正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

"I heard Umar Khalid's speech. He is talking about responding to violence with non-violence. The Supreme Court judgement says they attended some meetings, and were part of some WhatsApp groups. How is this a terrorist activity?" – Justice Madan Lokur, former Supreme Court judge

Kaushik Raj

85,038 subscribers

123,035 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia speaks up on bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. "I am disappointed with the judgement (bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam). Supreme Court has misinterpreted K.A. Najeeb's case. In the K.A. Najeeb case, Supreme Court granted him bail considering that there are over 200 witnesses and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future. So, the possibility of completion of trial has to be considered along with the period of incarceration. In this case, there are 900 witnesses. But this part has not been touched upon by the Supreme Court."

Former Supreme Court judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia speaks up on bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam. "I am disappointed with the judgement (bail denial to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam). Supreme Court has misinterpreted K.A. Najeeb's case. In the K.A. Najeeb case, Supreme Court granted him bail considering that there are over 200 witnesses and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future. So, the possibility of completion of trial has to be considered along with the period of incarceration. In this case, there are 900 witnesses. But this part has not been touched upon by the Supreme Court."

Kaushik Raj

104,707 次观看 • 7 个月前

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was caught sneaking out of speaker Mike Johnson’s office. A Supreme Court justice should not have a private meeting with the speaker of the house. What were they talking about?

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was caught sneaking out of speaker Mike Johnson’s office. A Supreme Court justice should not have a private meeting with the speaker of the house. What were they talking about?

BlueDream

1,034,219 次观看 • 2 个月前

The very foundation of SIR is wrong and when it came before the Supreme Court, it should have been stopped. The court should have asked on what basis SIR is being carried out but it didn’t happen. — Former SC judge Madan Lokur in conversation with Kapil Sibal Ji

The very foundation of SIR is wrong and when it came before the Supreme Court, it should have been stopped. The court should have asked on what basis SIR is being carried out but it didn’t happen. — Former SC judge Madan Lokur in conversation with Kapil Sibal Ji

Shantanu

20,478 次观看 • 3 个月前

Is the Governor an Agent of the Union Government? Watch the latest episode of #dilsewithkapilsibal with three experts N.N. Vohra (Ex Governor J&K) Madan Lokur (Former Supreme Court Judge) and Dr. P Thiaga Rajan (Min of IT, Govt. of TN) Full Video link 👇

Is the Governor an Agent of the Union Government? Watch the latest episode of #dilsewithkapilsibal with three experts N.N. Vohra (Ex Governor J&K) Madan Lokur (Former Supreme Court Judge) and Dr. P Thiaga Rajan (Min of IT, Govt. of TN) Full Video link 👇

Kapil Sibal

36,016 次观看 • 2 年前

Here’s the scary part about Amy Coney Barrett, she’s young for a Supreme Court Justice. She’s going to be around for a long time. This is one of the worst Supreme Court picks by any Republican in history.

Here’s the scary part about Amy Coney Barrett, she’s young for a Supreme Court Justice. She’s going to be around for a long time. This is one of the worst Supreme Court picks by any Republican in history.

Derrick Evans

218,245 次观看 • 2 个月前

This Telugu Desam Party and JanaSena Party are only here to raise communal violence where state never saw earlier . Even after Supreme Court orders ,they are playing with GOD, this is contempt of court ? With NDTV

This Telugu Desam Party and JanaSena Party are only here to raise communal violence where state never saw earlier . Even after Supreme Court orders ,they are playing with GOD, this is contempt of court ? With NDTV

Karthik Yellapragada

24,246 次观看 • 7 个月前

“If you remember, I took my former boss, a sitting President to court 11 times. From trial court up to the Supreme Court. I swear I never saw any judge from the trial court to the Supreme Court and yet I got judgements against a sitting President. Do you think it is possible today?”. - Former Vice President, H.E, Atiku Abubakar

“If you remember, I took my former boss, a sitting President to court 11 times. From trial court up to the Supreme Court. I swear I never saw any judge from the trial court to the Supreme Court and yet I got judgements against a sitting President. Do you think it is possible today?”. - Former Vice President, H.E, Atiku Abubakar

DGov

167,699 次观看 • 5 个月前

It is an important day for Gadchiroli district as it got a new District and Additional Sessions Court in Aheri today, and that too in the august presence of the Supreme Court Judge Hon Justice Bhushan Gavai ji. I attended the inauguration ceremony, this morning, online. This Court will benefit 3 lakh citizens and 750 villages of Gadchiroli. Sharing my speech on this momentous occasion. #Maharashtra #Gadchiroli #development #court #Judiciary #Justice

It is an important day for Gadchiroli district as it got a new District and Additional Sessions Court in Aheri today, and that too in the august presence of the Supreme Court Judge Hon Justice Bhushan Gavai ji. I attended the inauguration ceremony, this morning, online. This Court will benefit 3 lakh citizens and 750 villages of Gadchiroli. Sharing my speech on this momentous occasion. #Maharashtra #Gadchiroli #development #court #Judiciary #Justice

Devendra Fadnavis

39,658 次观看 • 3 年前

What is the role of a media anchor? I'm shocked when I watch some of these media but I still watch it with the hope that one day they'll reform. Anchors, what they do is, they will mute some of the speakers. Reason is that, anchor is actually having an agenda and is asking the questions on somebody else's behalf. The anchor is having a political bias : Justice KM Joseph, former Supreme Court judge.

What is the role of a media anchor? I'm shocked when I watch some of these media but I still watch it with the hope that one day they'll reform. Anchors, what they do is, they will mute some of the speakers. Reason is that, anchor is actually having an agenda and is asking the questions on somebody else's behalf. The anchor is having a political bias : Justice KM Joseph, former Supreme Court judge.

Live Law

148,123 次观看 • 2 年前

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,478 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 NOW: Stephen Miller sounds the alarm that leftists are repeatedly plotting massive violence attempts on conservative US Supreme Court justices to influence rulings Amy Coney Barrett is a PRIME EXAMPLE of who they are swaying! "Clear threats of violence against our Supreme Court to try to shape how they rule on upcoming decisions. The leftist does this with the full desire, intent, and understanding that the threat of violence against a public figure or their family is meant to cal them into behaving or acting or conducting themselves differently."

🚨 NOW: Stephen Miller sounds the alarm that leftists are repeatedly plotting massive violence attempts on conservative US Supreme Court justices to influence rulings Amy Coney Barrett is a PRIME EXAMPLE of who they are swaying! "Clear threats of violence against our Supreme Court to try to shape how they rule on upcoming decisions. The leftist does this with the full desire, intent, and understanding that the threat of violence against a public figure or their family is meant to cal them into behaving or acting or conducting themselves differently."

Eric Daugherty

40,836 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jeffries says everything is on the table legislatively to deal with the Supreme Court: In the new Congress, we’re going to have to do something about this Supreme Court, and let me be very clear: everything is on the table.

Jeffries says everything is on the table legislatively to deal with the Supreme Court: In the new Congress, we’re going to have to do something about this Supreme Court, and let me be very clear: everything is on the table.

Acyn

620,764 次观看 • 4 个月前

Former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia explains why burning the American flag is protected free speech under the First Amendment: “If I were king, I would not allow people to go about burning the American flag. However, we have a First Amendment…”

Former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia explains why burning the American flag is protected free speech under the First Amendment: “If I were king, I would not allow people to go about burning the American flag. However, we have a First Amendment…”

Republicans against Trump

355,521 次观看 • 1 年前

Bessent on the Supreme Court examining Trump's tariffs: "This is one of President Trump's signature policies, and traditionally the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy... I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."

Bessent on the Supreme Court examining Trump's tariffs: "This is one of President Trump's signature policies, and traditionally the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy... I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."

FactPost

14,546 次观看 • 9 个月前

How can top court judges force a wife to live with a man she herself accused of domestic violence…? Is this the correct way of justice? Some of you will agree. Many of you will disagree.

How can top court judges force a wife to live with a man she herself accused of domestic violence…? Is this the correct way of justice? Some of you will agree. Many of you will disagree.

The Forgotten ‘Man’ 👨‍⚖️

24,787 次观看 • 4 个月前

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court rejecting her plea, Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan says, "This is not a personal setback. This is a setback to the democracy and the Constitution of India... I said this in the beginning that the members of the Election Commission were compromised. When our people when to the Election Commission, they did not answer us for 48 hours. The Supreme Court atlease heard our plea and gave a verdict..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court rejecting her plea, Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan says, "This is not a personal setback. This is a setback to the democracy and the Constitution of India... I said this in the beginning that the members of the Election Commission were compromised. When our people when to the Election Commission, they did not answer us for 48 hours. The Supreme Court atlease heard our plea and gave a verdict..."

ANI

49,934 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨🇧🇷THE GREAT EXPOSURE OF ALEXANDRE DE MORAES❗️ We were warned prior to his nomination as Supreme Court Judge that the Brazilian legal system was about to be torn apart. De Moraes’ past is tainted with violence, incompetence, and chaos. NOW is the time to FIGHT BACK✊💚

🚨🇧🇷THE GREAT EXPOSURE OF ALEXANDRE DE MORAES❗️ We were warned prior to his nomination as Supreme Court Judge that the Brazilian legal system was about to be torn apart. De Moraes’ past is tainted with violence, incompetence, and chaos. NOW is the time to FIGHT BACK✊💚

Naomi Seibt

602,726 次观看 • 2 年前