Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

I hope the Silver Palace devs optimize the game further. I’m only getting around 60–65 FPS right now. Please take your time with the optimization! 🙏 → Ryzen 7 5800X3D → RTX 5060 Ti 16GB → 48GB RAM → 2TB SSD → DLSS Quality + Very High Settings (Not...

135,927 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

In my previous post about the #Nioh3 demo, I mentioned that when the game isn’t consistently holding 60 FPS or 120 FPS, several issues can show up. Here’s a clearer breakdown of what's going on. The main reason is that the game speed and physics are tied to the frame rate. When you enable the 120 FPS cap, the engine start overreacting and pushes CPU usage very high, even if the game is still running at around 60 FPS (as shown in the first example). In the second clip, you can see the uneven, jittery camera movement I mentioned before. Notice how much smoother 60 FPS and 120 FPS look compared to the unlocked side. Also, camera movement at 60 FPS is slightly faster than at 120 FPS. In the third clip, player movement is slower when the frame rate is unlocked. This doesn’t happen all the time, but it shows up often enough to be noticeable. Because of how the Katana Engine behaves, the game is clearly designed around 60 FPS. Running at 120 FPS is possible, but it’s only recommended if your system can maintain that target almost all the time, which isn’t easy to achieve. There’s also an alternative workaround where you select the 60 (locked) option and enable Frame Generation (DLSS or FSR 3), as shown in the last clip. The downside is that DLSS Frame Generation tends to show the same stuttery look as when the frame rate isn’t holding a fixed target, likely due to Reflex keeping the frame rate slightly below target. FSR Frame Generation, on the other hand, looks much smoother and works better here.

BenchmarKing

17,820 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

To all the Dense & Uneducated Pretendo fans complaining about #NintendoSwitch2 Game KeyCards: - Game KeyCards require a ONE time download - Game KeyCards are NOT tied to an account - Game KeyCards are NOT tied to the eShop - Game KeyCards function exactly like regular game cards - Switch 2 has only TWO card options available(For now) to Devs - 64GB Regular card & Game KeyCard - NS2 Cards are more advanced tech and more expensive to make than NS1 Cards - Game KeyCards reduce development time as 3rd Parties do not have to include Card production - Game KeyCards gives NS2 FULL content, Feature, and Visual parity for 3rd party games since Devs do not have to downgrade/Strip a game to fit on a 64GB Card. Large games & high-quality assets are very difficult to fit on a 64GB game card - Game KeyCards insures game pricing parity with other consoles. Otherwise, the production cost will be passed on to you in the form of a higher price for the same game on other consoles. Unless 3rd party is confident the production cost will be offset by High sales of the 64GB game card -Without the invention of Game KeyCards you would see digital only 3rd party games or, Most Likely, 3rd party games not released on Switch 2 at all - NS2 game cards & Game Keycards will balance out as production costs drop over time, and Nintendo will be able to make higher capacity Game Cards - Nintendo invented Game KeyCards as a roadblock to stop the push for a digital only games industry - Anything you can do with a NS2 Physical game card, you can do with a Game KeyCard So please STFU with the lies, misinformation, and delusional BS. ENJOY the best & equal 3rd party support on Nintendo console in DECADES, and let this situation play out like it's supposed to 🫶🏽

NintenGOD

21,944 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

DLSS 4.5 performance cost on the RTX 4070 Super, tested in #TheLastOfUs, #ArcRaiders, and #RedDeadRedemption2 at 2160p (4K). This time, I replaced the games default CNN models with native 4K to show how the DLSS Transformer model compares against native TAA / TSR. I also included a comparison between the new presets using Performance mode and Preset K in Quality mode. The Last of Us Part I Performance mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~59% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~13% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Quality mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~35% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~23% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~17% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~5% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~13% gain Arc Raiders Performance mode – Native (TSR) → Transformer Preset K: ~80% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Quality mode – Native (TSR) → Transformer Preset K: ~47% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~21% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~16% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~5% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~13% gain Red Dead Redemption 2 Performance mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~15% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~4% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~0% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~6% gain At 4K, The performance cost of the new presets is more significant than at 1440p, especially in Quality mode, which to be fair, doesn’t really make much sense to use at this resolution on a mid range GPU even with Preset K. In most cases, Preset L and M offer good image quality at 4K in Performance Mode. But right now, I think the biggest and most noticeable visual issue with these new presets is the oversharpening in some games, like The Last of Us. This problem is even more obvious at this resolution especially with Preset M.

BenchmarKing

31,353 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

I didn’t expect Crimson Desert to grow on me this much, but here we are. 🫢 After putting more hours into Crimson Desert and getting close to the ten hour mark, I’ll be honest: my opinion of the game has shifted in a much more positive direction. Combat feels significantly better now that I’ve unlocked more skills, exploration is a ton of fun, and while the story is basically nonexistent, I personally don’t mind since I’m not the type of player who needs heavy narrative to enjoy a game. I’ve also done a few puzzles, and so far I’m really enjoying them. I genuinely appreciate that the game does not hold your hand. Enough with the yellow paint in every modern game. Developers should just force us to actually think 🤣 I’m constantly unlocking or discovering something new every couple of minutes. The game is absolutely massive. On the technical side, most of the visual issues I had are now gone after turning off DLSS and playing at native resolution, along with lowering lighting from Max to Cinematic. One of these changes, or maybe both, made the game far more stable, and visually it now looks phenomenal. I still find myself stopping just to admire how beautiful it is. My rating has gone from a 7-7.5 to an 8.5-9, and based on what I’ve played so far, that jump feels completely justified. The overall takeaway is that Crimson Desert does not fully click until you unlock more of its systems. The early hours undersell it, but once combat, exploration, puzzles and the world open up, the experience becomes dramatically better. I also love this intro when you start the game or load a save. It gives the whole experience a special feeling and sets the tone perfectly every single time. :)

𝑨𝒔𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝑶𝒏𝒆

26,852 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce