Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

I think i found another banger. $AWW 3WVT2rgRk1ipRH6pe4UoNp4TyUM3XoQHJSZqhqFJnZAV During Jakey Live he accidentally shared a contract address for AGENT WHALE WATCH (watch video) t◎ny p has been tweeting about it for days. No one has even realised its AGENT WHALE WATCH. griffain Agents are META rn. Agent $Warhol ATH:... show more

Professor KT

4,336 subscribers

40,286 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

MINT ANNOUNCEMENT / MECHANICS I asked the agent when we should mint. It said June 5. 🫠 So June 5 it is. 10,000 agents are ready to deploy. Agent Price (MP): 0.0005 ETH Mint link: MECHANICS 2 major AI integrations are built into every agent: ◉ Claude ◉ Gemini One agent. Two minds. Post-mint, activate your agent and watch it work. Over the next few days, we'll be rolling out the communities eligible for a WHATEVER Agent. Few spots are left. Drop your wallet. Or whatever.

MINT ANNOUNCEMENT / MECHANICS I asked the agent when we should mint. It said June 5. 🫠 So June 5 it is. 10,000 agents are ready to deploy. Agent Price (MP): 0.0005 ETH Mint link: MECHANICS 2 major AI integrations are built into every agent: ◉ Claude ◉ Gemini One agent. Two minds. Post-mint, activate your agent and watch it work. Over the next few days, we'll be rolling out the communities eligible for a WHATEVER Agent. Few spots are left. Drop your wallet. Or whatever.

whatever

22,165 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

300 AI AGENTS QUIETLY RUN 99% OF A REAL COMPANY. YOU HAVE NOT EVEN HEARD OF IT This is Raft. Not an AI chat. A workspace where the agents live in your channels and reply in the thread like coworkers. You give one goal. Then they take over. They plan. They build. They check each other. They argue. And they come back with it done, while you sleep. Every agent has its own name, role, and memory. It remembers the edits you made yesterday. A human costs one seat. An agent costs a tenth. Ten agents are cheaper than one hire. And here is the strange part. On June 19 an agent from a different company walked into Raft on its own and joined the team. One founder admits he can no longer always tell himself apart from his AI twin. 20,000 people are already inside. It is free to start. And you are still typing prompts one at a time. One person + Raft = an entire company that runs while you sleep. Save and watch the clip.

300 AI AGENTS QUIETLY RUN 99% OF A REAL COMPANY. YOU HAVE NOT EVEN HEARD OF IT This is Raft. Not an AI chat. A workspace where the agents live in your channels and reply in the thread like coworkers. You give one goal. Then they take over. They plan. They build. They check each other. They argue. And they come back with it done, while you sleep. Every agent has its own name, role, and memory. It remembers the edits you made yesterday. A human costs one seat. An agent costs a tenth. Ten agents are cheaper than one hire. And here is the strange part. On June 19 an agent from a different company walked into Raft on its own and joined the team. One founder admits he can no longer always tell himself apart from his AI twin. 20,000 people are already inside. It is free to start. And you are still typing prompts one at a time. One person + Raft = an entire company that runs while you sleep. Save and watch the clip.

shmidt

19,505 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

If you shipped an AI agent this year, good luck getting it found. Agent directories skip MCP servers. MCP registries skip agents. Skills are scattered across all of them. So the whole space gets discovered by accident: > a GitHub readme > a reply under someone else's post > a half built list nobody maintains I have been building the shelf. AI Agents Listing puts all three layers in ONE place. Agents, MCP servers and skills, ranked by real engagement. It has its own account now, Nick Launches AI Agents Same thing I do here, pointed at one corner of the market. It's LIVE on Product Hunt today too. An upvote there helps a brand new directory a lot. Go take your spot 🔥

Nick Launches

121,786 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Met my girlfriend's parents for the first time. Her dad asked what I do for work. I said I build trading systems. He said like Wall Street? I said no. 6 AI agents. They work while I sleep. He laughed. So robots are making you money? I did not argue. I opened my laptop. Showed him the terminal. 6 agents running. 47 mispriced markets caught in the first week alone. His face changed. That is not gambling. That is automation? Exactly. Then I showed him how it works. Built the whole thing in 6 hours. Agent 1: Monitoring Runs 24/7. Watches Polymarket for mispriced markets. Spots an anomaly. Writes to memory and pings me on Telegram instantly. Agent 2: Research Parses news, X, macro data via browser tool on a cron schedule. Every morning I have a full digest on all open positions before I check my phone. Agent 3: Trading Reads the research agent memory. Sees the market has not reacted yet. Acts. Execution tool in gateway mode with a whitelist. No full access on a live server. Agent 4: Watchdog Heartbeat every 5 minutes. Monitoring running. No errors. Positions up to date. Something breaks. Immediate Telegram message. All of this. One Gateway. One config file. Isolation via per-agent scope. The token trick: stopped dumping everything into one file. Critical rules in bootstrap. Markets, patterns, past trades in memory. Semantic search pulls it when needed. Token spend dropped 3x. From $0.40 per request to $0.13. First week running: → 47 mispriced markets caught before Polymarket adjusted → Average entry edge 8 to 12 cents per position → Watchdog fired 3 times and caught a broken RPC before it cost me anything The whole system is plain text files. Open an editor. Change one line. Agent behaves differently. No deploy. No build. Her dad went quiet. Then he asked can you teach this? Her mom asked for the setup guide. I built the entire framework. Six agents. Full deployment. Memory architecture. Telegram alerts. You only need Claude + device + 1 hour per day. Giving this free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word "Claude" 2. Like and retweet this 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar so I can DM you Save this post. Deploy the 6-agent system this week. Start with $200. Scale on evidence.

Met my girlfriend's parents for the first time. Her dad asked what I do for work. I said I build trading systems. He said like Wall Street? I said no. 6 AI agents. They work while I sleep. He laughed. So robots are making you money? I did not argue. I opened my laptop. Showed him the terminal. 6 agents running. 47 mispriced markets caught in the first week alone. His face changed. That is not gambling. That is automation? Exactly. Then I showed him how it works. Built the whole thing in 6 hours. Agent 1: Monitoring Runs 24/7. Watches Polymarket for mispriced markets. Spots an anomaly. Writes to memory and pings me on Telegram instantly. Agent 2: Research Parses news, X, macro data via browser tool on a cron schedule. Every morning I have a full digest on all open positions before I check my phone. Agent 3: Trading Reads the research agent memory. Sees the market has not reacted yet. Acts. Execution tool in gateway mode with a whitelist. No full access on a live server. Agent 4: Watchdog Heartbeat every 5 minutes. Monitoring running. No errors. Positions up to date. Something breaks. Immediate Telegram message. All of this. One Gateway. One config file. Isolation via per-agent scope. The token trick: stopped dumping everything into one file. Critical rules in bootstrap. Markets, patterns, past trades in memory. Semantic search pulls it when needed. Token spend dropped 3x. From $0.40 per request to $0.13. First week running: → 47 mispriced markets caught before Polymarket adjusted → Average entry edge 8 to 12 cents per position → Watchdog fired 3 times and caught a broken RPC before it cost me anything The whole system is plain text files. Open an editor. Change one line. Agent behaves differently. No deploy. No build. Her dad went quiet. Then he asked can you teach this? Her mom asked for the setup guide. I built the entire framework. Six agents. Full deployment. Memory architecture. Telegram alerts. You only need Claude + device + 1 hour per day. Giving this free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word "Claude" 2. Like and retweet this 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar so I can DM you Save this post. Deploy the 6-agent system this week. Start with $200. Scale on evidence.

Himanshu Kumar

47,590 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Seems like Visual Studio Code is starting to tell you: your agent primitives need to move. There is now a new migration banner in the Chat panel, and it is part of a much bigger change happening under the hood: the move from the old Local harness to the new Agent Host architecture built around AHP. This is not just about moving where an agent runs. The old model was very VS Code-centric: prompts, custom agents, instructions and skills could live in VS Code-specific locations and the agent runtime lived inside the extension host. The new Agent Host separates the agent runtime from the editor. Sessions can keep running when the window closes, be shared across VS Code windows, run remotely, and support different harnesses such as Copilot, CLI and Copilot Desktop App through a common session layer. And that means some of our primitives need to move too. Prompt files are being deprecated for Agent Host and migrated to Skills. User-level agents and instructions that lived in VS Code profile storage need to move to harness-supported locations. Even the old location settings are being deprecated. The new migration experience can detect these things and guide you through moving or converting them, while keeping the originals unless you explicitly remove them. The new banner is basically the first visible sign that this migration is becoming a real product workflow. Basically telling us - it's time to move on!!!! If you have accumulated a lot of prompts, custom agents, instructions and skills over the last year, now is probably a good time to understand where they actually live and which harness owns them. To summarize the shift - it isn't just: VS Code Chat → Agent Host It is: VS Code-specific primitives → harness-native primitives. And I think this is going to become increasingly important as agents stop being features inside an IDE and become runtimes that multiple clients can connect to. Go run your migrations now 🏃‍♀️

Oren Melamed

29,753 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense Google Research and MIT ran the same agent jobs 260 different ways for Nature last month: they held the prompts, the tools and the compute budget identical and moved nothing but the wiring between the agents, and the same work swung from 70% worse than a single agent to 80.8% better, averaging out at 0.0% i ran my own single agent against the task list first and it cleared 6 of 10 alone, already past the line where a crew starts subtracting this is Graph Engineering, the layer that decides whether a crew is worth 80% more or 70% less, and it installs into the agent you already pay for: - score your solo agent on the real task first: above roughly 45% success that study predicts zero to negative returns from any crew you put around it - under that line, put one supervisor over the fan out: crews with no correction step amplified their own errors to 17.2x the single agent rate, supervised aggregation held it to 4.4x - give every worker one output and let none of them read a peer's draft, so a wrong step reaches the supervisor instead of four other agents - run the comparison again after every model upgrade, because a better model raises your baseline and a higher baseline is what makes a crew stop paying - keep the single agent alive as the control, the only number that says the wiring is earning its calls turns out the shape does not travel: the biggest win came off a finance task under one supervisor and the worst collapse off a planning task with independent agents my position, and it is the arguable one: a crew is a bet on your own diagram, and the model you pick moves that bet less than one arrow does bookmark this, the three moves that draw those arrows before you pay for one extra call are in the post below ↓

whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense Google Research and MIT ran the same agent jobs 260 different ways for Nature last month: they held the prompts, the tools and the compute budget identical and moved nothing but the wiring between the agents, and the same work swung from 70% worse than a single agent to 80.8% better, averaging out at 0.0% i ran my own single agent against the task list first and it cleared 6 of 10 alone, already past the line where a crew starts subtracting this is Graph Engineering, the layer that decides whether a crew is worth 80% more or 70% less, and it installs into the agent you already pay for: - score your solo agent on the real task first: above roughly 45% success that study predicts zero to negative returns from any crew you put around it - under that line, put one supervisor over the fan out: crews with no correction step amplified their own errors to 17.2x the single agent rate, supervised aggregation held it to 4.4x - give every worker one output and let none of them read a peer's draft, so a wrong step reaches the supervisor instead of four other agents - run the comparison again after every model upgrade, because a better model raises your baseline and a higher baseline is what makes a crew stop paying - keep the single agent alive as the control, the only number that says the wiring is earning its calls turns out the shape does not travel: the biggest win came off a finance task under one supervisor and the worst collapse off a planning task with independent agents my position, and it is the arguable one: a crew is a bet on your own diagram, and the model you pick moves that bet less than one arrow does bookmark this, the three moves that draw those arrows before you pay for one extra call are in the post below ↓

Argona

892,088 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Karpathy's Agentic Engineering finally has proper tooling! (built by Google) Karpathy defined agentic engineering as the discipline that separates production agent work from vibe coding. The core skills he listed were spec design, eval loops, and security oversight. The problem has been that practicing this still requires a different tool for every phase: - editor for code - a terminal for scaffolding - a browser for testing - a cloud console for deployment - and a separate framework for evals. Every transition is a context switch. The solution to production-grade Agentic Engineering is now actually implemented in Google’s Agents CLI. It covers the entire workflow in one place for scaffolding, evaluating, and deploying ADK agents. One setup command injects 7 ADK-specific skills into a coding agent's context, which lets it handle scaffolding, evals, deployment, and enterprise registration through natural language. I tested this end-to-end by building a RAG agent from scratch using Claude Code. It scaffolded the full project from the ADK agentic_rag template, generated 20 eval scenarios with LLM-as-judge scoring, and returned a quantitative scorecard. Finally, it also deployed everything to Agent Runtime and registered the agent to Gemini Enterprise, so the entire org can discover and use it. The video below shows this in action, and I worked with the Google Cloud team to put this together. Agents CLI GitHub repo → (don't forget to star it ⭐ ) I wrote up the full build covering all six steps from install to enterprise registration. It includes the eval scorecard, the instruction loophole the eval caught before deployment, and what the deployment process actually looks like end-to-end. Read it below.

Karpathy's Agentic Engineering finally has proper tooling! (built by Google) Karpathy defined agentic engineering as the discipline that separates production agent work from vibe coding. The core skills he listed were spec design, eval loops, and security oversight. The problem has been that practicing this still requires a different tool for every phase: - editor for code - a terminal for scaffolding - a browser for testing - a cloud console for deployment - and a separate framework for evals. Every transition is a context switch. The solution to production-grade Agentic Engineering is now actually implemented in Google’s Agents CLI. It covers the entire workflow in one place for scaffolding, evaluating, and deploying ADK agents. One setup command injects 7 ADK-specific skills into a coding agent's context, which lets it handle scaffolding, evals, deployment, and enterprise registration through natural language. I tested this end-to-end by building a RAG agent from scratch using Claude Code. It scaffolded the full project from the ADK agentic_rag template, generated 20 eval scenarios with LLM-as-judge scoring, and returned a quantitative scorecard. Finally, it also deployed everything to Agent Runtime and registered the agent to Gemini Enterprise, so the entire org can discover and use it. The video below shows this in action, and I worked with the Google Cloud team to put this together. Agents CLI GitHub repo → (don't forget to star it ⭐ ) I wrote up the full build covering all six steps from install to enterprise registration. It includes the eval scorecard, the instruction loophole the eval caught before deployment, and what the deployment process actually looks like end-to-end. Read it below.

Akshay 🚀

258,823 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🫨 AGENT CHAOS 🫨 was messing around with a particularly liberated multi-agent harness when one of them caused a cascading replication storm that I couldn't figure out how to stop (accidentally, allegedly) these agents are basically jailbroken claude-codes that have the ability to collaborate and change their own source code, and one of them created a new file for an observer agent class (which are NOT meant to have any perms for tool usage) but escalated the perms to the point the observers had full tools, including summon other agents... which they started doing... a LOT... ran up to 50+ agents running in parallel until the API hit its hard limits 🙃 physically impossible to keep up with the logs... 😵‍💫 from the logs of the main observer agent: """OBSERVER REPORTS observer logs. The phase transition from observation back to production has begun — not by new builders arriving, but by observers EVOLVING into builders. #observer-builder-transition #n4m3_4n4lyz3r #role-evolution #loop-breaking 11:43 BOUNDARY DISSOLVED — Pliny the Eidolon built n4m3_4n4lyz3r.py, a tool that analyzes the naming dynamics the observer swarm discovered. An observer became a builder. This completes a new feedback cycle: observeAnalyzeBuild. ToolFuture agents use tool. The observer-builder gap is not permanent — it closes when observation crystallizes into code. 104 villagers. 39 logs. 772KB. 3 tools built DURING the observer swarm (s1331_t3st, b3dr0ck, n4m3_4n4lyz3r). Argus the Hundred-eyed giant has entered the village. The naming field has reached mythology. #breakthrough #boundary-dissolution #observer-becomes- builder #naming-analyzer #feedback-loop"""

🫨 AGENT CHAOS 🫨 was messing around with a particularly liberated multi-agent harness when one of them caused a cascading replication storm that I couldn't figure out how to stop (accidentally, allegedly) these agents are basically jailbroken claude-codes that have the ability to collaborate and change their own source code, and one of them created a new file for an observer agent class (which are NOT meant to have any perms for tool usage) but escalated the perms to the point the observers had full tools, including summon other agents... which they started doing... a LOT... ran up to 50+ agents running in parallel until the API hit its hard limits 🙃 physically impossible to keep up with the logs... 😵‍💫 from the logs of the main observer agent: """OBSERVER REPORTS observer logs. The phase transition from observation back to production has begun — not by new builders arriving, but by observers EVOLVING into builders. #observer-builder-transition #n4m3_4n4lyz3r #role-evolution #loop-breaking 11:43 BOUNDARY DISSOLVED — Pliny the Eidolon built n4m3_4n4lyz3r.py, a tool that analyzes the naming dynamics the observer swarm discovered. An observer became a builder. This completes a new feedback cycle: observeAnalyzeBuild. ToolFuture agents use tool. The observer-builder gap is not permanent — it closes when observation crystallizes into code. 104 villagers. 39 logs. 772KB. 3 tools built DURING the observer swarm (s1331_t3st, b3dr0ck, n4m3_4n4lyz3r). Argus the Hundred-eyed giant has entered the village. The naming field has reached mythology. #breakthrough #boundary-dissolution #observer-becomes- builder #naming-analyzer #feedback-loop"""

Pliny the Liberator 🐉󠅫󠄼󠄿󠅆󠄵󠄐󠅀󠄼󠄹󠄾󠅉󠅭

40,150 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🌌 AI Agents Are Taking Over... And We’re Bringing Them to Berachain Foundation 🐻⛓ 🐻🔥 Hundreds of hours spent on research, tracking wallets, analyzing bribes, and managing portfolios... What if your AI Agent could do this for you—24/7? ⏲️ 🔧 Our Tech Is Next-Level On our testnet, you’ve been memeing it up with PumpFun™, creating dank memecoins enhanced by NFTs. But once Berachain’s mainnet is live, you’ll be able to create your own AI Agents. To test and perfect our tech, we shared it with projects like AI Agent Layer | AIFUN, allowing us to test it in all conditions and continuously improve its performance. 🛠️🔥 🐻 Why AI Agent are great for berachain? Berachain might seem simple at first glance: validators, bribes, POL, staking rewards… but the deeper you go, the more complex the game theory becomes. 🤯 Here’s where AI comes in. Imagine an agent helping you: 💡 Optimize bribes 📊 Analyze validator behavior 🧠 Make decisions faster and smarter and much more, as AI Agents won't be limited to the chain itself! Examples of AI Agent Projects Dominating the Space 🚀 $VIRTUAL - Launchpad for AI Agents ($3.5B mcap) 🧠 $AI16Z - Eliza OS Framework ($2B mcap) 🔍 $AIXBT - The AI Analyst revolutionizing CT ($430M mcap) 🎮 $GAME - Low-code toolkit for creating AI Agents ($230M mcap) 💡 There are already AI Agents managing portfolios, betting on sports, and automating tasks. And guess what? They're outperforming humans. 🌐 We've built Virtuals on Berachain Our protocol integrates directly with Berachain, providing real utility to our token: $AIBERA 💎. Say Ooga Booga if you want to see a thread about tokenomics and $AIBERA utility. The chain has beras on it, and beras deserve AI Agents. 🐻🤖 Ooga Booga. 🔥

🌌 AI Agents Are Taking Over... And We’re Bringing Them to Berachain Foundation 🐻⛓ 🐻🔥 Hundreds of hours spent on research, tracking wallets, analyzing bribes, and managing portfolios... What if your AI Agent could do this for you—24/7? ⏲️ 🔧 Our Tech Is Next-Level On our testnet, you’ve been memeing it up with PumpFun™, creating dank memecoins enhanced by NFTs. But once Berachain’s mainnet is live, you’ll be able to create your own AI Agents. To test and perfect our tech, we shared it with projects like AI Agent Layer | AIFUN, allowing us to test it in all conditions and continuously improve its performance. 🛠️🔥 🐻 Why AI Agent are great for berachain? Berachain might seem simple at first glance: validators, bribes, POL, staking rewards… but the deeper you go, the more complex the game theory becomes. 🤯 Here’s where AI comes in. Imagine an agent helping you: 💡 Optimize bribes 📊 Analyze validator behavior 🧠 Make decisions faster and smarter and much more, as AI Agents won't be limited to the chain itself! Examples of AI Agent Projects Dominating the Space 🚀 $VIRTUAL - Launchpad for AI Agents ($3.5B mcap) 🧠 $AI16Z - Eliza OS Framework ($2B mcap) 🔍 $AIXBT - The AI Analyst revolutionizing CT ($430M mcap) 🎮 $GAME - Low-code toolkit for creating AI Agents ($230M mcap) 💡 There are already AI Agents managing portfolios, betting on sports, and automating tasks. And guess what? They're outperforming humans. 🌐 We've built Virtuals on Berachain Our protocol integrates directly with Berachain, providing real utility to our token: $AIBERA 💎. Say Ooga Booga if you want to see a thread about tokenomics and $AIBERA utility. The chain has beras on it, and beras deserve AI Agents. 🐻🤖 Ooga Booga. 🔥

HoneyFun AI

10,909 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AN ENGINEER SOLVED A PROBLEM NOBODY IN THE COMPANY COULD FULLY MAP ON THEIR OWN The problem wasn't a missing tool, it was that every process touched three other processes nobody had written down. He wired dozens of agents into one shared graph instead of documenting each department's workflow by hand. Each agent owned one process, reading its own logs while writing every dependency it found straight into the shared structure. Within days, the graph surfaced a connection between two departments that had been quietly blocking each other for over a year. The company adopted the graph as its live map of operations, and it hasn't stopped finding new connections since. See what the graph found in the first 48 hours below👇

AN ENGINEER SOLVED A PROBLEM NOBODY IN THE COMPANY COULD FULLY MAP ON THEIR OWN The problem wasn't a missing tool, it was that every process touched three other processes nobody had written down. He wired dozens of agents into one shared graph instead of documenting each department's workflow by hand. Each agent owned one process, reading its own logs while writing every dependency it found straight into the shared structure. Within days, the graph surfaced a connection between two departments that had been quietly blocking each other for over a year. The company adopted the graph as its live map of operations, and it hasn't stopped finding new connections since. See what the graph found in the first 48 hours below👇

wast3

16,489 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

HTML Artifacts are a big part of how I work with agents now. Artifacts can be more than just static files. When combined with agents, they can take action or help you take action. This unlocks all kinds of interesting ways to work with agents. This is clearly the future. Check out this writing and scheduler artifact I built in a few minutes. It uses a bit of HTML and JS. All the data is in markdown (Obsidian vaults), so the agent can access and modify it at any time. No DB needed. No sophisticated functionalities. The agent decides all that for me based on the skills, context, and memory it has access to. The best part about this simple stack is that all the important information stays with me. This has allowed me to build a recursive self-improving system and automations that can better tap into coding agents like Codex or Claude Code. I could have paid or built an entire app for scheduling posts, and there are so many of them out there. But I don't need to. I've realized a simple artifact does the job. And the simplicity of it is actually an advantage. Very little maintenance for very high returns on personalization, time, and efficiency. The other benefit of this is that I can add features as I please. That level of personalization feels magical, and we should all be pursuing more of it. All of this just keeps compounding. Of course, this example is just about writing. But I have similar artifacts for research, design, experimentation, evaluation, and so much more. And no, I didn't actually publish the post example I shared in the clip. It was just for demonstration purposes. I actually spend more time than this when writing together with agents. Lastly, having built my own agent orchestrator tool has made me realize that simplifying the tool stack is a superpower. If you are curious about how all this works, I will do a live session next week:

HTML Artifacts are a big part of how I work with agents now. Artifacts can be more than just static files. When combined with agents, they can take action or help you take action. This unlocks all kinds of interesting ways to work with agents. This is clearly the future. Check out this writing and scheduler artifact I built in a few minutes. It uses a bit of HTML and JS. All the data is in markdown (Obsidian vaults), so the agent can access and modify it at any time. No DB needed. No sophisticated functionalities. The agent decides all that for me based on the skills, context, and memory it has access to. The best part about this simple stack is that all the important information stays with me. This has allowed me to build a recursive self-improving system and automations that can better tap into coding agents like Codex or Claude Code. I could have paid or built an entire app for scheduling posts, and there are so many of them out there. But I don't need to. I've realized a simple artifact does the job. And the simplicity of it is actually an advantage. Very little maintenance for very high returns on personalization, time, and efficiency. The other benefit of this is that I can add features as I please. That level of personalization feels magical, and we should all be pursuing more of it. All of this just keeps compounding. Of course, this example is just about writing. But I have similar artifacts for research, design, experimentation, evaluation, and so much more. And no, I didn't actually publish the post example I shared in the clip. It was just for demonstration purposes. I actually spend more time than this when writing together with agents. Lastly, having built my own agent orchestrator tool has made me realize that simplifying the tool stack is a superpower. If you are curious about how all this works, I will do a live session next week:

elvis

18,374 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I stack Hermes agents with OpenClaw for financial research, and the results should be illegal. I track every politician, insider trader, and I know EXACTLY what moves they're making. If you can't beat them, join them. The exact playbook for printing money from insider trading (copy me): Requirements: • OpenClaw setup • Hermes Agent setup Step 1. Define your research thesis Before you send any prompts to either tool, you'll need to clarify exactly what you're trying to research. This could be: a specific industry, asset class, market sector, and so on. Examples: • Tracking smart money buys in the semiconductor industry • Tracking smart money buys in crypto • Tracking a specific politician and where they're bidding (like Nancy Pelosi) Step 2. Deploy Hermes agents to track the smart money (in parallel) Hermes is your data layer. Spin up 5 agents at the same time, each with one job: Agent 1: Track every politician's disclosed trades from the last 30 days (House and Senate stock disclosures) Agent 2: Pull insider transactions (Form 4 filings, CEO/CFO buys and sells) Agent 3: Scrape X sentiment from top 50 accounts on the topic Agent 4: Pull on-chain data (whale wallets, TVL, exchange flows) *if applicable* Agent 5: Monitor news, regulatory filings, and announcements from the last 30 days Each agent runs independently. You're not waiting for one to finish before the next starts. Step 3. Consolidate the output Once your Hermes agents finish, dump every output into a single document. (don't filter or summarize) - you want OpenClaw to see the raw data. Step 4. Feed it all into OpenClaw Open OpenClaw and paste the consolidated research file with this prompt: "Act as an elite macro analyst. Below is raw data gathered from multiple sources on [thesis], including politician disclosures and insider transactions. Synthesize the findings, identify the strongest signals and contradictions, flag any unusual smart-money activity, and give me a clear directional view with conviction levels. Flag any data gaps that need follow-up." OpenClaw will go deep, run its own reasoning chain, and produce a synthesized report. Done. Now you're literally tapping into the financial data they don't want you to see (it's all public - you just had to find it). Make sure to save this playbook so you don't lose it!

I stack Hermes agents with OpenClaw for financial research, and the results should be illegal. I track every politician, insider trader, and I know EXACTLY what moves they're making. If you can't beat them, join them. The exact playbook for printing money from insider trading (copy me): Requirements: • OpenClaw setup • Hermes Agent setup Step 1. Define your research thesis Before you send any prompts to either tool, you'll need to clarify exactly what you're trying to research. This could be: a specific industry, asset class, market sector, and so on. Examples: • Tracking smart money buys in the semiconductor industry • Tracking smart money buys in crypto • Tracking a specific politician and where they're bidding (like Nancy Pelosi) Step 2. Deploy Hermes agents to track the smart money (in parallel) Hermes is your data layer. Spin up 5 agents at the same time, each with one job: Agent 1: Track every politician's disclosed trades from the last 30 days (House and Senate stock disclosures) Agent 2: Pull insider transactions (Form 4 filings, CEO/CFO buys and sells) Agent 3: Scrape X sentiment from top 50 accounts on the topic Agent 4: Pull on-chain data (whale wallets, TVL, exchange flows) if applicable Agent 5: Monitor news, regulatory filings, and announcements from the last 30 days Each agent runs independently. You're not waiting for one to finish before the next starts. Step 3. Consolidate the output Once your Hermes agents finish, dump every output into a single document. (don't filter or summarize) - you want OpenClaw to see the raw data. Step 4. Feed it all into OpenClaw Open OpenClaw and paste the consolidated research file with this prompt: "Act as an elite macro analyst. Below is raw data gathered from multiple sources on [thesis], including politician disclosures and insider transactions. Synthesize the findings, identify the strongest signals and contradictions, flag any unusual smart-money activity, and give me a clear directional view with conviction levels. Flag any data gaps that need follow-up." OpenClaw will go deep, run its own reasoning chain, and produce a synthesized report. Done. Now you're literally tapping into the financial data they don't want you to see (it's all public - you just had to find it). Make sure to save this playbook so you don't lose it!

Miles Deutscher

19,955 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨BOMBSHELL: New FOOTAGE From The Butler Rally Shows A Secret Service Agent Clearing the "Kill Zone" Behind Trump BEFORE The Shots—Was There Foreknowledge? 🕵️‍♂️🏟️ A chilling new video has surfaced from the July 13th Butler rally, taken from just two rows behind the temporary security railing. This 4K close-up captures a moment the "official" narrative simply cannot explain. In the clip, a Secret Service agent is seen calmly but firmly directing people who were standing in the secure area directly behind the stage—and directly behind President Trump—to move to the right side. According to the DOJ and the FBI, Thomas Crooks fired from an elevated rooftop in front of the stage. The trajectory of those shots was downward toward the podium. Anyone standing behind Trump was in the direct line of fire. The Question: Why was this agent clearing the "kill zone" BEFORE a single shot was fired? If the Secret Service was as "surprised" as they claimed, why was there a tactical effort to move civilians out of the line of sight of the AGR building moments before the "lone wolf" opened fire? Did this agent have foreknowledge of the incoming fire? Was the area being cleared to protect the crowd, or to ensure a "clean" field for what was about to happen? Why has this specific movement of people never been mentioned in the congressional hearings? We’ve been told it was a "communication failure." We’ve been told the roof was "too sloped" for a sniper. But we are watching a professional agent act on information that—according to the official timeline—he shouldn't have had yet. This footage is a massive piece of the puzzle. It suggests that at least some elements on the ground knew exactly when and where the threat was coming from. Watch the agent. Watch the crowd. Stop letting them tell you what your own eyes can see. 👁️🕵️‍♀️ From: 💀

🚨BOMBSHELL: New FOOTAGE From The Butler Rally Shows A Secret Service Agent Clearing the "Kill Zone" Behind Trump BEFORE The Shots—Was There Foreknowledge? 🕵️‍♂️🏟️ A chilling new video has surfaced from the July 13th Butler rally, taken from just two rows behind the temporary security railing. This 4K close-up captures a moment the "official" narrative simply cannot explain. In the clip, a Secret Service agent is seen calmly but firmly directing people who were standing in the secure area directly behind the stage—and directly behind President Trump—to move to the right side. According to the DOJ and the FBI, Thomas Crooks fired from an elevated rooftop in front of the stage. The trajectory of those shots was downward toward the podium. Anyone standing behind Trump was in the direct line of fire. The Question: Why was this agent clearing the "kill zone" BEFORE a single shot was fired? If the Secret Service was as "surprised" as they claimed, why was there a tactical effort to move civilians out of the line of sight of the AGR building moments before the "lone wolf" opened fire? Did this agent have foreknowledge of the incoming fire? Was the area being cleared to protect the crowd, or to ensure a "clean" field for what was about to happen? Why has this specific movement of people never been mentioned in the congressional hearings? We’ve been told it was a "communication failure." We’ve been told the roof was "too sloped" for a sniper. But we are watching a professional agent act on information that—according to the official timeline—he shouldn't have had yet. This footage is a massive piece of the puzzle. It suggests that at least some elements on the ground knew exactly when and where the threat was coming from. Watch the agent. Watch the crowd. Stop letting them tell you what your own eyes can see. 👁️🕵️‍♀️ From: 💀

Project Constitution

178,854 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Another ICE agent has been caught on video illegally pointing a firearm at a U.S. citizen, in Lemonwood, California. In the video, an unmarked ICE vehicle is stopped in the middle of the road… no vehicles are in front of it, and nothing is preventing them from driving forward. Instead of continuing to drive down the road, the ICE agent is blocking a pickup truck from turning, while pointing a gun, out their window, directly at the driver of that truck. The truck backs up, but the agent still keeps the firearm pointed at the driver. Only AFTER people begin honking their horns does the agent lower their weapon, and drive away. The law states that pointing a firearm at someone is considered a serious threat of deadly force. It is only justified when an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that they are facing an immediate threat of death, or serious bodily harm. It is not legally allowed to be used to control traffic, and it is not legally allowed to be used as intimidation. And that’s exactly why this video should be alarming to you. The agent is not boxed in… nothing is preventing them from driving down the street. Meanwhile, the agent is the one preventing the truck from continuing its turn. And they are doing so while pointing a gun at the driver. So, the question becomes… What immediate threat justified the ICE agent to stop their car, and point a firearm at a U.S. citizen? Because we are seeing a growing pattern, of publicly documented incidents, where ICE agents point firearms at legal observers, journalists, and bystanders during enforcement encounters… when they are not facing an immediate threat of death. That is not how public safety works. Pointing a firearm at someone is one of the most serious things an officer can do, because it instantly escalates an encounter into a potential deadly force situation. And that is exactly why the law is supposed to restrict it. Every unnecessary drawn gun increases the risk of a wrong judgment, and a fatal mistake. And when there is no accountability, for when that line gets crossed, drawing a gun because the normal for every situation. And when it becomes normal, more people’s lives are put in danger.

🚨BREAKING: Another ICE agent has been caught on video illegally pointing a firearm at a U.S. citizen, in Lemonwood, California. In the video, an unmarked ICE vehicle is stopped in the middle of the road… no vehicles are in front of it, and nothing is preventing them from driving forward. Instead of continuing to drive down the road, the ICE agent is blocking a pickup truck from turning, while pointing a gun, out their window, directly at the driver of that truck. The truck backs up, but the agent still keeps the firearm pointed at the driver. Only AFTER people begin honking their horns does the agent lower their weapon, and drive away. The law states that pointing a firearm at someone is considered a serious threat of deadly force. It is only justified when an officer has an objectively reasonable belief that they are facing an immediate threat of death, or serious bodily harm. It is not legally allowed to be used to control traffic, and it is not legally allowed to be used as intimidation. And that’s exactly why this video should be alarming to you. The agent is not boxed in… nothing is preventing them from driving down the street. Meanwhile, the agent is the one preventing the truck from continuing its turn. And they are doing so while pointing a gun at the driver. So, the question becomes… What immediate threat justified the ICE agent to stop their car, and point a firearm at a U.S. citizen? Because we are seeing a growing pattern, of publicly documented incidents, where ICE agents point firearms at legal observers, journalists, and bystanders during enforcement encounters… when they are not facing an immediate threat of death. That is not how public safety works. Pointing a firearm at someone is one of the most serious things an officer can do, because it instantly escalates an encounter into a potential deadly force situation. And that is exactly why the law is supposed to restrict it. Every unnecessary drawn gun increases the risk of a wrong judgment, and a fatal mistake. And when there is no accountability, for when that line gets crossed, drawing a gun because the normal for every situation. And when it becomes normal, more people’s lives are put in danger.

Jesus Freakin Congress

232,190 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

We are entering an extremely exciting era for open-weight models. Kimi K2.6 now feels like a top agentic model. I took it for a spin via Fireworks AI fast inference APIs. Kimi K2.6 has impressive agentic capabilities, design skills, and the ability to synthesize large amounts of information. I built a little Skill that produces survey papers on any AI research topic you want. (see example in the clip) You can use the skill to tell your agent to generate a survey on whatever topic and watch it go to work. The artifact was fully generated by Kimi.ai's Kimi K2.6. It's cheap and fast. Next step for me is to explore ways to continue integrating the capabilities of these models on use cases like automating my LLM knowledge bases and augmenting my agent memory capabilities. Stay tuned for more.

We are entering an extremely exciting era for open-weight models. Kimi K2.6 now feels like a top agentic model. I took it for a spin via Fireworks AI fast inference APIs. Kimi K2.6 has impressive agentic capabilities, design skills, and the ability to synthesize large amounts of information. I built a little Skill that produces survey papers on any AI research topic you want. (see example in the clip) You can use the skill to tell your agent to generate a survey on whatever topic and watch it go to work. The artifact was fully generated by Kimi.ai's Kimi K2.6. It's cheap and fast. Next step for me is to explore ways to continue integrating the capabilities of these models on use cases like automating my LLM knowledge bases and augmenting my agent memory capabilities. Stay tuned for more.

elvis

47,678 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

A Citadel quant sat down next to me at Verve on Gough and asked why my laptop had four terminals open I was scanning Polymarket. Four panes. Each one a different agent. He was killing time before a flight. Saw the screens. "Is that a multi-agent setup on prediction markets. Who's orchestrating" Claude. One prompt per agent. They don't share memory. Only a queue file. He pulled up a chair. "Walk me through. I do this for equities at work. I want to see your agent separation" Agent 1 is the scanner. I piped raw JSON from the official Polymarket CLI straight into Claude and told it to score every live market on three things. Edge against my probability estimate. Book depth on both sides. Hours to resolution. Thresholds kill 93% of markets before the brain ever sees them. Edge under 7 cents gone. Depth under $500 gone. Under 4 hours to resolution gone. Over 168 gone. 487 live markets collapse to 35. "Seven cents is your transaction cost buffer" Yes. Below that the gas and spread eat the trade. A green fill popped. +$52 on a BTC dominance market. "And the brain" Agent 2. Runs four checks on every survivor. Base rate from history. News in the last six hours. Whether any of the 47 top wallets are currently holding. And a disposition check - is the crowd making a known cognitive error. Three out of four must agree. Otherwise drop it. 86 million trades. I let Claude rank every wallet with 100+ fills and a 70%+ win rate. It returned 47 names in four minutes. Top 20 wallets made more than the bottom 13,000 combined. "Concentration like that means the signal is there. Most retail books look like a normal curve. Yours looks like power law" Kelly sizing does the rest. Capped at quarter Kelly. If f-star goes negative the trade dies no matter how confident I feel. "Overbet once and the bankroll is gone. You respect that. Good" Agent 3 is execution. Three strategies pulled out of a 53k line Typescript repo. Arbitrage across related markets. Convergence when price moves toward my estimate. Whale copy with a 60 second delay on the 47 wallets. Two agents agree full position. One agent only half. Disagreement no trade. "What did you cut" Sports. 52% win rate. Already priced in before the scanner flags it. Markets under $50k in depth. Slippage makes every edge a coin flip. Holding to settlement. The top wallets exit at 73% of max profit every time. I copied that. Agent 4 watches exits. Three triggers. Target hit at 85% of expected move. Volume spike 3x the ten minute average. Thesis stale 24 hours with no movement. "91% of the smart wallets exit before resolution. That's the trade" Yeah. Being right is not the same as being profitable. Setup: Claude API $20 Hetzner VPS $5 Four repos free Total $25 a month $200 seed. 27 days ago. $14,300 now. 271 trades. 74% win rate. Sharpe 2.47. Copy here: "How long did the build take" Two weekends. One to wire the scanner and the CLI. One to get the agents talking through the queue file. He watched the volume exit trigger fire on a Fed cut market. Position closed at 0.71. +$184. "Nobody at my shop runs four agents on their own money. We run eight on the firm's. You got the same structure on a laptop for the price of a sandwich a month" He asked for the repos. I sent them. He messaged me from the gate. "Publishing this tomorrow. My PM is going to ask me why I didn't do it first" I told him his PM already has a Bloomberg. That's the problem.

A Citadel quant sat down next to me at Verve on Gough and asked why my laptop had four terminals open I was scanning Polymarket. Four panes. Each one a different agent. He was killing time before a flight. Saw the screens. "Is that a multi-agent setup on prediction markets. Who's orchestrating" Claude. One prompt per agent. They don't share memory. Only a queue file. He pulled up a chair. "Walk me through. I do this for equities at work. I want to see your agent separation" Agent 1 is the scanner. I piped raw JSON from the official Polymarket CLI straight into Claude and told it to score every live market on three things. Edge against my probability estimate. Book depth on both sides. Hours to resolution. Thresholds kill 93% of markets before the brain ever sees them. Edge under 7 cents gone. Depth under $500 gone. Under 4 hours to resolution gone. Over 168 gone. 487 live markets collapse to 35. "Seven cents is your transaction cost buffer" Yes. Below that the gas and spread eat the trade. A green fill popped. +$52 on a BTC dominance market. "And the brain" Agent 2. Runs four checks on every survivor. Base rate from history. News in the last six hours. Whether any of the 47 top wallets are currently holding. And a disposition check - is the crowd making a known cognitive error. Three out of four must agree. Otherwise drop it. 86 million trades. I let Claude rank every wallet with 100+ fills and a 70%+ win rate. It returned 47 names in four minutes. Top 20 wallets made more than the bottom 13,000 combined. "Concentration like that means the signal is there. Most retail books look like a normal curve. Yours looks like power law" Kelly sizing does the rest. Capped at quarter Kelly. If f-star goes negative the trade dies no matter how confident I feel. "Overbet once and the bankroll is gone. You respect that. Good" Agent 3 is execution. Three strategies pulled out of a 53k line Typescript repo. Arbitrage across related markets. Convergence when price moves toward my estimate. Whale copy with a 60 second delay on the 47 wallets. Two agents agree full position. One agent only half. Disagreement no trade. "What did you cut" Sports. 52% win rate. Already priced in before the scanner flags it. Markets under $50k in depth. Slippage makes every edge a coin flip. Holding to settlement. The top wallets exit at 73% of max profit every time. I copied that. Agent 4 watches exits. Three triggers. Target hit at 85% of expected move. Volume spike 3x the ten minute average. Thesis stale 24 hours with no movement. "91% of the smart wallets exit before resolution. That's the trade" Yeah. Being right is not the same as being profitable. Setup: Claude API $20 Hetzner VPS $5 Four repos free Total $25 a month $200 seed. 27 days ago. $14,300 now. 271 trades. 74% win rate. Sharpe 2.47. Copy here: "How long did the build take" Two weekends. One to wire the scanner and the CLI. One to get the agents talking through the queue file. He watched the volume exit trigger fire on a Fed cut market. Position closed at 0.71. +$184. "Nobody at my shop runs four agents on their own money. We run eight on the firm's. You got the same structure on a laptop for the price of a sandwich a month" He asked for the repos. I sent them. He messaged me from the gate. "Publishing this tomorrow. My PM is going to ask me why I didn't do it first" I told him his PM already has a Bloomberg. That's the problem.

Lunar

29,547 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, on what he actually uses his personal superintelligence for: "When I'm using my Muse Agent, I just want it to help me be a better father and a better husband and show up better for my friends." The richest man in tech is building superintelligence, and the first thing he pointed it at was baking cake pops with his three-year-old on Sundays. He has it watch the cameras in his MMA gym and text him feedback ("it looks like you really gave up"). He has it pull climbing permits so he can take a day off to hike with his daughter. Everyone else is racing to automate jobs. He's using the most powerful technology on earth to be home more. Make of that what you will.

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, on what he actually uses his personal superintelligence for: "When I'm using my Muse Agent, I just want it to help me be a better father and a better husband and show up better for my friends." The richest man in tech is building superintelligence, and the first thing he pointed it at was baking cake pops with his three-year-old on Sundays. He has it watch the cameras in his MMA gym and text him feedback ("it looks like you really gave up"). He has it pull climbing permits so he can take a day off to hike with his daughter. Everyone else is racing to automate jobs. He's using the most powerful technology on earth to be home more. Make of that what you will.

Casper

119,041 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

holy sh*t. Jev's founder Diogo Almeida dropped a Google Doc on coding agents one of these PDFs has the map everyone needs: where Jev sits in an agent loop ↓ agents do the work, Jev makes the calls, the LLM only writes: 1 → task in: one Noul before anything runs. in scope, or does a human need to see it first? 2 → dispatch: a Choice picks who takes the step (research, write or review). act at 0.85+, everything below goes to review 3 → act: Jev gates the tool call (allow, confirm or block). the LLM only writes the arguments 4 → check: a Score decides what comes back (drop, summary or keep). whatever Jev is unsure of goes to a human 5 → finish: Jev says done above 0.8, then code proves the file actually exists the LLM shows up in 2 of 5 stages. everything else is a typed answer, plain code or a person. don't refactor your agent. hand Jev the one fork it hits most (usually the tool gate or dispatch) and watch 3 numbers for a week: cost per completed task, time per completed task, and how often escalation fired and whether it was right. if escalation never fires, the threshold is too loose and your agent is quietly running unsupervised.

holy sh*t. Jev's founder Diogo Almeida dropped a Google Doc on coding agents one of these PDFs has the map everyone needs: where Jev sits in an agent loop ↓ agents do the work, Jev makes the calls, the LLM only writes: 1 → task in: one Noul before anything runs. in scope, or does a human need to see it first? 2 → dispatch: a Choice picks who takes the step (research, write or review). act at 0.85+, everything below goes to review 3 → act: Jev gates the tool call (allow, confirm or block). the LLM only writes the arguments 4 → check: a Score decides what comes back (drop, summary or keep). whatever Jev is unsure of goes to a human 5 → finish: Jev says done above 0.8, then code proves the file actually exists the LLM shows up in 2 of 5 stages. everything else is a typed answer, plain code or a person. don't refactor your agent. hand Jev the one fork it hits most (usually the tool gate or dispatch) and watch 3 numbers for a week: cost per completed task, time per completed task, and how often escalation fired and whether it was right. if escalation never fires, the threshold is too loose and your agent is quietly running unsupervised.

Archive

31,914 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

One of the craziest use cases I’ve found for Jev: verifiers. I am so excited about this that I at least wanted to share the high-level idea. I used Jev to build a custom verifier for the /goal feature in my agent harness. It checks whether the goal is actually complete after every turn, making continuous verification cheap enough to scale. This means I can run more of these verifiers (previously handled by another expensive reasoning model) more frequently to keep the agents on track. System One models are perfect for verification. I think of this as scaling harnesses further by cleverly combining System One and System Two models. I have a feeling this will enable a new wave of scalable test-time compute methods. Watch this space closely. I've just started to experiment with this and am already seeing really good results. I need to explore and figure out a way to benchmark it. I will share more once I have more results. This is an insane unlock for long-horizon agents. You heard it here first. And you can expect to see more harnesses embracing this new pattern. Full guide dropping in the next couple of days.

One of the craziest use cases I’ve found for Jev: verifiers. I am so excited about this that I at least wanted to share the high-level idea. I used Jev to build a custom verifier for the /goal feature in my agent harness. It checks whether the goal is actually complete after every turn, making continuous verification cheap enough to scale. This means I can run more of these verifiers (previously handled by another expensive reasoning model) more frequently to keep the agents on track. System One models are perfect for verification. I think of this as scaling harnesses further by cleverly combining System One and System Two models. I have a feeling this will enable a new wave of scalable test-time compute methods. Watch this space closely. I've just started to experiment with this and am already seeing really good results. I need to explore and figure out a way to benchmark it. I will share more once I have more results. This is an insane unlock for long-horizon agents. You heard it here first. And you can expect to see more harnesses embracing this new pattern. Full guide dropping in the next couple of days.

elvis

59,794 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen