Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Imagine if every single South African decided to manhandle and scream "kwerekwere" at a cop every time they were unhappy with police work. What would be left of this country? Absolute anarchy. We demand protection from criminals, yet we cheer when a lady treats a senior SA Police Service...

74,435 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is mind numbing and very scary when you realize this is a DA office and they are this ignorant on the laws and upholding the rights of the citizens. This is the kind of situation that should keep every citizen up at night. ​We are looking at the District Attorney’s Office in Colusa, California.—the literal epicenter of law enforcement and legal prosecution—and yet, the people working inside seem to have a collective amnesia regarding the U.S. Constitution. ​It is absolutely mind-boggling to watch public servants, including sworn investigators like Ryan Hudson and Chris Liston, stand there and attempt to steamroll a citizen's rights based on "office policy." Let’s be very clear: A policy is not a law. You cannot "policy" away the First Amendment just because a camera makes you feel "uncomfortable" or "negative." ​ It starts with staff members physically trying to block the lens. In a public lobby where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, this isn't just rude—it’s an attempt to suppress a protected activity. ​ They constantly cite "privacy" as a reason to stop the recording. However, when you are a public official conducting public business in a government building, the courts have been extremely clear: the public has a right to document you. ​ Notice the shift in tone when they can’t find a legal reason to stop the film. They pivot to calling the auditor "uncooperative" or "difficult." Since when did exercising a constitutional right become "uncooperative"? ​If the people working for the DA don’t understand the basic legal framework of our country, how can we trust them to prosecute cases fairly? If they are this willing to ignore your rights when a camera is pointed at them, imagine what they’re doing when no one is watching. ​This isn't just about a guy with a camera; it’s about whether our public officials answer to the law or to their own egos.

Giggling Ganon

36,085 views • 2 months ago

Look at this video. More than 15 armed police officers descend on a single defenseless young man in Kiamaiko. He is unarmed. He is overpowered. He poses no visible threat. Yet the blows keep coming. What is even more disturbing is that many of the strikes appear directed at his back and spinal area. Why? What purpose does that serve other than to inflict maximum pain and possibly permanent injury? Who is teaching our brothers and sisters in uniform that force must continue long after a suspect has been subdued? When did arrest become synonymous with punishment? When did law enforcement become an exercise in humiliation, maiming, or killing? A young man surrounded by more than 15 armed officers does not require such violence to be arrested. He requires restraint, professionalism, and respect for the law. I want to ask the Inspector General of the National Police Service, Douglas Kanja, not just as the head of law enforcement, but as a father: When you watch this video, what do you feel? If that young man being beaten was your son, would you be satisfied with this conduct? Would you call it justice? Would you call it policing? Every Kenyan child is someone's son. Every Kenyan child is someone's hope, someone's prayer, someone's future. The uniform should inspire safety, not fear. The badge should symbolize protection, not brutality. A nation cannot claim to uphold the rule of law while turning a blind eye to such scenes. Kenyans are not asking for special treatment. We are asking for humanity. We are asking for accountability. We are asking that those entrusted with power remember that the people they police are human beings whose lives matter. The tears of mothers who watch their children brutalized by those sworn to protect them should trouble the conscience of this nation.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

28,259 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: Fani Willis faces relentless attacks from Trump and Republicans and is now forced to move around with bodyguards. She even had to leave her home while nobody is defending her, MSNBC's Rachel Rachel Maddow claims, urges Americans to save the rule of law from death today and re-elect Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney who is prosecuting Trump in Georgia. WATCH "She travels with bodyguards, she's been forced to leave her home. All this while former President Trump continues to attack her relentlessly to his supporters, and as Republicans at the county, state, and federal level do everything they can to undermine and impugn and stymie her work and smear her personally. This level of sustained public attack is not usually the price of entry for doing your job as a district attorney. Nor should it be in a country where the rule of law is supposedly the rule. The ability of prosecutors and judges to do their jobs without fear is a fundamental test of our democracy. Whether you like the Georgia criminal case against former President Trump or not, Fani Willis is one of the bellwethers for the rule of law in this country. The history of the rule of law in this country tells us that the rule of law does not magically defend itself. And it is mortal. It can be killed when it is attacked. It breaks. The rule of law in this country, in practical terms, is made up of people doing hard jobs who themselves can break when they are attacked. And right now, you and I, all of us, we are making history in this country. And the history that we are making is that there is no one defending Fani Willis but herself. And in the noble alternate version of this history that we'd like to imagine we would be part of, the whole country would be up in arms about Georgia and about New York and about all of these cases, telling these people to back off the judges, back off the witnesses and the jurors, back off the prosecutors, back off Fonny Willis. Protect these cases. Protect the rule of law. We imagine that's who we are as a country, but we are not showing it. We are not standing up to defend these people, at least not yet. Let's start with the federal government and Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan has time after time after time attacked my office with no legitimate purpose. Anyone who knows Jim Jordan's history knows that he only has the purpose of trying to interfere in a criminal investigation. He has now turned his tricks to, he's going to look at grant programs, which I invite him to do, and we have complied with his subpoenas, but yet he continues his attacks to try to interfere in a criminal investigation while all, while his jurisdiction has one of the worst crime rates, has poverty issues, and not one time has he used his position to try to investigate people who are attacking me and attacking others legitimately, doing their jobs, making him illegitimate in his position. And it's disgusting. And so I bring that up at the federal level because now at the state level, they've decided to follow this clown's lead and they want to now try to interfere in an investigation. And it's not legitimate either. And so it shall fail, and it's not going to go anywhere. But they are trying to attack me at every level."

Simon Ateba

714,278 views • 2 years ago

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Hopewell Chin’ono

80,812 views • 3 months ago