正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

“We have a strategy that’s tactically very effective, but strategically completely bankrupt, because we already started the war and they still have no idea who’s going to run Iran. They have no idea what they’re going to do. And they have no idea what they’re doing. And it’s pretty... show more

Josh Rogin

259,746 subscribers

14,479 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"If you ask a Muslim if they’re going to heaven, they have no idea if they’re going to heaven. muslims have no idea if they’re doing enough to the afterlife. i have insane respect for muslims because of the 5 pillars of islam--one of them being giving alms (zakat)"

"If you ask a Muslim if they’re going to heaven, they have no idea if they’re going to heaven. muslims have no idea if they’re doing enough to the afterlife. i have insane respect for muslims because of the 5 pillars of islam--one of them being giving alms (zakat)"

JM News Network

507,448 次观看 • 9 个月前

Scott Jennings says we have no say over Israel’s actions in Iran. I disagree. “We are the senior partner, they’re the junior partner. We have the weapons, we give them the weapons. We’re funding this war. We’re the great power. They’re our client state. So in theory, we should be able to have the more than a 50% say in whether American blood and treasure is spent to perpetuate this war for months and months. And it’s pretty clear from what President Trump said today about the war he wants to get out very soon. He keeps saying it. He wants to get out very soon. And it’s pretty clear from what Netanyahu said today that he doesn’t want to get out very soon.” “So both of those people can’t win. One of them is going to be right, and one of them is going to be wrong. So who’s going to win that disagreement? Is it going to be Trump and we’re going to end the war soon? Or is it going to be Bibi, the war is going to go on for a very long time? Both of them can’t be right, Scott. And in the end, we’re going to find out who really wears the pants in this bromance.”

Scott Jennings says we have no say over Israel’s actions in Iran. I disagree. “We are the senior partner, they’re the junior partner. We have the weapons, we give them the weapons. We’re funding this war. We’re the great power. They’re our client state. So in theory, we should be able to have the more than a 50% say in whether American blood and treasure is spent to perpetuate this war for months and months. And it’s pretty clear from what President Trump said today about the war he wants to get out very soon. He keeps saying it. He wants to get out very soon. And it’s pretty clear from what Netanyahu said today that he doesn’t want to get out very soon.” “So both of those people can’t win. One of them is going to be right, and one of them is going to be wrong. So who’s going to win that disagreement? Is it going to be Trump and we’re going to end the war soon? Or is it going to be Bibi, the war is going to go on for a very long time? Both of them can’t be right, Scott. And in the end, we’re going to find out who really wears the pants in this bromance.”

Josh Rogin

38,678 次观看 • 3 个月前

Trump on Iran: They’re going to give up nuclear weapons. They’re going to give us the nuclear dust. They’re going to do everything that we want to do. And you know what? They’re going to go on and maybe have a great country again. But if they don’t do that, they’re not going to have a country.

Trump on Iran: They’re going to give up nuclear weapons. They’re going to give us the nuclear dust. They’re going to do everything that we want to do. And you know what? They’re going to go on and maybe have a great country again. But if they don’t do that, they’re not going to have a country.

Clash Report

66,143 次观看 • 3 个月前

romance peaked in this scene, the music sounds to what falling in love feels like and they’re so innocent here, they have no idea of just how meant to be they are, and that it’s just the beginning

romance peaked in this scene, the music sounds to what falling in love feels like and they’re so innocent here, they have no idea of just how meant to be they are, and that it’s just the beginning

nini ♡

13,256 次观看 • 1 年前

Fox News: “So far, Germany, Italy, and Japan have said they will not send ships to” the Middle East to help keep the Strait of Hormuz open.” Lawrence B. Jones: “Well, they fell for the trap because, as the president said during the press conference yesterday, it’s almost a test. He goes, do we really need them? No, but he goes, I kind of want to see what they’re going to say to us. Are they going to be there—and they’re kind of proving his theory.” Cut off all funding to these countries!

Fox News: “So far, Germany, Italy, and Japan have said they will not send ships to” the Middle East to help keep the Strait of Hormuz open.” Lawrence B. Jones: “Well, they fell for the trap because, as the president said during the press conference yesterday, it’s almost a test. He goes, do we really need them? No, but he goes, I kind of want to see what they’re going to say to us. Are they going to be there—and they’re kind of proving his theory.” Cut off all funding to these countries!

RedWave Press

1,356,201 次观看 • 3 个月前

Rep. Andy Biggs just revealed on air that the House Oversight Committee is planning to subpoena Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to testify in Washington. BIGGS: “And let me just tell you that the Oversight Committee, we’re going to have to bring in Tim Walz, we’re going to have to bring in some of his adjutants and have them come in and sit down and answer questions.” “We’re going to have to get hold of records that they have, and we’re going to have to do what the Oversight Committee does when we conduct these investigations.” “And then we make our referrals over to the executive branch because they have police power.” “And I don’t want to sound prejudiced or biased at the start of this thing, but, I mean, this is incredible.”

Rep. Andy Biggs just revealed on air that the House Oversight Committee is planning to subpoena Minnesota Governor Tim Walz to testify in Washington. BIGGS: “And let me just tell you that the Oversight Committee, we’re going to have to bring in Tim Walz, we’re going to have to bring in some of his adjutants and have them come in and sit down and answer questions.” “We’re going to have to get hold of records that they have, and we’re going to have to do what the Oversight Committee does when we conduct these investigations.” “And then we make our referrals over to the executive branch because they have police power.” “And I don’t want to sound prejudiced or biased at the start of this thing, but, I mean, this is incredible.”

Overton

84,455 次观看 • 6 个月前

RFK Jr: “If we were gonna go to war, say WW2 … they had to go to the public and say we’re gonna raise taxes to pay for this war” “They wouldn’t have supported it for Vietnam. They wouldn’t have supported it for Iraq. They wouldn’t have supported it for Ukraine. Or, they had to … sell war bonds, which was another way of getting the public to pay the cost of war. But they had to be straight about it. Everybody had skin in the game. Now, they don’t have to do that at all. They don’t even declare war. They just say we’re gonna spend $200 billion on a war with Russia, but we’re gonna get Ukraine to bring the war, we’re gonna kill 600,000 of their kids in a war we can’t win. We’re gonna be able to sell all our weapons to Ukraine. So, BlackRock owns Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, Boeing, Lockheed, all of the military contractors, they’re making the money on the war. They have the contract for rebuilding Ukraine, they’re gonna make another half trillion on that. And they’re the big donor to the Democrat and Republican Party. This whole thing is fixed and it’s rigged, and they don’t even have to come to us and say we’re gonna have another one of these wars. They just print the money. It’s all a very incestuous and corrupt problem. Bitcoin is not only an off-ramp to this inflationary highway, which is the highway to hell, but it’s also a way of restoring integrity to our government. It’s a way of restoring personal freedoms. The middle class can insulate itself from inflation, which is just a form of government theft. I’m gonna do a basket of hard currencies, platinum and gold and other hard currencies, and begin issuing at least a class of Treasury bills that are anchored to hard currency, let’s say the first year 1%, and then maybe the next year 2% and watch how that goes. I would like to have the federal government begin to buy Bitcoin and over my term in office, ultimately have an equivalent amount of Bitcoin that we have gold. If we want to save our democracy, we need to decentralize it.”

RFK Jr: “If we were gonna go to war, say WW2 … they had to go to the public and say we’re gonna raise taxes to pay for this war” “They wouldn’t have supported it for Vietnam. They wouldn’t have supported it for Iraq. They wouldn’t have supported it for Ukraine. Or, they had to … sell war bonds, which was another way of getting the public to pay the cost of war. But they had to be straight about it. Everybody had skin in the game. Now, they don’t have to do that at all. They don’t even declare war. They just say we’re gonna spend $200 billion on a war with Russia, but we’re gonna get Ukraine to bring the war, we’re gonna kill 600,000 of their kids in a war we can’t win. We’re gonna be able to sell all our weapons to Ukraine. So, BlackRock owns Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics, Boeing, Lockheed, all of the military contractors, they’re making the money on the war. They have the contract for rebuilding Ukraine, they’re gonna make another half trillion on that. And they’re the big donor to the Democrat and Republican Party. This whole thing is fixed and it’s rigged, and they don’t even have to come to us and say we’re gonna have another one of these wars. They just print the money. It’s all a very incestuous and corrupt problem. Bitcoin is not only an off-ramp to this inflationary highway, which is the highway to hell, but it’s also a way of restoring integrity to our government. It’s a way of restoring personal freedoms. The middle class can insulate itself from inflation, which is just a form of government theft. I’m gonna do a basket of hard currencies, platinum and gold and other hard currencies, and begin issuing at least a class of Treasury bills that are anchored to hard currency, let’s say the first year 1%, and then maybe the next year 2% and watch how that goes. I would like to have the federal government begin to buy Bitcoin and over my term in office, ultimately have an equivalent amount of Bitcoin that we have gold. If we want to save our democracy, we need to decentralize it.”

MAHA PAC🗽

192,418 次观看 • 1 年前

Scott Jennings previewing President Trump’s address to the nation tonight: “Obama blamed George W. Bush for eight years… There has to be a debate. We’re going to have an election, so we’re going to have a debate. And right now, you have Democratic Party with an 18% approval rating with some kind of amnesia about what they did to support Joe Biden’s destruction of the American economy for four years. He can’t let that go. I mean, if we’re going to have an election and have a debate, you have to lay out what we’re for and what we’re doing, what we inherited. They got the shovels, we got the ladders. I mean, that’s the nature of a political campaign.” “He’s going to have to continue to sell the Big, Beautiful Bill, the tax cuts, the deregulation, what they’ve done on energy. Gas prices are low, and they do believe they are going to see an economic boom in the first quarter.” “I interviewed Kevin Hassett today. He and Bessent and the economic guys are very confident that the things they did this year are going to… their benefit in the new year. Again, this is part of selling what you’ve done to recover from the mess that you inherited.” “So, I sort of view all this in the context of here comes the election, and we’re not going to let the Democrats get away with blaming Trump for affordability when they’re the ones that burn the house down in the first place.”

Scott Jennings previewing President Trump’s address to the nation tonight: “Obama blamed George W. Bush for eight years… There has to be a debate. We’re going to have an election, so we’re going to have a debate. And right now, you have Democratic Party with an 18% approval rating with some kind of amnesia about what they did to support Joe Biden’s destruction of the American economy for four years. He can’t let that go. I mean, if we’re going to have an election and have a debate, you have to lay out what we’re for and what we’re doing, what we inherited. They got the shovels, we got the ladders. I mean, that’s the nature of a political campaign.” “He’s going to have to continue to sell the Big, Beautiful Bill, the tax cuts, the deregulation, what they’ve done on energy. Gas prices are low, and they do believe they are going to see an economic boom in the first quarter.” “I interviewed Kevin Hassett today. He and Bessent and the economic guys are very confident that the things they did this year are going to… their benefit in the new year. Again, this is part of selling what you’ve done to recover from the mess that you inherited.” “So, I sort of view all this in the context of here comes the election, and we’re not going to let the Democrats get away with blaming Trump for affordability when they’re the ones that burn the house down in the first place.”

RedWave Press

235,699 次观看 • 6 个月前

Steyer: Becerra is saying, “We’re not going to change anything.” And I’m saying that’s ridiculous. The truth is, we have to make California affordable for Californians, and we have to get back to the idea of a joyous state where we not only imagine the future, we create it—and we do it together.

Steyer: Becerra is saying, “We’re not going to change anything.” And I’m saying that’s ridiculous. The truth is, we have to make California affordable for Californians, and we have to get back to the idea of a joyous state where we not only imagine the future, we create it—and we do it together.

Acyn

54,446 次观看 • 1 个月前

- The useful idiots have no idea why they’re in the streets… THEY THINK IT’S TO FIGHT ICE. That’s why they’re referred to as the useful idiots -

- The useful idiots have no idea why they’re in the streets… THEY THINK IT’S TO FIGHT ICE. That’s why they’re referred to as the useful idiots -

Tim Cramer

32,181 次观看 • 5 个月前

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “But then regarding Cuba, there was an aircraft carrier that just arrived there. Just this week, the Nimitz aircraft carrier. Are you sending that there to intimidate the Cuban government?” President Trump: “No, not at all. The Cubans look, it’s a failed country. Everybody knows it. They don’t have electricity. They don’t have money. They don’t have really anything. They don’t have food. And we’re going to help them along. And we’re going to help them because the people — because, number one, I want to help them. I don’t want to on a humanitarian basis. But we have the Cuban American population, much of it living in Miami, in Florida. That’s a great group of people, amazing group of people, industrious, just they’re great Americans. They’ve wanted this to happen. They want to go back to their country. They want to help their country. I hope they’re going to stay here, but they want to go back. They want to invest in their country and, you know, see if they can bring it back. Other presidents have looked at this for 50, 60 years doing something, and it looks like I’ll be the one that does it. So it would be happy to do it. We want to open it up to Cuban Americans where they can go back and help.”

NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez: “But then regarding Cuba, there was an aircraft carrier that just arrived there. Just this week, the Nimitz aircraft carrier. Are you sending that there to intimidate the Cuban government?” President Trump: “No, not at all. The Cubans look, it’s a failed country. Everybody knows it. They don’t have electricity. They don’t have money. They don’t have really anything. They don’t have food. And we’re going to help them along. And we’re going to help them because the people — because, number one, I want to help them. I don’t want to on a humanitarian basis. But we have the Cuban American population, much of it living in Miami, in Florida. That’s a great group of people, amazing group of people, industrious, just they’re great Americans. They’ve wanted this to happen. They want to go back to their country. They want to help their country. I hope they’re going to stay here, but they want to go back. They want to invest in their country and, you know, see if they can bring it back. Other presidents have looked at this for 50, 60 years doing something, and it looks like I’ll be the one that does it. So it would be happy to do it. We want to open it up to Cuban Americans where they can go back and help.”

Curtis Houck

26,469 次观看 • 1 个月前

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Silicon Valley is still underestimating AI and it’s disproportionately hurting democrats: “If you’re going to disrupt the economic and political power of the democrat base— and you believe that’s going to work out politically— you're in an insane asylum.” “This technology disrupts humanities-trained, largely democratic voters, and makes their economic power, less. And increases the power of vocationally trained, working class (often male) voters.” “These disruptions are going to disrupt every aspect of our society.” “To make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology, and how we’re going to explain to people who are likely going to have less good, and less interesting jobs from their perspective…” “These technologies are dangerous societally. The only justification you could possibly have is— if we don’t do it, our adversaries will, and we’ll be subject to their rule of law.” “If you decouple this from the support of the military, you’re going to have an enormous problem explaining to be American people— why is it we’re observing the risk of disrupting the very fabric of our society, if it’s not because it’s about maintaining our ability to be American?” “If you don’t believe it— look at the battlefield. What do you think the Chinese and Russians are saying about what they’re seeing on the battlefield right now? They’re not saying this is some incremental technology.” “They’re saying, ‘Wait— the last time we saw America fight it was Afghanistan and nothing worked.’”

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Silicon Valley is still underestimating AI and it’s disproportionately hurting democrats: “If you’re going to disrupt the economic and political power of the democrat base— and you believe that’s going to work out politically— you're in an insane asylum.” “This technology disrupts humanities-trained, largely democratic voters, and makes their economic power, less. And increases the power of vocationally trained, working class (often male) voters.” “These disruptions are going to disrupt every aspect of our society.” “To make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology, and how we’re going to explain to people who are likely going to have less good, and less interesting jobs from their perspective…” “These technologies are dangerous societally. The only justification you could possibly have is— if we don’t do it, our adversaries will, and we’ll be subject to their rule of law.” “If you decouple this from the support of the military, you’re going to have an enormous problem explaining to be American people— why is it we’re observing the risk of disrupting the very fabric of our society, if it’s not because it’s about maintaining our ability to be American?” “If you don’t believe it— look at the battlefield. What do you think the Chinese and Russians are saying about what they’re seeing on the battlefield right now? They’re not saying this is some incremental technology.” “They’re saying, ‘Wait— the last time we saw America fight it was Afghanistan and nothing worked.’”

Jawwwn

66,645 次观看 • 3 个月前

MUST WATCH 🔴 I feel it’s important to understand what the Pro IRGC camp thinks. Mario Nawfal hosts “expert” Scott Ritter in front of his 3 million followers, where Ritter claims Israel lost the war and is on the verge of collapse. “90 million Iranians have rallied around this government like nobody ever anticipated. So there it is. Israel lost the war. This was a regime change war. Israel made a condition to the United States beforehand. Don’t start this war unless we can guarantee the outcome, which is the end of the regime. That outcome cannot be achieved right now. So all that’s going to happen is Israel is going to be destroyed. That’s all that’s going to happen. Iran is far bigger than Israel. Iran can absorb far more damage than Israel can. Israel’s about to be turned upside down. So now we go back to what does Israel want? They want an off ramp. They wouldn’t want an off ramp if they thought they were winning. They’re not winning. They know they’re not winning. They know they’re not going to win. The same thing with the United States. Iran is about to turn up the heat. And as they turn up the heat, more critical infrastructure will be destroyed. And Israel’s not big. There’s no strategic reserves. There’s no secondary plan, third plan. When you lose your primary infrastructure, you’re done as a nation state. And Israel knows that. What you’re going to see in the coming weeks if this war continues is that Israel will cease to exist as a modern functioning state. And then suddenly, you’re going to be millions of Israelis, you’re going to wake up to the fact that there’s no food, there’s no water, there’s no energy, there’s no life. And they will leave. And that’s the end of the Israeli state.”

MUST WATCH 🔴 I feel it’s important to understand what the Pro IRGC camp thinks. Mario Nawfal hosts “expert” Scott Ritter in front of his 3 million followers, where Ritter claims Israel lost the war and is on the verge of collapse. “90 million Iranians have rallied around this government like nobody ever anticipated. So there it is. Israel lost the war. This was a regime change war. Israel made a condition to the United States beforehand. Don’t start this war unless we can guarantee the outcome, which is the end of the regime. That outcome cannot be achieved right now. So all that’s going to happen is Israel is going to be destroyed. That’s all that’s going to happen. Iran is far bigger than Israel. Iran can absorb far more damage than Israel can. Israel’s about to be turned upside down. So now we go back to what does Israel want? They want an off ramp. They wouldn’t want an off ramp if they thought they were winning. They’re not winning. They know they’re not winning. They know they’re not going to win. The same thing with the United States. Iran is about to turn up the heat. And as they turn up the heat, more critical infrastructure will be destroyed. And Israel’s not big. There’s no strategic reserves. There’s no secondary plan, third plan. When you lose your primary infrastructure, you’re done as a nation state. And Israel knows that. What you’re going to see in the coming weeks if this war continues is that Israel will cease to exist as a modern functioning state. And then suddenly, you’re going to be millions of Israelis, you’re going to wake up to the fact that there’s no food, there’s no water, there’s no energy, there’s no life. And they will leave. And that’s the end of the Israeli state.”

Open Source Intel

140,497 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨IRAN’S STRATEGY AGAINST THE US & ISRAEL EXPLAINED ‘What they’re going to do is continue to increase the costs economically on the United States and its partners, so much so that we basically buckle under the economic and therefore political strain, notably going into the midterms. And that basically forces us to disengage, if not negotiate a full peace treaty. Which I think, by the way, if there is an off-ramp, I think that we’re going to use Putin to negotiate as an intermediary, with Trump and the leadership of Iran. If there is an off-ramp to this thing, it’s not going to see the return of US power in the Middle East ever. It’ll be a very diminished presence at best. And I think Israel will go back to being sort of a contained entity the way it was in the 1970s and 80s. Because the Arab states, they’re never going to want to get close to Israel again, and they’re going to be looking for a third way. So I think ultimately it’s not necessarily total destruction of Israel and the US unless things keep escalating. I think the Iranian view is: we just have to bloody them so much that they know if they ever try something like this again, it will put them into the Great Depression again. It’s a very smart strategic outlook, and we completely misread and misunderstood it.’ -Brandon Weichert, Senior National Security Editor at 19FortyFive and Author of ‘The Shadow War: Iran’s Quest for Supremacy’, joins us for Monday’s Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies 👇 Brandon Weichert

🚨IRAN’S STRATEGY AGAINST THE US & ISRAEL EXPLAINED ‘What they’re going to do is continue to increase the costs economically on the United States and its partners, so much so that we basically buckle under the economic and therefore political strain, notably going into the midterms. And that basically forces us to disengage, if not negotiate a full peace treaty. Which I think, by the way, if there is an off-ramp, I think that we’re going to use Putin to negotiate as an intermediary, with Trump and the leadership of Iran. If there is an off-ramp to this thing, it’s not going to see the return of US power in the Middle East ever. It’ll be a very diminished presence at best. And I think Israel will go back to being sort of a contained entity the way it was in the 1970s and 80s. Because the Arab states, they’re never going to want to get close to Israel again, and they’re going to be looking for a third way. So I think ultimately it’s not necessarily total destruction of Israel and the US unless things keep escalating. I think the Iranian view is: we just have to bloody them so much that they know if they ever try something like this again, it will put them into the Great Depression again. It’s a very smart strategic outlook, and we completely misread and misunderstood it.’ -Brandon Weichert, Senior National Security Editor at 19FortyFive and Author of ‘The Shadow War: Iran’s Quest for Supremacy’, joins us for Monday’s Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies 👇 Brandon Weichert

Going Underground

107,508 次观看 • 3 个月前

Trump: Greenland is very important for the peace of the world. I think Denmark and the EU understands it and if they don’t, we’re going to have to explain it to them

Trump: Greenland is very important for the peace of the world. I think Denmark and the EU understands it and if they don’t, we’re going to have to explain it to them

Acyn

113,683 次观看 • 1 年前

They're going to send your sons and daughters off to war for a blood sacrifice to Israel and they don't even know what the goals are. Blumenthal: "It looks more and more likely there will be boots on the ground and we have no idea what the goals of this war are."

They're going to send your sons and daughters off to war for a blood sacrifice to Israel and they don't even know what the goals are. Blumenthal: "It looks more and more likely there will be boots on the ground and we have no idea what the goals of this war are."

Anonymous

56,109 次观看 • 4 个月前

Victor Davis Hanson draws an uncanny comparison between President Trump and Winston Churchill — two leaders warning about a growing threat while the world refuses to listen. Hanson said that for 47 years, every U.S. president promised to deal with Iran, but Trump is the first one to actually do it. HANSON: “In 1939 Churchill had warned everybody about the threat of fascism on the continent…nobody listened to him.” “Then after the war broke out, nobody called on him and then finally he came in and from May 10th of 1940 he was saying to everybody, these people want to take over the continent.” “He was the voice in the wilderness.” “That’s what Trump is trying to do, trying to say to the American Democratic party, what’s left of it, you don’t understand what’s going on here.” “You Europeans don’t understand, you people in the Middle East don’t fully understand what this regime is about.” “When people say we did not have an imminent threat, we didn’t have an imminent threat when they took our hostages, when they blew up our barracks.” “Nobody said we better attack Iran because we need an imminent threat when they blew up our embassy, they always acted spontaneously with surprises and we never knew what they were going to do.” “The idea you have to have a telegraphed imminent threat, it’s not the nature of that regime.” “It’s lying, disguise and dissimulation. That’s their pattern for the last 47 years.” “But nobody’s taken them seriously.” “Every president’s said we’re going to deal with this, all seven of them and all seven did not.” “And then all seven of them when they got out of office said I regret that I didn’t” “He’s the first one that warned the world and said he’s not going to be one of those presidents.”

Victor Davis Hanson draws an uncanny comparison between President Trump and Winston Churchill — two leaders warning about a growing threat while the world refuses to listen. Hanson said that for 47 years, every U.S. president promised to deal with Iran, but Trump is the first one to actually do it. HANSON: “In 1939 Churchill had warned everybody about the threat of fascism on the continent…nobody listened to him.” “Then after the war broke out, nobody called on him and then finally he came in and from May 10th of 1940 he was saying to everybody, these people want to take over the continent.” “He was the voice in the wilderness.” “That’s what Trump is trying to do, trying to say to the American Democratic party, what’s left of it, you don’t understand what’s going on here.” “You Europeans don’t understand, you people in the Middle East don’t fully understand what this regime is about.” “When people say we did not have an imminent threat, we didn’t have an imminent threat when they took our hostages, when they blew up our barracks.” “Nobody said we better attack Iran because we need an imminent threat when they blew up our embassy, they always acted spontaneously with surprises and we never knew what they were going to do.” “The idea you have to have a telegraphed imminent threat, it’s not the nature of that regime.” “It’s lying, disguise and dissimulation. That’s their pattern for the last 47 years.” “But nobody’s taken them seriously.” “Every president’s said we’re going to deal with this, all seven of them and all seven did not.” “And then all seven of them when they got out of office said I regret that I didn’t” “He’s the first one that warned the world and said he’s not going to be one of those presidents.”

Overton

85,200 次观看 • 3 个月前

.President Donald J. Trump on Iran: "We really had the confines of a deal; no nuclear, they were going to give us the dust...and every time they'd make a deal, the next day it’s like we didn't have that conversation...they’re crazy, and you know what? Because of that, they cannot have a nuclear weapon."

.President Donald J. Trump on Iran: "We really had the confines of a deal; no nuclear, they were going to give us the dust...and every time they'd make a deal, the next day it’s like we didn't have that conversation...they’re crazy, and you know what? Because of that, they cannot have a nuclear weapon."

Rapid Response 47

189,381 次观看 • 1 个月前

“We have a secret governance system.” “It’s demonic.” “They basically want to end freedom for most people.” Catherine Austin-Fitts just declared that the deep state central banking cartel is our number one problem. “They’re looking at changing how civilization works in a way which is very, very negative.” “I don’t want to be part of the world they’re building.” “And I don’t think they have the power or the right to do this.” “That’s the problem that needs to get addressed.” “And the first thing you do to address it is you bring transparency to it.” “You turn on the lights.” “When you turn on the lights, what you realize is they’re a small group of people.” “They can’t control everything ultimately.” “Not only do we need to understand who they are and what they’re doing, but then we need to build Plan B.” “Because their plan’s not going to work.” “And it’s going to make a huge mess.” “When their mess is through, we need to be moving towards a real civilization.” The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts Shaun Newman Podcast

“We have a secret governance system.” “It’s demonic.” “They basically want to end freedom for most people.” Catherine Austin-Fitts just declared that the deep state central banking cartel is our number one problem. “They’re looking at changing how civilization works in a way which is very, very negative.” “I don’t want to be part of the world they’re building.” “And I don’t think they have the power or the right to do this.” “That’s the problem that needs to get addressed.” “And the first thing you do to address it is you bring transparency to it.” “You turn on the lights.” “When you turn on the lights, what you realize is they’re a small group of people.” “They can’t control everything ultimately.” “Not only do we need to understand who they are and what they’re doing, but then we need to build Plan B.” “Because their plan’s not going to work.” “And it’s going to make a huge mess.” “When their mess is through, we need to be moving towards a real civilization.” The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts Shaun Newman Podcast

Holden Culotta

109,205 次观看 • 6 天前

AOC: They wanted to issue this statement as though we’re just going after these 30-year-old men on Medicaid playing video games in their basement, right? This was the narrative that we heard. First of all, I think everyone should have healthcare in America, regardless of who you are and what you’re doing. And the idea that there is anyone who is less deserving because of who they are is the problem to begin with. But that’s what they use to justify this, right? Because they want us to do the work for them. They want us to sort ourselves into the idea of deserving and undeserving, or pointing at our neighbors in terms of deserving and undeserving. And that smokescreen — that idea — is how they tried to pass a trillion dollars in healthcare cuts across the board for all of us.

AOC: They wanted to issue this statement as though we’re just going after these 30-year-old men on Medicaid playing video games in their basement, right? This was the narrative that we heard. First of all, I think everyone should have healthcare in America, regardless of who you are and what you’re doing. And the idea that there is anyone who is less deserving because of who they are is the problem to begin with. But that’s what they use to justify this, right? Because they want us to do the work for them. They want us to sort ourselves into the idea of deserving and undeserving, or pointing at our neighbors in terms of deserving and undeserving. And that smokescreen — that idea — is how they tried to pass a trillion dollars in healthcare cuts across the board for all of us.

Acyn

446,733 次观看 • 4 个月前