正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

"Imagining a Single Trident II Missile Launched Toward Moscow: Devastating Scenario" What would happen if a single Trident II missile was launched toward Moscow? This video explores the devastating potential of this advanced nuclear-capable missile, capable of carrying multiple warheads with precision targeting. We’ll analyze its speed, destructive power,...

295,762 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

8 条评论

Jack Thompson 的头像
Jack Thompson1 年前

Pure insanity at every level

Shockme 的头像
Shockme1 年前

Who cares, we know that we can blow the world up. We need peace and to stop the fighting everywhere.

Alex Chudnovsky 的头像
Alex Chudnovsky1 年前

That’s why it is called mutually assured destruction.

Ade Kind 的头像
Ade Kind1 年前

Most western weapons are inferior to Russian's weapons... The conflict in Ukraine has detailed that

Borko Nikolcic 的头像
Borko Nikolcic1 年前

Trident failed few tests. USA and UK should legitimately test it in non nuclear form and hit target 3k km away.

mahmud isa 的头像
mahmud isa1 年前

Very good wef heard what the Trident could do but have you heard what the samrat could do?

Kev 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 的头像
Kev 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿1 年前

Trident has failed on its 2 last test launches. It don’t work.

Geoff1467 的头像
Geoff14671 年前

We send some they send some and it's game over

相关视频

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,702 次观看 • 10 个月前