Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This is Michael Knowles calling Zionism a relatively new innovation that started out secular. “‘If you think that Israel has a right to exist, then you are a Zionist.’ But I don’t think that claim is exactly true…The traditional Christian perspective is that the New Testament is the fulfillment... of the Old Testament, and the Church is the new Israel, the spiritual Israel, and so these kind of specific ethnic claims that come out of the Old Testament, they don’t really hold true…There is a kind of innovation that comes about in the 19th century focused on returning Jews specifically to the homeland…” Every time I think I start to have a grasp on the theological question of Israel, someone I respect and admire (like Michael) argues the opposite—and kind of effectively. I don’t think there is any one topic that currently confuses me more than this one, because people say literally opposite things—and all of them self-professed Christians.show more

Natalie Jean Beisner

113,688 subscribers

15,385 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I’ll see your Tucker Carlson theological take on Israel and raise you a John MacArthur truth bomb. “There is a Christian kind of popular doctrine that I reject with all my heart and that is that the church has replaced Israel in the promises of God. It’s called supersessionism. I don’t believe in that…I honestly think that it’s a latent form of antisemitism to say that.”

I’ll see your Tucker Carlson theological take on Israel and raise you a John MacArthur truth bomb. “There is a Christian kind of popular doctrine that I reject with all my heart and that is that the church has replaced Israel in the promises of God. It’s called supersessionism. I don’t believe in that…I honestly think that it’s a latent form of antisemitism to say that.”

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

288,146 views • 10 months ago

.Michael Knowles says Christianity is "the fulfillment of the Old Testament. The early Christians read the Old Testament as a figure of the New Testament. David is a figure of Christ, Jonah and the whale is a figure of the Resurrection, the ark of the covenant is a figure of Mary. We believe that to understand the Old Testament, you have to read it in light of the New Testament. This is a wonderful thing, obviously, and this is why we want the Jews to convert. BUT - we also don't go out of our way to harass the Jews. The Church Fathers all the way up to Aquinas point out there's actually something beautiful in the unfolding of providence that the Jews persist. You don't see a lot of Zoroastrians hanging around anymore, or Hittites & Canaanites." We reflect on the Church's historic and continued relationship to Judaism 👇

.Michael Knowles says Christianity is "the fulfillment of the Old Testament. The early Christians read the Old Testament as a figure of the New Testament. David is a figure of Christ, Jonah and the whale is a figure of the Resurrection, the ark of the covenant is a figure of Mary. We believe that to understand the Old Testament, you have to read it in light of the New Testament. This is a wonderful thing, obviously, and this is why we want the Jews to convert. BUT - we also don't go out of our way to harass the Jews. The Church Fathers all the way up to Aquinas point out there's actually something beautiful in the unfolding of providence that the Jews persist. You don't see a lot of Zoroastrians hanging around anymore, or Hittites & Canaanites." We reflect on the Church's historic and continued relationship to Judaism 👇

Isabel Brown

122,129 views • 7 months ago

HOLY CRAP: Michael Knowles just said he does NOT identiy as a "Christian Zionist" and that the Church is the new spiritual Israel under the New Covenant. "I don't think the Jews are entitled to the Holy Land because of some religious premise." Michael says Zionism makes historical and religious claims that he does not believe are true. He also argues that just because Jews had the land 2,000 years ago that it doesn't mean they're entitled to it today. It's incredible to see mainstream Right-Wingers finally sharing their position on Israel. The world is waking up.

HOLY CRAP: Michael Knowles just said he does NOT identiy as a "Christian Zionist" and that the Church is the new spiritual Israel under the New Covenant. "I don't think the Jews are entitled to the Holy Land because of some religious premise." Michael says Zionism makes historical and religious claims that he does not believe are true. He also argues that just because Jews had the land 2,000 years ago that it doesn't mean they're entitled to it today. It's incredible to see mainstream Right-Wingers finally sharing their position on Israel. The world is waking up.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

882,821 views • 7 months ago

Michael Knowles says he doesn't identify as a “Christian Zionist”, disagreeing with the “right” of Jews to occupy the Holy Land based on a “some religious promise” and false “historical” claims. Knowles argues that the Church is the new spiritual Israel. Follow: AF Post

Michael Knowles says he doesn't identify as a “Christian Zionist”, disagreeing with the “right” of Jews to occupy the Holy Land based on a “some religious promise” and false “historical” claims. Knowles argues that the Church is the new spiritual Israel. Follow: AF Post

AF Post

108,246 views • 7 months ago

NYT’s Lulu Garcia-Navarro: So, you have equated anti-Zionism with antisemitism. ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt: It is. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: One of the things I heard from people is that anti-Zionism for them is a desire to have the rights of Palestinians be equal to the rights of Jews in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Is that definition of anti-Zionism to you antisemitic? Jonathan Greenblatt: Well, look... if you believe my definition of Zionism — which is really not my definition, it’s widely accepted — it’s peculiar to me how anti-Zionism isn’t the opposite of that. How people choose to interpret it, to embellish it, to sort of dress it up as something other than what it is. But the reality is if you believe how I laid out Zionism, then anti-Zionism is pretty simple. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: I think the challenge is if someone defines their view of anti-Zionism in a way that allows for Jews to exist in a state of Israel but that grants Palestinians rights — but you’re seeing that as antisemitic.

NYT’s Lulu Garcia-Navarro: So, you have equated anti-Zionism with antisemitism. ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt: It is. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: One of the things I heard from people is that anti-Zionism for them is a desire to have the rights of Palestinians be equal to the rights of Jews in Israel and the Palestinian territories. Is that definition of anti-Zionism to you antisemitic? Jonathan Greenblatt: Well, look... if you believe my definition of Zionism — which is really not my definition, it’s widely accepted — it’s peculiar to me how anti-Zionism isn’t the opposite of that. How people choose to interpret it, to embellish it, to sort of dress it up as something other than what it is. But the reality is if you believe how I laid out Zionism, then anti-Zionism is pretty simple. Lulu Garcia-Navarro: I think the challenge is if someone defines their view of anti-Zionism in a way that allows for Jews to exist in a state of Israel but that grants Palestinians rights — but you’re seeing that as antisemitic.

Drop Site

219,025 views • 1 year ago

Former IDF Spox Jonathan Conricus: I think what Israel has done again is kind of shuffle the cards, and hopefully sent a message to terrorists, their supporters and countries that think about harboring terrorists, that even if you’ve been a beneficiary of the U.S. for a long time, and even if you think that you are untouchable—like you’re a made man in the mafia—you’re not. And if you harbor evil terrorists that kill Israeli civilians and try to kill additional Israeli civilians, and claim that you want to wage jihad until the last Jew is dead in Israel, then you are a target no matter where you are. It’s a matter of a political decision, because the military capabilities exist; Israel has the intel and the ordnance delivery capabilities. And I think what Israel did now is indicate that we are serious and we are going to deliver justice to each and every senior terrorist of value that threatens Israel. I think that’s a very important message. I hope that all terrorists and other state supporters of terrorism are paying notice. I would wish that the Turks would stop housing and supporting Hamas, because that looks like the next episode. Maybe far away, but it looks like kind of the next episode in this saga, and I would rather avoid it. But I think Israel is determined to really shift its posture here in the Middle East and not agree to have its civilians slaughtered like they were on October 7th, and to do everything necessary in order to prevent it—even if it is things that people will find offensive and will criticize Israel for doing. Mario Nawfal Jonathan Conricus John Kiriakou

Former IDF Spox Jonathan Conricus: I think what Israel has done again is kind of shuffle the cards, and hopefully sent a message to terrorists, their supporters and countries that think about harboring terrorists, that even if you’ve been a beneficiary of the U.S. for a long time, and even if you think that you are untouchable—like you’re a made man in the mafia—you’re not. And if you harbor evil terrorists that kill Israeli civilians and try to kill additional Israeli civilians, and claim that you want to wage jihad until the last Jew is dead in Israel, then you are a target no matter where you are. It’s a matter of a political decision, because the military capabilities exist; Israel has the intel and the ordnance delivery capabilities. And I think what Israel did now is indicate that we are serious and we are going to deliver justice to each and every senior terrorist of value that threatens Israel. I think that’s a very important message. I hope that all terrorists and other state supporters of terrorism are paying notice. I would wish that the Turks would stop housing and supporting Hamas, because that looks like the next episode. Maybe far away, but it looks like kind of the next episode in this saga, and I would rather avoid it. But I think Israel is determined to really shift its posture here in the Middle East and not agree to have its civilians slaughtered like they were on October 7th, and to do everything necessary in order to prevent it—even if it is things that people will find offensive and will criticize Israel for doing. Mario Nawfal Jonathan Conricus John Kiriakou

dan linnaeus

73,647 views • 11 months ago

John MacArthur at a church in 1988 explaining one of the issues that prevented him from supporting a covenant theologian's view on the future of Israel: "God promised Israel all kinds of things. If you're a covenant theologian, you say, 'But that's not literal. That's all figurative, and that's all talking about spiritual blessings to the church.' The problem with that is, you've got all the literal curses, and now, you've arbitrarily made all the promises figurative. And you've taken all the curses and applied them to literal Israel, and all the blessings and applied them to figurative Israel, namely, the church. And I think that's really an impossible kind of hermeneutic, because you've arbitrarily determined that."

John MacArthur at a church in 1988 explaining one of the issues that prevented him from supporting a covenant theologian's view on the future of Israel: "God promised Israel all kinds of things. If you're a covenant theologian, you say, 'But that's not literal. That's all figurative, and that's all talking about spiritual blessings to the church.' The problem with that is, you've got all the literal curses, and now, you've arbitrarily made all the promises figurative. And you've taken all the curses and applied them to literal Israel, and all the blessings and applied them to figurative Israel, namely, the church. And I think that's really an impossible kind of hermeneutic, because you've arbitrarily determined that."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

269,705 views • 6 months ago

"I could see the growth of the stablecoin market dramatically eclipsing the growth of the euro dollar market. And so over time, you've kind of got these parallel systems and the new system is kind of cannibalizing the old system. But I also think, from a government's perspective, you don't want it all just to disappear because of some blackout or some. So I think physical currency is still going to exist. One of the ways that they fund these black projects is through cash because it's not traceable, right? I don't think that the Pentagon wants to put all of their transactions on the blockchain that everybody can see. It's almost like a belt in suspenders. They're going to have kind of redundant systems. And so one system is physical cash. Another system is gold. Another system is the traditional euro dollar market. And the newest system is this US dollar stablecoin. So it's a number of different systems through which you can deliver the same value." Santiago Capital of 💰 🔗

"I could see the growth of the stablecoin market dramatically eclipsing the growth of the euro dollar market. And so over time, you've kind of got these parallel systems and the new system is kind of cannibalizing the old system. But I also think, from a government's perspective, you don't want it all just to disappear because of some blackout or some. So I think physical currency is still going to exist. One of the ways that they fund these black projects is through cash because it's not traceable, right? I don't think that the Pentagon wants to put all of their transactions on the blockchain that everybody can see. It's almost like a belt in suspenders. They're going to have kind of redundant systems. And so one system is physical cash. Another system is gold. Another system is the traditional euro dollar market. And the newest system is this US dollar stablecoin. So it's a number of different systems through which you can deliver the same value." Santiago Capital of 💰 🔗

Geopolitics & Empire

18,942 views • 7 months ago

The fact that the universe doesn’t care about you doesn’t mean that other humans don’t care about you, or that we don’t have to care about other humans. That is, there is a purpose, there is a meaning: that is, to make people as well off as possible, to increase flourishing, to increase knowledge and life and health and freedom and safety. These are really, really meaningful. At least, I think they are. I don’t see anything wrong with them. I don’t think that that should leave you empty. And the fact that we live in a cold universe—that is, the laws of physics, the laws of biology, the behavior of viruses and bacteria and parasites and fungi—they don’t care about you. I’m sorry, they don’t care about you. And the sooner you realize that, the more you’ll be able to attend to the things that really do matter. Human Progress

The fact that the universe doesn’t care about you doesn’t mean that other humans don’t care about you, or that we don’t have to care about other humans. That is, there is a purpose, there is a meaning: that is, to make people as well off as possible, to increase flourishing, to increase knowledge and life and health and freedom and safety. These are really, really meaningful. At least, I think they are. I don’t see anything wrong with them. I don’t think that that should leave you empty. And the fact that we live in a cold universe—that is, the laws of physics, the laws of biology, the behavior of viruses and bacteria and parasites and fungi—they don’t care about you. I’m sorry, they don’t care about you. And the sooner you realize that, the more you’ll be able to attend to the things that really do matter. Human Progress

Steven Pinker

70,957 views • 4 months ago

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

381,905 views • 1 year ago

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Christianity is a National Security Threat: "We have a Bible mandate to be a comfort to the Jewish people because they have been through the hell of the Holocaust" "God has never called the Gentile people in the Old Testament his people. These are the Jewish people" "We are doing what we are doing in order to ensure that America continues to survive and thrive because the Bible says, "I will bless those who bless you, Israel. I will curse those who curse you, Israel." "History has shown us that both biblical and otherwise. And whether we like it or not, the modern state of Israel is proof positive that the Bible is true and that God is real." "And that is why we do what we do. If the nation of is Israel ceased to exist, then the Bible is a lie. And so we are not lobbying for a foreign nation. We are exercising what we believe is our biblical mandate to do what we can to bless the nation of Israel and its people"

Seethroughitall

23,716 views • 6 months ago

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Judaism is never Zionism. Judaism is a religion and Zionism is a political ideology that has nothing to do with Judaism. How can being against Zionism count as being against Jews or Judaism? Zionism is a political ideology created a century ago by Zionist leaders who did not even believe in Judaism. The mainstream media, which is under the control of the Zionists, constantly lies to you as if all Jews are on the side of Israel, but this is a big lie. Thousands of Torah Jews in the world are against Israel and Zionism. Rabbi Chaim Brisker, one of the greatest rabbis a century ago, once said: “There have been many heretical groups in Jewish history, but Zionism is the worst. Being against Zionism is never Antisemitism. Criticizing Israel is never antisemitism. Zionism is not Judaism. Israel is not a Jewish state. There are thousands of anti-Zionist, anti-Israel Jews in the world, and now you claim that Jews are the enemies of Judaism.

Voice of Rabbis

38,281 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | "We changed the Middle East. Now comes President Trump and Secretary Rubio, who is a great friend of Israel... We have the greatest friend of Israel in the White House now. We have to see eye to eye on the main task that we have to accomplish. And we're in a position to change the Middle East and give Israel the kind of arising, the kind of hope, the kind of security and the kind of peace that would have been unimaginable and, in fact, was unimaginable from the day of the founding of the State of Israel... We see eye to eye with the US Administration, President Trump and his administration, first of all, on accomplishing the immediate three goals that we have in Gaza. One is to achieve the release of all our hostages. The second, as I said, is to destroy Hamas. The third is to ensure that Gaza has a different future and that we don't just go back to the same old, same old, same old. And there, I have to say that President Trump has presented a bold new vision and the only plan that I think can work to enable a different future for the people of Gaza, for the people of Israel, and for the surrounding areas..," says Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu in his address at the Israeli Presidential Conference in Jerusalem (Source - Reuters)

#WATCH | "We changed the Middle East. Now comes President Trump and Secretary Rubio, who is a great friend of Israel... We have the greatest friend of Israel in the White House now. We have to see eye to eye on the main task that we have to accomplish. And we're in a position to change the Middle East and give Israel the kind of arising, the kind of hope, the kind of security and the kind of peace that would have been unimaginable and, in fact, was unimaginable from the day of the founding of the State of Israel... We see eye to eye with the US Administration, President Trump and his administration, first of all, on accomplishing the immediate three goals that we have in Gaza. One is to achieve the release of all our hostages. The second, as I said, is to destroy Hamas. The third is to ensure that Gaza has a different future and that we don't just go back to the same old, same old, same old. And there, I have to say that President Trump has presented a bold new vision and the only plan that I think can work to enable a different future for the people of Gaza, for the people of Israel, and for the surrounding areas..," says Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu in his address at the Israeli Presidential Conference in Jerusalem (Source - Reuters)

ANI

53,093 views • 1 year ago

I was asked by USA Today to respond to remarks made by Hasan Piker about Zionism. Piker claimed as follows: “Zionism is the ethnoreligious supremacist ideology that is exterminationist in principle, born out of the wrong assessment that this was a land without people for a people without land. It required the extermination of the indigenous population, and that's precisely what has happened since its inception. And its final iteration of that has been the Gaza genocide that we watched unfold.” You can call a blowtorch an avocado as many times as you want, but it still doesn’t have a seed, and it still isn’t green because it’s still just a blowtorch. The claim that Zionism is an exterminationist ideology is just as nonsensical as calling a blowtorch an avocado. The suggestion that Jews want to exterminate the Arabs who also live on the land is likewise, as it has always been, ludicrous and false. Zionism is a simple idea, which is that Jews have the same rights — not more rights, but also not fewer rights — than every other people on Earth have to sovereignty in their national homeland. So just as you might think that Bulgarians have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Japanese people, Korean people, German people all have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Zionism is just the idea that Jews should be treated the same. By the way, this is in the charter, the charter that is the foundation of the state of Israel. In that document, the word ‘extermination,’ of course, would never appear there, but anything that even remotely resembles that word or idea is foreign to any of the early laws or that document. In fact, the document says precisely the opposite. The document says that one of the purposes of the state of Israel is to allow Jews and Arabs alike to live in peace and to flourish together in the land of Israel. That's what the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel says, and by the way, that's what the state of Israel has proven, more so than what it said in 1948, in the decades since.

I was asked by USA Today to respond to remarks made by Hasan Piker about Zionism. Piker claimed as follows: “Zionism is the ethnoreligious supremacist ideology that is exterminationist in principle, born out of the wrong assessment that this was a land without people for a people without land. It required the extermination of the indigenous population, and that's precisely what has happened since its inception. And its final iteration of that has been the Gaza genocide that we watched unfold.” You can call a blowtorch an avocado as many times as you want, but it still doesn’t have a seed, and it still isn’t green because it’s still just a blowtorch. The claim that Zionism is an exterminationist ideology is just as nonsensical as calling a blowtorch an avocado. The suggestion that Jews want to exterminate the Arabs who also live on the land is likewise, as it has always been, ludicrous and false. Zionism is a simple idea, which is that Jews have the same rights — not more rights, but also not fewer rights — than every other people on Earth have to sovereignty in their national homeland. So just as you might think that Bulgarians have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Japanese people, Korean people, German people all have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Zionism is just the idea that Jews should be treated the same. By the way, this is in the charter, the charter that is the foundation of the state of Israel. In that document, the word ‘extermination,’ of course, would never appear there, but anything that even remotely resembles that word or idea is foreign to any of the early laws or that document. In fact, the document says precisely the opposite. The document says that one of the purposes of the state of Israel is to allow Jews and Arabs alike to live in peace and to flourish together in the land of Israel. That's what the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel says, and by the way, that's what the state of Israel has proven, more so than what it said in 1948, in the decades since.

Roy K. Altman

20,582 views • 1 month ago

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 views • 1 month ago

How bad of an argument is this? Adam Green - Know More News "So what is the evidence the resurrection took place? I can't trust these Christian sources that you find in the Bible that you find in the news new testament. News flash, ladies and gentlemen. None of the sources in the New Testament are Christian sources. They're all Jewish sources" "Oh, yes, these men became Christians, but they all started as Jews. Why would they invent a resurrected Jesus, a brand new religion that got them kicked out of the synagogue, and then beaten, tortured, and killed if it wasn't true? They wouldn't"

Seethroughitall

96,570 views • 8 months ago

.Elon Musk speaking live: “I’m a huge admirer of the innovation coming out of Israel, it is objectively true that Israel punches high above its weight — I think honestly number one in the world… innovation per capita, Israel is by far number one in the world.”

.Elon Musk speaking live: “I’m a huge admirer of the innovation coming out of Israel, it is objectively true that Israel punches high above its weight — I think honestly number one in the world… innovation per capita, Israel is by far number one in the world.”

Michael Granoff

215,373 views • 3 months ago

Joe Rogan just opened up about his journey to Christianity. “I don’t think it’s myth.” “I think they’re relaying truth.” “I think it is an ancient relaying of a real event and the real history of human beings.” “I don’t think the whole thing is myth, but I don’t think it’s entirely accurate either.” “I don’t know what the serpent in the garden and Adam and Eve and the apple … means.” “When they talk about the first human beings, I assume that that is a recounting of a genetic manipulation.” “If you’re telling a story for thousands of years where people don’t even have books, they don’t have paper, they don’t have a written language … they’re just trying to remember what they knew from thousands and thousands of years before when they had achieved a very high level of sophistication—which is what I think happened—this is the kind of story that you get.” “There’s a lot of truth in there.” “But I think the, the ultimate story is lost.” “The ultimate truth … I don’t think it’s accurately documented anywhere.” Joe Rogan Jesse Michels

Joe Rogan just opened up about his journey to Christianity. “I don’t think it’s myth.” “I think they’re relaying truth.” “I think it is an ancient relaying of a real event and the real history of human beings.” “I don’t think the whole thing is myth, but I don’t think it’s entirely accurate either.” “I don’t know what the serpent in the garden and Adam and Eve and the apple … means.” “When they talk about the first human beings, I assume that that is a recounting of a genetic manipulation.” “If you’re telling a story for thousands of years where people don’t even have books, they don’t have paper, they don’t have a written language … they’re just trying to remember what they knew from thousands and thousands of years before when they had achieved a very high level of sophistication—which is what I think happened—this is the kind of story that you get.” “There’s a lot of truth in there.” “But I think the, the ultimate story is lost.” “The ultimate truth … I don’t think it’s accurately documented anywhere.” Joe Rogan Jesse Michels

Holden Culotta

818,683 views • 8 months ago