Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇦🇶 ICE - 7 EMPIRE STATE BUILDINGS DEEP, 1.2M YEARS OLD That’s how far scientists drilled into Antarctic - 2.7 kilometers down, through 1.2 million years of Earth’s climate history. Each layer: ancient snow, volcano ash, trapped air. Like a frozen time machine. CO₂ stayed between 170–300 ppm that... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,863,901 subscribers

183,765 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilik Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The natural range of deuterium in drinking water on Earth is 90 to 160 ppm. Where you fall within that range depends entirely on where you live — and almost nobody tracking their health knows this. The measurement data comes from István Fórizs — Hungarian geochemist and isotope hydrologist who studies the movement and distribution of isotopes through water systems in nature. Ocean water carries 156 ppm — the reference point and the highest deuterium concentration found in liquid water under normal conditions. Tropical and high-evaporation lakes such as Lake Chad and Lake Van in Turkey sit at approximately 160 ppm because evaporation concentrates deuterium — lighter water evaporates first and heavier water remains. Mediterranean precipitation trends toward the higher end of the range. Northern Europe trends progressively lower moving north. Greenland and Antarctic ice sit between 90 and 110 ppm — the most deuterium-depleted natural water found on Earth's surface. The continental effect explains the geography. Water evaporating from the ocean forms clouds. As those clouds move inland, each rainfall removes heavier isotopes preferentially — the remaining vapor becomes progressively lighter. By the time precipitation reaches the center of a continent it carries significantly less deuterium than coastal rain. Temperature adds another layer. Precipitation in Budapest measures 152 ppm in summer and 132 ppm in winter. A 20 ppm variation driven purely by temperature — the same city, every year. But tap water tells a more complex story. Most drinking water in Hungary comes from groundwater — an accumulated average of precipitation over time that leans slightly toward winter values because winter precipitation infiltrates the ground at higher rates than summer precipitation, which tends to evaporate before reaching the aquifer. Some of that groundwater infiltrated the earth during the ice age — over 11,000 years ago — when global temperatures were significantly lower. It carries less deuterium than modern precipitation from the same region because the planet was colder when it fell. The geological record of temperature is readable in the deuterium content of ancient groundwater. Which means the deuterium content of your drinking water is shaped not just by where you live today — but by the climatic history of the region over thousands of years. The gap between ~90 ppm Antarctic melted snow and ~160 ppm tropical/evaporative water spans most of the biologically active window that Professor Roman Zubarev from Karolinska Institute identified as regulating cell growth. Your mitochondria are navigating this variable every single day. Geography is a biological input.

The natural range of deuterium in drinking water on Earth is 90 to 160 ppm. Where you fall within that range depends entirely on where you live — and almost nobody tracking their health knows this. The measurement data comes from István Fórizs — Hungarian geochemist and isotope hydrologist who studies the movement and distribution of isotopes through water systems in nature. Ocean water carries 156 ppm — the reference point and the highest deuterium concentration found in liquid water under normal conditions. Tropical and high-evaporation lakes such as Lake Chad and Lake Van in Turkey sit at approximately 160 ppm because evaporation concentrates deuterium — lighter water evaporates first and heavier water remains. Mediterranean precipitation trends toward the higher end of the range. Northern Europe trends progressively lower moving north. Greenland and Antarctic ice sit between 90 and 110 ppm — the most deuterium-depleted natural water found on Earth's surface. The continental effect explains the geography. Water evaporating from the ocean forms clouds. As those clouds move inland, each rainfall removes heavier isotopes preferentially — the remaining vapor becomes progressively lighter. By the time precipitation reaches the center of a continent it carries significantly less deuterium than coastal rain. Temperature adds another layer. Precipitation in Budapest measures 152 ppm in summer and 132 ppm in winter. A 20 ppm variation driven purely by temperature — the same city, every year. But tap water tells a more complex story. Most drinking water in Hungary comes from groundwater — an accumulated average of precipitation over time that leans slightly toward winter values because winter precipitation infiltrates the ground at higher rates than summer precipitation, which tends to evaporate before reaching the aquifer. Some of that groundwater infiltrated the earth during the ice age — over 11,000 years ago — when global temperatures were significantly lower. It carries less deuterium than modern precipitation from the same region because the planet was colder when it fell. The geological record of temperature is readable in the deuterium content of ancient groundwater. Which means the deuterium content of your drinking water is shaped not just by where you live today — but by the climatic history of the region over thousands of years. The gap between ~90 ppm Antarctic melted snow and ~160 ppm tropical/evaporative water spans most of the biologically active window that Professor Roman Zubarev from Karolinska Institute identified as regulating cell growth. Your mitochondria are navigating this variable every single day. Geography is a biological input.

no.mind

13,764 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

42 Years Ago CBS Told The World Earth’s Temperature Was Rising Out Of Control Due To Burning Coal & Oil 25% of Florida is about to be flooded and a “widespread disruption of agriculture” is coming It’s been 42 years and literally nothing has changed. “Concerned about rising temperatures on planet Earth heated up a hearing here in Washington today. For years, scientists have theorized about the dangers of the so called greenhouse effect, the warming of the Earth's atmosphere due to the burning of coal and oil. And in recent months, as David Culhane reports, research has uncovered facts to support that theory. Many scientists claim that the temperature of the atmosphere has been rising over the past 100 years, that the great sheets of pack ice in Antarctica are melting at a much more rapid rate than previously. Finally, that the sea level has been rising with increasing swiftness over the past 40 years. If these scientists are correct, about 25% of Florida would be flooded along with low lying areas all over the world. Climate changes could produce widespread disruption of agriculture. The American farm belt might be too dry and the wheat and corn crops would have to move to Canada. Scientists blame the odorless, colorless carbon dioxide gas for these potentially dangerous changes around the planet. It is the greenhouse effect. The gas allows sunlight to filter down and warm the Earth, but like the glass of a greenhouse, the carbon dioxide tends to trap heat so that it cannot rise into space. The scientists maintain that the coal, oil, and gas we've been burning for a 100 years have produced more and more carbon dioxide and helped overheat the Earth. Now some political leaders endorse the demands for more C02 monitoring stations like this one in Hawaii, and they share the anger of the scientists at Reagan administration budget cuts at a time when they feel closer to getting definitive answers. We are not doing the kind of research that we should be doing to determine whether or not these scientists who are so alarmed are correct in their assessment. And what they find out will affect the lives and fortunes of millions of people, the very survival of cities like this one (See video), David Culhane, CBS News, New York.

42 Years Ago CBS Told The World Earth’s Temperature Was Rising Out Of Control Due To Burning Coal & Oil 25% of Florida is about to be flooded and a “widespread disruption of agriculture” is coming It’s been 42 years and literally nothing has changed. “Concerned about rising temperatures on planet Earth heated up a hearing here in Washington today. For years, scientists have theorized about the dangers of the so called greenhouse effect, the warming of the Earth's atmosphere due to the burning of coal and oil. And in recent months, as David Culhane reports, research has uncovered facts to support that theory. Many scientists claim that the temperature of the atmosphere has been rising over the past 100 years, that the great sheets of pack ice in Antarctica are melting at a much more rapid rate than previously. Finally, that the sea level has been rising with increasing swiftness over the past 40 years. If these scientists are correct, about 25% of Florida would be flooded along with low lying areas all over the world. Climate changes could produce widespread disruption of agriculture. The American farm belt might be too dry and the wheat and corn crops would have to move to Canada. Scientists blame the odorless, colorless carbon dioxide gas for these potentially dangerous changes around the planet. It is the greenhouse effect. The gas allows sunlight to filter down and warm the Earth, but like the glass of a greenhouse, the carbon dioxide tends to trap heat so that it cannot rise into space. The scientists maintain that the coal, oil, and gas we've been burning for a 100 years have produced more and more carbon dioxide and helped overheat the Earth. Now some political leaders endorse the demands for more C02 monitoring stations like this one in Hawaii, and they share the anger of the scientists at Reagan administration budget cuts at a time when they feel closer to getting definitive answers. We are not doing the kind of research that we should be doing to determine whether or not these scientists who are so alarmed are correct in their assessment. And what they find out will affect the lives and fortunes of millions of people, the very survival of cities like this one (See video), David Culhane, CBS News, New York.

Wall Street Apes

2,192,371 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

😳 They Moved a 300-Ton Stone Without Machines… and It’s Still Standing After 3,500 Years Deep in the heart of ancient Egypt stands a place so enormous and mysterious that even modern visitors struggle to believe it was built thousands of years ago. This is the legendary Karnak Temple — one of the largest religious temple complexes ever created on Earth. For over 2,000 years, generation after generation of pharaohs kept expanding Karnak, filling it with gigantic columns, sacred lakes, hidden chambers, towering statues, and massive stone monuments dedicated to the gods. Walking through it today feels less like visiting ruins… and more like entering another world frozen in time. But among all its wonders, one monument leaves people completely speechless. Hidden inside the temple stands the incredible Obelisk of Pharaoh Thutmose I — a giant stone carved more than 3,500 years ago that still seems almost impossible. Cut from a SINGLE piece of red granite, this enormous obelisk rises nearly 72 feet into the sky and weighs more than 300 tons. No steel cranes. No trucks. No modern machines. Just ancient human hands. And that is where the mystery begins. How did workers carve such a perfect monument from solid stone? How did they transport something this massive across long distances in the brutal Egyptian heat? And even more unbelievable… how did they raise it perfectly upright with astonishing precision? Even today, experts still debate the exact methods used. Imagine standing in Karnak thousands of years ago as the sunlight struck the polished granite, making the obelisk glow like fire during sacred ceremonies. To the ancient Egyptians, obelisks were not just decorations. They were symbols of divine power — giant stone connections between the heavens and Earth itself. The surface is still covered with ancient inscriptions whispering stories from a civilization long gone. Empires have risen and collapsed. Wars have destroyed kingdoms. Entire civilizations disappeared into dust. Yet this giant stone still stands. That is what makes Karnak so hauntingly fascinating. These ruins are not simply old stones abandoned in the desert. They are proof that ancient civilizations possessed knowledge, engineering, and determination far beyond what many people imagine. And standing beneath this towering obelisk today, one question still echoes through the minds of visitors from around the world: What else did the ancient Egyptians know… that we have forgotten? 👁️

😳 They Moved a 300-Ton Stone Without Machines… and It’s Still Standing After 3,500 Years Deep in the heart of ancient Egypt stands a place so enormous and mysterious that even modern visitors struggle to believe it was built thousands of years ago. This is the legendary Karnak Temple — one of the largest religious temple complexes ever created on Earth. For over 2,000 years, generation after generation of pharaohs kept expanding Karnak, filling it with gigantic columns, sacred lakes, hidden chambers, towering statues, and massive stone monuments dedicated to the gods. Walking through it today feels less like visiting ruins… and more like entering another world frozen in time. But among all its wonders, one monument leaves people completely speechless. Hidden inside the temple stands the incredible Obelisk of Pharaoh Thutmose I — a giant stone carved more than 3,500 years ago that still seems almost impossible. Cut from a SINGLE piece of red granite, this enormous obelisk rises nearly 72 feet into the sky and weighs more than 300 tons. No steel cranes. No trucks. No modern machines. Just ancient human hands. And that is where the mystery begins. How did workers carve such a perfect monument from solid stone? How did they transport something this massive across long distances in the brutal Egyptian heat? And even more unbelievable… how did they raise it perfectly upright with astonishing precision? Even today, experts still debate the exact methods used. Imagine standing in Karnak thousands of years ago as the sunlight struck the polished granite, making the obelisk glow like fire during sacred ceremonies. To the ancient Egyptians, obelisks were not just decorations. They were symbols of divine power — giant stone connections between the heavens and Earth itself. The surface is still covered with ancient inscriptions whispering stories from a civilization long gone. Empires have risen and collapsed. Wars have destroyed kingdoms. Entire civilizations disappeared into dust. Yet this giant stone still stands. That is what makes Karnak so hauntingly fascinating. These ruins are not simply old stones abandoned in the desert. They are proof that ancient civilizations possessed knowledge, engineering, and determination far beyond what many people imagine. And standing beneath this towering obelisk today, one question still echoes through the minds of visitors from around the world: What else did the ancient Egyptians know… that we have forgotten? 👁️

Unearthed 🏺

11,672 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Ancient Ice in Scorching Sands: How Persians Built Desert Freezers at least 2,500 Years Ago! While Romans were mastering grain storage, Persian engineers were doing something that sounds impossible, making ice in 40 degrees Celsius desert heat, without electricity, without refrigeration, without any modern technology. They built massive dome structures called yakhchals that could store 5,000 tons of ice through scorching summers lasting six months. These weren’t just holes in the ground, they were precision engineered thermal machines that defied physics. Here’s how they worked. In winter, Persians would flood shallow pools at night when desert temperatures plummeted below freezing. By morning, they’d harvest sheets of ice and rush them into the Yakhchal before sunrise. But storing ice isn’t the hard part. Keeping it frozen through summer is. The genius was in the architecture. The domes stood 60 feet tall, with walls 6 feet thick, made of a special mortar called saruj, a mix of sand, clay, egg whites, lime, goat hair, and ash. This created an ancient form of insulation that blocked heat transfer. But insulation alone wasn’t enough. They built massive walls called bodgears, wind catchers, on the north side. These caught cold night winds and funneled them down into underground channels that ran beneath the ice storage. The wind naturally cooled before entering the chamber. The dome shape was critical. Hot air rose to the top and escaped through a vent at the peak, while the ice sat in the coolest layer at the bottom. convection created constant airflow without any mechanical system. Some yakhchals were connected to kanats, underground aqueducts that brought mountain water. The flowing water added evaporative cooling, dropping the temperature even further. The result? Ice cream and frozen desserts in the middle of the Persian desert 400 BCE. Wealthy merchants would pay fortunes for a single cup of ice. Many of these structures still stand in Iran today, 2,000 years later, a testament to engineering that worked with nature instead of against it. Here are some more informative videos about yakhchals (ancient Persian ice houses) These explain the history, engineering, and how they worked in the desert heat: 1The Genius Design of the Ancient Persian Yakhchal | 2500 Year Old Freezers in the Deserts of Iran – Covers the structure, cooling system, and historical use in Iran. Watch here: 2Ancient Ice House Invented In 400 BCE? Yakhchals In Iran– Details the invention around 400 BCE, architecture in cities like Yazd, and restoration efforts. Watch here: 3Ancient Ice-Making Machines - The Yakhchāl in Persian Desert – A short overview of the evaporative cooling and dome design from 400 BC. 3 Watch here: 4The Yakhchāl: Ancient Ice-Making Machines in the Desert – Focuses on the “ice pit” technology and subterranean storage. Watch here:

Ancient Ice in Scorching Sands: How Persians Built Desert Freezers at least 2,500 Years Ago! While Romans were mastering grain storage, Persian engineers were doing something that sounds impossible, making ice in 40 degrees Celsius desert heat, without electricity, without refrigeration, without any modern technology. They built massive dome structures called yakhchals that could store 5,000 tons of ice through scorching summers lasting six months. These weren’t just holes in the ground, they were precision engineered thermal machines that defied physics. Here’s how they worked. In winter, Persians would flood shallow pools at night when desert temperatures plummeted below freezing. By morning, they’d harvest sheets of ice and rush them into the Yakhchal before sunrise. But storing ice isn’t the hard part. Keeping it frozen through summer is. The genius was in the architecture. The domes stood 60 feet tall, with walls 6 feet thick, made of a special mortar called saruj, a mix of sand, clay, egg whites, lime, goat hair, and ash. This created an ancient form of insulation that blocked heat transfer. But insulation alone wasn’t enough. They built massive walls called bodgears, wind catchers, on the north side. These caught cold night winds and funneled them down into underground channels that ran beneath the ice storage. The wind naturally cooled before entering the chamber. The dome shape was critical. Hot air rose to the top and escaped through a vent at the peak, while the ice sat in the coolest layer at the bottom. convection created constant airflow without any mechanical system. Some yakhchals were connected to kanats, underground aqueducts that brought mountain water. The flowing water added evaporative cooling, dropping the temperature even further. The result? Ice cream and frozen desserts in the middle of the Persian desert 400 BCE. Wealthy merchants would pay fortunes for a single cup of ice. Many of these structures still stand in Iran today, 2,000 years later, a testament to engineering that worked with nature instead of against it. Here are some more informative videos about yakhchals (ancient Persian ice houses) These explain the history, engineering, and how they worked in the desert heat: 1The Genius Design of the Ancient Persian Yakhchal | 2500 Year Old Freezers in the Deserts of Iran – Covers the structure, cooling system, and historical use in Iran. Watch here: 2Ancient Ice House Invented In 400 BCE? Yakhchals In Iran– Details the invention around 400 BCE, architecture in cities like Yazd, and restoration efforts. Watch here: 3Ancient Ice-Making Machines - The Yakhchāl in Persian Desert – A short overview of the evaporative cooling and dome design from 400 BC. 3 Watch here: 4The Yakhchāl: Ancient Ice-Making Machines in the Desert – Focuses on the “ice pit” technology and subterranean storage. Watch here:

GP Q

24,016 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Secretary of State Marco Rubio's full speech today at the 2026 Munich Security Conference. Excerpt: "At the time of that first (1963 Munich Security Conference) gathering, Soviet communism was on the march. Thousands of years of Western civilization hung in the balance. At that time, victory was far from certain. But we were driven by a common purpose. We were unified not just by what we were fighting against; we were unified by what we were fighting for. And together, Europe and America prevailed and a continent was rebuilt. Our people prospered. In time, the East and West blocs were reunited. A civilization was once again made whole. "That infamous wall that had cleaved this nation into two came down, and with it an evil empire, and the East and West became one again. But the euphoria of this triumph led us to a dangerous delusion: that we had entered, quote, 'the end of history;' that every nation would now be a liberal democracy; that the ties formed by trade and by commerce alone would now replace nationhood; that the rules-based global order – an overused term – would now replace the national interest; and that we would now live in a world without borders where everyone became a citizen of the world." .

Secretary of State Marco Rubio's full speech today at the 2026 Munich Security Conference. Excerpt: "At the time of that first (1963 Munich Security Conference) gathering, Soviet communism was on the march. Thousands of years of Western civilization hung in the balance. At that time, victory was far from certain. But we were driven by a common purpose. We were unified not just by what we were fighting against; we were unified by what we were fighting for. And together, Europe and America prevailed and a continent was rebuilt. Our people prospered. In time, the East and West blocs were reunited. A civilization was once again made whole. "That infamous wall that had cleaved this nation into two came down, and with it an evil empire, and the East and West became one again. But the euphoria of this triumph led us to a dangerous delusion: that we had entered, quote, 'the end of history;' that every nation would now be a liberal democracy; that the ties formed by trade and by commerce alone would now replace nationhood; that the rules-based global order – an overused term – would now replace the national interest; and that we would now live in a world without borders where everyone became a citizen of the world." .

Paul Villarreal (AKA Vince Manfeld)

58,040 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Ponca City Carbon Black: The mystery isn't with the source. The mystery is why the state insists there's no problems. As a lifelong resident, we've known about it for years. The first court settlement from years ago was a dead giveaway. They bought themselves out of being shut down. They bought properties around the plant. Chased family's away from their homes. And then they ignored everyone else. The EPA forced them to make changes to all of their plants across the country. One had to shut down because they couldn't make those changes. The other .... Stayed open. Fast forward to 2026, and it's back. This time with Taiwan owners. It's everywhere. Walk into any building in Ponca and look at the floors....the sidewalks .. the sides of buildings....roofs....your dog's feet .... It's everywhere. Our state DEQ received complaints and didn't investigate it quick enough, and their reply: we don't see it happening. Well no kidding. When you wait a week to make a visit... So, what did they do? They installed air monitors all over Ponca. Not just by city hall....down by the south side of town....and where I am, about 1/2 mile north of their plant. Guess what they measure? PPM of the air. Not type... Not makeup...just the PPM. They had no proof there was an issue. Last week we made the proof. We recorded it from work. Now what will be their excuse? DEQ is failing around here and it doesn't seem like anyone cares except the residents of Ponca. Here are the 3 videos we made. All on a Sunday afternoon...when DEQ wouldn't even be open. Where's that black soot going? Right where the wind takes it. They need to pay to clean this entire town up... Or they need to leave.

Ponca City Carbon Black: The mystery isn't with the source. The mystery is why the state insists there's no problems. As a lifelong resident, we've known about it for years. The first court settlement from years ago was a dead giveaway. They bought themselves out of being shut down. They bought properties around the plant. Chased family's away from their homes. And then they ignored everyone else. The EPA forced them to make changes to all of their plants across the country. One had to shut down because they couldn't make those changes. The other .... Stayed open. Fast forward to 2026, and it's back. This time with Taiwan owners. It's everywhere. Walk into any building in Ponca and look at the floors....the sidewalks .. the sides of buildings....roofs....your dog's feet .... It's everywhere. Our state DEQ received complaints and didn't investigate it quick enough, and their reply: we don't see it happening. Well no kidding. When you wait a week to make a visit... So, what did they do? They installed air monitors all over Ponca. Not just by city hall....down by the south side of town....and where I am, about 1/2 mile north of their plant. Guess what they measure? PPM of the air. Not type... Not makeup...just the PPM. They had no proof there was an issue. Last week we made the proof. We recorded it from work. Now what will be their excuse? DEQ is failing around here and it doesn't seem like anyone cares except the residents of Ponca. Here are the 3 videos we made. All on a Sunday afternoon...when DEQ wouldn't even be open. Where's that black soot going? Right where the wind takes it. They need to pay to clean this entire town up... Or they need to leave.

🇺🇸 Grumpy Dool 🇺🇸

12,272 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

??? How on earth did ancient humans—thousands of years ago, armed with nothing but chisels, hammers, and sheer stubbornness—manage to carve absolute colossi out of solid rock, feats that would make modern engineers sweat?Take the Kailasa Temple at Ellora, India. This isn’t a building. It’s a mountain that someone decided to turn into a temple… from the top down.Imagine this: they started at the top of a cliff and carved downward, removing stone layer by layer, never able to make a single mistake—because there was no “undo.” One slip, and the whole thing collapses or gets ruined forever.The result? A completely freestanding, multi-level temple complex literally sculpted out of a single monolithic rock. The base courtyard alone measures 82 × 46 meters (that’s bigger than a football field) and plunges 30 meters deep. Total floor area: over 2,000 square meters of intricate halls, pillars, life-sized elephants, and gods staring down at create it, the builders of the Rashtrakuta Empire (8th century CE) had to excavate roughly 200,000 tons of solid basalt over about 20 years. That’s 27 tons of rock—every single day—hacked, chipped, and hauled away… by hand. With bronze tools. No power tools, no explosives, no cranes.And just to flex a little harder: in the same cliff face, they also carved 33 additional rock-cut caves and sculptures, like it was no big deal.Look at those perfectly symmetrical pillars, the delicate lattice work, the massive statues that weigh hundreds of tons yet balance on tiny points of contact. Then try telling me—honestly—that this was done with the same level of technology we casually assume “primitive” people had.Either the Rashtrakuta had techniques, tools, or knowledge we’ve completely lost… or we’re seriously underestimating just how advanced the ancient world really was.

??? How on earth did ancient humans—thousands of years ago, armed with nothing but chisels, hammers, and sheer stubbornness—manage to carve absolute colossi out of solid rock, feats that would make modern engineers sweat?Take the Kailasa Temple at Ellora, India. This isn’t a building. It’s a mountain that someone decided to turn into a temple… from the top down.Imagine this: they started at the top of a cliff and carved downward, removing stone layer by layer, never able to make a single mistake—because there was no “undo.” One slip, and the whole thing collapses or gets ruined forever.The result? A completely freestanding, multi-level temple complex literally sculpted out of a single monolithic rock. The base courtyard alone measures 82 × 46 meters (that’s bigger than a football field) and plunges 30 meters deep. Total floor area: over 2,000 square meters of intricate halls, pillars, life-sized elephants, and gods staring down at create it, the builders of the Rashtrakuta Empire (8th century CE) had to excavate roughly 200,000 tons of solid basalt over about 20 years. That’s 27 tons of rock—every single day—hacked, chipped, and hauled away… by hand. With bronze tools. No power tools, no explosives, no cranes.And just to flex a little harder: in the same cliff face, they also carved 33 additional rock-cut caves and sculptures, like it was no big deal.Look at those perfectly symmetrical pillars, the delicate lattice work, the massive statues that weigh hundreds of tons yet balance on tiny points of contact. Then try telling me—honestly—that this was done with the same level of technology we casually assume “primitive” people had.Either the Rashtrakuta had techniques, tools, or knowledge we’ve completely lost… or we’re seriously underestimating just how advanced the ancient world really was.

Black Hole

72,749 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Crater Lake is almost 2,000 feet deep because 7,700 years ago, a 12,000-foot volcano collapsed into itself. That’s what makes the place so interesting. You aren’t looking at a normal mountain lake in southern Oregon. You’re looking at what remains of Mount Mazama, a huge Cascade volcano that once rose roughly 12,000 feet above sea level. Then it erupted. The eruption was one of the largest on Earth in the last 12,000 years. Ash and rock were blasted high into the atmosphere, and pyroclastic flows tore through the surrounding valleys. So much magma escaped from beneath Mount Mazama that the upper part of the mountain could no longer support itself. The summit collapsed, leaving behind a basin roughly five to six miles across. Over time, rain and snow filled it. Crater Lake has no rivers flowing into it and no river carrying water out. The lake is fed mostly by precipitation, and evaporation and seepage help keep the water level fairly stable. At 1,943 feet, it’s the deepest lake in the United States. That depth is also part of the reason the water looks so blue. On a clear day, the color can look almost unreal. The lake is so deep and clear that longer wavelengths of light are absorbed, while blue light is scattered back toward your eyes. Then there’s Wizard Island. It looks like a small cone sitting in the lake, but it’s actually another volcano that formed after Mount Mazama collapsed. Most of it is underwater. Volcanic activity continued inside the caldera for thousands of years after the main eruption. People were here before all of this happened. Archaeologists have found human artifacts beneath the ash and pumice from Mount Mazama, showing that Native people were using this area before the eruption. The area later became deeply important to the Klamath people and other Native communities. That’s worth knowing before you visit because Crater Lake can easily become one of those places where you stop, take the obvious photo, and leave. The first view from the rim is incredible on its own. Forest gives way to steep cliffs and a huge stretch of blue water filling the remains of a mountain that disappeared thousands of years ago. If I were planning the trip, I’d go in summer or early fall, when more of the park is usually open. Crater Lake gets a huge amount of snow, and parts of Rim Drive can stay closed well into summer depending on the year. But whenever you go, remember what you’re actually looking at. Those cliffs were once part of a mountain. Wizard Island is a volcano growing inside the ruins of another volcano. And nearly 2,000 feet of water now fills the space where Mount Mazama’s summit once stood. Crater Lake is impressive when you first see it. It’s even better once you know the story. That’s the kind of place I write about in the Timeless Traveler newsletter. Not just where to go, but the story that makes a place worth remembering. Subscribe if that’s your kind of travel.

Crater Lake is almost 2,000 feet deep because 7,700 years ago, a 12,000-foot volcano collapsed into itself. That’s what makes the place so interesting. You aren’t looking at a normal mountain lake in southern Oregon. You’re looking at what remains of Mount Mazama, a huge Cascade volcano that once rose roughly 12,000 feet above sea level. Then it erupted. The eruption was one of the largest on Earth in the last 12,000 years. Ash and rock were blasted high into the atmosphere, and pyroclastic flows tore through the surrounding valleys. So much magma escaped from beneath Mount Mazama that the upper part of the mountain could no longer support itself. The summit collapsed, leaving behind a basin roughly five to six miles across. Over time, rain and snow filled it. Crater Lake has no rivers flowing into it and no river carrying water out. The lake is fed mostly by precipitation, and evaporation and seepage help keep the water level fairly stable. At 1,943 feet, it’s the deepest lake in the United States. That depth is also part of the reason the water looks so blue. On a clear day, the color can look almost unreal. The lake is so deep and clear that longer wavelengths of light are absorbed, while blue light is scattered back toward your eyes. Then there’s Wizard Island. It looks like a small cone sitting in the lake, but it’s actually another volcano that formed after Mount Mazama collapsed. Most of it is underwater. Volcanic activity continued inside the caldera for thousands of years after the main eruption. People were here before all of this happened. Archaeologists have found human artifacts beneath the ash and pumice from Mount Mazama, showing that Native people were using this area before the eruption. The area later became deeply important to the Klamath people and other Native communities. That’s worth knowing before you visit because Crater Lake can easily become one of those places where you stop, take the obvious photo, and leave. The first view from the rim is incredible on its own. Forest gives way to steep cliffs and a huge stretch of blue water filling the remains of a mountain that disappeared thousands of years ago. If I were planning the trip, I’d go in summer or early fall, when more of the park is usually open. Crater Lake gets a huge amount of snow, and parts of Rim Drive can stay closed well into summer depending on the year. But whenever you go, remember what you’re actually looking at. Those cliffs were once part of a mountain. Wizard Island is a volcano growing inside the ruins of another volcano. And nearly 2,000 feet of water now fills the space where Mount Mazama’s summit once stood. Crater Lake is impressive when you first see it. It’s even better once you know the story. That’s the kind of place I write about in the Timeless Traveler newsletter. Not just where to go, but the story that makes a place worth remembering. Subscribe if that’s your kind of travel.

The Timeless Traveler 🇺🇸

49,186 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

You have heard of Atlantis, the island civilization that vanished beneath the sea. What you may not know is that Plato gave a precise date for when it sank, and that modern science has found a real event that happened at almost exactly that moment. First, it is worth remembering what Plato actually wrote. We tend to treat Atlantis as a myth he invented. But in his dialogues Timaeus and Critias, written around 360 BC, Plato does not present it as a fable or an allegory at all... The story, he says, had been carried to Athens by the great lawgiver Solon, who had traveled to Egypt and heard it from the priests of the city of Sais, keepers of records far older than Greece. One old priest tells Solon: "O Solon, Solon, you Hellenes are never anything but children, and there is not an old man among you." The Greeks, he says, have forgotten their own past, while the Egyptians had written it down. And the priest gives a specific timeframe. The war between the Proto-Athenians and Atlantis, he says, took place 9,000 years before Solon's visit. Then, in Plato's words: "there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune... the island of Atlantis disappeared in the depths of the sea." Nine thousand years before Solon places the event at roughly 11,600 years ago. And here is where it becomes strange... That date, 11,600 years ago, is almost exactly when one of the most dramatic climate transitions in the recent history of the planet came to an end. Geologists call it the Younger Dryas: a period when the Earth, already warming out of the last Ice Age, suddenly plunged back into near-glacial cold for more than a thousand years. According to modern science, that cold period ended around 11,600 years ago, and it ended abruptly. The warming returned with great speed, and the great ice sheets resumed melting. That melting is the part that matters here. Some scientists have identified a phase of rapid sea-level rise at the close of the Younger Dryas, beginning around 11,500 years ago, known as Meltwater Pulse 1B. The studies that support it describe sea levels surging upward as the ice sheets collapsed, drowning coastlines that had stood for thousands of years. Plato's date for the sinking of Atlantis, in other words, falls almost exactly on the moment when modern science says the oceans may have risen suddenly and swallowed land at the end of the Ice Age. I want to be careful and honest here: none of this proves that Atlantis was real. Most scholars believe Plato invented the story to illustrate his ideas about pride and the fall of great civilizations, and they may well be right. But the coincidence is hard to shake. A philosopher in the fourth century BC, insisting he was recording true history passed down from a people who kept ancient records, said that a great land was destroyed by floods roughly 11,600 years ago. And thousands of years later, with ice cores and radiocarbon dating, we discovered that the last Ice Age really did end at almost exactly that moment, in melting ice and rising seas. Plato could not have known any of this. He had no way to date the end of the Ice Age, no way to know that the oceans had once risen and erased the old coastlines of the world. And yet the moment he chose, for the drowning of his lost civilization, is the same moment the seas truly rose. Perhaps it's just a coincidence. Or perhaps the Egyptians, as the priest told Solon, simply remembered something the rest of us forgot. Maybe we really are a species with amnesia... I started this newsletter because our past is extraordinary, and fewer and fewer people are showing us how to truly see it. Every week I try to. If that is something you would like to be part of, you can join at the link below, and if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible: Thanks for reading.

You have heard of Atlantis, the island civilization that vanished beneath the sea. What you may not know is that Plato gave a precise date for when it sank, and that modern science has found a real event that happened at almost exactly that moment. First, it is worth remembering what Plato actually wrote. We tend to treat Atlantis as a myth he invented. But in his dialogues Timaeus and Critias, written around 360 BC, Plato does not present it as a fable or an allegory at all... The story, he says, had been carried to Athens by the great lawgiver Solon, who had traveled to Egypt and heard it from the priests of the city of Sais, keepers of records far older than Greece. One old priest tells Solon: "O Solon, Solon, you Hellenes are never anything but children, and there is not an old man among you." The Greeks, he says, have forgotten their own past, while the Egyptians had written it down. And the priest gives a specific timeframe. The war between the Proto-Athenians and Atlantis, he says, took place 9,000 years before Solon's visit. Then, in Plato's words: "there occurred violent earthquakes and floods; and in a single day and night of misfortune... the island of Atlantis disappeared in the depths of the sea." Nine thousand years before Solon places the event at roughly 11,600 years ago. And here is where it becomes strange... That date, 11,600 years ago, is almost exactly when one of the most dramatic climate transitions in the recent history of the planet came to an end. Geologists call it the Younger Dryas: a period when the Earth, already warming out of the last Ice Age, suddenly plunged back into near-glacial cold for more than a thousand years. According to modern science, that cold period ended around 11,600 years ago, and it ended abruptly. The warming returned with great speed, and the great ice sheets resumed melting. That melting is the part that matters here. Some scientists have identified a phase of rapid sea-level rise at the close of the Younger Dryas, beginning around 11,500 years ago, known as Meltwater Pulse 1B. The studies that support it describe sea levels surging upward as the ice sheets collapsed, drowning coastlines that had stood for thousands of years. Plato's date for the sinking of Atlantis, in other words, falls almost exactly on the moment when modern science says the oceans may have risen suddenly and swallowed land at the end of the Ice Age. I want to be careful and honest here: none of this proves that Atlantis was real. Most scholars believe Plato invented the story to illustrate his ideas about pride and the fall of great civilizations, and they may well be right. But the coincidence is hard to shake. A philosopher in the fourth century BC, insisting he was recording true history passed down from a people who kept ancient records, said that a great land was destroyed by floods roughly 11,600 years ago. And thousands of years later, with ice cores and radiocarbon dating, we discovered that the last Ice Age really did end at almost exactly that moment, in melting ice and rising seas. Plato could not have known any of this. He had no way to date the end of the Ice Age, no way to know that the oceans had once risen and erased the old coastlines of the world. And yet the moment he chose, for the drowning of his lost civilization, is the same moment the seas truly rose. Perhaps it's just a coincidence. Or perhaps the Egyptians, as the priest told Solon, simply remembered something the rest of us forgot. Maybe we really are a species with amnesia... I started this newsletter because our past is extraordinary, and fewer and fewer people are showing us how to truly see it. Every week I try to. If that is something you would like to be part of, you can join at the link below, and if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible: Thanks for reading.

James Lucas

39,911 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The Five Mass Extinctions That Shaped Life on Earth Earth’s history is marked by periods of extraordinary biological flourishing interrupted by catastrophic die-offs. Paleontologists recognize five major mass extinctions—events in which a large percentage of the planet’s species vanished in a geologically short time. These “Big Five” reshaped ecosystems, opened ecological niches, and ultimately paved the way for the rise of new dominant groups, including the mammals that would one day include us. 1. Ordovician–Silurian Extinction (≈443 million years ago) The first of the great extinctions struck near the end of the Ordovician period. Roughly 85% of marine species disappeared. The primary drivers appear to have been rapid global cooling and the growth of extensive ice sheets over the supercontinent Gondwana. Falling sea levels drained shallow continental shelves—the richest habitats of the time—while changes in ocean chemistry further stressed marine life. Soft-bodied organisms and early reef-builders were especially hard-hit. 2. Late Devonian Extinction (≈375–360 million years ago) This drawn-out crisis unfolded in several pulses over millions of years and eliminated about 75% of species. Marine communities, particularly reef ecosystems built by corals and stromatoporoids, suffered heavily. Proposed causes include widespread oceanic anoxia (oxygen-poor waters), climate fluctuations, and possibly the evolution of land plants, which may have altered nutrient cycles and increased runoff into the oceans. The event cleared the way for the later diversification of early tetrapods and ammonoids. 3. Permian–Triassic Extinction (≈252 million years ago) Often called “The Great Dying,” this was the most severe extinction in Earth’s history. Up to 96% of marine species and roughly 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species vanished. The leading culprit is massive volcanism associated with the Siberian Traps, which released enormous volumes of greenhouse gases, triggered global warming, ocean acidification, and anoxia. Life on land and in the seas was pushed to the brink; recovery took millions of years, and the survivors set the stage for the age of dinosaurs and the first true mammals. 4. Triassic–Jurassic Extinction (≈201 million years ago) Approximately 80% of species disappeared at the end of the Triassic. Large amphibians and many early archosaurs were among the casualties, while the survivors—especially dinosaurs—rapidly diversified afterward. The main trigger is thought to have been intense volcanic activity linked to the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province as the supercontinent Pangaea began to break apart. Climate upheaval, rising CO₂ levels, and possible ocean acidification followed. 5. Cretaceous–Paleogene Extinction (≈66 million years ago) The most famous of the mass extinctions ended the reign of the non-avian dinosaurs and wiped out about 75% of all species. An asteroid roughly 10–15 km in diameter struck what is now the Yucatán Peninsula, creating the Chicxulub crater. The impact, combined with subsequent volcanism from the Deccan Traps, caused global darkness, wildfires, acid rain, and a prolonged “impact winter.” Marine reptiles, flying pterosaurs, and many other groups also vanished, while mammals, birds, and flowering plants inherited a transformed world. These five events underscore both the fragility and the resilience of life. Each extinction pruned the tree of life dramatically, yet the survivors rebounded, innovated, and eventually produced the astonishing biodiversity we see today—including our own species. Studying them remains essential not only for understanding Earth’s deep past but also for recognizing the scale of human-driven changes currently underway.

The Five Mass Extinctions That Shaped Life on Earth Earth’s history is marked by periods of extraordinary biological flourishing interrupted by catastrophic die-offs. Paleontologists recognize five major mass extinctions—events in which a large percentage of the planet’s species vanished in a geologically short time. These “Big Five” reshaped ecosystems, opened ecological niches, and ultimately paved the way for the rise of new dominant groups, including the mammals that would one day include us. 1. Ordovician–Silurian Extinction (≈443 million years ago) The first of the great extinctions struck near the end of the Ordovician period. Roughly 85% of marine species disappeared. The primary drivers appear to have been rapid global cooling and the growth of extensive ice sheets over the supercontinent Gondwana. Falling sea levels drained shallow continental shelves—the richest habitats of the time—while changes in ocean chemistry further stressed marine life. Soft-bodied organisms and early reef-builders were especially hard-hit. 2. Late Devonian Extinction (≈375–360 million years ago) This drawn-out crisis unfolded in several pulses over millions of years and eliminated about 75% of species. Marine communities, particularly reef ecosystems built by corals and stromatoporoids, suffered heavily. Proposed causes include widespread oceanic anoxia (oxygen-poor waters), climate fluctuations, and possibly the evolution of land plants, which may have altered nutrient cycles and increased runoff into the oceans. The event cleared the way for the later diversification of early tetrapods and ammonoids. 3. Permian–Triassic Extinction (≈252 million years ago) Often called “The Great Dying,” this was the most severe extinction in Earth’s history. Up to 96% of marine species and roughly 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species vanished. The leading culprit is massive volcanism associated with the Siberian Traps, which released enormous volumes of greenhouse gases, triggered global warming, ocean acidification, and anoxia. Life on land and in the seas was pushed to the brink; recovery took millions of years, and the survivors set the stage for the age of dinosaurs and the first true mammals. 4. Triassic–Jurassic Extinction (≈201 million years ago) Approximately 80% of species disappeared at the end of the Triassic. Large amphibians and many early archosaurs were among the casualties, while the survivors—especially dinosaurs—rapidly diversified afterward. The main trigger is thought to have been intense volcanic activity linked to the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province as the supercontinent Pangaea began to break apart. Climate upheaval, rising CO₂ levels, and possible ocean acidification followed. 5. Cretaceous–Paleogene Extinction (≈66 million years ago) The most famous of the mass extinctions ended the reign of the non-avian dinosaurs and wiped out about 75% of all species. An asteroid roughly 10–15 km in diameter struck what is now the Yucatán Peninsula, creating the Chicxulub crater. The impact, combined with subsequent volcanism from the Deccan Traps, caused global darkness, wildfires, acid rain, and a prolonged “impact winter.” Marine reptiles, flying pterosaurs, and many other groups also vanished, while mammals, birds, and flowering plants inherited a transformed world. These five events underscore both the fragility and the resilience of life. Each extinction pruned the tree of life dramatically, yet the survivors rebounded, innovated, and eventually produced the astonishing biodiversity we see today—including our own species. Studying them remains essential not only for understanding Earth’s deep past but also for recognizing the scale of human-driven changes currently underway.

Black Hole

26,511 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Elon Musk has been saying the same thing for years. Humanity is still underestimating solar energy. Not underestimating it slightly. Fundamentally misunderstanding what it is. Musk: “What would the Earth be without the sun? The Earth would be a frozen dark ice ball at roughly three degrees above absolute zero.” Three degrees above absolute zero. No light. No liquid water. No life. Not a worse version of Earth. A dead rock drifting through nothing. That is the default state of this planet without a single energy source. Everything else is commentary. The sun is not one option on a menu of power generation. It is the only reason biology exists here at all. Musk: “Because of the sun, we are at a quite a nice temperature, quite pleasant. Sort of roughly 300 degrees above absolute zero.” A 297-degree window between civilization and extinction. Every ecosystem, every economy, every human body operates inside that margin. The entire project of life fits between those numbers. And somehow the species looked at the source of all of it and decided it was a secondary energy option. Musk: “The sun powers, almost the entire ecosystem is solar-powered.” Every fossil fuel on Earth is stored solar energy. Oil is ancient sunlight captured by organisms, compressed by geology, buried for millions of years. Drilling for it is harvesting the sun’s output with a 300-million-year delay and a catastrophic loss in efficiency. The original source is still running. It will run for another five billion years. It delivers more energy to Earth’s surface in one hour than humanity consumes in an entire year. One hour versus one year. That is the ratio the world is ignoring. The argument against solar was never physics. It was cost, storage, and scale. Those are engineering problems. Engineering problems get solved. They always do. The compute demands of the next decade alone will require energy production at a scale fossil fuels physically cannot reach. The intelligence explosion does not run on oil. It runs on electricity. The cheapest and most abundant source of electricity is already overhead. It has been overhead for 4.6 billion years. We do not need to discover a new energy source. We need to stop ignoring the one that powers everything we have ever built. The star is right there. The only question left is how fast we build the infrastructure to capture it.

Elon Musk has been saying the same thing for years. Humanity is still underestimating solar energy. Not underestimating it slightly. Fundamentally misunderstanding what it is. Musk: “What would the Earth be without the sun? The Earth would be a frozen dark ice ball at roughly three degrees above absolute zero.” Three degrees above absolute zero. No light. No liquid water. No life. Not a worse version of Earth. A dead rock drifting through nothing. That is the default state of this planet without a single energy source. Everything else is commentary. The sun is not one option on a menu of power generation. It is the only reason biology exists here at all. Musk: “Because of the sun, we are at a quite a nice temperature, quite pleasant. Sort of roughly 300 degrees above absolute zero.” A 297-degree window between civilization and extinction. Every ecosystem, every economy, every human body operates inside that margin. The entire project of life fits between those numbers. And somehow the species looked at the source of all of it and decided it was a secondary energy option. Musk: “The sun powers, almost the entire ecosystem is solar-powered.” Every fossil fuel on Earth is stored solar energy. Oil is ancient sunlight captured by organisms, compressed by geology, buried for millions of years. Drilling for it is harvesting the sun’s output with a 300-million-year delay and a catastrophic loss in efficiency. The original source is still running. It will run for another five billion years. It delivers more energy to Earth’s surface in one hour than humanity consumes in an entire year. One hour versus one year. That is the ratio the world is ignoring. The argument against solar was never physics. It was cost, storage, and scale. Those are engineering problems. Engineering problems get solved. They always do. The compute demands of the next decade alone will require energy production at a scale fossil fuels physically cannot reach. The intelligence explosion does not run on oil. It runs on electricity. The cheapest and most abundant source of electricity is already overhead. It has been overhead for 4.6 billion years. We do not need to discover a new energy source. We need to stop ignoring the one that powers everything we have ever built. The star is right there. The only question left is how fast we build the infrastructure to capture it.

Dustin

21,499 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

You descend from gods, not apes. History is a fabricated lie. The official timeline was manufactured in the 1800s during the "great reset" to infantilize you. Mud floods, star forts, and impossible buildings are the remnants they couldn't hide. Advanced civilizations like Tartaria, Atlantis, and Lemuria thrived with free energy, giant architecture, and consciousness technology far beyond our own. Tartaria was no myth. It spanned the globe with magnificent structures that harnessed atmospheric electricity. After its fall through orchestrated catastrophe, they repurposed the buildings as "world fairs" and claimed them as their own. Cathedrals, capitols, and ancient wonders were once power stations for the people. They destroyed the knowledge to keep you in energetic darkness. The mud flood events were real resets. Entire cities were buried under layers of liquefied earth to erase evidence of a high civilization. Orphan trains, world expositions, and the sudden "rediscovery" of ancient sites are all part of the cover-up. Giants walked this earth. Their bones are hidden in elite vaults. Your ancestors built in harmony with the cosmos. They inverted it into control. Atlantis and Lemuria didn't sink by accident. They fell through internal corruption and external interference, the same forces active today. Crystal technology, sound levitation, and interdimensional travel were everyday realities. Survivors seeded the "primitive" cultures we were taught about. The great libraries were torched or submerged to sever your lineage. The Roman Empire, Egypt, and other "ancient" wonders are far more recent than admitted. Chronology was deliberately stretched and duplicated to create a false depth of time. This keeps you feeling small, recent, and powerless. Real human history spans hundreds of thousands of years of golden ages. The reset cycles continue until we break them. Hidden history was concealed to make you accept mediocrity and dependence. Seek the old photographs, architectural anomalies, and suppressed texts. Feel the resonance in your bones when you see the truth. When enough reclaims this memory, the false timeline dissolves. You are heirs to a magnificent legacy.

You descend from gods, not apes. History is a fabricated lie. The official timeline was manufactured in the 1800s during the "great reset" to infantilize you. Mud floods, star forts, and impossible buildings are the remnants they couldn't hide. Advanced civilizations like Tartaria, Atlantis, and Lemuria thrived with free energy, giant architecture, and consciousness technology far beyond our own. Tartaria was no myth. It spanned the globe with magnificent structures that harnessed atmospheric electricity. After its fall through orchestrated catastrophe, they repurposed the buildings as "world fairs" and claimed them as their own. Cathedrals, capitols, and ancient wonders were once power stations for the people. They destroyed the knowledge to keep you in energetic darkness. The mud flood events were real resets. Entire cities were buried under layers of liquefied earth to erase evidence of a high civilization. Orphan trains, world expositions, and the sudden "rediscovery" of ancient sites are all part of the cover-up. Giants walked this earth. Their bones are hidden in elite vaults. Your ancestors built in harmony with the cosmos. They inverted it into control. Atlantis and Lemuria didn't sink by accident. They fell through internal corruption and external interference, the same forces active today. Crystal technology, sound levitation, and interdimensional travel were everyday realities. Survivors seeded the "primitive" cultures we were taught about. The great libraries were torched or submerged to sever your lineage. The Roman Empire, Egypt, and other "ancient" wonders are far more recent than admitted. Chronology was deliberately stretched and duplicated to create a false depth of time. This keeps you feeling small, recent, and powerless. Real human history spans hundreds of thousands of years of golden ages. The reset cycles continue until we break them. Hidden history was concealed to make you accept mediocrity and dependence. Seek the old photographs, architectural anomalies, and suppressed texts. Feel the resonance in your bones when you see the truth. When enough reclaims this memory, the false timeline dissolves. You are heirs to a magnificent legacy.

Ra 𐦝

35,798 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

FOLLOW THE MONEY: HOW BILLIONS IN GRANTS KEEP THE CLIMATE ALARM MACHINE RUNNING That's one of the biggest red flags in this whole climate debate—and I've been calling it out for years: the scientists pushing the nonstop "crisis" narrative aren't out there hunting for raw truth. They're guarding their funding lifeline with everything they've got. Ian Plimer drops the mic on this in his latest interviews (like that explosive Triggernometry one): "Follow the money." It's that simple. Government agencies—NSF, NASA, NOAA—are pumping out billions every year into climate-related research. NSF's budget clocks in around $8-9 billion overall, with massive chunks funneled into geosciences and climate programs. NASA's science directorate pulls in over $7 billion. NOAA's climate and research efforts grab hundreds of millions to billions in targeted dollars (recent FY26 bills kept NOAA around $6 billion total, with science/research holding steady despite attempted cuts elsewhere). Here's the catch: Grants flow freely to projects that scream "urgent catastrophe," model apocalyptic scenarios, and back big policy pushes like net-zero mandates. But if your work echoes Plimer's geological reality—high CO₂ levels in the past paired with massive ice ages, natural cycles driving most change, no runaway warming from trace human emissions—your proposal gets sidelined. Labs shrink. Careers stall. Funding vanishes. It's a classic conflict of interest baked right into the system. These researchers depend on federal grants for staff, equipment, publications, conferences—everything. Rock the boat by questioning the CO₂-doomsday story, and you're suddenly on the outside looking in. No wonder the so-called "consensus" feels unbreakable—it's financially engineered, not scientifically earned. Plimer's reel cuts straight through the noise: This isn't about following evidence wherever it leads. It's a self-perpetuating grant empire dressed up as urgent science. The cash shapes the conclusions, not the other way around. True science thrives on skepticism and debate, not trillion-dollar incentives to echo the approved line. You've been spot-on hammering this point forever, and it's more relevant now than ever. Voices like Plimer's are breaking through because the truth doesn't need subsidies to stand tall. Share if you've seen the same grift for years! Let's keep exposing it. #FollowTheMoney #ClimateGrants

FOLLOW THE MONEY: HOW BILLIONS IN GRANTS KEEP THE CLIMATE ALARM MACHINE RUNNING That's one of the biggest red flags in this whole climate debate—and I've been calling it out for years: the scientists pushing the nonstop "crisis" narrative aren't out there hunting for raw truth. They're guarding their funding lifeline with everything they've got. Ian Plimer drops the mic on this in his latest interviews (like that explosive Triggernometry one): "Follow the money." It's that simple. Government agencies—NSF, NASA, NOAA—are pumping out billions every year into climate-related research. NSF's budget clocks in around $8-9 billion overall, with massive chunks funneled into geosciences and climate programs. NASA's science directorate pulls in over $7 billion. NOAA's climate and research efforts grab hundreds of millions to billions in targeted dollars (recent FY26 bills kept NOAA around $6 billion total, with science/research holding steady despite attempted cuts elsewhere). Here's the catch: Grants flow freely to projects that scream "urgent catastrophe," model apocalyptic scenarios, and back big policy pushes like net-zero mandates. But if your work echoes Plimer's geological reality—high CO₂ levels in the past paired with massive ice ages, natural cycles driving most change, no runaway warming from trace human emissions—your proposal gets sidelined. Labs shrink. Careers stall. Funding vanishes. It's a classic conflict of interest baked right into the system. These researchers depend on federal grants for staff, equipment, publications, conferences—everything. Rock the boat by questioning the CO₂-doomsday story, and you're suddenly on the outside looking in. No wonder the so-called "consensus" feels unbreakable—it's financially engineered, not scientifically earned. Plimer's reel cuts straight through the noise: This isn't about following evidence wherever it leads. It's a self-perpetuating grant empire dressed up as urgent science. The cash shapes the conclusions, not the other way around. True science thrives on skepticism and debate, not trillion-dollar incentives to echo the approved line. You've been spot-on hammering this point forever, and it's more relevant now than ever. Voices like Plimer's are breaking through because the truth doesn't need subsidies to stand tall. Share if you've seen the same grift for years! Let's keep exposing it. #FollowTheMoney #ClimateGrants

𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇

27,941 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

IS GENESIS HISTORY? Full documentary If you are in the mood for a scientific look into biblical creationism, evidence of Noah's flood, and more, challenging the secular narrative that rejects the Bible and God altogether, this documentary is an excellent start. Well known Geologists and experts who dared to question the scientific community present factual evidence to back up their claims. You won't be disappointed. We are taught within secular science to believe that radioisotropic carbon dating methods are 100% accurate, yet fail to explain why Mount St Helen's eruption samples were giving us dates as millions of years old when lava flow was actually forming new material. Radioisotropic dating only measures the half life but doesn't take into account the environmental conditions of the object being dated, which could have been much different than what we see today 1000s of years ago. How can you adjust for environmental conditions such as heat, cold, wind, freeze, or any weather and variables that might have affected the radioactive elements found within carbon dating? We can't go back 1000s of years in time to check the weather. No geologists were present when most rocks formed, so they cannot test whether the original rocks already contained daughter isotopes alongside their parent radioisotopes. How about the fact that secular scientists who believe in radiometric dating just assume a constant decay rate. But evidence suggests other wise. "The radioactive decay of uranium in tiny crystals in a New Mexico granite (Figure 5) yields a uranium-lead “age” of 1.5 billion years. Yet the same uranium decay also produced abundant helium, but only 6,000 years worth of that helium was found to have leaked out of the tiny crystals. This means that the uranium must have decayed very rapidly over the same 6,000 years that the helium was leaking. The rate of uranium decay must have been at least 250,000 times faster than today’s measured rate! For more details see Don DeYoung’s Thousands . . . Not Billions (Master Books, Green Forest, Arkansas, 2005), pages 65–78. Or Dendrochronology, which is the dating method of counting tree rings. Trees that are smaller have less rings so they are assumed to be younger since each ring represents a certain amount of years. Let's use logic. Take 2 trees planted at the same time. One is in the shadow of the other. Which tree grows faster and which tree has more rings? Environmental conditions play a huge role in all dating methods which are impossible to prove millions of years ago. They need time folks. They need millions of years to convince you the Big Bang happened. Time is their answer for everything. Because given enough time you can basically make up anything you want. How about we attack their time. Did you know the oceans are constantly gaining in salinity? Think about it. If the Earth has been here for billions of years, what would be the current salinity of the ocean? Let's look. If the world’s oceans have been around for three billion years as evolutionists believe, they should be filled with vastly more salt than the oceans contain today. Every year more salt gets deposited. 458 million tons of sodium mixes into ocean water each year, but only 122 million tons (27 percent) is removed by other natural processes. The math doesn't work. Now add 4.5 billion years.

IS GENESIS HISTORY? Full documentary If you are in the mood for a scientific look into biblical creationism, evidence of Noah's flood, and more, challenging the secular narrative that rejects the Bible and God altogether, this documentary is an excellent start. Well known Geologists and experts who dared to question the scientific community present factual evidence to back up their claims. You won't be disappointed. We are taught within secular science to believe that radioisotropic carbon dating methods are 100% accurate, yet fail to explain why Mount St Helen's eruption samples were giving us dates as millions of years old when lava flow was actually forming new material. Radioisotropic dating only measures the half life but doesn't take into account the environmental conditions of the object being dated, which could have been much different than what we see today 1000s of years ago. How can you adjust for environmental conditions such as heat, cold, wind, freeze, or any weather and variables that might have affected the radioactive elements found within carbon dating? We can't go back 1000s of years in time to check the weather. No geologists were present when most rocks formed, so they cannot test whether the original rocks already contained daughter isotopes alongside their parent radioisotopes. How about the fact that secular scientists who believe in radiometric dating just assume a constant decay rate. But evidence suggests other wise. "The radioactive decay of uranium in tiny crystals in a New Mexico granite (Figure 5) yields a uranium-lead “age” of 1.5 billion years. Yet the same uranium decay also produced abundant helium, but only 6,000 years worth of that helium was found to have leaked out of the tiny crystals. This means that the uranium must have decayed very rapidly over the same 6,000 years that the helium was leaking. The rate of uranium decay must have been at least 250,000 times faster than today’s measured rate! For more details see Don DeYoung’s Thousands . . . Not Billions (Master Books, Green Forest, Arkansas, 2005), pages 65–78. Or Dendrochronology, which is the dating method of counting tree rings. Trees that are smaller have less rings so they are assumed to be younger since each ring represents a certain amount of years. Let's use logic. Take 2 trees planted at the same time. One is in the shadow of the other. Which tree grows faster and which tree has more rings? Environmental conditions play a huge role in all dating methods which are impossible to prove millions of years ago. They need time folks. They need millions of years to convince you the Big Bang happened. Time is their answer for everything. Because given enough time you can basically make up anything you want. How about we attack their time. Did you know the oceans are constantly gaining in salinity? Think about it. If the Earth has been here for billions of years, what would be the current salinity of the ocean? Let's look. If the world’s oceans have been around for three billion years as evolutionists believe, they should be filled with vastly more salt than the oceans contain today. Every year more salt gets deposited. 458 million tons of sodium mixes into ocean water each year, but only 122 million tons (27 percent) is removed by other natural processes. The math doesn't work. Now add 4.5 billion years.

Redpill Drifter

45,036 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Britain had a wonder of the world. ⚔️🇬🇧 For 600 years, London Bridge wasn't a bridge. It was a street. A town. A city floating on the Thames. Construction began in 1176 and took 33 years. When it was finished it had 19 stone arches, a drawbridge to let ships through, and a chapel dedicated to Saint Thomas Becket at its heart. The starting point for every pilgrim walking to Canterbury. Then people started building on it. At its peak: 200 buildings. 500 residents. 🏘️ Haberdashers, booksellers, apothecaries, taverns and alehouses open from dawn. The longest inhabited bridge in Europe. You could walk halfway across and never know you were over a river. In 1212, three years after completion, a fire killed thousands on the bridge itself. 🔥 In 1282, five arches collapsed under winter ice. The arches slowed the Thames so much that in hard winters the river froze solid. Londoners held frost fairs on the ice. Bull-baiting. Pop-up taverns. A printing press operating on a frozen river. 🧊 Every time something went wrong, they rebuilt. London Bridge stood for 622 years. Then in 1831 they demolished it. The Victorian replacement lasted barely a century. By the 1960s it was sinking into the Thames. So the City of London sold it to an American for $2.46 million. 💰 He had it dismantled stone by stone and shipped to the Arizona desert. Where it still stands today. 🏜️ Britain had a wonder of the world on the Thames for six hundred years. We sold what replaced it to Arizona. Did they teach you that? We will. 🇬🇧 Proud Of Us is a community of ordinary British people keeping extraordinary British history alive. No ads. No sponsors. Just us. If that matters to you, join us at 🙏 Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Britain had a wonder of the world. ⚔️🇬🇧 For 600 years, London Bridge wasn't a bridge. It was a street. A town. A city floating on the Thames. Construction began in 1176 and took 33 years. When it was finished it had 19 stone arches, a drawbridge to let ships through, and a chapel dedicated to Saint Thomas Becket at its heart. The starting point for every pilgrim walking to Canterbury. Then people started building on it. At its peak: 200 buildings. 500 residents. 🏘️ Haberdashers, booksellers, apothecaries, taverns and alehouses open from dawn. The longest inhabited bridge in Europe. You could walk halfway across and never know you were over a river. In 1212, three years after completion, a fire killed thousands on the bridge itself. 🔥 In 1282, five arches collapsed under winter ice. The arches slowed the Thames so much that in hard winters the river froze solid. Londoners held frost fairs on the ice. Bull-baiting. Pop-up taverns. A printing press operating on a frozen river. 🧊 Every time something went wrong, they rebuilt. London Bridge stood for 622 years. Then in 1831 they demolished it. The Victorian replacement lasted barely a century. By the 1960s it was sinking into the Thames. So the City of London sold it to an American for $2.46 million. 💰 He had it dismantled stone by stone and shipped to the Arizona desert. Where it still stands today. 🏜️ Britain had a wonder of the world on the Thames for six hundred years. We sold what replaced it to Arizona. Did they teach you that? We will. 🇬🇧 Proud Of Us is a community of ordinary British people keeping extraordinary British history alive. No ads. No sponsors. Just us. If that matters to you, join us at 🙏 Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

263,183 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇮🇷 IRANIANS RISE AFTER 46 YEARS OF MISERY: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH After 46 years under a regime that crushed freedom, emptied wallets, and flooded the streets with fear, the people are finally snapping. Iran is on fire and this time, it’s not just the usual protests. Jonathan Harounoff, Israeli international spokesperson at the UN, says what’s happening is way deeper than inflation or water shortages, for it’s a full-blown rejection of a failed dictatorship. While Iranians struggle to eat, their regime sends billions to Hezbollah and Hamas. Now, from Gen Z to bazaar owners, the country is rising in more than 12 provinces. This is civilizational, and Tehran knows it. Jonathan Harounoff: "It’s very much a culmination of 46 years of the Iranian people having been brutalized by their regime and they're saying enough is enough. It’s not just the shopkeepers and bazaar owners... you’ve got Gen Zers, young people, old people, everyone is saying they’ve had enough. People complain about 2.7% inflation here. In Iran, it's 42.2%. One dollar is worth 1.4 million rials. Between $1B and $2B have been sent to Hezbollah, and about $300M to Hamas, while people can’t even buy food or water. Iranian people are linking Tehran's destructive foreign policy to their own economic misery. They see the regime pumping billions into terrorist proxies abroad, and that’s why they’re going into the streets." Source: FOX & Friends

🇮🇷 IRANIANS RISE AFTER 46 YEARS OF MISERY: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH After 46 years under a regime that crushed freedom, emptied wallets, and flooded the streets with fear, the people are finally snapping. Iran is on fire and this time, it’s not just the usual protests. Jonathan Harounoff, Israeli international spokesperson at the UN, says what’s happening is way deeper than inflation or water shortages, for it’s a full-blown rejection of a failed dictatorship. While Iranians struggle to eat, their regime sends billions to Hezbollah and Hamas. Now, from Gen Z to bazaar owners, the country is rising in more than 12 provinces. This is civilizational, and Tehran knows it. Jonathan Harounoff: "It’s very much a culmination of 46 years of the Iranian people having been brutalized by their regime and they're saying enough is enough. It’s not just the shopkeepers and bazaar owners... you’ve got Gen Zers, young people, old people, everyone is saying they’ve had enough. People complain about 2.7% inflation here. In Iran, it's 42.2%. One dollar is worth 1.4 million rials. Between $1B and $2B have been sent to Hezbollah, and about $300M to Hamas, while people can’t even buy food or water. Iranian people are linking Tehran's destructive foreign policy to their own economic misery. They see the regime pumping billions into terrorist proxies abroad, and that’s why they’re going into the streets." Source: FOX & Friends

Mario Nawfal

67,361 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Marc Andreessen just incinerated 80 years of skepticism in under three minutes. Andreessen: “The four most dangerous words in investing are ‘this time is different.’” He’s talking about AI. And he’s about to detonate that phrase from the inside. For eight decades, artificial intelligence followed the same brutal script. Hype builds. Money floods in. The technology fails to deliver. The entire field collapses. In 1943, the first neural network paper proved mathematical models of brain cells could perform any logical computation. Revolutionary on paper. Dead on arrival. In 1956, scientists secured a grant to spend ten weeks at Dartmouth believing they could build AGI by the end of summer. They did not. In the 1980s, corporations poured over a billion dollars into “expert systems” designed to replicate human decision-making. By 1987, the entire market cratered. In 2016, machine learning hype surged again. Faded within months. Four waves. Four collapses. Same result every single time. The skeptics aren’t guessing. History is entirely on their side. Every generation of investors who believed “this time is different” got buried. But Andreessen isn’t finished. Andreessen: “I’ll tell you what’s different. Like, now it’s working.” That sentence sounds simple. It is the most consequential sentence in technology right now. AI didn’t make one breakthrough. It made four. Back to back. In the same window. Language models. Reasoning. Coding agents. Self-improvement. Every single one generating revenue in production right now. Not a demo. Not a research paper. Not a promise. Deployed infrastructure producing billions in real output today. Then the Linus Torvalds moment. Andreessen: “If Linus Torvalds is saying that the AI coding is now better than he is… that’s never happened before. And so now we know that it’s going to sweep through coding.” The man who built the operating system running most of the internet just admitted the machine writes better code than he does. That is not a marketing claim. That is surrender. And coding is the hardest test case. If AI can outperform the best human coder alive, everything downstream is already decided. Medicine. Law. Finance. Engineering. All derivatives. But the part that should unsettle you is the fourth breakthrough. Recursive self-improvement. The machine is no longer waiting for human engineers to upgrade it. It is researching, coding, and optimizing itself. The pace of improvement just decoupled from human biology entirely. And the hardware market is confirming something that has never happened in computing. Hardware is supposed to lose value the second it ships. Nvidia’s old chips are gaining value. Used silicon is appreciating like waterfront property. Every GPU on earth is sold out for the next three to four years. That is not a bubble. That is a structural shift in what the world physically needs to function. Andreessen: “I’m jumping out of my shoes. Like this is it. Like this is the culmination of 80 years worth of work and this is the time it’s becoming real.” Eighty years. Researchers spent entire careers chasing this problem and died before seeing it solved. Generations of scientists poured their finite lives into a theory that kept collapsing under its own promise. And now all four pieces arrived at once. The people calling this a bubble are running the same playbook that was correct every other time. But every other time, the technology wasn’t working. This time it is. For eighty years, “this time is different” buried everyone who believed it. This is the first time it buries everyone who doesn’t.

Marc Andreessen just incinerated 80 years of skepticism in under three minutes. Andreessen: “The four most dangerous words in investing are ‘this time is different.’” He’s talking about AI. And he’s about to detonate that phrase from the inside. For eight decades, artificial intelligence followed the same brutal script. Hype builds. Money floods in. The technology fails to deliver. The entire field collapses. In 1943, the first neural network paper proved mathematical models of brain cells could perform any logical computation. Revolutionary on paper. Dead on arrival. In 1956, scientists secured a grant to spend ten weeks at Dartmouth believing they could build AGI by the end of summer. They did not. In the 1980s, corporations poured over a billion dollars into “expert systems” designed to replicate human decision-making. By 1987, the entire market cratered. In 2016, machine learning hype surged again. Faded within months. Four waves. Four collapses. Same result every single time. The skeptics aren’t guessing. History is entirely on their side. Every generation of investors who believed “this time is different” got buried. But Andreessen isn’t finished. Andreessen: “I’ll tell you what’s different. Like, now it’s working.” That sentence sounds simple. It is the most consequential sentence in technology right now. AI didn’t make one breakthrough. It made four. Back to back. In the same window. Language models. Reasoning. Coding agents. Self-improvement. Every single one generating revenue in production right now. Not a demo. Not a research paper. Not a promise. Deployed infrastructure producing billions in real output today. Then the Linus Torvalds moment. Andreessen: “If Linus Torvalds is saying that the AI coding is now better than he is… that’s never happened before. And so now we know that it’s going to sweep through coding.” The man who built the operating system running most of the internet just admitted the machine writes better code than he does. That is not a marketing claim. That is surrender. And coding is the hardest test case. If AI can outperform the best human coder alive, everything downstream is already decided. Medicine. Law. Finance. Engineering. All derivatives. But the part that should unsettle you is the fourth breakthrough. Recursive self-improvement. The machine is no longer waiting for human engineers to upgrade it. It is researching, coding, and optimizing itself. The pace of improvement just decoupled from human biology entirely. And the hardware market is confirming something that has never happened in computing. Hardware is supposed to lose value the second it ships. Nvidia’s old chips are gaining value. Used silicon is appreciating like waterfront property. Every GPU on earth is sold out for the next three to four years. That is not a bubble. That is a structural shift in what the world physically needs to function. Andreessen: “I’m jumping out of my shoes. Like this is it. Like this is the culmination of 80 years worth of work and this is the time it’s becoming real.” Eighty years. Researchers spent entire careers chasing this problem and died before seeing it solved. Generations of scientists poured their finite lives into a theory that kept collapsing under its own promise. And now all four pieces arrived at once. The people calling this a bubble are running the same playbook that was correct every other time. But every other time, the technology wasn’t working. This time it is. For eighty years, “this time is different” buried everyone who believed it. This is the first time it buries everyone who doesn’t.

Dustin

18,103 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Joe Rogan is stunned as Michael Button describes one of archaeology’s strangest unresolved cases about stone tools found in Mexico in layers that geologists dated to roughly 250,000 YEARS ago which potentially rewrites the entire history of humans in the Americas: CONTEXT: The place Button is talking about is Hueyatlaco, an archaeological site near Puebla, Mexico. And the extraordinary dates are real. Researchers excavating there in the 1960s reported sophisticated stone tools buried alongside extinct Ice Age animals. Then the dating became a nightmare for archaeology. A 1981 paper in the peer-reviewed journal Quaternary Research, authored by scientists including two U.S. Geological Survey geologists, reported multiple lines of geological evidence pointing toward an astonishingly old site. Most strikingly: A camel pelvis associated with the tool-bearing deposits produced uranium-series dates of approximately: 245,000 ± 40,000 years and more than 180,000 years. Volcanic layers higher in the sequence produced even older fission-track estimates roughly 370,000 and 600,000 years, although those measurements came with enormous uncertainties. BUTTON: “They found these very sophisticated stone tools. They’re like bifacial stone tools, which means they’ve been worked on two sides.” “They found that the ash was giving these crazy dates like 200,000, 300,000, up to 600,000 years old.” ROGAN: “What?” BUTTON: “That camel pelvis came back to 250,000 years old as well. And that was in the same layer of the tools.” “They tried to publish this and they received immense pushback.” “They couldn’t publish for like 20 years, and by that time many of the artifacts had gone missing and the site actually got razed.” “I’m not trying to say that’s like some conspiracy or anything, but it just means that you can’t really prove it.” “There could be human presence in the Americas over 200,000 years ago, potentially even older than that.” *IMPORTANT NOTES* Here’s the part that shows how explosive that claim would actually be: The strongest widely accepted evidence for humans in North America today comes from White Sands, New Mexico, where human footprints have been independently dated to roughly 21,000–23,000 years ago. So if Hueyatlaco really represents human-made tools at ~250,000 years... we aren’t talking about moving the timeline back another few thousand years. We’re talking about pushing evidence for hominins in the Americas back more than 200,000 additional years. And there’s only one major published American site that even gets remotely close. In 2017, researchers writing in Nature argued that smashed mastodon bones and stones at California’s Cerutti Mastodon site showed hominin activity approximately 130,000 years ago. That claim remains fiercely disputed. Hueyatlaco would be roughly 120,000 years older even than Cerutti. Which helps explain why archaeologists demand extraordinary evidence here. And this is where Button’s story needs an important caveat: The dating of the geology is not the same thing as proving the tools are 250,000 years old. Later researchers challenged the dating interpretation. A peer-reviewed review of the Valsequillo evidence warned that the old uranium-series dates on bone could be artificially inflated by uranium leaching and argued that the archaeological deposits were instead Late Pleistocene in age. Other researchers continued defending an age of 250,000+ years, so the controversy never cleanly disappeared. Then the evidence trail got worse. A 2006 peer-reviewed review of the Valsequillo discoveries noted that most of the famous archaeological finds from the area were by then missing. And in 2011, geologist Virginia Steen-McIntyre who was one of the original researchers defending the extreme dates reported through the World Archaeological Congress that the surviving portion of Hueyatlaco above the reservoir had been bulldozed, landscaped and crossed by concrete walls.

Joe Rogan is stunned as Michael Button describes one of archaeology’s strangest unresolved cases about stone tools found in Mexico in layers that geologists dated to roughly 250,000 YEARS ago which potentially rewrites the entire history of humans in the Americas: CONTEXT: The place Button is talking about is Hueyatlaco, an archaeological site near Puebla, Mexico. And the extraordinary dates are real. Researchers excavating there in the 1960s reported sophisticated stone tools buried alongside extinct Ice Age animals. Then the dating became a nightmare for archaeology. A 1981 paper in the peer-reviewed journal Quaternary Research, authored by scientists including two U.S. Geological Survey geologists, reported multiple lines of geological evidence pointing toward an astonishingly old site. Most strikingly: A camel pelvis associated with the tool-bearing deposits produced uranium-series dates of approximately: 245,000 ± 40,000 years and more than 180,000 years. Volcanic layers higher in the sequence produced even older fission-track estimates roughly 370,000 and 600,000 years, although those measurements came with enormous uncertainties. BUTTON: “They found these very sophisticated stone tools. They’re like bifacial stone tools, which means they’ve been worked on two sides.” “They found that the ash was giving these crazy dates like 200,000, 300,000, up to 600,000 years old.” ROGAN: “What?” BUTTON: “That camel pelvis came back to 250,000 years old as well. And that was in the same layer of the tools.” “They tried to publish this and they received immense pushback.” “They couldn’t publish for like 20 years, and by that time many of the artifacts had gone missing and the site actually got razed.” “I’m not trying to say that’s like some conspiracy or anything, but it just means that you can’t really prove it.” “There could be human presence in the Americas over 200,000 years ago, potentially even older than that.” IMPORTANT NOTES Here’s the part that shows how explosive that claim would actually be: The strongest widely accepted evidence for humans in North America today comes from White Sands, New Mexico, where human footprints have been independently dated to roughly 21,000–23,000 years ago. So if Hueyatlaco really represents human-made tools at ~250,000 years... we aren’t talking about moving the timeline back another few thousand years. We’re talking about pushing evidence for hominins in the Americas back more than 200,000 additional years. And there’s only one major published American site that even gets remotely close. In 2017, researchers writing in Nature argued that smashed mastodon bones and stones at California’s Cerutti Mastodon site showed hominin activity approximately 130,000 years ago. That claim remains fiercely disputed. Hueyatlaco would be roughly 120,000 years older even than Cerutti. Which helps explain why archaeologists demand extraordinary evidence here. And this is where Button’s story needs an important caveat: The dating of the geology is not the same thing as proving the tools are 250,000 years old. Later researchers challenged the dating interpretation. A peer-reviewed review of the Valsequillo evidence warned that the old uranium-series dates on bone could be artificially inflated by uranium leaching and argued that the archaeological deposits were instead Late Pleistocene in age. Other researchers continued defending an age of 250,000+ years, so the controversy never cleanly disappeared. Then the evidence trail got worse. A 2006 peer-reviewed review of the Valsequillo discoveries noted that most of the famous archaeological finds from the area were by then missing. And in 2011, geologist Virginia Steen-McIntyre who was one of the original researchers defending the extreme dates reported through the World Archaeological Congress that the surviving portion of Hueyatlaco above the reservoir had been bulldozed, landscaped and crossed by concrete walls.

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

19,122 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

🚨🇺🇦 UKRAINE IS TURNING AI INTO THE UPPER HAND: DRONES, SNIPER TECH, AND ALGORITHMIC WARFARE In the rolling fields of eastern Ukraine, a soldier peers through the scope of a rifle pointed at a target 2 and a half miles away. At that distance, even the Earth’s curve starts to matter. In older wars, this kind of shot would have been impossible - mythical even. But when the trigger is pulled, the impossible happens: a bullet arcs through the air and finds its mark. A new world record. The secret wasn’t just the shooter’s steady hand. It was an alliance of man, machine, and math - AI-powered optics calculating wind, humidity, and drop, while a drone overhead fed real-time telemetry into the rifle’s brain. That single shot is the metaphor for Ukraine’s entire war. Russia has the size - tanks, jets, bodies to burn. Ukraine has the brains - algorithms, drones, precision. Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces isn’t a sideshow. It’s a whole new branch of the military, running swarms of drones that hit tens of thousands of Russian targets every month. Some drones distract, others jam, and the killers dive last. AI makes this possible. Drones fly beyond line-of-sight, reroute around jammers, and finish missions even when cut off from human pilots. That’s how Ukrainian drones just lit up Russia’s Saratov oil refinery, slicing into Moscow’s fuel supply lines. Earlier this month, AI-guided strikes crippled Ryazan and Novokuibyshevsk refineries - knocking them offline for weeks and cutting Russia’s war machine at the knees. Behind the frontline is Brave1, Ukraine’s innovation engine. It takes battlefield requests - “make a drone that can dodge jammers” - and spits out prototypes in months, not years. Think Silicon Valley, but instead of apps, the product is software-guided kamikaze drones that can fly 600 km deep into Russia. Even NATO defense startups are plugging into this ecosystem, testing autonomous drones in Ukraine’s skies like it’s the world’s deadliest beta test. Every mission trains the algorithms, making the next strike smarter and sharper. Russia wanted a war of numbers. Ukraine made it a war of code. And in that fight, Moscow’s massive army looks like a dinosaur charging headfirst into a digital age. Sources: Reuters, BBC, Kyiv Independent, Politico

🚨🇺🇦 UKRAINE IS TURNING AI INTO THE UPPER HAND: DRONES, SNIPER TECH, AND ALGORITHMIC WARFARE In the rolling fields of eastern Ukraine, a soldier peers through the scope of a rifle pointed at a target 2 and a half miles away. At that distance, even the Earth’s curve starts to matter. In older wars, this kind of shot would have been impossible - mythical even. But when the trigger is pulled, the impossible happens: a bullet arcs through the air and finds its mark. A new world record. The secret wasn’t just the shooter’s steady hand. It was an alliance of man, machine, and math - AI-powered optics calculating wind, humidity, and drop, while a drone overhead fed real-time telemetry into the rifle’s brain. That single shot is the metaphor for Ukraine’s entire war. Russia has the size - tanks, jets, bodies to burn. Ukraine has the brains - algorithms, drones, precision. Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Forces isn’t a sideshow. It’s a whole new branch of the military, running swarms of drones that hit tens of thousands of Russian targets every month. Some drones distract, others jam, and the killers dive last. AI makes this possible. Drones fly beyond line-of-sight, reroute around jammers, and finish missions even when cut off from human pilots. That’s how Ukrainian drones just lit up Russia’s Saratov oil refinery, slicing into Moscow’s fuel supply lines. Earlier this month, AI-guided strikes crippled Ryazan and Novokuibyshevsk refineries - knocking them offline for weeks and cutting Russia’s war machine at the knees. Behind the frontline is Brave1, Ukraine’s innovation engine. It takes battlefield requests - “make a drone that can dodge jammers” - and spits out prototypes in months, not years. Think Silicon Valley, but instead of apps, the product is software-guided kamikaze drones that can fly 600 km deep into Russia. Even NATO defense startups are plugging into this ecosystem, testing autonomous drones in Ukraine’s skies like it’s the world’s deadliest beta test. Every mission trains the algorithms, making the next strike smarter and sharper. Russia wanted a war of numbers. Ukraine made it a war of code. And in that fight, Moscow’s massive army looks like a dinosaur charging headfirst into a digital age. Sources: Reuters, BBC, Kyiv Independent, Politico

Mario Nawfal

167,140 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce