正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

I wrote this yesterday & many Pseudo Hindus started jumping like frogs giving me lecture on how to respect Shankaracharya without knowing that this Priyanka Vadra certified 'Dharm Ka Thekedar' is NOT EVEN Shankaracharya. It's time to EXPOSE him completely. Read FULL DETAILS👇 REALITY CHECK on the 'so-called' "Shankaracharya"...

MumbaichaDon's profile picture

BhikuMhatre

232,052 subscribers

48,684 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🔥Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati is fake baba and a Congress toy, slams Priyanka Vadra for calling him Shankaracharya despite SC stay order🔥🚩🔥 Govindananda Maharaj said, “This is for everyone, Congress, BJP, all CMs and the PM, HM and everyone who is supporting Avimukteshwaranand… The Congress party is giving complete support to Avimukteshwaranand… When our Guruji became ‘Brahmleen’, these people asked for a letter to Congress. The Congress issued a letter and Avimukteshwaranand reached the Supreme Court. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra wrote a letter on September 13, 2022, addressing him as revered Sankharachayra Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati Ji. How did Priyanka Gandhi Vadra write a letter addressing Avimukteshwaranand as the Shankaracharya when the Supreme Court had issued a stay?” Will Congress decide who the Shankaracharya is? He is standing against Narendra Modi and who is backing him? Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. Avimukteshwaranand will stand with Rahul Gandhi when he makes anti-Hindu remarks. Why? This letter is the reason. The Congress is playing a game and Avimukteshwaranand is the toy. I want to ask Priyanka Gandhi Vadra that she should either issue a public apology for writing this letter or we will file a contempt in the Supreme Court against her.” “One fake baba called Mukteshwaranand is getting popular these days. PM Modi has touched his feet and a big businessman like Anil Ambani welcomed him to his home. Some people on TV are giving him the tag of ‘Shankaracharya’. I want to give this message to all the citizens of the country that Mukteshwaranand is fake number one, he is not even deserving of adding sadhu, sant or sanyasi to his name so forget about Shankaracharya,” Swami Sri Govindananda Saraswati Maharaj said.
58:24

🔥Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati is fake baba and a Congress toy, slams Priyanka Vadra for calling him Shankaracharya despite SC stay order🔥🚩🔥 Govindananda Maharaj said, “This is for everyone, Congress, BJP, all CMs and the PM, HM and everyone who is supporting Avimukteshwaranand… The Congress party is giving complete support to Avimukteshwaranand… When our Guruji became ‘Brahmleen’, these people asked for a letter to Congress. The Congress issued a letter and Avimukteshwaranand reached the Supreme Court. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra wrote a letter on September 13, 2022, addressing him as revered Sankharachayra Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati Ji. How did Priyanka Gandhi Vadra write a letter addressing Avimukteshwaranand as the Shankaracharya when the Supreme Court had issued a stay?” Will Congress decide who the Shankaracharya is? He is standing against Narendra Modi and who is backing him? Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. Avimukteshwaranand will stand with Rahul Gandhi when he makes anti-Hindu remarks. Why? This letter is the reason. The Congress is playing a game and Avimukteshwaranand is the toy. I want to ask Priyanka Gandhi Vadra that she should either issue a public apology for writing this letter or we will file a contempt in the Supreme Court against her.” “One fake baba called Mukteshwaranand is getting popular these days. PM Modi has touched his feet and a big businessman like Anil Ambani welcomed him to his home. Some people on TV are giving him the tag of ‘Shankaracharya’. I want to give this message to all the citizens of the country that Mukteshwaranand is fake number one, he is not even deserving of adding sadhu, sant or sanyasi to his name so forget about Shankaracharya,” Swami Sri Govindananda Saraswati Maharaj said.

JIX5A

15,005 次观看 • 8 个月前

PROUD OF U UP POLICE #MaghMela Admñ 🫡 UP-YOGI Govt in no mood to forgive Priyanka Vadra certified 'Dharm Ka Thekedar' after DELIBERATE acts to disturb Magh Mela. Reportedly, 2ND NOTICE SENT TO ALLEGED SHANKARACHARYA🔥 —It accuses him of disrupting the mela's arrangements and endangering public safety during the Mauni Amavasya event on January 18, 2026. —It demands an explanation within 24 hours as to why his allotted land and facilities in the mela area should not be revoked. —It also warns of a potential PERMANENT BAN on his entry to the mela. —Additionally, it reiterates concerns about his use of the "Shankaracharya" board at his camp, calling it contempt of court due to a pending Supreme Court case on the Jyotish Peeth title (this was the focus of the first notice issued around January 19-20). 'Dharm ka Thekedar' knows that legally he is trapped & started Nautanki of 'Fast until Death' till 1st notice is not withdrawn. In return, he is served 2nd Notice.😂 CONgress & SP must be very annoyed as their efforts to divide Hindus THROUGH this 'alleged' Shankaracharya are going down the drain & now all facts on his CLAIM will be out LEGALLY on paper.
1:29

PROUD OF U UP POLICE #MaghMela Admñ 🫡 UP-YOGI Govt in no mood to forgive Priyanka Vadra certified 'Dharm Ka Thekedar' after DELIBERATE acts to disturb Magh Mela. Reportedly, 2ND NOTICE SENT TO ALLEGED SHANKARACHARYA🔥 —It accuses him of disrupting the mela's arrangements and endangering public safety during the Mauni Amavasya event on January 18, 2026. —It demands an explanation within 24 hours as to why his allotted land and facilities in the mela area should not be revoked. —It also warns of a potential PERMANENT BAN on his entry to the mela. —Additionally, it reiterates concerns about his use of the "Shankaracharya" board at his camp, calling it contempt of court due to a pending Supreme Court case on the Jyotish Peeth title (this was the focus of the first notice issued around January 19-20). 'Dharm ka Thekedar' knows that legally he is trapped & started Nautanki of 'Fast until Death' till 1st notice is not withdrawn. In return, he is served 2nd Notice.😂 CONgress & SP must be very annoyed as their efforts to divide Hindus THROUGH this 'alleged' Shankaracharya are going down the drain & now all facts on his CLAIM will be out LEGALLY on paper.

BhikuMhatre

37,784 次观看 • 8 个月前

The sculptors of the Bhagavan Sri Ramlalla at Ramjanmabhoomi Mandir & the over 80-year-old Vigraha of Sri Rama Darbar at Sundar Sadan, Ayodhya are linked through a teacher-student lineage. The story of the Sri Rama Darbar Vigraha's eventual arrival in Ayodhya, decades after it was sculpted, is one of intrigue. The Vigraha is a unique creation by a master sculptor and has been connected to the Sringeri Math for nearly 80 years. The Vigraha is so exquisite that it is impossible to not get moved by its beauty. Bhagavan Sri Rama has Maata Sita sitting on his lap and tenderly holds Her. Sri Lakshmana and Sri Shatrughna fan Bhagavan with chamara and Sri Bharata stands in front devotedly with folded hands. Sri Hanuman sits in front holding Bhagavan Sri Rama’s Lotus feet and fully absorbed in it. In the middle of the 20th century, Sri M.R. Balasubramaniam from Manathattai village near Trichy, was a Chief Engineer in Public Works Department of the erstwhile Madras Presidency. He was an ardent devotee of the Jagadgurus of the Dakshinamnaya Sringeri Sri Sharada Peetam and was serving the Sringeri Math in many ways. He was instrumental in building the Ratna Garbha Ganapati temple and Shankara Matha at Sivaganga in Tamil Nadu. In 1958, the Sringeri Jagadguru had graced his residence at Manathattai and later his residence at Chennai too. Pleased with his immense devotion, the Jagadguru blessed him with the title, “Guru Bhakta Ratnam”. Sri M.R. Balasubramaniam used to frequent Sringeri to have Darshan of the Sringeri Jagadgurus. Once in 1951, he was in Sringeri to have Darshan of the renowned Jivanmukta, the 34th Shankaracharya of Sringeri, Jagadguru Sri Sri Chandrashekhara Bharati Mahaswamiji. The Mahaswamiji would often be in the state of Antarmukha and there would be occasions where devotees would wait for months together to have Darshan of the Mahaswamiji who revelled in the highest spiritual state of the bliss of the Atman. When Sri M.R. Balasubramaniam 1951, happened to meet Sri Siddhanti Siddhalinga Swami, a renowned sculptor patronized by the Mysore Maharaja. Sri Siddhalinga Swami had been waiting for a long time in Sringeri to obtain darshan of Jagadguru Sri Chandrashekara Bharati Mahaswamiji. Coming to know of this, Sri MR Balasubramanian promised to try and help him have the Darshan of the Jagadguru. Soon it transpired that both could have Darshan of the Jagadguru. The joyous Sri Siddalinga Swami asked Sri Balasubramaniam to visit his Shilpa Vidyalaya Gurukula in Mysore at the earliest opportunity. When Sri Balasubramaniam visited within a span of few months, Sri Siddalinga Swami showed him around and asked him to select any Vigraha he wished and he would give it to him as a token of gratitude for ensuring that he could have the darshan of the Sringeri Jagadguru. Sri Balasubramaniam chose an incredibly beautiful Sri Rama Vigraha that is essentially the present-day Sri Rama Darbar. Initially taken aback by this request, Sri Siddalinga Swami mentioned that he had not expected that this particular Vigraha would be chosen as it had been sculpted by him, not to be sold or given, but as a testament of his skill that had been handed down through generations. He had single-handedly worked on the Vigraha for over ten years! However, Sri Siddalinga Swami kept up his word, and had the Vigraha of Sri Rama Darbar sent to Manathattai in the summer of 1952. In all earnestness, Sri Balasubramaniam purchased a piece of land and began preparations for the construction of a temple in his beloved Manathattai agraharam. However, his efforts were beset with numerous obstacles. His son Sri B Raju, was based out of Chennai and building the temple in Manathattai did not seem possible due to domestic commitments. In recent years after his retirement, he did take some preliminary steps towards building the temple, however even this effort did not fructify. When his wife, Smt. Sujatha read about the Sringeri Sharadha Peetham establishing a new branch Math at Ayodhya, a thought crossed her mind – why not offer Sri Rama to the Sringeri Shankara Math at Ayodhya? With this thought, they came to Sringeri on August 17th 2022 to have Darshan of the Jagadgurus and to seek Their guidance. Both Sri Maha Sannidhanam and Sri Sannidhanam were very happy to and instructed them to bring the Vigraha to Sringeri at the earliest. Thus, it seemed it was pre-ordained that the sequence of events pertaining to the Vigraha began in Sringeri more than 70 years ago and again culminated in Sringeri. This is what is called Ram Leela. On January 22, 2024, the day Bhagavan Sri Ramlalla was consecrated in Ayodhya, Sringeri Jagadguru Shankaracharya Sri Sri Bharati Tirtha Mahasannidhanam and Jagadguru Sri Sannidhanam worshipped the Vigraha carved by Sri Siddalinga Swami at the same time as the Vigraha of Bhagavan Sri Ramlalla carved by Sri Arun Yogiraj, grandson of Sri Siddalinga Swami’s disciple was consecrated and worshipped at Ayodhya. Likewise, on February 10, 2025, Sringeri Jagadguru Shankaracharya Sri Vidhushekhara Bharati Mahaswamiji consecrated this Vigraha which was offered by Shilpi Siddalinga Swami as a gratitude for having been able to obtain the Darshan of Jagadguru Sri Chandrashekhara Bharati Mahaswamiji. Watch the full video of the consecration here: *-*-* Join our Official WhatsApp Channel for regular updates: The online book store - Sharada eGranthalaya: #Ayodhya #SriRama #ramjanmabhoomi #SanatanaDharma #Shankaracharya #Sringeri #Yatra #SuvarnaBharati #Dharma #sriram Arun Yogiraj
0:59

The sculptors of the Bhagavan Sri Ramlalla at Ramjanmabhoomi Mandir & the over 80-year-old Vigraha of Sri Rama Darbar at Sundar Sadan, Ayodhya are linked through a teacher-student lineage. The story of the Sri Rama Darbar Vigraha's eventual arrival in Ayodhya, decades after it was sculpted, is one of intrigue. The Vigraha is a unique creation by a master sculptor and has been connected to the Sringeri Math for nearly 80 years. The Vigraha is so exquisite that it is impossible to not get moved by its beauty. Bhagavan Sri Rama has Maata Sita sitting on his lap and tenderly holds Her. Sri Lakshmana and Sri Shatrughna fan Bhagavan with chamara and Sri Bharata stands in front devotedly with folded hands. Sri Hanuman sits in front holding Bhagavan Sri Rama’s Lotus feet and fully absorbed in it. In the middle of the 20th century, Sri M.R. Balasubramaniam from Manathattai village near Trichy, was a Chief Engineer in Public Works Department of the erstwhile Madras Presidency. He was an ardent devotee of the Jagadgurus of the Dakshinamnaya Sringeri Sri Sharada Peetam and was serving the Sringeri Math in many ways. He was instrumental in building the Ratna Garbha Ganapati temple and Shankara Matha at Sivaganga in Tamil Nadu. In 1958, the Sringeri Jagadguru had graced his residence at Manathattai and later his residence at Chennai too. Pleased with his immense devotion, the Jagadguru blessed him with the title, “Guru Bhakta Ratnam”. Sri M.R. Balasubramaniam used to frequent Sringeri to have Darshan of the Sringeri Jagadgurus. Once in 1951, he was in Sringeri to have Darshan of the renowned Jivanmukta, the 34th Shankaracharya of Sringeri, Jagadguru Sri Sri Chandrashekhara Bharati Mahaswamiji. The Mahaswamiji would often be in the state of Antarmukha and there would be occasions where devotees would wait for months together to have Darshan of the Mahaswamiji who revelled in the highest spiritual state of the bliss of the Atman. When Sri M.R. Balasubramaniam 1951, happened to meet Sri Siddhanti Siddhalinga Swami, a renowned sculptor patronized by the Mysore Maharaja. Sri Siddhalinga Swami had been waiting for a long time in Sringeri to obtain darshan of Jagadguru Sri Chandrashekara Bharati Mahaswamiji. Coming to know of this, Sri MR Balasubramanian promised to try and help him have the Darshan of the Jagadguru. Soon it transpired that both could have Darshan of the Jagadguru. The joyous Sri Siddalinga Swami asked Sri Balasubramaniam to visit his Shilpa Vidyalaya Gurukula in Mysore at the earliest opportunity. When Sri Balasubramaniam visited within a span of few months, Sri Siddalinga Swami showed him around and asked him to select any Vigraha he wished and he would give it to him as a token of gratitude for ensuring that he could have the darshan of the Sringeri Jagadguru. Sri Balasubramaniam chose an incredibly beautiful Sri Rama Vigraha that is essentially the present-day Sri Rama Darbar. Initially taken aback by this request, Sri Siddalinga Swami mentioned that he had not expected that this particular Vigraha would be chosen as it had been sculpted by him, not to be sold or given, but as a testament of his skill that had been handed down through generations. He had single-handedly worked on the Vigraha for over ten years! However, Sri Siddalinga Swami kept up his word, and had the Vigraha of Sri Rama Darbar sent to Manathattai in the summer of 1952. In all earnestness, Sri Balasubramaniam purchased a piece of land and began preparations for the construction of a temple in his beloved Manathattai agraharam. However, his efforts were beset with numerous obstacles. His son Sri B Raju, was based out of Chennai and building the temple in Manathattai did not seem possible due to domestic commitments. In recent years after his retirement, he did take some preliminary steps towards building the temple, however even this effort did not fructify. When his wife, Smt. Sujatha read about the Sringeri Sharadha Peetham establishing a new branch Math at Ayodhya, a thought crossed her mind – why not offer Sri Rama to the Sringeri Shankara Math at Ayodhya? With this thought, they came to Sringeri on August 17th 2022 to have Darshan of the Jagadgurus and to seek Their guidance. Both Sri Maha Sannidhanam and Sri Sannidhanam were very happy to and instructed them to bring the Vigraha to Sringeri at the earliest. Thus, it seemed it was pre-ordained that the sequence of events pertaining to the Vigraha began in Sringeri more than 70 years ago and again culminated in Sringeri. This is what is called Ram Leela. On January 22, 2024, the day Bhagavan Sri Ramlalla was consecrated in Ayodhya, Sringeri Jagadguru Shankaracharya Sri Sri Bharati Tirtha Mahasannidhanam and Jagadguru Sri Sannidhanam worshipped the Vigraha carved by Sri Siddalinga Swami at the same time as the Vigraha of Bhagavan Sri Ramlalla carved by Sri Arun Yogiraj, grandson of Sri Siddalinga Swami’s disciple was consecrated and worshipped at Ayodhya. Likewise, on February 10, 2025, Sringeri Jagadguru Shankaracharya Sri Vidhushekhara Bharati Mahaswamiji consecrated this Vigraha which was offered by Shilpi Siddalinga Swami as a gratitude for having been able to obtain the Darshan of Jagadguru Sri Chandrashekhara Bharati Mahaswamiji. Watch the full video of the consecration here: *-*-* Join our Official WhatsApp Channel for regular updates: The online book store - Sharada eGranthalaya: #Ayodhya #SriRama #ramjanmabhoomi #SanatanaDharma #Shankaracharya #Sringeri #Yatra #SuvarnaBharati #Dharma #sriram Arun Yogiraj

Sringeri Math

16,045 次观看 • 1 年前

Before I go any further, let me publicly confirm that the original owner of this account is in fact, the one behind it right now. Let me also confirm publicly that this person has now been fully bought and paid for by the government. Whatever his motivations may or may not have been when he initially started doing the "anonymous whistleblower" thing, he is now 100% owned and controlled by whoever was behind his arrest in August. There are many things I could say, but I'll just restrict myself to these few key points: 1. After I led the media campaign that forced the police to charge him in court instead of keeping him in the FCID dungeon, this fellow - from his cell at Kuje Prison - tried to entrap me in a scheme that would have forever destroyed my credibility and put me in legal trouble that could have followed me anywhere in the world. I trust absolutely no one, so I recorded the entire 54 minute call in the event that a day like this might come. I have uploaded the relevant 6-minute segment of it here. Another well known person here was also on this call and you can hear her voice in the recording. If she wishes to, she will identify herself. 2. The number that he used to make that call is in frame 2 below. He also used that number to reach out to multiple well wishers while he was in Kuje Prison. A contact of mine ran this number through the national SIM registration database and it turns out that it is registered to one Hassan Jibrin, whom I am made to understand is a Director at the Federal Ministry of Defense. Though I have since blocked it, I assume he is still using this number to reach out to people and solicit for money or entrap them like he tried to entrap me. Whether "Hassan Jibrin" is actually a real identity or not, what I do know is that when someone facing a major national security lawsuit is remanded in prison by the government and immediately given access to a phone, and the next thing he does is to call other people he knows are being targeted by the government and start trying to get them to commit to do something illegal and unethical, I don't need to be Albert Einstein to work out that someone is putting him up to it, and that whatever deal he was offered for his freedom most likely involved giving his captors my head in exchange for his own. 3. Since we are talking about "traitors," maybe I will release the rest of the recording where this galactic asshole lambasted Deji Adeyanju, his lawyer who was representing him pro bono, calling him a "baby lawyer" and incompetent, boasting that someone told him that "Peter Obi will hire SANs" for him. In the end, it was the same Deji who got him out on bail, after which he went and acted that drama for the cameras in the courtroom, hugging Deji as if he hadn't destroyed him behind his back. Let's also talk about "traitors" who get caught by the government after doing what they say is public interest work, and then they give up everyone who gave them information or helped them. Let's talk about the biggest traitor of 2024 who got caught up in his own web of nonsense, ended up in secret detention, and then got his brother to try to convince David Hundeyin to impersonate him, a missing person - making me an accessory to a crime in the event that he actually ended up dead, which he very nearly did. I held my tongue since September because I felt that it was not my place to destroy this PIDOM fraud, but now that your itchy fingers have carried you to where you shouldn't go, I'm only too happy to indulge you.
6:00

Before I go any further, let me publicly confirm that the original owner of this account is in fact, the one behind it right now. Let me also confirm publicly that this person has now been fully bought and paid for by the government. Whatever his motivations may or may not have been when he initially started doing the "anonymous whistleblower" thing, he is now 100% owned and controlled by whoever was behind his arrest in August. There are many things I could say, but I'll just restrict myself to these few key points: 1. After I led the media campaign that forced the police to charge him in court instead of keeping him in the FCID dungeon, this fellow - from his cell at Kuje Prison - tried to entrap me in a scheme that would have forever destroyed my credibility and put me in legal trouble that could have followed me anywhere in the world. I trust absolutely no one, so I recorded the entire 54 minute call in the event that a day like this might come. I have uploaded the relevant 6-minute segment of it here. Another well known person here was also on this call and you can hear her voice in the recording. If she wishes to, she will identify herself. 2. The number that he used to make that call is in frame 2 below. He also used that number to reach out to multiple well wishers while he was in Kuje Prison. A contact of mine ran this number through the national SIM registration database and it turns out that it is registered to one Hassan Jibrin, whom I am made to understand is a Director at the Federal Ministry of Defense. Though I have since blocked it, I assume he is still using this number to reach out to people and solicit for money or entrap them like he tried to entrap me. Whether "Hassan Jibrin" is actually a real identity or not, what I do know is that when someone facing a major national security lawsuit is remanded in prison by the government and immediately given access to a phone, and the next thing he does is to call other people he knows are being targeted by the government and start trying to get them to commit to do something illegal and unethical, I don't need to be Albert Einstein to work out that someone is putting him up to it, and that whatever deal he was offered for his freedom most likely involved giving his captors my head in exchange for his own. 3. Since we are talking about "traitors," maybe I will release the rest of the recording where this galactic asshole lambasted Deji Adeyanju, his lawyer who was representing him pro bono, calling him a "baby lawyer" and incompetent, boasting that someone told him that "Peter Obi will hire SANs" for him. In the end, it was the same Deji who got him out on bail, after which he went and acted that drama for the cameras in the courtroom, hugging Deji as if he hadn't destroyed him behind his back. Let's also talk about "traitors" who get caught by the government after doing what they say is public interest work, and then they give up everyone who gave them information or helped them. Let's talk about the biggest traitor of 2024 who got caught up in his own web of nonsense, ended up in secret detention, and then got his brother to try to convince David Hundeyin to impersonate him, a missing person - making me an accessory to a crime in the event that he actually ended up dead, which he very nearly did. I held my tongue since September because I felt that it was not my place to destroy this PIDOM fraud, but now that your itchy fingers have carried you to where you shouldn't go, I'm only too happy to indulge you.

David Hundeyin

995,126 次观看 • 1 年前

FREE CHUD ChudTheBuilder Dalton Eatherly This is the full initial hearing where General sessions judge H. Reid Poland III issued a $1.25M bond on May 15th following the self defense shooting outside the Clarksville courthouse 2 days prior. Does this look like an “honorable public servant” to you? How about a monitor lizard with that gullet? How about a tiny hat evangelical tyrant with pockets greased with lard? “If you interrupt this hearing you’ll be charged with contempt and thrown in jail for 10 days” and how about that psychotic power tripping smile after he said that?… Judge Reid keeps repeating Dalton is out on “multiple bonds for multiple cases” when his only other charge is a misdemeanor in Davidson county for not paying a $400 bill after restaurant staff kicked him out of the establishment after receiving phone calls from swatters. He also mentions this as a case of criminal homicide and not self defense from Joshua fox chasing Dalton across the street to continue assaulting him after he had walked away to deescalate. From an unbiased point of view, there were 7 spent casings recovered from the scene (even though only 2 hit Joshua once in the shoulder and one in the gut) hence the charge for reckless endangerment, one probably would have done enough to stop Joshua fox but then again there has been no news on if Joshua was armed or not or claims that Dalton saw or thought he saw a firearm which in that case, like anybody, you would want to make sure someone was fully incapacitated. Today on may 21st during the hearing it has come to light that daltons truck and home were searched (unclear if a warrant was issued by a judge) in where his firearms and electronic devices were confiscated as evidence without any probable cause for search and seizure. In this search what stood out was an airline ticket to Istanbul turkey set for tomorrow may 22nd which I believe is a plant to sow dissent among his supporters but they have also placed a gag order on him so if he gets out he still cannot say “I didn’t buy a ticket to turkey this is a set up” because they will just throw him back in jail in violation of his gag order, not to mention he’s already been debanked but they are preventing him from bond as his phone is confiscated for evidence which prevents him from accessing funds from his GiveSendGo account. So what do you think? Is this judge protecting the public by giving Dalton a 1.25M bond, issuing warrantless search and seizures and gag orders while giving a black man with premeditated intent to kill in a seperate case only a 250k bond or is this judge trying to (or told to) make an example of Dalton for exercising his first amendment and putting his entire life on trial? My sentiments remain the same. Niggers are terrorists and even the well mannered black people need to go back to Africa as they are segregationist all the same and unAmerican according to our founders in the 1790 naturalisation act. I also think the bigger threat to public safety are these corrupt courts all across the nation who serve only their private prison industrial complex for tax laundering and allowing crime ridden areas to fester as a steady revenue stream
5:43

FREE CHUD ChudTheBuilder Dalton Eatherly This is the full initial hearing where General sessions judge H. Reid Poland III issued a $1.25M bond on May 15th following the self defense shooting outside the Clarksville courthouse 2 days prior. Does this look like an “honorable public servant” to you? How about a monitor lizard with that gullet? How about a tiny hat evangelical tyrant with pockets greased with lard? “If you interrupt this hearing you’ll be charged with contempt and thrown in jail for 10 days” and how about that psychotic power tripping smile after he said that?… Judge Reid keeps repeating Dalton is out on “multiple bonds for multiple cases” when his only other charge is a misdemeanor in Davidson county for not paying a $400 bill after restaurant staff kicked him out of the establishment after receiving phone calls from swatters. He also mentions this as a case of criminal homicide and not self defense from Joshua fox chasing Dalton across the street to continue assaulting him after he had walked away to deescalate. From an unbiased point of view, there were 7 spent casings recovered from the scene (even though only 2 hit Joshua once in the shoulder and one in the gut) hence the charge for reckless endangerment, one probably would have done enough to stop Joshua fox but then again there has been no news on if Joshua was armed or not or claims that Dalton saw or thought he saw a firearm which in that case, like anybody, you would want to make sure someone was fully incapacitated. Today on may 21st during the hearing it has come to light that daltons truck and home were searched (unclear if a warrant was issued by a judge) in where his firearms and electronic devices were confiscated as evidence without any probable cause for search and seizure. In this search what stood out was an airline ticket to Istanbul turkey set for tomorrow may 22nd which I believe is a plant to sow dissent among his supporters but they have also placed a gag order on him so if he gets out he still cannot say “I didn’t buy a ticket to turkey this is a set up” because they will just throw him back in jail in violation of his gag order, not to mention he’s already been debanked but they are preventing him from bond as his phone is confiscated for evidence which prevents him from accessing funds from his GiveSendGo account. So what do you think? Is this judge protecting the public by giving Dalton a 1.25M bond, issuing warrantless search and seizures and gag orders while giving a black man with premeditated intent to kill in a seperate case only a 250k bond or is this judge trying to (or told to) make an example of Dalton for exercising his first amendment and putting his entire life on trial? My sentiments remain the same. Niggers are terrorists and even the well mannered black people need to go back to Africa as they are segregationist all the same and unAmerican according to our founders in the 1790 naturalisation act. I also think the bigger threat to public safety are these corrupt courts all across the nation who serve only their private prison industrial complex for tax laundering and allowing crime ridden areas to fester as a steady revenue stream

Tristan Cunningham

71,641 次观看 • 4 个月前

#new Clancy Defense Attorney Asked Internet Blogger For Help Making Lindsay Look Innocent,Turtleboy Says Fast Fact: Kevin Reddington reportedly asked Aidan Kearney (Turtleboy) for help on the Lindsay Clancy case in July 2023, according to Turtleboy's website and social media posts Critics say it is a major ethical violation to enlist the help of a social media blogger to help create a perception of innocence about a client that Reddington was (and still is) representing. In messages shared by Kearney, Reddington praised Kearney because he 'created' Karen Read's innocence. Karen Read is the woman who was accused of klling her police officer boyfriend, but claimed she was being framed by his friends, who were also cops and the ones she claims actually k*lled him. Karen Read was acquitted of second-degree m*rder and manslaughter. 🔶On July 22, 2023 - Reddington was already on the Clancy case, and also representing Jennifer McCabe in the Read case. (McCabe was the woman that Read claims was trying to frame her) 🔶Screenshots show a Messenger account labeled Kevin Reddington writing to Kearney late at night. 🔶The message praised Kearney for being a great investigative reporter, while saying they started off on the wrong foot. 🔶The account then asked Kearney to help with the Clancy case. Other messages in the same thread detailed how Kearney created “more than reasonable doubt” for Karen Read. Kearney replied the next morning saying he was already on the Clancy case and said Patrick Clancy was the strongest person he had seen, “followed by Karen Read.” Kearney posted the messages on his website in September of 2023 under the title: 🔶"Reddington thought Read was innocent and “could use my help defending his client, Lindsay Clancy.” Critics say this is an ethical violation for a defense attorney to enlist the help of an online blogger - who was already facing legal trouble for jury intimidation - to sway public opinion about a client he is representing. So what is the jury intimidation? Well it stems from the Karen Read case. Oct. 11, 2023 – Kearney was: ➡️Arrested on multiple counts of witness intimidation / conspiracy tied to witnesses in the Karen Read trial. ➡️He was indicted Dec. 2023 - 8 counts of witness intimidation, 3 counts of conspiracy, and 5 counts of picketing a witness ➡️He Pleaded not guilty, and a trial set for December of this year. 2. He was arrested in late December when: ➡️His ex-girlfriend Lindsey Gaetani alleged he attacked her and threatened to release nude photos of her after she was summoned to a grand jury about him. ➡️He was charged with domestic assault and battery and witness intimidation. ➡️Bail on the Read case was revoked. He did about 60 days in the Norfolk County jail. ➡️Oct. 22, 2025: Charges dropped after the special prosecutor quit, and no replacement was appointed. This was not an acquittal; just a lucky break for Kearney 3. In 2024 – he was: ➡️Charged with violating an abuse-prevention order. ➡️June 12, 2025: Judge Michael Pomarole found him not guilty after a two-day bench trial. The one-year RO was not extended in Jan. 2025. 4. May 13, 2025 - third indictment Two more witness intimidation counts after he stopped at D&E Pizza and caused a scene. ➡️Pleaded not guilty. This is part of the remaining pending charges. 5. July 2026 - Atlantic County, New Jersey indictment (sealed) ➡️His lawyer Mark Bederow said NJ indicted him on a civilian complaint from a woman who contacted him about humiliating John O’Keefe’s brother. Some claim that Reddington knew Kearney's methods and wanted him to impact the jury pool in the Clancy case as well - however there is no proof of that. 🔶Another message Kearney posted is one from the Reddington account that said he believed Karen Read was innocent –to which Kearney posted with this comment: 🔶“Kevin Reddington messaged me a month or so ago to tell me thta [sic] he believes Karen Read is innocent, which by default means that his client Jennifer McCabe was involved in covering up John O'Keefe's m*rder.” Which is also very interesting. Reddington has not admitted that the messages were sent by him, but he hasn't denied it either. 🔶In April 2023 (about three months before the friendly message exchange) Reddington left a public comment on Turtleboy’s Facebook page calling him “turd boy” and saying he wanted to “dance” with him in court. They later shook hands in a courthouse, according to Kearney. In the Clancy case Reddington took aim at the lone holdout juror himself when he thanked “these jurors”. Minus one.” He said the other 11 had been “robbed by one man, for whatever his agenda was,” who “stole seven weeks” from people who “were so attentive, so beautiful, so wonderful.” Then: “I hope that guy can sleep well at night.” He accused the juror of being a bigot, gender--doxxed him and tried to get the judge to reveal his identity by holding an open court questioning. Leading many to claim jury intimidation is part of Reddington’s MO – which is why he reached out to Kearney in the first place. He saw what Kearney did for Karen Read, and he wanted him do the same thing for Clancy – again, this is a claim and not a proven fact. Jonathan Turley called Reddington’s attack on the juror “utterly reprehensible” and said Reddington “put a target on the back of a juror who committed the unpardonable sin of not being convinced by his arguments.” And now, after all this mess, the local NBC Boston report releasing searchable data about the holdout juror, the doxxing of that juror via photos, name, and details about his personal life - Judge Sullivan – in the Clancy case, has extended the lock down on the jury list indefinitely. Sullivan was petitioned by a juror to keep the list sealed, and ruled there is credible fear for the jurors. What do you think? Should a defense attorney be able to enlist the help of an online blogger to 'create' an innocent view of his client before the jury is even selected? #ChristinaAguayoNews
6:04

#new Clancy Defense Attorney Asked Internet Blogger For Help Making Lindsay Look Innocent,Turtleboy Says Fast Fact: Kevin Reddington reportedly asked Aidan Kearney (Turtleboy) for help on the Lindsay Clancy case in July 2023, according to Turtleboy's website and social media posts Critics say it is a major ethical violation to enlist the help of a social media blogger to help create a perception of innocence about a client that Reddington was (and still is) representing. In messages shared by Kearney, Reddington praised Kearney because he 'created' Karen Read's innocence. Karen Read is the woman who was accused of klling her police officer boyfriend, but claimed she was being framed by his friends, who were also cops and the ones she claims actually k*lled him. Karen Read was acquitted of second-degree m*rder and manslaughter. 🔶On July 22, 2023 - Reddington was already on the Clancy case, and also representing Jennifer McCabe in the Read case. (McCabe was the woman that Read claims was trying to frame her) 🔶Screenshots show a Messenger account labeled Kevin Reddington writing to Kearney late at night. 🔶The message praised Kearney for being a great investigative reporter, while saying they started off on the wrong foot. 🔶The account then asked Kearney to help with the Clancy case. Other messages in the same thread detailed how Kearney created “more than reasonable doubt” for Karen Read. Kearney replied the next morning saying he was already on the Clancy case and said Patrick Clancy was the strongest person he had seen, “followed by Karen Read.” Kearney posted the messages on his website in September of 2023 under the title: 🔶"Reddington thought Read was innocent and “could use my help defending his client, Lindsay Clancy.” Critics say this is an ethical violation for a defense attorney to enlist the help of an online blogger - who was already facing legal trouble for jury intimidation - to sway public opinion about a client he is representing. So what is the jury intimidation? Well it stems from the Karen Read case. Oct. 11, 2023 – Kearney was: ➡️Arrested on multiple counts of witness intimidation / conspiracy tied to witnesses in the Karen Read trial. ➡️He was indicted Dec. 2023 - 8 counts of witness intimidation, 3 counts of conspiracy, and 5 counts of picketing a witness ➡️He Pleaded not guilty, and a trial set for December of this year. 2. He was arrested in late December when: ➡️His ex-girlfriend Lindsey Gaetani alleged he attacked her and threatened to release nude photos of her after she was summoned to a grand jury about him. ➡️He was charged with domestic assault and battery and witness intimidation. ➡️Bail on the Read case was revoked. He did about 60 days in the Norfolk County jail. ➡️Oct. 22, 2025: Charges dropped after the special prosecutor quit, and no replacement was appointed. This was not an acquittal; just a lucky break for Kearney 3. In 2024 – he was: ➡️Charged with violating an abuse-prevention order. ➡️June 12, 2025: Judge Michael Pomarole found him not guilty after a two-day bench trial. The one-year RO was not extended in Jan. 2025. 4. May 13, 2025 - third indictment Two more witness intimidation counts after he stopped at D&E Pizza and caused a scene. ➡️Pleaded not guilty. This is part of the remaining pending charges. 5. July 2026 - Atlantic County, New Jersey indictment (sealed) ➡️His lawyer Mark Bederow said NJ indicted him on a civilian complaint from a woman who contacted him about humiliating John O’Keefe’s brother. Some claim that Reddington knew Kearney's methods and wanted him to impact the jury pool in the Clancy case as well - however there is no proof of that. 🔶Another message Kearney posted is one from the Reddington account that said he believed Karen Read was innocent –to which Kearney posted with this comment: 🔶“Kevin Reddington messaged me a month or so ago to tell me thta [sic] he believes Karen Read is innocent, which by default means that his client Jennifer McCabe was involved in covering up John O'Keefe's m*rder.” Which is also very interesting. Reddington has not admitted that the messages were sent by him, but he hasn't denied it either. 🔶In April 2023 (about three months before the friendly message exchange) Reddington left a public comment on Turtleboy’s Facebook page calling him “turd boy” and saying he wanted to “dance” with him in court. They later shook hands in a courthouse, according to Kearney. In the Clancy case Reddington took aim at the lone holdout juror himself when he thanked “these jurors”. Minus one.” He said the other 11 had been “robbed by one man, for whatever his agenda was,” who “stole seven weeks” from people who “were so attentive, so beautiful, so wonderful.” Then: “I hope that guy can sleep well at night.” He accused the juror of being a bigot, gender--doxxed him and tried to get the judge to reveal his identity by holding an open court questioning. Leading many to claim jury intimidation is part of Reddington’s MO – which is why he reached out to Kearney in the first place. He saw what Kearney did for Karen Read, and he wanted him do the same thing for Clancy – again, this is a claim and not a proven fact. Jonathan Turley called Reddington’s attack on the juror “utterly reprehensible” and said Reddington “put a target on the back of a juror who committed the unpardonable sin of not being convinced by his arguments.” And now, after all this mess, the local NBC Boston report releasing searchable data about the holdout juror, the doxxing of that juror via photos, name, and details about his personal life - Judge Sullivan – in the Clancy case, has extended the lock down on the jury list indefinitely. Sullivan was petitioned by a juror to keep the list sealed, and ruled there is credible fear for the jurors. What do you think? Should a defense attorney be able to enlist the help of an online blogger to 'create' an innocent view of his client before the jury is even selected? #ChristinaAguayoNews

Christina Aguayo

29,635 次观看 • 15 天前

Damage Control From a Mayor Who Has Everything to Fear The national grooming gang inquiry has not yet begun. But the political effort to control it already has. As predicted, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham publicly rebuked critics of the inquiry's new chair, urging them to stop "reading politics into it" and to "let the inquiry do its business." Damage control from a man who has everything to fear from what this inquiry might expose. Burnham is not some outside observer. He is neck-deep in this scandal's recent history. As mayor, he commissioned, promoted and defended the Oldham Assurance Review. A whitewash sold to the public as independent but designed from the start to avoid the most serious evidence of institutional failure. That review was not botched incompetence. It was a cover up. Look at what it actually did: - it cleared political figures of wrongdoing - it refused to interview a single Pakistani grooming gang survivor - it accepted political explanations without testing them against evidence - it concluded there was no cover up despite confirming children were gang raped, public officials and politicians knew what was taking place, and information was hidden from parents. There is no plausible explanation for clearing politicians while excluding the most relevant survivors other than protection. Burnham knows exactly what he faces. He commissioned a review that cleared his allies while silencing survivors. He defended a process that excluded Pakistani rape gang victims. His review was used to block any further inquiry. Now he is desperately trying to manage expectations before the real investigation begins. Burnham thinks containing the inquiry's scope will protect him. He is wrong. The evidence of his role in commissioning institutional cover-up is already established. The only question is whether this inquiry will have the independence to follow where that evidence leads and call Burnham to testify under oath. Burnham's intervention is not defending justice. It is defending himself. And he has every reason to be afraid. And for those that have asked. All Andy Burnham has to do is name the time and place. I will present the evidence of his role in the cover up of the industrial scale gang rape of children to his face if he dares face me. _________ I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe or support here: If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that shutting this down becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need enough. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE
16:59

Damage Control From a Mayor Who Has Everything to Fear The national grooming gang inquiry has not yet begun. But the political effort to control it already has. As predicted, Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham publicly rebuked critics of the inquiry's new chair, urging them to stop "reading politics into it" and to "let the inquiry do its business." Damage control from a man who has everything to fear from what this inquiry might expose. Burnham is not some outside observer. He is neck-deep in this scandal's recent history. As mayor, he commissioned, promoted and defended the Oldham Assurance Review. A whitewash sold to the public as independent but designed from the start to avoid the most serious evidence of institutional failure. That review was not botched incompetence. It was a cover up. Look at what it actually did: - it cleared political figures of wrongdoing - it refused to interview a single Pakistani grooming gang survivor - it accepted political explanations without testing them against evidence - it concluded there was no cover up despite confirming children were gang raped, public officials and politicians knew what was taking place, and information was hidden from parents. There is no plausible explanation for clearing politicians while excluding the most relevant survivors other than protection. Burnham knows exactly what he faces. He commissioned a review that cleared his allies while silencing survivors. He defended a process that excluded Pakistani rape gang victims. His review was used to block any further inquiry. Now he is desperately trying to manage expectations before the real investigation begins. Burnham thinks containing the inquiry's scope will protect him. He is wrong. The evidence of his role in commissioning institutional cover-up is already established. The only question is whether this inquiry will have the independence to follow where that evidence leads and call Burnham to testify under oath. Burnham's intervention is not defending justice. It is defending himself. And he has every reason to be afraid. And for those that have asked. All Andy Burnham has to do is name the time and place. I will present the evidence of his role in the cover up of the industrial scale gang rape of children to his face if he dares face me. _________ I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe or support here: If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that shutting this down becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need enough. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

20,644 次观看 • 9 个月前

When Asked About Girls’ Safety, Andy Burnham Looked Away Make no mistake about what you witnessed last week. Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester and Labour’s would-be Prime Minister, was asked a simple question. Would he put the safety of girls before the fear of upsetting people. He did not answer it. What followed was his full ten-minute monologue. This was not leadership under pressure. It was evasion under scrutiny. A stage-managed performance in a familiar setting, chaired sympathetically, designed to avoid the one thing that mattered. A clear answer. So look instead at what Andy Burnham actually did. His defence rests on commissioning the “largest, longest-running inquiry.” What he does not say is that from the outset; - it had no power to compel evidence - Its terms of reference were set by institutions facing allegations - Even the review team depended on Oldham Council and Greater Manchester Police to decide which documents they were allowed to see. He then dismisses credible concerns about Oldham as “rumours.” Yet his own Assurance Review later confirmed that children in Oldham had been groomed and gang raped. Every case his experts examined confirmed this. Even then, the full extent of that abuse was obscured. To this day, we do not know how many little White girls in Oldham were dragged off the streets and gang raped by Pakistani men. Despite knowing both the truth of those concerns and the limits of his own review, Burnham still refused to call for a national inquiry that could have exposed who failed these children and why. Instead, he and his Labour Party allies hid behind a finding of “no evidence of a cover-up,” while having explicitly ruled out investigating whether a cover-up had taken place. Only years later, after relentless campaigning and global attention forced the issue back into the open, did Burnham finally support national action. And when confronted with this record, he does not answer it. He accuses his critics of spreading hate. A full article will follow. If you still need convincing, you will then understand why this would-be Prime Minister refuses to face scrutiny in the open. He knows exactly what would happen if he were challenged directly on what he was part of. So let there be no ambiguity. The allegation facing Andy Burnham is his role in the cover-up of the industrial-scale gang rape of the nation’s children. Name the time and place Andy Burnham. Face me. Face the millions who want to know who is telling the truth. ________ I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe here: If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that covering this up becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE
9:59

When Asked About Girls’ Safety, Andy Burnham Looked Away Make no mistake about what you witnessed last week. Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester and Labour’s would-be Prime Minister, was asked a simple question. Would he put the safety of girls before the fear of upsetting people. He did not answer it. What followed was his full ten-minute monologue. This was not leadership under pressure. It was evasion under scrutiny. A stage-managed performance in a familiar setting, chaired sympathetically, designed to avoid the one thing that mattered. A clear answer. So look instead at what Andy Burnham actually did. His defence rests on commissioning the “largest, longest-running inquiry.” What he does not say is that from the outset; - it had no power to compel evidence - Its terms of reference were set by institutions facing allegations - Even the review team depended on Oldham Council and Greater Manchester Police to decide which documents they were allowed to see. He then dismisses credible concerns about Oldham as “rumours.” Yet his own Assurance Review later confirmed that children in Oldham had been groomed and gang raped. Every case his experts examined confirmed this. Even then, the full extent of that abuse was obscured. To this day, we do not know how many little White girls in Oldham were dragged off the streets and gang raped by Pakistani men. Despite knowing both the truth of those concerns and the limits of his own review, Burnham still refused to call for a national inquiry that could have exposed who failed these children and why. Instead, he and his Labour Party allies hid behind a finding of “no evidence of a cover-up,” while having explicitly ruled out investigating whether a cover-up had taken place. Only years later, after relentless campaigning and global attention forced the issue back into the open, did Burnham finally support national action. And when confronted with this record, he does not answer it. He accuses his critics of spreading hate. A full article will follow. If you still need convincing, you will then understand why this would-be Prime Minister refuses to face scrutiny in the open. He knows exactly what would happen if he were challenged directly on what he was part of. So let there be no ambiguity. The allegation facing Andy Burnham is his role in the cover-up of the industrial-scale gang rape of the nation’s children. Name the time and place Andy Burnham. Face me. Face the millions who want to know who is telling the truth. ________ I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe here: If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that covering this up becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

85,206 次观看 • 8 个月前

“A Wizard Is Never Late” In the scene where Gandalf meets Frodo in the Shire, Frodo teases him for being late. Gandalf replies: “A wizard is never late, Frodo Baggins. Nor is he early.” He then concludes that a wizard always arrives at precisely the time he means to. At first glance, this is simply a humorous remark, perfectly in keeping with Gandalf’s character. But when I place it alongside his other words throughout The Lord of the Rings, I feel that the line opens up a deeper way of looking at the character. Gandalf is not someone who knows the entire future in advance. But he is aware that he is carrying out a mission greater than himself, and that what happens in Middle-earth does not lie entirely within the control of any individual. So the question I want to ask is: when Gandalf says that he is neither late nor early, but arrives at the right time, what does “the right time” actually mean to him? Other forces are at work One of the lines that draws my attention most is what Gandalf says about Bilbo finding the Ring. In the novel, Gandalf says: “Behind that there was something else at work, beyond any design of the Ring-maker. I can put it no plainer than by saying that Bilbo was meant to find the Ring, and not by its maker. In which case you also were meant to have it.” I am especially struck by the phrase: “was meant to.” Bilbo was meant to find the Ring. And if that was so, Frodo was also meant to have it. What is interesting is that Gandalf does not explain the Ring coming into Bilbo’s possession simply as an accident. He senses that something lies behind the event, something beyond the intention of the very maker of the Ring. In the film, this idea is expressed more briefly. Gandalf says: “There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the evil.” There are other forces at work in this world besides evil. In the way I see it, this is one of the most important lines for understanding how Gandalf views the world. Sauron has his own will. The Ring has its own power and purpose. Bilbo, Frodo, Gollum, and the others still have choices of their own. But at the same time, Gandalf recognizes that other forces are at work beyond the control of any individual. He knows that he exists within a greater order than himself. Gandalf knows much, but he does not know everything This becomes even clearer when he speaks about Gollum. Frodo regrets that Bilbo did not kill Gollum when he had the chance. But Gandalf does not agree with this way of seeing things: “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends... My heart tells me that he has some part to play yet, for good or ill, before the end.” The words that stand out to me most are: “Even the very wise cannot see all ends.” Even the wisest cannot see every outcome. This is important. Gandalf does not know what Gollum will ultimately do. He only senses that Gollum still has some part to play before the story comes to an end. And this is precisely where I see Gandalf as different from a character who “knows everything in advance.” He sees more than Frodo does. But he also knows that what he sees is only part of the whole. He does not give himself the right to determine Gollum’s entire fate, because he understands that there are outcomes even he cannot yet see. This connects directly to Bilbo. Gandalf says: “The pity of Bilbo may rule the fate of many.” Bilbo could not have known that when he spared Gollum. He simply chose not to kill a creature he felt pity for. Yet that choice later became one link in a story far greater than Bilbo himself. This is the part I find especially beautiful: An individual can still choose freely, yet cannot know the full meaning that their choice will eventually create. Therefore, the existence of a greater order does not necessarily turn the characters into puppets. Bilbo still chooses. Frodo still chooses. Gandalf still chooses. But those choices can become woven into a story greater than the people who make them. Gandalf as a servant When Gandalf faces the Balrog, he says: “I am a servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the flame of Anor.” I am especially struck by one word: “servant.” Gandalf is a being of great power. Yet he does not introduce himself as the ultimate master of that power. He calls himself a servant. This fits Gandalf’s place in Tolkien’s world: he was sent to Middle-earth to carry out a mission. His power, therefore, is not an end in itself. He does not possess power simply so that he can do whatever he wants. His power is connected to a mission. This becomes even clearer after his confrontation with the Balrog. In the novel, Gandalf says: “Naked I was sent back — for a brief time, until my task is done.” The important words here are: “sent back.” He was sent back. And he returned: “until my task is done.” Gandalf did not decide for himself to return. He was sent back and continued his task. I do not want to take this line too far by claiming that Gandalf knew the exact details of the entire plan behind his return. What we can say more confidently is that Gandalf himself understands his return as having been sent back so that he may continue and complete his task. This fits the image of Gandalf throughout the story: He has a task, but he does not see the entire outcome. He knows that he is serving something greater, yet he still has to choose how to carry out his part. The circumstances are given, but the choice remains ours This is expressed very clearly when Frodo says: “I wish the Ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.” Gandalf replies: “So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.” Here, I see two beautiful layers: The circumstances are given. The actions are chosen. Frodo cannot choose the age into which he was born. He cannot choose whether the Ring will appear. But Gandalf does not say that Frodo therefore has no choice. He says that what we can decide is what we will do with the time that is given to us. In The Return of the King, Gandalf also says: “It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set...” We are not meant to master all the tides of the world, but to do what lies within our power during the years in which we have been placed. These two lines complement each other very clearly: We do not control the whole of our circumstances, but we are still responsible for our part in them. In the way I see it, this is where providence and free will meet. Gandalf is not someone who simply sits back and waits for everything to happen according to a script he already knows. He still has to observe, judge, and choose. But neither does he act as an individual completely separate from a greater order. So what can “A wizard is never late” mean? After placing this line beside Gandalf’s other words, I begin to feel that “the right time” may carry a deeper meaning. Gandalf is not someone who knows the entire future. He himself admits: “Even the very wise cannot see all ends.” At the same time, he recognizes that the world does not operate solely according to the wishes of the individuals living within it. Bilbo was “meant to” find the Ring. There are “other forces at work.” Gandalf calls himself a “servant.” And when he returns to Middle-earth, he says that he was “sent back” until his task is complete. These words make me feel that Gandalf understands something very clearly: he can choose how he acts, but he is not the master of the entire story. He has a task. He has his part to play. But he does not know the full outcome to which that part will lead. So when Frodo tells Gandalf that he is late, Gandalf does not need to prove that he knows the future. He simply sees that moment from a different perspective. To Frodo, time is measured by when Gandalf should have arrived. To Gandalf, the important moment may be when he needs to be there to do what he is meant to do. And that is why, for me, the line: “A wizard is never late. Nor is he early.” is no longer merely a joke. It can be understood as a glimpse into the way Gandalf sees his place within a story greater than himself. He does not know the whole future. He does not control the entire course of the world. He simply knows that he is serving something greater, and that he must do his part when the time comes. Perhaps that is why, in the very same moment, Frodo sees a Gandalf who is late. While Gandalf sees himself as arriving precisely on time.
5:04

“A Wizard Is Never Late” In the scene where Gandalf meets Frodo in the Shire, Frodo teases him for being late. Gandalf replies: “A wizard is never late, Frodo Baggins. Nor is he early.” He then concludes that a wizard always arrives at precisely the time he means to. At first glance, this is simply a humorous remark, perfectly in keeping with Gandalf’s character. But when I place it alongside his other words throughout The Lord of the Rings, I feel that the line opens up a deeper way of looking at the character. Gandalf is not someone who knows the entire future in advance. But he is aware that he is carrying out a mission greater than himself, and that what happens in Middle-earth does not lie entirely within the control of any individual. So the question I want to ask is: when Gandalf says that he is neither late nor early, but arrives at the right time, what does “the right time” actually mean to him? Other forces are at work One of the lines that draws my attention most is what Gandalf says about Bilbo finding the Ring. In the novel, Gandalf says: “Behind that there was something else at work, beyond any design of the Ring-maker. I can put it no plainer than by saying that Bilbo was meant to find the Ring, and not by its maker. In which case you also were meant to have it.” I am especially struck by the phrase: “was meant to.” Bilbo was meant to find the Ring. And if that was so, Frodo was also meant to have it. What is interesting is that Gandalf does not explain the Ring coming into Bilbo’s possession simply as an accident. He senses that something lies behind the event, something beyond the intention of the very maker of the Ring. In the film, this idea is expressed more briefly. Gandalf says: “There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the evil.” There are other forces at work in this world besides evil. In the way I see it, this is one of the most important lines for understanding how Gandalf views the world. Sauron has his own will. The Ring has its own power and purpose. Bilbo, Frodo, Gollum, and the others still have choices of their own. But at the same time, Gandalf recognizes that other forces are at work beyond the control of any individual. He knows that he exists within a greater order than himself. Gandalf knows much, but he does not know everything This becomes even clearer when he speaks about Gollum. Frodo regrets that Bilbo did not kill Gollum when he had the chance. But Gandalf does not agree with this way of seeing things: “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends... My heart tells me that he has some part to play yet, for good or ill, before the end.” The words that stand out to me most are: “Even the very wise cannot see all ends.” Even the wisest cannot see every outcome. This is important. Gandalf does not know what Gollum will ultimately do. He only senses that Gollum still has some part to play before the story comes to an end. And this is precisely where I see Gandalf as different from a character who “knows everything in advance.” He sees more than Frodo does. But he also knows that what he sees is only part of the whole. He does not give himself the right to determine Gollum’s entire fate, because he understands that there are outcomes even he cannot yet see. This connects directly to Bilbo. Gandalf says: “The pity of Bilbo may rule the fate of many.” Bilbo could not have known that when he spared Gollum. He simply chose not to kill a creature he felt pity for. Yet that choice later became one link in a story far greater than Bilbo himself. This is the part I find especially beautiful: An individual can still choose freely, yet cannot know the full meaning that their choice will eventually create. Therefore, the existence of a greater order does not necessarily turn the characters into puppets. Bilbo still chooses. Frodo still chooses. Gandalf still chooses. But those choices can become woven into a story greater than the people who make them. Gandalf as a servant When Gandalf faces the Balrog, he says: “I am a servant of the Secret Fire, wielder of the flame of Anor.” I am especially struck by one word: “servant.” Gandalf is a being of great power. Yet he does not introduce himself as the ultimate master of that power. He calls himself a servant. This fits Gandalf’s place in Tolkien’s world: he was sent to Middle-earth to carry out a mission. His power, therefore, is not an end in itself. He does not possess power simply so that he can do whatever he wants. His power is connected to a mission. This becomes even clearer after his confrontation with the Balrog. In the novel, Gandalf says: “Naked I was sent back — for a brief time, until my task is done.” The important words here are: “sent back.” He was sent back. And he returned: “until my task is done.” Gandalf did not decide for himself to return. He was sent back and continued his task. I do not want to take this line too far by claiming that Gandalf knew the exact details of the entire plan behind his return. What we can say more confidently is that Gandalf himself understands his return as having been sent back so that he may continue and complete his task. This fits the image of Gandalf throughout the story: He has a task, but he does not see the entire outcome. He knows that he is serving something greater, yet he still has to choose how to carry out his part. The circumstances are given, but the choice remains ours This is expressed very clearly when Frodo says: “I wish the Ring had never come to me. I wish none of this had happened.” Gandalf replies: “So do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.” Here, I see two beautiful layers: The circumstances are given. The actions are chosen. Frodo cannot choose the age into which he was born. He cannot choose whether the Ring will appear. But Gandalf does not say that Frodo therefore has no choice. He says that what we can decide is what we will do with the time that is given to us. In The Return of the King, Gandalf also says: “It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set...” We are not meant to master all the tides of the world, but to do what lies within our power during the years in which we have been placed. These two lines complement each other very clearly: We do not control the whole of our circumstances, but we are still responsible for our part in them. In the way I see it, this is where providence and free will meet. Gandalf is not someone who simply sits back and waits for everything to happen according to a script he already knows. He still has to observe, judge, and choose. But neither does he act as an individual completely separate from a greater order. So what can “A wizard is never late” mean? After placing this line beside Gandalf’s other words, I begin to feel that “the right time” may carry a deeper meaning. Gandalf is not someone who knows the entire future. He himself admits: “Even the very wise cannot see all ends.” At the same time, he recognizes that the world does not operate solely according to the wishes of the individuals living within it. Bilbo was “meant to” find the Ring. There are “other forces at work.” Gandalf calls himself a “servant.” And when he returns to Middle-earth, he says that he was “sent back” until his task is complete. These words make me feel that Gandalf understands something very clearly: he can choose how he acts, but he is not the master of the entire story. He has a task. He has his part to play. But he does not know the full outcome to which that part will lead. So when Frodo tells Gandalf that he is late, Gandalf does not need to prove that he knows the future. He simply sees that moment from a different perspective. To Frodo, time is measured by when Gandalf should have arrived. To Gandalf, the important moment may be when he needs to be there to do what he is meant to do. And that is why, for me, the line: “A wizard is never late. Nor is he early.” is no longer merely a joke. It can be understood as a glimpse into the way Gandalf sees his place within a story greater than himself. He does not know the whole future. He does not control the entire course of the world. He simply knows that he is serving something greater, and that he must do his part when the time comes. Perhaps that is why, in the very same moment, Frodo sees a Gandalf who is late. While Gandalf sees himself as arriving precisely on time.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

16,120 次观看 • 1 个月前

FORTNITE GENO - ULTIMATE REALITY FULL INFO:🟥 Part 2 releases in a month right for Halloween💀oh i wonder why... These are the best lore Quests ever 🔰Geno begins watching all loopers, trying to find the strongest of all. You prove him worthy by him watching you survive. 🔰After choosing Geno sneaks into your mind Stellan ch4 style, reading your thoughts and talking to you in your own brain... 🔰He first uses you to watch and learn what Jones, Slone & The Order think of him. Very Curious about their opinions on himself. 🟪THE ORDER: Geno watches as his own daughter calls him Worst man she has ever known. Mad at Geno for loss of Imagined. Determined to stop him at all cost. 🟪JONES: He brings up how much history he has with Geno, only brings up how Geno is probably the most evil guy in all reality. As Geno watches him say it 🟪THE INNOVATION: Dr Slone is the least harsh against Geno, only brings up how she does not agree with the "Perfection" idea at all, only protecting realities. 🔰Geno is very disappointed at all 3, giving us these blue balls that share memories of his own past with us, 3 focused on memories of each character we talked to 🟪THE ORDER: Seeing memories of how he engineered the Sisters since birth to become the most powerful woman in all of existance to serve Geno's mission. They were meant to embody perfection and police its standards, basically forcefully make people be perfect. Geno takes responsibility that The Sisters left ULTIMATE REALITY. Because of his love for them, not being harsh enough and instead freeing them from himself. Leading to the sisters falling for "The Seven Propaganda" and fighting against what they are instead. That is why the sisters are called IMAGINED AND ORDER, they represent Geno's dream. But the icons of Perfection not being there means Geno needs a replacement for The Sisters... a new Lieutenant. Someone to take the role Sisters were meant to have and police Perfect Reality Since Hush is said to be Lieutenant of Geno, she might have been chosen as the perfect looper who joined his side? Replacing the Sisters This exact thing is also why Geno was watching loopers trying to find the best one, to replace his daughters since Order dissapointed him. 🟪DR SLONE - INNOVATION: Geno brings up how Slone was basically his right hand, together building something incredible, A PERFECT WORLD captured in a PERFECT LOOP Confirming finally why The Imagined Order invented the loop. To not only train loopers make people become perfect But also to fuse loop and reality into one, so Paradise and a perfect world keeps looping never ending, no one inside of it ever dying too. That is why this season is so digital and glitching, reality and loop are fusing The reason why Geno wants an ULTIMATE REALITY is confirmed to be because of all the pain, all the fights, and agonizing chaos of reality. He wants it all to end. The fights everything. Only paradise and fun The only way to reach this is end Omniverse form 1 reality only, only perfect people are allowed inside of it, him always watching and controlling everyone He wants chaos to end forever. Geno admits he abused Slone's stubbornness to make her always do exactly what he wanted, which is why Slone will now be more of a liability on us... EHM last season moment Dr Slone wants Omniverse to keep existing unlike Geno, she likes the chaos that he hates. So its our time, what do we want. Chaos or Eternal peace? A peace that comes with great cost 🟪JONES: Geno feels awful for Jones.. Geno says how Jones is fated to fade away in a lonely part of a random reality, nameless unimportant, a loser. Geno for fun took this as a challenge on himself, wanting to see if he can turn someone he sees as so useless, make him become something, a hero That is why he sent IO to take Jones in as an agent, why he made choices causing Jones to betray IO, like taking his access away etc. Geno basically admits he put Jones in this path of becoming a hero, he was behind what Jones has become... But saying Jones was never a hero, he is not made out of hero stuff... "I set him up to fail" Telling us havent u seen Jones fail over and over again?? SO I WAS RIGHT😭all this time manipulating The Seven etc... Geno was trying to make us hate The Seven and Jones, see them as untrustworthy who keep losing Keep failing and having us in chaos and mess... Even The Sevens failures, everything was carefully planned to manipulate US THE LOOPERS... Holy mastermind Geno calls Jones flawed, but says we are perfect... we are different. This also shows how Jones becomes The Legend, the very person Geno saw as useless and weak will become the very flaw in his entire plan. 🔰Geno shows off his devices to us specially override consoles. Explaining how these devices when we activated them not only they fuse the loop and reality into one even more But also they extract matter out of the island, feeding it into THE EYE. as that device manipulates the matter of this reality and turns them into PERFECT ATOMS those atoms then forming the cloud on top of the device, very atmos which will create his Ultimate Reality. So the plan is to consume all Omniverse make it perfect turn it into 1 world only. This plan soon will effect other realities too not just this one. Once World of Perfect Order is ready, all the worthy will come with us into it. Which is why an Eye as a device. It watches to pick who is worthy. Everyone else dies 🔰Geno sends us to kill weaker loopers collecting their magic essence. He will use these to charge up a special new version of his Override devices HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 🔰Geno gives us one final challenge if we want to prove ourselves to him... To become his lieutenant. 🔰After watching The Order call him the worst man ever, most evil, stop him no matter what. He depressingly forces himself to say there is no other option, time for The Order to DIE... Even if he loves The Order, getting to spend time with her again. He is forcing himself to give up on everything, for the sake of Ending chaos, sake of perfection. 🔰We betray Geno not being willing to back stab Order. And Geno gives us a lesson for going against his words, showing us how powerless we trully are agains him He kills u in 1 second🥲lets us try once again just to show us how if we are against him, no matter what we do it will be useless. 🔰Geno still hopes u will change your mind, teasing you with a hack "YourThoughtsAreMine" Showing how he is in your mind, reading what you even think of. And he begins here and there talking to you, manipulating you to join his side before Judgment Day THIS IS THE BEST FORTNITE LORE EVER MAN???
6:35

FORTNITE GENO - ULTIMATE REALITY FULL INFO:🟥 Part 2 releases in a month right for Halloween💀oh i wonder why... These are the best lore Quests ever 🔰Geno begins watching all loopers, trying to find the strongest of all. You prove him worthy by him watching you survive. 🔰After choosing Geno sneaks into your mind Stellan ch4 style, reading your thoughts and talking to you in your own brain... 🔰He first uses you to watch and learn what Jones, Slone & The Order think of him. Very Curious about their opinions on himself. 🟪THE ORDER: Geno watches as his own daughter calls him Worst man she has ever known. Mad at Geno for loss of Imagined. Determined to stop him at all cost. 🟪JONES: He brings up how much history he has with Geno, only brings up how Geno is probably the most evil guy in all reality. As Geno watches him say it 🟪THE INNOVATION: Dr Slone is the least harsh against Geno, only brings up how she does not agree with the "Perfection" idea at all, only protecting realities. 🔰Geno is very disappointed at all 3, giving us these blue balls that share memories of his own past with us, 3 focused on memories of each character we talked to 🟪THE ORDER: Seeing memories of how he engineered the Sisters since birth to become the most powerful woman in all of existance to serve Geno's mission. They were meant to embody perfection and police its standards, basically forcefully make people be perfect. Geno takes responsibility that The Sisters left ULTIMATE REALITY. Because of his love for them, not being harsh enough and instead freeing them from himself. Leading to the sisters falling for "The Seven Propaganda" and fighting against what they are instead. That is why the sisters are called IMAGINED AND ORDER, they represent Geno's dream. But the icons of Perfection not being there means Geno needs a replacement for The Sisters... a new Lieutenant. Someone to take the role Sisters were meant to have and police Perfect Reality Since Hush is said to be Lieutenant of Geno, she might have been chosen as the perfect looper who joined his side? Replacing the Sisters This exact thing is also why Geno was watching loopers trying to find the best one, to replace his daughters since Order dissapointed him. 🟪DR SLONE - INNOVATION: Geno brings up how Slone was basically his right hand, together building something incredible, A PERFECT WORLD captured in a PERFECT LOOP Confirming finally why The Imagined Order invented the loop. To not only train loopers make people become perfect But also to fuse loop and reality into one, so Paradise and a perfect world keeps looping never ending, no one inside of it ever dying too. That is why this season is so digital and glitching, reality and loop are fusing The reason why Geno wants an ULTIMATE REALITY is confirmed to be because of all the pain, all the fights, and agonizing chaos of reality. He wants it all to end. The fights everything. Only paradise and fun The only way to reach this is end Omniverse form 1 reality only, only perfect people are allowed inside of it, him always watching and controlling everyone He wants chaos to end forever. Geno admits he abused Slone's stubbornness to make her always do exactly what he wanted, which is why Slone will now be more of a liability on us... EHM last season moment Dr Slone wants Omniverse to keep existing unlike Geno, she likes the chaos that he hates. So its our time, what do we want. Chaos or Eternal peace? A peace that comes with great cost 🟪JONES: Geno feels awful for Jones.. Geno says how Jones is fated to fade away in a lonely part of a random reality, nameless unimportant, a loser. Geno for fun took this as a challenge on himself, wanting to see if he can turn someone he sees as so useless, make him become something, a hero That is why he sent IO to take Jones in as an agent, why he made choices causing Jones to betray IO, like taking his access away etc. Geno basically admits he put Jones in this path of becoming a hero, he was behind what Jones has become... But saying Jones was never a hero, he is not made out of hero stuff... "I set him up to fail" Telling us havent u seen Jones fail over and over again?? SO I WAS RIGHT😭all this time manipulating The Seven etc... Geno was trying to make us hate The Seven and Jones, see them as untrustworthy who keep losing Keep failing and having us in chaos and mess... Even The Sevens failures, everything was carefully planned to manipulate US THE LOOPERS... Holy mastermind Geno calls Jones flawed, but says we are perfect... we are different. This also shows how Jones becomes The Legend, the very person Geno saw as useless and weak will become the very flaw in his entire plan. 🔰Geno shows off his devices to us specially override consoles. Explaining how these devices when we activated them not only they fuse the loop and reality into one even more But also they extract matter out of the island, feeding it into THE EYE. as that device manipulates the matter of this reality and turns them into PERFECT ATOMS those atoms then forming the cloud on top of the device, very atmos which will create his Ultimate Reality. So the plan is to consume all Omniverse make it perfect turn it into 1 world only. This plan soon will effect other realities too not just this one. Once World of Perfect Order is ready, all the worthy will come with us into it. Which is why an Eye as a device. It watches to pick who is worthy. Everyone else dies 🔰Geno sends us to kill weaker loopers collecting their magic essence. He will use these to charge up a special new version of his Override devices HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 🔰Geno gives us one final challenge if we want to prove ourselves to him... To become his lieutenant. 🔰After watching The Order call him the worst man ever, most evil, stop him no matter what. He depressingly forces himself to say there is no other option, time for The Order to DIE... Even if he loves The Order, getting to spend time with her again. He is forcing himself to give up on everything, for the sake of Ending chaos, sake of perfection. 🔰We betray Geno not being willing to back stab Order. And Geno gives us a lesson for going against his words, showing us how powerless we trully are agains him He kills u in 1 second🥲lets us try once again just to show us how if we are against him, no matter what we do it will be useless. 🔰Geno still hopes u will change your mind, teasing you with a hack "YourThoughtsAreMine" Showing how he is in your mind, reading what you even think of. And he begins here and there talking to you, manipulating you to join his side before Judgment Day THIS IS THE BEST FORTNITE LORE EVER MAN???

Scyan

38,571 次观看 • 28 天前

Strike: Wike Approves Over N12bn January Salaries of FCTA Workers, Dismisses Blackmail The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has revealed that he has just signed January salaries of the FCT Administration workers amounting to over N12bn immediately after the Court ruling, suspending the strike embarked on by the workers. The Minister stated this while addressing journalists in his office after the court ruling. Wike insisted that the government has largely met workers’ legitimate demands despite the ongoing strike. He added that the strike had been hijacked by political interests, forcing the administration to seek legal intervention to prevent a breakdown of order. “I just signed January salaries amounting to over ₦12 billion,” the minister said. “Yet the FCT is entitled to only one per cent of federal revenue. If the Federal Government earns ₦1 trillion, the FCT gets about ₦10 billion. That allocation alone cannot even cover salaries, not to talk of running the administration.” He explained that the government initially chose dialogue and engagement when the strike began, noting that it did not rush to court. “When the strike started, we believed in dialogue. We felt the issues could be resolved through discussion. But when it became clear that politicians have hijacked the strike, we had no choice but to go to court and allow the law to decide,” Wike stated. The minister acknowledged workers’ rights in a democracy but insisted that strike action should always be a last resort. “This is a democracy. Everyone has the right to protest. But if workers made 14 demands and government addressed like 10, there should be room for understanding and patience,” he said. Drawing from his experience as a former governor and local government chairman, Wike said he understood labour struggles but warned against unrealistic demands. “When demands are legitimate, government should acknowledge them. But it is not always possible to implement everything at once. Government does not deny legitimate entitlements, especially wages,” he added. Wike also dismissed claims that he was chased out of office during the strike, describing such reports as false and politically motivated. “I was in my office, went to the airport to see Mr President, travelled to Turkey, and returned. These stories are deliberate misinformation,” he said. On revenue challenges, the minister disclosed that the administration has significantly improved Internally Generated Revenue (IGR), increasing it from about ₦9 billion when he assumed office to ₦30 billion. “When we take steps to improve IGR, people complain. But that progress is what sustains salaries, reforms, and development,” he said. He highlighted key reforms under the current administration, including the creation of the FCT Civil Service Commission, appointment of permanent secretaries, and establishment of the Office of the Head of Service. “Before now, workers retired at director level, but they can now rise to Permanent Secretary. This was made possible by the Government of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. "You cannot expect government to spend all available revenue on wages alone while neglecting massive infrastructure development,” Wike noted. Following the court order suspending the strike, the minister issued a stern warning to workers. “Disobeying the law has consequences. From tomorrow, any worker who refuses to resume work will face disciplinary action. Anyone who attempts to block government facilities will face the full weight of the law,” he said. Wike rejected claims that dialogue had broken down, insisting that engagement with unions has always been ongoing with his approval. “No amount of blackmail or political games will intimidate this administration. We will obey the court, and everyone else must do the same,” he declared.
1:44

Strike: Wike Approves Over N12bn January Salaries of FCTA Workers, Dismisses Blackmail The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has revealed that he has just signed January salaries of the FCT Administration workers amounting to over N12bn immediately after the Court ruling, suspending the strike embarked on by the workers. The Minister stated this while addressing journalists in his office after the court ruling. Wike insisted that the government has largely met workers’ legitimate demands despite the ongoing strike. He added that the strike had been hijacked by political interests, forcing the administration to seek legal intervention to prevent a breakdown of order. “I just signed January salaries amounting to over ₦12 billion,” the minister said. “Yet the FCT is entitled to only one per cent of federal revenue. If the Federal Government earns ₦1 trillion, the FCT gets about ₦10 billion. That allocation alone cannot even cover salaries, not to talk of running the administration.” He explained that the government initially chose dialogue and engagement when the strike began, noting that it did not rush to court. “When the strike started, we believed in dialogue. We felt the issues could be resolved through discussion. But when it became clear that politicians have hijacked the strike, we had no choice but to go to court and allow the law to decide,” Wike stated. The minister acknowledged workers’ rights in a democracy but insisted that strike action should always be a last resort. “This is a democracy. Everyone has the right to protest. But if workers made 14 demands and government addressed like 10, there should be room for understanding and patience,” he said. Drawing from his experience as a former governor and local government chairman, Wike said he understood labour struggles but warned against unrealistic demands. “When demands are legitimate, government should acknowledge them. But it is not always possible to implement everything at once. Government does not deny legitimate entitlements, especially wages,” he added. Wike also dismissed claims that he was chased out of office during the strike, describing such reports as false and politically motivated. “I was in my office, went to the airport to see Mr President, travelled to Turkey, and returned. These stories are deliberate misinformation,” he said. On revenue challenges, the minister disclosed that the administration has significantly improved Internally Generated Revenue (IGR), increasing it from about ₦9 billion when he assumed office to ₦30 billion. “When we take steps to improve IGR, people complain. But that progress is what sustains salaries, reforms, and development,” he said. He highlighted key reforms under the current administration, including the creation of the FCT Civil Service Commission, appointment of permanent secretaries, and establishment of the Office of the Head of Service. “Before now, workers retired at director level, but they can now rise to Permanent Secretary. This was made possible by the Government of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. "You cannot expect government to spend all available revenue on wages alone while neglecting massive infrastructure development,” Wike noted. Following the court order suspending the strike, the minister issued a stern warning to workers. “Disobeying the law has consequences. From tomorrow, any worker who refuses to resume work will face disciplinary action. Anyone who attempts to block government facilities will face the full weight of the law,” he said. Wike rejected claims that dialogue had broken down, insisting that engagement with unions has always been ongoing with his approval. “No amount of blackmail or political games will intimidate this administration. We will obey the court, and everyone else must do the same,” he declared.

Lere Olayinka - Aresa 1

11,368 次观看 • 8 个月前

BREAKING: ValhallaVFTchannel exposes Candace Owens' Fort Huachuca witness Mitch Snow. Domestic violence, child kidnapping, stolen valor, rape accusations, perjury, fraudulent police reports, & repeated assault of women. Candace Owens & her fans raised $141k on GiveSendGo for him. "He lied about his cartel backstory. We know this because he stayed in the military for another six years, proven through his military records." "His first wife said, 'I have no idea what you are talking about. We were never on the run from any cartels.'" "He lied about the reason why he was removed from the military. He lied about what he did in Special Forces." "He lied about falling 80ft and hurting his back during deployment. He actally injured his back in a non-deployment, non-service-related event while he was drinking." "He told Candace he had to change his name in the 1990s because he was running from the cartels. That's another lie. He changed his name in 2010 to Mitch Snow to hide his domestic violence charges." “He hit me for the first time when my son was two weeks old… I picked up my son and tried to go upstairs. He stopped me. He grabbed my son out of my arms, and he slapped me across the face. Then he told me that he had to do it because I was hysterical.” "He used his current wife, Lanae, to try to get custody over his children from his previous wife, Gretchen, who he had also abused. This is a pattern. He does this over and over again with each of the victims." "He spit in my face... He pushed me into the wall face first. I crawled into my room. He threw me again..." "He admitted to punching women in the face in his own words in this text message." "This is the habeus corpus that forced him to return the kidnapped child, who he had kidnapped for three months... Here's proof he was arrested for threatening to kill the judge and two women who forced him to return the kidnapped child." “He’s got a history of making up lies which have been proven false by law enforcement, prosecutors, judges… Mitch made up the story that his wife Lanae abused him and threw acid in his face… and that she sexually abused their son… then later admitted he hadn’t actually observed that, but he had made those claims… the investigator threw it out.” “Where are his receipts for the meeting? Again, guys, he has no proof of anything. Everything in this guy’s story hinges on ‘trust me, bro.’” “Retired Staff Sergeant Mitch Snow—this is his own profile, his own bio… he’s not a retired Staff Sergeant. Records show he was discharged. He also claims he’s a United States Army Special Forces medic—he was not… these are all lies. So why would we believe his eyewitness account?” “This is from the judge… the court is concerned Mr. Snow’s actions violate the stalking provision of the protection order… Mr. Snow has not met the burden to show there has been a substantial change in circumstances that he will not resume acts of domestic violence… the court grants the motion for renewal.” “If you had four or five different people who had Domestic Violence Protection orders against you—who do you think the problem is?" ----- Candace Owens recieved an email tip from Snow and relied on his uncorroborated testimony to claim that Erika Kirk, Brian Harpole, Rep. Mark Amodei, and members of the U.S. military planned Charlie Kirk’s assassination at a supposed top-secret meeting at Fort Huachuca—a meeting Snow claims he “accidentally” walked into. Owens and Snow have produced zero verifiable evidence that the meeting occurred or that any of these people were present. Harpole and Amodei have provided documented alibis: Amodei was on video voting in Congress, and Harpole was on a flight in Dallas. Nevertheless, Owens and her supporters continue to double down, repeatedly insinuating that Erika Kirk, Harpole, TPUSA, and the U.S. military were involved in Charlie Kirk’s murder. In Episode 277, she claimed TPUSA sent Charlie to Asia so he would not witness the alleged Fort Huachuca meeting and said she “cannot see how this would lead to anything other than a full confession from the government about the military’s involvement in Charlie’s assassination.” Candace and her supporters demand critics “debunk the story,” yet no evidence has ever been produced, and when alibis are presented, they are dismissed. The entire narrative rests on the word of one deeply discredited witness with a long, documented history of lying to police, courts, and judges; multiple domestic violence restraining orders; rape allegations; fabricated military service claims; kidnapping; perjury; fraud; and repeated assault and abuse of women—while Candace Owens and her audience raised $141,000 for him after he appeared on her podcast to tell this story, which she and her supporters now use to push the claim that Charlie Kirk was murdered by his own wife, colleagues, head of security, and the U.S. military. Please watch and share ValhallaVFTchannel's full livestream below.
41:18

BREAKING: ValhallaVFTchannel exposes Candace Owens' Fort Huachuca witness Mitch Snow. Domestic violence, child kidnapping, stolen valor, rape accusations, perjury, fraudulent police reports, & repeated assault of women. Candace Owens & her fans raised $141k on GiveSendGo for him. "He lied about his cartel backstory. We know this because he stayed in the military for another six years, proven through his military records." "His first wife said, 'I have no idea what you are talking about. We were never on the run from any cartels.'" "He lied about the reason why he was removed from the military. He lied about what he did in Special Forces." "He lied about falling 80ft and hurting his back during deployment. He actally injured his back in a non-deployment, non-service-related event while he was drinking." "He told Candace he had to change his name in the 1990s because he was running from the cartels. That's another lie. He changed his name in 2010 to Mitch Snow to hide his domestic violence charges." “He hit me for the first time when my son was two weeks old… I picked up my son and tried to go upstairs. He stopped me. He grabbed my son out of my arms, and he slapped me across the face. Then he told me that he had to do it because I was hysterical.” "He used his current wife, Lanae, to try to get custody over his children from his previous wife, Gretchen, who he had also abused. This is a pattern. He does this over and over again with each of the victims." "He spit in my face... He pushed me into the wall face first. I crawled into my room. He threw me again..." "He admitted to punching women in the face in his own words in this text message." "This is the habeus corpus that forced him to return the kidnapped child, who he had kidnapped for three months... Here's proof he was arrested for threatening to kill the judge and two women who forced him to return the kidnapped child." “He’s got a history of making up lies which have been proven false by law enforcement, prosecutors, judges… Mitch made up the story that his wife Lanae abused him and threw acid in his face… and that she sexually abused their son… then later admitted he hadn’t actually observed that, but he had made those claims… the investigator threw it out.” “Where are his receipts for the meeting? Again, guys, he has no proof of anything. Everything in this guy’s story hinges on ‘trust me, bro.’” “Retired Staff Sergeant Mitch Snow—this is his own profile, his own bio… he’s not a retired Staff Sergeant. Records show he was discharged. He also claims he’s a United States Army Special Forces medic—he was not… these are all lies. So why would we believe his eyewitness account?” “This is from the judge… the court is concerned Mr. Snow’s actions violate the stalking provision of the protection order… Mr. Snow has not met the burden to show there has been a substantial change in circumstances that he will not resume acts of domestic violence… the court grants the motion for renewal.” “If you had four or five different people who had Domestic Violence Protection orders against you—who do you think the problem is?" ----- Candace Owens recieved an email tip from Snow and relied on his uncorroborated testimony to claim that Erika Kirk, Brian Harpole, Rep. Mark Amodei, and members of the U.S. military planned Charlie Kirk’s assassination at a supposed top-secret meeting at Fort Huachuca—a meeting Snow claims he “accidentally” walked into. Owens and Snow have produced zero verifiable evidence that the meeting occurred or that any of these people were present. Harpole and Amodei have provided documented alibis: Amodei was on video voting in Congress, and Harpole was on a flight in Dallas. Nevertheless, Owens and her supporters continue to double down, repeatedly insinuating that Erika Kirk, Harpole, TPUSA, and the U.S. military were involved in Charlie Kirk’s murder. In Episode 277, she claimed TPUSA sent Charlie to Asia so he would not witness the alleged Fort Huachuca meeting and said she “cannot see how this would lead to anything other than a full confession from the government about the military’s involvement in Charlie’s assassination.” Candace and her supporters demand critics “debunk the story,” yet no evidence has ever been produced, and when alibis are presented, they are dismissed. The entire narrative rests on the word of one deeply discredited witness with a long, documented history of lying to police, courts, and judges; multiple domestic violence restraining orders; rape allegations; fabricated military service claims; kidnapping; perjury; fraud; and repeated assault and abuse of women—while Candace Owens and her audience raised $141,000 for him after he appeared on her podcast to tell this story, which she and her supporters now use to push the claim that Charlie Kirk was murdered by his own wife, colleagues, head of security, and the U.S. military. Please watch and share ValhallaVFTchannel's full livestream below.

KanekoaTheGreat

107,180 次观看 • 9 个月前

🤬 Burlison: Putting Lacatski Under Oath in a Hearing Wasn't a Top Priority Because He Wouldn't Say Anything New 🤬 (I can't believe I just heard that.) Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Dr. James Lacatski came on our show. He ran the UFO program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he admitted on our show that they breached the hull of a UFO in government possession." Burlison at the Last Hearing: "You reported [that] James Lacatski came to you with government possession of NHI craft and how they ultimately gained entry. Can you testify to the veracity of that claim?" George Knapp at the Last Hearing: "Dr. Lacatski is an honorable man who served most of his career with the DIA. A very trusted, high-level rocket scientist and intelligence analyst who inspired the AAWSAP program, as I said earlier. He said this craft, we had managed to get inside of it. It had no wings, no rotor, no tail, it had no fuel, no fuel tanks. They didn't know how it flew or how it was operated. It clearly looked like it was aerodynamic, but he would not go further. He's a by-the-book guy, and until he gets clearance to say more about that, I don't think we're going to hear much more. "But, it's not ours. It wasn't ours. We didn't make it. We didn't know who made it and how it was built and how it operated. We've got at least one, and I don't know, I think that's enough confirmation that we do have recovered discs and material." (What is written in "Initial Revelations" about that alleged craft, and Lacatski standing by what was written when he was on "Weaponized" is one of the most important claims we've ever had in this field. I don't see it as confirmation that we have craft but we're getting closer. Lacatski saying that he saw it with his own eyes would take it up a notch, but I still wanna see it for myself, and not just in photos and videos. AI is just too good to accept that as proof.) Corbell: "So, and you put that in congressional record. Do you have a way that you can, you know, find out, where is it? He can't tell us, but maybe he can tell you? Where is that craft? Can you go hunt it down? Can you go see it?" Burlison: "You know, that's an interesting question. When it came to Lacatski - and I watched his interview that he did with you guys - and here's what my response to him is. Because he was frustrated that we hadn't reached out to him, but he also kind of, he also admitted that - which is what I was told, and the reason why we haven't reached out to him - is that he's not gonna tell us anything that's not in his books." (Most people on this planet have not read his books!) Corbell: "Well, hold on, hold on. You did reach out to him. There have been three hearings. I reached out to him on behalf of Congress, officially, twice, to say..." Burlison: "You did, that's right, you did." Corbell: "And I had congressional members talk with him the hearing before the last one. He just forgot. But the point is, is that maybe with you guys, in the correct environment, with the right clearances, he can tell you where it is, and you can just put this to bed and go find it." (I'm not against Congress talking to Lacatski in a SCIF, but, IMO, the chances that he tells members of the Secrets Task Force the location of this alleged craft are ZERO. Maybe Rubio would get an answer but he may already know. And if he (Rubio) does know, he's not telling us. At least not yet, and probably, IMO, never.) Burlison: "Yeah. And I remember that. I remember that he was one of the people that we had tasked you to go to reach out to. And for those people that are kind of asking how did that relationship work? Look, we don't have all the contact information for all these people. Why repeat the work that you two have done in building these contacts in your networks? And so, you, basically, patriotically dedicated your time, for free, helping us make contact and kind of coordinate some of those witnesses. (That was an awesome thing for Corbell and Knapp to do and it was for a great cause. The truth!) Burlison: "And I had been told Lacatski is probably not gonna reveal anything that he hasn't already revealed. When I've talked to people, it seemed like it wasn't gonna be new information. And therefore, to me, he wasn't as high of a priority." (He should have been THE priority, as far as witnesses for the hearing. With Lacatski, you have a respected rocket scientist, physicist and intelligence analyst, who has confirmed that this passage from Initial Revelations is accurate: “At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this book’s authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate”? And, Lacatski may have seen the craft with his own eyes and entered it. But Burlison (or anybody else on the Task Force) didn't see it as a priority to bring him in, UNDER OATH, and have him repeat what is said in that book, and other important claims from the other two books, and his interviews with Knapp and Corbell? I'm shaking my head as I type this. You know what percentage of the world has read those books and/or watched the, limited, interviews Lacatski has given? Maybe 0.0000000000001% of the population? You had (and still do) a chance to get that man under oath and it wasn't a priority? WTAF? He's getting older and we don't know how much longer he will be around. If, as Rep. Andy Ogles told Matt Laslo, another hearing is coming in January, Lacatski, if he agrees, MUST be part of that. You can ask him about the craft, the alleged paranormal connection, and people getting sick and injured if they get too close to a UAP. And, he can be asked about the hitchhiker effect and claims of contagion. It doesn't matter if he won't add anything new or different than what's in his books or interviews. Put him under oath for the world to see and hear and, hopefully, the mainstream media picks up the story: Rocket Scientist: The USG Has an Otherworldly Craft in its Possession and Have Breached the Hull And maybe, if he's in a Disclosure mood, he'll offer up some surprise like he did in his last interview on Weaponized when he said we have made progress on back engineering these craft but, "it hasn't been achieved to its full extent." That's a MASSIVE claim! Push him to offer up more. And if his answers to many questions are: "It's all in my book"? Make him read from his book so the world can be informed about his claims and what was allegedly discovered in AAWSAP. David Grusch didn't say much more than what he said in his interview with Ross Coulthart and article in The Debrief, but was there ever any thought that he shouldn't have been put under oath and brought in as a witness for that congressional hearing? Of course not!) Burlison: "But to your point, I think getting him in a SCIF and seeing if there's maybe any additional room for him to talk, it might be worthwhile to do that." Knapp: "I think he might. I mean, the last conversations that we've had, it seems like he's edging closer to the idea that, under the right circumstances, he would be willing to share information with Congress, which would be great." (Again, I'm all for putting him the SCIF, too.)
3:29

🤬 Burlison: Putting Lacatski Under Oath in a Hearing Wasn't a Top Priority Because He Wouldn't Say Anything New 🤬 (I can't believe I just heard that.) Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Dr. James Lacatski came on our show. He ran the UFO program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he admitted on our show that they breached the hull of a UFO in government possession." Burlison at the Last Hearing: "You reported [that] James Lacatski came to you with government possession of NHI craft and how they ultimately gained entry. Can you testify to the veracity of that claim?" George Knapp at the Last Hearing: "Dr. Lacatski is an honorable man who served most of his career with the DIA. A very trusted, high-level rocket scientist and intelligence analyst who inspired the AAWSAP program, as I said earlier. He said this craft, we had managed to get inside of it. It had no wings, no rotor, no tail, it had no fuel, no fuel tanks. They didn't know how it flew or how it was operated. It clearly looked like it was aerodynamic, but he would not go further. He's a by-the-book guy, and until he gets clearance to say more about that, I don't think we're going to hear much more. "But, it's not ours. It wasn't ours. We didn't make it. We didn't know who made it and how it was built and how it operated. We've got at least one, and I don't know, I think that's enough confirmation that we do have recovered discs and material." (What is written in "Initial Revelations" about that alleged craft, and Lacatski standing by what was written when he was on "Weaponized" is one of the most important claims we've ever had in this field. I don't see it as confirmation that we have craft but we're getting closer. Lacatski saying that he saw it with his own eyes would take it up a notch, but I still wanna see it for myself, and not just in photos and videos. AI is just too good to accept that as proof.) Corbell: "So, and you put that in congressional record. Do you have a way that you can, you know, find out, where is it? He can't tell us, but maybe he can tell you? Where is that craft? Can you go hunt it down? Can you go see it?" Burlison: "You know, that's an interesting question. When it came to Lacatski - and I watched his interview that he did with you guys - and here's what my response to him is. Because he was frustrated that we hadn't reached out to him, but he also kind of, he also admitted that - which is what I was told, and the reason why we haven't reached out to him - is that he's not gonna tell us anything that's not in his books." (Most people on this planet have not read his books!) Corbell: "Well, hold on, hold on. You did reach out to him. There have been three hearings. I reached out to him on behalf of Congress, officially, twice, to say..." Burlison: "You did, that's right, you did." Corbell: "And I had congressional members talk with him the hearing before the last one. He just forgot. But the point is, is that maybe with you guys, in the correct environment, with the right clearances, he can tell you where it is, and you can just put this to bed and go find it." (I'm not against Congress talking to Lacatski in a SCIF, but, IMO, the chances that he tells members of the Secrets Task Force the location of this alleged craft are ZERO. Maybe Rubio would get an answer but he may already know. And if he (Rubio) does know, he's not telling us. At least not yet, and probably, IMO, never.) Burlison: "Yeah. And I remember that. I remember that he was one of the people that we had tasked you to go to reach out to. And for those people that are kind of asking how did that relationship work? Look, we don't have all the contact information for all these people. Why repeat the work that you two have done in building these contacts in your networks? And so, you, basically, patriotically dedicated your time, for free, helping us make contact and kind of coordinate some of those witnesses. (That was an awesome thing for Corbell and Knapp to do and it was for a great cause. The truth!) Burlison: "And I had been told Lacatski is probably not gonna reveal anything that he hasn't already revealed. When I've talked to people, it seemed like it wasn't gonna be new information. And therefore, to me, he wasn't as high of a priority." (He should have been THE priority, as far as witnesses for the hearing. With Lacatski, you have a respected rocket scientist, physicist and intelligence analyst, who has confirmed that this passage from Initial Revelations is accurate: “At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this book’s authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate”? And, Lacatski may have seen the craft with his own eyes and entered it. But Burlison (or anybody else on the Task Force) didn't see it as a priority to bring him in, UNDER OATH, and have him repeat what is said in that book, and other important claims from the other two books, and his interviews with Knapp and Corbell? I'm shaking my head as I type this. You know what percentage of the world has read those books and/or watched the, limited, interviews Lacatski has given? Maybe 0.0000000000001% of the population? You had (and still do) a chance to get that man under oath and it wasn't a priority? WTAF? He's getting older and we don't know how much longer he will be around. If, as Rep. Andy Ogles told Matt Laslo, another hearing is coming in January, Lacatski, if he agrees, MUST be part of that. You can ask him about the craft, the alleged paranormal connection, and people getting sick and injured if they get too close to a UAP. And, he can be asked about the hitchhiker effect and claims of contagion. It doesn't matter if he won't add anything new or different than what's in his books or interviews. Put him under oath for the world to see and hear and, hopefully, the mainstream media picks up the story: Rocket Scientist: The USG Has an Otherworldly Craft in its Possession and Have Breached the Hull And maybe, if he's in a Disclosure mood, he'll offer up some surprise like he did in his last interview on Weaponized when he said we have made progress on back engineering these craft but, "it hasn't been achieved to its full extent." That's a MASSIVE claim! Push him to offer up more. And if his answers to many questions are: "It's all in my book"? Make him read from his book so the world can be informed about his claims and what was allegedly discovered in AAWSAP. David Grusch didn't say much more than what he said in his interview with Ross Coulthart and article in The Debrief, but was there ever any thought that he shouldn't have been put under oath and brought in as a witness for that congressional hearing? Of course not!) Burlison: "But to your point, I think getting him in a SCIF and seeing if there's maybe any additional room for him to talk, it might be worthwhile to do that." Knapp: "I think he might. I mean, the last conversations that we've had, it seems like he's edging closer to the idea that, under the right circumstances, he would be willing to share information with Congress, which would be great." (Again, I'm all for putting him the SCIF, too.)

Joe Murgia

30,311 次观看 • 9 个月前

You Might Call Me a Dumb Jew, But I Know A BUNCH of Stuff About You Pepe Le Ewwww Dan Bilzerian: The first thing to know about Danny Boy is that he’s actually a Silver Spoon Trust Fund Daddy’s Boy. ALL OF DAN’S MONEY COMES FROM A TRUST HIS FATHER SET UP FOR HIM! So who is his father? A crook who was sentenced to four years in prison for securities fraud in 1989 (serving 13 months). In other words, Dan is as moral as his father, which is to say… NOT AT ALL. Quick funny facts break: 1) He had two heart attacks by the age of 32 due to too much “viagra and cocaine.” Another way of looking at that is, Dan Bilzerian is a limp dick by his own confession. 2) He took steroids while failing to be a Navy SEAL, then threw ACTUAL SEALS under the bus by saying a third of SEALS are on steroids 3) He complains about dual citizenship and dual loyalty while a dual citizenship himself and registered in the Armenian Army in 2017 4) He’s lost roughly $150 million in his life 5) He’s the same height as Ben Shapiro (the only way they’re equal) 6) He had to pay women hundreds of thousands of dollars to look like they enjoyed his company This epic loser who answers the question, “what would a human look like if a chode gained sentience and grew a Mohawk,” was a trouble maker who may or may not have ever graduated high school (you’re shocked I know). He then enlisted in 1999 before leaving in 2003. Now, if you understand how time works, you’d wonder what his service record looks like given he was in prior to 9/11 and left two years AFTER 9/11. Most notably no overseas deployments. But why? Well, Danny Boy fashioned himself a SEAL, but failed his first attempt due to leg injuries. Nothing to scoff at there, buuuuuuuut… It was the second time he failed to become a SEAL that is most interesting. He either did one of the following three things or all three: 1) Fell asleep on watch and blamed it on others, including blaming them for not lying on his behalf to save him 2) Had a range incident 3) Had an incident of insubordination What we DO KNOW is that Danny Boy Stole Valor by claiming on multiple occasions that he completed BUD/S. Which leads us to his time on Lone Survivor, the incredible story of Marcus Luttrell, Michael Murphy and Operation RedWing. Bilzerian spent a million dollars (of his trust fund money) literally buying his way into the movie and demanding he get a certain allotment of screen time and lines. He was such an insubordinate menace the film directors (thank G-d) limited his time on screen as much as possible. (Unfortunately, you can still see the hedgehog with alopecia if you know where to look). Literally the only way Dan Bilzerian could get honored for his service is as to pay for it, and even then he sucked so much he didn’t. And now we have to talk about Route 91/The Las Vegas Shooting Massacre. Roid Monster McGee tried to get a police officer on the scene to give him a gun. The officer did not oblige, and instead of helping or assisting others, Bougie Bilge decided to film himself. His actions were so deplorable Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer said: This is what kills me about people like you. Always playing 'operator dress up' and so so tough when the cameras are on. A woman just got shot in the head and you are running away filming; that's not what operators do. Finally, going back to the fraud family that is the Bilzerians: The only reason that Bilzerian isn’t under investigation right now for fraud is because his company Ignite was actually his father’s, who is now being investigated for frauding the U.S. i.e., Danny Boy was so incompetent as a CEO it was a fake listing so his father could (allegedly) commit more crime. None of this even goes into his abusing women, getting kicked out of nightclubs, nor his antisemitism and love of anti-American forces. So who is Danny Boy Bilzerian? A lying loser. Nothing more. Shabbat Shalom!!!
10:12

You Might Call Me a Dumb Jew, But I Know A BUNCH of Stuff About You Pepe Le Ewwww Dan Bilzerian: The first thing to know about Danny Boy is that he’s actually a Silver Spoon Trust Fund Daddy’s Boy. ALL OF DAN’S MONEY COMES FROM A TRUST HIS FATHER SET UP FOR HIM! So who is his father? A crook who was sentenced to four years in prison for securities fraud in 1989 (serving 13 months). In other words, Dan is as moral as his father, which is to say… NOT AT ALL. Quick funny facts break: 1) He had two heart attacks by the age of 32 due to too much “viagra and cocaine.” Another way of looking at that is, Dan Bilzerian is a limp dick by his own confession. 2) He took steroids while failing to be a Navy SEAL, then threw ACTUAL SEALS under the bus by saying a third of SEALS are on steroids 3) He complains about dual citizenship and dual loyalty while a dual citizenship himself and registered in the Armenian Army in 2017 4) He’s lost roughly $150 million in his life 5) He’s the same height as Ben Shapiro (the only way they’re equal) 6) He had to pay women hundreds of thousands of dollars to look like they enjoyed his company This epic loser who answers the question, “what would a human look like if a chode gained sentience and grew a Mohawk,” was a trouble maker who may or may not have ever graduated high school (you’re shocked I know). He then enlisted in 1999 before leaving in 2003. Now, if you understand how time works, you’d wonder what his service record looks like given he was in prior to 9/11 and left two years AFTER 9/11. Most notably no overseas deployments. But why? Well, Danny Boy fashioned himself a SEAL, but failed his first attempt due to leg injuries. Nothing to scoff at there, buuuuuuuut… It was the second time he failed to become a SEAL that is most interesting. He either did one of the following three things or all three: 1) Fell asleep on watch and blamed it on others, including blaming them for not lying on his behalf to save him 2) Had a range incident 3) Had an incident of insubordination What we DO KNOW is that Danny Boy Stole Valor by claiming on multiple occasions that he completed BUD/S. Which leads us to his time on Lone Survivor, the incredible story of Marcus Luttrell, Michael Murphy and Operation RedWing. Bilzerian spent a million dollars (of his trust fund money) literally buying his way into the movie and demanding he get a certain allotment of screen time and lines. He was such an insubordinate menace the film directors (thank G-d) limited his time on screen as much as possible. (Unfortunately, you can still see the hedgehog with alopecia if you know where to look). Literally the only way Dan Bilzerian could get honored for his service is as to pay for it, and even then he sucked so much he didn’t. And now we have to talk about Route 91/The Las Vegas Shooting Massacre. Roid Monster McGee tried to get a police officer on the scene to give him a gun. The officer did not oblige, and instead of helping or assisting others, Bougie Bilge decided to film himself. His actions were so deplorable Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer said: This is what kills me about people like you. Always playing 'operator dress up' and so so tough when the cameras are on. A woman just got shot in the head and you are running away filming; that's not what operators do. Finally, going back to the fraud family that is the Bilzerians: The only reason that Bilzerian isn’t under investigation right now for fraud is because his company Ignite was actually his father’s, who is now being investigated for frauding the U.S. i.e., Danny Boy was so incompetent as a CEO it was a fake listing so his father could (allegedly) commit more crime. None of this even goes into his abusing women, getting kicked out of nightclubs, nor his antisemitism and love of anti-American forces. So who is Danny Boy Bilzerian? A lying loser. Nothing more. Shabbat Shalom!!!

Jake Donnelly

89,298 次观看 • 1 年前

I’m posting this video compilation and explanation to document contradictions and moral/ethical inconsistencies in how Kirk Cameron has handled public criticism following his promotion of annihilationism, and to publicly call him to repent - not so much for his false and dangerous beliefs about hell, but about how he has sinfully responded to disagreement and correction. This became necessary after Kirk went to CBN (a platform that has promoted Benny Hinn, Joyce Meyer, Kenneth Copeland, T.D. Jakes, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, Todd White, Bill Johnson, etc.) to whitewash the record and level accusations against his brothers yet again. This is not about tone, personality, or online drama. It is about accountability for public teaching. Before anything else, I want to be clear about what I am and am not saying. I am not accusing Kirk Cameron of being an unbeliever. I am not claiming he is outside the faith. I am not “outing” him as something other than a brother in Christ. And although I believe annihilationism is a formal theological heresy, I am not declaring Kirk himself to be a heretic. I do not know him personally. My concern is not personal animus, but repentance where error exists, and more broadly, the integrity of Christian engagement with one another online, which must be governed by Scripture even when that engagement is difficult or uncomfortable. Because Protestia was the original “heresy hunter” website that drew 3rd-party attention to Kirk's podcast, I also want to clarify something plainly. Protestia accurately characterized and quoted Kirk. We did not rebuke him. We did not accuse him of heresy. We did not editorialize on his theology. We quoted his words directly, provided clips, and linked to his full podcast. Our reporting brought the issue into the open, led to dozens, if not hundreds, of corrective sermons around the country, as well as men like Albert Mohler, Justin Peters, Ray Comfort, and Todd Friel providing lengthy, corrective responses. In response to Kirk's rebuke of "sin sniffers" and "heresy hunters," looking for people to attack so our "ministries don't dry up," it must be said that neither Protestia nor I, as its publisher, earn any profit from this work. I operate without a salary, without ad profit tied to outrage, and without financial incentive to manufacture controversy. We also publish a clear, accessible set of doctrinal and editorial standards that invite accountability. Readers are encouraged to evaluate our reporting against those standards at any time. With sadness, I report the following ongoing hypocricies, errors, and sins, call for public repentance, and call on fellow public Christian ministers who confirm the public witness of the evidence to call Kirk to repentance as well: First, Kirk repeatedly characterizes annihilationism as a secondary issue, something Christians may disagree on without serious consequence. Yet in Episode 86, he frames the potential error of teaching ECTorment as a first-tier moral offense, calling it a “severe misrepresentation of God’s character” and “a great sin and mistake.” In effect, annihilationism’s potential error is treated as second-tier, while ECT’s potential error is framed as first-tier. His critics are condemned for strong language, even though his own framing assigns a clear double standard. Second, Kirk continues to publicly accuse unnamed brothers of unspecified sins against him. He speaks of “sin sniffers,” “heresy hunters,” and brothers behaving like unbelievers, yet never names who supposedly sinned or what sin was committed. Scripture does not authorize anonymous moral indictment. Accusation without identification prevents repentance, response, or clarification. Third, Kirk makes public claims about what Scripture teaches, on a public platform, for a mass audience, while insisting that responses to those claims must occur privately. This is incoherent. Public teaching creates public responsibility. A teacher cannot embrace the delegated authority of public instruction while exempting himself from open, public evaluation. Fourth, in the CBN interview, Kirk reframes the controversy as a surprising overreaction to an off-the-cuff question from his son. The episode itself shows otherwise. Episode 86 was planned, structured, cited, and presented as a “dangerous conversation.” He named specific theological positions, referenced Edward Fudge, and declared a personal conclusion. This was not accidental commentary, and it was not unexpected that it would draw strong reaction. Fifth, Kirk gives contradictory explanations for how he formed his beliefs. In attempting to minimize the doctrinal seriousness of ECT, he says he held to it only because of tradition, then says "verses" brought him to it, and continues to insinuate that ECT proponents today rely on tradition rather than Scripture. Sixth, Kirk repeatedly accuses online critics of illegitimate financial motives, claiming their analysis and arguments were driven by clicks, outrage, or income. At the same time, he presents his own financial concerns, canceled events, and lost opportunities as legitimate considerations. Financial motive is treated as sinful when attributed to others and understandable when attributed to himself. Seventh, Kirk appealed to many ECT teachers as fellow serious scriptural scholars, yet only listed figures who had passed away and could neither reject his conclusions nor correct his use of their authority. Living theologians who object are portrayed as divisive; dead ones are cited as allies. Eighth, Kirk openly admits that he wants annihilationism to be true, calls it a “great relief,” and imagines the joy of presenting annihilationism as "good news" to unbelievers who reject a God who eternally punishes. This is not a neutral inquiry. It is not merely "asking questions." It is doctrinal modification shaped by emotional desires - precisely the method Scripture warns against. Scripture does not require private confrontation before public correction when the teaching itself was public. Matthew 18 governs private interpersonal sin, not public doctrine. When error is public, correction must be public for the sake of those who heard it. Paul rebuked Peter publicly because the error was public. Elders are commanded to refute false teaching openly. Demanding private correction for public doctrine protects the teacher while leaving the audience confused. That is not loving. It prioritizes reputation over truth and the flock over no one. Public correction is not unchristian. It is biblical. It protects those exposed to error and provides clarity rather than silence. Jesus’ parable in Luke 16 about stewardship applies here. Teachers are not owners of doctrine; they are stewards of it. The steward is condemned not for dishonesty alone, but for handling what belonged to another according to his own preferences. Doctrine is not ours to reshape according to emotional comfort or perceived evangelistic usefulness. Faithfulness, not palatability, is the measure of stewardship. The gospel cannot be separated from what Christ saves us from. Hell is not a minor doctrine, and it is not ours to soften for relief or rhetorical safety. This video is not about malice. It is about accountability, witness, and loving a brother enough to call him out.
12:12

I’m posting this video compilation and explanation to document contradictions and moral/ethical inconsistencies in how Kirk Cameron has handled public criticism following his promotion of annihilationism, and to publicly call him to repent - not so much for his false and dangerous beliefs about hell, but about how he has sinfully responded to disagreement and correction. This became necessary after Kirk went to CBN (a platform that has promoted Benny Hinn, Joyce Meyer, Kenneth Copeland, T.D. Jakes, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, Todd White, Bill Johnson, etc.) to whitewash the record and level accusations against his brothers yet again. This is not about tone, personality, or online drama. It is about accountability for public teaching. Before anything else, I want to be clear about what I am and am not saying. I am not accusing Kirk Cameron of being an unbeliever. I am not claiming he is outside the faith. I am not “outing” him as something other than a brother in Christ. And although I believe annihilationism is a formal theological heresy, I am not declaring Kirk himself to be a heretic. I do not know him personally. My concern is not personal animus, but repentance where error exists, and more broadly, the integrity of Christian engagement with one another online, which must be governed by Scripture even when that engagement is difficult or uncomfortable. Because Protestia was the original “heresy hunter” website that drew 3rd-party attention to Kirk's podcast, I also want to clarify something plainly. Protestia accurately characterized and quoted Kirk. We did not rebuke him. We did not accuse him of heresy. We did not editorialize on his theology. We quoted his words directly, provided clips, and linked to his full podcast. Our reporting brought the issue into the open, led to dozens, if not hundreds, of corrective sermons around the country, as well as men like Albert Mohler, Justin Peters, Ray Comfort, and Todd Friel providing lengthy, corrective responses. In response to Kirk's rebuke of "sin sniffers" and "heresy hunters," looking for people to attack so our "ministries don't dry up," it must be said that neither Protestia nor I, as its publisher, earn any profit from this work. I operate without a salary, without ad profit tied to outrage, and without financial incentive to manufacture controversy. We also publish a clear, accessible set of doctrinal and editorial standards that invite accountability. Readers are encouraged to evaluate our reporting against those standards at any time. With sadness, I report the following ongoing hypocricies, errors, and sins, call for public repentance, and call on fellow public Christian ministers who confirm the public witness of the evidence to call Kirk to repentance as well: First, Kirk repeatedly characterizes annihilationism as a secondary issue, something Christians may disagree on without serious consequence. Yet in Episode 86, he frames the potential error of teaching ECTorment as a first-tier moral offense, calling it a “severe misrepresentation of God’s character” and “a great sin and mistake.” In effect, annihilationism’s potential error is treated as second-tier, while ECT’s potential error is framed as first-tier. His critics are condemned for strong language, even though his own framing assigns a clear double standard. Second, Kirk continues to publicly accuse unnamed brothers of unspecified sins against him. He speaks of “sin sniffers,” “heresy hunters,” and brothers behaving like unbelievers, yet never names who supposedly sinned or what sin was committed. Scripture does not authorize anonymous moral indictment. Accusation without identification prevents repentance, response, or clarification. Third, Kirk makes public claims about what Scripture teaches, on a public platform, for a mass audience, while insisting that responses to those claims must occur privately. This is incoherent. Public teaching creates public responsibility. A teacher cannot embrace the delegated authority of public instruction while exempting himself from open, public evaluation. Fourth, in the CBN interview, Kirk reframes the controversy as a surprising overreaction to an off-the-cuff question from his son. The episode itself shows otherwise. Episode 86 was planned, structured, cited, and presented as a “dangerous conversation.” He named specific theological positions, referenced Edward Fudge, and declared a personal conclusion. This was not accidental commentary, and it was not unexpected that it would draw strong reaction. Fifth, Kirk gives contradictory explanations for how he formed his beliefs. In attempting to minimize the doctrinal seriousness of ECT, he says he held to it only because of tradition, then says "verses" brought him to it, and continues to insinuate that ECT proponents today rely on tradition rather than Scripture. Sixth, Kirk repeatedly accuses online critics of illegitimate financial motives, claiming their analysis and arguments were driven by clicks, outrage, or income. At the same time, he presents his own financial concerns, canceled events, and lost opportunities as legitimate considerations. Financial motive is treated as sinful when attributed to others and understandable when attributed to himself. Seventh, Kirk appealed to many ECT teachers as fellow serious scriptural scholars, yet only listed figures who had passed away and could neither reject his conclusions nor correct his use of their authority. Living theologians who object are portrayed as divisive; dead ones are cited as allies. Eighth, Kirk openly admits that he wants annihilationism to be true, calls it a “great relief,” and imagines the joy of presenting annihilationism as "good news" to unbelievers who reject a God who eternally punishes. This is not a neutral inquiry. It is not merely "asking questions." It is doctrinal modification shaped by emotional desires - precisely the method Scripture warns against. Scripture does not require private confrontation before public correction when the teaching itself was public. Matthew 18 governs private interpersonal sin, not public doctrine. When error is public, correction must be public for the sake of those who heard it. Paul rebuked Peter publicly because the error was public. Elders are commanded to refute false teaching openly. Demanding private correction for public doctrine protects the teacher while leaving the audience confused. That is not loving. It prioritizes reputation over truth and the flock over no one. Public correction is not unchristian. It is biblical. It protects those exposed to error and provides clarity rather than silence. Jesus’ parable in Luke 16 about stewardship applies here. Teachers are not owners of doctrine; they are stewards of it. The steward is condemned not for dishonesty alone, but for handling what belonged to another according to his own preferences. Doctrine is not ours to reshape according to emotional comfort or perceived evangelistic usefulness. Faithfulness, not palatability, is the measure of stewardship. The gospel cannot be separated from what Christ saves us from. Hell is not a minor doctrine, and it is not ours to soften for relief or rhetorical safety. This video is not about malice. It is about accountability, witness, and loving a brother enough to call him out.

David Morrill

18,253 次观看 • 8 个月前

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-
0:38

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-

Gbenga Samuel-Wemimo

28,735 次观看 • 1 年前