If AI could disrupt half the workforce, we can’t wait until people lose their jobs to act. The companies profiting from AI should help cushion the disruption. That starts with taxing the data centers powering it.

Liz, I can't help but notice that everything you say is stupid...

If Henry Ford had been forced to bail out every buggy-whip manufacturer before selling a Model T, we’d still be riding horses. Innovation creates new industries, new jobs, and new opportunities. That’s how progress works.

Every technological revolution disrupts jobs. Warren's solution isn't to help people adapt. It's to find a successful industry, stir up fear, and justify higher taxes. And she wouldn't stop AI. She'd just make it more expensive for the people who need it most. The wealthy, large corporations, and governments will still have access. The people priced out are workers, students, startups, and small businesses trying to use AI to get ahead. If this logic had existed a century ago, she'd have proposed a tractor tax, a computer tax, and an internet tax too. Fear of change becomes the excuse for making opportunity less accessible.

Tax, tax, tax, tax. We're tired of losing money to your corrupt NGO's. The jig is up.

This is all you've got...🥱

Liz, start fixing crap like this and then maybe we will be able to hear you!!

The democrats' answer to everything is to confiscate more of someone else's money and do nothing with it, but line their own pockets

Elizabeth Warren's solution to every problem is the same. Tax it. Company doing well? Tax it. Technology advancing? Tax it. At some point, you'd think she'd try something else. 😏🇺🇸

Shut the fuck up you dumb bitch

How much have you profited from Pfizer?

THE GOLD STANDARD is let the free market determine who wins and fails here

Tax tax tax tax tax tax tax. Man I can't stand your ass. Spend less.

"Tax the data centers" is not a workforce strategy. It's a talking point. If you actually care about workers navigating the AI transition, talk about skills training, education reform, and economic growth. Punishing innovation helps nobody except our competitors.

If taxes went to helping people maybe but let’s face, it’s going to quality leering instead.

Taxing the data centers does nothing when the taxes go into government pockets and get diverted to idiotic plans. This is a government and econicm structural issue you people should be fixing instead you are here grandstanding like you need more tax money to do what you need to do. You do not without starting. Stop feeding people lies and bullshit.

The government is not getting any more of our money to waste or even worse give to illegal Somolians.

How about you CUT taxes you evil witch!!!!

Some form of tax is more logical than stealing half of these companies and making them worthless.

Let’s replace democratic senators and congressmen with AI. Oh but wait, no intelligence needed, just amateur acting skills.

How about using AI to increase government efficiency and reduce the taxpayer burden of running the country? Maybe even work with ai experts to review the budget & find some redundancy to remove or cost efficiencies? Give it a try. Or create a job for me to do for you.

Stop trying to control everything, Dizzy Lizzy. This is no concern of government. It's called private enterprise, of which you're clueless You far-left clowns screw up everything you touch, so just butt out!

If Elizabeth Warren can get millions in kickbacks from Big Pharma, she can pay for half of the country's health insurance.

As the planet transitions to automation, there is an obvious opportunity in management of the process. You just want to manage it. You’re not stupid, but you’re not so smart either.

If you have "Democrat Senator" on your resume you're really only qualified for HR roles

The thing and one should be thinking about it letting GOVERNMENT extort us anymore than they already are. Commie scum

Sen. Warren, your AI data-center tax is economic malpractice in a compassion costume. AI isn’t killing jobs - it’s a massive net creator, lifting blue-collar wages, exploding GDP, and locking in America’s lead. Taxing the infrastructure behind that boom just slows innovation, spikes costs, and hands the future to China. This isn’t “proactive government.” It’s textbook socialism: punish the builders, redistribute the scraps, and make everyone poorer. And why obsess over new revenue for your pet causes when you block every real effort to cut the waste, fraud, and abuse already drowning our programs? Plug the leaks before demanding more water from the golden goose. Let AI flourish under lean rules. Markets allocate the gains. That’s the proven American path - not your failed redistribution fantasy.

If you went after the FRAUD and eliminated it, you'd have more than enough money to fund literally everything you guys have promised for decades.

Think about it. She has been saying the same thing for decades about other technology innovations. Her answer is always to regulate and tax the heck out of them. How about we help people learn new skills with AI so they can keep their jobs or enter the marketplace with the latest skills they need to compete?

We sure as shit don’t need you, Elizabeth! I’d rather have an AI.

And how will taxing actually help with the problems you are describing? You take more money from corporations, so they hire less people, so you need to spend more money on welfare?

Instead of just taking the money through taxation, why not engage those corporations to directly organize and sponsor alternative job training to skill up the labor force for those with a high probability of job loss?

Assumes facts not in evidence. Where is the evidence that half the workforce will lose their jobs?

Well if I were going to build a data center I would buy an island outside of US jurisdiction and use satellite to serve the demand. You will cost us billions in jobs and infrastructure because of your hunger for power. There is not enough printed money to satiate Democrats.

It will not happen overnight. It will happen far more slowly than your limited intelligence can imagine. In fact, it is probably not going to happen any faster than the rate at which people leave the work force through retirement. Stop immigration, and you solve two problems at the same time.