Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

"I think Trump is just really under Israel's control and he can't get out from under it. The lobby is just too strong and the Jews control so many of our institutions. Even a very large percentage of the MAGA Americans, a lot of them are Christian Zionists. And... they think that America's purpose assigned by God is to defend Israel. And that's the end of it. It doesn't matter what Israel does. I think it's very interesting if Trump is stressing that Saudi Arabia is an American ally, because as you know, the definition of greater Israel, which was from the Nile to the Euphrates, in the last year has been changed twice. At first, it was the Israeli ministers who said that it now includes half of Saudi Arabia. And this is Saudi Arabia looking for some kind of alliance with Pakistan in order to get under the Pakistani nuclear umbrella against Israel. And then more recently, an Israeli minister said, well, actually, Great Israel now includes Pakistan. So it's from the Nile through Pakistan. Well, and I think the Israelis are serious about that, and I think that what goes unmentioned in the news is that the Israelis are continuing to expand in Syria and in Lebanon." Dr. Paul Craig Roberts of 🇺🇸🇮🇱 🔗show more

Geopolitics & Empire

31,904 subscribers

18,329 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Anti-Zionist America PAC founder Michael Rectenwald: "What we're seeing now... is the mask has come off. There was always some [Israeli] influence [in government]... [via] AIPAC and other lobbies, but... under the Trump administration, it's become a full-scale... barrage." This clip of Rectenwald (Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.) is taken from an interview with Hrvoje Morić (Geopolitics & Empire) posted to the Geopolitics & Empire Rumble channel on September 26, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I think what we're seeing now is the mask has come off. There was always some influence certainly and some control by AIPAC and other lobbies, but I think that under the Trump administration it's become a full scale, you know, mask off barrage. "And never before have I seen the US Government become so blatantly and overtly obsequious to the interests of Israel and the people that promote it. So I, I, I would probably say it's year, you know, decades in the coming, but this particular administration, surprisingly, actually to me, I was a bit stunned actually by the level of sort of servility that this government has sunk to in connection with Israel. "And you're right, if it was China, I would be saying the same thing and I would have found that an anti, an anti cp, you know, Communist, party, pack or something like that, or if it was, you know, say Saudi Arabia would be that. So it isn't specifically because it's Israel, it's because it's happening to our government and it happens to be Zionists that are doing it."

Anti-Zionist America PAC founder Michael Rectenwald: "What we're seeing now... is the mask has come off. There was always some [Israeli] influence [in government]... [via] AIPAC and other lobbies, but... under the Trump administration, it's become a full-scale... barrage." This clip of Rectenwald (Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.) is taken from an interview with Hrvoje Morić (Geopolitics & Empire) posted to the Geopolitics & Empire Rumble channel on September 26, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I think what we're seeing now is the mask has come off. There was always some influence certainly and some control by AIPAC and other lobbies, but I think that under the Trump administration it's become a full scale, you know, mask off barrage. "And never before have I seen the US Government become so blatantly and overtly obsequious to the interests of Israel and the people that promote it. So I, I, I would probably say it's year, you know, decades in the coming, but this particular administration, surprisingly, actually to me, I was a bit stunned actually by the level of sort of servility that this government has sunk to in connection with Israel. "And you're right, if it was China, I would be saying the same thing and I would have found that an anti, an anti cp, you know, Communist, party, pack or something like that, or if it was, you know, say Saudi Arabia would be that. So it isn't specifically because it's Israel, it's because it's happening to our government and it happens to be Zionists that are doing it."

Sense Receptor

10,484 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Jiang Xueqin says that this war allows Israel to remake the Middle East in its own image: "If you look at the main beneficiary of this war, it is Israel because Israel has an ambition called the Greater Israel Project." "If you look at what's happening, well, it's convenient in that the GCC is being destroyed." "Saudi Arabia will probably be drawn into this war. It is possible Turkey will be drawn into this war as, as well." "And this war allows Israel to remake the Middle East in its own image." "The main constraint to Israel achieving the Greater Israel Project is actually not Iran, but America, because America guarantees the military safety and protection of the GCC." "And so if Israel is, is becoming dominant... it needs to figure out how to remove America from the equation." "This war has shown the limitations of American power. It's annoyed the American people. The American people do not want this war." "It's very possible that regardless of what happens in this war, America is forced to withdraw from the Middle East, in which case Israel is able to achieve its Greater Israel Project." Tucker Carlson Jiang Xueqin

Jiang Xueqin says that this war allows Israel to remake the Middle East in its own image: "If you look at the main beneficiary of this war, it is Israel because Israel has an ambition called the Greater Israel Project." "If you look at what's happening, well, it's convenient in that the GCC is being destroyed." "Saudi Arabia will probably be drawn into this war. It is possible Turkey will be drawn into this war as, as well." "And this war allows Israel to remake the Middle East in its own image." "The main constraint to Israel achieving the Greater Israel Project is actually not Iran, but America, because America guarantees the military safety and protection of the GCC." "And so if Israel is, is becoming dominant... it needs to figure out how to remove America from the equation." "This war has shown the limitations of American power. It's annoyed the American people. The American people do not want this war." "It's very possible that regardless of what happens in this war, America is forced to withdraw from the Middle East, in which case Israel is able to achieve its Greater Israel Project." Tucker Carlson Jiang Xueqin

Defiant Ghost

21,828 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Israel is not hiding its intentions for 'Promised Land' "I want a Jewish state. Bit by bit. It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus. Until Damascus," said Israeli Finance Minister Smotrich The Greater Israel project would then include the lands of Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey Something similar to this was heard in the late 1930s, and then came the global war. What is going to happen now?

Israel is not hiding its intentions for 'Promised Land' "I want a Jewish state. Bit by bit. It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus. Until Damascus," said Israeli Finance Minister Smotrich The Greater Israel project would then include the lands of Palestine, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey Something similar to this was heard in the late 1930s, and then came the global war. What is going to happen now?

Critical Perspectives

23,663 просмотров • 1 год назад

I explain why the accusation that Israel is committing "genocide" is blood libel. Me: The application of the word genocide to refer to tens of thousands of war deaths is, I mean, I think it is a kind of blood libel. It's trying to import the moral opprobrium that we associate with genocide to a designated enemy, in this case, Israel. I think because I alluded to my side bias, the sides in this case being the sides that a lot of hard left critical theory has defined, namely white oppressors against everyone else's victims. Moynihan: It's pretty strong to say this is like a blood libel. Me: Well, it is a blood libel in the sense that it is an accusation of deliberate murder, ill-founded in that the, and one could disagree with Israel's campaign against Gaza, one could say that this is not justifiable, it's not a just war. It's still different from deliberately murdering as many people as possible, as in, and we know there have been genocides. I think it really is a terrible blood libel, and it's a sign of how people's moralizing in the service of demonizing and dichotomizing, dividing the world into good and evil can just flatten their ability to analyze and to think clearly.

I explain why the accusation that Israel is committing "genocide" is blood libel. Me: The application of the word genocide to refer to tens of thousands of war deaths is, I mean, I think it is a kind of blood libel. It's trying to import the moral opprobrium that we associate with genocide to a designated enemy, in this case, Israel. I think because I alluded to my side bias, the sides in this case being the sides that a lot of hard left critical theory has defined, namely white oppressors against everyone else's victims. Moynihan: It's pretty strong to say this is like a blood libel. Me: Well, it is a blood libel in the sense that it is an accusation of deliberate murder, ill-founded in that the, and one could disagree with Israel's campaign against Gaza, one could say that this is not justifiable, it's not a just war. It's still different from deliberately murdering as many people as possible, as in, and we know there have been genocides. I think it really is a terrible blood libel, and it's a sign of how people's moralizing in the service of demonizing and dichotomizing, dividing the world into good and evil can just flatten their ability to analyze and to think clearly.

Steven Pinker

392,505 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Remember when Julian Assange exposed Hillary Clinton was funding ISIS — Al Qaeda? "There's an early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton, so not so long after she left Secretary of State, to her campaign manager, John Podesta. That email, it states that ISIL, ISIS, is funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This is a, I actually, I think this is the most significant email in the whole collection, and perhaps because Saudi and Qatari money is spread all over the place, including into many media institutions. All serious analysts know, even the US government has mentioned or agreed that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS, funding ISIS. But the dodge has always been that it's just some rogue princes, using their cut of the oil money to do what they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that no, it is the governments of Saudi and the government and Qatar that have been funding ISIS. The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the Saudis and the Qataris, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation, while Hillary Clinton is Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia. Under Hillary Clinton, and Clinton emails reveal a significant discussion about it, the largest ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia, more than $80 billion. In fact, during her tenure as Secretary of State, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value doubled. And of course, the consequence of that is that this notorious terrorist jihadist group called ISIL or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation." Our entire government betrayed us over and over again.

Remember when Julian Assange exposed Hillary Clinton was funding ISIS — Al Qaeda? "There's an early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton, so not so long after she left Secretary of State, to her campaign manager, John Podesta. That email, it states that ISIL, ISIS, is funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This is a, I actually, I think this is the most significant email in the whole collection, and perhaps because Saudi and Qatari money is spread all over the place, including into many media institutions. All serious analysts know, even the US government has mentioned or agreed that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS, funding ISIS. But the dodge has always been that it's just some rogue princes, using their cut of the oil money to do what they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that no, it is the governments of Saudi and the government and Qatar that have been funding ISIS. The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the Saudis and the Qataris, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation, while Hillary Clinton is Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia. Under Hillary Clinton, and Clinton emails reveal a significant discussion about it, the largest ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia, more than $80 billion. In fact, during her tenure as Secretary of State, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value doubled. And of course, the consequence of that is that this notorious terrorist jihadist group called ISIL or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation." Our entire government betrayed us over and over again.

Bridgett Fertig

45,478 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Former IDF Spox Jonathan Conricus: I think what Israel has done again is kind of shuffle the cards, and hopefully sent a message to terrorists, their supporters and countries that think about harboring terrorists, that even if you’ve been a beneficiary of the U.S. for a long time, and even if you think that you are untouchable—like you’re a made man in the mafia—you’re not. And if you harbor evil terrorists that kill Israeli civilians and try to kill additional Israeli civilians, and claim that you want to wage jihad until the last Jew is dead in Israel, then you are a target no matter where you are. It’s a matter of a political decision, because the military capabilities exist; Israel has the intel and the ordnance delivery capabilities. And I think what Israel did now is indicate that we are serious and we are going to deliver justice to each and every senior terrorist of value that threatens Israel. I think that’s a very important message. I hope that all terrorists and other state supporters of terrorism are paying notice. I would wish that the Turks would stop housing and supporting Hamas, because that looks like the next episode. Maybe far away, but it looks like kind of the next episode in this saga, and I would rather avoid it. But I think Israel is determined to really shift its posture here in the Middle East and not agree to have its civilians slaughtered like they were on October 7th, and to do everything necessary in order to prevent it—even if it is things that people will find offensive and will criticize Israel for doing. Mario Nawfal Jonathan Conricus John Kiriakou

Former IDF Spox Jonathan Conricus: I think what Israel has done again is kind of shuffle the cards, and hopefully sent a message to terrorists, their supporters and countries that think about harboring terrorists, that even if you’ve been a beneficiary of the U.S. for a long time, and even if you think that you are untouchable—like you’re a made man in the mafia—you’re not. And if you harbor evil terrorists that kill Israeli civilians and try to kill additional Israeli civilians, and claim that you want to wage jihad until the last Jew is dead in Israel, then you are a target no matter where you are. It’s a matter of a political decision, because the military capabilities exist; Israel has the intel and the ordnance delivery capabilities. And I think what Israel did now is indicate that we are serious and we are going to deliver justice to each and every senior terrorist of value that threatens Israel. I think that’s a very important message. I hope that all terrorists and other state supporters of terrorism are paying notice. I would wish that the Turks would stop housing and supporting Hamas, because that looks like the next episode. Maybe far away, but it looks like kind of the next episode in this saga, and I would rather avoid it. But I think Israel is determined to really shift its posture here in the Middle East and not agree to have its civilians slaughtered like they were on October 7th, and to do everything necessary in order to prevent it—even if it is things that people will find offensive and will criticize Israel for doing. Mario Nawfal Jonathan Conricus John Kiriakou

dan linnaeus

73,647 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

BREAKING:🚨 Air Commodore (Retd.) Khalid Chishti: “Pakistan Air Force jets and military deployment in Saudi Arabia are strictly under the defence pact between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia which was signed soon after Israel attacked Qatar. The current deployment is in the same context, against a common enemy, and not against any Muslim country. The presence of the Pakistan Army and PAF in Saudi Arabia is purely for the protection of Saudi Arabia and not for any offensive purpose. Pakistan has given assurance to Iran at highest level that the step is taken for security for KSA. Those propagating among our Iranian brothers that Pakistan Army and PAF are there for any action against Iran are spreading absolutely false propaganda. I am saying this after consulting top ranks of the Pakistan Air Force.” Khalid Chishti #FaislaAapKa TEAM | Hum News

BREAKING:🚨 Air Commodore (Retd.) Khalid Chishti: “Pakistan Air Force jets and military deployment in Saudi Arabia are strictly under the defence pact between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia which was signed soon after Israel attacked Qatar. The current deployment is in the same context, against a common enemy, and not against any Muslim country. The presence of the Pakistan Army and PAF in Saudi Arabia is purely for the protection of Saudi Arabia and not for any offensive purpose. Pakistan has given assurance to Iran at highest level that the step is taken for security for KSA. Those propagating among our Iranian brothers that Pakistan Army and PAF are there for any action against Iran are spreading absolutely false propaganda. I am saying this after consulting top ranks of the Pakistan Air Force.” Khalid Chishti #FaislaAapKa TEAM | Hum News

Asma Shirazi

14,476 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Tel Aviv, Israel: On Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif's tweet, Eylon Levy, former Israeli government spokesman, says, "The Pakistani Defence Minister's statement is outrageous and completely unacceptable. Israel is interpreting it, rightly, as a call for the annihilation of our country by a nuclear-armed state. This is reminding a lot of Israelis what most Indians know, which is that Pakistan is not a good-faith actor. It is an aggressive state that systematically supports terrorism. It is not a good-faith mediator in these negotiations with Iran. It is an ally of Iran that is trying to build a radical Islamic axis that will threaten Israel and India alike. I think Indians should be deeply concerned about the increased role that Pakistan is getting internationally from the mediation of the talks with Iran. It is setting a very dangerous precedent that is turning Pakistan into a global power broker and peacemaker in a way that is going to lead countries to throw their support behind Pakistan, to dismiss India's own security concerns, where we know now the mask has come off. This is a country with nuclear weapons that is openly calling for the destruction of Israel and, of course, has subjected India to so much of that support for terrorism and aggression in the past."

#WATCH | Tel Aviv, Israel: On Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif's tweet, Eylon Levy, former Israeli government spokesman, says, "The Pakistani Defence Minister's statement is outrageous and completely unacceptable. Israel is interpreting it, rightly, as a call for the annihilation of our country by a nuclear-armed state. This is reminding a lot of Israelis what most Indians know, which is that Pakistan is not a good-faith actor. It is an aggressive state that systematically supports terrorism. It is not a good-faith mediator in these negotiations with Iran. It is an ally of Iran that is trying to build a radical Islamic axis that will threaten Israel and India alike. I think Indians should be deeply concerned about the increased role that Pakistan is getting internationally from the mediation of the talks with Iran. It is setting a very dangerous precedent that is turning Pakistan into a global power broker and peacemaker in a way that is going to lead countries to throw their support behind Pakistan, to dismiss India's own security concerns, where we know now the mask has come off. This is a country with nuclear weapons that is openly calling for the destruction of Israel and, of course, has subjected India to so much of that support for terrorism and aggression in the past."

ANI

39,151 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This is Michael Knowles calling Zionism a relatively new innovation that started out secular. “‘If you think that Israel has a right to exist, then you are a Zionist.’ But I don’t think that claim is exactly true…The traditional Christian perspective is that the New Testament is the fulfillment of the Old Testament, and the Church is the new Israel, the spiritual Israel, and so these kind of specific ethnic claims that come out of the Old Testament, they don’t really hold true…There is a kind of innovation that comes about in the 19th century focused on returning Jews specifically to the homeland…” Every time I think I start to have a grasp on the theological question of Israel, someone I respect and admire (like Michael) argues the opposite—and kind of effectively. I don’t think there is any one topic that currently confuses me more than this one, because people say literally opposite things—and all of them self-professed Christians.

This is Michael Knowles calling Zionism a relatively new innovation that started out secular. “‘If you think that Israel has a right to exist, then you are a Zionist.’ But I don’t think that claim is exactly true…The traditional Christian perspective is that the New Testament is the fulfillment of the Old Testament, and the Church is the new Israel, the spiritual Israel, and so these kind of specific ethnic claims that come out of the Old Testament, they don’t really hold true…There is a kind of innovation that comes about in the 19th century focused on returning Jews specifically to the homeland…” Every time I think I start to have a grasp on the theological question of Israel, someone I respect and admire (like Michael) argues the opposite—and kind of effectively. I don’t think there is any one topic that currently confuses me more than this one, because people say literally opposite things—and all of them self-professed Christians.

Natalie Jean Beisner

16,188 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: VP JD Vance announces Israel has offered to LET OFF strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon if it helps peace arrangements between Iran and the US "I think this comes from a legitimate misunderstanding. I think the Iranians thought that the ceasefire included Lebanon and it just didn't. We never made that promise!" "The Israelis, as I understand it...have actually offered to check themselves a little bit in Lebanon because they want to make sure that our negotiation is successful." "That's not because that is part of the ceasefire. I think that's the Israelis try to set up us up for success and we'll, of course, see how that unfolds in the next few days."

🚨 BREAKING: VP JD Vance announces Israel has offered to LET OFF strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon if it helps peace arrangements between Iran and the US "I think this comes from a legitimate misunderstanding. I think the Iranians thought that the ceasefire included Lebanon and it just didn't. We never made that promise!" "The Israelis, as I understand it...have actually offered to check themselves a little bit in Lebanon because they want to make sure that our negotiation is successful." "That's not because that is part of the ceasefire. I think that's the Israelis try to set up us up for success and we'll, of course, see how that unfolds in the next few days."

Eric Daugherty

312,829 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,056 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

AOC on the biggest foreign policy change in America: " Well, I think zooming out beyond just this presidential administration, I think that what we are seeing is between President trump's first administration pulling out of longstanding international agreements, then you have President Biden who is opting in back into some of them, such E.G., with the Paris Climate Accords, um. And then you have President Trump that's elected again. I think what we are seeing now is this idea that US foreign policy is and some of our more basic and foundational values, based commitments seem to be enacted based on the partisanship of whoever is elected. That we play hokey pokey with USAID, with the Paris Climate Agreement, with ah, with many of our commitments, and I don't think that that is good for the country. Ah, I think that what is best is for when we sign an agreement and when we're a part of it, we stay in it, um, so that they know that our commitments are reflective of our nation's values in a way that transcends, ah, partisanship. And so I think that instability is one, but then the other. I think it it, it is hand in hand with the volatility. On one hand, it goes far beyond just agreements, and it goes into real aberrations. I think are in in interventionism, I think, a turning back on our commitment on human rights, um, as well as super charging an economic regime that fuels the 1 % um. And I think that that that piece is the most concerning for everyday people."

AOC on the biggest foreign policy change in America: " Well, I think zooming out beyond just this presidential administration, I think that what we are seeing is between President trump's first administration pulling out of longstanding international agreements, then you have President Biden who is opting in back into some of them, such E.G., with the Paris Climate Accords, um. And then you have President Trump that's elected again. I think what we are seeing now is this idea that US foreign policy is and some of our more basic and foundational values, based commitments seem to be enacted based on the partisanship of whoever is elected. That we play hokey pokey with USAID, with the Paris Climate Agreement, with ah, with many of our commitments, and I don't think that that is good for the country. Ah, I think that what is best is for when we sign an agreement and when we're a part of it, we stay in it, um, so that they know that our commitments are reflective of our nation's values in a way that transcends, ah, partisanship. And so I think that instability is one, but then the other. I think it it, it is hand in hand with the volatility. On one hand, it goes far beyond just agreements, and it goes into real aberrations. I think are in in interventionism, I think, a turning back on our commitment on human rights, um, as well as super charging an economic regime that fuels the 1 % um. And I think that that that piece is the most concerning for everyday people."

Winter

40,728 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Max Igan, interview posted Sept. 11, 2025: "Israel... controls the U.S. now. Benjamin Netanyahu said...we are... in possession of a superpower because Israel now... controls the U.S. Everything Donald Trump is doing, he's doing for Israel...But...people are waking up to this" This clip of Igan (Max Igan), "an author, filmmaker, musician, podcaster, and researcher originally from Australia who has garnered a large following for his work over the years speaking truth to power," is taken from an interview with Hrvoje Morić (Geopolitics & Empire) posted to the Geopolitics & Empire Rumble channel on September 11, 2025. (Igan's CV is per the G&E video description.) ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Israel basically controls the United States now. Benjamin Netanyahu said about three months ago, we are now in possession of a superpower because Israel now completely controls the United States. Everything Donald Trump is doing, he's doing for Israel. "And this is, this is the largest weapon manufacturers and the biggest military on earth. So, you know, if you speak out against Israel and then the United States puts sanctions on you and you know, all sorts of stuff. So this is kind of what's happening and where we're going. "But a lot of people are waking up to this now as well. So, you know, as negative as it gets, I mean, I've often said that, people will let this happen. You won't see any real pushback until it comes to people's own backyard. And now in the United States, it's coming to their own backyard. "The state of America. You've been to America recently? It's like the Third World. It's incredible. Philadelphia, you know, even in Manhattan there's piles of garbage everywhere. And la, like burnt out half of la. The other they go to San Diego, the whole center of town smells like urine. It's incredible. Homeless people all over the place. And it's like the Third World. Everyone, America is presented as this fantastic thing on tv, but when you go there and see what it's become over the last 20 years, if you go there and a lot like I go there quite a bit, and over the last 20 years I've seen it deteriorate to the point that it's shocking. It's absolutely shocking. "A lot of the people within the United States simply can't see it because they're there and amongst it, you know. But, it's shocking. And I've often said the only way you're going to bring down America, you can't wage a war against America because everyone's armed. You can't invade the place. If it's going to be destroyed, it's got to be destroyed from within, which is what is happening. All of the dual Israeli citizens in government. There's a new organization formed called AZAPAC, which is the, it's like AIPAC, only it's the anti-Zionist committee. "So that's all formed in the United States. And a lot of pushback. There's a lot of pushback happening and that might be the way out, I mean, through public awareness. I mean, once it gets so bad that you can't help but see it and you realize that all of this has been legislated to happen, you know, the only thing that stops the people pushing back and making the United States great again is the government and the police. So perhaps we need to address that, you know, and it's the same in every country. So, you know, for all of the negative stuff that's going on. "You get to the point where you think, well, you know, we're almost past the point of no return. I still see it as a positive because you can't not see it now. And, I think we are going to see some major pushback. It's going to get a lot uglier yet, but I think through it, I think we're going to head to some freedom after this."

Max Igan, interview posted Sept. 11, 2025: "Israel... controls the U.S. now. Benjamin Netanyahu said...we are... in possession of a superpower because Israel now... controls the U.S. Everything Donald Trump is doing, he's doing for Israel...But...people are waking up to this" This clip of Igan (Max Igan), "an author, filmmaker, musician, podcaster, and researcher originally from Australia who has garnered a large following for his work over the years speaking truth to power," is taken from an interview with Hrvoje Morić (Geopolitics & Empire) posted to the Geopolitics & Empire Rumble channel on September 11, 2025. (Igan's CV is per the G&E video description.) ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Israel basically controls the United States now. Benjamin Netanyahu said about three months ago, we are now in possession of a superpower because Israel now completely controls the United States. Everything Donald Trump is doing, he's doing for Israel. "And this is, this is the largest weapon manufacturers and the biggest military on earth. So, you know, if you speak out against Israel and then the United States puts sanctions on you and you know, all sorts of stuff. So this is kind of what's happening and where we're going. "But a lot of people are waking up to this now as well. So, you know, as negative as it gets, I mean, I've often said that, people will let this happen. You won't see any real pushback until it comes to people's own backyard. And now in the United States, it's coming to their own backyard. "The state of America. You've been to America recently? It's like the Third World. It's incredible. Philadelphia, you know, even in Manhattan there's piles of garbage everywhere. And la, like burnt out half of la. The other they go to San Diego, the whole center of town smells like urine. It's incredible. Homeless people all over the place. And it's like the Third World. Everyone, America is presented as this fantastic thing on tv, but when you go there and see what it's become over the last 20 years, if you go there and a lot like I go there quite a bit, and over the last 20 years I've seen it deteriorate to the point that it's shocking. It's absolutely shocking. "A lot of the people within the United States simply can't see it because they're there and amongst it, you know. But, it's shocking. And I've often said the only way you're going to bring down America, you can't wage a war against America because everyone's armed. You can't invade the place. If it's going to be destroyed, it's got to be destroyed from within, which is what is happening. All of the dual Israeli citizens in government. There's a new organization formed called AZAPAC, which is the, it's like AIPAC, only it's the anti-Zionist committee. "So that's all formed in the United States. And a lot of pushback. There's a lot of pushback happening and that might be the way out, I mean, through public awareness. I mean, once it gets so bad that you can't help but see it and you realize that all of this has been legislated to happen, you know, the only thing that stops the people pushing back and making the United States great again is the government and the police. So perhaps we need to address that, you know, and it's the same in every country. So, you know, for all of the negative stuff that's going on. "You get to the point where you think, well, you know, we're almost past the point of no return. I still see it as a positive because you can't not see it now. And, I think we are going to see some major pushback. It's going to get a lot uglier yet, but I think through it, I think we're going to head to some freedom after this."

Sense Receptor

43,911 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) traces the creation of Israel directly to the City of London and the British Round Table networks that later became Chatham House. Designed from the 1870s as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier,” it was intended to keep the Middle East in permanent instability so Britain could control the surrounding states. That same power principle later made the petrodollar system possible. Current events in Western Asia were scripted in advance by the British intelligence establishment, including the removal of Nicolás Maduro before any move on Iran. The United States is treated as a disposable proxy. The new Pakistan-Saudi-Turkey alliance is aimed at expelling the United States, Britain and Israel from the region. All of it traces back to the City of London’s long-standing design. “Everything that we’re seeing unfold in the world today, particularly in Western Asia—in the Middle East—has been almost perfectly scripted by the British intelligence establishment, including the need to take out Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela before going to Iran—even that was in [the British think tank Policy Exchange’s major report titled The Iran Question and British Strategy]. Somehow this same network of power managed to maneuver Trump into this humiliating defeat. Of course they don’t care about Trump, and they don’t care about the United States. For them, it is just another proxy war. The United States is being used as a proxy. The glue that holds all this together is the petrodollar, because it takes a lot of money to get all these people to do things for you. You might need a couple of billion to bail Donald Trump out of bankruptcy, make him whole so that he can run for office. Then you say: you actually owe us a couple of favors and we have all this kompromat on you. Consider the choice between silver and lead. Work with us, and it could be very good for you and your family. Work against us, and it would be deadly for you and your family. That might be the way Trump was turned around. Even if Trump was trying to do something more clever, even if there was some sincerity about his declared intentions to pull away from the Middle East, to withdraw troops from Iraq, Syria and Germany, those things have all been thrown overboard. Iran has achieved a strategic victory over the United States. The brand-new alliance announced between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey is not, as some claim, a co-option by Washington to defend Israel. The purpose of the alliance is to back up the eviction of the United States, Great Britain and Israel from the region. What do these three countries have in common? All three have been threatened by Israel. Israel has massive territorial ambitions against Saudi Arabia—a huge chunk of Saudi Arabia would form part of Greater Israel. Saudi Arabia does not have the power to resist by itself. Israeli officials have been threatening war against Turkey for months. Before the war against Iran, Israeli officials were on record saying that once they were done with Iran, Pakistan was next. None of these countries has any interest in wasting resources defending Israel. The Israeli leadership is now acting in such an irrational way that they believe they can do anything—seven-front wars, an eighth, a ninth, a tenth. It does not matter because they are God’s chosen people and everybody else is stupid. They can bring the big dumb giant United States to fight their wars for them infinitely with no restrictions. The sky is the limit. They will just kill everybody they don’t like and create the world they desire, in which they are the ruling elite and everybody else serves them. There are people who actually believe this, and they are very close to the seat of power in Israel. I just want to connect Israel again to the headquarters of the operation, which is the City of London. Some people will say the Zionist Jewish donors in the United States have a lot of money so they can influence politics. But don’t the Russians have a lot of money? The Chinese have a lot of money. The Japanese have a lot of money. The Arabs have a lot of money. The Indians have a lot of money. So how come this tiny little parasite in the Levant gets to control British foreign policy, ostensibly, American foreign policy, German foreign policy and so forth? How can that possibly be? We also know that the preparations for the creation of the state of Israel go back to at least the 1870s. We also know that Israel was completely the creation of the British Empire, with a lot of foresight, because the members of the Round Table that became the Royal Society and has now become Chatham House—still one of the most powerful think tanks in Great Britain—understood the requirement. Alumni of that organization in the 1920s or 1930s gave an interview to the Manchester Guardian and said that in order for Great Britain to remain a global maritime empire they needed to control the Middle East, and to do that they needed to seed the region with a ‘particularly patriotic stock.’ That was the code word for Zionist Jews, as opposed to Arabs who were notoriously disunited and difficult to control and difficult to wield. So they decided to create a Jewish state. It was going to be their unsinkable aircraft carrier in the region, busy destabilizing the region in perpetuity so that they could control all the countries around Israel politically. That has been the reality even longer than the petrodollar. That is the power principle that made the petrodollar possible, and the petrodollar is how we got the whole world trading in US dollars—and most of those dollars flow to money-center banks outside of the United States through an elaborate system of money laundering and these private contractors, charities, NGOs and so forth.” Israel was engineered by the British oligarchy as a permanent instrument of regional control. That same architecture underpins the petrodollar system still in force today.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

21,972 просмотров • 18 дней назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 COL. MACGREGOR: “THIS COULD RAPIDLY RUN OUT OF CONTROL” Ret. U.S. Army Colonel, Douglas Macgregor: "Israel is by comparison with Iran, a postage stamp. I don't think Israel would be doing what it's doing right now if it wasn't reasonably confident that it has control of the White House and the Congress. Trump must surely understand that if we become directly involved, the temptation for many other states to do so is overwhelming. Russia and China, as well as… virtually all the Muslim states in the region. I think the Israelis thought that they could bully Iran more easily… they miscalculated. Iran has recovered, it's growing stronger. This is going to get worse, not better."

🇺🇸🇮🇷 COL. MACGREGOR: “THIS COULD RAPIDLY RUN OUT OF CONTROL” Ret. U.S. Army Colonel, Douglas Macgregor: "Israel is by comparison with Iran, a postage stamp. I don't think Israel would be doing what it's doing right now if it wasn't reasonably confident that it has control of the White House and the Congress. Trump must surely understand that if we become directly involved, the temptation for many other states to do so is overwhelming. Russia and China, as well as… virtually all the Muslim states in the region. I think the Israelis thought that they could bully Iran more easily… they miscalculated. Iran has recovered, it's growing stronger. This is going to get worse, not better."

Mario Nawfal

172,842 просмотров • 1 год назад

Remember when Julian Assange exposed Hillary Clinton was funding ISIS — Al Qaeda? This will become relevent again very soon! "There's an early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton, so not so long after she left Secretary of State, to her campaign manager, John Podesta. That email, it states that ISIL, ISIS, is funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This is a, I actually, I think this is the most significant email in the whole collection, and perhaps because Saudi and Qatari money is spread all over the place, including into many media institutions. All serious analysts know, even the US government has mentioned or agreed that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS, funding ISIS. But the dodge has always been that it's just some rogue princes, using their cut of the oil money to do what they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that no, it is the governments of Saudi and the government and Qatar that have been funding ISIS. The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the Saudis and the Qataris, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation, while Hillary Clinton is Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia. Under Hillary Clinton, and Clinton emails reveal a significant discussion about it, the largest ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia, more than $80 billion. In fact, during her tenure as Secretary of State, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value doubled. And of course, the consequence of that is that this notorious terrorist jihadist group called ISIL or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation." Our entire government betrayed us over and over again and now they're betraying President Trump from trying to reverse everything they've purposefully done to destroy America.

Remember when Julian Assange exposed Hillary Clinton was funding ISIS — Al Qaeda? This will become relevent again very soon! "There's an early 2014 email from Hillary Clinton, so not so long after she left Secretary of State, to her campaign manager, John Podesta. That email, it states that ISIL, ISIS, is funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. This is a, I actually, I think this is the most significant email in the whole collection, and perhaps because Saudi and Qatari money is spread all over the place, including into many media institutions. All serious analysts know, even the US government has mentioned or agreed that some Saudi figures have been supporting ISIS, funding ISIS. But the dodge has always been that it's just some rogue princes, using their cut of the oil money to do what they like, but actually the government disapproves. But that email says that no, it is the governments of Saudi and the government and Qatar that have been funding ISIS. The Saudis, the Qataris, the Moroccans, the Bahrainis, particularly the Saudis and the Qataris, are giving all this money to the Clinton Foundation, while Hillary Clinton is Secretary of State and the State Department is approving massive arms sales, particularly to Saudi Arabia. Under Hillary Clinton, and Clinton emails reveal a significant discussion about it, the largest ever arms deal in the world was made with Saudi Arabia, more than $80 billion. In fact, during her tenure as Secretary of State, total arms exports from the United States in terms of the dollar value doubled. And of course, the consequence of that is that this notorious terrorist jihadist group called ISIL or ISIS is created largely with money from the very people who are giving money to the Clinton Foundation." Our entire government betrayed us over and over again and now they're betraying President Trump from trying to reverse everything they've purposefully done to destroy America.

Bridgett Fertig

44,318 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Elon Musk: The goal of Hamas was to provoke an overreaction from Israel. I recommend Israel engage in the most conspicuous acts of kindness possible. “The goal of Hamas was to provoke an overreaction from Israel. They obviously did not expect to have a military victory, but they really wanted to commit the worst atrocities that they could in order to provoke the most aggressive response possible from Israel and then leverage that aggressive response to rally Muslims worldwide for the cause of Gaza and Palestine, which they have succeeded in doing. The counterintuitive thing here, the thing that I think should be done, even though it is very difficult, is that I would recommend that Israel engage in the most conspicuous acts of kindness possible. Everything. That is the actual thing that would thwart the goal of Hamas. I think it is appropriate for Israel to find the Hamas members and either kill them or incarcerate them. Something has to be done because they're just going to keep coming, otherwise. There's some talk of establishing, for example, a mobile hospital. I'd recommend doing that. Just making sure that there's food, water, medical necessities and just be over the top about it and be very transparent so people can't claim it's a trick. Just put a webcam on the thing, 24/7. Conspicuous acts of kindness that are unequivocal. Because Hamas will then, their response will be, oh, it's a trick, therefore you have to counter [that and show] how it is not a trick.” Interview with Lex Fridman, November 9, 2023

Elon Musk: The goal of Hamas was to provoke an overreaction from Israel. I recommend Israel engage in the most conspicuous acts of kindness possible. “The goal of Hamas was to provoke an overreaction from Israel. They obviously did not expect to have a military victory, but they really wanted to commit the worst atrocities that they could in order to provoke the most aggressive response possible from Israel and then leverage that aggressive response to rally Muslims worldwide for the cause of Gaza and Palestine, which they have succeeded in doing. The counterintuitive thing here, the thing that I think should be done, even though it is very difficult, is that I would recommend that Israel engage in the most conspicuous acts of kindness possible. Everything. That is the actual thing that would thwart the goal of Hamas. I think it is appropriate for Israel to find the Hamas members and either kill them or incarcerate them. Something has to be done because they're just going to keep coming, otherwise. There's some talk of establishing, for example, a mobile hospital. I'd recommend doing that. Just making sure that there's food, water, medical necessities and just be over the top about it and be very transparent so people can't claim it's a trick. Just put a webcam on the thing, 24/7. Conspicuous acts of kindness that are unequivocal. Because Hamas will then, their response will be, oh, it's a trick, therefore you have to counter [that and show] how it is not a trick.” Interview with Lex Fridman, November 9, 2023

ELON CLIPS

31,191 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Lindsey Graham admits the true purpose of removing the current Iranian regime is that its collapse could prompt Saudi Arabia to recognize Israel as the Jewish state, as Saudi Arabia is considered the center of Islam. Graham says the two holy cities of Islam in Saudi Arabia, Mecca and Medina, will eventually have to recognize Israel. This is all part of the Greater Israel Project.

Lindsey Graham admits the true purpose of removing the current Iranian regime is that its collapse could prompt Saudi Arabia to recognize Israel as the Jewish state, as Saudi Arabia is considered the center of Islam. Graham says the two holy cities of Islam in Saudi Arabia, Mecca and Medina, will eventually have to recognize Israel. This is all part of the Greater Israel Project.

Shadow of Ezra

463,665 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨In a 1990 interview, former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan described Congress as “Israeli-occupied territory.” As a result, he was viciously attacked by the corporate press and the political leadership of both parties, demonstrating beyond all doubt that he was correct in his observation. Today, the Israel Lobby in the United States is far more powerful than it was in 1990, so much so that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu actually boasts to his voters that he directs U.S. policy. You've also said that Congress is an Israeli occupied territory. Now, what do you mean by that? I said on the McLaughlin group, in response to a question, Jim, they said, do you think that the Congress of the United States will resist this demand for further aid? I said, threw out a crack. I'd heard. I said, no, the Congress of the United States is israeli occupied territory. What I meant by that is the most powerful lobby in Washington which Congress can't stand up to. One of the most powerful is certainly the pro Israeli lobby. It has gotten its way in this town year in and year out. And I don't think the automatic votes of the Congress of the United States for three and $4 billion worth of aid to Israel are necessarily in the national interest of the United States. And that comment, which is to ridicule the subservience of the Congress of the United States, is perfectly valid. I do not believe my government should subsidize Israeli socialism, which we have done. And I do not believe we should subsidize a policy on the west bank of the Jordan river which denies the palestinian people rights, which I support from Lithuania to Croatia. But if I also believe that Pat Buchanan is entitled to stand up and speak out against any kind of political lobby, whether it's the greek lobby, aid for Greece, or whether it's the pro israeli lobby, aid for Israel without being called vile names. And you think that's what's happened to you? Let me tell you something, Jim. When this little flap is 18 months old, I made this crack. I know Buckley's talking about an 18 month old column. Let's forget that. When this broke, I made that wiseacre crack about the amen corner. It was wiseacre, and it was very funny. You know what happened as a consequence of that? People called my newspapers that carried my column and said, drop Buchanan. AIPAC listed five conservative colonists who were accepted. No, the pro israeli lobby. The pro Israeli lobby. I went out to speak in the country and a little girl from the junior league said, I get these horrible calls from New York about you people. There are individuals who are pro Israeli, go around the country and speak in synagogues and say, call CNN and get Pat Buchanan taken off the air. Those kinds of tactics, in my judgment, are un american. They are done in the name of the First Amendment and they violate the spirit of the First Amendment. You know me. I've been in this town for 25 years, 30 years. I am controversial. I am sometimes insensitive. I am tough and I am hard. But I think that this type of thing is beyond the pale.

🚨In a 1990 interview, former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan described Congress as “Israeli-occupied territory.” As a result, he was viciously attacked by the corporate press and the political leadership of both parties, demonstrating beyond all doubt that he was correct in his observation. Today, the Israel Lobby in the United States is far more powerful than it was in 1990, so much so that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu actually boasts to his voters that he directs U.S. policy. You've also said that Congress is an Israeli occupied territory. Now, what do you mean by that? I said on the McLaughlin group, in response to a question, Jim, they said, do you think that the Congress of the United States will resist this demand for further aid? I said, threw out a crack. I'd heard. I said, no, the Congress of the United States is israeli occupied territory. What I meant by that is the most powerful lobby in Washington which Congress can't stand up to. One of the most powerful is certainly the pro Israeli lobby. It has gotten its way in this town year in and year out. And I don't think the automatic votes of the Congress of the United States for three and $4 billion worth of aid to Israel are necessarily in the national interest of the United States. And that comment, which is to ridicule the subservience of the Congress of the United States, is perfectly valid. I do not believe my government should subsidize Israeli socialism, which we have done. And I do not believe we should subsidize a policy on the west bank of the Jordan river which denies the palestinian people rights, which I support from Lithuania to Croatia. But if I also believe that Pat Buchanan is entitled to stand up and speak out against any kind of political lobby, whether it's the greek lobby, aid for Greece, or whether it's the pro israeli lobby, aid for Israel without being called vile names. And you think that's what's happened to you? Let me tell you something, Jim. When this little flap is 18 months old, I made this crack. I know Buckley's talking about an 18 month old column. Let's forget that. When this broke, I made that wiseacre crack about the amen corner. It was wiseacre, and it was very funny. You know what happened as a consequence of that? People called my newspapers that carried my column and said, drop Buchanan. AIPAC listed five conservative colonists who were accepted. No, the pro israeli lobby. The pro Israeli lobby. I went out to speak in the country and a little girl from the junior league said, I get these horrible calls from New York about you people. There are individuals who are pro Israeli, go around the country and speak in synagogues and say, call CNN and get Pat Buchanan taken off the air. Those kinds of tactics, in my judgment, are un american. They are done in the name of the First Amendment and they violate the spirit of the First Amendment. You know me. I've been in this town for 25 years, 30 years. I am controversial. I am sometimes insensitive. I am tough and I am hard. But I think that this type of thing is beyond the pale.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

16,646 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад