Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

If an AI lab is kicking off an intelligence explosion, would it be in their interest to tell the President or not? Scott Alexander and Daniel Kokotajlo think yes. "We made the guess that early in 2027, the [leading AI] company would deliberately wake up the president. Strategically, [not...

53,186 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patelvor 1 Jahr

Transcript: Apple Podcasts: Spotify: YouTube:

Profilbild von The Information
The Informationvor 1 Jahr

Meta AI researchers are fretting over the threat of Chinese AI, whose quality caught American firms, including OpenAI, by surprise.

Profilbild von Eliezer Yudkowsky ⏹️
Eliezer Yudkowsky ⏹️vor 1 Jahr

@slatestarcodex @DKokotajlo All of this lives in the imaginary world where a powerful AGI trained mostly on human prediction is *not* advising on how to manipulate the President, nor manipulating its own "owners". Normies react skeptically to that prediction so it gets left out of scenarios.

Profilbild von Johannes Miertschischk
Johannes Miertschischkvor 1 Jahr

@slatestarcodex @DKokotajlo You could have saved yourself the time❗️ The brilliant American engineer Suchir Balaji (major contributor to ChatGPT), who was murdered in his San Francisco apartment on November 22, 2024, explains in his final, unfinished essay why LLMs can never achieve AGI.

Profilbild von Venu Vasudevan
Venu Vasudevanvor 1 Jahr

@slatestarcodex @DKokotajlo À Positively double negative argument

Profilbild von Hermopolis Prime 🇳🇿
Hermopolis Prime 🇳🇿vor 1 Jahr

@slatestarcodex @DKokotajlo Brick wall background again... 🤔

Profilbild von James
Jamesvor 1 Jahr

@slatestarcodex @DKokotajlo Which president :)

Profilbild von Parzival
Parzivalvor 1 Jahr

@slatestarcodex @DKokotajlo and they will not know how or what exactly the AI is doing... but it gets the job done. the takeover will be gradual then sudden.

Ähnliche Videos

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The founders of Stripe and Pinterest on how to convince people to join your startup Stripe CEO Patrick Collison argues that part of the reason startups resonate so much is because the outcome is not guaranteed: "If it were guaranteed, it would be boring... Whether or not you're the best person in the world at what you do, you're probably not going to alter Google's trajectory. But if you really want to benchmark yourself and see how much of a contribution and impact you can make--which is a really compelling prospect for a lot of the best people--a startup is a much better place to test that." Pinterest founder Ben Silbermann emphasized this as well: "No smart person that you're hiring is under the illusion that you have a crystal ball into the future and that joining is a guaranteed thing. In fact, if you're telling them that and they select in, you shouldn't hire them because they didn't pass a basic intelligence test. I think it's important to tell them what's exciting and where you think the company can go. But also tell them where it will be hard and chart your best plan. And then tell them why their role can be instrumental--because it will be... What I would discourage doing is whitewashing all of that. If people are joining your company because they want all of the certainty and safety of working at Google but also the perks of working at a small startup with lots of responsibility and transparency, that's a really negative sign." Apparently in the early days of PayPal, Peter Thiel and Max Levchin would tell people after they interviewed all the reasons that the company would fail: "Visa and MasterCard want to kill us. We also might be doing something that's illegal. But if we succeed, we'll redefine payments." Don't whitewash the risks. Instead tell them how your startup will change the world if you succeed and how their role will be instrumental in affecting that change. Video source: Y Combinator (2014)

Startup Archive

11,811 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten