Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

If approved, Constitution pipeline would deliver desperately needed natural gas from Pennsylvania into New England, lowering energy costs for millions of Americans. It’s a no-brainer project that would make life more affordable for New Englanders. President Trump and the National Energy Dominance Council have made tremendous progress getting pipelines...

81,460 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Reporter: “The two highest places to buy gas in the country? New York City and Boston. The problem is, the blue states will not allow the gas to travel, to produce electricity or to reach customers… When will consumers in the Northeast feel relief from President Trump’s energy policies? And what can he do about state objections to expansion of infrastructure? Then have a quick follow up.” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt: “Unfortunately, because of the Democrat policies in the area, from the federal government’s perspective, the President and the National Energy Dominance Council, Secretaries Wright and Burgum are doing all we can when it comes to federal permitting. The drill, baby, drill agenda is obviously underway.” “The President has made a huge push for more fossil fuels in this country. You look at what he did last week with respect to coal. Coal truly keeps the lights on in this country. We learned that in the recent winter storms, however, there’s only so much that can be done at the federal level. That’s why the President has called on blue state governors to participate in this energy dominance agenda, including governors in New England in the northeast, by contacting Governor Hochul directly to get this Constitution pipeline underway.” “This is not only going to bring down the cost of energy in the northeast, it’s also going to support job growth and to support job growth and energy affordability and more opportunity for workers in the Northeast. And I just have a quick statistic here on energy that I found fascinating. And it’s obviously true because I’m saying it up here. Red states with Republican legislatures currently enjoy lower average retail electricity prices than blue states with Democrat legislatures. And that’s exactly why the President is calling on all blue state governors across New England and the northeast to get on board. Let’s bring prices down for all Americans, whether they live in a red or a blue state.”

RedWave Press

179,066 views • 6 months ago

Wow! Talk about WASTE, FRAUD, AND ABUSE! 🚨The board of Directors for the Export-Import Bank of the United States is having a meeting on Thursday, 3/13/25 to vote on whether they will approve nearly $5 BILLION in US taxpayer dollars to be sent overseas to AFRICA to fund an LNG Energy project in competition with the Trump prioritized LNG project in Alaska!!🚨 France’s largest energy company, Total Energies TotalEnergies, is pursuing $5 billion of American taxpayer funds from the U.S. Export-Import Bank for its Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) project located in Mozambique, a third world country in East Africa that is plagued by Islamic terrorism and massive electoral unrest. This project will directly compete with the LNG Industry in the U.S., especially Alaska LNG which is a TOP Energy priority from President Trump. The US is the largest LNG exporter in the world. On January 20th, 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed an executive order titled UNLEASHING ALASKA’S EXTRAORDINARY RESOURCE POTENTIAL, in which he said he was ordering the US to “prioritize the development of Alaska’s LNG potential, including the permitting of all necessary pipeline and export infrastructure related to the Alaska LNG Project, giving due consideration to the economic and national security benefits associated with such development.” Instead of supporting President Trump's domestic energy dominance agenda, the ExIm Bank U.S. Export-Import Bank is sending our tax dollars to foreign competitors. In practice, the ExIm Bank finances investments by big businesses that primarily benefit foreign companies and governments, much like USAID. U.S. taxpayer dollars should NOT fund a foreign-based and foreign-owned energy project that would be a direct competition with American energy producers, sending the economic wealth from those projects overseas. We can’t allow for $5 BILLION of our US tax dollars to be used to fund the LNG project in Mozambique. Let’s invest into US based LNG projects. No more America Last energy polices! AMERICA FIRST! Donald J. Trump Elon Musk Secretary Doug Burgum Chris Wright JD Vance

Laura Loomer

515,139 views • 1 year ago

We believe that there’s no future without nuclear energy. We support the goal of tripling nuclear energy capacity by 2050 to get to net-zero emissions. However, we can’t achieve this goal without addressing these two things: 1 - 𝗔𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲-𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀: Over and over again we’ve witnessed a troubling pattern: when nuclear power plants are shut down, they’re replaced by fossil fuels. This transition not only makes governments more reliant on polluting energy imports, but also makes it lot harder to reduce our greenhouse gas emission. Given the urgency of the climate and energy crisis we face today, both of these outcomes are unacceptable. For these reasons we strongly condemn nuclear energy phase-outs and instead advocate for countries to extend the life of their existing nuclear reactors. By doing so, nations can decrease their dependence on fossil fuels, maintain a more sustainable energy mix, and make substantial progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 2 - 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: The WorldBank extends grants for low and middle-income countries to fund various initiatives, including clean energy projects. The last time it approved a nuclear energy project was six decades ago. Since then, the World Bank and other multilateral development banks have completely stopped supporting nuclear power. Not only do they refuse to provide financial support, they also refrain from offering any strategic planning guidance to countries looking to build nuclear power plants. It’s a de facto ban on nuclear energy, since these projects tend to be expensive and beyond the means of low to middle-income countries. We urge the World Bank and other similar financing institutions to update their stance on this matter and hire the necessary staff to assess nuclear energy projects. Me, Stand Up for Nuclear and WePlanet joined forces ahead of the first every nuclear energy summit held in Brussels, to make our voices heard through art. We’re ready to turn the world Inside Out and step into our clean energy future! Let’s go ⚡️ Learn more at:

isabelle 🪐

109,438 views • 2 years ago