Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

“If bombing the Iranians was going to solve the problem, the problem would have been solved by now. We know for a fact that just bombing them is not going to solve the problem and we haven’t heard any alternative from the president about what he’s going to do... to get us out of this war, which has already cost a lot of American lives and treasure.” “Trump bluffed. They called his bluff and now he’s stuck. And all of his threats are falling on deaf ears and he’s getting frustrated. And we have to start to entertain the possibility that Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff don’t know what they’re doing. Because they got us into this. They have no way to get us out. And we either have to double down or go home and neither of those is a really good option.”show more

Josh Rogin

258,878 subscribers

66,599 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“Trump was bluffing. They called his bluff. And he backed down. And you can say that he was doing this to soothe the markets. Another way to say that is that he’s doing this to manipulate the markets. And what have we seen? We’ve seen the president completely change his explanation of what he wants. Just days ago, he was calling for unconditional surrender. Now he’s saying, okay, we want to make a deal with such and such terms. And this is complete strategic incoherence. And despite the fact that we have a military that can hit any target that trump tells it to hit, if we have no strategic direction, then there’s no clear way to get to the end of this war.” “Now, it’s a good thing, I think, that Trump has realized that he’s going to have to deal with the Iranians. But to do so in a way that has no coherence and no actual plan for extricating the U.S. out of this war is is diplomatic malpractice.”

“Trump was bluffing. They called his bluff. And he backed down. And you can say that he was doing this to soothe the markets. Another way to say that is that he’s doing this to manipulate the markets. And what have we seen? We’ve seen the president completely change his explanation of what he wants. Just days ago, he was calling for unconditional surrender. Now he’s saying, okay, we want to make a deal with such and such terms. And this is complete strategic incoherence. And despite the fact that we have a military that can hit any target that trump tells it to hit, if we have no strategic direction, then there’s no clear way to get to the end of this war.” “Now, it’s a good thing, I think, that Trump has realized that he’s going to have to deal with the Iranians. But to do so in a way that has no coherence and no actual plan for extricating the U.S. out of this war is is diplomatic malpractice.”

Josh Rogin

158,744 views • 4 months ago

“We have a strategy that’s tactically very effective, but strategically completely bankrupt, because we already started the war and they still have no idea who’s going to run Iran. They have no idea what they’re going to do. And they have no idea what they’re doing. And it’s pretty obvious. And I think that’s grossly irresponsible.” “And for them to come in now and say, oh don’t worry, we’re going to arm thousands of kurdish fighters in the middle of the Iraqi hinterlands and they’re going to solve the problem is just ridiculous. It’s an insult to the intelligence of Americans and an insult to the aspirations for freedom of millions of Iranians.”

“We have a strategy that’s tactically very effective, but strategically completely bankrupt, because we already started the war and they still have no idea who’s going to run Iran. They have no idea what they’re going to do. And they have no idea what they’re doing. And it’s pretty obvious. And I think that’s grossly irresponsible.” “And for them to come in now and say, oh don’t worry, we’re going to arm thousands of kurdish fighters in the middle of the Iraqi hinterlands and they’re going to solve the problem is just ridiculous. It’s an insult to the intelligence of Americans and an insult to the aspirations for freedom of millions of Iranians.”

Josh Rogin

14,479 views • 5 months ago

Yvonne: The minds of Kenyans have shifted towards we will not wait to question things after they have been done, we are going to start to be involved in the process from the beginning. We have now entered the era of a co-presidency and it is a co-presidency between President William Ruto and the people. It is no longer going to be about him up there telling us what to do, we are doing this together and you will listen to us and we will be heard #CitizenNewsGang

Yvonne: The minds of Kenyans have shifted towards we will not wait to question things after they have been done, we are going to start to be involved in the process from the beginning. We have now entered the era of a co-presidency and it is a co-presidency between President William Ruto and the people. It is no longer going to be about him up there telling us what to do, we are doing this together and you will listen to us and we will be heard #CitizenNewsGang

Citizen TV Kenya

184,323 views • 2 years ago

Wow. THIS is leadership. What a man. God Bless America 🇺🇸 RUBIO on the ICC: “We are not members of the ICC, we never signed that treaty, we never joined it” "We have lunatics and crazies involved in the ICC that are talking about charging members of the US military, the President and maybe even the future President” “If people want to sign on to that stupid organisation they can but we are not going to be a part of it” “Now they are going to see the consequences of ignoring us” He’s absolutely right. The ICC and UN have been warped and are being utilised by Leftists and Islamic Nations to try and go after the West. Israel is just the start; the US or anyone that fights Islamic Extremists will be next.

Wow. THIS is leadership. What a man. God Bless America 🇺🇸 RUBIO on the ICC: “We are not members of the ICC, we never signed that treaty, we never joined it” "We have lunatics and crazies involved in the ICC that are talking about charging members of the US military, the President and maybe even the future President” “If people want to sign on to that stupid organisation they can but we are not going to be a part of it” “Now they are going to see the consequences of ignoring us” He’s absolutely right. The ICC and UN have been warped and are being utilised by Leftists and Islamic Nations to try and go after the West. Israel is just the start; the US or anyone that fights Islamic Extremists will be next.

Kosher

83,736 views • 27 days ago

Moulton: The problem is because the president has no idea how to get out of this mess that he started, he might very well escalate further. And in a sense, the war is already escalating because now they have successfully shot down a U.S. Plane. They may have a U.S. Hostage. The president has no plan to end this war. And if he thinks he's going to get out of it by escalating, it's probably going to cost a lot more American lives. And it's going to be even harder to get back to the negotiating table. Unless we want to go to war with Iran every 3 or 4 years, then he's got to have a plan to bring this to a conclusion that's more than just a military action to take out some percentage of their launchers, that they're just going to rebuild anyway.

Moulton: The problem is because the president has no idea how to get out of this mess that he started, he might very well escalate further. And in a sense, the war is already escalating because now they have successfully shot down a U.S. Plane. They may have a U.S. Hostage. The president has no plan to end this war. And if he thinks he's going to get out of it by escalating, it's probably going to cost a lot more American lives. And it's going to be even harder to get back to the negotiating table. Unless we want to go to war with Iran every 3 or 4 years, then he's got to have a plan to bring this to a conclusion that's more than just a military action to take out some percentage of their launchers, that they're just going to rebuild anyway.

Acyn

39,566 views • 4 months ago

Trump: I hope we get cooperation from the courts because you know, we have thousands of people that are ready to go out. And you cannot have a trial for all of these people. The system was not meant that not -- we don't think there is anything that says… We are getting them out. And a judge cannot say no, you have to have a trial. The trial is going to take two years. No, we are going to have a very dangerous country if we are not allowed to do what we are entitled to do.

Trump: I hope we get cooperation from the courts because you know, we have thousands of people that are ready to go out. And you cannot have a trial for all of these people. The system was not meant that not -- we don't think there is anything that says… We are getting them out. And a judge cannot say no, you have to have a trial. The trial is going to take two years. No, we are going to have a very dangerous country if we are not allowed to do what we are entitled to do.

Acyn

327,595 views • 1 year ago

Trump on Iran: They’re going to give up nuclear weapons. They’re going to give us the nuclear dust. They’re going to do everything that we want to do. And you know what? They’re going to go on and maybe have a great country again. But if they don’t do that, they’re not going to have a country.

Trump on Iran: They’re going to give up nuclear weapons. They’re going to give us the nuclear dust. They’re going to do everything that we want to do. And you know what? They’re going to go on and maybe have a great country again. But if they don’t do that, they’re not going to have a country.

Clash Report

66,143 views • 4 months ago

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

Svetlana Lokhova

254,325 views • 7 months ago

Subramanyam: Well, the reality is, you know, this administration works for Donald Trump, right? Even the independent agencies and even prosecutors who are supposed to put law and justice above politics have been told to only investigate Democrats and to only do what makes the president look good throughout this entire investigation. So if they are in possession of the files, we have deep concerns that they would manipulate those files in some way. The other thing we are concerned they’re going to do is only release files that either make the president look good or only release files that the president chooses to agree to release — and not tell the whole story, protecting the president and his friends, and anyone else the president deems worth protecting. So, this is a concern. He’s signed the bill, but this is only the beginning of the fight to make sure we get the full, unredacted release of the files, which is what we really need.

Subramanyam: Well, the reality is, you know, this administration works for Donald Trump, right? Even the independent agencies and even prosecutors who are supposed to put law and justice above politics have been told to only investigate Democrats and to only do what makes the president look good throughout this entire investigation. So if they are in possession of the files, we have deep concerns that they would manipulate those files in some way. The other thing we are concerned they’re going to do is only release files that either make the president look good or only release files that the president chooses to agree to release — and not tell the whole story, protecting the president and his friends, and anyone else the president deems worth protecting. So, this is a concern. He’s signed the bill, but this is only the beginning of the fight to make sure we get the full, unredacted release of the files, which is what we really need.

Acyn

46,383 views • 9 months ago

Arteta asked if the current team are better than the invincibles: “No, because Invincibles won a lot and they won consistently and they created a history and legacy and we have to do that. “Obviously there is a lot of stats, but in the last two or three years, as well, we had stats and more points and more goals and the history of that, but at the end we have to translate that into major trophies and what we want to do, and probably now what we are doing. “It would have been enough, but now it's not enough, and we have to make it the margins even bigger, and that's what we have to aim for.”

Arteta asked if the current team are better than the invincibles: “No, because Invincibles won a lot and they won consistently and they created a history and legacy and we have to do that. “Obviously there is a lot of stats, but in the last two or three years, as well, we had stats and more points and more goals and the history of that, but at the end we have to translate that into major trophies and what we want to do, and probably now what we are doing. “It would have been enough, but now it's not enough, and we have to make it the margins even bigger, and that's what we have to aim for.”

Connor Humm

83,193 views • 7 months ago

Steve Witkoff on Iran: We have a 15-point deal on the table that the Iranians have had for a bit of time. We expect an answer from them and it would solve it all. It would solve the enrichment question, which is we can't have enrichment there today. It would solve the material question. They have close to 10,000 kilograms of enriched material stockpiled, which they have to give up. It would solve the stockpiling question and the oversight question.

Steve Witkoff on Iran: We have a 15-point deal on the table that the Iranians have had for a bit of time. We expect an answer from them and it would solve it all. It would solve the enrichment question, which is we can't have enrichment there today. It would solve the material question. They have close to 10,000 kilograms of enriched material stockpiled, which they have to give up. It would solve the stockpiling question and the oversight question.

Clash Report

35,506 views • 4 months ago

Thiel Fellow and cofounder of The Antifraud Company Alex Shieh says he's building the Palantir of fraud detection: "People have always been able to find fraud manually. But usually they either luck into it or they have a tip from an insider. "We're trying to eliminate that bottleneck. We want to find the fraud using AI." "We're tapping into all these sources of data. And once we have a good idea of what's going on, we send out human investigators to go talk to sources." "But we want to be going outbound. We don't want to have to wait for people to come to us. Because that's just less efficient. When there's $600 billion in fraud, you're not going to get tips for most of it. And if you want to solve it, this is the way you have to go."

Thiel Fellow and cofounder of The Antifraud Company Alex Shieh says he's building the Palantir of fraud detection: "People have always been able to find fraud manually. But usually they either luck into it or they have a tip from an insider. "We're trying to eliminate that bottleneck. We want to find the fraud using AI." "We're tapping into all these sources of data. And once we have a good idea of what's going on, we send out human investigators to go talk to sources." "But we want to be going outbound. We don't want to have to wait for people to come to us. Because that's just less efficient. When there's $600 billion in fraud, you're not going to get tips for most of it. And if you want to solve it, this is the way you have to go."

TBPN

21,560 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | New Jersey, US: On Harvard University, US President Donald Trump says, "Part of the problem with Harvard is they're about 31% foreigners coming to Harvard. We give them billions of dollars, which is ridiculous. We do grants, which we're probably not going to be doing many grants anymore to Harvard...They're at 31%, but they refuse to tell us who the people are. We want to know.... A lot of the foreign students we wouldn't have a problem with...I am not going to have a problem with foreign students, but it shouldn't be 31%, it's too much. Because, we have Americans who want to go there and other places and can't go there... No foreign government contributes money to Harvard. We do. So why are they doing so many? Number two, we want a list of those foreign students, and we'll find out whether or not they are okay. Many will be okay...and I assume with Harvard, many will be bad. And then the other thing is they're very antisemitic, everybody knows they're antisemitic, and that's got to stop immediately" (Video source - US Network Pool via Reuters)

#WATCH | New Jersey, US: On Harvard University, US President Donald Trump says, "Part of the problem with Harvard is they're about 31% foreigners coming to Harvard. We give them billions of dollars, which is ridiculous. We do grants, which we're probably not going to be doing many grants anymore to Harvard...They're at 31%, but they refuse to tell us who the people are. We want to know.... A lot of the foreign students we wouldn't have a problem with...I am not going to have a problem with foreign students, but it shouldn't be 31%, it's too much. Because, we have Americans who want to go there and other places and can't go there... No foreign government contributes money to Harvard. We do. So why are they doing so many? Number two, we want a list of those foreign students, and we'll find out whether or not they are okay. Many will be okay...and I assume with Harvard, many will be bad. And then the other thing is they're very antisemitic, everybody knows they're antisemitic, and that's got to stop immediately" (Video source - US Network Pool via Reuters)

ANI

348,361 views • 1 year ago

“If we don’t do something now, we are on a dangerous road. A day of reckoning is coming. As a world, we’re going to see it. And we have no excuse. We have no excuse when everything comes to bear and this box is opened and we see inside. We have no excuse as a nation. We have no excuse as a world to look at this and say we didn’t know. We do know… When we start to go in to northern Gaza, we are going to see things that are going to bring the world to their knees. Mark my words, we are going to see human suffering like the world has not seen in a long time. And it’s going to bring us to our knees. And we have an opportunity right now to stop this and to do the right thing. And if we don’t, we are complicit in that. And the world is going to see it. And that day is coming.” — Former GHF contractor Anthony Aguilar on why he is speaking out (via MSNBC, The Weekend Primetime)

“If we don’t do something now, we are on a dangerous road. A day of reckoning is coming. As a world, we’re going to see it. And we have no excuse. We have no excuse when everything comes to bear and this box is opened and we see inside. We have no excuse as a nation. We have no excuse as a world to look at this and say we didn’t know. We do know… When we start to go in to northern Gaza, we are going to see things that are going to bring the world to their knees. Mark my words, we are going to see human suffering like the world has not seen in a long time. And it’s going to bring us to our knees. And we have an opportunity right now to stop this and to do the right thing. And if we don’t, we are complicit in that. And the world is going to see it. And that day is coming.” — Former GHF contractor Anthony Aguilar on why he is speaking out (via MSNBC, The Weekend Primetime)

Drop Site

218,370 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING: Meeting in the Oval Office with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Keir Starmer), President Trump pushes the narrative that the tariffs he's imposing on Canada, Mexico and China are paid by those nations rather than the American people, says he trusts Putin, believes the Russian President will keep his words, adds that but everything should be verified. President Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer held a significant meeting in the Oval Office, discussing critical issues such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, trade, and the future of the U.S.-UK relationship. Trump expressed optimism about a potential peace deal with Russia, stressing the importance of a lasting agreement and indicating that Ukraine’s NATO membership was not on the table. On Russia and Ukraine: "President Zelensky is coming to see me on Friday, Friday morning, and we're going to be signing really a very important agreement for both sides because it's really going to get us into that country." - President Trump "I think we’re very well advanced on a deal. But we have not made a deal yet. So I don’t like to talk about peacekeeping until we have a deal." - President Trump "When we have a deal, it’s going to be the deal. I don’t think if I didn’t win the election, I don’t think we’d be even talking to Putin right now or anybody else." - President Trump "I think Russia has been acting very well. We have representatives Steve Witkoff and Scott and Marco and J.D. we’re all involved, every one of us and a lot more. But I think we’re very well advanced on a deal." - President Trump "I don’t think he’s going to violate his word. I don’t think he’ll be back when we make a deal. I think the deal is going to hold." - President Trump (on President Putin) "I think we both can be that way. It’s trust and verify. You never know what you’re getting." - President Trump (on trust with Putin) "But on the NATO, it’s just not going to happen. That’s what started this whole thing. Biden said that, and all of a sudden the gun started." - President Trump "We want to work with him [Zelensky], and we will work with him. We have a very good relationship with President Zelensky." - President Trump "It’s not going to happen, and that’s what started this whole thing." - President Trump (on Ukraine joining NATO) On Tariffs and Europe: "We’re going to have reciprocal tariffs. Whatever they charge us, we’re going to charge them." - President Trump "I had put a lot of tariffs on in my first term and we’ve made tremendous amounts of progress because of those tariffs." - President Trump "The EU has been really very bad to us in terms of trade." - President Trump "I think we’re going to have a great relationship with Europe, but we’ve had problems with the EU because they tariff, they do it in the form of a VAT tax, which is about 20%, and many other taxes." - President Trump "They sell us cars, we don’t sell them cars, they don’t take our cars, they don’t take much of our agriculture, and we have a deficit with them of about $350 billion." - President Trump "We are going to have a great relationship, but I think I predicted that was going to happen, and it did happen, and it’ll work itself out." - President Trump (on Brexit and the future of the UK-EU relationship) "The EU was very, very tough on us in terms of trade. And I’m a different kind of a president. I can’t let that happen." - President Trump "We’re going to have a good discussion and we’ll be talking about Europe today, but Europe’s been very tough on us in terms of trade." - President Trump

BREAKING: Meeting in the Oval Office with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (Keir Starmer), President Trump pushes the narrative that the tariffs he's imposing on Canada, Mexico and China are paid by those nations rather than the American people, says he trusts Putin, believes the Russian President will keep his words, adds that but everything should be verified. President Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer held a significant meeting in the Oval Office, discussing critical issues such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, trade, and the future of the U.S.-UK relationship. Trump expressed optimism about a potential peace deal with Russia, stressing the importance of a lasting agreement and indicating that Ukraine’s NATO membership was not on the table. On Russia and Ukraine: "President Zelensky is coming to see me on Friday, Friday morning, and we're going to be signing really a very important agreement for both sides because it's really going to get us into that country." - President Trump "I think we’re very well advanced on a deal. But we have not made a deal yet. So I don’t like to talk about peacekeeping until we have a deal." - President Trump "When we have a deal, it’s going to be the deal. I don’t think if I didn’t win the election, I don’t think we’d be even talking to Putin right now or anybody else." - President Trump "I think Russia has been acting very well. We have representatives Steve Witkoff and Scott and Marco and J.D. we’re all involved, every one of us and a lot more. But I think we’re very well advanced on a deal." - President Trump "I don’t think he’s going to violate his word. I don’t think he’ll be back when we make a deal. I think the deal is going to hold." - President Trump (on President Putin) "I think we both can be that way. It’s trust and verify. You never know what you’re getting." - President Trump (on trust with Putin) "But on the NATO, it’s just not going to happen. That’s what started this whole thing. Biden said that, and all of a sudden the gun started." - President Trump "We want to work with him [Zelensky], and we will work with him. We have a very good relationship with President Zelensky." - President Trump "It’s not going to happen, and that’s what started this whole thing." - President Trump (on Ukraine joining NATO) On Tariffs and Europe: "We’re going to have reciprocal tariffs. Whatever they charge us, we’re going to charge them." - President Trump "I had put a lot of tariffs on in my first term and we’ve made tremendous amounts of progress because of those tariffs." - President Trump "The EU has been really very bad to us in terms of trade." - President Trump "I think we’re going to have a great relationship with Europe, but we’ve had problems with the EU because they tariff, they do it in the form of a VAT tax, which is about 20%, and many other taxes." - President Trump "They sell us cars, we don’t sell them cars, they don’t take our cars, they don’t take much of our agriculture, and we have a deficit with them of about $350 billion." - President Trump "We are going to have a great relationship, but I think I predicted that was going to happen, and it did happen, and it’ll work itself out." - President Trump (on Brexit and the future of the UK-EU relationship) "The EU was very, very tough on us in terms of trade. And I’m a different kind of a president. I can’t let that happen." - President Trump "We’re going to have a good discussion and we’ll be talking about Europe today, but Europe’s been very tough on us in terms of trade." - President Trump

Simon Ateba

11,676 views • 1 year ago

SCARBOROUGH: If Donald Trump and his administration didn't hate Zelenskyy and Ukraine so much, they would have called them before the Iran war and said: "Listen, we're going to go in there. We know Iranians have been supplying drones to Russia. Tell us, how do we stop them?"

SCARBOROUGH: If Donald Trump and his administration didn't hate Zelenskyy and Ukraine so much, they would have called them before the Iran war and said: "Listen, we're going to go in there. We know Iranians have been supplying drones to Russia. Tell us, how do we stop them?"

Kate from Kharkiv

213,309 views • 4 months ago

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (UK Column) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (UK Column) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."

Sense Receptor

36,952 views • 6 months ago