Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

IMEE MARCOS LOSES IT WHEN THE FACTS DON’T MATCH HER NARRATIVE #ImpeachmentTrial Imee Marcos tried to lecture a COA auditor… then got mad when he didn’t fold. “Kanina mo pa ko inaaway” ,sabi niya kay Atty. Wamil, as if asking clarifying questions is a personal attack. She kept pushing... that Sara is not the accountable officer, even as the auditor calmly explained that the head of agency still has clear responsibility under the same rules she was quoting. When the facts didn’t match her narrative, she interrupted, demanded yes-or-no answers, and had staff whispering about contempt. This isn’t neutral questioning. This is lawyering from the bench. Imee R. Marcos Senate of the Philippines #SaraDuterteImpeachment #AccountableOfficershow more

J. 🇵🇭

1,425 subscribers

27,311 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

#ImpeachmentTrial

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Bongbong Marcos and Martin Romualdez versus Imee Marcos Re: San Juanico Bridge Rehabilitation Imee Romualdez Marcos is just a Waray when it benefits her, huh? Despite that, Tacloban City supported her, enough to end up second in the polls. But for the love of the Dutertes, she’s not just willing to abandon her family —- she also abandoned her common sense and reason. In her desperate attempt to paint Martin Romualdez in a bad light to please Sara Duterte, Imee Marcos made a fool out of herself. House Spokesperson, Atty. Princess Abante, argued that if she wanted to… as Senator, she has every power/ mandate to propose a higher budget for the San Juanico bridge. Atty. Abante in several media interviews that Martin Romualdez made sure that there are funds allocated for San Juanico bridge, she cited actual amounts: “P27M noong 2018, P22M noong 2019, P105M noong 2021, P90M noong 2022, P150M noong 2023, at may proposal na P400M para sa 2026.” But as Atty. Clarie Castro mentioned in the video attached below, it was only during the time of President Bongbong Marcos Jr., that the bridge was inspected. When the President went to Tacloban with the House Speaker Romualdez and Senior Deputy Majority Leader Sandro Marcos… he hinted that the previous administration neglected the maintenance of the bridge. Well, Imee Marcos sure knows how to point fingers but not willing to do the work. Both President Bongbong Marcos Jr and House Speaker Martin Romualdez are already working to address the problem, as both recognize the vital role of the bridge for the economy of Samar and Leyte. Romauldez and Acidre coordinated with public and private sectors to come up with alternative routes by sea while the repair is on-going. The President also set an ultimatum, he wants the San Juanico bridge rehab done by December. And no, we don’t want Imee Marcos as the next President. She’s just another Sara Duterte lapdog for reasons I really don’t know. Lols

Bongbong Marcos and Martin Romualdez versus Imee Marcos Re: San Juanico Bridge Rehabilitation Imee Romualdez Marcos is just a Waray when it benefits her, huh? Despite that, Tacloban City supported her, enough to end up second in the polls. But for the love of the Dutertes, she’s not just willing to abandon her family —- she also abandoned her common sense and reason. In her desperate attempt to paint Martin Romualdez in a bad light to please Sara Duterte, Imee Marcos made a fool out of herself. House Spokesperson, Atty. Princess Abante, argued that if she wanted to… as Senator, she has every power/ mandate to propose a higher budget for the San Juanico bridge. Atty. Abante in several media interviews that Martin Romualdez made sure that there are funds allocated for San Juanico bridge, she cited actual amounts: “P27M noong 2018, P22M noong 2019, P105M noong 2021, P90M noong 2022, P150M noong 2023, at may proposal na P400M para sa 2026.” But as Atty. Clarie Castro mentioned in the video attached below, it was only during the time of President Bongbong Marcos Jr., that the bridge was inspected. When the President went to Tacloban with the House Speaker Romualdez and Senior Deputy Majority Leader Sandro Marcos… he hinted that the previous administration neglected the maintenance of the bridge. Well, Imee Marcos sure knows how to point fingers but not willing to do the work. Both President Bongbong Marcos Jr and House Speaker Martin Romualdez are already working to address the problem, as both recognize the vital role of the bridge for the economy of Samar and Leyte. Romauldez and Acidre coordinated with public and private sectors to come up with alternative routes by sea while the repair is on-going. The President also set an ultimatum, he wants the San Juanico bridge rehab done by December. And no, we don’t want Imee Marcos as the next President. She’s just another Sara Duterte lapdog for reasons I really don’t know. Lols

Just

42,457 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

ROBIN PADILLA IS NOT JUDGING. HE’S DERAILING. 🤡 As senator-judge, his role is simple: test the evidence. Instead, he asked a COA auditor about terrorism, BARMM, and CPP-NPA anniversary. Atty. Wamil is an auditor, not an intelligence officer. His testimony was about receipts, rules, and misuse of confidential funds. Padilla’s questions had nothing to do with that. That’s not cross-examination. That’s distraction. When a judge like Robin prioritizes noise over the record, he doesn’t protect the process, he damages it. #RobinPadilla #Disconnected #Impeachment #COA #Accountability Senate of the Philippines

ROBIN PADILLA IS NOT JUDGING. HE’S DERAILING. 🤡 As senator-judge, his role is simple: test the evidence. Instead, he asked a COA auditor about terrorism, BARMM, and CPP-NPA anniversary. Atty. Wamil is an auditor, not an intelligence officer. His testimony was about receipts, rules, and misuse of confidential funds. Padilla’s questions had nothing to do with that. That’s not cross-examination. That’s distraction. When a judge like Robin prioritizes noise over the record, he doesn’t protect the process, he damages it. #RobinPadilla #Disconnected #Impeachment #COA #Accountability Senate of the Philippines

J. 🇵🇭

11,604 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

IMEE APOLOGIZES TO THE DUTERTES WATCH: After apologizing to her late father, Ferdinand Marcos Sr., for what she described as failing to guide her brother, President Bongbong Marcos, Senator Imee Marcos has expressed remorse toward the Duterte family, saying she feels responsible for putting them in danger. “Higit sa lahat sa VP natin, kay Inday Sara. PInahamak ko siya e. Talagang naiisip ko na guilty na guilty ako,” Marcos said in a Holy Week video message. “Sana nananahimik sa Davao ‘yun, mayor siya, walang kalaban-laban, walang hassle, walang gulo. Si presidente, si Tatay Digong nandito sana sa piling natin. Ang dami kong pagsisisi,” she added. Vice President Sara Duterte is facing a possible impeachment in the House of Representatives, while former President Rodrigo Duterte is now detained at the International Criminal Court. President Marcos and VP Duterte were once part of the “UniTeam alliance” that won the 2022 national elections. | Eimor Santos 📹 Sen. Imee Marcos/Facebook

IMEE APOLOGIZES TO THE DUTERTES WATCH: After apologizing to her late father, Ferdinand Marcos Sr., for what she described as failing to guide her brother, President Bongbong Marcos, Senator Imee Marcos has expressed remorse toward the Duterte family, saying she feels responsible for putting them in danger. “Higit sa lahat sa VP natin, kay Inday Sara. PInahamak ko siya e. Talagang naiisip ko na guilty na guilty ako,” Marcos said in a Holy Week video message. “Sana nananahimik sa Davao ‘yun, mayor siya, walang kalaban-laban, walang hassle, walang gulo. Si presidente, si Tatay Digong nandito sana sa piling natin. Ang dami kong pagsisisi,” she added. Vice President Sara Duterte is facing a possible impeachment in the House of Representatives, while former President Rodrigo Duterte is now detained at the International Criminal Court. President Marcos and VP Duterte were once part of the “UniTeam alliance” that won the 2022 national elections. | Eimor Santos 📹 Sen. Imee Marcos/Facebook

NewsWatch Plus PH

242,575 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Protect one, forget the thousands If Senator Imee Marcos loses her senate seat — at least she can live in Davao City sipping coke zero and munching on lechon with the Dutertes and allies until 2028! Lols. (That is if Sara Duterte will not cut her off after benefiting from her, just like what she did to most of her allies in the past). The audacity of Imee Marcos to even utter the words “pamumulitika”, when she used the hearing to be friends again with the Impeached Vice President. Now, she’s with Sara Duterte everywhere she goes but is that enough for her to win the elections? I sincerely do not think so. I agree with the SILG Remulla, it is indeed important that Imee Marcos values due process unlike the people she is following. I just want to remind the Senator… thousands died because the Dutertes do not believe in due process. Thousands died without a day in court, without an opportunity to prove their innocence. Something Rodrigo Roa Duterte enjoys now in the Netherlands, an opportunity to defend himself with his prominent ICC lawyers. Thousands died, Senator Marcos. In your pursuit to protect one family, you are forgetting the thousands who now long for their deceased loved one. Just to end… I agree with VP Sara Duterte, I think it is time you change your last name. No joke, no joke.

Protect one, forget the thousands If Senator Imee Marcos loses her senate seat — at least she can live in Davao City sipping coke zero and munching on lechon with the Dutertes and allies until 2028! Lols. (That is if Sara Duterte will not cut her off after benefiting from her, just like what she did to most of her allies in the past). The audacity of Imee Marcos to even utter the words “pamumulitika”, when she used the hearing to be friends again with the Impeached Vice President. Now, she’s with Sara Duterte everywhere she goes but is that enough for her to win the elections? I sincerely do not think so. I agree with the SILG Remulla, it is indeed important that Imee Marcos values due process unlike the people she is following. I just want to remind the Senator… thousands died because the Dutertes do not believe in due process. Thousands died without a day in court, without an opportunity to prove their innocence. Something Rodrigo Roa Duterte enjoys now in the Netherlands, an opportunity to defend himself with his prominent ICC lawyers. Thousands died, Senator Marcos. In your pursuit to protect one family, you are forgetting the thousands who now long for their deceased loved one. Just to end… I agree with VP Sara Duterte, I think it is time you change your last name. No joke, no joke.

Just

92,662 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

'GIRL POWER' WATCH: A potential 2028 tandem between Sara Duterte and Imee Marcos is being floated ahead of the next national elections. On Wednesday, Sen. Robin Padilla said he is working to gather support for the possible pairing, with Duterte running for president and Marcos for vice president. “Panahon na para maramdaman ng pinoy ang girl power,” said Padilla. “Kapag umiikot ako sa ibang bansa, yun ang laging sinasabi ko. Gusto ko talaga, Sara-Imee. Reconciliation ako,” he added later on. But Marcos denied having such a plan when she was pressed to comment whether or not she’s considering running as vice president for Duterte in 2028. | Charie Abarca

'GIRL POWER' WATCH: A potential 2028 tandem between Sara Duterte and Imee Marcos is being floated ahead of the next national elections. On Wednesday, Sen. Robin Padilla said he is working to gather support for the possible pairing, with Duterte running for president and Marcos for vice president. “Panahon na para maramdaman ng pinoy ang girl power,” said Padilla. “Kapag umiikot ako sa ibang bansa, yun ang laging sinasabi ko. Gusto ko talaga, Sara-Imee. Reconciliation ako,” he added later on. But Marcos denied having such a plan when she was pressed to comment whether or not she’s considering running as vice president for Duterte in 2028. | Charie Abarca

Inquirer

332,143 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

IMEE ON DUTERTE IMPEACHMENT: ‘INE-EXPECT NA NAMIN’ WATCH: Senator Imee Marcos, an ally of Vice President Sara Duterte, says the minority bloc is already expecting the House to impeach Duterte. “Inaabangan na namin at palagay ko 106 votes madaling madaling makuha,” she says. Marcos says the minority has not discussed plans to oppose the convening of the impeachment court, but notes that Senator Robin Padilla has been “very vocal” about it. She adds that the minority bloc was supposed to meet today to discuss strategies and possible actions, stressing the need to prepare for a potential full-blown trial, but some members were not present. | Eimor Santos

IMEE ON DUTERTE IMPEACHMENT: ‘INE-EXPECT NA NAMIN’ WATCH: Senator Imee Marcos, an ally of Vice President Sara Duterte, says the minority bloc is already expecting the House to impeach Duterte. “Inaabangan na namin at palagay ko 106 votes madaling madaling makuha,” she says. Marcos says the minority has not discussed plans to oppose the convening of the impeachment court, but notes that Senator Robin Padilla has been “very vocal” about it. She adds that the minority bloc was supposed to meet today to discuss strategies and possible actions, stressing the need to prepare for a potential full-blown trial, but some members were not present. | Eimor Santos

NewsWatch Plus PH

34,498 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

This creator said it best “ Manon had it easy because she had the sauce” that’s why most of y’all are mad at her, because the girl is polarising. And even when she was in the group the girls always spoke about wanting her AURA. Her magnetism is what got her into DA, what got people rooting for her then/now and one of the many things we love about her. So this lazy narrative will never stick especially when you use PSA as evidence to prove that, when there’s plenty of videos of her and the girls speaking about how much she pushes everyone to practice more. #FreeManon #WeLoveYouManon

This creator said it best “ Manon had it easy because she had the sauce” that’s why most of y’all are mad at her, because the girl is polarising. And even when she was in the group the girls always spoke about wanting her AURA. Her magnetism is what got her into DA, what got people rooting for her then/now and one of the many things we love about her. So this lazy narrative will never stick especially when you use PSA as evidence to prove that, when there’s plenty of videos of her and the girls speaking about how much she pushes everyone to practice more. #FreeManon #WeLoveYouManon

M 🧚🏽

66,882 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

She is performing for the jury. It’s not the first time she is hearing all of this btw!!!! She heard all of this before the trial from the prosecution!!!! She didn’t shed one tear when it was just her and the legal team in the room! This is as manipulative as it gets! Trying to get juries sympathy!!!! She is a sociopath!!

She is performing for the jury. It’s not the first time she is hearing all of this btw!!!! She heard all of this before the trial from the prosecution!!!! She didn’t shed one tear when it was just her and the legal team in the room! This is as manipulative as it gets! Trying to get juries sympathy!!!! She is a sociopath!!

mandala

40,064 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Senator Imee Marcos and her gang’s contradictions: Twisting the law to protect Duterte Senator Imee Marcos and her gang’s attempt to frame Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest as unlawful is riddled with contradictions and blatant bias. They claims Duterte’s rights were “glaringly violated,” yet conveniently ignores the thousands of Filipinos who were deprived of their right to life under his brutal drug war. Now, when the justice system finally moves against Duterte, Manang Imee suddenly discovers a passion for due process. Let look into their assertions: 1. No Obligation to Arrest Duterte? Wrong. Senator Imee and her pro-Duterte gang asserts that the Philippines had no legal obligation to arrest Duterte because the ICC’s diffusion notice wasn’t a “Red Notice.” Yet, their own investigation confirmed that the Interpol’s “Wanted Persons Red Diffusion” serves the same purpose as a Red Notice, authorising the arrest of fugitives. If this mechanism was valid for other cases, why should Rodrigo Duterte be exempt? Manang Imee and her gang’s argument isn’t based on law—it’s based on political favoritism. 2. “No Due Process” for Duterte? A False Narrative. Senator Imee and her gang criticises the government for allegedly not obtaining a warrant from a Philippine court, but this completely ignores the reality of international legal cooperation. Duterte is wanted for crimes against humanity—an international crime that supersedes national legal barriers when local justice systems fail to act. Manang Imee and her gang’s argument would hold water if the Philippines had genuinely investigated and prosecuted Duterte’s crimes, but the government has done the opposite—shielding him from accountability. The ICC stepped in because Philippine institutions refused or failed to act. 3. The Family Visitation Argument is Pure Hypocrisy. Senator Imee and her gang bemoans that Duterte’s daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte, was temporarily prevented from seeing him after his arrest. They cite Republic Act 7438, which ensures visitation rights for detained individuals. However, this law does not require immediate access during an ongoing law enforcement operation—especially one involving a high-risk individual like Duterte, whose arrest could trigger security threats. If ordinary detainees can have temporary restrictions for operational security, why should Duterte receive special treatment? More importantly, Manang Imee and her gang never once raised concerns about the thousands of drug war victims who never got the chance to say goodbye to their families before being executed without trial. If they truly cared about visitation rights, where was their outrage when Duterte’s police forces killed, dumped, and buried Filipinos without a second thought? Their selective outrage exposes the glaring bias. Conclusion: Senator Imee’s defense of Duterte is not about justice—it’s about power Senator Imee and her gang’s statements are not rooted in legal principle, but in a desperate attempt to shield Duterte from facing the very justice he denied to thousands of Filipinos. The Philippine authorities did not violate due process—they upheld it by cooperating with the ICC to ensure that no one, not even a former president, is above the law. Manang Imee and her gang’s blatant bias in favor of Duterte proves one thing: they are not defending justice—they are defending impunity.

Senator Imee Marcos and her gang’s contradictions: Twisting the law to protect Duterte Senator Imee Marcos and her gang’s attempt to frame Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest as unlawful is riddled with contradictions and blatant bias. They claims Duterte’s rights were “glaringly violated,” yet conveniently ignores the thousands of Filipinos who were deprived of their right to life under his brutal drug war. Now, when the justice system finally moves against Duterte, Manang Imee suddenly discovers a passion for due process. Let look into their assertions: 1. No Obligation to Arrest Duterte? Wrong. Senator Imee and her pro-Duterte gang asserts that the Philippines had no legal obligation to arrest Duterte because the ICC’s diffusion notice wasn’t a “Red Notice.” Yet, their own investigation confirmed that the Interpol’s “Wanted Persons Red Diffusion” serves the same purpose as a Red Notice, authorising the arrest of fugitives. If this mechanism was valid for other cases, why should Rodrigo Duterte be exempt? Manang Imee and her gang’s argument isn’t based on law—it’s based on political favoritism. 2. “No Due Process” for Duterte? A False Narrative. Senator Imee and her gang criticises the government for allegedly not obtaining a warrant from a Philippine court, but this completely ignores the reality of international legal cooperation. Duterte is wanted for crimes against humanity—an international crime that supersedes national legal barriers when local justice systems fail to act. Manang Imee and her gang’s argument would hold water if the Philippines had genuinely investigated and prosecuted Duterte’s crimes, but the government has done the opposite—shielding him from accountability. The ICC stepped in because Philippine institutions refused or failed to act. 3. The Family Visitation Argument is Pure Hypocrisy. Senator Imee and her gang bemoans that Duterte’s daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte, was temporarily prevented from seeing him after his arrest. They cite Republic Act 7438, which ensures visitation rights for detained individuals. However, this law does not require immediate access during an ongoing law enforcement operation—especially one involving a high-risk individual like Duterte, whose arrest could trigger security threats. If ordinary detainees can have temporary restrictions for operational security, why should Duterte receive special treatment? More importantly, Manang Imee and her gang never once raised concerns about the thousands of drug war victims who never got the chance to say goodbye to their families before being executed without trial. If they truly cared about visitation rights, where was their outrage when Duterte’s police forces killed, dumped, and buried Filipinos without a second thought? Their selective outrage exposes the glaring bias. Conclusion: Senator Imee’s defense of Duterte is not about justice—it’s about power Senator Imee and her gang’s statements are not rooted in legal principle, but in a desperate attempt to shield Duterte from facing the very justice he denied to thousands of Filipinos. The Philippine authorities did not violate due process—they upheld it by cooperating with the ICC to ensure that no one, not even a former president, is above the law. Manang Imee and her gang’s blatant bias in favor of Duterte proves one thing: they are not defending justice—they are defending impunity.

The King

41,751 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

THE SENATE HAS BECOME THIS. TAPOS FAKE PALA ‘YUNG PUTUKAN - PBBM WATCH: President Bongbong Marcos breaks his silence on the developments in the Senate. HIGHLIGHTS: No to online voting. Only Sen. Bato will benefit from it and if he wants to vote, he should show up. 2. PBBM: Senate shootout turned out to be fake. “I watched with horror. The Senate has become this.” “Walang nangyaring ganyan nung panahon ko and I never imagined the Senate will descend into this.” 3. Called sister and Sen. Imee Marcos an example of fake news. “She should fire her staff who gave that information,” Marcos said on Sen. Imee’s “no election” plot allegation. 4. Belied Sen. Marcoleta’s statement that SP Alan Cayetano’s presidency is the only one without Malacañang’s blessing. “Out of this world ‘yang mga usapang ‘yan. Malacañang doesn’t give a rubberstamp to the Senate president.” 5. Constitutional amendments—never a topic of discussion: PBBM More on Sen. Imee: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. 6. Cases against majority senators have nothing to do with political alignment. “‘Di ko alam pa’no napunta na ang majority ngayon ang tinatarget e hindi naman sila majority noon [when investigations started].” | via Ivy Reyes,

THE SENATE HAS BECOME THIS. TAPOS FAKE PALA ‘YUNG PUTUKAN - PBBM WATCH: President Bongbong Marcos breaks his silence on the developments in the Senate. HIGHLIGHTS: No to online voting. Only Sen. Bato will benefit from it and if he wants to vote, he should show up. 2. PBBM: Senate shootout turned out to be fake. “I watched with horror. The Senate has become this.” “Walang nangyaring ganyan nung panahon ko and I never imagined the Senate will descend into this.” 3. Called sister and Sen. Imee Marcos an example of fake news. “She should fire her staff who gave that information,” Marcos said on Sen. Imee’s “no election” plot allegation. 4. Belied Sen. Marcoleta’s statement that SP Alan Cayetano’s presidency is the only one without Malacañang’s blessing. “Out of this world ‘yang mga usapang ‘yan. Malacañang doesn’t give a rubberstamp to the Senate president.” 5. Constitutional amendments—never a topic of discussion: PBBM More on Sen. Imee: If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem. 6. Cases against majority senators have nothing to do with political alignment. “‘Di ko alam pa’no napunta na ang majority ngayon ang tinatarget e hindi naman sila majority noon [when investigations started].” | via Ivy Reyes,

Bilyonaryo News Channel

1,386,668 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Manon said that she is HEALTHY and that company keeps pushing this narrative that she chose to be on this hiatus when it's clear that she didn't. Manon has insinuated racial mistreatment from her company is going on and instead of just ripping the band-aid off they continue to egg on fans about her status in the group. Manon was on another artist stage at coachella instead of being with the group. Stop the "well-being" nonsense.

Manon said that she is HEALTHY and that company keeps pushing this narrative that she chose to be on this hiatus when it's clear that she didn't. Manon has insinuated racial mistreatment from her company is going on and instead of just ripping the band-aid off they continue to egg on fans about her status in the group. Manon was on another artist stage at coachella instead of being with the group. Stop the "well-being" nonsense.

M 🧚🏽

374,317 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

“But Serhat doesn’t deserve her.” Meanwhile, Serhat literally shifted the course of his entire life as a teenager, leaving behind everything he loved just so she could have what she wanted, even if that future didn’t include him. When he came back, he fought for her to stay in the mansion because he wanted her safe. He treated her better than anyone ever had. You might think it wasn’t enough, but he did the best he could, and Yıldız herself saw that! He stood against the clan. Against the norms. Against the culture. Against traditions. Against his mother. Against his brother. Against her own brother. Against the man she thought was her father. When he found out her family was fake, he brought her mother to her. And when he realized that woman was not the mother Yıldız deserved, he kicked her out. He saved her life multiple times. And no, before anyone says it, he was not the one putting her life in danger. Yıldız was constantly sacrificing herself out of love, and every single time he tried to stop her from doing that. People tried to take her away from him, and he never let that happen! Even when he divorced her and let her go, he couldn’t completely give up on her. You may call that selfish, but the man was terrified of losing her and believed he had no other choice. He gave up everything. Everything. And he is still ready to give up more if it meant she would be okay and with him. He didn’t care that people talked when she ran away with another man. He didn’t care when she got engaged to someone else. He didn’t care when she told him she didn’t love him and loved somebody else. Because he knew why she was doing those things. He knew she was sacrificing herself for him, just like he had sacrificed himself for her before. This is the same Serhat who learned that the blood feud was fake and immediately continued treating her like she was still his wife, because he never married her only because of that feud in the first place 🤷🏻‍♀️ He married her because, since childhood, he had been convinced she was his destiny! And the only reason he kept running away from her was to save her, not because he wanted to get rid of her. The same man who didn’t care whether she could give him children or not. The same man who said he wanted to build a life with HER, not a family. Meaning he didn’t want children. He wanted Yıldız. I genuinely don’t know what some people are watching. And if you don’t see what I see, that’s okay. We can have different povs but it is so obvious to me that there is something in this story that some people are completely missing🤷🏻‍♀️ Guess after all he doesn’t deserve her …

“But Serhat doesn’t deserve her.” Meanwhile, Serhat literally shifted the course of his entire life as a teenager, leaving behind everything he loved just so she could have what she wanted, even if that future didn’t include him. When he came back, he fought for her to stay in the mansion because he wanted her safe. He treated her better than anyone ever had. You might think it wasn’t enough, but he did the best he could, and Yıldız herself saw that! He stood against the clan. Against the norms. Against the culture. Against traditions. Against his mother. Against his brother. Against her own brother. Against the man she thought was her father. When he found out her family was fake, he brought her mother to her. And when he realized that woman was not the mother Yıldız deserved, he kicked her out. He saved her life multiple times. And no, before anyone says it, he was not the one putting her life in danger. Yıldız was constantly sacrificing herself out of love, and every single time he tried to stop her from doing that. People tried to take her away from him, and he never let that happen! Even when he divorced her and let her go, he couldn’t completely give up on her. You may call that selfish, but the man was terrified of losing her and believed he had no other choice. He gave up everything. Everything. And he is still ready to give up more if it meant she would be okay and with him. He didn’t care that people talked when she ran away with another man. He didn’t care when she got engaged to someone else. He didn’t care when she told him she didn’t love him and loved somebody else. Because he knew why she was doing those things. He knew she was sacrificing herself for him, just like he had sacrificed himself for her before. This is the same Serhat who learned that the blood feud was fake and immediately continued treating her like she was still his wife, because he never married her only because of that feud in the first place 🤷🏻‍♀️ He married her because, since childhood, he had been convinced she was his destiny! And the only reason he kept running away from her was to save her, not because he wanted to get rid of her. The same man who didn’t care whether she could give him children or not. The same man who said he wanted to build a life with HER, not a family. Meaning he didn’t want children. He wanted Yıldız. I genuinely don’t know what some people are watching. And if you don’t see what I see, that’s okay. We can have different povs but it is so obvious to me that there is something in this story that some people are completely missing🤷🏻‍♀️ Guess after all he doesn’t deserve her …

Maurora🫦

25,710 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

The Leverage: US Kept the Wealth as a Collar This is the ugly truth that the video reveals when you watch it with clear eyes: The United States deliberately maintained control over Marcos ill-gotten wealth as a tool of political influence. Think about it. Why has the US not simply returned every stolen cent to the Filipino people? Why have the asset recovery cases dragged on for four decades? Because a Marcos who is desperate to reclaim his family's fortune is a Marcos who will do whatever Washington asks. In the 1989 interview, Marcos Jr. talks about wanting to return to the Philippines and clear his family's name. But he does not talk about the elephant in the room: the billions sitting in US-controlled accounts that he cannot touch unless he plays ball. And play ball he has. From Hostage to Vassal: The Complete Surrender Fast-forward from that 1989 video to the Marcos Jr. presidency today. The same man who admitted American control in the interview has now completed the transformation of the Philippines into a US vassal state. •Nine EDCA bases — up from five under previous administrations. US troops now operate from Philippine soil with what amounts to extraterritoriality. •US missiles on Philippine territory — including the Typhon system capable of striking Chinese targets. The Philippines is now a launchpad for US war plans. •Pax Silica — a reported 99-year, 2,000-hectare US-controlled zone in Tarlac that critics have called a treasonous surrender of Philippine sovereignty. •The Negros 19 massacre — the April 2026 killing of 19 Filipinos, which progressives have tied directly to Marcos Jr.'s fascist policies and his subservience to the US. The pattern is unmistakable. Every time Washington asks for more, Marcos Jr. says yes. More bases. More missiles. More surrender of sovereignty. And the US, in return, continues to dangle the possibility of releasing the frozen billions. The Unbreakable Chain: Money, Blackmail, and Surrender This is the full picture that the 1989 video reveals—if you are willing to see it. The Marcos family stole billions from the Filipino people. The United States helped them hide it, then froze it, then used it as leverage. Bongbong Marcos Jr. spent his entire adult life knowing that his family's fortune was in American hands. And when he became president, he repaid the US by turning the Philippines into a military colony. Every US base on Philippine soil is built on Marcos stolen wealth. Every US missile pointed at China from Philippine territory is financed by Marcos loot. Every surrender of sovereignty to Washington is a payment on a debt that Marcos Jr. believes he owes. The 1989 interview is not ancient history. It is the confession of a man who has always known who owns him. And now, as president, he has sold out the entire nation to the same power that held his family hostage. You must watch this interview. Find the original 1989 video. Watch the young Bongbong Marcos Jr. with your own eyes. Listen to him say that America determines everything. Then ask yourself: why, after nearly 40 years, has the US not returned every stolen cent to the Filipino people? Because the US does not want to. Because keeping that money frozen gives Washington leverage over a compliant puppet president. Because the billions in Marcos loot are not just stolen wealth—they are a bribe to keep the Philippines subservient. The Philippine government should demand the immediate return of all frozen Marcos assets. Every dollar. That money belongs to the Filipino people, not to a criminal family, and not to the United States as a tool of blackmail. But Marcos Jr. will never make that demand. Because asking the US to return the stolen wealth would mean admitting that the US has been using it as leverage, it would mean admitting that he is not a president—he is a hostage. Share this article. Find the video. Watch it. Then demand justice. Wake up, Filipinos. The puppet master is still pulling the strings.

The Leverage: US Kept the Wealth as a Collar This is the ugly truth that the video reveals when you watch it with clear eyes: The United States deliberately maintained control over Marcos ill-gotten wealth as a tool of political influence. Think about it. Why has the US not simply returned every stolen cent to the Filipino people? Why have the asset recovery cases dragged on for four decades? Because a Marcos who is desperate to reclaim his family's fortune is a Marcos who will do whatever Washington asks. In the 1989 interview, Marcos Jr. talks about wanting to return to the Philippines and clear his family's name. But he does not talk about the elephant in the room: the billions sitting in US-controlled accounts that he cannot touch unless he plays ball. And play ball he has. From Hostage to Vassal: The Complete Surrender Fast-forward from that 1989 video to the Marcos Jr. presidency today. The same man who admitted American control in the interview has now completed the transformation of the Philippines into a US vassal state. •Nine EDCA bases — up from five under previous administrations. US troops now operate from Philippine soil with what amounts to extraterritoriality. •US missiles on Philippine territory — including the Typhon system capable of striking Chinese targets. The Philippines is now a launchpad for US war plans. •Pax Silica — a reported 99-year, 2,000-hectare US-controlled zone in Tarlac that critics have called a treasonous surrender of Philippine sovereignty. •The Negros 19 massacre — the April 2026 killing of 19 Filipinos, which progressives have tied directly to Marcos Jr.'s fascist policies and his subservience to the US. The pattern is unmistakable. Every time Washington asks for more, Marcos Jr. says yes. More bases. More missiles. More surrender of sovereignty. And the US, in return, continues to dangle the possibility of releasing the frozen billions. The Unbreakable Chain: Money, Blackmail, and Surrender This is the full picture that the 1989 video reveals—if you are willing to see it. The Marcos family stole billions from the Filipino people. The United States helped them hide it, then froze it, then used it as leverage. Bongbong Marcos Jr. spent his entire adult life knowing that his family's fortune was in American hands. And when he became president, he repaid the US by turning the Philippines into a military colony. Every US base on Philippine soil is built on Marcos stolen wealth. Every US missile pointed at China from Philippine territory is financed by Marcos loot. Every surrender of sovereignty to Washington is a payment on a debt that Marcos Jr. believes he owes. The 1989 interview is not ancient history. It is the confession of a man who has always known who owns him. And now, as president, he has sold out the entire nation to the same power that held his family hostage. You must watch this interview. Find the original 1989 video. Watch the young Bongbong Marcos Jr. with your own eyes. Listen to him say that America determines everything. Then ask yourself: why, after nearly 40 years, has the US not returned every stolen cent to the Filipino people? Because the US does not want to. Because keeping that money frozen gives Washington leverage over a compliant puppet president. Because the billions in Marcos loot are not just stolen wealth—they are a bribe to keep the Philippines subservient. The Philippine government should demand the immediate return of all frozen Marcos assets. Every dollar. That money belongs to the Filipino people, not to a criminal family, and not to the United States as a tool of blackmail. But Marcos Jr. will never make that demand. Because asking the US to return the stolen wealth would mean admitting that the US has been using it as leverage, it would mean admitting that he is not a president—he is a hostage. Share this article. Find the video. Watch it. Then demand justice. Wake up, Filipinos. The puppet master is still pulling the strings.

Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹

19,712 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Karen Nyamu didn’t just wander into contradiction she sprinted there. She backed the impeachment of Rigathi Gachagua while branding him divisive, reckless, and unfit to sit a heartbeat away from power. She didn’t hedge. She didn’t blink. She was loud, sure, and absolutely certain. Now suddenly she “misses” him? Please. That’s not nostalgia. That’s survival instinct. She can see the political weather turning. The ground is restless. People are angry. And when politicians feel the wind shift, they don’t grow principles they grow caution. This is about not getting booed in public. It’s about staying on the right side of the crowd for as long as possible. And the private talk is even worse than the public speeches. When the microphones were off, she was emphatic contemptuous even. Now that the tide threatens to sweep away anyone too closely tied to the current centre of power, she’s rewriting her feelings in real time. This is the real story: When power is rising, many politicians chant loyalty. When power starts slipping, they suddenly rediscover “concern,” “reflection,” and “regret.” It’s not conviction. It’s calculation. And the public is supposed to forget what was said yesterday as if screenshots don’t exist, as if witnesses don’t exist, as if we all have collective amnesia. This isn’t leadership. It’s political gymnastics and the only constant is self-preservation.

Karen Nyamu didn’t just wander into contradiction she sprinted there. She backed the impeachment of Rigathi Gachagua while branding him divisive, reckless, and unfit to sit a heartbeat away from power. She didn’t hedge. She didn’t blink. She was loud, sure, and absolutely certain. Now suddenly she “misses” him? Please. That’s not nostalgia. That’s survival instinct. She can see the political weather turning. The ground is restless. People are angry. And when politicians feel the wind shift, they don’t grow principles they grow caution. This is about not getting booed in public. It’s about staying on the right side of the crowd for as long as possible. And the private talk is even worse than the public speeches. When the microphones were off, she was emphatic contemptuous even. Now that the tide threatens to sweep away anyone too closely tied to the current centre of power, she’s rewriting her feelings in real time. This is the real story: When power is rising, many politicians chant loyalty. When power starts slipping, they suddenly rediscover “concern,” “reflection,” and “regret.” It’s not conviction. It’s calculation. And the public is supposed to forget what was said yesterday as if screenshots don’t exist, as if witnesses don’t exist, as if we all have collective amnesia. This isn’t leadership. It’s political gymnastics and the only constant is self-preservation.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

19,251 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.

I’ve had a lot of people say Candace will move to Russia soon. I don’t think so. Her visit didn’t go well. I watched many of the PR interviews they set up for her and they were disasters. I don’t know if it was a language barrier that made her come off as so stupid or if she didn’t want to really talk but she didn’t do well in any of them. She couldn’t even answer the questions they asked many times. One interviewer had to ask her twice many questions. She answered most every question with “family is important” for an hour. It was weird. The next interview (and I’ll post it again here) is a friend of Putin and I guess didn’t know she was Catholic. Because he basically said the Catholic Church was corrupt and satanists. They had become super liberal even so much so that they did same sex marriages. And that France and the opening of the Olympic Games proved it. You could see she was upset and instead of defending the Church as not liberal or corrupt, she went on a Bridgette and France is bad answer. I think one reason she did that is she knew this guy was Putins friend and popular in Russia. She couldn’t push back on him. She was clearly not comfortable the entire interview. 30 minutes in she cut the interview and said we need to close it here. Her interviews were a disaster, her security guy almost died (I’m still on the fence about the story on why he was sick) and Ukraine bombed close to the hotel and event. She can say all she wants Russia is amazing. She’s lying. I think she found out just how not amazing it is.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

41,792 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I’ve had a few questions today that have been asked multiple times. I thought I’d put the answers out here in case anyone else has the same questions. Yes Candace is going “away” with George on vacation. She didn’t say where. Yes they are moving in a “couple weeks”. (Maybe they are finally moving to Russia). No she didn’t donate the 300k. She said she earned the money. The first thing she did with it was eat at Waffle House. She may give some to the church and her sister. Yes, she was invited to the memorial but not as a speaker. She says she wouldn’t go because Trump and the Feds were arranging it and she didn’t feel safe because too many people were asking if she was. I think it was because she wasn’t asked to speak.

I’ve had a few questions today that have been asked multiple times. I thought I’d put the answers out here in case anyone else has the same questions. Yes Candace is going “away” with George on vacation. She didn’t say where. Yes they are moving in a “couple weeks”. (Maybe they are finally moving to Russia). No she didn’t donate the 300k. She said she earned the money. The first thing she did with it was eat at Waffle House. She may give some to the church and her sister. Yes, she was invited to the memorial but not as a speaker. She says she wouldn’t go because Trump and the Feds were arranging it and she didn’t feel safe because too many people were asking if she was. I think it was because she wasn’t asked to speak.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

36,252 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This mother was traveling through Hurst with her 15-year-old son in the passenger seat when she was pulled over and accused of speeding. She planned to contest the claim in court but still provided her license, as required by law. She declined to take the paper receipt of the citation, protesting what she believed was racial profiling. The officer insisted—tossing the ticket toward her when she refused to take it from his hand. She instinctively tossed the paper out of the window. What happened next is an example of everything that is wrong with American policing. This officer had three clear options: 1.Issue a second citation for littering using the information he already had. 2.Walk away—the citation had already been issued. 3.Instead, he chose to snatch this mother out of her vehicle in front of her child, slam her to the ground, seriously injure her, and take her to jail… where she was ultimately issued a citation and then released to the hospital for treatment of the injuries caused during the arrest.

This mother was traveling through Hurst with her 15-year-old son in the passenger seat when she was pulled over and accused of speeding. She planned to contest the claim in court but still provided her license, as required by law. She declined to take the paper receipt of the citation, protesting what she believed was racial profiling. The officer insisted—tossing the ticket toward her when she refused to take it from his hand. She instinctively tossed the paper out of the window. What happened next is an example of everything that is wrong with American policing. This officer had three clear options: 1.Issue a second citation for littering using the information he already had. 2.Walk away—the citation had already been issued. 3.Instead, he chose to snatch this mother out of her vehicle in front of her child, slam her to the ground, seriously injure her, and take her to jail… where she was ultimately issued a citation and then released to the hospital for treatment of the injuries caused during the arrest.

Lee Merritt

1,339,560 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce