi might not be as lovely or at times i'm physically present but my heart and mind is thinking about something else. but it's not about something ridiculous but more so things that i have to do in my life to survive, so i would like to say i'm sorry. i would like to apologise for the times that i have been neglectful. and thank you for trusting me always. 🩵: i know how he is like and with that, it makes me feel like - i don't want to separate from him. time for y'all to cry along with me because this edit beautifully portrayed jimmy's relationship and how you can see a distinctive contrast from the magazine interview in march 2025, to their recent interviews in sep and oct 2025. thei relationship has developed and bloomed so beautifully i'm so happy for them 😭

𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿 ʲˢ ♡ྀི

23,971 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

#WilliamEst #วิลเลี่ยมเอส ———— [2025 Year in Review] 🎸: Wow, that's a great question. Let me take my time with this... 🦈: This is going to be a long story—could probably talk about it for an hour. 🎸: If I had to summarize briefly, I feel like I've been constantly growing. More people know us now, and I feel like I've put more of myself into each project. The longer you're in this industry, the more you want to make your work better. 🦈: Honestly, this year has been like a roller coaster. Full of ups and downs, full of changes. But I think it's been an amazing year because we've really been through so much. This was also the year ThamePo aired, and seeing everything that's happened, I'm really happy. 🦈: I'm happy too. We often say we hope to keep growing together. From being paired up, auditioning together, being cast as the leads of ThamePo—back then we weren't even sure if we could work as a CP, if we'd get along, how the project would turn out, or if people would like us. But having come this far and been through so much, I think as long as you believe in yourself and believe in your partner... In the end, I'm just really happy to be where we are today, and I'm incredibly grateful for our fans' tremendous support. [Surprises of 2025] 🎸: Speaking of surprises, I'd say it's today. Because I never imagined I could win an acting award. This really exceeded my expectations. Receiving this award motivates me even more to act and to learn. I feel like I'm still lacking in this area—I've often asked P'Est or others for advice, just wanting to keep getting better. 🦈: There have been many memorable moments, but I also want to say today. I'm really happy to receive this award. I actually have a lot of trophies at home, but they're all from swimming competitions—from school to university, to national and international competitions. I never thought I could win an award outside of swimming. Today I received my first entertainment industry award, and my mom even texted saying she's proud of me. I'm happy to make the people around me proud, and I'm happy I chose this path. This award is also proof that I made the right choice. [Goals for 2026] 🎸: My goal for next year is to become a better actor. I want to keep improving my skills. 🎸: Also, I want to release solo single. I want to try and explore more different things, including various music styles. 🦈: I hope more people will pay attention to our work, and I hope more people will discover us. I also hope that both William's and my individual projects, as well as our collaborative work, can take us further. [Three Songs for 2025] 🦈: When it comes to three songs that represent 2025, everyone knows ระหว่างทาง (Along the Way) has to be one of them. 🦈: The lyrics of this song really fit us. We often say the road to success isn't easy, but because we have each other, it doesn't feel as hard. 🦈: There's also ยังคู่กัน (Still Together). We're still together, just like William said at the ThamePo Final EP—no matter what the future holds, we're still WilliamEst. 🦈: The last one is Nothing's Gonna Change My Love For You. Nothing can change our love for each other. Because I feel like we've already been through so many difficult things, and if something difficult happens again in the future, it won't be as hard as before. Even if it is hard, it can no longer change us. 🎸: Yes. My first choice is also ระหว่างทาง (Along the Way). I chose this song because getting to this point, standing here—it's been really hard. I never imagined what life would be like now, how many twists and drama we'd go through. But we faced problems together, learned together, and now everything is on track. This song is really touching. 🎸: Another one is คนสุดท้าย (The Last One). This song was also played at our fan meeting. We talked from the very beginning about how much we love this song, including because of the lyrics. I might have never said this before, but if I ever get to do another BL or something like that in the future, P'Est is my only partner. There won't be anyone else. 🎸: He's the first and the last. I don't want to get to know and adjust to a new person anymore because it's too exhausting. From getting to know each other, to truly understanding each other, to the chemistry we have now—this journey has been really difficult. So I've always thought this in my heart, and I've always believed it: I hope he's truly the last one. MC: How do you feel hearing this? 🦈: I'm very touched hearing this. Actually, I've always had this sense of security. When I feel uncertain, he's always the one who stays firm. Even though I know how he feels, having him say it in front of the media and everyone still surprises me. Because we really went through times when we never thought we'd be where we are today, so deep down I'd already prepared myself for all kinds of possibilities. But when those things didn't happen, I actually felt relieved, and in the end it made this relationship even stronger. 🎸: The last song is สิ่งที่มีกำลังเกิด (What's Happening). Every line, every part of this song really hits deep. It's like two people from different worlds meeting and then walking hand in hand—like some kind of destined fate. So I chose this one.

#WilliamEst #วิลเลี่ยมเอส ———— [2025 Year in Review] 🎸: Wow, that's a great question. Let me take my time with this... 🦈: This is going to be a long story—could probably talk about it for an hour. 🎸: If I had to summarize briefly, I feel like I've been constantly growing. More people know us now, and I feel like I've put more of myself into each project. The longer you're in this industry, the more you want to make your work better. 🦈: Honestly, this year has been like a roller coaster. Full of ups and downs, full of changes. But I think it's been an amazing year because we've really been through so much. This was also the year ThamePo aired, and seeing everything that's happened, I'm really happy. 🦈: I'm happy too. We often say we hope to keep growing together. From being paired up, auditioning together, being cast as the leads of ThamePo—back then we weren't even sure if we could work as a CP, if we'd get along, how the project would turn out, or if people would like us. But having come this far and been through so much, I think as long as you believe in yourself and believe in your partner... In the end, I'm just really happy to be where we are today, and I'm incredibly grateful for our fans' tremendous support. [Surprises of 2025] 🎸: Speaking of surprises, I'd say it's today. Because I never imagined I could win an acting award. This really exceeded my expectations. Receiving this award motivates me even more to act and to learn. I feel like I'm still lacking in this area—I've often asked P'Est or others for advice, just wanting to keep getting better. 🦈: There have been many memorable moments, but I also want to say today. I'm really happy to receive this award. I actually have a lot of trophies at home, but they're all from swimming competitions—from school to university, to national and international competitions. I never thought I could win an award outside of swimming. Today I received my first entertainment industry award, and my mom even texted saying she's proud of me. I'm happy to make the people around me proud, and I'm happy I chose this path. This award is also proof that I made the right choice. [Goals for 2026] 🎸: My goal for next year is to become a better actor. I want to keep improving my skills. 🎸: Also, I want to release solo single. I want to try and explore more different things, including various music styles. 🦈: I hope more people will pay attention to our work, and I hope more people will discover us. I also hope that both William's and my individual projects, as well as our collaborative work, can take us further. [Three Songs for 2025] 🦈: When it comes to three songs that represent 2025, everyone knows ระหว่างทาง (Along the Way) has to be one of them. 🦈: The lyrics of this song really fit us. We often say the road to success isn't easy, but because we have each other, it doesn't feel as hard. 🦈: There's also ยังคู่กัน (Still Together). We're still together, just like William said at the ThamePo Final EP—no matter what the future holds, we're still WilliamEst. 🦈: The last one is Nothing's Gonna Change My Love For You. Nothing can change our love for each other. Because I feel like we've already been through so many difficult things, and if something difficult happens again in the future, it won't be as hard as before. Even if it is hard, it can no longer change us. 🎸: Yes. My first choice is also ระหว่างทาง (Along the Way). I chose this song because getting to this point, standing here—it's been really hard. I never imagined what life would be like now, how many twists and drama we'd go through. But we faced problems together, learned together, and now everything is on track. This song is really touching. 🎸: Another one is คนสุดท้าย (The Last One). This song was also played at our fan meeting. We talked from the very beginning about how much we love this song, including because of the lyrics. I might have never said this before, but if I ever get to do another BL or something like that in the future, P'Est is my only partner. There won't be anyone else. 🎸: He's the first and the last. I don't want to get to know and adjust to a new person anymore because it's too exhausting. From getting to know each other, to truly understanding each other, to the chemistry we have now—this journey has been really difficult. So I've always thought this in my heart, and I've always believed it: I hope he's truly the last one. MC: How do you feel hearing this? 🦈: I'm very touched hearing this. Actually, I've always had this sense of security. When I feel uncertain, he's always the one who stays firm. Even though I know how he feels, having him say it in front of the media and everyone still surprises me. Because we really went through times when we never thought we'd be where we are today, so deep down I'd already prepared myself for all kinds of possibilities. But when those things didn't happen, I actually felt relieved, and in the end it made this relationship even stronger. 🎸: The last song is สิ่งที่มีกำลังเกิด (What's Happening). Every line, every part of this song really hits deep. It's like two people from different worlds meeting and then walking hand in hand—like some kind of destined fate. So I chose this one.

SUDA

61,018 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten