Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

I just learned from this video that Forest Essentials will soon be fully owned by Estée Lauder, and honestly I’m really upset about it. Forest Essentials was created because its founder couldn’t find products that truly reflected the beauty of Ayurveda. It was supposed to be about honoring ancient... Indian wisdom, traditional ingredients, and a philosophy that values balance, nature, and care. So seeing it end up fully owned by a massive Western beauty conglomerate is deeply disappointing to me. Ayurveda is not just a trend or a marketing story. It’s thousands of years of knowledge and tradition. And it’s painful to watch something built on that heritage be absorbed by companies whose main interest is profit. Maybe the products will stay the same. Maybe they won’t. But for me, something important has already changed. Because of that, I won’t be buying Forest Essentials anymore. I would rather support brands that genuinely respect and protect the traditions they come from. I want to support Indian brands owned and run by Hindus, brands that truly honor Ayurveda and respect the sacred knowledge it carries. Ayurveda is more than skincare. It’s our culture, our wisdom, and it deserves to remain in Indian hands. Forest Essentials → being fully acquired by Estée Lauder Companies Kama Ayurveda → majority owned by Puig Dr. Sheth’s → majority stake acquired by Honasa Consumer (the parent company of Mamaearth) These deals happen because global beauty groups want access to India’s fast-growing beauty and wellness market, especially areas like Ayurveda and natural skincare.show more

JIX5A

63,579 subscribers

155,520 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I am quite happy that India's pseudoscience mascot decided to interview this Ayurveda practitioner. It clears a lot about the fact that Ayurveda is indeed a pseudoscience and none of its principles are worthy of being considered remotely "scientific" and that it can never be tested. This essentially means that we must not research anything in Ayurveda because it is a colossal waste of time and money. Listen to this intensely foolish conversation on how Ayurveda describes the cause for alopecia and how it is treated. I have never heard such utter nonsense on a large public platform like this. I am not even sure why 100s of 1000s of people login to this YouTube channel to watch the cringefest that is every millisecond, an insult to the neuronal circuits of the brain and an embarrassment to the existence of the evolved human brain. The whole aspect of Vata, Pita and Kapha principles that guide Ayurveda & diagnosis and treatment in Ayurveda are based on obsolete theories of air, mucus and bile imbalance leading to disease. These theories were made at a time when humans did not evolve to understand anatomy and physiology. "Humoral Theory of health and disease is absolute junk." Alopecia cannot be treat by rubbing a leaf. The reason for Alopecia is not a microlevel Kapha-style mucus block of the scalp. Here is what is real: HAIR LOSS TYPES: ALOPECIA AREATA DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT from I cannot beleive I have to debunk this ancient junk even in 2023. India is regressing in many ways than more in healthcare and health-seeking behaviour, it is worrisome - because seemingly educated fools like these two, who speak English, but do not make sense, are now controlling the healthcare spectrum on social media.

I am quite happy that India's pseudoscience mascot decided to interview this Ayurveda practitioner. It clears a lot about the fact that Ayurveda is indeed a pseudoscience and none of its principles are worthy of being considered remotely "scientific" and that it can never be tested. This essentially means that we must not research anything in Ayurveda because it is a colossal waste of time and money. Listen to this intensely foolish conversation on how Ayurveda describes the cause for alopecia and how it is treated. I have never heard such utter nonsense on a large public platform like this. I am not even sure why 100s of 1000s of people login to this YouTube channel to watch the cringefest that is every millisecond, an insult to the neuronal circuits of the brain and an embarrassment to the existence of the evolved human brain. The whole aspect of Vata, Pita and Kapha principles that guide Ayurveda & diagnosis and treatment in Ayurveda are based on obsolete theories of air, mucus and bile imbalance leading to disease. These theories were made at a time when humans did not evolve to understand anatomy and physiology. "Humoral Theory of health and disease is absolute junk." Alopecia cannot be treat by rubbing a leaf. The reason for Alopecia is not a microlevel Kapha-style mucus block of the scalp. Here is what is real: HAIR LOSS TYPES: ALOPECIA AREATA DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT from I cannot beleive I have to debunk this ancient junk even in 2023. India is regressing in many ways than more in healthcare and health-seeking behaviour, it is worrisome - because seemingly educated fools like these two, who speak English, but do not make sense, are now controlling the healthcare spectrum on social media.

TheLiverDoc™

684,750 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

At 28 she had nothing. At 45 she built a 8,000 crore global ayurveda empire Great brands aren't built overnight. They're built with persistence. Forest Essentials is the proof.

At 28 she had nothing. At 45 she built a 8,000 crore global ayurveda empire Great brands aren't built overnight. They're built with persistence. Forest Essentials is the proof.

JIX5A

60,465 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Weinstein: "I think this is the thing that I haven’t heard anybody else say. Maybe others have. But the thing that is so confusing about what’s going on in the present, what’s now begun in Iran, is if I just look at it like an anthropologist. That’s a holy war. It’s a holy war, but it’s being led by secular Jews." Carlson: "Exactly." Weinstein: " And it is that secularness that cloaks it, that makes it look like something it isn’t. And I’m not saying—look, I am no fan of the Iranian theocracy, right? I couldn’t be more frightened by that structure for the same reason I don’t want to see a holy war initiated by Israel. Frankly, holy war has no place in a world where we should be moving towards the values of the modern West." Carlson: "Because it’s hard to resolve them. Very hard."

Weinstein: "I think this is the thing that I haven’t heard anybody else say. Maybe others have. But the thing that is so confusing about what’s going on in the present, what’s now begun in Iran, is if I just look at it like an anthropologist. That’s a holy war. It’s a holy war, but it’s being led by secular Jews." Carlson: "Exactly." Weinstein: " And it is that secularness that cloaks it, that makes it look like something it isn’t. And I’m not saying—look, I am no fan of the Iranian theocracy, right? I couldn’t be more frightened by that structure for the same reason I don’t want to see a holy war initiated by Israel. Frankly, holy war has no place in a world where we should be moving towards the values of the modern West." Carlson: "Because it’s hard to resolve them. Very hard."

The DarkHorse Podcast

13,327 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

For decades, the global premium whisky market was dominated by brands with centuries of legacy and unmatched distribution power. Yet, an Indian single malt dared to compete on quality, craftsmanship, and innovation and won. Indri's rise proves that India is no longer just a consumer of global brands; it is becoming a creator of world-class brands that can compete with the very best on the international stage. This is what Aatmanirbhar Bharat truly means: building products in India, creating value in India, and earning recognition across the world through excellence rather than imitation. The story of Indri is not just about whisky. It is about confidence in Indian manufacturing, Indian entrepreneurship, and Indian craftsmanship. A powerful reminder that when India builds for the world, the world takes notice. From Make in India to Made for the World. #AatmanirbharBharat #MakeInIndia #Indri #IndianSingleMalt #BrandIndia #Manufacturing #Innovation #MadeInIndia #BusinessStory

For decades, the global premium whisky market was dominated by brands with centuries of legacy and unmatched distribution power. Yet, an Indian single malt dared to compete on quality, craftsmanship, and innovation and won. Indri's rise proves that India is no longer just a consumer of global brands; it is becoming a creator of world-class brands that can compete with the very best on the international stage. This is what Aatmanirbhar Bharat truly means: building products in India, creating value in India, and earning recognition across the world through excellence rather than imitation. The story of Indri is not just about whisky. It is about confidence in Indian manufacturing, Indian entrepreneurship, and Indian craftsmanship. A powerful reminder that when India builds for the world, the world takes notice. From Make in India to Made for the World. #AatmanirbharBharat #MakeInIndia #Indri #IndianSingleMalt #BrandIndia #Manufacturing #Innovation #MadeInIndia #BusinessStory

News Algebra

51,210 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 NEW: Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, discusses the definition of consciousness in AI and states that AI will generate the majority of the worlds future knowledge “In the future, maybe in a couple of years, 90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI. And that’s fine. What difference does it make to me that I’m learning from a textbook that was generated by a bunch of people I don’t know? Versus knowledge from computers that are simulating all of these things? I don’t think there’s much of a difference. We still have to fact check it and make sure it’s based on first principles, just like we do today.”

🚨 NEW: Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, discusses the definition of consciousness in AI and states that AI will generate the majority of the worlds future knowledge “In the future, maybe in a couple of years, 90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI. And that’s fine. What difference does it make to me that I’m learning from a textbook that was generated by a bunch of people I don’t know? Versus knowledge from computers that are simulating all of these things? I don’t think there’s much of a difference. We still have to fact check it and make sure it’s based on first principles, just like we do today.”

Autism Capital 🧩

47,929 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG: “In the future… maybe two or three years, 90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI.” ROGAN: “That’s crazy.” HUANG: “I know, but it’s just fine.” ROGAN: “But it’s just fine?” HUANG: “Let me tell you why.” ROGAN: “Okay.” HUANG: “It’s because, what difference does it make to me that I am learning from a textbook that was generated by a bunch of people I didn’t know, or… knowledge generated by AI computers that are assimilating all of these and resynthesizing things?” “To me, I don’t think there’s a whole lot of difference.”

NVIDIA CEO JENSEN HUANG: “In the future… maybe two or three years, 90% of the world’s knowledge will likely be generated by AI.” ROGAN: “That’s crazy.” HUANG: “I know, but it’s just fine.” ROGAN: “But it’s just fine?” HUANG: “Let me tell you why.” ROGAN: “Okay.” HUANG: “It’s because, what difference does it make to me that I am learning from a textbook that was generated by a bunch of people I didn’t know, or… knowledge generated by AI computers that are assimilating all of these and resynthesizing things?” “To me, I don’t think there’s a whole lot of difference.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

129,244 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

250709 | #ATEEZ #Hongjoong on how creative expression beyond music inspires his growth as an artist , TOKTOQ pop (voice) live (rough translation): I’m also studying design and slowly creating things on my own, step by step. I’ve said something similar before, but honestly - who knows what might happen in the distant future, right? For now, though, I’m still in the process of learning more about myself - my tastes, my design style, and how I work. And I know that if I ever do create something, our ATINYs would definitely take interest and support it. But as I continue getting to know myself, I just want to say - and I’ll say this clearly - I have absolutely no intention of starting a brand or selling anything at this point. Not even a little bit. Right now, I just see this - working and designing - as another way of expressing myself. That’s all it is. At least for now, I don’t have any plans beyond that. So I know there are people who hope I might do something more with this, and on the other hand, there may also be some fans who start to wonder, “Is he planning something?” - and maybe feel a bit uneasy about it. Because it could seem like I’m taking on too much or not focusing on my main work. But I’m very aware of that myself, and honestly, I don’t want that to happen. I really don’t. So to be clear - I’ll say it firmly - I don’t have any such plans right now. It all started simply because I wanted to try wearing clothes from different brands, and eventually, I thought, “I want to wear what I want,” or “I want to create something I’d like to wear.” That’s the situation I’m in. I just want to keep expressing myself. As long as it doesn’t become a burden for me or interfere with my schedule, I’d love to keep doing fun and creative things and share them with our ATINYs. So… it’s really just that. Since I’ve been using something like a stylized “HJ” - kind of like a personal mark - some people might start thinking, “Oh, is he launching a brand?” But absolutely not. That’s not the case at all. I’ve just been adding that mark to the clothes I make because I think it looks nice, and it kind of makes it feel like it’s mine. That’s really all there is to it. To be honest, I do want to make a tag eventually, but the design isn’t fully clear in my head yet - I haven’t figured it out. So for now, I’m just using the logo that’s in my mind. And honestly, it’s not like I’m trying to hide anything or doing something secretly behind my members’ backs. I just wanted to talk about it openly and put it out there. Because that way, I can really have fun with it. And if our ATINYs say, “Oh, that looks nice,” then I can just feel happy about it as it is. And even if I end up making something that doesn’t turn out so great sometimes, if ATINYs say, “You made that?” - even that, I can just laugh and enjoy it for what it is. So that’s what it is. That’s really the reason. Continuously creating - not just in music, but in other areas too - gives me so much energy. And I truly believe that this kind of creativity brings new inspiration to my performances as well. I think that’s what it is - the process of constantly making something new gives me another kind of drive, another kind of motivation. That’s what it feels like to me. So… that’s why I enjoy it. And honestly, that’s also why - even more so - I feel more motivated when it comes to things like choreography practice, or even just the basics of rapping. It makes me want to put in even more effort.

Irene | AhgaTiny🍋

27,502 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,913 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Tristan Thompson reveals he invested in SpaceX under a $300B valuation “For a long time what I was doing, probably 2023, I was honestly just investing in a lot of SPVs, whether it was Anthropic at a low valuation or just SpaceX under $300B” “That was honestly just because playing against the Golden State Warriors and being in SF for, what, four finals in a row and meeting people and saying hey, I want a little exposure” “I’m used to just investing in straight consumable brands and family brands like Skims, Kylie Cosmetics… all that stuff but I wanted to do something different” “The way I look at investing is it’s about where the world is going and not where the world is at” “Now being more in the space and adding the crypto layer to it I was like, I look at Magic Johnson and Shaq, guys that were at the forefront of the blueprint” “I was like who’s gonna take the bull by its horns and be that new young money athlete?”

Tristan Thompson reveals he invested in SpaceX under a $300B valuation “For a long time what I was doing, probably 2023, I was honestly just investing in a lot of SPVs, whether it was Anthropic at a low valuation or just SpaceX under $300B” “That was honestly just because playing against the Golden State Warriors and being in SF for, what, four finals in a row and meeting people and saying hey, I want a little exposure” “I’m used to just investing in straight consumable brands and family brands like Skims, Kylie Cosmetics… all that stuff but I wanted to do something different” “The way I look at investing is it’s about where the world is going and not where the world is at” “Now being more in the space and adding the crypto layer to it I was like, I look at Magic Johnson and Shaq, guys that were at the forefront of the blueprint” “I was like who’s gonna take the bull by its horns and be that new young money athlete?”

Jack

186,615 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

meghan talking for the first time about the #meghaneffect and her shopmy store. "up until then there was always speculation on what i might be wearing. and then, you'd find different media outlets would put it up with their affiliate sales and they might sell out on a shirt. but it wasn't the shirt of that female founder that i was choosing to support. and that was really interesting for me because a lot of my choices, especially when i wasn't using my voice as often, my fashion choices were decisive. and they were really designed to uplift a lot of smaller brands that people might not know about. especially female founded brands and designers. so from my standpoint, even having shop my on instagram has been a interesting exploration because i'm able to say 'these are the actual brands and people can find what they are looking for if they want to emulate the style " - meghan #TheCircuit

meghan talking for the first time about the #meghaneffect and her shopmy store. "up until then there was always speculation on what i might be wearing. and then, you'd find different media outlets would put it up with their affiliate sales and they might sell out on a shirt. but it wasn't the shirt of that female founder that i was choosing to support. and that was really interesting for me because a lot of my choices, especially when i wasn't using my voice as often, my fashion choices were decisive. and they were really designed to uplift a lot of smaller brands that people might not know about. especially female founded brands and designers. so from my standpoint, even having shop my on instagram has been a interesting exploration because i'm able to say 'these are the actual brands and people can find what they are looking for if they want to emulate the style " - meghan #TheCircuit

magali 🐼

34,026 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

Arjun Khemani

10,523 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Happy Mother’s Day! Today I visited Franciscan Monastery of the Holy Land in America with my Catholic friend Kevin to attend a Traditional Latin Mass (TLM). I’ve heard that the TLM has been growing in popularity, especially among younger people. Part of the appeal seems to be a longing for tradition, beauty, and reverence —and maybe also because people are drawn to something that feels meaningful and worth preserving, especially now that the Vatican has tried to limit it. I loved it. The liturgy was beautiful and powerful. It felt timeless and deeply moving — truly an experience to remember.

Happy Mother’s Day! Today I visited Franciscan Monastery of the Holy Land in America with my Catholic friend Kevin to attend a Traditional Latin Mass (TLM). I’ve heard that the TLM has been growing in popularity, especially among younger people. Part of the appeal seems to be a longing for tradition, beauty, and reverence —and maybe also because people are drawn to something that feels meaningful and worth preserving, especially now that the Vatican has tried to limit it. I loved it. The liturgy was beautiful and powerful. It felt timeless and deeply moving — truly an experience to remember.

Xi Van Fleet

14,961 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I apologize for sharing this video here. But if there is any official or regulatory body that you can tag here, please do, because in the name Ayurveda, autistic children are getting harrassed and hurt. Ayurveda practitioners at Shri Varkari Ayurved Chikitsalay, Alandi, Maharashtra are making false claims that they can "cure autism" by use of ancient Ayurvedic healing technique called "Viddha Karma" - a dry needle insertion technique. Their Instagram page video link: Main page: This is not only traumatic for these children, but also dangerous because it can cause wounds, infection and possible transmission of serious viral infections. Some children are also needled inside the mouth and tongue while others are pricked with sharp needles over the temple region and head claiming that this "cures autism." This is not treatment. These are criminal acts of medical negligence on children with special needs. The families would not have the education or the knowledge to understand that these children are being hurt because they are not guided by rationality, but by desperation and these quacks are taking advantage of it.

I apologize for sharing this video here. But if there is any official or regulatory body that you can tag here, please do, because in the name Ayurveda, autistic children are getting harrassed and hurt. Ayurveda practitioners at Shri Varkari Ayurved Chikitsalay, Alandi, Maharashtra are making false claims that they can "cure autism" by use of ancient Ayurvedic healing technique called "Viddha Karma" - a dry needle insertion technique. Their Instagram page video link: Main page: This is not only traumatic for these children, but also dangerous because it can cause wounds, infection and possible transmission of serious viral infections. Some children are also needled inside the mouth and tongue while others are pricked with sharp needles over the temple region and head claiming that this "cures autism." This is not treatment. These are criminal acts of medical negligence on children with special needs. The families would not have the education or the knowledge to understand that these children are being hurt because they are not guided by rationality, but by desperation and these quacks are taking advantage of it.

TheLiverDoc™

163,881 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

You are about to lose some brain cells… Theo Von now suggests that America is owned by Israel or another foreign or corporate power: “You don’t really know what’s going on… and if they would just say hey America is a country that is owned by Israel or that it’s always been just this outpost or it’s this LLC of Israel… or maybe not even of Israel it could just be of corporate entities… but if they would just tell us, then you can operate from a place of knowing what’s going on.”

You are about to lose some brain cells… Theo Von now suggests that America is owned by Israel or another foreign or corporate power: “You don’t really know what’s going on… and if they would just say hey America is a country that is owned by Israel or that it’s always been just this outpost or it’s this LLC of Israel… or maybe not even of Israel it could just be of corporate entities… but if they would just tell us, then you can operate from a place of knowing what’s going on.”

Open Source Intel

274,848 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,056 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

I really wanted to say this part clearly. Not every man in the comments is reactive or defensive. Some of you showed exactly the kind of grounded presence I want to call forward. You stayed with the message. You shared honestly. You helped other men feel seen. That matters so much because it proves something important: A foot lover does not have to be ruled by his trigger. He can enjoy beauty, remain aware, and still take in something useful. That is what maturity looks like in this space. I wanted to acknowledge that energy because it deserves to be seen too.

Sensitive content

I really wanted to say this part clearly. Not every man in the comments is reactive or defensive. Some of you showed exactly the kind of grounded presence I want to call forward. You stayed with the message. You shared honestly. You helped other men feel seen. That matters so much because it proves something important: A foot lover does not have to be ruled by his trigger. He can enjoy beauty, remain aware, and still take in something useful. That is what maturity looks like in this space. I wanted to acknowledge that energy because it deserves to be seen too.

Command Within | Build Self-Command

30,142 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

When the young generation embrace a pseudoscience like Ayurveda. There is a huge problem in India. You may not realize it, but it is an open secret. Normalizing and glorifying “healthy alcohol consumption” seems to be the biggest social media tool that young content makers are cashing in from an ill-informed public. As a clinical Hepatologist who writes off close to five death summaries of young men aged 25 to 40 years almost every week – young productive men who have died due to alcohol use disorder and liver failure, leaving behind aging parents, creating widows or fatherless children, I sometimes feel like calling it quits. Maybe it is time to leave everyone to fend for themselves, because there is a limit to which me and other physicians can help and hope to bring a change in the people against a tsunami of disinformation that is directly harming the public health. It is like the Hydra. Cut off one disinformation, two others on the same topic comes in. And then we have young men like Shashank Sharma, this Instagram content creator and possibly an Ayurveda practitioner, who has made this video called “How to consume alcohol safely" according to the ancient traditional Indian (nonsense called) Ayurveda. This one video is enough for you to realize that Ayurveda is a pseudoscience that harms. It is a destructive professional choice for women and men studying it, because it reduces intellectual capacity, kills logical thinking, and murders rationality that students acquire in high school. The Government actively promotes it, runs large public-funded colleges to teach it to students who do not get good ranks in medical entrance examinations, but are dying to have the “Dr.” title in front of their names. Even after passing the course, the majority call themselves “doctors” instead of the traditionally given title of “Vaidya.” It is a profession solely built on the foundations of insecurity and inferiority, which is why you see Ayurveda practitioners always attacking medical science and modern medicine in India. They are trained to become blinded to truth, rabid against facts and hurtful towards those who educate the public on the harms of alternative systems of medicine. The principles that guide Ayurveda and which practitioners use to diagnose and treat misled patients – namely the theory of Vata, Pita and Kapha are part of the obsolete primal pseudoscientific ‘Humoral Theory’ that was philosophical and unscientific. It was buried once scientific discoveries progressed, germ theory evolved and the study of anatomy and physiology came into being. Essentially, this theory stated that the human body was filled with three basic substances, called three humors, which are in balance when a person is healthy. All diseases and disabilities resulted from an excess or deficit of one of these four humors – namely Vata, Pita, Kapha. Can you see how stupid that sounds now? Now the video tells us that based on the “humoral disposition” there are ways to safely consume alcohol – for example, after a hot bath and after taking sweets, alcohol damage is reduced in Pita-type people. This sounds even worse than the worst nonsense you would have ever heard. There is no safe level of alcohol and no healthy or safe way of drinking it. The human body wants to remove alcohol, a known social poison, quickly and effectively, when consumed. The body has no use for alcohol. It has no nutritive value and is all empty calories which the body does not want any of it. But here is a young Ayurveda guy, telling us how to do that safely. A slow and presumed safe exercise in “killing one softly.” Whether you consume alcohol based on Vata, Pita or Kapha or not, the harms of it include liver disease, seven types of cancer, alcohol dependence syndromes, psychiatric illnesses and suicides, heart diseases, injuries, and violence and 61 other diseases that reduce life expectancy. Terrifyingly, the incidence of severe alcohol-related liver disease is increasing rapidly, especially among females and individuals of lower socioeconomic status. We fail to implement proven and effective measures to reduce alcohol harm, usually due to lobbying and interference by the alcohol industry and because we have fools like this guy on Instagram, who dabble in pseudoscience like Ayurveda, misleading public at large. We must eliminate alcohol promotion: advertising, marketing, sponsorship and now “content creation,” to protect our fellow humans from falling into this trap. So, if you could, please do me a favor. Go to this link on his Instagram page and report this nonsense video made by this Ayurveda apologist and sympathizer, so that Instagram can remove it and take it back to the stupidest Hell-hole it emanated from. And remember, do not send your children to study Ayush courses in India. You are doing a disservice to them and to this country. The best they get from that is a dummy “Dr.” title in front of their names and the worst, they get to kill public-health.

When the young generation embrace a pseudoscience like Ayurveda. There is a huge problem in India. You may not realize it, but it is an open secret. Normalizing and glorifying “healthy alcohol consumption” seems to be the biggest social media tool that young content makers are cashing in from an ill-informed public. As a clinical Hepatologist who writes off close to five death summaries of young men aged 25 to 40 years almost every week – young productive men who have died due to alcohol use disorder and liver failure, leaving behind aging parents, creating widows or fatherless children, I sometimes feel like calling it quits. Maybe it is time to leave everyone to fend for themselves, because there is a limit to which me and other physicians can help and hope to bring a change in the people against a tsunami of disinformation that is directly harming the public health. It is like the Hydra. Cut off one disinformation, two others on the same topic comes in. And then we have young men like Shashank Sharma, this Instagram content creator and possibly an Ayurveda practitioner, who has made this video called “How to consume alcohol safely" according to the ancient traditional Indian (nonsense called) Ayurveda. This one video is enough for you to realize that Ayurveda is a pseudoscience that harms. It is a destructive professional choice for women and men studying it, because it reduces intellectual capacity, kills logical thinking, and murders rationality that students acquire in high school. The Government actively promotes it, runs large public-funded colleges to teach it to students who do not get good ranks in medical entrance examinations, but are dying to have the “Dr.” title in front of their names. Even after passing the course, the majority call themselves “doctors” instead of the traditionally given title of “Vaidya.” It is a profession solely built on the foundations of insecurity and inferiority, which is why you see Ayurveda practitioners always attacking medical science and modern medicine in India. They are trained to become blinded to truth, rabid against facts and hurtful towards those who educate the public on the harms of alternative systems of medicine. The principles that guide Ayurveda and which practitioners use to diagnose and treat misled patients – namely the theory of Vata, Pita and Kapha are part of the obsolete primal pseudoscientific ‘Humoral Theory’ that was philosophical and unscientific. It was buried once scientific discoveries progressed, germ theory evolved and the study of anatomy and physiology came into being. Essentially, this theory stated that the human body was filled with three basic substances, called three humors, which are in balance when a person is healthy. All diseases and disabilities resulted from an excess or deficit of one of these four humors – namely Vata, Pita, Kapha. Can you see how stupid that sounds now? Now the video tells us that based on the “humoral disposition” there are ways to safely consume alcohol – for example, after a hot bath and after taking sweets, alcohol damage is reduced in Pita-type people. This sounds even worse than the worst nonsense you would have ever heard. There is no safe level of alcohol and no healthy or safe way of drinking it. The human body wants to remove alcohol, a known social poison, quickly and effectively, when consumed. The body has no use for alcohol. It has no nutritive value and is all empty calories which the body does not want any of it. But here is a young Ayurveda guy, telling us how to do that safely. A slow and presumed safe exercise in “killing one softly.” Whether you consume alcohol based on Vata, Pita or Kapha or not, the harms of it include liver disease, seven types of cancer, alcohol dependence syndromes, psychiatric illnesses and suicides, heart diseases, injuries, and violence and 61 other diseases that reduce life expectancy. Terrifyingly, the incidence of severe alcohol-related liver disease is increasing rapidly, especially among females and individuals of lower socioeconomic status. We fail to implement proven and effective measures to reduce alcohol harm, usually due to lobbying and interference by the alcohol industry and because we have fools like this guy on Instagram, who dabble in pseudoscience like Ayurveda, misleading public at large. We must eliminate alcohol promotion: advertising, marketing, sponsorship and now “content creation,” to protect our fellow humans from falling into this trap. So, if you could, please do me a favor. Go to this link on his Instagram page and report this nonsense video made by this Ayurveda apologist and sympathizer, so that Instagram can remove it and take it back to the stupidest Hell-hole it emanated from. And remember, do not send your children to study Ayush courses in India. You are doing a disservice to them and to this country. The best they get from that is a dummy “Dr.” title in front of their names and the worst, they get to kill public-health.

TheLiverDoc™

255,802 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Around 1 billion computer-based jobs are at risk of being replaced by AI. This shift is happening whether people are ready for it or not. The real question isn’t if it happens. It’s who owns the value created by it. Right now, that value flows to a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. At Action Model, we believe AI should be owned by the people, not controlled by the few. There’s still a small window for people-owned AI to win. Now is your chance to do something about it.

Around 1 billion computer-based jobs are at risk of being replaced by AI. This shift is happening whether people are ready for it or not. The real question isn’t if it happens. It’s who owns the value created by it. Right now, that value flows to a handful of billionaires and Big Tech companies. At Action Model, we believe AI should be owned by the people, not controlled by the few. There’s still a small window for people-owned AI to win. Now is your chance to do something about it.

Action Model

22,062 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

This couple is having a wedding that will reflect who they are. They openly don’t seem to care if anyone will actually go or not. I think weddings are a celebration for everyone to join in for a special day. But I also think that offending guests before they even go might be a decision that will turn in a decision full of regret. So here’s my take on this. The way I see it is that they are going to be disappointed. I know others might argue and say that it’s selfish for the guests to not go because of the conditions set forth by the bride and groom, however it goes both ways. If they know guests won’t like the conditions of the wedding, then maybe they should compromise a little. I think they should give people options. I feel that this is going to show the bride and groom who is actually their real friends and who aren’t in their eyes. They won’t care if the guests don’t like the wedding rules, they are going to expect them to go because they think that their attendance shows that they care and that they are local.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

300,595 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat