Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

I honestly do not understand how anyone expects to win the Presidency while treating politics like a content-creation project. You cannot be embarking on critical political assignments with content creators and individuals who have never built, won, led, or achieved anything of significance politically, and expect Nigerians to take... show more

Àlúbàríkà 🇳🇬

594,198 subscribers

14,107 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Prof Makau Mutua: I don’t understand why Sifuna is fighting to keep on sucking on mama’s titty of ODM. He should get the hell out. He should not waste time there; he does not like the party. ODM will outlast him. Sifuna was picked by Baba from political obscurity and made the SG of the party. His ingratitude is wrangling. He is a young man; he should be humble, and he should learn how to conduct himself. You cannot go to a political party like that and start threatening it when you are only 2 days old in the party #CitizenSundayLive

Prof Makau Mutua: I don’t understand why Sifuna is fighting to keep on sucking on mama’s titty of ODM. He should get the hell out. He should not waste time there; he does not like the party. ODM will outlast him. Sifuna was picked by Baba from political obscurity and made the SG of the party. His ingratitude is wrangling. He is a young man; he should be humble, and he should learn how to conduct himself. You cannot go to a political party like that and start threatening it when you are only 2 days old in the party #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

56,436 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The clearest evidence that Nelson Chamisa learnt nothing and forgot everything during his two-year hiatus, after he unceremoniously ran away from the leadership of his party in January 2024, is that he says he’s back in active politics to form and lead yet another “new” movement which he "shockingly claims will be similar to the 'liberation movement, that had no president and no constitution': Journalist: "And is this an announcement of the coming in of a new political party, or it's going to be a general movement; exactly what is this?" Nelson Chamisa: "I think I must help you. I said it's not a political party. It's a movement. It is, and a movement is like the liberation movement. Who was the president of the liberation movement? What was the constitution of the liberation movement?" [full video:

The clearest evidence that Nelson Chamisa learnt nothing and forgot everything during his two-year hiatus, after he unceremoniously ran away from the leadership of his party in January 2024, is that he says he’s back in active politics to form and lead yet another “new” movement which he "shockingly claims will be similar to the 'liberation movement, that had no president and no constitution': Journalist: "And is this an announcement of the coming in of a new political party, or it's going to be a general movement; exactly what is this?" Nelson Chamisa: "I think I must help you. I said it's not a political party. It's a movement. It is, and a movement is like the liberation movement. Who was the president of the liberation movement? What was the constitution of the liberation movement?" [full video:

Prof Jonathan Moyo

61,143 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The Circle (2000, Panahi)/ Iran "Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date." --- Jafar Panahi Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: The subject matter of 'The Circle' (2000) is controversial. You mentioned that the film is still banned in Iran. In fact, when I was watching the film, I realized that through the characters, there’s a lot of fear about the system, the establishment, the police. The women can’t smoke; they have to wear the chador; they seem to want to hide every time. This is all very clear from watching the film. Did you deliberately want to make a statement about the political situation in Iran? Panahi: I have to tell you again that I’m not a political person. I don’t like political movies. But I take every opportunity to comment on the social issues. I talk about the current issues. To me it’s not important what is the reason for what has happened. Whether it’s political reasons or geographical reasons: these are not important—but the condition, the social issues. It is important to me to talk about the plight of humanity at that time. I don’t want to give a political view, or start a political war. I think that the artist should rise above this. Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date. So it doesn’t really serve a political purpose. Then it can be everlasting, for always, and it could be for anywhere. But I know that politically, with the film authorities, with any kind of film that has some political background in it, they would take issue with it. And for this reason, that is what the problem is. Interviewer: Still, your film makes a very strong statement about the problems that women face in Iran. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. Interviewer: So that is humanitarian, of course, but it’s also political. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. It has the elements. It all depends on how you look at it. If a person has only political views, then he will only see the political. But if you are a poet or an artist, then you see other things as well in the movie. If you are a socialist, you see political or economic or whatever different points of view. You mustn’t look at a film with only one point of view. If you want to see 'The Circle' (2000) as political, then it is one of the most political movies in Iran. By political, I mean partisan politics. But even the police, I didn’t want to show them as bad. In the first instance, you are afraid of the police. Because you are looking at them from the point of view of someone who is now in prison. And normally you see him in a long shot, but when they come nearer and you see them in a medium shot, you can see their human faces. Then it comes down to, “Do you need any help?” But he goes back again and becomes frightening. If I were being political, then I would always show the police as dangerous or bad persons." (Jafar Panahi's interview with Stephen Teo, Senses of Cinema, 2001)

The Circle (2000, Panahi)/ Iran "Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date." --- Jafar Panahi Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: The subject matter of 'The Circle' (2000) is controversial. You mentioned that the film is still banned in Iran. In fact, when I was watching the film, I realized that through the characters, there’s a lot of fear about the system, the establishment, the police. The women can’t smoke; they have to wear the chador; they seem to want to hide every time. This is all very clear from watching the film. Did you deliberately want to make a statement about the political situation in Iran? Panahi: I have to tell you again that I’m not a political person. I don’t like political movies. But I take every opportunity to comment on the social issues. I talk about the current issues. To me it’s not important what is the reason for what has happened. Whether it’s political reasons or geographical reasons: these are not important—but the condition, the social issues. It is important to me to talk about the plight of humanity at that time. I don’t want to give a political view, or start a political war. I think that the artist should rise above this. Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date. So it doesn’t really serve a political purpose. Then it can be everlasting, for always, and it could be for anywhere. But I know that politically, with the film authorities, with any kind of film that has some political background in it, they would take issue with it. And for this reason, that is what the problem is. Interviewer: Still, your film makes a very strong statement about the problems that women face in Iran. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. Interviewer: So that is humanitarian, of course, but it’s also political. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. It has the elements. It all depends on how you look at it. If a person has only political views, then he will only see the political. But if you are a poet or an artist, then you see other things as well in the movie. If you are a socialist, you see political or economic or whatever different points of view. You mustn’t look at a film with only one point of view. If you want to see 'The Circle' (2000) as political, then it is one of the most political movies in Iran. By political, I mean partisan politics. But even the police, I didn’t want to show them as bad. In the first instance, you are afraid of the police. Because you are looking at them from the point of view of someone who is now in prison. And normally you see him in a long shot, but when they come nearer and you see them in a medium shot, you can see their human faces. Then it comes down to, “Do you need any help?” But he goes back again and becomes frightening. If I were being political, then I would always show the police as dangerous or bad persons." (Jafar Panahi's interview with Stephen Teo, Senses of Cinema, 2001)

DepressedBergman

43,871 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Caitlin Clark on how she gets covered by the media: "I think there's just like a false characterization of who I am sometimes. And I get it like as a reporter or as a blogger, like you can write an opinion piece and that's your job and whatever. But at the same time, like you don't know me. Like we've never had a conversation. I get people have a job to do. But at the same time, like don't make accusations about my character and who I am when you don't know me. I understand this is your job and this is your profession, and this is what you get to do. And basketball is my profession, what I get to do. And the reason I play it is when I step in between the lines, I love it. And that's what's so fun about it for me is like, I get to compete. This was always my dream. And nobody should ever try to take that away from me"

Caitlin Clark on how she gets covered by the media: "I think there's just like a false characterization of who I am sometimes. And I get it like as a reporter or as a blogger, like you can write an opinion piece and that's your job and whatever. But at the same time, like you don't know me. Like we've never had a conversation. I get people have a job to do. But at the same time, like don't make accusations about my character and who I am when you don't know me. I understand this is your job and this is your profession, and this is what you get to do. And basketball is my profession, what I get to do. And the reason I play it is when I step in between the lines, I love it. And that's what's so fun about it for me is like, I get to compete. This was always my dream. And nobody should ever try to take that away from me"

Oh No He Didn't

260,949 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Today’s developments highlight a stark difference in our political culture. In #KhyberPakhtunkhwa, the PPP’s political activities are too often met with obstruction and undue force, while CM KP Sohail Afridi was welcomed in Sindh with courtesy and respect. This is not a matter of provincial competition; it is a question of political maturity and responsible leadership. The #PPP has consistently demonstrated that political disagreement can be managed through dialogue, tolerance, and respect. The KP government should reflect on it, and if there is a willingness to learn, the PPP has already offered a practical demonstration of what political maturity looks like.

Today’s developments highlight a stark difference in our political culture. In #KhyberPakhtunkhwa, the PPP’s political activities are too often met with obstruction and undue force, while CM KP Sohail Afridi was welcomed in Sindh with courtesy and respect. This is not a matter of provincial competition; it is a question of political maturity and responsible leadership. The #PPP has consistently demonstrated that political disagreement can be managed through dialogue, tolerance, and respect. The KP government should reflect on it, and if there is a willingness to learn, the PPP has already offered a practical demonstration of what political maturity looks like.

Faisal Karim Kundi

28,016 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The FKR movement was run more like a political campaign or crisis PR firm than a traditional criminal defense. It used modern influencer tactics, media manipulation, social engineering and fundraising coordination to shape public perception. Whether or not you believe Karen's sordid tale, there’s no denying this was a well-organized, high-impact marketing campaign...and a case study in how justice and public opinion can be blurred in the age of social media.

The FKR movement was run more like a political campaign or crisis PR firm than a traditional criminal defense. It used modern influencer tactics, media manipulation, social engineering and fundraising coordination to shape public perception. Whether or not you believe Karen's sordid tale, there’s no denying this was a well-organized, high-impact marketing campaign...and a case study in how justice and public opinion can be blurred in the age of social media.

Jamz

14,095 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Zelensky to Poland: We cannot be non-partners or non-friends with Poland, because we are neighbors. If you are not a partner, not a friend, then who are you? Over the years and decades, that turns into what we have with the Russians — disrespect, aggression, and the radicalization of society. Radicalizing society leads to what? To ratings. To political gains. It is a political struggle that can end very badly, with a very dangerous escalation. I believe you cannot earn political points or political dividends from hatred, because in the long run it will lead to bad relations between countries and peoples.

Zelensky to Poland: We cannot be non-partners or non-friends with Poland, because we are neighbors. If you are not a partner, not a friend, then who are you? Over the years and decades, that turns into what we have with the Russians — disrespect, aggression, and the radicalization of society. Radicalizing society leads to what? To ratings. To political gains. It is a political struggle that can end very badly, with a very dangerous escalation. I believe you cannot earn political points or political dividends from hatred, because in the long run it will lead to bad relations between countries and peoples.

Clash Report

51,932 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I don’t even have someone to film content for OF with, I used to have “help” from a friend, but it felt so forced and he clearly hated the camera and felt like a chore, I stopped doing it, and today most of my content is solo. People say our job is easy but I haven’t met a single guy okay with social media creation.

I don’t even have someone to film content for OF with, I used to have “help” from a friend, but it felt so forced and he clearly hated the camera and felt like a chore, I stopped doing it, and today most of my content is solo. People say our job is easy but I haven’t met a single guy okay with social media creation.

Isa Sato

16,953 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

People often wonder why the abusive DMK IT wing has continuously targeted me with baseless and degrading allegations, calling me things like running a spa or massage centre. This is not political criticism- it is a deliberate attempt to shame, humiliate, and silence a woman’s voice. In this 9-minute video, I have shared few issues I went through- the targeting, trauma, and humiliation created by DMK ecosystem. All of this happened simply because I never belonged to them and chose to speak up for the people and stand by the truth. Please take a moment to watch and understand. This is not just my story- this is how both women and men are systematically attacked using political power. If you vote for them again, it is a vote against women’s safety. PLS DO NOT VOTE FOR DMK!! NEVER AGAIN!!!

People often wonder why the abusive DMK IT wing has continuously targeted me with baseless and degrading allegations, calling me things like running a spa or massage centre. This is not political criticism- it is a deliberate attempt to shame, humiliate, and silence a woman’s voice. In this 9-minute video, I have shared few issues I went through- the targeting, trauma, and humiliation created by DMK ecosystem. All of this happened simply because I never belonged to them and chose to speak up for the people and stand by the truth. Please take a moment to watch and understand. This is not just my story- this is how both women and men are systematically attacked using political power. If you vote for them again, it is a vote against women’s safety. PLS DO NOT VOTE FOR DMK!! NEVER AGAIN!!!

Sonia Arunkumar

26,118 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Kiambu is a region, and we have the numbers to stand on our own. With over 1.5 million votes, we have the capacity to form and sustain our own political party. We cannot continue being politically subordinate to leaders from Nyeri or Murang’a. It is time for Kiambu to assert its political voice, negotiate from a position of strength, and chart its own political destiny.

Kiambu is a region, and we have the numbers to stand on our own. With over 1.5 million votes, we have the capacity to form and sustain our own political party. We cannot continue being politically subordinate to leaders from Nyeri or Murang’a. It is time for Kiambu to assert its political voice, negotiate from a position of strength, and chart its own political destiny.

Eng John Macharia

74,535 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

As many of you would know by now I did not regain my seat in the Senate. My final day as a Senator for Queensland is Monday, 30 June. While this is a disappointing outcome, it was still a very good result given the short lead time and lack of mainstream media attention that the Party and I received. The efforts of everyone involved in our campaign have been inspiring and have laid the groundwork for a genuine grassroots political movement. While it will take a lot of work, I think we owe it to our children to keep fighting the prevailing political forces. We have been badly let down by our institutions and change is only going to come from the ground up. Over the next six months, I will set up state divisions and branches to grow the membership of People First with a view to running candidates again in the next federal election and State elections where resources permit. We already have over 2,000 members and aim to have more than 5,000 members by the start of 2028. People First has the best policies and, more importantly, the know-how to solve Australia’s problems. Thank you to everyone who has volunteered and supported the party. I appreciate your efforts and look forward to continuing the fight over the next three years. Congratulations to everyone who ran as a candidate in the election. Regardless of your political views, our democracy is only as good as the level of participation in it. If you would like to be part of the fight going forward you can join the party, donate, or register to volunteer at

As many of you would know by now I did not regain my seat in the Senate. My final day as a Senator for Queensland is Monday, 30 June. While this is a disappointing outcome, it was still a very good result given the short lead time and lack of mainstream media attention that the Party and I received. The efforts of everyone involved in our campaign have been inspiring and have laid the groundwork for a genuine grassroots political movement. While it will take a lot of work, I think we owe it to our children to keep fighting the prevailing political forces. We have been badly let down by our institutions and change is only going to come from the ground up. Over the next six months, I will set up state divisions and branches to grow the membership of People First with a view to running candidates again in the next federal election and State elections where resources permit. We already have over 2,000 members and aim to have more than 5,000 members by the start of 2028. People First has the best policies and, more importantly, the know-how to solve Australia’s problems. Thank you to everyone who has volunteered and supported the party. I appreciate your efforts and look forward to continuing the fight over the next three years. Congratulations to everyone who ran as a candidate in the election. Regardless of your political views, our democracy is only as good as the level of participation in it. If you would like to be part of the fight going forward you can join the party, donate, or register to volunteer at

Gerard Rennick

78,147 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

HOW OTHERS SEE IT The narrative on this video is deadly serious. Its audience can ignore the content of the video, only to its own downfall. Because, truth be told, this is the best explanation that if you want to understand anyone, don't go by what they say about themselves since, more often than not, what they say is self-indulgent propaganda; therefore its best to go by the consequences of their decisions or actions. Actions speak louder than words. Indeed, a political leader cannot run a structureless political party with no constitution - as the only office bearer with sole powers to appoint everyone else by giving them tasks or assignments - only to suddenly turnaround to quit the leadership of the party abruptly and unprocedurally, claiming that the party has been infiltrated and contaminated by some enemy. Surely, if the claims of infiltration and contamination are true, then only the political leader who ran the structureless party with no constitution; but with sole appointing powers must take full and all responsibility for the alleged infiltration and contamination of the party. Also, that political leader must forget about getting any trust from any serious people to lead any serious political party or movement, ever again. Once bitten, twice shy!

HOW OTHERS SEE IT The narrative on this video is deadly serious. Its audience can ignore the content of the video, only to its own downfall. Because, truth be told, this is the best explanation that if you want to understand anyone, don't go by what they say about themselves since, more often than not, what they say is self-indulgent propaganda; therefore its best to go by the consequences of their decisions or actions. Actions speak louder than words. Indeed, a political leader cannot run a structureless political party with no constitution - as the only office bearer with sole powers to appoint everyone else by giving them tasks or assignments - only to suddenly turnaround to quit the leadership of the party abruptly and unprocedurally, claiming that the party has been infiltrated and contaminated by some enemy. Surely, if the claims of infiltration and contamination are true, then only the political leader who ran the structureless party with no constitution; but with sole appointing powers must take full and all responsibility for the alleged infiltration and contamination of the party. Also, that political leader must forget about getting any trust from any serious people to lead any serious political party or movement, ever again. Once bitten, twice shy!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

90,556 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

As a Christian, I really abhor when churches are turned to political grounds, pastors becoming tool of politics. The pulpit should not be used for politics. It is wrong yesterday, today and tomorrow!! I condemn this. We are making Christianity to be mocked! Like Onaiyekan, like this CAC!!!

As a Christian, I really abhor when churches are turned to political grounds, pastors becoming tool of politics. The pulpit should not be used for politics. It is wrong yesterday, today and tomorrow!! I condemn this. We are making Christianity to be mocked! Like Onaiyekan, like this CAC!!!

Ogbeni

20,766 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

What a foolish response. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela was a giant of the liberation struggle. Thabo Mbeki was a key figure in the ANC in exile, working closely with O.R. Tambo. Max Sisulu and Lindiwe Sisulu were activists in their own right, with their own political records and contributions. Trying to compare that with Jacob Zuma appointing his son Duduzane as Deputy President of the MK Party is absurd. The MK Party is not being run like a democratic political movement; it is being run like a family business, and that is what it is. The party has become a vehicle for Jacob Zuma to pursue personal vendettas, protect his financial interests and fight his perceived enemies. His son has no comparable political credentials and is linked to the Gupta network where he was a director. The Guptas are synonymous with the looting of South Africa’s public resources during the state capture era. To equate Duduzane’s appointment with the achievements and sacrifices of people like Winnie Madikizela-Mandela and Thabo Mbeki is not just historically inaccurate and an insult; it is intellectually dishonest. It is an insult to South Africa’s liberation history. What Jacob Zuma is doing is exactly the kind of behaviour that those who oppose democracy point to when they argue that democracy does not work in Africa. They use examples like this to claim that elections simply replace one form of patronage with another. There is a reason why this looks so familiar. In Equatorial Guinea, President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo appointed his son, Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue who is widely known as Teodorín, as Vice President while he remained President. It became a textbook example of dynastic politics masquerading as democracy. That is what the MK Party is increasingly beginning to resemble. Political parties are supposed to serve the people, not families. Leadership positions should be earned through merit, experience and democratic processes, not inherited through bloodlines. MK supporters are free to defend this decision if they wish, but trying to justify blatant nepotism only weakens their argument. You cannot claim to be fighting for democracy while applauding the concentration of power within one family. That is not democratic renewal. It is dynastic politics dressed up as a political movement.

What a foolish response. Winnie Madikizela-Mandela was a giant of the liberation struggle. Thabo Mbeki was a key figure in the ANC in exile, working closely with O.R. Tambo. Max Sisulu and Lindiwe Sisulu were activists in their own right, with their own political records and contributions. Trying to compare that with Jacob Zuma appointing his son Duduzane as Deputy President of the MK Party is absurd. The MK Party is not being run like a democratic political movement; it is being run like a family business, and that is what it is. The party has become a vehicle for Jacob Zuma to pursue personal vendettas, protect his financial interests and fight his perceived enemies. His son has no comparable political credentials and is linked to the Gupta network where he was a director. The Guptas are synonymous with the looting of South Africa’s public resources during the state capture era. To equate Duduzane’s appointment with the achievements and sacrifices of people like Winnie Madikizela-Mandela and Thabo Mbeki is not just historically inaccurate and an insult; it is intellectually dishonest. It is an insult to South Africa’s liberation history. What Jacob Zuma is doing is exactly the kind of behaviour that those who oppose democracy point to when they argue that democracy does not work in Africa. They use examples like this to claim that elections simply replace one form of patronage with another. There is a reason why this looks so familiar. In Equatorial Guinea, President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo appointed his son, Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue who is widely known as Teodorín, as Vice President while he remained President. It became a textbook example of dynastic politics masquerading as democracy. That is what the MK Party is increasingly beginning to resemble. Political parties are supposed to serve the people, not families. Leadership positions should be earned through merit, experience and democratic processes, not inherited through bloodlines. MK supporters are free to defend this decision if they wish, but trying to justify blatant nepotism only weakens their argument. You cannot claim to be fighting for democracy while applauding the concentration of power within one family. That is not democratic renewal. It is dynastic politics dressed up as a political movement.

Hopewell Chin’ono

43,815 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

"You CANNOT be a practicing Catholic and be part of the current democratic party" Pastors, now is not the time to be neutral. When you say, “I don’t want to get political,” it’s like saying “I don’t want to take a stand for righteousness.”

"You CANNOT be a practicing Catholic and be part of the current democratic party" Pastors, now is not the time to be neutral. When you say, “I don’t want to get political,” it’s like saying “I don’t want to take a stand for righteousness.”

👑💥 Serenity 💥👑

1,211,233 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

It’s honestly a shame that the PPC would choose to put something like this out into the world. As a political party, you would expect more integrity. Especially if the goal is to show Canadians what a better future could look like. I didn’t go anywhere to endorse a party. I went to learn. I always do. Learning requires listening, and listening requires hearing more than one side. The system is not designed for us to win. I won’t ever believe it is. No party is coming to save us. No one is coming to protect us. If we want a future that works for our kids, we have to use our brains, ask better questions, and actually understand what’s happening around us and you cannot do that if you only ever allow yourself to hear one narrative. Why does it feel like we are regressing? Seriously.

It’s honestly a shame that the PPC would choose to put something like this out into the world. As a political party, you would expect more integrity. Especially if the goal is to show Canadians what a better future could look like. I didn’t go anywhere to endorse a party. I went to learn. I always do. Learning requires listening, and listening requires hearing more than one side. The system is not designed for us to win. I won’t ever believe it is. No party is coming to save us. No one is coming to protect us. If we want a future that works for our kids, we have to use our brains, ask better questions, and actually understand what’s happening around us and you cannot do that if you only ever allow yourself to hear one narrative. Why does it feel like we are regressing? Seriously.

Unfiltered With Kels

14,405 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

What’s wrong with Starmer? Why is it so difficult for him to understand that Islam is not like other religions? Hinduism, Judaism, and Christianity do not have a religious mandate to acquire political power and enforce their worldview on the entire society. Why is he so ignorant of the fact that Islamic public celebrations are not religious, but political activism?

What’s wrong with Starmer? Why is it so difficult for him to understand that Islam is not like other religions? Hinduism, Judaism, and Christianity do not have a religious mandate to acquire political power and enforce their worldview on the entire society. Why is he so ignorant of the fact that Islamic public celebrations are not religious, but political activism?

Dan Burmawi

113,740 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This is not protest. This is a public mock execution of a sitting politician. Staging a guillotine, marching an effigy of Winston Peters to “the chop,” and filming the countdown is the deliberate normalisation of political violence. It is grotesque, dangerous, and has no place in a democracy. Media: Cover this as if it was a right wing/conservative organisation. Police: Take action and investigate the organisers. Political parties and MPs: condemn this or own the silence. Disagree with our leader all you like. Do not celebrate his symbolic beheading. To those who staged this: NZ First is unafraid of your violent desires. If you step to, we will defend ourselves with ruthless aggression and put you down.

This is not protest. This is a public mock execution of a sitting politician. Staging a guillotine, marching an effigy of Winston Peters to “the chop,” and filming the countdown is the deliberate normalisation of political violence. It is grotesque, dangerous, and has no place in a democracy. Media: Cover this as if it was a right wing/conservative organisation. Police: Take action and investigate the organisers. Political parties and MPs: condemn this or own the silence. Disagree with our leader all you like. Do not celebrate his symbolic beheading. To those who staged this: NZ First is unafraid of your violent desires. If you step to, we will defend ourselves with ruthless aggression and put you down.

Elliot Ikilei - NZ First Candidate

16,370 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce