Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

If Carney didn’t pull that purposeful stunt by running away from the table because he didn’t agree with some of the items on it we wouldn’t have to come crawling back to it. We were right there. Carney’s and our Premier’s reaction to the trade deal triggered all of... show more

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

189,626 subscribers

111,900 просмотров • 7 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Образование Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

SNEAKO: “If everybody was Muslim, the way it should be, we would have world peace, but people have their ego… Because of this ego, because of this problem, we will have chaos for years to come.”

SNEAKO: “If everybody was Muslim, the way it should be, we would have world peace, but people have their ego… Because of this ego, because of this problem, we will have chaos for years to come.”

AutisticClips

212,220 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Trump: I was asked by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Iran. We were all set to go just about at this time right now, and it would have been a massive attack. We were all set to go, but when our allies ask to call it off, you sort of have to say, “Well, let’s see.” And the reason they asked is they think there’s a deal. There’s a deal on Hormuz, and then there will be a deal on the nuclear—or you might call it the denuclearization of Iran. I call it the denuclearization of Iran…. So, we had an attack planned that would have been the biggest attack since World War II, and it would have been disastrous for them. They didn’t want us to do it. And frankly, Saudi Arabia didn’t want it either. I thought a deal was imminent.

Trump: I was asked by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Iran. We were all set to go just about at this time right now, and it would have been a massive attack. We were all set to go, but when our allies ask to call it off, you sort of have to say, “Well, let’s see.” And the reason they asked is they think there’s a deal. There’s a deal on Hormuz, and then there will be a deal on the nuclear—or you might call it the denuclearization of Iran. I call it the denuclearization of Iran…. So, we had an attack planned that would have been the biggest attack since World War II, and it would have been disastrous for them. They didn’t want us to do it. And frankly, Saudi Arabia didn’t want it either. I thought a deal was imminent.

Acyn

240,461 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Doug Ford looking and sounding deflated on CNN today. He talks about wanting a deal to get done, how is that possible when we have emotional children trying to accomplish that? Carney pulling that stunt of walking away because of some items he disagreed with was a purposeful political move. He could have requested more time. No deal keeps the elbows up lunatics satisfied & distracted from the fact his Government still hasn’t accomplished anything meaningful for Canadians. The downward spiral continues.

Doug Ford looking and sounding deflated on CNN today. He talks about wanting a deal to get done, how is that possible when we have emotional children trying to accomplish that? Carney pulling that stunt of walking away because of some items he disagreed with was a purposeful political move. He could have requested more time. No deal keeps the elbows up lunatics satisfied & distracted from the fact his Government still hasn’t accomplished anything meaningful for Canadians. The downward spiral continues.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

79,693 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Dangote: “We didn’t want to go into retail. It was during the time we were building this refinery that they sold Mobil, AP, and Oando. We could have bought them, the three of them didn’t cost 500 million. “If we knew this was going to happen, maybe we would have done it the other way. But we didn’t want to be called a monopoly, that’s why we left that side. Restrict ourselves to production, they will become our customers, and we will have a nice party together. But if they are looking for fights, I have been fighting all my life.”

Dangote: “We didn’t want to go into retail. It was during the time we were building this refinery that they sold Mobil, AP, and Oando. We could have bought them, the three of them didn’t cost 500 million. “If we knew this was going to happen, maybe we would have done it the other way. But we didn’t want to be called a monopoly, that’s why we left that side. Restrict ourselves to production, they will become our customers, and we will have a nice party together. But if they are looking for fights, I have been fighting all my life.”

Imran Muhammad

642,596 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

This family booked a child’s birthday party at this water park for 200 people. Then they advertised it on social media and was selling tickets to their event at this park. The park caught wind of what they were doing and cancelled their event due to over 500 people showing up for an event booked only for 250 people. Was this fair or was it another motive involved? I can’t blame them especially if they aren’t equipped to handle that many people. In college we used to always go to this bar after class late at night around 10pm. That night a friend’s band was supposed to be playing there and we helped sell tickets for the event. There ended up being a misunderstanding, the bar said there was a max occupancy of 200 people, so the band assumed they could have sold 200 tickets. We sold all of the tickets, when we got there over 40 people were already there as part of the normal crowd. So it all 200 people show up that bought tickets there would be an issue as it would exceed occupancy. The bar owner was getting antsy because he didn’t want any issues if he exceeded occupancy and was in the verge of canceling the show. The band and the owner engaged in a heated argument and the band said the way he said it, he was implying it could be 200 people and that he should only have let people in that had tickets considering it was an event. The owner argued back saying and he quoted himself that the max occupancy was 200 and that he never gave the band a number for how many tickets that could have been sold. I think they could have both handled the details much better and they were both in the wrong. The show ended up getting canceled because of how many people was continuing to show up due to his cheap drink specials he always has that night.

This family booked a child’s birthday party at this water park for 200 people. Then they advertised it on social media and was selling tickets to their event at this park. The park caught wind of what they were doing and cancelled their event due to over 500 people showing up for an event booked only for 250 people. Was this fair or was it another motive involved? I can’t blame them especially if they aren’t equipped to handle that many people. In college we used to always go to this bar after class late at night around 10pm. That night a friend’s band was supposed to be playing there and we helped sell tickets for the event. There ended up being a misunderstanding, the bar said there was a max occupancy of 200 people, so the band assumed they could have sold 200 tickets. We sold all of the tickets, when we got there over 40 people were already there as part of the normal crowd. So it all 200 people show up that bought tickets there would be an issue as it would exceed occupancy. The bar owner was getting antsy because he didn’t want any issues if he exceeded occupancy and was in the verge of canceling the show. The band and the owner engaged in a heated argument and the band said the way he said it, he was implying it could be 200 people and that he should only have let people in that had tickets considering it was an event. The owner argued back saying and he quoted himself that the max occupancy was 200 and that he never gave the band a number for how many tickets that could have been sold. I think they could have both handled the details much better and they were both in the wrong. The show ended up getting canceled because of how many people was continuing to show up due to his cheap drink specials he always has that night.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,512,307 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

My cousins and my brother and I were exploring Coney Island, we saw the sights, hung out at the arcades and before we went back to the apartment we decided to go and get something to eat, we had some money on us but not much so we decided to see what we could get at one of the vendors. This was back in the early 90’s when most of them had dollar slices of pizza wherever we went. So we got 4 pieces of pizza, should have been $4 because that’s the price we were used to. The guy wanted to charge us $24 at $6 a slice. We argues with him because one of my cousins already took a bite being so hungry. But at the least we owed $4. We gave the other slices back and refused them but had to pay for the partially eaten one, it was embarrassing that an adult would try that on a bunch of kids. We told our uncle what happened and he went back and yelled at the vendor. He was familiar with them because he used to get slices all the time from the same guy and he never charged my uncle that price. I couldn’t imagine paying that exurban amount, like this guy who was being charged $54 for a hotdog by one of the vendors. At first he thought it was a typo and it was $5.40 but the vendor. Learned it up when he said no it was $54. Would you have paid that amount? I would have walked away, clearly he was trying to possibly scam a the man for looking like a tourist. Part of the experience when visiting a new area is the street food but it’s becoming more and more a chore avoiding places like this.

My cousins and my brother and I were exploring Coney Island, we saw the sights, hung out at the arcades and before we went back to the apartment we decided to go and get something to eat, we had some money on us but not much so we decided to see what we could get at one of the vendors. This was back in the early 90’s when most of them had dollar slices of pizza wherever we went. So we got 4 pieces of pizza, should have been $4 because that’s the price we were used to. The guy wanted to charge us $24 at $6 a slice. We argues with him because one of my cousins already took a bite being so hungry. But at the least we owed $4. We gave the other slices back and refused them but had to pay for the partially eaten one, it was embarrassing that an adult would try that on a bunch of kids. We told our uncle what happened and he went back and yelled at the vendor. He was familiar with them because he used to get slices all the time from the same guy and he never charged my uncle that price. I couldn’t imagine paying that exurban amount, like this guy who was being charged $54 for a hotdog by one of the vendors. At first he thought it was a typo and it was $5.40 but the vendor. Learned it up when he said no it was $54. Would you have paid that amount? I would have walked away, clearly he was trying to possibly scam a the man for looking like a tourist. Part of the experience when visiting a new area is the street food but it’s becoming more and more a chore avoiding places like this.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

362,822 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Keir Starmer, "On Brexit, the reason I reminded everyone of what Nigel Farage said was because that was the promise he put to the country" "That we'd be stronger, we'd be richer, we'd have lots of money for the NHS, immigration will come down" "It all proved to be false" "Farage is not going back to the country now and saying it was a good thing, you've all benefited" "Farage will talk about almost anything else apart from the consequences of the one thing he delivered for the country, Brexit" "Farage doesn't want to talk about it, and there's a reason for that, it didn't help working people" "It turns out what he said wasn't true" "That's why Farage doesn't want to talk about Brexit" "But we have to talk about it now because we have to address the situation we are in" "We have to give this country a stronger economy, a stronger defence and security arrangement given the world we live in" "That's why I said what I said about being closer to Europe" "And this government being defined by bringing Europe back together and the UK at the heart of Europe"

Keir Starmer, "On Brexit, the reason I reminded everyone of what Nigel Farage said was because that was the promise he put to the country" "That we'd be stronger, we'd be richer, we'd have lots of money for the NHS, immigration will come down" "It all proved to be false" "Farage is not going back to the country now and saying it was a good thing, you've all benefited" "Farage will talk about almost anything else apart from the consequences of the one thing he delivered for the country, Brexit" "Farage doesn't want to talk about it, and there's a reason for that, it didn't help working people" "It turns out what he said wasn't true" "That's why Farage doesn't want to talk about Brexit" "But we have to talk about it now because we have to address the situation we are in" "We have to give this country a stronger economy, a stronger defence and security arrangement given the world we live in" "That's why I said what I said about being closer to Europe" "And this government being defined by bringing Europe back together and the UK at the heart of Europe"

Farrukh

151,685 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Brian Cashman is asked how aggressively the Yankees pursued a shortstop on the trade market: "We tried to evaluate all opportunities on the marketplace...with that being said, I don't think there were lots of opportunities that existed that were upgrades for us. We like the players that we have, and we like the players that we have on the come. Did we look to upgrade, engage on infield opportunities?...there was nothing we were able to find there. It was going to be a high bar. We do think that we have the players, overall, that can compete for a championship. We're happy that we were able to bring in Ramos and Garcia to solve some of the problems. We're looking forward now to getting the other guys back from the IL, to fortify and finish this off super-charged."

Brian Cashman is asked how aggressively the Yankees pursued a shortstop on the trade market: "We tried to evaluate all opportunities on the marketplace...with that being said, I don't think there were lots of opportunities that existed that were upgrades for us. We like the players that we have, and we like the players that we have on the come. Did we look to upgrade, engage on infield opportunities?...there was nothing we were able to find there. It was going to be a high bar. We do think that we have the players, overall, that can compete for a championship. We're happy that we were able to bring in Ramos and Garcia to solve some of the problems. We're looking forward now to getting the other guys back from the IL, to fortify and finish this off super-charged."

SNY Yankees

76,202 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This man was supposed to be watching his parents home while the were away. He didn’t think it would be a huge deal or maybe he just didn’t take it seriously enough. He locked up and didn’t come back for a few days. When he came back, he panicked, the whole house was flooded due to a pipe burst, there was drywall falling from the ceilings. Every inch of carpet was soaked. Needless to say his parents aren’t going to ask him to house sit anymore, has this ever happened to you, what would you do if you came back to this?

This man was supposed to be watching his parents home while the were away. He didn’t think it would be a huge deal or maybe he just didn’t take it seriously enough. He locked up and didn’t come back for a few days. When he came back, he panicked, the whole house was flooded due to a pipe burst, there was drywall falling from the ceilings. Every inch of carpet was soaked. Needless to say his parents aren’t going to ask him to house sit anymore, has this ever happened to you, what would you do if you came back to this?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

164,310 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Roseanne speaks on the Great Awakening and the Plandemic: "They put us into quarantine that was the best thing that ever happened to this country, although a lot of people lost their jobs, the greatest thing about it was that it broke the routine. That's one way to snap out of mind control. It woke people up to what mattered. And then they got on the internet and started looking for answers. And that's why they call it the Great Awakening. That's what Q was for quarantine. We all got a lot smarter, we all got a lot healthier, we all got a lot closer. It was the best thing that could have happened to us. Because anything that these people at the top try to do to us is going to end up working for our benefit as long as we reclaim our humanity and our love and our connection for each other. They can't hurt us."

Roseanne speaks on the Great Awakening and the Plandemic: "They put us into quarantine that was the best thing that ever happened to this country, although a lot of people lost their jobs, the greatest thing about it was that it broke the routine. That's one way to snap out of mind control. It woke people up to what mattered. And then they got on the internet and started looking for answers. And that's why they call it the Great Awakening. That's what Q was for quarantine. We all got a lot smarter, we all got a lot healthier, we all got a lot closer. It was the best thing that could have happened to us. Because anything that these people at the top try to do to us is going to end up working for our benefit as long as we reclaim our humanity and our love and our connection for each other. They can't hurt us."

Green Lives Matter

484,946 просмотров • 3 лет назад

I remember taking a trip to Florida in my teens. We were sightseeing , new to the area. I was just enjoying the sun and the warm weather for once, I didn’t expect to see anything out of the ordinary. It finally hit me as we were enjoying a drink on the water, we see what looks like a floating log. Our friend who owned the boat said to keep our eyes open and don’t freak out, as long as we were in the boat we were fine. Just hearing that alone was almost panic inducing because he didn’t tell us what we were supposed to be careful of. When the “log drifted under the water, I finally understood what it was that we were looking at. Our friend had us piled in a boat on water infested with these gators. Being from up north, we didn’t see much of this. It made me believe I was in my own movie but I was going to be okay, I thought to myself if it was truly dangerous, our friend wouldn’t have brought us out there right? I stayed calm though, I never knew you could fish in areas that had gators, I assumed they would always go after your bait. All in all I would do it again, but I would never have taken anyone in the water and not tell them about the inhabitants, just in case they have a real phobia. Like I would never take my kids in there in case one panics and falls in. But looking back I’m thinking he may have been in the wrong for taking us there, would you take your friends in an area infested with these creatures not knowing? It’s a little messed up in my opinion but I’m over it.

I remember taking a trip to Florida in my teens. We were sightseeing , new to the area. I was just enjoying the sun and the warm weather for once, I didn’t expect to see anything out of the ordinary. It finally hit me as we were enjoying a drink on the water, we see what looks like a floating log. Our friend who owned the boat said to keep our eyes open and don’t freak out, as long as we were in the boat we were fine. Just hearing that alone was almost panic inducing because he didn’t tell us what we were supposed to be careful of. When the “log drifted under the water, I finally understood what it was that we were looking at. Our friend had us piled in a boat on water infested with these gators. Being from up north, we didn’t see much of this. It made me believe I was in my own movie but I was going to be okay, I thought to myself if it was truly dangerous, our friend wouldn’t have brought us out there right? I stayed calm though, I never knew you could fish in areas that had gators, I assumed they would always go after your bait. All in all I would do it again, but I would never have taken anyone in the water and not tell them about the inhabitants, just in case they have a real phobia. Like I would never take my kids in there in case one panics and falls in. But looking back I’m thinking he may have been in the wrong for taking us there, would you take your friends in an area infested with these creatures not knowing? It’s a little messed up in my opinion but I’m over it.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

64,473 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Julius Erving talking about playing with Charles Barkley: “I kept seeing his upside. He was hard-headed. He had something to say about everything. If he didn’t play as good as he can and well as he was capable of playing or whatever, then some of the things he did wouldn’t be tolerated. But they were tolerated because, you know, he was exceptional, man. He could rebound it, take it coast to coast, make play. And for his height to rebound the way that he did, it was incredible. It was kind of disruptive because we had won the championship the year before he got there. Then the year that he got there. We had to make room for him and he almost killed Marc Iavaroni cuz he was playing the four, Charles was like that’s my spot right there. This going back to violence in the game because the next man up. Me and you man. He get Iavaroni at his back. He back him all the way out to the top of the key” (Via All the Smoke)

Julius Erving talking about playing with Charles Barkley: “I kept seeing his upside. He was hard-headed. He had something to say about everything. If he didn’t play as good as he can and well as he was capable of playing or whatever, then some of the things he did wouldn’t be tolerated. But they were tolerated because, you know, he was exceptional, man. He could rebound it, take it coast to coast, make play. And for his height to rebound the way that he did, it was incredible. It was kind of disruptive because we had won the championship the year before he got there. Then the year that he got there. We had to make room for him and he almost killed Marc Iavaroni cuz he was playing the four, Charles was like that’s my spot right there. This going back to violence in the game because the next man up. Me and you man. He get Iavaroni at his back. He back him all the way out to the top of the key” (Via All the Smoke)

NBA Courtside

38,407 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Newsom: He basically took water that was set aside for this summer’s farming from one part of Central Valley and dumped it into another part—without giving them a heads-up—on water they didn’t need and didn’t even know how to store. They had to turn off the pump because it was starting to impact the levees. None of it went to Southern California. But what Donald Trump did was flood the zone with disinformation and misinformation, celebrating as if he somehow solved the problems in Southern California—somehow equating it to fire hoses and fire suppression. And again, facts get in the way. Narrative matters. Illusion so often rules. The challenge we have—and you know this—is that they dominate right now by flooding the zone and weaponizing misinformation and disinformation. They do it with an asymmetry in communication capacity that we have to address. You are addressing it, and we have to own up to it. We’ve got to build that architecture so we can compete in this space. Because what you just said is not commonly known by the overwhelming majority of people who voted for Donald Trump—people who actually believe that water was sent to Southern California, even though we know that demonstrably was not the case.

Newsom: He basically took water that was set aside for this summer’s farming from one part of Central Valley and dumped it into another part—without giving them a heads-up—on water they didn’t need and didn’t even know how to store. They had to turn off the pump because it was starting to impact the levees. None of it went to Southern California. But what Donald Trump did was flood the zone with disinformation and misinformation, celebrating as if he somehow solved the problems in Southern California—somehow equating it to fire hoses and fire suppression. And again, facts get in the way. Narrative matters. Illusion so often rules. The challenge we have—and you know this—is that they dominate right now by flooding the zone and weaponizing misinformation and disinformation. They do it with an asymmetry in communication capacity that we have to address. You are addressing it, and we have to own up to it. We’ve got to build that architecture so we can compete in this space. Because what you just said is not commonly known by the overwhelming majority of people who voted for Donald Trump—people who actually believe that water was sent to Southern California, even though we know that demonstrably was not the case.

Acyn

316,744 просмотров • 1 год назад

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen: The discussions focused on how to ensure long-term security in Greenland. And here, our perspectives continue to differ, I must say. The President has made his view clear, and we have a different position. It’s not resolved. We didn’t manage it. But, honestly speaking, I didn’t believe that was doable. We didn’t manage to change the American position. It’s clear that the President has this wish of conquering Greenland. We made it very, very clear that this is not in the interest of the Kingdom. For us, ideas that would not respect the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark and the right of self-determination of the Greenlandic people are, of course, totally unacceptable. Therefore, we still have a fundamental disagreement, but we also agree to disagree. We will, however, continue to talk. We have decided to form a high-level working group to explore whether we can find a common way forward. And we want to work closely with the U.S., but it must, of course, be a respectful kind of cooperation.

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen: The discussions focused on how to ensure long-term security in Greenland. And here, our perspectives continue to differ, I must say. The President has made his view clear, and we have a different position. It’s not resolved. We didn’t manage it. But, honestly speaking, I didn’t believe that was doable. We didn’t manage to change the American position. It’s clear that the President has this wish of conquering Greenland. We made it very, very clear that this is not in the interest of the Kingdom. For us, ideas that would not respect the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark and the right of self-determination of the Greenlandic people are, of course, totally unacceptable. Therefore, we still have a fundamental disagreement, but we also agree to disagree. We will, however, continue to talk. We have decided to form a high-level working group to explore whether we can find a common way forward. And we want to work closely with the U.S., but it must, of course, be a respectful kind of cooperation.

Anton Gerashchenko

108,201 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

As the meeting wrapped up, Trump made one final point—and reminded everyone who held the leverage. A reporter asked, “Are you prepared to walk away from that pact?” Trump replied, “From what pact?” “USMCA,” the reporter clarified. Trump responded calmly but clearly: “No. No, it’s fine. It’s there. It’s good. We use it for certain things,” he said, gesturing toward Carney. “The USMCA’s a good deal for everybody.” Then he pivoted—and delivered a pointed message. “I won’t say this about Mark, but I didn’t like his predecessor,” Trump said. “I didn’t like a person that worked for him, she was terrible, actually. She was a terrible person. And she really hurt that deal very badly because she tried to take advantage of the deal and she didn’t get away with it.” “You know who I’m talking about?” “We had a bad relationship having to do with the fact that we disagreed with the way they viewed the deal, and we ended it… we ended that relationship pretty much.” This was Trump living out another one of his core principles: fight back when treated unfairly—and don’t forget who tried to take advantage. Then he gave Carney a final reminder: “We do have a negotiation coming over the next year or so to adjust or terminate it.” The message was unmistakable. It wasn’t just a meeting. It was The Art of the Deal—live and in real time.

As the meeting wrapped up, Trump made one final point—and reminded everyone who held the leverage. A reporter asked, “Are you prepared to walk away from that pact?” Trump replied, “From what pact?” “USMCA,” the reporter clarified. Trump responded calmly but clearly: “No. No, it’s fine. It’s there. It’s good. We use it for certain things,” he said, gesturing toward Carney. “The USMCA’s a good deal for everybody.” Then he pivoted—and delivered a pointed message. “I won’t say this about Mark, but I didn’t like his predecessor,” Trump said. “I didn’t like a person that worked for him, she was terrible, actually. She was a terrible person. And she really hurt that deal very badly because she tried to take advantage of the deal and she didn’t get away with it.” “You know who I’m talking about?” “We had a bad relationship having to do with the fact that we disagreed with the way they viewed the deal, and we ended it… we ended that relationship pretty much.” This was Trump living out another one of his core principles: fight back when treated unfairly—and don’t forget who tried to take advantage. Then he gave Carney a final reminder: “We do have a negotiation coming over the next year or so to adjust or terminate it.” The message was unmistakable. It wasn’t just a meeting. It was The Art of the Deal—live and in real time.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

647,044 просмотров • 1 год назад

The Michele Tafoya Psyop — Are people really going to keep pretending with the county on the line, Michele didn't say "let's get back to normal", in reference to begging President Trump not to run again. What normal would that be Michele? Normal was corruption, normal was the status quo, normal was a dying nation. Normal was the Koch brothers and all the other special interests or lobbies. Normal was unacceptable, we don't need normal ever again, until normal is America 1st. It's just an embarrassment what has happened to America, Minnesota and maybe most of all Minnesota "conservatives", what have you conserved? What is "get back to normal" exactly Michele? I'll tell you "get back to normal" means the machine is about to test if Americans will fall for a semi well known face and name, from the sports world, to pull the Overton Window back to the center. I wouldn't be surprised if they used Minnesota, the cultural epicenter of American politics, to do just that and rig it for Michele. We all know she won't fight the power. Again, she BEGGED President Trump not to run in 2024. What are we even talking about? I'll be here whenever America is serious about saving this great country from dastardly, feckless, puppet politicians. We all know what needs to be done... question is do we have the fucking balls to do it. SECURE ELECTIONS MASS DEPORTATIONS TERM LIMTS BAN SHARIA & MARXISM BAN PACs & LOBBIES Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 Vote Primary August 11th

The Michele Tafoya Psyop — Are people really going to keep pretending with the county on the line, Michele didn't say "let's get back to normal", in reference to begging President Trump not to run again. What normal would that be Michele? Normal was corruption, normal was the status quo, normal was a dying nation. Normal was the Koch brothers and all the other special interests or lobbies. Normal was unacceptable, we don't need normal ever again, until normal is America 1st. It's just an embarrassment what has happened to America, Minnesota and maybe most of all Minnesota "conservatives", what have you conserved? What is "get back to normal" exactly Michele? I'll tell you "get back to normal" means the machine is about to test if Americans will fall for a semi well known face and name, from the sports world, to pull the Overton Window back to the center. I wouldn't be surprised if they used Minnesota, the cultural epicenter of American politics, to do just that and rig it for Michele. We all know she won't fight the power. Again, she BEGGED President Trump not to run in 2024. What are we even talking about? I'll be here whenever America is serious about saving this great country from dastardly, feckless, puppet politicians. We all know what needs to be done... question is do we have the fucking balls to do it. SECURE ELECTIONS MASS DEPORTATIONS TERM LIMTS BAN SHARIA & MARXISM BAN PACs & LOBBIES Royce White for U.S. Senate MN 2026 Vote Primary August 11th

Royce White 🇺🇸

84,658 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Matt Damon reveals he didn’t know that Agamemnon and an army of 750 people were behind the Gates Of Troy “i have to say the moment that we opened the gates of troy, we didn’t know that agamemnon and an army of 750 people were on the other side” “we just thought we were taking it to the opening of the door and we opened the door, and i’ll never forget seeing benny in that costume standing in the middle” “and it looked like it was benny and 20 guys because it was dark behind them and then this roar and 500 people came running”

Matt Damon reveals he didn’t know that Agamemnon and an army of 750 people were behind the Gates Of Troy “i have to say the moment that we opened the gates of troy, we didn’t know that agamemnon and an army of 750 people were on the other side” “we just thought we were taking it to the opening of the door and we opened the door, and i’ll never forget seeing benny in that costume standing in the middle” “and it looked like it was benny and 20 guys because it was dark behind them and then this roar and 500 people came running”

chris

1,692,802 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

One of the most astonishing attempts at projecting grandiose delusions I’ve ever seen—“so [Obama] tried to bribe them to make a deal… 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing…” Trump bribed Iran with $324 billion. And got nothing for it. “And the main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. They fully agreed to that with strong policing powers, and they won't have nuclear weapons, which is what I was all about, because they probably would have used it if they had it. So we had two big moments when they terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barrack Hussein Obama deal, and when I terminated that, it was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran. It was a deal where 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing 7, well, not a 7, 7, 57, I guess, right? But it was put on a big, beautiful Boeing 757. They needed a Boeing 747 to be honest with you, because it was a lot of cash. 1.7 billion was taken out of the banks and given to Iran, and on top of that, tens of billions of dollars was made. So they tried to bribe them to make a deal that didn't work. It never works. And that we lived on a great job, and hopefully it's going to be a good relationship, and we're going to get along. And if we don't, we go back to where we started, but I don't know if it's going to be necessary. The Iran deal that we made is going to bring a lot of success to the world, because the oil was really plugged up there for a while. They would call me on occasion, "See, come on, please. Let's go." The oil prices. But the oil is coming way down.”

One of the most astonishing attempts at projecting grandiose delusions I’ve ever seen—“so [Obama] tried to bribe them to make a deal… 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing…” Trump bribed Iran with $324 billion. And got nothing for it. “And the main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. They fully agreed to that with strong policing powers, and they won't have nuclear weapons, which is what I was all about, because they probably would have used it if they had it. So we had two big moments when they terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barrack Hussein Obama deal, and when I terminated that, it was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran. It was a deal where 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing 7, well, not a 7, 7, 57, I guess, right? But it was put on a big, beautiful Boeing 757. They needed a Boeing 747 to be honest with you, because it was a lot of cash. 1.7 billion was taken out of the banks and given to Iran, and on top of that, tens of billions of dollars was made. So they tried to bribe them to make a deal that didn't work. It never works. And that we lived on a great job, and hopefully it's going to be a good relationship, and we're going to get along. And if we don't, we go back to where we started, but I don't know if it's going to be necessary. The Iran deal that we made is going to bring a lot of success to the world, because the oil was really plugged up there for a while. They would call me on occasion, "See, come on, please. Let's go." The oil prices. But the oil is coming way down.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

31,475 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад