Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

I turned machine perception into a design system Machine vision is becoming its own visual language for digital culture - from interfaces to users' content and even branding So I built Machine Vision®: an open-source experiment around frame analysis, tracking data & digital motion overlays Works in 2 steps:...

33,073 просмотров • 7 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

RE: Data Center purpose. In addition to building a Digital Enslavement Grid—which is obvious—I think the larger thing they're building is a Machine that predicts AND creates the future. Because a machine that can predict the future is also essentially able to create the future simply by adjusting the inputs. They're trying to make a world that's currently indeterminate & uncertain into one that's determinate & certain—through the power of modeling & simulating entire worlds and entities billions of times, and creating a Future-Making All-Seeing-Eye Super Intelligence. Cyber god. If Your Future Machine is better, faster & smarter than The Other Guy's, your future wins. If Your Cyber god is more powerful than The Other Guy's, Your vision wins. Reality becomes what you decide. You can cripple all opposition, and subdue all others beneath you. Think of the world like a giant game of chess. If Your Machine plays better chess than The Other Guy's Machine, it's checkmate for him every time. To use another analogy: think of the classic idea that a butterfly flapping its wings in one part of the world creates a storm in another part of the world. We're talking about the power to know which butterfly, and where, is needed to create said storm, when and where. And the power to defeat The Other Guy's butterfly. Unfortunately, we Americans are all "the other guy" in this scenario (along with virtually every other people in the world). And the power of the future and reality will reside with who controls The Machine, who commands Cyber god. This "Data Center" push is nothing less than building the ability to seize absolute power over the world and shape the future into whatever vision the Tech Oligarchs desire for us, and we won't be able to do anything about it. Checkmate. Right now, they're positioning the pieces. Our window is limited. We're on the clock. Thoughts? What else do you think the implications are for the hyper-massive amount of computing power they're assembling?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

41,279 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Machine That Learns The Law Behind The Data A very very interesting US Patent US10963540B2 - Physics Informed Learning Machine describes a learning system that does not begin with data alone. It begins with a physical model, usually written as a differential equation (or PDE) dx/dt = f(x,t) A normal Machine Learning model sees scattered data and tries to fit it. A physics-informed learning machine starts with a law. Then it treats the data as evidence that updates what the model believes about the physical system. For this application, I use the patent idea on NASA C-MAPSS Turbofan engine data. The machine watches multivariate telemetry from a degrading engine and infers a hidden health state that is not measured directly. From that posterior belief, it estimates the engine’s remaining useful life. In the main 3D scene, the engine lifetime is turned into a tunnel. The spiral ribbons are real sensor channels evolving over cycle-time. The glowing core is the inferred health state. The surrounding cloud is uncertainty. The orange wall ahead is the predicted failure horizon. So the big picture is: sensor evidence comes in, posterior belief tightens, and the machine moves from uncertainty toward a concrete failure prediction. The inset posteriors make that explicit. The health posterior shows where the model believes the hidden engine condition sits at the current moment, and how sharply it believes it. The RUL posterior shows the same idea for remaining life... early on it is broad, later it shifts left and narrows as the machine becomes more certain about how close failure is. This idea is not limited to engines. The same idea can apply to data centers, CPUs, GPUs, cooling systems, power grids, robotics, batteries, and any machine that produces telemetry while obeying physical constraints. In an age where machine learning runs on massive hardware infrastructure, this kind of model matters: it can turn noisy sensor streams into early warnings before expensive systems fail.

Mathelirium

17,843 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад