Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This is Michael Knowles calling Zionism a relatively new innovation that started out secular. “‘If you think that Israel has a right to exist, then you are a Zionist.’ But I don’t think that claim is exactly true…The traditional Christian perspective is that the New Testament is the fulfillment...

NJBeisner's profile picture

Natalie Jean Beisner

113,688 subscribers

15,385 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I’ll see your Tucker Carlson theological take on Israel and raise you a John MacArthur truth bomb. “There is a Christian kind of popular doctrine that I reject with all my heart and that is that the church has replaced Israel in the promises of God. It’s called supersessionism. I don’t believe in that…I honestly think that it’s a latent form of antisemitism to say that.”
0:51

I’ll see your Tucker Carlson theological take on Israel and raise you a John MacArthur truth bomb. “There is a Christian kind of popular doctrine that I reject with all my heart and that is that the church has replaced Israel in the promises of God. It’s called supersessionism. I don’t believe in that…I honestly think that it’s a latent form of antisemitism to say that.”

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

287,465 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.Michael Knowles says Christianity is "the fulfillment of the Old Testament. The early Christians read the Old Testament as a figure of the New Testament. David is a figure of Christ, Jonah and the whale is a figure of the Resurrection, the ark of the covenant is a figure of Mary. We believe that to understand the Old Testament, you have to read it in light of the New Testament. This is a wonderful thing, obviously, and this is why we want the Jews to convert. BUT - we also don't go out of our way to harass the Jews. The Church Fathers all the way up to Aquinas point out there's actually something beautiful in the unfolding of providence that the Jews persist. You don't see a lot of Zoroastrians hanging around anymore, or Hittites & Canaanites." We reflect on the Church's historic and continued relationship to Judaism 👇
7:04

.Michael Knowles says Christianity is "the fulfillment of the Old Testament. The early Christians read the Old Testament as a figure of the New Testament. David is a figure of Christ, Jonah and the whale is a figure of the Resurrection, the ark of the covenant is a figure of Mary. We believe that to understand the Old Testament, you have to read it in light of the New Testament. This is a wonderful thing, obviously, and this is why we want the Jews to convert. BUT - we also don't go out of our way to harass the Jews. The Church Fathers all the way up to Aquinas point out there's actually something beautiful in the unfolding of providence that the Jews persist. You don't see a lot of Zoroastrians hanging around anymore, or Hittites & Canaanites." We reflect on the Church's historic and continued relationship to Judaism 👇

Isabel Brown

122,129 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

HOLY CRAP: Michael Knowles just said he does NOT identiy as a "Christian Zionist" and that the Church is the new spiritual Israel under the New Covenant. "I don't think the Jews are entitled to the Holy Land because of some religious premise." Michael says Zionism makes historical and religious claims that he does not believe are true. He also argues that just because Jews had the land 2,000 years ago that it doesn't mean they're entitled to it today. It's incredible to see mainstream Right-Wingers finally sharing their position on Israel. The world is waking up.
4:05

HOLY CRAP: Michael Knowles just said he does NOT identiy as a "Christian Zionist" and that the Church is the new spiritual Israel under the New Covenant. "I don't think the Jews are entitled to the Holy Land because of some religious premise." Michael says Zionism makes historical and religious claims that he does not believe are true. He also argues that just because Jews had the land 2,000 years ago that it doesn't mean they're entitled to it today. It's incredible to see mainstream Right-Wingers finally sharing their position on Israel. The world is waking up.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

882,536 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Michael Knowles says he doesn't identify as a “Christian Zionist”, disagreeing with the “right” of Jews to occupy the Holy Land based on a “some religious promise” and false “historical” claims. Knowles argues that the Church is the new spiritual Israel. Follow: AF Post
4:05

Michael Knowles says he doesn't identify as a “Christian Zionist”, disagreeing with the “right” of Jews to occupy the Holy Land based on a “some religious promise” and false “historical” claims. Knowles argues that the Church is the new spiritual Israel. Follow: AF Post

AF Post

108,246 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

NYT’s Lulu Garcia-Navarro: So, you have equated anti-Zionism with antisemitism. ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt: It is. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: One of the things I heard from people is that anti-Zionism for them is a desire to have the rights of Palestinians be equal to the rights of Jews in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Is that definition of anti-Zionism to you antisemitic? Jonathan Greenblatt: Well, look... if you believe my definition of Zionism — which is really not my definition, it’s widely accepted — it’s peculiar to me how anti-Zionism isn’t the opposite of that. How people choose to interpret it, to embellish it, to sort of dress it up as something other than what it is. But the reality is if you believe how I laid out Zionism, then anti-Zionism is pretty simple. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: I think the challenge is if someone defines their view of anti-Zionism in a way that allows for Jews to exist in a state of Israel but that grants Palestinians rights — but you’re seeing that as antisemitic.
5:43

NYT’s Lulu Garcia-Navarro: So, you have equated anti-Zionism with antisemitism. ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt: It is. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: One of the things I heard from people is that anti-Zionism for them is a desire to have the rights of Palestinians be equal to the rights of Jews in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Is that definition of anti-Zionism to you antisemitic? Jonathan Greenblatt: Well, look... if you believe my definition of Zionism — which is really not my definition, it’s widely accepted — it’s peculiar to me how anti-Zionism isn’t the opposite of that. How people choose to interpret it, to embellish it, to sort of dress it up as something other than what it is. But the reality is if you believe how I laid out Zionism, then anti-Zionism is pretty simple. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: I think the challenge is if someone defines their view of anti-Zionism in a way that allows for Jews to exist in a state of Israel but that grants Palestinians rights — but you’re seeing that as antisemitic.

Drop Site

218,776 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Former IDF Spox Jonathan Conricus: I think what Israel has done again is kind of shuffle the cards, and hopefully sent a message to terrorists, their supporters and countries that think about harboring terrorists, that even if you’ve been a beneficiary of the U.S. for a long time, and even if you think that you are untouchable—like you’re a made man in the mafia—you’re not. And if you harbor evil terrorists that kill Israeli civilians and try to kill additional Israeli civilians, and claim that you want to wage jihad until the last Jew is dead in Israel, then you are a target no matter where you are. It’s a matter of a political decision, because the military capabilities exist; Israel has the intel and the ordnance delivery capabilities. And I think what Israel did now is indicate that we are serious and we are going to deliver justice to each and every senior terrorist of value that threatens Israel. I think that’s a very important message. I hope that all terrorists and other state supporters of terrorism are paying notice. I would wish that the Turks would stop housing and supporting Hamas, because that looks like the next episode. Maybe far away, but it looks like kind of the next episode in this saga, and I would rather avoid it. But I think Israel is determined to really shift its posture here in the Middle East and not agree to have its civilians slaughtered like they were on October 7th, and to do everything necessary in order to prevent it—even if it is things that people will find offensive and will criticize Israel for doing. Mario Nawfal Jonathan Conricus John Kiriakou
1:38

Former IDF Spox Jonathan Conricus: I think what Israel has done again is kind of shuffle the cards, and hopefully sent a message to terrorists, their supporters and countries that think about harboring terrorists, that even if you’ve been a beneficiary of the U.S. for a long time, and even if you think that you are untouchable—like you’re a made man in the mafia—you’re not. And if you harbor evil terrorists that kill Israeli civilians and try to kill additional Israeli civilians, and claim that you want to wage jihad until the last Jew is dead in Israel, then you are a target no matter where you are. It’s a matter of a political decision, because the military capabilities exist; Israel has the intel and the ordnance delivery capabilities. And I think what Israel did now is indicate that we are serious and we are going to deliver justice to each and every senior terrorist of value that threatens Israel. I think that’s a very important message. I hope that all terrorists and other state supporters of terrorism are paying notice. I would wish that the Turks would stop housing and supporting Hamas, because that looks like the next episode. Maybe far away, but it looks like kind of the next episode in this saga, and I would rather avoid it. But I think Israel is determined to really shift its posture here in the Middle East and not agree to have its civilians slaughtered like they were on October 7th, and to do everything necessary in order to prevent it—even if it is things that people will find offensive and will criticize Israel for doing. Mario Nawfal Jonathan Conricus John Kiriakou

dan linnaeus

73,647 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

John MacArthur at a church in 1988 explaining one of the issues that prevented him from supporting a covenant theologian's view on the future of Israel: "God promised Israel all kinds of things. If you're a covenant theologian, you say, 'But that's not literal. That's all figurative, and that's all talking about spiritual blessings to the church.' The problem with that is, you've got all the literal curses, and now, you've arbitrarily made all the promises figurative. And you've taken all the curses and applied them to literal Israel, and all the blessings and applied them to figurative Israel, namely, the church. And I think that's really an impossible kind of hermeneutic, because you've arbitrarily determined that."
3:43

John MacArthur at a church in 1988 explaining one of the issues that prevented him from supporting a covenant theologian's view on the future of Israel: "God promised Israel all kinds of things. If you're a covenant theologian, you say, 'But that's not literal. That's all figurative, and that's all talking about spiritual blessings to the church.' The problem with that is, you've got all the literal curses, and now, you've arbitrarily made all the promises figurative. And you've taken all the curses and applied them to literal Israel, and all the blessings and applied them to figurative Israel, namely, the church. And I think that's really an impossible kind of hermeneutic, because you've arbitrarily determined that."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

269,459 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

"I could see the growth of the stablecoin market dramatically eclipsing the growth of the euro dollar market. And so over time, you've kind of got these parallel systems and the new system is kind of cannibalizing the old system. But I also think, from a government's perspective, you don't want it all just to disappear because of some blackout or some. So I think physical currency is still going to exist. One of the ways that they fund these black projects is through cash because it's not traceable, right? I don't think that the Pentagon wants to put all of their transactions on the blockchain that everybody can see. It's almost like a belt in suspenders. They're going to have kind of redundant systems. And so one system is physical cash. Another system is gold. Another system is the traditional euro dollar market. And the newest system is this US dollar stablecoin. So it's a number of different systems through which you can deliver the same value." Santiago Capital of 💰 🔗
2:05

"I could see the growth of the stablecoin market dramatically eclipsing the growth of the euro dollar market. And so over time, you've kind of got these parallel systems and the new system is kind of cannibalizing the old system. But I also think, from a government's perspective, you don't want it all just to disappear because of some blackout or some. So I think physical currency is still going to exist. One of the ways that they fund these black projects is through cash because it's not traceable, right? I don't think that the Pentagon wants to put all of their transactions on the blockchain that everybody can see. It's almost like a belt in suspenders. They're going to have kind of redundant systems. And so one system is physical cash. Another system is gold. Another system is the traditional euro dollar market. And the newest system is this US dollar stablecoin. So it's a number of different systems through which you can deliver the same value." Santiago Capital of 💰 🔗

Geopolitics & Empire

18,942 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The fact that the universe doesn’t care about you doesn’t mean that other humans don’t care about you, or that we don’t have to care about other humans. That is, there is a purpose, there is a meaning: that is, to make people as well off as possible, to increase flourishing, to increase knowledge and life and health and freedom and safety. These are really, really meaningful. At least, I think they are. I don’t see anything wrong with them. I don’t think that that should leave you empty. And the fact that we live in a cold universe—that is, the laws of physics, the laws of biology, the behavior of viruses and bacteria and parasites and fungi—they don’t care about you. I’m sorry, they don’t care about you. And the sooner you realize that, the more you’ll be able to attend to the things that really do matter. Human Progress
0:51

The fact that the universe doesn’t care about you doesn’t mean that other humans don’t care about you, or that we don’t have to care about other humans. That is, there is a purpose, there is a meaning: that is, to make people as well off as possible, to increase flourishing, to increase knowledge and life and health and freedom and safety. These are really, really meaningful. At least, I think they are. I don’t see anything wrong with them. I don’t think that that should leave you empty. And the fact that we live in a cold universe—that is, the laws of physics, the laws of biology, the behavior of viruses and bacteria and parasites and fungi—they don’t care about you. I’m sorry, they don’t care about you. And the sooner you realize that, the more you’ll be able to attend to the things that really do matter. Human Progress

Steven Pinker

70,885 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Two years ago today, Elon Musk introduced xAI with these words: “The overarching goal of xAI is to build a good AGI with the purpose of trying to understand the universe. I think the safest AI, the safest way to build an AI is actually make one that is maximally curious and truth seeking. So you go for try to aspire to the truth with acknowledged error. Does one ever actually get fully to the truth? It's not clear, but one should always aspire to that and try to minimize the error between what you think is true and what is actually true. My theory behind the maximally curious, maximally truthful as being probably the safest approach is that I think to a superintelligence, humanity is much more interesting than not humanity. One can look at the various planets in our solar system, the moons and the asteroids, and really probably all of them combined are not as interesting as humanity. As people know, I'm a huge fan of Mars, but Mars is just much less interesting than Earth with humans on it. And so I think that that kind of approach to growing an AI, and I think that is the right word for it, growing an AI is to grow it with that ambition. I've spent many years thinking about AI safety and worrying about AI safety. And I've been one of the strongest voices calling for AI regulation or oversight just to have some kind of oversight, some kind of referee, so that it's not just up to companies to decide what they want to do. I think there's also a lot to be done with AI safety, with industry cooperation. I kind of like Motion Pictures association, so I think there's value to that as well. But I do think there's got to be some like in any kind of situation that is, even if it's a game, they have referees. So I think it is important for there to be regulation. Like I said, my view on safety is like try to make it maximally curious, maximally truth seeking. And I think this is, this is important that you to avoid the inverse morality problem. Like if you try to program a certain morality, you can have the, you, you can basically invert it and get the opposite, what is sometimes called the Waluigi problem. If you make Luigi, you risk creating Waluigi at the same time. So I think that's a metaphor that a lot of people can appreciate.”
3:14

Two years ago today, Elon Musk introduced xAI with these words: “The overarching goal of xAI is to build a good AGI with the purpose of trying to understand the universe. I think the safest AI, the safest way to build an AI is actually make one that is maximally curious and truth seeking. So you go for try to aspire to the truth with acknowledged error. Does one ever actually get fully to the truth? It's not clear, but one should always aspire to that and try to minimize the error between what you think is true and what is actually true. My theory behind the maximally curious, maximally truthful as being probably the safest approach is that I think to a superintelligence, humanity is much more interesting than not humanity. One can look at the various planets in our solar system, the moons and the asteroids, and really probably all of them combined are not as interesting as humanity. As people know, I'm a huge fan of Mars, but Mars is just much less interesting than Earth with humans on it. And so I think that that kind of approach to growing an AI, and I think that is the right word for it, growing an AI is to grow it with that ambition. I've spent many years thinking about AI safety and worrying about AI safety. And I've been one of the strongest voices calling for AI regulation or oversight just to have some kind of oversight, some kind of referee, so that it's not just up to companies to decide what they want to do. I think there's also a lot to be done with AI safety, with industry cooperation. I kind of like Motion Pictures association, so I think there's value to that as well. But I do think there's got to be some like in any kind of situation that is, even if it's a game, they have referees. So I think it is important for there to be regulation. Like I said, my view on safety is like try to make it maximally curious, maximally truth seeking. And I think this is, this is important that you to avoid the inverse morality problem. Like if you try to program a certain morality, you can have the, you, you can basically invert it and get the opposite, what is sometimes called the Waluigi problem. If you make Luigi, you risk creating Waluigi at the same time. So I think that's a metaphor that a lot of people can appreciate.”

ELON CLIPS

21,519 просмотров • 1 год назад

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"
4:06

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Seethroughitall

23,627 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

#WATCH | "We changed the Middle East. Now comes President Trump and Secretary Rubio, who is a great friend of Israel... We have the greatest friend of Israel in the White House now. We have to see eye to eye on the main task that we have to accomplish. And we're in a position to change the Middle East and give Israel the kind of arising, the kind of hope, the kind of security and the kind of peace that would have been unimaginable and, in fact, was unimaginable from the day of the founding of the State of Israel... We see eye to eye with the US Administration, President Trump and his administration, first of all, on accomplishing the immediate three goals that we have in Gaza. One is to achieve the release of all our hostages. The second, as I said, is to destroy Hamas. The third is to ensure that Gaza has a different future and that we don't just go back to the same old, same old, same old. And there, I have to say that President Trump has presented a bold new vision and the only plan that I think can work to enable a different future for the people of Gaza, for the people of Israel, and for the surrounding areas..," says Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu in his address at the Israeli Presidential Conference in Jerusalem (Source - Reuters)
3:38

#WATCH | "We changed the Middle East. Now comes President Trump and Secretary Rubio, who is a great friend of Israel... We have the greatest friend of Israel in the White House now. We have to see eye to eye on the main task that we have to accomplish. And we're in a position to change the Middle East and give Israel the kind of arising, the kind of hope, the kind of security and the kind of peace that would have been unimaginable and, in fact, was unimaginable from the day of the founding of the State of Israel... We see eye to eye with the US Administration, President Trump and his administration, first of all, on accomplishing the immediate three goals that we have in Gaza. One is to achieve the release of all our hostages. The second, as I said, is to destroy Hamas. The third is to ensure that Gaza has a different future and that we don't just go back to the same old, same old, same old. And there, I have to say that President Trump has presented a bold new vision and the only plan that I think can work to enable a different future for the people of Gaza, for the people of Israel, and for the surrounding areas..," says Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu in his address at the Israeli Presidential Conference in Jerusalem (Source - Reuters)

ANI

53,093 просмотров • 1 год назад

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.
1:39

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

381,397 просмотров • 1 год назад

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.
1:46

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

38,263 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇮🇱🇱🇧 U.S. COLONEL MACGREGOR: DON’T FOOL YOURSELVES, LEBANESE... ISRAEL WON'T BACK OFF "If I were in Lebanon and betting that Israel is somehow going to change and suddenly abandon any goal of acquiring new territory from Lebanon, and that therefore we can justify accelerating the disarmament of Hezbollah, I would say the people in Lebanon are delusional. I think that Israel has its eye on everything south of the Litani River. They are currently occupying the watershed in the mountains adjacent to Lebanon and adjacent to Syria, in southern Syria. I don’t see any evidence that any of that is going to change."
5:22

🇮🇱🇱🇧 U.S. COLONEL MACGREGOR: DON’T FOOL YOURSELVES, LEBANESE... ISRAEL WON'T BACK OFF "If I were in Lebanon and betting that Israel is somehow going to change and suddenly abandon any goal of acquiring new territory from Lebanon, and that therefore we can justify accelerating the disarmament of Hezbollah, I would say the people in Lebanon are delusional. I think that Israel has its eye on everything south of the Litani River. They are currently occupying the watershed in the mountains adjacent to Lebanon and adjacent to Syria, in southern Syria. I don’t see any evidence that any of that is going to change."

Mario Nawfal

72,441 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

.Elon Musk speaking live: “I’m a huge admirer of the innovation coming out of Israel, it is objectively true that Israel punches high above its weight — I think honestly number one in the world… innovation per capita, Israel is by far number one in the world.”
0:45

.Elon Musk speaking live: “I’m a huge admirer of the innovation coming out of Israel, it is objectively true that Israel punches high above its weight — I think honestly number one in the world… innovation per capita, Israel is by far number one in the world.”

Michael Granoff

215,147 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

How bad of an argument is this? Adam Green - Know More News "So what is the evidence the resurrection took place? I can't trust these Christian sources that you find in the Bible that you find in the news new testament. News flash, ladies and gentlemen. None of the sources in the New Testament are Christian sources. They're all Jewish sources" "Oh, yes, these men became Christians, but they all started as Jews. Why would they invent a resurrected Jesus, a brand new religion that got them kicked out of the synagogue, and then beaten, tortured, and killed if it wasn't true? They wouldn't"
0:39

How bad of an argument is this? Adam Green - Know More News "So what is the evidence the resurrection took place? I can't trust these Christian sources that you find in the Bible that you find in the news new testament. News flash, ladies and gentlemen. None of the sources in the New Testament are Christian sources. They're all Jewish sources" "Oh, yes, these men became Christians, but they all started as Jews. Why would they invent a resurrected Jesus, a brand new religion that got them kicked out of the synagogue, and then beaten, tortured, and killed if it wasn't true? They wouldn't"

Seethroughitall

96,570 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Joe Rogan just opened up about his journey to Christianity. “I don’t think it’s myth.” “I think they’re relaying truth.” “I think it is an ancient relaying of a real event and the real history of human beings.” “I don’t think the whole thing is myth, but I don’t think it’s entirely accurate either.” “I don’t know what the serpent in the garden and Adam and Eve and the apple … means.” “When they talk about the first human beings, I assume that that is a recounting of a genetic manipulation.” “If you’re telling a story for thousands of years where people don’t even have books, they don’t have paper, they don’t have a written language … they’re just trying to remember what they knew from thousands and thousands of years before when they had achieved a very high level of sophistication—which is what I think happened—this is the kind of story that you get.” “There’s a lot of truth in there.” “But I think the, the ultimate story is lost.” “The ultimate truth … I don’t think it’s accurately documented anywhere.” Joe Rogan Jesse Michels
3:14

Joe Rogan just opened up about his journey to Christianity. “I don’t think it’s myth.” “I think they’re relaying truth.” “I think it is an ancient relaying of a real event and the real history of human beings.” “I don’t think the whole thing is myth, but I don’t think it’s entirely accurate either.” “I don’t know what the serpent in the garden and Adam and Eve and the apple … means.” “When they talk about the first human beings, I assume that that is a recounting of a genetic manipulation.” “If you’re telling a story for thousands of years where people don’t even have books, they don’t have paper, they don’t have a written language … they’re just trying to remember what they knew from thousands and thousands of years before when they had achieved a very high level of sophistication—which is what I think happened—this is the kind of story that you get.” “There’s a lot of truth in there.” “But I think the, the ultimate story is lost.” “The ultimate truth … I don’t think it’s accurately documented anywhere.” Joe Rogan Jesse Michels

Holden Culotta

818,574 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

WHY IS IT THAT ANY AND EVERY PERSON THAT IS IN OUR GOVERNMENT OR HAS ANY KIND OF INFLUENCE SEEMS TO SUFFER THE SAME FATE IF THEY SPEAK OUT ABOUT THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT AND EPSTEIN? We all know the answer I think. But just in case you don’t… Watch this.
9:20

WHY IS IT THAT ANY AND EVERY PERSON THAT IS IN OUR GOVERNMENT OR HAS ANY KIND OF INFLUENCE SEEMS TO SUFFER THE SAME FATE IF THEY SPEAK OUT ABOUT THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT AND EPSTEIN? We all know the answer I think. But just in case you don’t… Watch this.

Ian

111,296 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад