Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

ICE agent waves gun around while blocking truck—points it directly at driver's head. "I'll shoot you!" agent yells pointing gun through windshield at driver for several seconds. Another agent drags away woman screaming, "What are you doing!?" LAPD just stood by and watched it happen. Is this proper law...

98,117 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨BREAKING: DHS is trying to argue that the ICE agent, who drove illegally down the shoulder of a highway and pointing a gun at innocent U.S. citizens, was just “performing his official duties.” And that prosecuting him is “nothing more than a political stunt.” According to prosecutors, this wasn’t some active takedown, or dangerous suspect situation. It was rush hour traffic. The agent allegedly chose to drive down the highway shoulder to get around it, and when a civilian vehicle got in his way… he pointed a GUN at the people inside. And DHS’s response is… you can’t prosecute him because he’s an ICE agent, and he was doing his job. So now we’re supposed to believe that illegally using the shoulder of a state highway, and pointing a GUN at random U.S. citizens, is just… a standard ICE procedure? The law is actually pretty clear on when officers can point a weapon at someone… it’s tied to an objectively reasonable belief of an immediate threat, or the need to prevent serious harm during a lawful enforcement action. It is not a free for all to use force because someone is in your way on the highway. And that’s exactly why DHS defending this is so dangerous. If “official duties” becomes a blanket excuse for this kind of behavior, then the standard shifts from what the law allows… to whatever a federal agent says was necessary in the moment. And once you do that, accountability disappears… and so do your rights.

Jesus Freakin Congress

54,145 просмотров • 23 дней назад

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent pulled a gun on an unarmed man, who was running AWAY from him… into an apartment complex… in Austin, Texas. This morning agents tried to stop two men, who then ran. In the video, an agent couldn’t catch one man, so he pulls his gun and points it at another unarmed man, while chasing him through a residential area. That is not normal. Pointing a firearm at someone is a use of force. And courts have been very clear… you don’t get to threaten lethal force just because someone ran from you. Running is not an imminent deadly threat. And this wasn’t an empty field. This was an apartment complex… where innocent people, including children, could have been in the line of fire because an agent decided to escalate a nonviolent situation. The agent then tells the man to get on the ground, which he does… and as the man is lying there unarmed, complying, the agent still has his gun pointed at him. Only after another agent says, “I got it, I got it,” does he finally holster his weapon. So, let’s be honest about what we’re watching… This is what poorly trained agents look like when they believe there are no consequences. This is what happens when escalation is normalized, and drawing a weapon becomes instinct instead of a last resort. An agent couldn’t catch someone… so he pulled a gun. A pattern we keep seeing. And every time it starts the same way, someone running away. Running away is not a capital offense. It does not justify threatening lethal force in a residential area, full of families. It does not justify pointing a firearm at an unarmed person, especially when on the ground. When agents feel empowered to escalate situations like this, it signals something bigger than one incident... It signals a culture that believes badges override constitutional rights. Threatening deadly force, when there is no immediate threat, is illegal. And it has to stop. Because the next time an agent “can’t catch” someone, we already know how the story can end.

Jesus Freakin Congress

46,889 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇸‼️🚨 DEEP 3-ANGLE ANALYSIS SHOWS AGENT IS TO BLAME: By now we have enough information to understand what happened. Multiple bad decisions led to Pretti’s killing. 1️⃣ WHO IS TO BLAME FOR THE SHOTS: The agent in the grey jacket caused the shooting and is responsible for Pretti’s death. 1) The agent took the gun from Pretti 2) He screamed “GUN” 3) Everyone thought Pretti had a gun, which was wrong. He should have said “I GOT HIS GUN” 4) He accidentally discharged Pretti’s gun. This fits with the claim that a bullet impacted the pavement near Pretti’s front. 5) The agent failed to communicate the misfire 6) Other agents thought Pretti had a gun and heard shots 7) Other agents shot Pretti in what they perceived as self-defence 8) The agents tried to find the gun but couldn’t. This shows they genuinely believed he fired first. → The grey-jacket agent acted irresponsibly and failed to communicate with his colleagues. He caused the deadly confusion. 2️⃣ WHO IS TO BLAME FOR THE ESCALATION: The agents were fighting with the female protesters and started pushing them. It does not look like they gave proper orders, checked IDs or followed any procedure. It just looks like they were annoyed and wanted to shut them up. This seems unnecessary — more like angry, aggressive behaviour. Pretti got caught up in it, clearly visible in the video. He was in the wrong place at the wrong time. 3️⃣ SHOULD YOU CARRY A GUN TO PROTESTS? Carrying a gun to protests is dangerous. It is legal, and Pretti did not confront the agents or act aggressively. He actually moved away when things got tense. Yet this gun was the cause of his death. It’s probably safer to leave it at home, since you won’t shoot an agent in self-defence anyway. It can only cause trouble. Nevertheless, it was legal for Pretti to carry the gun.

Lord Bebo

130,799 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад