Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

If Hon. Joel Ssenyonyi is reflecting on current events, one thought could be ringing louder than ever. "Had I known Tabz would also be arrested after Lukwago’s remand to Luzira, perhaps I wouldn’t have publicly labeled Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba a ‘madman’." 🤔 But beyond the political drama, Ssenyonyi made...

GladysNanyanzi's profile picture

Nanyanzi Gladys

5,940 subscribers

49,628 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Uganda Police Force’s credibility has once again been called into question, this time amid alarming threats from President Museveni’s son, Muhoozi Kainerugaba. In a move that has intensified public scrutiny, police spokesperson Kituuma Rusoke claimed that opposition leader Bobi Wine was at his residence and not under house arrest, adding that if he were to be arrested, the police would publicly disclose the alleged crimes he had committed. Shortly after, Muhoozi Kainerugaba took to his Twitter account, Muhoozi Engaged, issuing a stark warning: Bobi Wine must surrender to the authorities or be treated as a rebel and outlaw. The tweet, delivered in his trademark threatening style, has amplified fears and tensions across the country. This sequence of events raises a troubling question: if Bobi Wine has committed no crime, why is he being ordered to surrender? The situation underscores the continued aggressive posture of Uganda’s security apparatus and highlights the precarious position of opposition figures in a climate where dissent appears to be met with intimidation rather than due process. YouTube -
13:29

The Uganda Police Force’s credibility has once again been called into question, this time amid alarming threats from President Museveni’s son, Muhoozi Kainerugaba. In a move that has intensified public scrutiny, police spokesperson Kituuma Rusoke claimed that opposition leader Bobi Wine was at his residence and not under house arrest, adding that if he were to be arrested, the police would publicly disclose the alleged crimes he had committed. Shortly after, Muhoozi Kainerugaba took to his Twitter account, Muhoozi Engaged, issuing a stark warning: Bobi Wine must surrender to the authorities or be treated as a rebel and outlaw. The tweet, delivered in his trademark threatening style, has amplified fears and tensions across the country. This sequence of events raises a troubling question: if Bobi Wine has committed no crime, why is he being ordered to surrender? The situation underscores the continued aggressive posture of Uganda’s security apparatus and highlights the precarious position of opposition figures in a climate where dissent appears to be met with intimidation rather than due process. YouTube -

Mordecai Muriisa ™️

52,650 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Amp CEO, Quinn Slack on why he thinks Kimi K3 could be a Sputnik moment for America: "With GLM 5.2 we had a mini Sputnik moment. When the Soviet Union launched a satellite into space before the US and we realized we have to catch up." "Kimi K3 I need to go and see, but that could be an even bigger Sputnik moment that wakes us up and will probably create a lot of good effects in terms of catalyzing the understanding of AI as a strategic advantage for the US rather than as something people should be against." "But I think it could also scare a lot of people, and I can understand why they'd be scared." "The worst possible outcome could be that open models are banned or are banned from certain industries or companies in the US. There's a lot of people in lobbying organizations in Washington DC, and a lot of people in various parts of the government that want to do that." "They want to say, we won't let these models trained in China be used in the US. There's a lot of people trying to do that now, and that would make us all worse off. I'm pretty nervous about that." Quinn Slack Amp
1:26

Amp CEO, Quinn Slack on why he thinks Kimi K3 could be a Sputnik moment for America: "With GLM 5.2 we had a mini Sputnik moment. When the Soviet Union launched a satellite into space before the US and we realized we have to catch up." "Kimi K3 I need to go and see, but that could be an even bigger Sputnik moment that wakes us up and will probably create a lot of good effects in terms of catalyzing the understanding of AI as a strategic advantage for the US rather than as something people should be against." "But I think it could also scare a lot of people, and I can understand why they'd be scared." "The worst possible outcome could be that open models are banned or are banned from certain industries or companies in the US. There's a lot of people in lobbying organizations in Washington DC, and a lot of people in various parts of the government that want to do that." "They want to say, we won't let these models trained in China be used in the US. There's a lot of people trying to do that now, and that would make us all worse off. I'm pretty nervous about that." Quinn Slack Amp

MTS

58,660 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ALAS, THE WORST FEARS APPEAR TO BE COMING TRUE. THERE APPEARS TO BE A SCAM IN THE NAME OF RAM LALLA. AND HERE'S WHY IT IS MORE THAN AN ACT OF CRIMINAL IMPROPRIETY. The latest is that the SIT is preparing legal action against Champat Rai aide Tinnu Yadav in the Ram Mandir donation theft probe, sources say. Cases may also be registered against donation-counting staff and bank officials. Arrests are possible. Complainant Anil Mishra alleges no receipt was issued for donated gold and claims he was later told the gold had already been melted down. It is deeply painful to be reporting these details. The Ram Mandir isn't just a bricks-and-mortar tribute to a deity. It is much more than that. It is a symbol that consecrates the reclamation of Hindu civilizational heritage. A heritage that was first endangered by settler colonisation and later by a political ideology that wrongly portrayed any attempt to reclaim or appreciate the grandeur of Hindu civilization as an assault on secularism. That is precisely why these allegations are so troubling. One would have thought that the symbols of this great project to reclaim Hindu heritage would have been safest in the hands of those who led the movement. It is now incumbent upon these self-styled "guardians of the faith" to prove themselves by ensuring they do not become complicit in the very acts of vandalism and desecration they have long fought against.
0:31

ALAS, THE WORST FEARS APPEAR TO BE COMING TRUE. THERE APPEARS TO BE A SCAM IN THE NAME OF RAM LALLA. AND HERE'S WHY IT IS MORE THAN AN ACT OF CRIMINAL IMPROPRIETY. The latest is that the SIT is preparing legal action against Champat Rai aide Tinnu Yadav in the Ram Mandir donation theft probe, sources say. Cases may also be registered against donation-counting staff and bank officials. Arrests are possible. Complainant Anil Mishra alleges no receipt was issued for donated gold and claims he was later told the gold had already been melted down. It is deeply painful to be reporting these details. The Ram Mandir isn't just a bricks-and-mortar tribute to a deity. It is much more than that. It is a symbol that consecrates the reclamation of Hindu civilizational heritage. A heritage that was first endangered by settler colonisation and later by a political ideology that wrongly portrayed any attempt to reclaim or appreciate the grandeur of Hindu civilization as an assault on secularism. That is precisely why these allegations are so troubling. One would have thought that the symbols of this great project to reclaim Hindu heritage would have been safest in the hands of those who led the movement. It is now incumbent upon these self-styled "guardians of the faith" to prove themselves by ensuring they do not become complicit in the very acts of vandalism and desecration they have long fought against.

Rahul Shivshankar

238,619 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein
2:10

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

696,713 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BREAKING: Andrew and Tristan Tate Charged After a 15-month-long investigation. The charges against them include: - Rape - Human trafficking - Formation of an organized crime group The allegations claim the Tates formed an organized criminal group in Romania, the US, the UK and other countries to recruit girls by promising them love/marriage, then placing them under constant surveillance/control & forcing them into the porn industry. The trial will not start immediately and is expected to take several years MY THOUGHTS: Tate was arrested days before a scheduled interview we had in Dubai. We did a space as soon as he was arrested and the consensus by most panelists was that they are 'most likely guilty' We came to this conclusion based on a narrative built around Tate, mainly from things he said, generally taken out of context. However, over the past few months, while the Tates were being held without bail, we started seeing all the evidence getting 'leaked'. I will make a thread on this one day, but to say the evidence is 'underwhelming' is an understatement. This doesn't mean there isn't evidence I haven't seen, but suffice to say, I don't trust the Romanian legal system. On June 29th, Tristan announced that he would be allowed to discuss the "evidence" against him, something that both brothers were not allowed to do. My position is simple: If the allegations are true, they should be jailed. If the allegations are false, they should be freed. But, will they get a fair trial? Do you think the Tates are guilty, or the victims of corruption?
0:32

BREAKING: Andrew and Tristan Tate Charged After a 15-month-long investigation. The charges against them include: - Rape - Human trafficking - Formation of an organized crime group The allegations claim the Tates formed an organized criminal group in Romania, the US, the UK and other countries to recruit girls by promising them love/marriage, then placing them under constant surveillance/control & forcing them into the porn industry. The trial will not start immediately and is expected to take several years MY THOUGHTS: Tate was arrested days before a scheduled interview we had in Dubai. We did a space as soon as he was arrested and the consensus by most panelists was that they are 'most likely guilty' We came to this conclusion based on a narrative built around Tate, mainly from things he said, generally taken out of context. However, over the past few months, while the Tates were being held without bail, we started seeing all the evidence getting 'leaked'. I will make a thread on this one day, but to say the evidence is 'underwhelming' is an understatement. This doesn't mean there isn't evidence I haven't seen, but suffice to say, I don't trust the Romanian legal system. On June 29th, Tristan announced that he would be allowed to discuss the "evidence" against him, something that both brothers were not allowed to do. My position is simple: If the allegations are true, they should be jailed. If the allegations are false, they should be freed. But, will they get a fair trial? Do you think the Tates are guilty, or the victims of corruption?

Mario Nawfal

9,857,561 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

A serious allegation of misconduct has surfaced in Bengaluru, where a woman has filed a complaint against a police inspector accusing him of harassment through repeated calls and messages. The complaint has been submitted to the city’s Police Commissioner, along with alleged audio clips and WhatsApp chat records as evidence. The accused officer, identified as Inspector Papanna, is currently posted at Konanakunte Police Station. The complainant, Yashaswini, has alleged that the inspector has been sending her inappropriate messages and making persistent calls over the past three months. According to the complaint, the messages allegedly contained personal and suggestive remarks, including requests to meet, hug, and kiss, which made the woman uncomfortable. She claims that despite blocking his number, the inspector continued to contact her using different phone numbers. The complainant further stated that the alleged harassment dates back several years when the officer was posted in Basavanagudi. She claims he had obtained her number during that time and had been attempting to contact her intermittently since then. In her complaint, Yashaswini has also alleged that the officer made statements suggesting that no action could be taken against him due to his alleged political connections. These claims, however, are yet to be independently verified. Police officials have acknowledged receiving the complaint and are expected to initiate an internal inquiry into the matter. Senior officials have assured that appropriate action will be taken based on the findings of the investigation. The case has raised concerns about accountability and conduct within law enforcement agencies. Allegations involving misuse of authority and harassment are treated seriously, and due process is expected to follow. It is important to note that these are allegations at this stage, and the accused officer has not yet publicly responded to the claims. Authorities will examine the evidence, including the submitted audio recordings and chat logs, before arriving at any conclusions. The incident highlights the need for strict adherence to professional ethics within the police force and the importance of ensuring that complaints of harassment are addressed promptly and transparently.
7:13

A serious allegation of misconduct has surfaced in Bengaluru, where a woman has filed a complaint against a police inspector accusing him of harassment through repeated calls and messages. The complaint has been submitted to the city’s Police Commissioner, along with alleged audio clips and WhatsApp chat records as evidence. The accused officer, identified as Inspector Papanna, is currently posted at Konanakunte Police Station. The complainant, Yashaswini, has alleged that the inspector has been sending her inappropriate messages and making persistent calls over the past three months. According to the complaint, the messages allegedly contained personal and suggestive remarks, including requests to meet, hug, and kiss, which made the woman uncomfortable. She claims that despite blocking his number, the inspector continued to contact her using different phone numbers. The complainant further stated that the alleged harassment dates back several years when the officer was posted in Basavanagudi. She claims he had obtained her number during that time and had been attempting to contact her intermittently since then. In her complaint, Yashaswini has also alleged that the officer made statements suggesting that no action could be taken against him due to his alleged political connections. These claims, however, are yet to be independently verified. Police officials have acknowledged receiving the complaint and are expected to initiate an internal inquiry into the matter. Senior officials have assured that appropriate action will be taken based on the findings of the investigation. The case has raised concerns about accountability and conduct within law enforcement agencies. Allegations involving misuse of authority and harassment are treated seriously, and due process is expected to follow. It is important to note that these are allegations at this stage, and the accused officer has not yet publicly responded to the claims. Authorities will examine the evidence, including the submitted audio recordings and chat logs, before arriving at any conclusions. The incident highlights the need for strict adherence to professional ethics within the police force and the importance of ensuring that complaints of harassment are addressed promptly and transparently.

Hate Detector 🔍

14,878 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jeffrey Epstein was sent a photo of a 10-year-old and a photo of an 11-year-old. The sender of both photos is redacted. I understand personal info like email addresses, residential addresses, and phone numbers were redacted. But we need to know the identity of this person or persons. Some way. Somehow. If you make a comment like this to Jeffrey Epstein, your name needs to be publicly known. I’ve seen theories online that the sender was a victim too. Well, we would need evidence of that, otherwise there is simply no excuse for that name to be redacted. We have to know these people's names if we want to. If we want to pursue justice, we have to know these people's names. We need to know whether or not he was held to a different standard of justice than you or I would have been. Because we're interested in whether his rich and powerful political connections, domestically and internationally, provided protection for him when his crimes were exposed.
2:11

Jeffrey Epstein was sent a photo of a 10-year-old and a photo of an 11-year-old. The sender of both photos is redacted. I understand personal info like email addresses, residential addresses, and phone numbers were redacted. But we need to know the identity of this person or persons. Some way. Somehow. If you make a comment like this to Jeffrey Epstein, your name needs to be publicly known. I’ve seen theories online that the sender was a victim too. Well, we would need evidence of that, otherwise there is simply no excuse for that name to be redacted. We have to know these people's names if we want to. If we want to pursue justice, we have to know these people's names. We need to know whether or not he was held to a different standard of justice than you or I would have been. Because we're interested in whether his rich and powerful political connections, domestically and internationally, provided protection for him when his crimes were exposed.

Liz Wheeler

184,886 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: "... The LoP has made his point, and I think the government should respond...," says Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, on Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi's allegations that LoP is not allowed to meet visiting dignitaries. He also says, "In a democracy, it would be nice that the visiting dignitaries meet everyone... I think this is an important visit, and in our country, without doubt, many important bilateral relations need to be maintained- with Russia, China, and the US. We cannot accept a proposition that one relationship has to be determined by the nature of another relationship. We should have sovereign autonomy, actually, to decide the terms of our own engagement. Its in that spirit I beleive that we have maintained good relations with Russia, US, and China, at different times and a different emphasis. A lot of talks have already taken place at the expert level to work out some possible agreements that might be signed when President Putin is here, and that would be very valuable for us... Defence cooperation has been very important. We already saw the utility of the S-400 air defence system during Operation Sindoor. There are now discussions of more S-400, or maybe even S-500... There is a possibility of a mobility agreement for our workers. We don't want a situation where our people go for one thing and end up being pressured into the Army. There should be some formal agreement about how these things happen. There is no doubt that there is a lot to be discussed, and I am convinced that our Prime Minister and President Putin will have a good conversation... The LoP has made his point, and I think the government should respond..."
2:48

#WATCH | Delhi: "... The LoP has made his point, and I think the government should respond...," says Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, on Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi's allegations that LoP is not allowed to meet visiting dignitaries. He also says, "In a democracy, it would be nice that the visiting dignitaries meet everyone... I think this is an important visit, and in our country, without doubt, many important bilateral relations need to be maintained- with Russia, China, and the US. We cannot accept a proposition that one relationship has to be determined by the nature of another relationship. We should have sovereign autonomy, actually, to decide the terms of our own engagement. Its in that spirit I beleive that we have maintained good relations with Russia, US, and China, at different times and a different emphasis. A lot of talks have already taken place at the expert level to work out some possible agreements that might be signed when President Putin is here, and that would be very valuable for us... Defence cooperation has been very important. We already saw the utility of the S-400 air defence system during Operation Sindoor. There are now discussions of more S-400, or maybe even S-500... There is a possibility of a mobility agreement for our workers. We don't want a situation where our people go for one thing and end up being pressured into the Army. There should be some formal agreement about how these things happen. There is no doubt that there is a lot to be discussed, and I am convinced that our Prime Minister and President Putin will have a good conversation... The LoP has made his point, and I think the government should respond..."

ANI

30,908 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Witkoff: “I Was Duped by Hamas” — Blames Terror Group for Collapsed Ceasefire Deal FOX: “I know that you've said Hamas has been unreasonable in trying to respond to another round of the next phase of a ceasefire. Where do we go from here? What are the odds you get them back to the table and get these hostages home?” WITKOFF: “Well, I certainly hope we get everybody back to the table and get the hostages home. I was I was in, Doha. I met with, many of the Arab leaders at the Arab summit. I thought we had a deal, an acceptable deal. I I even I even thought we had an approval from Hamas. Maybe that's just me getting, getting, you know, duped, but, but I thought we were there, and evidently, we weren't. So this is on Hamas. The United States stands with the state of Israel. There's just, that's that's a 100% commitment, and we've expressed that. Hamas had every opportunity to demilitarize, to accept the bridging proposal that would have given us a forty or fifty day cease fire where we could have discussed demilitarization and a final truce. There were all kinds of opportunities to do that, and they elected not to. And this becomes the alternative, and it is unfortunate. Do I think if would we be, amenable to a reach out from Hamas? Of course, we would be. No different than in the Russian conflict. We wanna end the killing. But, we need to be clear who the aggressor is here, and that is Hamas”
1:34

Witkoff: “I Was Duped by Hamas” — Blames Terror Group for Collapsed Ceasefire Deal FOX: “I know that you've said Hamas has been unreasonable in trying to respond to another round of the next phase of a ceasefire. Where do we go from here? What are the odds you get them back to the table and get these hostages home?” WITKOFF: “Well, I certainly hope we get everybody back to the table and get the hostages home. I was I was in, Doha. I met with, many of the Arab leaders at the Arab summit. I thought we had a deal, an acceptable deal. I I even I even thought we had an approval from Hamas. Maybe that's just me getting, getting, you know, duped, but, but I thought we were there, and evidently, we weren't. So this is on Hamas. The United States stands with the state of Israel. There's just, that's that's a 100% commitment, and we've expressed that. Hamas had every opportunity to demilitarize, to accept the bridging proposal that would have given us a forty or fifty day cease fire where we could have discussed demilitarization and a final truce. There were all kinds of opportunities to do that, and they elected not to. And this becomes the alternative, and it is unfortunate. Do I think if would we be, amenable to a reach out from Hamas? Of course, we would be. No different than in the Russian conflict. We wanna end the killing. But, we need to be clear who the aggressor is here, and that is Hamas”

Open Source Intel

172,260 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“You’re talking about hundreds dead over a period of weeks.” Robert Pape believes there is now a 70% chance American troops will be sent into Iran, potentially within the next month. He warns that hundreds of American soldiers could be killed within weeks. Robert has spent more than 30 years studying how wars escalate. He has taught members of the US Air Force and began modelling the consequences of America bombing Iran more than two decades ago. I began this conversation by telling him that I had hoped I wouldn’t need to see him again. I meant that I had hoped time would prove his warnings wrong. Instead, several of the developments he forecast when we first met have now happened. What makes Robert’s work so valuable is that he looks beyond whether a military target is successfully hit. He studies how an attack changes public opinion, strengthens nationalism and leaves leaders caught between withdrawing or going further. We discussed things like: - The risk of a limited operation becoming an open-ended war. - Reopening the Strait of Hormuz and why it may be harder than people realise. - Rising fuel prices and the impact they could have on the global economy. - Iran’s ability to conceal drones and missiles across difficult terrain. - Political pressure from the US midterm elections shaping what happens next. Robert explained that weapons could be hidden across a mountainous area larger than California. Even destroying most of them may leave enough to threaten ships travelling through one of the world’s most important energy routes. His analysis is grounded in decades of research, historical evidence and recurring patterns in conflict, which he uses to explain where the current situation may be heading. For anyone trying to understand how the conflict with Iran could become a much larger war, I strongly recommend watching this conversation.
1:44

“You’re talking about hundreds dead over a period of weeks.” Robert Pape believes there is now a 70% chance American troops will be sent into Iran, potentially within the next month. He warns that hundreds of American soldiers could be killed within weeks. Robert has spent more than 30 years studying how wars escalate. He has taught members of the US Air Force and began modelling the consequences of America bombing Iran more than two decades ago. I began this conversation by telling him that I had hoped I wouldn’t need to see him again. I meant that I had hoped time would prove his warnings wrong. Instead, several of the developments he forecast when we first met have now happened. What makes Robert’s work so valuable is that he looks beyond whether a military target is successfully hit. He studies how an attack changes public opinion, strengthens nationalism and leaves leaders caught between withdrawing or going further. We discussed things like: - The risk of a limited operation becoming an open-ended war. - Reopening the Strait of Hormuz and why it may be harder than people realise. - Rising fuel prices and the impact they could have on the global economy. - Iran’s ability to conceal drones and missiles across difficult terrain. - Political pressure from the US midterm elections shaping what happens next. Robert explained that weapons could be hidden across a mountainous area larger than California. Even destroying most of them may leave enough to threaten ships travelling through one of the world’s most important energy routes. His analysis is grounded in decades of research, historical evidence and recurring patterns in conflict, which he uses to explain where the current situation may be heading. For anyone trying to understand how the conflict with Iran could become a much larger war, I strongly recommend watching this conversation.

Steven Bartlett

24,457 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is a stunning admission from ECB President Christine Lagarde, and a perfect window into the globalist mindset. She laments that "democratic process" is a "drag" and that "speed is of the essence." She is frustrated that her grand vision—a Digital Euro—is being slowed down by the tedious necessity of parliamentary debate and public scrutiny. Let's be clear about what she is saying: ➡️ Democracy is an obstacle. The very systems of checks and balances that protect our sovereignty are seen as inconvenient roadblocks to their centralized control. ➡️ They fear being "left in the dust." This isn't about serving European citizens. It's a technocratic race against other global powers (and their own citizens' awakening) to cement a new financial system before people can resist. ➡️ "We have to accelerate." This is the mantra of the unelected. When you hear this, know that due process, transparency, and individual rights are about to be trampled in the name of "progress." The Digital Euro, the Capital Markets Union, the Banking Union—these are not tools for your freedom. They are the architecture for a system of total financial surveillance and control. They will decide what you can buy, where you can spend, and will have the power to freeze you out with the click of a button. Lagarde is right about one thing: time is running out. But not for their project. It's running out for us to wake up, organize, and defend our national sovereignty and economic liberty from these unaccountable elites. The greatest threat to our freedom is not being "left in the dust," but being locked in a digital cage we never agreed to.
1:19

This is a stunning admission from ECB President Christine Lagarde, and a perfect window into the globalist mindset. She laments that "democratic process" is a "drag" and that "speed is of the essence." She is frustrated that her grand vision—a Digital Euro—is being slowed down by the tedious necessity of parliamentary debate and public scrutiny. Let's be clear about what she is saying: ➡️ Democracy is an obstacle. The very systems of checks and balances that protect our sovereignty are seen as inconvenient roadblocks to their centralized control. ➡️ They fear being "left in the dust." This isn't about serving European citizens. It's a technocratic race against other global powers (and their own citizens' awakening) to cement a new financial system before people can resist. ➡️ "We have to accelerate." This is the mantra of the unelected. When you hear this, know that due process, transparency, and individual rights are about to be trampled in the name of "progress." The Digital Euro, the Capital Markets Union, the Banking Union—these are not tools for your freedom. They are the architecture for a system of total financial surveillance and control. They will decide what you can buy, where you can spend, and will have the power to freeze you out with the click of a button. Lagarde is right about one thing: time is running out. But not for their project. It's running out for us to wake up, organize, and defend our national sovereignty and economic liberty from these unaccountable elites. The greatest threat to our freedom is not being "left in the dust," but being locked in a digital cage we never agreed to.

Camus

386,988 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Andrew Tate - Uncovering the Truth The case against Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate has received significant media attention and has raised important questions about the role of prosecutors and the criminal justice system in cases of this nature. Many people have expressed concern that the case against the brothers is based on weak evidence and may be politically motivated. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that the case is an attempt to silence the brothers. The investigation began 1 year ago, and they have been in preventative detention for 4 months ago. Despite the passage of time, the prosecutor has failed to file charges against them, and the case remains unresolved. The brothers have vehemently denied the allegations against them and have consistently maintained their innocence. Despite the challenges they have faced, the brothers have remained resilient and have continued to fight for their rights and their freedom. Throughout the investigation, the prosecutor has used various underhanded tactics, including leaking snippets of information from the case, private communications with family and attorneys, and other such tactics to build a case against the brothers. However, despite these efforts, the prosecutor has been unable to create a substantial case file. The reason for this is that the allegations made against the brothers are weak, lacking merit and substance. The allegations made by the women contain numerous inconsistencies and lack evidence, and the women themselves are not credible witnesses. CCTV footage and leaked messages have demonstrated that the women had complete freedom of movement, both physically and psychologically, which suggests that no human trafficking occurred. The CCTV footage clearly shows that the women were free to leave and return to the house without any interference from the brothers, indicating physical freedom of movement. Additionally, leaked messages suggest that the women had access to people outside of Romania, they had their passports, and they used Uber regularly, which shows that they had psychological freedom. Regarding the alleged offense of rape, at least three witnesses have categorically stated that it was consensual. There is no other evidence, and the woman who made the claim did so weeks after leaving Romania, which further weakens her case. Several alleged victims have publicly stated that they are not victims, but the prosecutor has ignored their claims and included them as victims. This suggests that the prosecutor is unwilling to accept evidence that contradicts their narrative, which is concerning. The claim made against the brothers was that they brainwashed the women, but the psychiatrist never spoke to the women in question to make such a determination. Instead, the psychiatrist relied on the word of two women from the UK and US to make the determination, which is a biased and flawed process. The prosecutor attempted to bolster the claim despite the lack of evidence, indicating that the case against the brothers is paper-thin. It is unclear when the case against the brothers will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the outcome will have significant implications for the criminal justice system in Romania and beyond. Many are watching this case closely, and the world is waiting to see what will happen next. The brothers continue to maintain their innocence and to fight for their rights. They have vowed to clear their names and to expose the injustices that have been perpetrated against them. Initially, many believed that the brothers were guilty of the allegations against them, but upon closer examination of the evidence, leaks, and reporting, it is clear that the case against them is weak. It is important to ensure that justice is served. This case has highlighted the importance of due process and fair trials, and it has reminded us that everyone, regardless of their status or reputation, is entitled to a fair hearing and a fair trial.
0:36

Andrew Tate - Uncovering the Truth The case against Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate has received significant media attention and has raised important questions about the role of prosecutors and the criminal justice system in cases of this nature. Many people have expressed concern that the case against the brothers is based on weak evidence and may be politically motivated. Some have even gone as far as to suggest that the case is an attempt to silence the brothers. The investigation began 1 year ago, and they have been in preventative detention for 4 months ago. Despite the passage of time, the prosecutor has failed to file charges against them, and the case remains unresolved. The brothers have vehemently denied the allegations against them and have consistently maintained their innocence. Despite the challenges they have faced, the brothers have remained resilient and have continued to fight for their rights and their freedom. Throughout the investigation, the prosecutor has used various underhanded tactics, including leaking snippets of information from the case, private communications with family and attorneys, and other such tactics to build a case against the brothers. However, despite these efforts, the prosecutor has been unable to create a substantial case file. The reason for this is that the allegations made against the brothers are weak, lacking merit and substance. The allegations made by the women contain numerous inconsistencies and lack evidence, and the women themselves are not credible witnesses. CCTV footage and leaked messages have demonstrated that the women had complete freedom of movement, both physically and psychologically, which suggests that no human trafficking occurred. The CCTV footage clearly shows that the women were free to leave and return to the house without any interference from the brothers, indicating physical freedom of movement. Additionally, leaked messages suggest that the women had access to people outside of Romania, they had their passports, and they used Uber regularly, which shows that they had psychological freedom. Regarding the alleged offense of rape, at least three witnesses have categorically stated that it was consensual. There is no other evidence, and the woman who made the claim did so weeks after leaving Romania, which further weakens her case. Several alleged victims have publicly stated that they are not victims, but the prosecutor has ignored their claims and included them as victims. This suggests that the prosecutor is unwilling to accept evidence that contradicts their narrative, which is concerning. The claim made against the brothers was that they brainwashed the women, but the psychiatrist never spoke to the women in question to make such a determination. Instead, the psychiatrist relied on the word of two women from the UK and US to make the determination, which is a biased and flawed process. The prosecutor attempted to bolster the claim despite the lack of evidence, indicating that the case against the brothers is paper-thin. It is unclear when the case against the brothers will be resolved, but one thing is certain: the outcome will have significant implications for the criminal justice system in Romania and beyond. Many are watching this case closely, and the world is waiting to see what will happen next. The brothers continue to maintain their innocence and to fight for their rights. They have vowed to clear their names and to expose the injustices that have been perpetrated against them. Initially, many believed that the brothers were guilty of the allegations against them, but upon closer examination of the evidence, leaks, and reporting, it is clear that the case against them is weak. It is important to ensure that justice is served. This case has highlighted the importance of due process and fair trials, and it has reminded us that everyone, regardless of their status or reputation, is entitled to a fair hearing and a fair trial.

Mario Nawfal

3,646,145 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

I’ve just finished watching this BBC report, and it really broke my heart. I wish our African leaders would sit down and resolve these issues diplomatically. I also wish our leaders would take the time to fully understand what is actually happening on the ground before reacting. I do not think it is fair to suggest that the South African government has remained silent or failed to condemn the actions of the small number of individuals who have harassed or intimidated people. There is often much more happening behind the scenes than what appears in media reports. I therefore appeal to African governments to engage through their embassies, diplomatic channels, and direct communication with Pretoria. We must be careful not to make decisions based purely on emotions or media headlines in ways that could undermine African unity. I live in South Africa, and my experience is that news coverage can sometimes create the impression that a situation is far bigger or more widespread than it actually is. That is why, some months ago, I cautioned the South African media against giving excessive airtime to fringe groups whose actions tarnish the image of South Africa both continentally and internationally. As journalists, we have a responsibility to report the news accurately, but we must also be careful not to amplify individuals who are deliberately performing for the cameras or seeking publicity through inflammatory statements and actions. My plea is simple, let African leaders engage one another calmly, honestly, and diplomatically. Africa’s challenges will not be solved through megaphone diplomacy or emotional reactions. They will be solved through dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to preserving the unity of our continent. There are people who are benefiting from what is going on, and I have no doubt that some of them will sleep very well tonight after watching this report. Let us be honest, South Africa has an immigration crisis, and pretending otherwise helps no one. It is a real issue that cannot simply be swept under the carpet. However, we must also be honest about a second reality, there are elements within South African society that are exploiting this immigration crisis, as well as the country’s economic challenges and unemployment, for political and populist purposes. What should be a serious discussion about immigration policy, border management, economic growth, and job creation is, in some instances, being turned into a vehicle for political mobilisation and the pursuit of narrow agendas. That is why I appeal to African governments to look beyond the headlines and seek to understand what is happening in the background. There are forces taking advantage of a genuine problem and manipulating public frustration for their own ends. As Africans, we have a responsibility to approach these issues with honesty and maturity. The first step is to acknowledge that South Africa has an immigration challenge. The second is to recognise that some political and social actors are exploiting that challenge for reasons that have little to do with finding real solutions. If we fail to understand both realities at the same time, we risk misdiagnosing the problem and deepening divisions at a time when Africa needs unity, dialogue, and practical solutions.
2:14

I’ve just finished watching this BBC report, and it really broke my heart. I wish our African leaders would sit down and resolve these issues diplomatically. I also wish our leaders would take the time to fully understand what is actually happening on the ground before reacting. I do not think it is fair to suggest that the South African government has remained silent or failed to condemn the actions of the small number of individuals who have harassed or intimidated people. There is often much more happening behind the scenes than what appears in media reports. I therefore appeal to African governments to engage through their embassies, diplomatic channels, and direct communication with Pretoria. We must be careful not to make decisions based purely on emotions or media headlines in ways that could undermine African unity. I live in South Africa, and my experience is that news coverage can sometimes create the impression that a situation is far bigger or more widespread than it actually is. That is why, some months ago, I cautioned the South African media against giving excessive airtime to fringe groups whose actions tarnish the image of South Africa both continentally and internationally. As journalists, we have a responsibility to report the news accurately, but we must also be careful not to amplify individuals who are deliberately performing for the cameras or seeking publicity through inflammatory statements and actions. My plea is simple, let African leaders engage one another calmly, honestly, and diplomatically. Africa’s challenges will not be solved through megaphone diplomacy or emotional reactions. They will be solved through dialogue, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to preserving the unity of our continent. There are people who are benefiting from what is going on, and I have no doubt that some of them will sleep very well tonight after watching this report. Let us be honest, South Africa has an immigration crisis, and pretending otherwise helps no one. It is a real issue that cannot simply be swept under the carpet. However, we must also be honest about a second reality, there are elements within South African society that are exploiting this immigration crisis, as well as the country’s economic challenges and unemployment, for political and populist purposes. What should be a serious discussion about immigration policy, border management, economic growth, and job creation is, in some instances, being turned into a vehicle for political mobilisation and the pursuit of narrow agendas. That is why I appeal to African governments to look beyond the headlines and seek to understand what is happening in the background. There are forces taking advantage of a genuine problem and manipulating public frustration for their own ends. As Africans, we have a responsibility to approach these issues with honesty and maturity. The first step is to acknowledge that South Africa has an immigration challenge. The second is to recognise that some political and social actors are exploiting that challenge for reasons that have little to do with finding real solutions. If we fail to understand both realities at the same time, we risk misdiagnosing the problem and deepening divisions at a time when Africa needs unity, dialogue, and practical solutions.

Hopewell Chin’ono

67,587 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

INSANE: Diego (a 19-year-old Physics student at UCL) has received an email from his university saying there have been “allegations of misconduct”, based on comments he made in a private WhatsApp group where he pushed back against abortion, mass migration and woke ideology. This is the state of free speech in universities! FULL EMAIL: 'Dear Diego, I hope you are well. I am one of the Senior Casework Officers in the UCL Casework Team and I am contacting you today to make you aware that allegations of misconduct have been raised against you by a number of students. In particular, the allegations relate to allegedly offensive messages that have been sent by you within a Whatsapp Community named ‘State of the Debate’. We are acutely aware that the Whatsapp Community is designed to be a place where students can share political opinions and therefore, I would like to stress that we are considering the allegations that have been raised along with your freedom of speech rights. We have a duty to investigate matters that are brought to our attention however this is not an investigation into your lawful political beliefs. The purpose is to establish the facts regarding specific reported behaviour and the potential impact of actions or communications where these may relate to UCL policies, the rights of other students and the learning environment. In line with our investigative process, I would like to invite you to a Conduct Interview to address the issues that have been raised and provide you with the opportunity to respond to them. I propose that we hold the interview on Tuesday 2nd June at 14.00hrs. Once you have confirmed this date and time, I will send you across a confirmation letter with all of the details including the specific allegations that are being investigated, and a Teams Meeting calendar link. As per our regulations, you have the right to be accompanied by a Supporter at the interview. A Supporter may act in the capacity as a ‘friend’ or ‘representative’, and will normally be someone who is a UCL student or member of staff of UCL or an advisor from Students’ Union. If you could please let me know if you would like someone to join you in the Conduct Interview in this capacity, please provide me with their details no later than Wednesday 27th May. I understand that this news may be distressing and if you feel as though you could benefit from further support, please do contact our Student Support & Wellbeing Team. The Advisors at the Students’ Union are also experienced in providing support to students who have been subject to investigations, so please do make contact with them too, should you want to. If you have any questions, please just let me know and I look forward to hearing from you.' SHAME ON YOU UCL
1:43

INSANE: Diego (a 19-year-old Physics student at UCL) has received an email from his university saying there have been “allegations of misconduct”, based on comments he made in a private WhatsApp group where he pushed back against abortion, mass migration and woke ideology. This is the state of free speech in universities! FULL EMAIL: 'Dear Diego, I hope you are well. I am one of the Senior Casework Officers in the UCL Casework Team and I am contacting you today to make you aware that allegations of misconduct have been raised against you by a number of students. In particular, the allegations relate to allegedly offensive messages that have been sent by you within a Whatsapp Community named ‘State of the Debate’. We are acutely aware that the Whatsapp Community is designed to be a place where students can share political opinions and therefore, I would like to stress that we are considering the allegations that have been raised along with your freedom of speech rights. We have a duty to investigate matters that are brought to our attention however this is not an investigation into your lawful political beliefs. The purpose is to establish the facts regarding specific reported behaviour and the potential impact of actions or communications where these may relate to UCL policies, the rights of other students and the learning environment. In line with our investigative process, I would like to invite you to a Conduct Interview to address the issues that have been raised and provide you with the opportunity to respond to them. I propose that we hold the interview on Tuesday 2nd June at 14.00hrs. Once you have confirmed this date and time, I will send you across a confirmation letter with all of the details including the specific allegations that are being investigated, and a Teams Meeting calendar link. As per our regulations, you have the right to be accompanied by a Supporter at the interview. A Supporter may act in the capacity as a ‘friend’ or ‘representative’, and will normally be someone who is a UCL student or member of staff of UCL or an advisor from Students’ Union. If you could please let me know if you would like someone to join you in the Conduct Interview in this capacity, please provide me with their details no later than Wednesday 27th May. I understand that this news may be distressing and if you feel as though you could benefit from further support, please do contact our Student Support & Wellbeing Team. The Advisors at the Students’ Union are also experienced in providing support to students who have been subject to investigations, so please do make contact with them too, should you want to. If you have any questions, please just let me know and I look forward to hearing from you.' SHAME ON YOU UCL

Montgomery Toms

57,902 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

For a long time most Jewish organizations and Jewish leaders in the world treated these false claims against Israel and the Jewish people as absurd, and on their face, ridiculous. And so we ignored the claims, and we let them sort of lie and fester for a long time. And one of the big criticisms that I've heard about my book, Israel on Trial, especially from Jewish organizations, is, "Well, we shouldn't give these these allegations the time of day. We should ignore them. We shouldn't put Israel on trial, we should put Hamas on trial." All of that, I think, is fair. Hamas should be on trial. But the opposite is not necessarily true either. And I think the strategy we have taken over the last 20 or 30 years—of ignoring these claims—has proven to be a fatal mistake. And the reason for that is whether in the law or in sports or in politics, when you ignore the other side's argument, you lose. That's just how it is. No matter how flagrantly absurd the argument is. In the law, if the other side files a motion, it's an adversarial system, if you don't respond to it, the judge isn't going to delve deeply into the correctness of the motion. They've got 300 other motions to deal with. If there's an unobjected to motion, that motion is granted by what we call default. The same thing happens in sports. If one football team arrives on the field and the other team doesn't show up, they win by forfeit. And so in either case, not rebutting the arguments that you believe are frivolous has allowed these arguments really to spread like wildfire across our population, both in our young people and even now bleeding into people in their 30s, 40s, and 50s. It's a very dangerous game we've been playing, and we were wrong to play it. The point of my book is to be patient with these arguments, show people that we can engage these arguments, and that on the merits they are totally false and frivolous as a matter of fact and law.
3:48

For a long time most Jewish organizations and Jewish leaders in the world treated these false claims against Israel and the Jewish people as absurd, and on their face, ridiculous. And so we ignored the claims, and we let them sort of lie and fester for a long time. And one of the big criticisms that I've heard about my book, Israel on Trial, especially from Jewish organizations, is, "Well, we shouldn't give these these allegations the time of day. We should ignore them. We shouldn't put Israel on trial, we should put Hamas on trial." All of that, I think, is fair. Hamas should be on trial. But the opposite is not necessarily true either. And I think the strategy we have taken over the last 20 or 30 years—of ignoring these claims—has proven to be a fatal mistake. And the reason for that is whether in the law or in sports or in politics, when you ignore the other side's argument, you lose. That's just how it is. No matter how flagrantly absurd the argument is. In the law, if the other side files a motion, it's an adversarial system, if you don't respond to it, the judge isn't going to delve deeply into the correctness of the motion. They've got 300 other motions to deal with. If there's an unobjected to motion, that motion is granted by what we call default. The same thing happens in sports. If one football team arrives on the field and the other team doesn't show up, they win by forfeit. And so in either case, not rebutting the arguments that you believe are frivolous has allowed these arguments really to spread like wildfire across our population, both in our young people and even now bleeding into people in their 30s, 40s, and 50s. It's a very dangerous game we've been playing, and we were wrong to play it. The point of my book is to be patient with these arguments, show people that we can engage these arguments, and that on the merits they are totally false and frivolous as a matter of fact and law.

Roy K. Altman

14,998 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Are you in favor of public executions? | HBO Overtime. She's correct 💯! As someone whose brother was killed by another person and saw how very sad our justice system can be, I can honestly tell you that I've thought about this question. I do believe that true pedophiles and serial killers and people who deliberately kill another human being deserve the death penalty to be carried out in full. We have made criminals think of our justice system as a means to free housing, free food, free gym, free TV and spending their life sitting in a cell rather than the fear of their life could be over. If they are found guilty. I feel that after someone's trial there should be a year of time that any appeals can be made and approved or any judgments overturned. Once that year is done, if the evidence is there and the death penalty was received then it should be carried out. The taxpayers are paying the burden of 20, 30 and forever. Yours for a lot of these people sitting on death row. Do I believe that there can be innocent people who get convicted. Yes, there can be do I believe there are guilty people who get off from being charged. Yes. However, in a reasonable amount of time, if no new evidence has come to light and no appeals are granted, the person who is guilty of these heinous acts should be finished publicly. How do u feel?
0:57

Are you in favor of public executions? | HBO Overtime. She's correct 💯! As someone whose brother was killed by another person and saw how very sad our justice system can be, I can honestly tell you that I've thought about this question. I do believe that true pedophiles and serial killers and people who deliberately kill another human being deserve the death penalty to be carried out in full. We have made criminals think of our justice system as a means to free housing, free food, free gym, free TV and spending their life sitting in a cell rather than the fear of their life could be over. If they are found guilty. I feel that after someone's trial there should be a year of time that any appeals can be made and approved or any judgments overturned. Once that year is done, if the evidence is there and the death penalty was received then it should be carried out. The taxpayers are paying the burden of 20, 30 and forever. Yours for a lot of these people sitting on death row. Do I believe that there can be innocent people who get convicted. Yes, there can be do I believe there are guilty people who get off from being charged. Yes. However, in a reasonable amount of time, if no new evidence has come to light and no appeals are granted, the person who is guilty of these heinous acts should be finished publicly. How do u feel?

Larry Conger 🇺🇸

31,768 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

#BREAKING: Hayes: These are contested races and the congressional candidates you have endorsed to go up against incumbents may very well lose. It’s a pretty high leveraged bet that you didn’t have to take. Are you worried about losing political capital if they lose? NYC Mayor: “I think there will always be risk when it comes to fighting for working people and I made a promise to New Yorkers that I would use every tool at my disposal to deliver on the agenda to transform the most expensive city in the United States of America into one that is affordable to the people who helped to build it, and these endorsements are part of that because you cannot win that agenda alone, and in Darializa, Claire and Brad, I see partners who would not only be fighting for that same agenda in DC, but also be side by side here as we fight for it in NYC.” 😳
1:13

#BREAKING: Hayes: These are contested races and the congressional candidates you have endorsed to go up against incumbents may very well lose. It’s a pretty high leveraged bet that you didn’t have to take. Are you worried about losing political capital if they lose? NYC Mayor: “I think there will always be risk when it comes to fighting for working people and I made a promise to New Yorkers that I would use every tool at my disposal to deliver on the agenda to transform the most expensive city in the United States of America into one that is affordable to the people who helped to build it, and these endorsements are part of that because you cannot win that agenda alone, and in Darializa, Claire and Brad, I see partners who would not only be fighting for that same agenda in DC, but also be side by side here as we fight for it in NYC.” 😳

Emoluments Clause

35,910 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten