正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

I pointed during the campaign that the relentless attacks on Brookfield Asset Management, a Canadian business success story, were absurd. BAM hasn't been charged with breaking any rules, only of doing what countless global firms do: using legal tax havens. We're lucky to have a firm like BAM in...

69,119 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Mark Carney lied and he keeps digging! Listen to this word salad. I don’t think it answers why he lied. Check it out. What do you think? Q: You said you weren't the chair anymore when the decision was made, but it was made back in fall, and you wrote a letter about it. How can you square that? CARNEY: Look, there's several elements to the transaction and I should have been more precise in my answer. There's an overall move with a plan of arrangement, and the plan of arrangement and the agreement of all that, which is also true, it's complicated. The corporation and the company, which happened after us was. I think the core though, is, what are we actually talking about? We're talking about the technical change to where the head office is. No difference to any employment. The technical change, no difference to any employment here in Canada, no difference to any of the operations here in Canada. And in fact, on net, what the technical change does is improves the access to capital. Q: It makes you look like you're trying to distance yourself from moving headquarters from Canada to the United States. Why would you do that? CARNEY: As I say, it's a technical change. It enhances the liquidity. Brookfield is a great Canadian company. It's a great Canadian success story. If you look at the company still listed on Toronto, the employees all still here, I would say a number of the employees actually live here in Oakville and, you know, having greater access to capital is a good thing for Canada, good thing for Canadian growth. Q: You've been accused of lying. Did you lie, sir. You said you should have been more precise. CARNEY: There's multiple aspects. Ok some of my - sometimes I answer questions that go into details when I should keep it at a higher level. That's part of the problem with not being a politician.

Chris Warkentin

53,944 次观看 • 1 年前

EXCLUSIVE: I went to Bermuda to find the money Mark Carney hid from the CRA Until a few weeks ago, Mark Carney was the chairman of Brookfield Asset Management, a massive corporation that manages more than a trillion dollars. It truly spans the globe — just like Carney himself, who has three passports and was a board member of the World Economic Forum. Carney is our prime minister now, though Canadians hardly know him. But one thing is becoming clear: he went to great lengths to make sure Brookfield paid as little tax in Canada as possible. Carney personally led two massive Brookfield investments into green energy, totalling $25 billion. But he didn't headquarter that company in Canada, or the U.S., or anywhere they were actually building solar panels or wind turbines. No, he headquartered them in Bermuda — at 73 Front Street, the same address as a bike rental shop. What's going on there? Well, I decided to fly down and go to that bike shop and ask, and we've made a short documentary about it. As you can see, the Bermuda address is just a shell company, a front. Or as a child would say, a lie. According to legend, the Bermuda Triangle is a place where ships and even airplanes disappear. I don't know about that, but Bermuda is definitely a place where oligarchs like Carney make billions of dollars disappear, to evade the Canada Revenue Agency and other tax collectors. They're being sued right now by the CRA for breaking the law. But even if they're right — even if they've found a way to game the system, legally — is that ethical conduct from the man who has become our prime minister? The only thing more gross than that, is how easily Carney has been able to pay off the regime media, including a $150 million election bribe to the CBC state broadcaster. You can believe that if it were Pierre Poilievre stashing money in a tax haven, the CBC would be camped out at the bike shop around the clock. Why does Carney still refuse to sell his Brookfield stock? When was the last time he spoke with Brookfield? Will Brookfield continue to get huge contracts from the Canadian government? Will Carney shut down the CRA’s lawsuit against Brookfield? Good questions — but not ones you’ll ever hear the CBC ask. I promise, we’ll keep at it, though. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

292,620 次观看 • 1 年前

A lot of words to say: I lied. Check this out 👇 Q: You said you weren't the chair anymore when the decision was made, but it was made back in fall, and you wrote a letter about it. How can you square that? CARNEY: Look, there's several elements to the transaction and I should have been more precise in my answer. There's an overall move with a plan of arrangement, and the plan of arrangement and the agreement of all that, which is also true, it's complicated. The corporation and the company, which happened after us was. I think the core though, is, what are we actually talking about? We're talking about the technical change to where the head office is. No difference to any employment. The technical change, no difference to any employment here in Canada, no difference to any of the operations here in Canada. And in fact, on net, what the technical change does is improves the access to capital. Q: It makes you look like you're trying to distance yourself from moving headquarters from Canada to the United States. Why would you do that? CARNEY: As I say, it's a technical change. It enhances the liquidity. Brookfield is a great Canadian company. It's a great Canadian success story. If you look at the company still listed on Toronto, the employees all still here, I would say a number of the employees actually live here in Oakville and, you know, having greater access to capital is a good thing for Canada, good thing for Canadian growth. Q: You've been accused of lying. Did you lie, sir. You said you should have been more precise. CARNEY: There's multiple aspects. Ok some of my - sometimes I answer questions that go into details when I should keep it at a higher level. That's part of the problem with not being a politician.

Melissa Lantsman

108,587 次观看 • 1 年前