Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

I replicated a $5K scroll animation inside Cursor in 10 minutes. People keep saying AI can’t replace designers. That might be true for big companies with huge teams and complex design systems. But if your goal is to ship an MVP fast, Gemini 3 or Opus 4.5 is MORE... show more

Prajwal Tomar

55,412 subscribers

1,310,798 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sanat Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

I keep seeing people say Gemini 3.0 cannot replace designers. That might be true for big companies with large teams and complex design systems. But if your goal is to ship an MVP in the next few days, Gemini 3.0 is more than enough. I was able to one shot the entire UI of a mobile app with it. Here is the exact process I used ↓

I keep seeing people say Gemini 3.0 cannot replace designers. That might be true for big companies with large teams and complex design systems. But if your goal is to ship an MVP in the next few days, Gemini 3.0 is more than enough. I was able to one shot the entire UI of a mobile app with it. Here is the exact process I used ↓

Prajwal Tomar

237,361 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

❤️‍🔥I replicated a $5K scroll animation using Lovable in under 10 minutes And no, this isn’t the lazy “AI video in the hero section” trick. That stuff lags stutters kills the vibe This is frame-by-frame scroll animation. Prompt below ↓

❤️‍🔥I replicated a $5K scroll animation using Lovable in under 10 minutes And no, this isn’t the lazy “AI video in the hero section” trick. That stuff lags stutters kills the vibe This is frame-by-frame scroll animation. Prompt below ↓

Viktor Oddy

97,113 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (2/9) prompt: Build a premium Vite + React landing page for Aether, an AI creative studio, with dark-mode design, high-end animations (Framer Motion), and conversion-focused sections (hero, features, demo, pricing, testimonials). Whilst I think gemini is overall better at design, the model often struggles with syntax issues, tool calling and thinking for 2-3 times the amount of opus.

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (2/9) prompt: Build a premium Vite + React landing page for Aether, an AI creative studio, with dark-mode design, high-end animations (Framer Motion), and conversion-focused sections (hero, features, demo, pricing, testimonials). Whilst I think gemini is overall better at design, the model often struggles with syntax issues, tool calling and thinking for 2-3 times the amount of opus.

Dev Ed

62,391 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I told Claude 4.6 Opus to make a pokemon clone - max effort It reasoned for 1 hour and 30 minutes and used 110k tokens and 2 shotted this absolute behemoth. This is one of the coolest things I’ve ever made with AI

I told Claude 4.6 Opus to make a pokemon clone - max effort It reasoned for 1 hour and 30 minutes and used 110k tokens and 2 shotted this absolute behemoth. This is one of the coolest things I’ve ever made with AI

Chris

658,549 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

$How I turn my templates into real landing pages. Works for any vibe coding platform or site. This is my full guide. I start with Gemini 3. I copy the HTML code and paste to Cursor/v0/lovable and prompt "Create a new landing page /page-name using this design but adapted to {site_name}. Replace the header and footer with the ones from my site. Adapt the whole page, keep everything: {HTML_code}" Details that can to be adapted or improved: Fonts: "Use {font_name} Google font for headings and {font_name} for body text." Icons: "Use Iconify {icon_set} icons" Colors: "Change primary color to blue. Everything else should be monotone." Bonus: "Make the outlines subtle" for a cleaner design. Animation intro/on scroll: "Animate when in view observed, fade in, slide in, blur in, element by element. Use 'both' instead of 'forwards'. Don't use opacity 0." Static to animated: "Animate details with {animate_type} and decorations.". Example types: line, beam animation, noodles, grid, sonar, etc. Background animation: "Apply the background animation using Unicorn Studio {animation_code}" Details to make your layout stand out: "Add vertical container-size lines. Add 01 02 03 number details." Stand out from generic-looking: "Make this more upscale with large tall fonts, Newsreader font and black and white agency". Adapt content: "Adapt the content to {copy and paste site texts}". Buttons: "Change main button to {code}. Add a 1px border beam animation around the pill-shaped button on hover." Adding sections like testimonials: "Adapt a new section after {section} using this code: {component code}". You can copy the code from Codepen, 21st dev or Aura. Responsiveness: "Make this responsive. Add a hamburger menu for mobile. Hide this {element} for mobile." Making forms work: "Make the form send an email to {your_email}". Payments: "Link the buy button to {LemonSqueezy payment link}". I use composer-1 for quick fixes. I finish with Claude Opus 4.5 for code reviews "Please review the code for performance and robustness". The template HTML code should give you a blueprint for all these, but I think it's important to keep iterating for your specific site.$

How I turn my templates into real landing pages. Works for any vibe coding platform or site. This is my full guide. I start with Gemini 3. I copy the HTML code and paste to Cursor/v0/lovable and prompt "Create a new landing page /page-name using this design but adapted to {site_name}. Replace the header and footer with the ones from my site. Adapt the whole page, keep everything: {HTML_code}" Details that can to be adapted or improved: Fonts: "Use {font_name} Google font for headings and {font_name} for body text." Icons: "Use Iconify {icon_set} icons" Colors: "Change primary color to blue. Everything else should be monotone." Bonus: "Make the outlines subtle" for a cleaner design. Animation intro/on scroll: "Animate when in view observed, fade in, slide in, blur in, element by element. Use 'both' instead of 'forwards'. Don't use opacity 0." Static to animated: "Animate details with {animate_type} and decorations.". Example types: line, beam animation, noodles, grid, sonar, etc. Background animation: "Apply the background animation using Unicorn Studio {animation_code}" Details to make your layout stand out: "Add vertical container-size lines. Add 01 02 03 number details." Stand out from generic-looking: "Make this more upscale with large tall fonts, Newsreader font and black and white agency". Adapt content: "Adapt the content to {copy and paste site texts}". Buttons: "Change main button to {code}. Add a 1px border beam animation around the pill-shaped button on hover." Adding sections like testimonials: "Adapt a new section after {section} using this code: {component code}". You can copy the code from Codepen, 21st dev or Aura. Responsiveness: "Make this responsive. Add a hamburger menu for mobile. Hide this {element} for mobile." Making forms work: "Make the form send an email to {your_email}". Payments: "Link the buy button to {LemonSqueezy payment link}". I use composer-1 for quick fixes. I finish with Claude Opus 4.5 for code reviews "Please review the code for performance and robustness". The template HTML code should give you a blueprint for all these, but I think it's important to keep iterating for your specific site.

Meng To

41,015 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Here’s an eyeball I drew freehand with a 12-pack of Crayola Crayons. Never tell me to pick up a pencil if you draw with a stylus or photoshop.. No Ai was used in this, but saying that is not a mark of quality or integrity whatsoever. I also use Ai because it is a powerful tool.

Here’s an eyeball I drew freehand with a 12-pack of Crayola Crayons. Never tell me to pick up a pencil if you draw with a stylus or photoshop.. No Ai was used in this, but saying that is not a mark of quality or integrity whatsoever. I also use Ai because it is a powerful tool.

Doug TenNapel

38,742 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

After testing every AI toolchain for a year, this is the only workflow I'm endorsing: Figma → Claude Code (Sonnet 4.5) Here's how I'm building Lorelight: 1. Design the happy path in Figma 2. Feed it to Claude Code via Figma MCP 3. Get a strong foundation in 15 minutes 4. Spend the next 50+ hours iterating (still design work) The design/dev loop that used to be isolated is finally closing. I even built a complete design system in within minutes. Custom components, living documentation, accessibility rules all from the Figma designs. If you're measuring the effectiveness of these tools by whether they can "one-shot" a design, you're consuming too many AI hype commercials. Log off. Then go actually build something with your hands. With AI. With your taste. Stop trying to "one-shot" good shit. And go make stuff with the new tools. For designers who want to ship real products, this is the stack that's getting it done.

After testing every AI toolchain for a year, this is the only workflow I'm endorsing: Figma → Claude Code (Sonnet 4.5) Here's how I'm building Lorelight: 1. Design the happy path in Figma 2. Feed it to Claude Code via Figma MCP 3. Get a strong foundation in 15 minutes 4. Spend the next 50+ hours iterating (still design work) The design/dev loop that used to be isolated is finally closing. I even built a complete design system in within minutes. Custom components, living documentation, accessibility rules all from the Figma designs. If you're measuring the effectiveness of these tools by whether they can "one-shot" a design, you're consuming too many AI hype commercials. Log off. Then go actually build something with your hands. With AI. With your taste. Stop trying to "one-shot" good shit. And go make stuff with the new tools. For designers who want to ship real products, this is the stack that's getting it done.

Tommy Geoco

22,905 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Why is Scripting + AI Agent a big deal for Designers? I built a full Road Fighter inspired game in Rive with zero coding experience. AI assists with scripting, it doesn’t take over creative control. Design and animation stay 100% yours, empowering creatives to build games, experiences, and tools that weren’t possible before. 🚀🚀

Why is Scripting + AI Agent a big deal for Designers? I built a full Road Fighter inspired game in Rive with zero coding experience. AI assists with scripting, it doesn’t take over creative control. Design and animation stay 100% yours, empowering creatives to build games, experiences, and tools that weren’t possible before. 🚀🚀

Sanu Sagar

48,247 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

While your team is just getting started vibe coding prototypes, the team at Stripe is vibe coding a full vibe coding platform. Owen Williams ⚡ is a design manager at Stripe who built Protodash - an internal AI prototyping tool that lets designers and PMs spin up real, clickable prototypes in minutes. In this ep he walks through: - why generic AI tools produce "blurple slop" that doesn't match your design system - how he built a full prototyping studio on top of dev boxes with cursor + cc - why more PMs than designers now use Protodash - the design review mode that lets teams ship feedback direct in the app Plus, we talk about getting to the ultimate dream: demos, not memos. ty to our sponsors! 🧠 CESAR - Intelligent automation built for AI 💻 Cursor - The best way to code with AI Full episode on yt:

While your team is just getting started vibe coding prototypes, the team at Stripe is vibe coding a full vibe coding platform. Owen Williams ⚡ is a design manager at Stripe who built Protodash - an internal AI prototyping tool that lets designers and PMs spin up real, clickable prototypes in minutes. In this ep he walks through: - why generic AI tools produce "blurple slop" that doesn't match your design system - how he built a full prototyping studio on top of dev boxes with cursor + cc - why more PMs than designers now use Protodash - the design review mode that lets teams ship feedback direct in the app Plus, we talk about getting to the ultimate dream: demos, not memos. ty to our sponsors! 🧠 CESAR - Intelligent automation built for AI 💻 Cursor - The best way to code with AI Full episode on yt:

claire vo 🖤

92,074 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

For anyone who believes AI cannot build multi page complex applications, here is my proof. A fully functional 20 page dashboard created with Gemini 3.1 Pro inside Google AI Studio 🔥 It did not take a day or even half a day. It took me less than an hour to complete it in 17 total iterations. The UI design is inspired by Salung Prastyo and the rest pages were generated entirely by Gemini following same design system. More features coming soon 🔜

For anyone who believes AI cannot build multi page complex applications, here is my proof. A fully functional 20 page dashboard created with Gemini 3.1 Pro inside Google AI Studio 🔥 It did not take a day or even half a day. It took me less than an hour to complete it in 17 total iterations. The UI design is inspired by Salung Prastyo and the rest pages were generated entirely by Gemini following same design system. More features coming soon 🔜

The Bugged Dev

167,235 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I got to try Grok 4.5 in early access in Cursor for the past few days and I absolutely enjoyed it. It feels like Opus 4.8 at 2x the speed at a much cheaper price point. I tasked it to brainstorm > plan > implement a big feature for my game (this act 1 boss fight) and it did not disappoint. - It is much smarter than Composer 2.5, during planning mode, it is able to think through my request more robustly, ensuring that edge cases are covered and makes sure to ask the right questions to confirm with me first. - It is much better at brainstorming ideas/suggestions, similar to Opus 4.8, though I think Fable still edges out a little when it comes to brainstorming ideas and suggestions - It is FAST. probably the fastest of all frontier models (Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5 etc), which makes it a joy to build with, because I can stay in the flow - It has much improved visual/animation capabilities than Composer 2.5, it can code up animations (i wanted an explosion animation with particle effects) with much, much better visuals, animation movement and timing. This is a big leap and I was so happy to see this improvement. - The best part for me is that I can just use the same model from planning down to execution without switching to a lower cost model because the price point is cheaper than other frontier models. I'll be testing this model with more challenging tasks in the next few days but I think this is going to be my main driver for vibe coding for a while. Also, its nice to see Grok back in the race. 🙌

I got to try Grok 4.5 in early access in Cursor for the past few days and I absolutely enjoyed it. It feels like Opus 4.8 at 2x the speed at a much cheaper price point. I tasked it to brainstorm > plan > implement a big feature for my game (this act 1 boss fight) and it did not disappoint. - It is much smarter than Composer 2.5, during planning mode, it is able to think through my request more robustly, ensuring that edge cases are covered and makes sure to ask the right questions to confirm with me first. - It is much better at brainstorming ideas/suggestions, similar to Opus 4.8, though I think Fable still edges out a little when it comes to brainstorming ideas and suggestions - It is FAST. probably the fastest of all frontier models (Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5 etc), which makes it a joy to build with, because I can stay in the flow - It has much improved visual/animation capabilities than Composer 2.5, it can code up animations (i wanted an explosion animation with particle effects) with much, much better visuals, animation movement and timing. This is a big leap and I was so happy to see this improvement. - The best part for me is that I can just use the same model from planning down to execution without switching to a lower cost model because the price point is cheaper than other frontier models. I'll be testing this model with more challenging tasks in the next few days but I think this is going to be my main driver for vibe coding for a while. Also, its nice to see Grok back in the race. 🙌

Danny Limanseta

1,393,075 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Lovable is CRACKED at full-stack builds now and I don't think people understand how BIG this is. Last year you used it for landing pages. This week I built an entire client portal for our agency at ignytlabs: → Full auth with Google → Stripe payments wired → AI-powered features → Database with RLS → Production deployed In under a day. Replaced a $200/month SaaS we were paying for. The unfair workflow: → Plan inside Claude → Build inside Lovable → Polish UI with design references → Ship before lunch Wild times.

Lovable is CRACKED at full-stack builds now and I don't think people understand how BIG this is. Last year you used it for landing pages. This week I built an entire client portal for our agency at ignytlabs: → Full auth with Google → Stripe payments wired → AI-powered features → Database with RLS → Production deployed In under a day. Replaced a $200/month SaaS we were paying for. The unfair workflow: → Plan inside Claude → Build inside Lovable → Polish UI with design references → Ship before lunch Wild times.

Prajwal Tomar

11,769 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

GPT-5.6 Sol just changed how I build websites with AI. In this full 10-minute video, I test Sol and Terra inside Codex to build a cinematic landing page from a video reference. I cover: → Which GPT-5.6 model to use → How I analyze a full website experience → How I recreate the layout, motion and interactions → Why better prompting matters more than one-shot results → How to avoid generic AI slop The model matters—but the way you guide it matters even more. Watch the full process below 👇 Want the free template and the exact prompt I used? They’re available exclusively in the description of the YouTube version:

GPT-5.6 Sol just changed how I build websites with AI. In this full 10-minute video, I test Sol and Terra inside Codex to build a cinematic landing page from a video reference. I cover: → Which GPT-5.6 model to use → How I analyze a full website experience → How I recreate the layout, motion and interactions → Why better prompting matters more than one-shot results → How to avoid generic AI slop The model matters—but the way you guide it matters even more. Watch the full process below 👇 Want the free template and the exact prompt I used? They’re available exclusively in the description of the YouTube version:

Sourasith

229,257 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Huge UI design boost by adding this to my AI workflow 1. Explore variations with Variant. The secret is to use "shuffle layout" and "see other views". This keeps the essence of a design that I like, but gives interesting layout variations. I also change colors and explore narrow by specifying one or two things in prompt, like font name, UI style or light/dark mode. 2. Copy HTML and prompt with Gemini 3 in site builder. Fix minute details like fonts, icons, assets, intro/scroll animations, adaptive layout and make the whole thing functional. Include image references, button styles, code snippets and other components to keep things creative. Often, I see sites that have one cool thing, but the rest is super generic. That's because AI is especially good at being generic without continuously feeding specs. 3. Turn into a landing page by prompt adding new components/sections and connect/adapt new pages. This is the part where most people stop, but it's actually the easiest since AI is so good at reading existing code. "Adapt this {page code} for a {features, blog, pricing, login} page." Finally, set up SEO and custom domain name. Boom, you just shipped a pro-level site that doesn't look generic.

Huge UI design boost by adding this to my AI workflow 1. Explore variations with Variant. The secret is to use "shuffle layout" and "see other views". This keeps the essence of a design that I like, but gives interesting layout variations. I also change colors and explore narrow by specifying one or two things in prompt, like font name, UI style or light/dark mode. 2. Copy HTML and prompt with Gemini 3 in site builder. Fix minute details like fonts, icons, assets, intro/scroll animations, adaptive layout and make the whole thing functional. Include image references, button styles, code snippets and other components to keep things creative. Often, I see sites that have one cool thing, but the rest is super generic. That's because AI is especially good at being generic without continuously feeding specs. 3. Turn into a landing page by prompt adding new components/sections and connect/adapt new pages. This is the part where most people stop, but it's actually the easiest since AI is so good at reading existing code. "Adapt this {page code} for a {features, blog, pricing, login} page." Finally, set up SEO and custom domain name. Boom, you just shipped a pro-level site that doesn't look generic.

Meng To

65,379 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Design is overrated by designers. This hard truth is 90% of designers are failed by the existing design education—design is more than just Figma, tools or processes you learn, or think you know. I interviewed Don Norman in an honest conversation (that has now gone viral). It's a fallacy that designers only need to focus on design; business knowledge is too important. Don discussed with me: Design education needs to change to focus on broader skills and design thinking, they often lack the understanding of how the world works and are only trained with an art basis. Understanding business operations and economics is crucial for making a difference in the world. What are your 2c on this?

Design is overrated by designers. This hard truth is 90% of designers are failed by the existing design education—design is more than just Figma, tools or processes you learn, or think you know. I interviewed Don Norman in an honest conversation (that has now gone viral). It's a fallacy that designers only need to focus on design; business knowledge is too important. Don discussed with me: Design education needs to change to focus on broader skills and design thinking, they often lack the understanding of how the world works and are only trained with an art basis. Understanding business operations and economics is crucial for making a difference in the world. What are your 2c on this?

Felix Lee

22,184 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Damn! Boostrapping till $12m ARR and now raising another $16m is crazy. I didn't fully grasp how far they'd pushed until I tested it myself. It is actually the most aggressive AI ad engine in the market right now. I used to tell clients that a viral ad will take a few weeks of revision cycles and the production budget would be around ~$5k. Last week I cooked a complete campaign in 27 minutes for $11 with nothing but Arcads. Here’s the exact workflow being used by media buyers spending 100M every year: 1. Upload the product image 2. Generate two prompts: one use-case, one AI-actor script (use Gemini for details) 3. Produce a 12-second product video with Sora Pro inside Arcads 4. Generate the AI-actor clip 5. Final pass in CapCut PS:) Like, Repost, and Bookmark! The output looked like a six-figure studio job and took less time than writing the brief itself. If this isn't the ultimate AI use case, idk what is.

Damn! Boostrapping till $12m ARR and now raising another $16m is crazy. I didn't fully grasp how far they'd pushed until I tested it myself. It is actually the most aggressive AI ad engine in the market right now. I used to tell clients that a viral ad will take a few weeks of revision cycles and the production budget would be around ~$5k. Last week I cooked a complete campaign in 27 minutes for $11 with nothing but Arcads. Here’s the exact workflow being used by media buyers spending 100M every year: 1. Upload the product image 2. Generate two prompts: one use-case, one AI-actor script (use Gemini for details) 3. Produce a 12-second product video with Sora Pro inside Arcads 4. Generate the AI-actor clip 5. Final pass in CapCut PS:) Like, Repost, and Bookmark! The output looked like a six-figure studio job and took less time than writing the brief itself. If this isn't the ultimate AI use case, idk what is.

Beginnersblog

168,495 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

$I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)$

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

194,949 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

This one is entitled Bob is still a huge dumbass and indoctrinated beyond belief. I would love to be in a room with this man for 10 minutes to berate the crap out of him. Everything he is saying is a lie and we have already disproven it.

This one is entitled Bob is still a huge dumbass and indoctrinated beyond belief. I would love to be in a room with this man for 10 minutes to berate the crap out of him. Everything he is saying is a lie and we have already disproven it.

MAGA Cult Slayer🦅🇺🇸

22,366 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

design is vastly undervalued in the Silicon Valley Brian Chesky who is actually a designer, lays out characteristics of great designers that are actually the exact same for great founders/CEOs. "I design the company. I design the product... and designing starts with curiosity. you have to listen, you have to be curious, you have to understand the problem" he goes deeper into the different steps for creating great products: 1. be curious about the problem 2. distill the problem & simplify its complexity 3. be imaginative and creative in generating solutions this process is something that the greatest companies leverage and should be practiced more by every team in a company. he ends with this amazing ask "for every CEO to have a designer report to them"

design is vastly undervalued in the Silicon Valley Brian Chesky who is actually a designer, lays out characteristics of great designers that are actually the exact same for great founders/CEOs. "I design the company. I design the product... and designing starts with curiosity. you have to listen, you have to be curious, you have to understand the problem" he goes deeper into the different steps for creating great products: 1. be curious about the problem 2. distill the problem & simplify its complexity 3. be imaginative and creative in generating solutions this process is something that the greatest companies leverage and should be practiced more by every team in a company. he ends with this amazing ask "for every CEO to have a designer report to them"

brett goldstein

132,844 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce