正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
"I was able to find a forensic computer expert to look at the information that the prosecution's experts and Read's experts had gathered. He came to his own independent conclusion saying that the search did happen at 2:27 AM."
10 条评论

I have thought the denial of the 227 search was always hilarious. I have ate, slept and breathed Google products since 2006 with being a developer and writing and sourcing custom ROMS and more. GOOGLE search engines have absolutely NOTHING to do with what time a browser is opened.

I’ll never believe the marks on his arm were not from a dog.

My husband is a professional hacker. He agrees and thought the “experts” danced all around and used a lot of words to confuse everyone

Holy fuck… we need a carpet fundraiser ASAP… this is where irrefutable evidence can finally be brought to trial with no way to twist shit around. This needs to be explored

Ummm she’s paying for a temperature controlled storage unit with the Albert’s basement carpet?!?!!!!!🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

So the senior expert for the company that owns that software is lying. Elite analyst Hyde is lying. It's irrational to reject those experts, but you don't even need them to know this never happened. Karen asked the paramedic the same question on the ambulance. Or is the paramedic in on that too? It's almost over Aidan. You've been duped. You had offramps, chose not to take them. I'm sure you've considered it, because you know how this ends: guilty. You know the evidence is overwhelming and will only get worse once they get that new data. You were duped and don't have the integrity to admit it. But already people don't believe you any more. Your loyal following is shriveling. People know what you are. And there's no off ramp any more.

I usually have a poor view of the mainstream media. But at least in that short clip Ms. Miller comes across as smart, and well-informed about the case. Good for her to seek out some independent experts.

Of course the search happened at 2:27 am.

Cue the cartoon clowns with the accusations that Karen paid of Vanity Fair.

This explains the tone of the article. Hadn't been expecting that and was pleasantly surprised


