Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

I think SpaceX should launch Starphone 🛰️📱 Calls, texting, maps (Tesla Robotaxi), payments (X Money) and @Grok⚡️ No doomscrolling or social media😌 Running on Starlink Changing how humans interact with AI & technology until Neuralink 🧠 Would you buy one??

Gfilche's profile picture

Gali

188,943 subscribers

15,642 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

X's newest positive news show! 🚨 69 Seconds! - Ep 13 Thank you for supporting original, positive, and truth-seeking content on X. What do you think Elon Musk would say to this show? In today’s vid - We learn what Neuralink is aiming to fix, Tesla Model Y becomes best selling car in Europe, Tesla releases incredible Robotaxi launch in Texas, Ai and Grok get spanked by Elon Musk, and The Boring Company proposes an expansion in Nashville, Tennessee.
1:44

X's newest positive news show! 🚨 69 Seconds! - Ep 13 Thank you for supporting original, positive, and truth-seeking content on X. What do you think Elon Musk would say to this show? In today’s vid - We learn what Neuralink is aiming to fix, Tesla Model Y becomes best selling car in Europe, Tesla releases incredible Robotaxi launch in Texas, Ai and Grok get spanked by Elon Musk, and The Boring Company proposes an expansion in Nashville, Tennessee.

William Brown

19,351 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Musk has restructured his companies into one major group. X is owned by xAI, and xAI is now fully owned by SpaceX. SpaceX has filed for its IPO and aims to go public in mid June with a valuation over 1.7 trillion dollars. Elon Musk holds roughly 42 percent equity in SpaceX but controls around 85 percent of the voting power through a dual class structure. Buying shares in SpaceX will give investors indirect ownership of X, Grok, Starlink, and the big AI infrastructure plans. This combines social media data, rockets, and advanced AI under one public company. Under this new structure, how do you think content creator pay will fare?
2:28

Musk has restructured his companies into one major group. X is owned by xAI, and xAI is now fully owned by SpaceX. SpaceX has filed for its IPO and aims to go public in mid June with a valuation over 1.7 trillion dollars. Elon Musk holds roughly 42 percent equity in SpaceX but controls around 85 percent of the voting power through a dual class structure. Buying shares in SpaceX will give investors indirect ownership of X, Grok, Starlink, and the big AI infrastructure plans. This combines social media data, rockets, and advanced AI under one public company. Under this new structure, how do you think content creator pay will fare?

SafetySwipe

24,609 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Founders don’t fail because of bad ideas. They fail because they try to do EVERYTHING themselves. That’s why Marblism just launched on Product Hunt — giving you AI employees you can instantly hire: 👩‍💼 Executive Assistant 📈 Sales Associate 📱 Social Media Manager … and more. Here’s the bold claim: If you’re still scaling with only human hires, you might already be falling behind. ⚡marblism is trending #1 on Product Hunt today → Would you trust an AI employee to run your inbox or sales? Or do you think humans are still irreplaceable? 👇 Ulric Musset
1:33

Founders don’t fail because of bad ideas. They fail because they try to do EVERYTHING themselves. That’s why Marblism just launched on Product Hunt — giving you AI employees you can instantly hire: 👩‍💼 Executive Assistant 📈 Sales Associate 📱 Social Media Manager … and more. Here’s the bold claim: If you’re still scaling with only human hires, you might already be falling behind. ⚡marblism is trending #1 on Product Hunt today → Would you trust an AI employee to run your inbox or sales? Or do you think humans are still irreplaceable? 👇 Ulric Musset

Vinay Bharambe

39,011 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

CHAMATH: ELON IS BUILDING THE MOST POWERFUL AI STACK ON EARTH “They are the closest to having that vertically integrated stack that I spoke about. I think that Tesla has the best vision models now; with xAI, they'll have one of the best LLMs and reasoning models, and they'll be able to eventually stick that on Dojo. And then that will be in all of the physical AI that you will interact with in your daily life; whether it's a robot, or whether it's a car, or whether it's a Robotaxi.” Source: The All-In Podcast, Chamath Palihapitiya, @jason
1:04

CHAMATH: ELON IS BUILDING THE MOST POWERFUL AI STACK ON EARTH “They are the closest to having that vertically integrated stack that I spoke about. I think that Tesla has the best vision models now; with xAI, they'll have one of the best LLMs and reasoning models, and they'll be able to eventually stick that on Dojo. And then that will be in all of the physical AI that you will interact with in your daily life; whether it's a robot, or whether it's a car, or whether it's a Robotaxi.” Source: The All-In Podcast, Chamath Palihapitiya, @jason

Mario Nawfal

57,594 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸 ELON: SYMBIOSIS WITH AI CAN KEEP HUMANITY RELEVANT Host: "What's your vision for a society where human effort is no longer required for survival or productivity? How do we avoid irrelevance?" Elon: "That’s the central question. If we become symbiotic with AI, merging human and machine intelligence, we may solve the relevance problem. Just like riding a bike or driving a car makes you superhuman in speed, AI can amplify our capabilities. That doesn’t make running irrelevant, and people still run. Humans working with machines has always raised these debates. It happened with the steam engine and the steam shovel. The best idea I have is interwoven human-machine intelligence. With something like Neuralink, we can augment our minds and become one with AI." Source: Tesla Owners Silicon Valley
2:13

🇺🇸 ELON: SYMBIOSIS WITH AI CAN KEEP HUMANITY RELEVANT Host: "What's your vision for a society where human effort is no longer required for survival or productivity? How do we avoid irrelevance?" Elon: "That’s the central question. If we become symbiotic with AI, merging human and machine intelligence, we may solve the relevance problem. Just like riding a bike or driving a car makes you superhuman in speed, AI can amplify our capabilities. That doesn’t make running irrelevant, and people still run. Humans working with machines has always raised these debates. It happened with the steam engine and the steam shovel. The best idea I have is interwoven human-machine intelligence. With something like Neuralink, we can augment our minds and become one with AI." Source: Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

Mario Nawfal

95,081 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Bro… let’s be real for a second. Elon is a straight-up nerd, if you didn’t know by now. The good kind. He’s obsessed with building cool things and spends basically every waking hour running multiple generational companies like SpaceX, Tesla, xAI, 𝕏, Neuralink, Boring Company… you really think someone living in factory floors and rocket launches, and building the world’s smartest AI has time and wants to be “hanging out” with random 25-year-olds with Epstein?? When you’re really Elon, his idea of fun is getting humans on Mars, launching code that makes FSD safer to prevent deaths, playing video games to wind down, or building technology, the closest thing he thinks is to magic, that everyone else said was impossible. People project nonsense when they don’t understand what actually excites him.
1:30

Bro… let’s be real for a second. Elon is a straight-up nerd, if you didn’t know by now. The good kind. He’s obsessed with building cool things and spends basically every waking hour running multiple generational companies like SpaceX, Tesla, xAI, 𝕏, Neuralink, Boring Company… you really think someone living in factory floors and rocket launches, and building the world’s smartest AI has time and wants to be “hanging out” with random 25-year-olds with Epstein?? When you’re really Elon, his idea of fun is getting humans on Mars, launching code that makes FSD safer to prevent deaths, playing video games to wind down, or building technology, the closest thing he thinks is to magic, that everyone else said was impossible. People project nonsense when they don’t understand what actually excites him.

Teslaconomics

63,195 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”
1:43

David Friedberg: “Gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” @jason: “Friedberg, what are your thoughts on the gaming industry versus social media versus traditional media?” david friedberg: “One way to answer that question is to think about how people spend their time.” “Do you spend more minutes on social media, or on traditional media, or playing games? And how is that trending?” “But importantly, which of those will accrue more benefit, and as a result, drive more hours spent from AI?” “One way to think about this thesis is that AI is going to ultimately accrue to video game entertainment far more than social media entertainment or traditional content.” “If you believe in AI, and you believe in the improvements in productivity, generally speaking, people in the industrialized world will generally have more free time on their hands and be able to support themselves with the deflationary effects of AI over time.” “So if there's more time on people's hands, the general market for entertainment is growing, and if the general market for entertainment is growing, gaming is the future of entertainment, and the future of gaming is AI.” “Because I think you can create dynamic, more engaging experiences that will benefit from a back and forth sort of relationship than you can with traditional content or with social media.” “If you're a noob in Fortnite, like you're an early player in Fortnite, you're mostly playing against AI, because what they do is they tune the AI to be easier to beat so that you can slowly develop your skills.” “What was happening early was they were seeing a high degree of churn in Fortnite because kids would go on and play for the first time and they'd get paired up with kids that were better than them, and so they would never win, and they would get frustrated and they would quit the game and stop.” “So the churn rate was high. So AI unlocked higher engagement and higher retention, and I think we're seeing that in a lot of different gaming platforms now.” “So AI can be used, for example, to maximally increase time, engagement, satisfaction, happiness.”

The All-In Podcast

70,365 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Lee Martin the 26th person to receive Neuralink brain-computer interface implant on Elon Musk: “I think he’s an entrepreneur and a trailblazer. Like him or not, I’m a big fan. I think it’s going to take someone like him to cure cancer—or even cure ALS one day—because no one else is really doing it. Neuralink is out there pioneering. “How do you even think about putting a microchip in someone’s brain to improve their life? I would have thought this technology was like 50 years away, but here we are in ‘26, and I’ve got it in my head. “I’m talking to you in CBC Studios, so yeah, it’s pretty wild. I feel a bit like a rock star—all for the wrong reasons.”
1:04

Lee Martin the 26th person to receive Neuralink brain-computer interface implant on Elon Musk: “I think he’s an entrepreneur and a trailblazer. Like him or not, I’m a big fan. I think it’s going to take someone like him to cure cancer—or even cure ALS one day—because no one else is really doing it. Neuralink is out there pioneering. “How do you even think about putting a microchip in someone’s brain to improve their life? I would have thought this technology was like 50 years away, but here we are in ‘26, and I’ve got it in my head. “I’m talking to you in CBC Studios, so yeah, it’s pretty wild. I feel a bit like a rock star—all for the wrong reasons.”

Katie Miller

38,134 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Elon Musk on the hardest decision in his life: “It's just when I started running out of money from PayPal and the markets went into a recession, that's when bankruptcy was knocking at the door. It was in 2008. From 2008 through 2012, bankruptcy was knocking at the door. I had one of the toughest decisions I ever had to make in 2008. I had like $40 million left or something from the PayPal sale. And I could put it all on SpaceX or all on Tesla and increase the probability that either one would survive. Or I could split it. But to me, the company's like a kid. It's not like just a company to me. So it's sort of like if you've got two kids, how could you really say, okay, we're going to let one kid starve? So I was like, I couldn't bring myself to say I'm going to, you know, definitely that company's going to die or definitely that company's going to die. So I ended up splitting the money and gave $20 million to Tesla and $20 million to SpaceX. But that could have ended up being a super dumb decision, and both companies could have gone bankrupt as a result. So at the time, I was like, 'Man, this would really suck if both companies go bankrupt because I kind of split the meal.' But then, fortunately, the fourth launch of SpaceX reached orbit. If that fourth launch had failed, SpaceX would be dead for sure. And then we closed the Tesla financing round on the last hour of the last day that it was possible, which was 6 p.m. December 24th, 2008.”
2:20

Elon Musk on the hardest decision in his life: “It's just when I started running out of money from PayPal and the markets went into a recession, that's when bankruptcy was knocking at the door. It was in 2008. From 2008 through 2012, bankruptcy was knocking at the door. I had one of the toughest decisions I ever had to make in 2008. I had like $40 million left or something from the PayPal sale. And I could put it all on SpaceX or all on Tesla and increase the probability that either one would survive. Or I could split it. But to me, the company's like a kid. It's not like just a company to me. So it's sort of like if you've got two kids, how could you really say, okay, we're going to let one kid starve? So I was like, I couldn't bring myself to say I'm going to, you know, definitely that company's going to die or definitely that company's going to die. So I ended up splitting the money and gave $20 million to Tesla and $20 million to SpaceX. But that could have ended up being a super dumb decision, and both companies could have gone bankrupt as a result. So at the time, I was like, 'Man, this would really suck if both companies go bankrupt because I kind of split the meal.' But then, fortunately, the fourth launch of SpaceX reached orbit. If that fourth launch had failed, SpaceX would be dead for sure. And then we closed the Tesla financing round on the last hour of the last day that it was possible, which was 6 p.m. December 24th, 2008.”

Eva Fo𝕏 🦊 Claudius Nero's Legion

317,697 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Anish Acharya's request for a startup: an AI companion that plays Minecraft with his son. "One of the products that I would love to exist... is what I call a contextual companion for my son who plays Minecraft." "You know, the other kids playing Minecraft may or may not be the best influence—often not the best influence." "There's this context in which they interact and, I don't know, just sort of models pro-social behaviors and is still cool and chill." "I think there's a lot of room for teaching through these types of relationships and technology can help provide that." Source: Anish Acharya on 20VC with Harry Stebbings
0:32

Anish Acharya's request for a startup: an AI companion that plays Minecraft with his son. "One of the products that I would love to exist... is what I call a contextual companion for my son who plays Minecraft." "You know, the other kids playing Minecraft may or may not be the best influence—often not the best influence." "There's this context in which they interact and, I don't know, just sort of models pro-social behaviors and is still cool and chill." "I think there's a lot of room for teaching through these types of relationships and technology can help provide that." Source: Anish Acharya on 20VC with Harry Stebbings

a16z

78,700 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In my new interview with Andy Weir, he clarifies his position on "social commentary": ANDY: “I’m not trying to change society and I'm not trying to change anyone's opinion of anything. I firmly consider myself just an entertainer. I'm just writing stories to entertain. I'm not trying to set your opinion or change your mind on anything. When you're done with one of my books, I want you to put it back on the shelf and say, "That was cool. I enjoyed reading that..." "I'm not here to solve a pessimism epidemic. All I can do is just be me. I'm not pessimistic. I think humans are really awesome. I think technology is really awesome because technology is then put into the hands of humans who are awesome." "People are afraid of AI, but AI can do things no human can. I'm like, "So can a forklift." If I give you a hammer, you could build a house or you could murder someone. There's nothing about the hammer that does it. And most people use hammers to build houses." "So I'm not afraid of technology because I'm not afraid of my fellow humanity. I'm optimistic that way."
2:28

In my new interview with Andy Weir, he clarifies his position on "social commentary": ANDY: “I’m not trying to change society and I'm not trying to change anyone's opinion of anything. I firmly consider myself just an entertainer. I'm just writing stories to entertain. I'm not trying to set your opinion or change your mind on anything. When you're done with one of my books, I want you to put it back on the shelf and say, "That was cool. I enjoyed reading that..." "I'm not here to solve a pessimism epidemic. All I can do is just be me. I'm not pessimistic. I think humans are really awesome. I think technology is really awesome because technology is then put into the hands of humans who are awesome." "People are afraid of AI, but AI can do things no human can. I'm like, "So can a forklift." If I give you a hammer, you could build a house or you could murder someone. There's nothing about the hammer that does it. And most people use hammers to build houses." "So I'm not afraid of technology because I'm not afraid of my fellow humanity. I'm optimistic that way."

Cleo Abram

155,680 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 Elon Musk on xAI and Grok: "I came to realize that really there's two choices here, either be a spectator or or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI, but if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally true seeking AI with with good values, that loves humanity, and that's what we're trying to create with Grok. Grok was the only one that weighted human life equally. You want a curious truth seeking AI. And I think a curious truth seeking AI will want to foster humanity. As long as there's at least one AI that is maximally truth seeking, it will cause embarrassment for the other AIs, and then they improve. They tend to improve just in the same way that acquiring Twitter and allowing the truth to be told and not suppressing the truth forced the other social media companies to be more truthful in the same way, having Grok be a maximally truth seeking, curious AI will force the other AI companies to be more truth seeking and fair."
4:39

🚨 Elon Musk on xAI and Grok: "I came to realize that really there's two choices here, either be a spectator or or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI, but if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally true seeking AI with with good values, that loves humanity, and that's what we're trying to create with Grok. Grok was the only one that weighted human life equally. You want a curious truth seeking AI. And I think a curious truth seeking AI will want to foster humanity. As long as there's at least one AI that is maximally truth seeking, it will cause embarrassment for the other AIs, and then they improve. They tend to improve just in the same way that acquiring Twitter and allowing the truth to be told and not suppressing the truth forced the other social media companies to be more truthful in the same way, having Grok be a maximally truth seeking, curious AI will force the other AI companies to be more truth seeking and fair."

DogeDesigner

216,533 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Elon Musk is changing the world SpaceX is making space travel much cheaper by reusing rockets. Launch costs dropped 85% and they now launch over 80% of everything going into orbit Most of SpaceX’s money actually comes from Starlink, their satellite internet service with 10 million customers, not just rocket launches Elon Musk is combining SpaceX with his other companies, xAI, Groq, and X. He’s planning to take it public through a huge IPO The big vision: Build giant AI data centers in space. Why space? - Unlimited cheap solar power from the sun - Very cold temperatures, perfect for cooling computers - No angry neighbors or strict environmental rules This would cost a fortune, so they want to raise money from public investors This in my opinion is the best part, Elon Musk is making sure he stays in control of decisions Musk will have 10x voting power over the whole company If you invest, you’re mostly betting on Elon Musk himself This is exactly what you want. You want Musk making the decisions not being overruled by people with other motives
2:50

Elon Musk is changing the world SpaceX is making space travel much cheaper by reusing rockets. Launch costs dropped 85% and they now launch over 80% of everything going into orbit Most of SpaceX’s money actually comes from Starlink, their satellite internet service with 10 million customers, not just rocket launches Elon Musk is combining SpaceX with his other companies, xAI, Groq, and X. He’s planning to take it public through a huge IPO The big vision: Build giant AI data centers in space. Why space? - Unlimited cheap solar power from the sun - Very cold temperatures, perfect for cooling computers - No angry neighbors or strict environmental rules This would cost a fortune, so they want to raise money from public investors This in my opinion is the best part, Elon Musk is making sure he stays in control of decisions Musk will have 10x voting power over the whole company If you invest, you’re mostly betting on Elon Musk himself This is exactly what you want. You want Musk making the decisions not being overruled by people with other motives

Wall Street Apes

28,675 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ELON: I DON’T DECIDE ON NEW PRODUCTS BASED ON CONSUMER SURVEYS “I don't decide on new products based on consumer surveys or something like that. I try to mentally simulate what the end customer would like, that would want this. In the case of Starlink, would people buy low-cost, high-bandwidth, fast Internet? Well, yes, obviously. If you'd listen to surveys, do people want an electric car? There's no way you would start an electric car company because people don't say yes. They're happy with their current car. I think Henry Ford famously said, if you asked people back then what they wanted, they'd say they wanted a faster horse. And they would not have said they wanted an automobile. It's because people don't understand what this new thing is that you're offering. You need to be able to imagine how someone would enjoy the product. If that seems compelling, then I think you should move forward with it.” Source: Cannes Lions, June 2024
1:01

ELON: I DON’T DECIDE ON NEW PRODUCTS BASED ON CONSUMER SURVEYS “I don't decide on new products based on consumer surveys or something like that. I try to mentally simulate what the end customer would like, that would want this. In the case of Starlink, would people buy low-cost, high-bandwidth, fast Internet? Well, yes, obviously. If you'd listen to surveys, do people want an electric car? There's no way you would start an electric car company because people don't say yes. They're happy with their current car. I think Henry Ford famously said, if you asked people back then what they wanted, they'd say they wanted a faster horse. And they would not have said they wanted an automobile. It's because people don't understand what this new thing is that you're offering. You need to be able to imagine how someone would enjoy the product. If that seems compelling, then I think you should move forward with it.” Source: Cannes Lions, June 2024

Mario Nawfal

178,060 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I've been saying it for years, AI is the most important conversation we're having right now. Josh Tyrangiel (Josh) spent a year looking for the people actually using it to save lives, and what he found will change the way you think about this technology forever. Watch/YouTube on X, YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Timestamps 0:00 Josh Tyrangiel Introduction 1:35 This is the most important conversation we are having right now 4:33 Is there an existential threat with the creators of AI? 6:31 Which AI is the best one to use? 8:02 A year from now, are we at agentic AI? 10:11 "You need a human in all AI cases." 12:06 If we have checks and balances in place for AI, will our adversaries do the same? 13:58 Anthropic and the US government relationship 15:14 Common variable on an institution using AI or not 19:18 Should you be worried about AI? 20:32 How would a politician or CEO benefit from this book? 21:49 Humans using the AI, not replaced by AI 25:09 What do you think this will change about how we think about AI? 27:28 Five Words
30:03

I've been saying it for years, AI is the most important conversation we're having right now. Josh Tyrangiel (Josh) spent a year looking for the people actually using it to save lives, and what he found will change the way you think about this technology forever. Watch/YouTube on X, YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Timestamps 0:00 Josh Tyrangiel Introduction 1:35 This is the most important conversation we are having right now 4:33 Is there an existential threat with the creators of AI? 6:31 Which AI is the best one to use? 8:02 A year from now, are we at agentic AI? 10:11 "You need a human in all AI cases." 12:06 If we have checks and balances in place for AI, will our adversaries do the same? 13:58 Anthropic and the US government relationship 15:14 Common variable on an institution using AI or not 19:18 Should you be worried about AI? 20:32 How would a politician or CEO benefit from this book? 21:49 Humans using the AI, not replaced by AI 25:09 What do you think this will change about how we think about AI? 27:28 Five Words

Anthony Scaramucci

15,891 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

TESLA ISN'T JUST AHEAD IN AI, IT'S AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE MORE EFFICIENT THAN THE REST OF THE WORLD "I actually think Tesla is ahead of the rest of the world in intelligence density of AI by an order of magnitude or more This is going to sound like a pretty bold statement, but I know what the intelligence efficiency of the big models are like, Grok and a bunch of the other models Tesla’s AI is, in terms of its memory efficiency, I think more than an order of magnitude better. The Tesla AI is very compute-efficient and very memory-efficient One of the metrics one should consider for any given AI model is the intelligence per gigabyte. Especially when you’re constrained on RAM, having an AI that has very high intelligence density per gigabyte for a given number of gigabytes, how much functionality can you get out of it" - Elon Musk
0:59

TESLA ISN'T JUST AHEAD IN AI, IT'S AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE MORE EFFICIENT THAN THE REST OF THE WORLD "I actually think Tesla is ahead of the rest of the world in intelligence density of AI by an order of magnitude or more This is going to sound like a pretty bold statement, but I know what the intelligence efficiency of the big models are like, Grok and a bunch of the other models Tesla’s AI is, in terms of its memory efficiency, I think more than an order of magnitude better. The Tesla AI is very compute-efficient and very memory-efficient One of the metrics one should consider for any given AI model is the intelligence per gigabyte. Especially when you’re constrained on RAM, having an AI that has very high intelligence density per gigabyte for a given number of gigabytes, how much functionality can you get out of it" - Elon Musk

X Freeze

62,736 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Whenever I tell people when you buy a Tesla, make sure you eat the cost and buy FSD outright, a majority of people always tell me “FSD is too expensive at $8,000,” without actually looking at the data and numbers behind the true value of FSD. Well, I did. Back in 2019, Elon explained the Robotaxi economics very clearly. “What would be the probable gross profit from a single Robotaxi? We think probably something on the order of $30,000 per year.” BTW, this number also came from conservative assumptions. • ~90,000 miles per year • ~50% utilization (half the miles are non-revenue) • Operating cost around $0.18 per mile (fyi, gas cars are closer to $0.60!) • Tesla takes 25-30% of the revenue • Robotaxi designed to last ~1 million miles So after costs, after Tesla’s cut, and after conservative usage, the estimate still came out to $30,000 per year from a single Robotaxi. So let me do the simple math for you. If a Robotaxi generates $30,000 per year, and you assume just 10 years of useful Robotaxi life, even though the car is going to be designed for more: 1/ $30,000 × 10 years = $300,000 Now, let’s cut that number by 50% for uncertainty, downtime, or slower rollout… I’m being conservative here. 2/ $300,000 ÷ 2 = $150,000 That means the FSD value is NOT $8,000. It’s six figures! This is why every Tesla owner should buy FSD outright right now! And is also the reason why Tesla is ending this option in February imo. You see, this is what happens when you see FSD as an income generating business, instead of just a feature. FSD is SIGNIFICANTLY undervalued. And whenever I tell people that I’m going to be the biggest Tesla Robotaxi fleet operator one day and show the world how much $ I’m making for each Robotaxi in operation, they all still laugh at me in disbelief. (I hope Elon and Tesla will let me be one of the first owners when the time comes… 🤞) But I also know that people always doubted me my whole life… until things actually became real. That’s why I’ve never seen my Tesla as just a car that depreciates like other non-Teslas. It’s the exact opposite. And one day, when these cars are driving themselves and generating $ income for me while I’m sleeping, all of the doubters will become silent. Mark my words.
0:46

Whenever I tell people when you buy a Tesla, make sure you eat the cost and buy FSD outright, a majority of people always tell me “FSD is too expensive at $8,000,” without actually looking at the data and numbers behind the true value of FSD. Well, I did. Back in 2019, Elon explained the Robotaxi economics very clearly. “What would be the probable gross profit from a single Robotaxi? We think probably something on the order of $30,000 per year.” BTW, this number also came from conservative assumptions. • ~90,000 miles per year • ~50% utilization (half the miles are non-revenue) • Operating cost around $0.18 per mile (fyi, gas cars are closer to $0.60!) • Tesla takes 25-30% of the revenue • Robotaxi designed to last ~1 million miles So after costs, after Tesla’s cut, and after conservative usage, the estimate still came out to $30,000 per year from a single Robotaxi. So let me do the simple math for you. If a Robotaxi generates $30,000 per year, and you assume just 10 years of useful Robotaxi life, even though the car is going to be designed for more: 1/ $30,000 × 10 years = $300,000 Now, let’s cut that number by 50% for uncertainty, downtime, or slower rollout… I’m being conservative here. 2/ $300,000 ÷ 2 = $150,000 That means the FSD value is NOT $8,000. It’s six figures! This is why every Tesla owner should buy FSD outright right now! And is also the reason why Tesla is ending this option in February imo. You see, this is what happens when you see FSD as an income generating business, instead of just a feature. FSD is SIGNIFICANTLY undervalued. And whenever I tell people that I’m going to be the biggest Tesla Robotaxi fleet operator one day and show the world how much $ I’m making for each Robotaxi in operation, they all still laugh at me in disbelief. (I hope Elon and Tesla will let me be one of the first owners when the time comes… 🤞) But I also know that people always doubted me my whole life… until things actually became real. That’s why I’ve never seen my Tesla as just a car that depreciates like other non-Teslas. It’s the exact opposite. And one day, when these cars are driving themselves and generating $ income for me while I’m sleeping, all of the doubters will become silent. Mark my words.

Teslaconomics

112,667 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Chamath: Tesla and Google are best positioned to win AI because they are building the full-stack Jason: "The game here is who wins the AI prize five years from now?" "Chamath, who's your number one and number two?" Chamath: " Tesla's one and Google's two." "And the reason is because they are the closest to having that vertically integrated stack that I spoke about." TESLA 1⃣ "I think that Tesla has the best vision models." "Now with xAI, they'll have one of the best LLMs and reasoning models." "And they'll be able to eventually stick that on Dojo." "And then all of that will be in all of the physical AI that you will interact with in your daily life." "Whether it's a robot, or whether it's a car, or whether it's a Robotaxi. So that's number one." GOOGLE 2⃣ "And then number two, for many of the same reasons, I think Google." "Because you'll have the Gemini family of models, which just absolutely kick ass." "Like Veo 3, which we haven't really spoke about, is gonna destroy Hollywood in the next year, like Hollywood is done, I think." "But they're landing model after model." "They have the TPU, and the next generation TPU I think is exceptional." "They're baking quantum." "And then they have an entire funnel of billions of people that they can direct experiences to." "So Tesla one, Google two."
1:04

Chamath: Tesla and Google are best positioned to win AI because they are building the full-stack Jason: "The game here is who wins the AI prize five years from now?" "Chamath, who's your number one and number two?" Chamath: " Tesla's one and Google's two." "And the reason is because they are the closest to having that vertically integrated stack that I spoke about." TESLA 1⃣ "I think that Tesla has the best vision models." "Now with xAI, they'll have one of the best LLMs and reasoning models." "And they'll be able to eventually stick that on Dojo." "And then all of that will be in all of the physical AI that you will interact with in your daily life." "Whether it's a robot, or whether it's a car, or whether it's a Robotaxi. So that's number one." GOOGLE 2⃣ "And then number two, for many of the same reasons, I think Google." "Because you'll have the Gemini family of models, which just absolutely kick ass." "Like Veo 3, which we haven't really spoke about, is gonna destroy Hollywood in the next year, like Hollywood is done, I think." "But they're landing model after model." "They have the TPU, and the next generation TPU I think is exceptional." "They're baking quantum." "And then they have an entire funnel of billions of people that they can direct experiences to." "So Tesla one, Google two."

The All-In Podcast

7,918,769 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk: Tesla has no need to buy Uber. “There's no need [to buy Uber] because we have millions of cars that will be able to operate autonomously. And I should say that it's a combination of a Tesla-owned fleet and also enabling Tesla owners to be able to add or subtract their car to the fleet so that existing Tesla owners will be able to earn money by adding their car to the fleet for autonomous use. I think it's maybe possible for Tesla owners to make more in allowing the car to be added to the self-driving fleet then they cost them in the lease. And that's why I'd consider it sort of a business model that's similar to some combination of Airbnb and Uber. Just like Airbnb, you can rent out your spare bedroom or your house if you're not using it and make money on it. And that's what we expect Tesla customers to be able to do.” Interview with David Faber, May 20, 2025 Made and published via
1:01

Elon Musk: Tesla has no need to buy Uber. “There's no need [to buy Uber] because we have millions of cars that will be able to operate autonomously. And I should say that it's a combination of a Tesla-owned fleet and also enabling Tesla owners to be able to add or subtract their car to the fleet so that existing Tesla owners will be able to earn money by adding their car to the fleet for autonomous use. I think it's maybe possible for Tesla owners to make more in allowing the car to be added to the self-driving fleet then they cost them in the lease. And that's why I'd consider it sort of a business model that's similar to some combination of Airbnb and Uber. Just like Airbnb, you can rent out your spare bedroom or your house if you're not using it and make money on it. And that's what we expect Tesla customers to be able to do.” Interview with David Faber, May 20, 2025 Made and published via

ELON CLIPS

440,639 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON: AI BOTS WILL CRUSH SOCIAL MEDIA UNLESS USERS PAY A LITTLE "One of the things we're trying to figure out on the X platform is how to deal with that because it really, we really are at the point where even with open source, readily available AI, you can actually be better than humans at passing these tests. So that’s sort of where we're thinking we might have to charge some very tiny amount of money, 0.30 cents a day effectively, to deal with the onslaught of AI-powered bots. But it will be, I think, perhaps an insurmountable problem next year. And then you have to worry about manipulation of information, making something seem very popular when in fact it is not, because it's getting boosted by likes and reposts from AI-powered bots. So somewhat inevitably it leads to some small payment in order to dramatically increase the cost of a bot. I think probably any social media system that doesn't do that will simply be overrun by bots.” Source: Vocal Vignettes Elon Musk
0:58

ELON: AI BOTS WILL CRUSH SOCIAL MEDIA UNLESS USERS PAY A LITTLE "One of the things we're trying to figure out on the X platform is how to deal with that because it really, we really are at the point where even with open source, readily available AI, you can actually be better than humans at passing these tests. So that’s sort of where we're thinking we might have to charge some very tiny amount of money, 0.30 cents a day effectively, to deal with the onslaught of AI-powered bots. But it will be, I think, perhaps an insurmountable problem next year. And then you have to worry about manipulation of information, making something seem very popular when in fact it is not, because it's getting boosted by likes and reposts from AI-powered bots. So somewhat inevitably it leads to some small payment in order to dramatically increase the cost of a bot. I think probably any social media system that doesn't do that will simply be overrun by bots.” Source: Vocal Vignettes Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

68,426 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten