正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

If Memory Safety is The Goal Rust is Not The Solution Every significant Rust program (GNU Coreutils re-write, System76's Cosmic Desktop, etc.) is filled with "unsafe" code.

The Lunduke Journal

34,819 subscribers

59,728 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Memory Corruption Vulnerability in Linux "Memory Safe" Rust Code Rust programmers re-wrote a portion of the Linux kernel in Rust. That Rust code had a crashing vulnerability in an "unsafe" chunk of code... which Linux is littered with.

Memory Corruption Vulnerability in Linux "Memory Safe" Rust Code Rust programmers re-wrote a portion of the Linux kernel in Rust. That Rust code had a crashing vulnerability in an "unsafe" chunk of code... which Linux is littered with.

The Lunduke Journal

70,650 次观看 • 11 个月前

Massive Memory Leaks in System76's Cosmic Desktop (Written in "Memory Safe" Rust) Plus: Hyprland developer weighs in, "No, I don't think it's beta ready :P"

Massive Memory Leaks in System76's Cosmic Desktop (Written in "Memory Safe" Rust) Plus: Hyprland developer weighs in, "No, I don't think it's beta ready :P"

The Lunduke Journal

141,344 次观看 • 1 年前

Ubuntu Hired Security Research Firm After Rust Re-writes Raised "Serious Concerns" With the release of Ubuntu 26.04 (Long Term Support), Ubuntu is revealing massive security and ship-ability issues with the Rust-based, GNU Coreutils replacements.

Ubuntu Hired Security Research Firm After Rust Re-writes Raised "Serious Concerns" With the release of Ubuntu 26.04 (Long Term Support), Ubuntu is revealing massive security and ship-ability issues with the Rust-based, GNU Coreutils replacements.

The Lunduke Journal

26,122 次观看 • 6 个月前

Ubuntu's Rust GNU Utils Replacement 17x Slower & Buggy Canonical plans to replace the battle tested GNU Coreutils with new, untested, Rust-based replacements. It's going as well as you'd expect.

Ubuntu's Rust GNU Utils Replacement 17x Slower & Buggy Canonical plans to replace the battle tested GNU Coreutils with new, untested, Rust-based replacements. It's going as well as you'd expect.

The Lunduke Journal

91,038 次观看 • 1 年前

Flatpak 2: Rust Re-write, Requiring Wayland & Systemd According to The Linux Foundation, the Flatpak packaging system is being re-written in Rust, dropping X11 support, with hard requirements on Systemd and Wayland.

Flatpak 2: Rust Re-write, Requiring Wayland & Systemd According to The Linux Foundation, the Flatpak packaging system is being re-written in Rust, dropping X11 support, with hard requirements on Systemd and Wayland.

The Lunduke Journal

12,167 次观看 • 5 个月前

Is Germany Looking to Put a Backdoor into Arch Linux? The German government paid $500,000+, to Arch Linux, to re-write Arch Package Management in Rust. Is Germany hoping to inject backdoors, or other spyware, into Arch using Rust?

Is Germany Looking to Put a Backdoor into Arch Linux? The German government paid $500,000+, to Arch Linux, to re-write Arch Package Management in Rust. Is Germany hoping to inject backdoors, or other spyware, into Arch using Rust?

The Lunduke Journal

43,404 次观看 • 10 个月前

NeoFetch But in Rust and More Gay HyFetch, a Rust re-write of the discontinued NeoFetch, asks users to choose their flag (Trans, GenderFluid, FemBoy, etc.) at first launch. Becomes defacto on several Linux distros.

NeoFetch But in Rust and More Gay HyFetch, a Rust re-write of the discontinued NeoFetch, asks users to choose their flag (Trans, GenderFluid, FemBoy, etc.) at first launch. Becomes defacto on several Linux distros.

The Lunduke Journal

44,611 次观看 • 10 个月前

Is Rust the least secure programming language? There was yet *another* massive Rust security failure... and nobody seemed surprised. Most Rust activists simply shrugged at the normalcy of it. Considering the frequency and severity of malicious code being added to the Rust Crates ecosystem... is it the least secure programming language toolchain?

Is Rust the least secure programming language? There was yet another massive Rust security failure... and nobody seemed surprised. Most Rust activists simply shrugged at the normalcy of it. Considering the frequency and severity of malicious code being added to the Rust Crates ecosystem... is it the least secure programming language toolchain?

The Lunduke Journal

18,898 次观看 • 2 个月前

fly brain can now write rust code.

fly brain can now write rust code.

tenso

12,708 次观看 • 2 个月前

Facepunch is attempting to reduce Load Times for #Rust, this is a quick test comparing Regular Rust vs current attempts on Staging Branch. The reductions are significant, Huge Work in Progress.

Facepunch is attempting to reduce Load Times for #Rust, this is a quick test comparing Regular Rust vs current attempts on Staging Branch. The reductions are significant, Huge Work in Progress.

Protox

16,792 次观看 • 1 年前

BROOOO THE SPX IS NOT FAIR ON RUST OMG.

BROOOO THE SPX IS NOT FAIR ON RUST OMG.

ghost riley

11,441 次观看 • 3 年前

I tested Rust vs Javascript for games 🎮 I had this question recently and decided to port my Three.js game to Rust Desktop I'm still not able to reproduce the same look on both games but I believe that codewise they are very similar With both games running, the Rust version averages 37FPS while the Three.js version averages around 20FPS If I'm running one game at a time the FPS goes up considerably (60 FPS on both with power on) So the Rust version for Desktop has 85% increase in performance on my Macbook Pro M4 This comparision is basically comparing Browser vs Native, which is not completely fair So that's why I want to port the Rust version to WASM on the browser and benchmark again soon

I tested Rust vs Javascript for games 🎮 I had this question recently and decided to port my Three.js game to Rust Desktop I'm still not able to reproduce the same look on both games but I believe that codewise they are very similar With both games running, the Rust version averages 37FPS while the Three.js version averages around 20FPS If I'm running one game at a time the FPS goes up considerably (60 FPS on both with power on) So the Rust version for Desktop has 85% increase in performance on my Macbook Pro M4 This comparision is basically comparing Browser vs Native, which is not completely fair So that's why I want to port the Rust version to WASM on the browser and benchmark again soon

André → andreelias.dev

93,523 次观看 • 5 个月前

Why is Rust different than many/most programming languages? Alice Ryhl works on Google's Android Rust team, is a Rust language team advisor, and is a core maintainer of Tokio (the most widely-used async runtime in Rust) Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 04:09 Tokio: an overview 05:11 What Alice likes about Rust 12:48 Rust for TypeScript engineers 13:51 Moving from C++ to Rust 14:34 Memory safety 18:12 Garbage collection tradeoffs 21:46 Ownership, references, and borrowing 26:59 Unsafe in Rust 31:21 Crates and Cargo 35:55 Language design and RFCs 43:02 Building new features 46:30 Editions vs. versions 49:47 Getting paid to work on Rust 51:27 Contributing to Rust 53:03 Rust in the Linux kernel 55:45 AI use cases for Rust 1:01:35 Learning Rust 1:03:54 Book recommendation Brought to you by: • Antithesis – verify your system’s correctness without human review or traditional integration tests – and avoid bugs or outages. • Sentry – application monitoring software considered “not bad” by millions of developers Three things worth knowing about Rust: 1. Rust was designed to turn implicit failures into compile errors. Where other languages allow you to forget something, Rust makes an omission into a compilation error for things like null checks, uninitialized variables, or error propagation with the ‘?’ character. If you mess something up, it’s almost certain your program will not compile. If it does, at the very least you should see a lint warning. 2. Refactoring in Rust is safe and easy, thanks to the compiler. Alice: “I change a return type or struct field, then just fix the compiler errors until the compiler stops shouting. And then once I’ve done that, I’ve updated every place I need to update.” Rust’s focus on correctness makes refactoring it more straightforward than dynamically-typed languages and Java-style typed ones are to refactor. 3. “Editions” allow Rust to make breaking changes without ‘breaking’ anyone’s code. Rust editions (2015, 2018, 2021, 2024) can be mixed freely across crates. A library on the 2021 edition works seamlessly with a binary on the 2024 edition. This is how Rust evolves syntax (like adding async/await as keywords) without forcing an ecosystem-wide migration. Thanks a lot, Alice for this great discussion! And for your work on Rust.

Why is Rust different than many/most programming languages? Alice Ryhl works on Google's Android Rust team, is a Rust language team advisor, and is a core maintainer of Tokio (the most widely-used async runtime in Rust) Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 04:09 Tokio: an overview 05:11 What Alice likes about Rust 12:48 Rust for TypeScript engineers 13:51 Moving from C++ to Rust 14:34 Memory safety 18:12 Garbage collection tradeoffs 21:46 Ownership, references, and borrowing 26:59 Unsafe in Rust 31:21 Crates and Cargo 35:55 Language design and RFCs 43:02 Building new features 46:30 Editions vs. versions 49:47 Getting paid to work on Rust 51:27 Contributing to Rust 53:03 Rust in the Linux kernel 55:45 AI use cases for Rust 1:01:35 Learning Rust 1:03:54 Book recommendation Brought to you by: • Antithesis – verify your system’s correctness without human review or traditional integration tests – and avoid bugs or outages. • Sentry – application monitoring software considered “not bad” by millions of developers Three things worth knowing about Rust: 1. Rust was designed to turn implicit failures into compile errors. Where other languages allow you to forget something, Rust makes an omission into a compilation error for things like null checks, uninitialized variables, or error propagation with the ‘?’ character. If you mess something up, it’s almost certain your program will not compile. If it does, at the very least you should see a lint warning. 2. Refactoring in Rust is safe and easy, thanks to the compiler. Alice: “I change a return type or struct field, then just fix the compiler errors until the compiler stops shouting. And then once I’ve done that, I’ve updated every place I need to update.” Rust’s focus on correctness makes refactoring it more straightforward than dynamically-typed languages and Java-style typed ones are to refactor. 3. “Editions” allow Rust to make breaking changes without ‘breaking’ anyone’s code. Rust editions (2015, 2018, 2021, 2024) can be mixed freely across crates. A library on the 2021 edition works seamlessly with a binary on the 2024 edition. This is how Rust evolves syntax (like adding async/await as keywords) without forcing an ecosystem-wide migration. Thanks a lot, Alice for this great discussion! And for your work on Rust.

Gergely Orosz

52,449 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is the best footprint for duo players in Rust. #rust #rustbase

This is the best footprint for duo players in Rust. #rust #rustbase

YouTube: RustLogic

52,400 次观看 • 4 个月前

Rust is COOKING! #rust #rustnews #rusticated

Rust is COOKING! #rust #rustnews #rusticated

Rusticated

16,965 次观看 • 1 年前

Everyone is writing the TypeScript compiler in rust. I wrote the rust compiler in TypeScript. Introducing “cargovroom” a rust compiler built fully in typescript.

Everyone is writing the TypeScript compiler in rust. I wrote the rust compiler in TypeScript. Introducing “cargovroom” a rust compiler built fully in typescript.

Noah

63,708 次观看 • 23 天前

A solution for every problem! Speedy Rust removal.

A solution for every problem! Speedy Rust removal.

HOW THINGS WORK

176,402 次观看 • 7 个月前