Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

I’m now exploring the possibility that even though we may use the same grade of gas we normally do, that different gas stations have better gas than others. I always use 93 and I normally fill at the Marathon, on this tank I filled at the Circle K and...

59,794 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

250715 #ATEEZ #Mingi TOKTOQ pop live (rough translation): 🐥 I’ve never injured my toenail… It was my toe that got hurt. 💬 How’s your toe? 🐥Well, it probably healed on its own. I’ve been treating it while taking care of it. But it seems like it’s getting better. 💬 How do you run like that? (at the concerts) 🐥 Well, you just get through it. There’s something like that, you know. The ticket prices are expensive. The ticket prices are obviously expensive, and my body, just like everyone else’s, is the most important thing, and my body is the most important to me too. But, anyway, even though my toe hurts a bit or something else hurts, I can’t rest. So, I just have to do my best within what I can do. But if I think like, ‘Oh, my toe hurts, so I’ll skip this show, or skip this city,’ it’s not like I’ve never thought like that. But when you’re too realistic, you only focus on the things you want to do, and instead of putting your best into every moment, you think more about having fun and enjoying it. So, for every performance, no matter what, I have to perform with the same energy, with the same intensity, even if it’s not about working hard or doing my best. When I look at the fans, I don’t want to feel embarrassed. That’s what’s important, I think. Yeah, I have to take good care of myself because I can’t afford to get hurt. But this isn’t like using a phone. It’s not like paying 1,000 won or 500 won. That’s still expensive, but it’s not like that. It’s 100,000, 200,000, 300,000, 400,000, 1,000,000 won - big amounts of money. It’s not something I can just do. Of course, there are people who come with a lot of difficulty. Why are you suddenly talking about insurance? (in the comments). Of course, I have health insurance.

Irene | AhgaTiny

18,605 views • 1 year ago

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: “You said that it’s up to Congress if the president’s face is on a $250 bill. But it is actually — The Washington Post that’s reporting two political appointees from the Treasury Department who have asked agencies to be ready to — to do that. Do you think politically, it’s a good idea to put his face on a $250 bill when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Treasury Secretary Bessent: “You know, I don’t really understand this Washington Post article that — who here’s from The Post? Yeah. Terribly written, terribly edited. Because basically what it says is that Treasury is following the law and that we created the bill and that it’s up to Congress, but that — we follow the bill and it’s up to — I didn’t really understand what the story was.” Bessent: “So — anyway —” Collins: “So, these two political appointees aren’t involved in that? Two of your political appointees?” Bessent: “Yeah, of course, but we — we prepare for everything. If it gets passed, just like we — we were ready six months in advance of the one big, beautiful bill for tax guidance that. So, we have to prepare in advance. You can’t draw something up the day before.” Collins: “But, politically, do you think it’s a good idea, though, when people are struggling to afford gas and groceries?” Bessent: “Look, I think it has — I think that it’s bifurcated. That — do you think we should have a 250th anniversary — the celebration?” Collins: “Well, that’s happening anyway, but putting the President’s face on a $250 bill —” Bessent: “No, no, no, no, no, no, no.” Collins: “— is a choice.” Bessent: “But Kaitlin, it’s not happening anyway. It’s happening because it’s being funded by private citizens, by the federal government, by state governments, by municipal governments to celebrate our country, and I don’t think that there’s anything untoward about having the President of the United States — the person who was President of United States on the 250th anniversary bill.”

Curtis Houck

32,387 views • 2 months ago

CHAMATH: STAYING IN CALIFORNIA (DESPITE THE TAXES) “It’s given me everything, so I will not leave and I will keep building companies there and hiring people there. And if there’s taxes that I have to pay, I’ll pay these taxes. But I just think that at some point, we’re better off addressing the core issue of why people believe this form of governance actually makes sense. Is it because they actually think it’s better, or is it that they’re just angry about a bunch of other things? And I think it’s mostly the latter, so we should fix that because there is no sane human being that could look at any of this information and think that we are well run. We are completely, completely out of our mind… You know, there is a period where I definitely thought about [leaving California] and I went around. I looked at different places and I thought: ‘Wait a minute, California is incredible, Palo Alto is incredible, it’s given me everything.’ And I just said: ‘Okay, mentally here’s the number and just allocate it and just let’s move on with our lives and get back to building things that I think are important.’ The reason why people are angry, it’s the same reason they were angry in 1890, it’s the same reason they were angry in Europe in 1930 at the beginning, it’s the same reason after 2008, we’ve had all of this pushback, it’s the same reason. So at some point, we should just fix the core problem that everybody is shouting about, as opposed to allowing these other people to pervert the frustration they have into these dumb ideas and programs that are always about, give me more money and I will solve your problems. It just doesn’t work… The core problem is there is a large number of people that look and believe that the latter has been pulled up above them. Why do they believe that right now? I think very specifically technology has had this profoundly positive impact but very, very few of us participated in it. In the way that we all think that we’ve made it better for everybody, looking at Instagram reels does not make your life better. That’s not true. Being able to have a functional search is useful, but it doesn’t necessarily make your life better. So we have to answer the question, how does this economically benefit more people?” Chamath Palihapitiya via Squawk Box Andrew Ross Sorkin Joe Kernen

Ron Pragides 

44,518 views • 22 days ago